Mesenchymal to epithelial conversion in rat metanephros is induced by LIF

Inductive signals cause conversion of mesenchyme into epithelia during the formation of many organs. Yet a century of study has not revealed the inducing molecules. Using a standard model of induction, we found that ureteric bud cells secrete factors that convert kidney mesenchyme to epithelia that, remarkably, then form nephrons. Purification and sequencing of one such factor identified it as leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). LIF acted on epithelial precursors that we identified by the expression of Pax2 and Wnt4. Other IL-6 type cytokines acted like LIF, and deletion of their shared receptor reduced nephron development. In situ, the ureteric bud expressed LIF, and metanephric mesenchyme expressed its receptors. The data suggest that IL-6 cytokines are candidate regulators of mesenchymal to epithelial conversion during kidney development.     

An epithelial precursor is regulated by the ureteric bud and by the renal stroma

Kidney epithelia develop from the metanephric mesenchyme after receiving inductive signals from the ureteric bud and from the renal stroma. However, it is not clear how these signals induce the different types of epithelia that make up the nephron. To investigate inductive signaling, we have isolated clusters of epithelial progenitors from the metanephric mesenchyme, thereby separating them from the renal stroma. When the isolated progenitors were treated with the ureteric bud factor LIF, they expressed epithelial proteins (ZO-1, E-cadherin, laminin alpha(5)) and produced nephrons (36 glomeruli with 58 tubules), indicating that they are the target of inductive signaling from the ureteric bud, and that renal stroma is not absolutely required for epithelial development in vitro. In fact, stroma-depleted epithelial progenitors produced sevenfold more glomeruli than did intact metanephric mesenchyme (5 glomeruli, 127 tubules). Conversely, when epithelial progenitors were treated with both LIF and proteins secreted from a renal stromal cell line, glomerulogenesis was abolished but tubular epithelia were expanded (0 glomeruli, 47 tubules). Hence, by isolating epithelial progenitors from the metanephric mesenchyme, we show that they are targeted by factors from the ureteric bud and from the renal stroma, and that epithelial diversification is stimulated by the ureteric bud and limited by renal stroma.     

Electron microscopic study of in vitro differentiation of the small intestinal endoderm in young bird embryo in the presence or absence of mesenchyme

Electron microscopical studies demonstrated that the small intestinal endoderm of young avian embryos cultures in vitro in the presence or absence of mesenchyme can differentiate into an absorptive epithelium with the brush border, and that, in the absence of mesenchyme the brush border develops much earlier than in the presence of mesenchyme, but goblet cells do not appear and morphogenesis of villi does not occur. These results show that the intestinal mesenchyme controls the endodermal differentiation, though the undifferentiated endoderm possesses self-differentiation potency.     

Ureteric bud controls multiple steps in the conversion of mesenchyme to epithelia

Conversion of renal mesenchyme into epithelia depends on the ureteric bud, but its specific actions are not established. From conditioned media of ureteric bud cells, we have identified molecules that mimic the growth and epithelialization of mesenchyme in vivo. LIF targets late epithelial progenitors surrounding the ureteric bud, and in combination with survival factors, converts them into nephrons. In contrast, 24p3/Ngal targets early progenitors at the kidney's periphery through an iron-mediated, but a transferrin-independent mechanism. Hence, the ureteric bud controls many steps of cell conversion. A genome wide search for ureteric bud-specific molecules will identify additional pathways that induce morphogenesis.     

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions regulate the stage-specific expression of a cell surface proteoglycan, syndecan, in the developing kidney

Morphogenesis of the kidney is regulated by reciprocal tissue interactions between the epithelial ureter bud and the metanephric mesenchyme. The differentiation of the kidney involves profound changes in the extracellular matrix, and therefore matrix receptors may have an important role in this process. We studied the expression of syndecan, a cell surface proteoglycan acting as a receptor for interstitial matrix materials, by using a monoclonal antibody against the core protein of the molecule. Syndecan was not detected in the uninduced metanephric mesenchyme. During the formation of the ureter bud from the Wolffian duct, syndecan appeared in the mesenchymal cells around the invaginating bud. Simultaneously with the first branching of the ureter bud, the whole nephric mesenchyme became syndecan positive, but a 3- to 10-cell-thick layer around the branching ureter bud, representing the presumptive tubular cells, was most intensely stained. During the assembly of the mesenchyme cells into pretubular aggregates, syndecan was detected in these aggregates and, to a lesser degree, in the morphologically undifferentiated mesenchyme. Thereafter syndecan was found only in the differentiating epithelium, from which it was gradually lost during maturation of the nephron. It was last detected in the periphery of the kidney, where tubulogenesis still continued. In transfilter cultures we showed that syndecan appeared in the nephric mesenchyme during the period when the mesenchyme becomes programmed to transform into epithelial structures. By using interspecies recombinations and a species-specific antibody we excluded the possibility that syndecan in the mesenchyme would originate from the inductor. We conclude that syndecan expression is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. The findings that syndecan appeared as an early response to induction and that its distribution showed both spatial and temporal correlation with kidney morphogenesis suggest an important role for this molecule in development.     

Two distinct regulatory steps in cartilage differentiation

The effect of developmental stage on chondrogenic capacity in high-density cell cultures of chick embryonic wing bud mesenchyme is examined. Mesenchyme from stage 19 embryos forms aggregates of closely associated cells which do not form cartilage matrix, nor contain significant levels of type II collagen that are detectable by immunofluorescence, unless they are treated with dibutyryl cyclic AMP. Mesenchyme from stage 24 embryonic wing buds in high-density cell cultures will spontaneously form cartilage, as defined by electron microscopy and immunofluorescence with antibody to type II collagen. Cultures prepared from stage 26 wings form numerous aggregates which fail to accumulate an Alcian blue-staining matrix and which resemble mesenchyme cells morphologically. However, because these cells show considerable intracellular immunofluorescence for type II collagen, they are actually unexpressed cartilage cells. Several treatments, including exposure to dibutyryl cyclic AMP, ascorbic acid and an atmosphere of 5% oxygen, or mixture with small numbers of stage 24 wing mesenchyme cells, stimulate expression, as determined by the accumulation of an Alcian blue-staining matrix and an ultrastructurally recognizable cartilage matrix. Since the addition of similar numbers of differentiated cartilage cells does not stimulate expression of stage 26 cells, it is proposed that initial cartilage expression is dependent on a mesenchyme-specific influence which might be removed by cell dissociation. These studies demonstrate that there are at least two distinct transitions in cartilage differentiation: one involves the conversion of mesenchyme to unexpressed chondrocytes and the second involves mesenchyme-dependent expression of chondrogenic differentiation.     

Inhibition of differentiation by leukemia inhibitory factor distinguishes two induction pathways in P19 embryonal carcinoma cells

The ability of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) to block differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells under a variety of induction conditions was determined. LIF inhibits differentiation under several conditions which lead to endodermal and mesodermal cell lineages including skeletal and cardiac muscle. In contrast, LIF does not block differentiation when cells are induced under conditions which lead to neuro-ectodermal cell types including neurons and astroglial cells. These studies demonstrate that P19 EC cell differentiation can be divided into LIF sensitive and insensitive pathways which correlate with differentiation of endodermal/mesodermal and neuro-ectodermal cell types, respectively. The effect of LIF on mRNA levels for several genes which have previously been implicated in mediating differentiation in P19 EC cells was determined. LIF has no effect on the mRNA levels for retinoic acid receptor (RAR) alpha, RAR beta, RAR gamma, jun A, jun D, c-fos, or fra-1. In contrast LIF stimulates jun B mRNA expression by a factor of four to six under all induction conditions.     

Angioblast-mesenchyme induction of early kidney development is mediated by Wt1 and Vegfa

Most studies on kidney development have considered the interaction of the metanephric mesenchyme and the ureteric bud to be the major inductive event that maintains tubular differentiation and branching morphogenesis. The mesenchyme produces Gdnf, which stimulates branching, and the ureteric bud stimulates continued growth of the mesenchyme and differentiation of nephrons from the induced mesenchyme. Null mutation of the Wt1 gene eliminates outgrowth of the ureteric bud, but Gdnf has been identified as a target of Pax2, but not of Wt1. Using a novel system for microinjecting and electroporating plasmid expression constructs into murine organ cultures, it has been demonstrated that Vegfa expression in the mesenchyme is regulated by Wt1. Previous studies had identified a population of Flk1-expressing cells in the periphery of the induced mesenchyme, and adjacent to the stalk of the ureteric bud, and that Vegfa was able to stimulate growth of kidneys in organ culture. Here it is demonstrated that signaling through Flk1 is required to maintain expression of Pax2 in the mesenchyme of the early kidney, and for Pax2 to stimulate expression of Gdnf. However, once Gdnf stimulates branching of the ureteric bud, the Flk1-dependent angioblast signal is no longer required to maintain branching morphogenesis and induction of nephrons. Thus, this work demonstrates the presence of a second set of inductive events, involving the mesenchymal and angioblast populations, whereby Wt1-stimulated expression of Vegfa elicits an as-yet-unidentified signal from the angioblasts, which is required to stimulate the expression of Pax2 and Gdnf, which in turn elicits an inductive signal from the ureteric bud.     

The development of the mouse kidney--embryogenesis writ small.

Kidney development starts with an epithelial bud and a domain of committed mesenchyme inducing one another so that the former gives a bifurcating duct system and the latter nephrons. As these events take place in vitro, the mechanisms underpinning nephrogenesis can be investigated experimentally. Recent work has shown the diversity of regulatory molecules expressed during kidney development and begun to clarify the molecular basis of mesenchyme induction, but there is more to come.     

Cell sorting and chondrogenic aggregate formation in micromass culture

A fundamental feature of cartilage differentiation in the developing limb is the formation of a prechondrogenic cell condensation. An apparently similar process of prechondrogenic cell aggregation occurs in micromass cultures of limb bud mesenchyme with the formation of cellular aggregates which often differentiate into cartilage nodules. We have investigated the process of aggregate formation in micromass culture using chimaeric mixtures of potentially chondrogenic and nonchondrogenic cell types. Two systems were studied: mixtures of distal and proximal limb mesenchyme cells and mixtures of distal limb cells with avian tendon fibroblasts. In both cases cultures of varying proportions of each cell type have been prepared. The results demonstrate that aggregate formation in vitro is the consequence of a cell sorting process which can involve prechondrogenic cells of widely different spatial origins within the developing limb. This contrasts with in vivo prechondrogenic condensation in which there is no evidence of cell sorting (Searls, R.L. (1967), J. Exp. Zool. 166, 39-50). However, our findings do indicate that cell surface differences occur in apparently undifferentiated limb mesenchyme. The results also suggest that mesenchymal cell aggregates must achieve a threshold size before chondrogenesis can proceed. In addition, the results show that under some culture conditions nonchondrogenic cells will form aggregates.     

Nephron formation adopts a novel spatial topology at cessation of nephrogenesis

Nephron number in the mammalian kidney is known to vary dramatically, with postnatal renal function directly influenced by nephron complement. What determines final nephron number is poorly understood but nephron formation in the mouse kidney ceases within the first few days after birth, presumably due to the loss of all remaining nephron progenitors via epithelial differentiation. What initiates this event is not known. Indeed, whether nephron formation occurs in the same way at this time as during embryonic development has also not been examined. In this study, we investigate the key cellular compartments involved in nephron formation; the ureteric tip, cap mesenchyme and early nephrons; from postnatal day (P) 0 to 6 in the mouse. High resolution analyses of gene and protein expression indicate that loss of nephron progenitors precedes loss of ureteric tip identity, but show spatial shifts in the expression of cap mesenchyme genes during this time. In addition, cap mesenchymal volume and rate of proliferation decline prior to birth. Section-based 3D modeling and Optical Projection Tomography revealed a burst of ectopic nephron induction, with the formation of multiple (up to 5) nephrons per ureteric tip evident from P2. While the distal–proximal patterning of these nephrons occurred normally, their spatial relationship with the ureteric compartment was altered. We propose that this phase of nephron formation represents an acceleration of differentiation within the cap mesenchyme due to a displacement of signals within the nephrogenic niche.     

Heparin and heparan sulfate delimit nephron formation in fetal metanephric kidneys

Formation of nephrons from primitive mesenchyme in fetal kidneys is induced by ureteric buds. Nephron induction is closely coordinated with branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud. Having previously shown that branching of the primitive ureter is associated with de novo synthesis of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan and release of free heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycan chains, we asked whether glycosaminoglycans influence nephron development. Fetal mouse kidneys were incubated in organ cultures containing heparan sulfate, heparin, chondroitin sulfate, or hyaluronate. After 48 hr the number of nephrons at each developmental stage was enumerated by light microscopic analysis of serial tissue sections. Kidneys incubated in heparin or in heparan sulfate contained up to 10-fold fewer nephrons than did kidneys incubated in control conditions or in chondroitin sulfate or hyaluronic acid. Maturation of nephrons, however, was unaffected. Inhibition of nephron development was associated with binding of labeled heparin to primitive mesenchyme and altered tissue distribution of fibronectin. Branching morphogenesis was impaired in kidneys exposed to heparin but not to heparan sulfate or to de-N-sulfated, N-acetylated heparin. The capacity of glycosaminoglycans to inhibit nephron formation depended on sugar composition and O-sulfation but not GAG chain size or charge density. Thus, heparan sulfate may have the capacity to specifically control formation of nephrons in fetal metanephric kidneys in vitro.     

Cell lineages in the embryonic kidney: their inductive interactions and signalling molecules.

The first signalling genes acting in the inductive interactions in the kidney have now been identified. Differentiation of the permanent kidney or the metanephros is critically dependent on inductive signalling between the nephrogenic mesenchyme and ureteric bud epithelium. Further inductive interactions occur between developing nephrons, interstitial stroma, endothelial cells and neurones. Glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor is a signal for the ureteric bud initiation and branching, and Wnt4 is an autocrine epithelializing signal at the pretubular stage of nephron formation. The signals for renal angiogenesis and innervation are less well defined, but seem to include vascular endothelial growth factor and neurotrophins, at least. The ureteric-bud-derived signal for induction of the nephrogenic mesenchyme (to bring the cells to the condensate stage) is not yet known, but fibroblast growth factor 2 is a good candidate. None of the signalling genes identified from the embryonic kidney is specific to the organ, which raises some general questions. How do the organs develop from similar rudiments to various patterns with different cell types and functions? Does the information for organ-specific differentiation pathways retain in the epithelial or mesenchymal compartment? The present, rather fragmentary molecular data would favour the view that similar molecules acting in different combinations and developmental sequences, rather than few organ-specific master genes, could be responsible for the divergence of patterning.     

Growth and death in the developing mammalian kidney: signals, receptors and conversations.

Because the kidney (metanephros) starts to function before completing development, its patterning and morphogenesis need to be closely integrated with its growth. This is achieved by blast cells at the kidney periphery generating new nephrons that link up to the extending collecting-duct arborisation, while earlier-formed and more internal nephrons are maturing and beginning to filter serum. This pattern of development requires that cell division and apoptosis be co-ordinated in the various kidney compartments (collecting-ducts, blast cells, metanephric mesenchyme, nephrons and vascular system). The underlying regulatory networks for cell proliferation are beginning to be unravelled, mainly through expression studies, mutation analysis and experimentation in vitro. This article summarises current knowledge of kidney growth and apoptosis, and analyses some of the 80 or so ligand-receptor pairings that seem to sustain development and growth. It also points to some unanswered questions, the most intriguing being what role does apoptosis play during normal kidney development?     

Leukemia inhibitory factor induces DNA synthesis in Swiss mouse 3T3 cells independently of cyclin D1 expression through a mechanism involving MEK/ERK1/2 activation

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and oncostatin M (OSM) induce DNA synthesis in Swiss 3T3 cells through common signaling mechanism(s), whereas other related cytokines such as interleukin-6 and ciliary neurotrophic factor do not cause this response. Induction of DNA replication by LIF or prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) occurs, in part, through different signaling events. LIF and OSM specifically trigger STAT1 cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation, whereas PGF2alpha fails to do so. However, LIF and PGF2alpha can trigger increases in ERK1/2 activity, which are required for their mitogenic responses because U0126, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, prevents both ERK1/2 activation and induction of DNA synthesis by LIF or PGF2alpha treatment. PGF2alpha induces cyclin D expression and full phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein. In contrast, LIF fails to promote increases in cyclin D mRNA/protein levels; consequently, LIF induces DNA synthesis without promoting full phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (Rb). However, both LIF and PGF2alpha increase cyclin E expression. Furthermore, LIF mitogenic action does not involve protein kinase C (PKC) activation, because a PKC inhibitor does not block this effect. In contrast, PKC activity is required for PGF2alpha mitogenic action. More importantly, the synergistic effect between LIF and PGF2alpha to promote S phase entry is independent of PKC activation. These results show fundamental differences between LIF- and PGF2alpha-dependent mechanism(s) that induce cellular entry into S phase. These findings are critical in understanding how LIF and other related cytokine-regulated events participate in normal cell cycle control and may also provide clues to unravel crucial processes underlying cancerous cell division.     

Traction and the formation of mesenchymal condensations in vivo

Although the segregation of mesenchyme into distinct aggregates is the first step in the development of a range of tissues that includes bones, somites, feathers and nephrons, we still know very little about the mechanisms by which this happens. There are two obvious types of explanation: first, that there are global pre-patterns within the mesenchyme whose molecular expression leads to tissue fragmentation and, second, that the condensations arise spontaneously through the local morphogenetic abilities of the cells. The only known mechanism for the latter possibility is cell traction and this paper suggests that current studies are compatible with traction playing a primary role in the formation of nephrogenic condensations in the developing kidney and the separation of somites, but not for the generation of feather rudiments where there is evidence of a prepattern of adhesivity.