The role of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs/ECOFFs) in antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation for uncommon yeasts and moulds

The role of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is to aid in selecting the best agent for the treatment of bacterial and fungal diseases. This has been best achieved by the setting of breakpoints by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for prevalent Candida spp. versus anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) also has set breakpoints for prevalent and common Candida and Aspergillus species versus amphotericin B, itraconazole, and posaconazole. Recently, another interpretive category, the epidemiological cut off value, could aid in the early identification of strains with acquired resistance mechanisms. CLSI has postulated that epidemiological cut off values may, with due caution, aid physicians in managing mycosis by species where breakpoints are not available. This review provides (1) the criteria and statistical approach to establishing and estimating epidemiological cut off values (ECVs), (2) the role of the epidemiological cut off value in establishing breakpoints, (3) the potential role of epidemiological cut off values in clinical practice, (4) and the wide range of CLSI-based epidemiological cut off values reported in the literature as well as EUCAST and Sensititre Yeast One-ECVs. Additionally, we provide MIC/MEC (minimal inhibitory concentrations/minimum effective concentrations) ranges/modes of each pooled distribution used for epidemiological cut off value calculation. We focus on the epidemiological cut off value, the new interpretive endpoint that will identify the non-wild type strains (defined as potentially harboring resistance mechanisms). However, we emphasize that epidemiological cut off values will not categorize a fungal isolate as susceptible or resistant as breakpoints do, because the former do not account for the pharmacology of the antifungal agent or the findings from clinical outcome studies.     

Evaluation of Etest Performed in Mueller–Hinton Agar Supplemented with Glucose for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Filamentous Fungi

Although reference broth microdilution protocol is currently available for filamentous fungi antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST), simpler alternatives as Etest^® tend to be favoured in clinical routine, making their validation of utmost importance. In this study, Etest^® method using 2 % glucose supplemented Muller–Hinton agar was compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 protocol for filamentous fungi AFST. The echinocandins, caspofungin and anidulafungin, the azoles voriconazole and posaconazole, and the polyene amphotericin B were tested against 48 Aspergillus spp., seven Fusarium spp., one Beauveria bassiana and three Paecilomyces lilacinus isolates. The majority of the isolates were susceptible to the antifungals tested, and the overall level of agreement between the CLSI and Etest methods was 71.9 % for one dilution and 99.7 % when using two dilutions. Since interpretative breakpoints for filamentous fungi employing the CLSI or Etest methods are not available yet, the established epidemiological cut-off values for Aspergillus spp. were used to distinguish wild-type isolates from those with acquired resistance mechanisms. Forty-five Aspergillus strains did not evidence resistance mutations.     

EUCAST and CLSI: Working Together Towards a Harmonized Method for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

The U.S. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST) have developed broth microdilution methodologies for testing yeasts and filamentous fungi (molds). The mission of these methodologies is to identify in vitro antifungal resistance, which is accomplished by the use of either clinical breakpoints (CBPs), or to a lesser degree, epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs). The newly adjusted and species-specific CLSI CBPs for Candida spp. versus fluconazole and voriconazole have ameliorated some of the differences between the two methodologies. In the absence of CBPs for mold testing, CLSI ECVs are available for six Aspergillus species versus the triazoles, caspofungin and amphotericin B. Recently, breakpoints were developed by the EUCAST for certain Aspergillus spp. versus amphotercin B, itraconazole and posaconazole, which to some extent are comparable to ECVs. We summarize these latest accomplishments, which have made possible the harmonization of some susceptibility cutoffs, if not methodologies for some agent/species combinations.     

Emerging Resistance to Azoles and Echinocandins: Clinical Relevance and Laboratory Detection

Failure to respond to antifungal therapy could be due to in vitro resistance (intrinsic or developed during therapy) or clinical resistance. In vitro resistance is mostly due to genetic mutations (resistance mechanisms), and it is associated with high minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimal effective concentrations (MECs), and/or clinical failure. Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and/or epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) are useful to detect the in vitro antifungal resistance when isolates are tested by standardized methods. ECVs are available from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for Candida spp. versus echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) and triazoles (fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole). Lately, the CLSI has adjusted to species-specific CBPs for Candida spp. versus fluconazole, similar to those of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and versus echinocandins. However, the available voriconazole EUCAST and CLSI CBPs differ. In the absence of CBPs, EUCAST and CLSI assigned ECVs for various Aspergillus spp. and triazoles. This article reviews emerging resistance, laboratory detection, and clinical relevance as reported in the literature in the past 3 to 4 years.     

Change of Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Guidelines from CLSI to EUCAST: Influence on Cumulative Hospital Antibiograms

Objective

We studied whether the change in antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) guidelines from CLSI to EUCAST influenced cumulative antibiograms in a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland.

Methods

Antibiotic susceptibilities of non-duplicate isolates collected within a one-year period before (period A) and after (period B) changing AST interpretation from CLSI 2009 to EUCAST 1.3 (2011) guidelines were analysed. In addition, period B isolates were reinterpreted according to the CLSI 2009, CLSI 2013 and EUCAST 3.1 (2013) guidelines.

Results

The majority of species/drug combinations showed no differences in susceptibility rates comparing periods A and B. However, in some gram-negative bacilli, decreased susceptibility rates were observed when comparing CLSI 2009 with EUCAST 1.3 within period B: Escherichia coli / cefepime, 95.8% (CLSI 2009) vs. 93.1% (EUCAST 1.3), P=0.005; Enterobacter cloacae / cefepime, 97.0 (CLSI 2009) vs. 90.5% (EUCAST 1.3), P=0.012; Pseudomonas aeruginosa / meropenem, 88.1% (CLSI 2009) vs. 78.3% (EUCAST 1.3), P=0.002. These differences were still evident when comparing susceptibility rates according to the CLSI 2013 guideline with EUCAST 3.1 guideline. For P. aeruginosa and imipenem, a trend towards a lower antibiotic susceptibility rate in ICUs compared to general wards turned into a significant difference after the change to EUCAST: 87.9% vs. 79.8%, P=0.08 (CLSI 2009) and 86.3% vs. 76.8%, P=0.048 (EUCAST 1.3).

Conclusions

The change of AST guidelines from CLSI to EUCAST led to a clinically relevant decrease of susceptibility rates in cumulative antibiograms for defined species/drug combinations, particularly in those with considerable differences in clinical susceptibility breakpoints between the two guidelines.     

Advances in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida</Emphasis>, 2010–2012

Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida has been standardized and refined and now may play an important role in managing Candida infections. Important new developments include the establishment of species-specific epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for the systemically active antifungal agents and both common and uncommon species of Candida. The clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for fluconazole, voriconazole, and the echinocandins have been revised to provide species-specific interpretive criteria for the six most common species that not only are predictive of clinical outcome but also provide a more sensitive means of identifying those strains with acquired or mutational resistance mechanisms. Collaborative work by the CLSI and EUCAST organizations has made major advances in the harmonization of these two international standards. The impact of the recent changes in the CBPs on commercial MIC methods does not appear to be major but additional studies with well defined resistant populations are necessary to confirm the ability of these systems to detect emerging resistance.     

Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiologic Cutoff Values for Fluconazole and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida</Emphasis>: Time for New Clinical Breakpoints?

Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida against fluconazole has been standardized by both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Both CLSI and EUCAST have developed clinical breakpoint (CBP) criteria for fluconazole, but these differ in both magnitude and target species. Studies using the EUCAST method have also defined wild-type minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs or ECOFFs) for the common species of Candida. The ECVs serve as a sensitive means of discriminating wild-type strains from those with acquired resistance mechanisms and include MICs of 1 μg/mL for C. albicans, 2 μg/mL for C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis, 32 μg/mL for C. glabrata, and 128 μg/mL for C. krusei. Because the CLSI CBPs may be too insensitive to detect emerging resistance among strains of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, and bisect the WT MIC distribution of C. glabrata, we sought to establish the wild-type MIC distribution and ECVs for fluconazole and Candida spp. The establishment of the wild-type MIC distributions and ECVs for fluconazole using CLSI methods will be useful in resistance surveillance and may prove to be an important step in the development of species-specific CBPs for this important antifungal agent.     

Evaluation of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing with Microdilution and Etest Methods of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida</Emphasis> Blood Isolates

Candida species that show an increasing number of clinical and/or microbiological resistance to several antifungals and are the most common agents of invasive fungal infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro susceptibility of Candida blood isolates to antifungal agents (amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole) by comparative use of the CLSI reference microdilution method and Etest. Four hundred Candida blood isolates (215 Candida albicans, 185 non-albicans Candida strains) were included in the study. The broth microdilution test was performed according to the CLSI M27 A2 document. Etest was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The MIC results obtained with reference microdilution were compared with those obtained with the Etest by using percent and categorical agreements. According to MIK₉₀ values, voriconazole was the most active and itraconazole was the least active drug in vitro against all Candida species. Other than voriconazole, statistically significant differences were found when the susceptibility of Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida spp. to amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole were compared. These antifungal agents were found to be more active to C. albicans. Among the non-albicans Candida species, the lowest MIC values were obtained for Candida parapsilosis isolates. When the standard method was compared with Etest, the total agreement was higher for C. albicans than for non-albicans species, especially for fluconazole and voriconazole. In view of the findings, it was concluded that itraconazole showed the lowest activity against all Candida species. Etest could be an alternative method in assessing the in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp., but it is more convenient to use the microdilution method for studying in vitro susceptibility of non-albicans species, in particular for those possessing high MIC values against azoles.     

Species level identification and antifungal susceptibility of yeasts isolated from various clinical specimens and evaluation of Integral System Yeasts Plus

It is essential to use easy, standard, cost-effective and accurate methods for identification and susceptibility testing of yeasts in routine practice. This study aimed to establish the species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of yeast isolates and also to evaluate the performance of the colorimetric and commercially available Integral System Yeasts Plus (ISYP). Yeast isolates (n=116) were identified by conventional methods and ISYP. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed by the microdilution method according to the standards of CLSI M27-A3 and ISYP. Candida albicans (50%) was the most common species isolated, followed by C. parapsilosis (25%) (mostly in blood samples). According to the CLSI M27-S3 criteria, resistance rates for amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were 0%, 0%, 4.6%, 4.5% and 1.8%, respectively. Resistance for miconazole (MIC >1 mg/L) was found as 17.9%. Sixty-two (53.4%) of the isolates which were analyzed by ISYP showed disagreement with those identified by the conventional methods and API ID 32C identification kit or a specific identification code could not be assigned by ISYP. The performance of ISYP could be indicated as low for all antifungal drugs tested according to the ROC analysis (AUC: 0.28-0.56). As the current version of ISYP displays a poor performance, it is recommended to use the other commercial systems whose results are approved as reliable and in agreement with those of the reference methods in identification and susceptibility testing of yeasts.     

Rapid Identification and Susceptibility Testing of Candida spp. from Positive Blood Cultures by Combination of Direct MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Direct Inoculation of Vitek 2

Fungaemia is associated with high mortality rates and early appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for patient management. However, classical diagnostic workflow takes up to several days due to the slow growth of yeasts. Therefore, an approach for direct species identification and direct antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) without prior time-consuming sub-culturing of yeasts from positive blood cultures (BCs) is urgently needed. Yeast cell pellets prepared using Sepsityper kit were used for direct identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) and for direct inoculation of Vitek 2 AST-YS07 card for AFST. For comparison, MALDI-TOF MS and Vitek 2 testing were performed from yeast subculture. A total of twenty four positive BCs including twelve C. glabrata, nine C. albicans, two C. dubliniensis and one C. krusei isolate were processed. Applying modified thresholds for species identification (score ≥1.5 with two identical consecutive propositions), 62.5% of BCs were identified by direct MALDI-TOF MS. AFST results were generated for 72.7% of BCs directly tested by Vitek 2 and for 100% of standardized suspensions from 24 h cultures. Thus, AFST comparison was possible for 70 isolate-antifungal combinations. Essential agreement (minimum inhibitory concentration difference ≤1 double dilution step) was 88.6%. Very major errors (VMEs) (false-susceptibility), major errors (false-resistance) and minor errors (false categorization involving intermediate result) amounted to 33.3% (of resistant isolates), 1.9% (of susceptible isolates) and 1.4% providing 90.0% categorical agreement. All VMEs were due to fluconazole or voriconazole. This direct method saved on average 23.5 h for identification and 15.1 h for AFST, compared to routine procedures. However, performance for azole susceptibility testing was suboptimal and testing from subculture remains indispensable to validate the direct finding.     

In vitro methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Trichophyton spp.

In general, methods to test the susceptibility of fungi to antifungal drugs require standardized techniques, but so far there is no methodology that is widely applicable to dermatophytes. Here we introduced modifications to the protocols from documents of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (CLSI) M38-A and the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) that are usually applied to moulds and fermentative yeasts, in order to adjust the conditions for the growth of dermatophytes. The modifications included: growth on potato dextrose agar supplemented with 2 % in-house rice flour to encourage sporulation, the addition of 2 % glucose to the culture media (RPMI-1640), and an incubation temperature of 28 °C. In addition, the incubation period was 7 d, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as 80 % growth inhibition endpoints for azole agents, and the inocula only contained microconidia. Results obtained by both tested methodologies were very similar to the ones reported by other researchers. MIC₉₀ (MIC at which 90% of isolates tested were inhibited) values were identical for four out of five antifungal drugs tested and there was only a difference of one or two dilutions when MIC₅₀ values were compared. Although the modifications introduced did not interfere with the results, more studies are necessary to establish a standard technique to test susceptibility of dermatophytes to antifungal drugs.     

Evaluation of a new method for antifungal susceptibility testing for azoles

The interpretation of the end points in azole antifungal drug susceptibility testing is challenging, in part due to incomplete growth inhibition of Candida species. Since the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution method have limitation with azoles, a new modification of the CLSI microdilution protocol was evaluated. We measure the decrease in growth rate (μ) of exponentially growing cultures in accordance to different azole concentrations at time intervals up to 10 h. Using 15 different Candida strains, an overall agreement within ± 2 dilutions by the CLSI method at 24 h in RPMI and the μ-dependent method for three antifungal agents (fluconazole- itraconazole and voriconazole) was achieved. MIC measurement by the new method was less sensitive to the medium used or the inoculum size applied. The presented data suggested that, measuring the in vitro inhibition kinetics at the logarithmic phase could have advantages for addressing susceptibility testing toward azoles.     

Comparative evaluation of E-test and CLSI methods for Itraconazole,Fluconazole and Ketoconazole susceptibilities of Microsporum canis strains

The incidence of resistance to antifungal agents for dermatophytes is increasing, but most of the methods currently available to test the antifungal susceptibility of Microsporum canis still require standardization. The aims of this study were: (i) to evaluate the antifungal susceptibility of M. canis strains recovered from animals to ketoconazole (KTZ), fluconazole (FLZ) and itraconazole (ITZ) using a modified CLSI broth microdilution (CLSI M38-A2-BMD) and the E-test® protocols and (ii) to estimate the agreement between the methods. Tentative azole epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) were also proposed in order to interpret the results of in vitro susceptibility tests and to establish the agreement between the E-test and CLSI BMD methods. A total of forty clinical M. canis strains from animals with skin lesions were tested, and the essential (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) between the two methods were determined. KTZ displayed the lowest MIC values, while ITZ and FLZ the highest. The ECV for KTZ and ITZ were 4 μg/ml, while those of FLZ was 64 μg/ml. Based on ECVs, about 88% of M. canis strains were susceptible to all azoles being a cross-resistance with ITZ-FLZ registered for one strain. A total of five M. canis strains showed MIC?>?ECV for FLZ using CLSI, while one strain showed MIC?>?ECV for ITZ using both tests. KTZ, ITZ and FLZ showed EA ranging from 92.5 to 95%, for all azoles and CA?>?97% except for FLZ (87.5%). The good CA between the E-test and the CLSI BMD provides evidence of the reliability of the former method to test the antifungal susceptibility of M. canis for ITZ and KTZ and not for FLZ.

     

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Cryptococcus</Emphasis> Species and Mechanisms of Resistance: Implications for Clinical Laboratories

Purpose of Review

Resistance to antifungal drugs amongst Candida species is a growing concern, and azole resistance may be emerging in Cryptococcus species. This review provides a contemporary perspective, relevant to the clinical mycology laboratory, of antifungal susceptibility testing of these fungi, focussing on the challenges of phenotypic and genotypic methodologies to detect drug resistance.

Recent Findings

Standardised CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution (BMD) susceptibility testing methods are the benchmark to determine clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and/or epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) MICs for Candida and Cryptococcus spp. Commercial methods may be used but caution is required when employing BMD CBPs/ECVs to interpret results. Species-specific CBPs/ECVs for Candida spp. generally correlate well with predicting likelihood of therapeutic failure or of presence of a drug resistance mechanism with the exception of the echinocandins where the presence of specific FKS gene mutations and not the MIC correlates most accurately with clinical outcome. The relationship of presence of one or more mechanisms of azole resistance and drug MICs is uncertain. Next generation sequencing technology is offering insights into the relationships between susceptibility results obtained by phenotypic and genotypic methods. For Cryptococcus spp., CBPs are not established but species- and genetic type-specific EVCs are useful for guiding therapy where clinically indicated. Isolates of genotype VGII appear to exhibit the highest MICs.

Summary

Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts is important to detect drug resistance. For Candida spp., MICs have clinical utility for the azoles but detecting echinocandin resistance by genotypic methods is preferred. For Cryptococcus spp., ECVs are useful in guiding therapy.

     

Susceptibility Screening of Hyphae-Forming Fungi with a New, Easy, and Fast Inoculum Preparation Method

In vitro susceptibility testing of clinically important fungi becomes more and more essential due to the rising number of fungal infections in patients with impaired immune system. Existing standardized microbroth dilution methods for in vitro testing of molds (CLSI, EUCAST) are not intended for routine testing. These methods are very time-consuming and dependent on sporulating of hyphomycetes. In this multicentre study, a new (independent of sporulation) inoculum preparation method (containing a mixture of vegetative cells, hyphae, and conidia) was evaluated. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of amphotericin B, posaconazole, and voriconazole of 180 molds were determined with two different culture media (YST and RPMI 1640) according to the DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) microdilution assay. 24 and 48?h MIC of quality control strains, tested per each test run, prepared with the new inoculum method were in the range of DIN. YST and RPMI 1640 media showed similar MIC distributions for all molds tested. MIC readings at 48 versus 24?h yield 1 log₂ higher MIC values and more than 90?% of the MICs read at 24 and 48?h were within ±2 log₂ dilution. MIC end point reading (log_{2 MIC-RPMI 1640}?log_{2 MIC-YST}) of both media demonstrated a tendency to slightly lower MICs with RPMI 1640 medium. This study reports the results of a new, time–saving, and easy-to-perform method for inoculum preparation for routine susceptibility testing that can be applied for all types of spore-/non-spore and hyphae-forming fungi.     

Colorimetric broth microdilution method for the antifungal screening of plant extracts against yeasts

Screening plant extracts for antifungal activity is increasing due to demand for new antifungal agents, but the testing methods present many challenges. Standard broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of available antifungal agents are available now, but these methods are optimised for single compounds instead of crude plant extracts. In this study we evaluated the standard NCCLS method as well as a modification which uses spectrophotometric determination of the end-points with a plate reader. We also evaluated another standard method, the EUCAST method, which is a similar microdilution assay to the NCCLS method, but uses a larger inoculum size and a higher glucose concentration in the medium as well as spectrophotometric end-point determination. The results showed that all three methods had some drawbacks for testing plant extracts and thus we modified the NCCLS broth microdilution method by including a colorimetric indicator-resazurin for end-point determination. This modified method showed good reproducibility and clear-cut end-point, plus the end-point determination needed no instruments. It enabled us to evaluate the activity of a selection of extracts from six Combretaceous plants against three Candida spp. and thus provided pharmacological evidence for some traditional uses of these plants while assisting the identification of the active ingredients.     

Mechanisms of resistance to antifungal agents: yeasts and filamentous fungi

Failure to respond to antifungal therapy could be due to in vitro resistance (intrinsic or developed during therapy) or clinical resistance; the latter is associated with numerous factors related to the host, the antifungal agent, or the infecting isolate. Recently, a susceptible MIC breakpoint ( < or =2 microg/ml) was designed for Candida spp. to all three available echinocandins, anidulafungin (Pfizer), caspofungin (Merck) and micafungin (Astellas) and treatment failures have been associated with MICs > 2 microg/ml. In some of these cases, clinical failure was associated with the genetic mutations described below. Azole and flucytosine breakpoints, and the echinocandin susceptible breakpoint, are useful when isolates are tested by CLSI standardized methods; breakpoints are also available by the EUCAST method. More recently, in vitro resistant MIC breakpoints have been assigned for filamentous fungi (moulds) vs. five antifungal agents, but these categories are not based on correlations of in vitro with in vivo response to therapy. However, itraconazole (Janssen), amphotericin B (Bristol-Myers) and voriconazole (Pfizer) clinical failures in aspergillosis have been correlated with MICs > 2 microg/ml. This article provides a review of reported resistance molecular mechanisms to antifungal agents since 2005; previous related reviews are also listed.     

老年肺结核并存糖尿病合并下呼吸道真菌感染的临床分析

目的探讨老年肺结核并存糖尿病患者合并下呼吸道真菌感染的病原学特征和耐药情况,为今后真菌感染的预防和治疗提供病原学依据。方法对浙江大学西溪校区校医院2009年1月至2013年12月共计127例老年肺结核并存糖尿病患者合并下呼吸道真菌感染的病例进行回顾性分析,研究其病原菌分布及耐药特征;采用ATB自动细菌鉴定仪及配套鉴定药敏条进行试验,按CLSI标准判定药敏结果,用WHONET 5.6软件分析数据。结果 127株真菌主要为白假丝酵母菌,占59.8%,其次为热带假丝酵母菌,占13.4%,药敏结果显示5种主要酵母样真菌对伊曲康唑的耐药率最高,对5-氟胞嘧啶和两性霉素B全敏感。结论从老年肺结核并存糖尿病患者下呼吸道中分离出的真菌对常用抗真菌药物已具有一定的耐药性,临床应加强监测与控制,并根据药敏试验结果合理用药。     

Molecular Identification and Echinocandin Susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis Complex Bloodstream Isolates in Italy, 2007–2014

The Candida parapsilosis group encompasses three species: C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. Here, we describe the incidence and echinocandin susceptibility profile of bloodstream isolates of these three species collected from patients admitted to an Italian university hospital from 2007 to 2014. Molecular identification of cryptic species of the C. parapsilosis complex was performed using polymerase chain reaction amplification of the gene encoding secondary alcohol dehydrogenase, followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme BanI. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using the broth microdilution method according to European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST EDef 7.2) and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI M27-A3) guidelines, and the results were compared with those obtained using the E-test and Sensititre methods. Of the 163 C. parapsilosis complex isolates, 136 (83.4%) were identified as C. parapsilosis, and 27 (16.6%) as C. orthopsilosis. The species-specific incidences were 2.9/10,000 admissions for C. parapsilosis and 0.6/10,000 admissions for C. orthopsilosis. No resistance to echinocandins was detected with any of the methods. The percent essential agreement (EA) between the EUCAST and E-test/Sensititre methods for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin susceptibility was, respectively, as follows: C. parapsilosis, 95.6/97.8, 98.5/88.2, and 93.4/96.3; C. orthopsilosis, 92.6/92.6, 96.3/77.8, and 63.0/66.7. The EA between the CLSI and E-test/Sensititre methods was, respectively, as follows: C. parapsilosis, 99.3/100, 98.5/89.0, and 96.3/98.5; C. orthopsilosis, 96.3/92.6, 100/81.5, and 92.6/88.9. Only minor discrepancies, ranging from 16.9% (C. parapsilosis) to 11.1% (C. orthopsilosis), were observed between the CLSI and E-test/Sensititre methods. In conclusion, this epidemiologic study shows a typical C. parapsilosis complex species distribution, no echinocandin resistance, and it reinforces the relevance of using commercially available microbiological methods to assess antifungal susceptibility. These data improve our knowledge of the national distribution of species of the psilosis group, as there are very few studies of these species in Italy.