Laparoscopic intrauterine insemination in the bitch

A technique for laparoscopic intrauterine insemination in bitches is described. During natural estrus, 5 beagle bitches were inseminated and S others were naturally mated (control group) twice at a 48-h interval on Days 3 and S (n = 4) or Days 4 and 6 (n = 6) after the increase in plasma progesterone considered to be indicative of the day of the preovulatory LH peak. All the inseminations were with fresh semen and under general anesthesia. The technique involved the introductions of 1) a Verres needle to insufflate the abdominal cavity by direct punction on the middle line 1 cm over the umbilicus, 2) a laparoscope to visualize the abdominal cavity by a 1 cm puncture on the middle line 1 cm under the umbilicus, 3) a forceps used to manipulate the uterus by a 0.5 cm puncture at 2 to 3 cm lateral to the mammary glands, and 4) an 18-g catheter used to puncture the uterus on the middle line between the 3rd and 5th mammary gland. The uterine body was grasped by the forceps and elevated against the ventral abdominal wall. The 18-g catheter was then inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the uterine lumen, and 1.0 ml of fresh semen containing 250 to 480 x 10(6) spermatozoa/ml was injected. The inseminations resulted in pregnancies in all animals. Litter size was similar in the artificially inseminated and naturally mated bitches (5 +/- 1.8 and 4.8 +/- 1.6 pups per litter, respectively). Bitches in the artificially inseminated group delivered at 65.2 +/- 0.8 d and in the natural mated group at 65.4 +/- 0.5 d after the LH peak. In conclusion, this paper gives the first results of intrauterine laparoscopic insemination in bitches, indicating interesting perspectives for this technique in dog's reproduction.     

Caffeine and artificial insemination

We studied the reactivation of cells and the repair of photomutagenic damage induced by xanthotoxin and visnagin plus NUV in arg-1 cells of Chlamydomonas reinhardii. Maintenance of liquid cultures in the dark resulted only in a slight reactivation of cells, even after 24 h. Repair of photomutagenic damage was more efficient: within 24 h the number of Arg⁺ revertants was reduced by 50% in cells cultured in the dark at 20°C. The repair was more efficient at 30°C. At the beginning of dark cultivation an after-effect could be observed. Cultivation in standard white light instead of dark after treatment resulted in a very strong after-effect. Therefore it was not possible to detect any photoreactivation.After treatment with xanthotoxin plus standard white light (24 h) neither reactivation of cells nor repair of photomutagenic damage was found. The after-effect was higher than after xanthotoxin plus NUV. It is possible that a small amount of repair could be masked by the after-effect.Treatment with visnagin yielded similar results. The photomutagenic effect of visnagin is described for the first time in this paper. The drug is a much less effective photomutagen than xanthotoxin. The photomutagenesis of visnagin may be attributable to photoproducts similar to those formed after treatment with furocoumarins.No definite conclusion can be drawn from the present results regarding the basis for the observed lack of repair (or reduced repair) after standard white light treatment; a possible cause might be a preferential formation of bi-adducts under these conditions.     

Artificial insemination in marsupials

Assisted breeding technology (ART), including artificial insemination (AI), has the potential to advance the conservation and welfare of marsupials. Many of the challenges facing AI and ART for marsupials are shared with other wild species. However, the marsupial mode of reproduction and development also poses unique challenges and opportunities. For the vast majority of marsupials, there is a dearth of knowledge regarding basic reproductive biology to guide an AI strategy. For threatened or endangered species, only the most basic reproductive information is available in most cases, if at all. Artificial insemination has been used to produce viable young in two marsupial species, the koala and tammar wallaby. However, in these species the timing of ovulation can be predicted with considerably more confidence than in any other marsupial. In a limited number of other marsupials, such precise timing of ovulation has only been achieved using hormonal treatment leading to conception but not live young. A unique marsupial ART strategy which has been shown to have promise is cross-fostering; the transfer of pouch young of a threatened species to the pouches of foster mothers of a common related species as a means to increase productivity. For the foreseeable future, except for a few highly iconic or well studied species, there is unlikely to be sufficient reproductive information on which to base AI. However, if more generic approaches can be developed; such as ICSI (to generate embryos) and female synchronization (to provide oocyte donors or embryo recipients), then the prospects for broader application of AI/ART to marsupials are promising.     

Artificial insemination: the state of the art

The history of research into artificial insemination (AI) is over two centuries old and its commercial application now spans 75 years. It is appropriate to reflect on the contribution of this powerful method of gene dispersal. AI remains as one of the most important assisted reproductive technologies. The three cornerstones for its application are: it is simple, economical and successful. The importance of AI will be challenged in the next few decades. The remarkable progress made in other assisted reproductive technologies does have the potential to rapidly generate offspring. The challenge for any of these reproductive technologies to attain widespread use is to match AI in being simple, economical and successful. This review aims at capturing the salient advances in AI, the comparisons with natural mating and other reproductive technologies, and, whether the future of AI will be challenged. It predicts what the new horizon looks like and the role that AI will play in the overall reproductive technologies landscape.     

Artificial insemination technology for the emu--improving sperm survival

For the emu, where monogamous mating is normal, artificial insemination (AI) promises much faster genetic improvement and a considerable reduction in production costs by reducing the number of male birds needed for mating. Semen collection is now a routine procedure so the next step is to develop successful protocols for sperm storage. In this paper, we briefly overview our recent progress on the development of protocols for liquid storage and cryopreservation of emu spermatozoa. We have shown that emu semen can be stored at 10 °C for up to 48 h with a minimal loss of viability, and that cryopreservation with dimethylacetamide (DMA) as a cryoprotectant is feasible because we have observed no adverse effects of this cryoprotectant on the emu sperm membrane integrity, morphology and motility. We now need to establish the predictability of the various tests in vivo, but the proportions of live normal and motile sperm with good egg membrane penetration potential suggest that acceptable numbers of competent sperm are preserved and that this will be sufficient for AI.     

Ultrastructural examination of the insemination reaction in Drosophila

The insemination reaction is a swelling of the female vagina caused by the male ejaculate. This postmating phenomenon is common among species in the genus Drosophila. It could act as a plug securing male paternity. It is not clear, however, what benefits it provides to the female. The structure formed in the female vagina is expelled in some species and disappears gradually in others suggesting different phenomena. Based on ultrastructural examination of the vaginal contents of five Drosophila species (D. mettleri, D. nigrospiracula, D. melanogaster, D. mojavensis, and D. hexastigma), we propose three terms to describe these vaginal structures: the sperm sac, the mating plug, and the true insemination reaction. Each term describes a distinct structure associated with a specific female postmating behavior. This study questions the concept of the insemination reaction as a single phenomenon and discusses its possible functions from an evolutionary perspective.     

Artificial insemination in dromedary camels

Artificial insemination (AI) is an important technique in all domestic species to ensure rapid genetic progress. The use of AI has been reported in camelids although insemination trials are rare. This could be because of the difficulties involved in collecting as well as handling the semen due to the gelatinous nature of the seminal plasma. In addition, as all camelids are induced ovulators, the females need to be induced to ovulate before being inseminated.     

Effect of a deep uterine insemination on spermatozoal accessibility to the ovum in cattle: a competitive insemination study

A competitive insemination study was conducted to determine the effect of a deep uterine insemination on accessory sperm number per embryo in cattle. Cryopreserved semen of a fertile bull characterized by spermatozoa with a semi-flattened region of the anterior sperm head (marked bull) was matched with cryopreserved semen from an unmarked bull having spermatozoa with a conventional head shape. Using 0.25-mL French straws and a side delivery embryo transfer device, deep uterine insemination (0.125 mL deposited in each horn) was performed 2 cm from the uterotubal junction. Immediately after, the uterine body was artificially inseminated using semen (0.25 mL) from an alternate bull and a conventional insemination device. The complete dose (both inseminations) was 50x10(6) total sperm cells consisting of an equal number of spermatozoa from each bull. Single ovulating cows (n = 95) were inseminated at random with either the unmarked semen in the uterine body and marked semen in the uterine horn, or the unmarked semen in the uterine horn and marked semen in the uterine body. Sixty-one embryos(ova) were recovered nonsurgically 6 d post insemination, of which 40 were fertilized and contained accessory spermatozoa. The ratio and total number of accessory spermatozoa recovered was different among treatments: 62:38 (326) for the unmarked semen in the uterine body and marked semen in the uterine horn, and 72:28 (454) for the unmarked semen in the uterine horn and marked semen in the uterine body (P<0.05). Deep uterine insemination using this semen in a split dose and a side delivery device favors accessibility of spermatozoa to the ovum compared with conventional uterine body insemination.     

Influence of time of insemination relative to ovulation and frequency of insemination on gilt fertility

The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal time of insemination in the pre-ovulatory period (from 32 to 0 h before ovulation) and to evaluate once-daily versus twice-daily inseminations in gilts. In Experiment 1, pre-puberal gilts (n=102) were observed for estrus every 8h and ultrasonography was performed every 8h from the onset of estrus to confirmation of ovulation. The gilts were inseminated once with 4 x 10(9) spermatozoa at various intervals prior to ovulation. Pregnancy detection was conducted 24 days after AI and gilts were slaughtered 4-6 days later. Corpora lutea and the number of viable embryos were counted and the embryo recovery rate was calculated (based on the percentage of corpora lutea). Inseminations performed <24h before ovulation resulted in a higher embryo recovery rate (P=0.02) and produced 2.1 more embryos (P=0.01) than inseminations >or=24h before ovulation. However, the pregnancy rate was reduced when inseminations were performed >16 h before ovulation (P=0.08). In Experiment 2, pre-puberal gilts (n=105) were observed for estrus every 12h and ultrasonography was performed every 12h from the onset of estrus to confirmation of ovulation. Gilts were inseminated (with 4 x 10(9) spermatozoa) 12h after the onset of estrus, with inseminations repeated either every 12h (twice-daily) or 24h (once-daily) during estrus. The gilts were allowed to farrow. There were no differences (between gilts bred twice-daily versus once-daily) for return to estrus rate (P=0.36) and adjusted farrowing rate (P=0.19). However, gilts inseminated once-daily had 1.2 piglets less than those inseminated twice-daily (P=0.09). In conclusion, gilts should be inseminated up to 16 h before ovulation, as intervals >16 h reduced pregnancy rate and litter size.