Epigenetics of specific chromosome regions

Investigation of protein complexes, various types of protein modifications and the structure of the chromatin of specific chromosome regions, such as centromeres, telomeres, and adjacent heterochromatic regions, considerably complicated the notion on DNA, prevailing five decades ago, as molecules that exclusively control coding and realization of genetic information. Striking plasticity of the primary structure of centromeric and telomeric DNA suggests a variety of molecular mechanisms underlying fundamental and universal functions of these key chromosome regions. The present review is an attempt to consider the current concepts on the structure of the DNA and protein components, as well as the structure of the chromatin of specific chromosome regions in eukaryotes, and the concerted evolution of these components, leading to the formation of a hierarchy of coordinated DNA-protein complexes.     

Telomeric protein distributions and remodeling through the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomeric DNA is protected by a nonnucleosomal protein complex, tethered by the protein Rap1. Rif and Sir proteins, which interact with Rap1p, are thought to have further interactions with conventional nucleosomic chromatin to create a repressive structure that protects the chromosome end. We showed by microarray analysis that Rif1p association with the chromosome ends extends to subtelomeric regions many kilobases internal to the terminal telomeric repeats and correlates strongly with the previously determined genomic footprints of Rap1p and the Sir2-4 proteins in these regions. Although the end-protection function of telomeres is essential for genomic stability, telomeric DNA must also be copied by the conventional DNA replication machinery and replenished by telomerase, suggesting that transient remodeling of the telomeric chromatin might result in distinct protein complexes at different stages of the cell cycle. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we monitored the association of Rap1p, Rif1p, Rif2p, and the protein component of telomerase, Est2p, with telomeric DNA through the cell cycle. We provide evidence for dynamic remodeling of these components at telomeres.     

Proteomic and genomic characterization of chromatin complexes at a boundary

We have dissected specialized assemblies on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome that help define and preserve the boundaries that separate silent and active chromatin. These assemblies contain characteristic stretches of DNA that flank particular regions of silent chromatin, as well as five distinctively modified histones and a set of protein complexes. The complexes consist of at least 15 chromatin-associated proteins, including DNA pol epsilon, the Isw2-Itc1 and Top2 chromatin remodeling proteins, the Sas3-Spt16 chromatin modifying complex, and Yta7, a bromodomain-containing AAA ATPase. We show that these complexes are important for the faithful maintenance of an established boundary, as disruption of the complexes results in specific, anomalous alterations of the silent and active epigenetic states.     

Rings, bracelet or snaps: fashionable alternatives for Smc complexes

The mechanism of higher order chromosome organization has eluded researchers for over 100 years. A breakthrough occurred with the discovery of multi-subunit protein complexes that contain a core of two molecules from the structural maintenance of chromosome (Smc) family. Smc complexes are important structural components of chromosome organization in diverse aspects of DNA metabolism, including sister chromatid cohesion, condensation, global gene repression, DNA repair and homologous recombination. In these different processes, Smc complexes may facilitate chromosome organization by tethering together two parts of the same or different chromatin strands. The mechanism of tethering by Smc complexes remains to be elucidated, but a number of intriguing topological alternatives are suggested by the unusual structural features of Smc complexes, including their large coiled-coil domains and ATPase activities. Distinguishing between these possibilities will require innovative new approaches.     

Experimental condensation inhibition in constitutive and facultative heterochromatin of mammalian chromosomes

What drives the dramatic changes in chromosome structure during the cell cycle is one of the oldest questions in genetics. During mitosis, all chromosomes become highly condensed and, as the cell completes mitosis, most of the chromatin decondenses again. Only chromosome regions containing constitutive or facultative heterochromatin remain in a more condensed state throughout interphase. One approach to understanding chromosome condensation is to experimentally induce condensation defects. 5-Azacytidine (5-aza-C) and 5-azadeoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) drastically inhibit condensation in mammalian constitutive heterochromatin, in particular in human chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and Y, as well as in facultative heterochromatin (inactive X chromosome), when incorporated into late-replicating DNA during the last hours of cell culture. The decondensing effects of 5-aza-C analogs, which do not interfere with normal base pairing in substituted duplex DNA, have been correlated with global DNA hypomethylation. In contrast, decondensation of constitutive heterochromatin by incorporation of 5-iododeoxyuridine (IdU) or other non-demethylating base analogs, or binding of AT-specific DNA ligands, such as berenil and Hoechst 33258, may reflect an altered steric configuration of substituted or minor-groove-bound duplex DNA. Consequently, these compounds exert relatively specific effects on certain subsets of AT-rich constitutive heterochromatin, i.e. IdU on human chromosome 9, berenil on human Y, and Hoechst 33258 on mouse chromosomes, which provide high local concentrations of IdU incorporation sites or DNA-ligand-binding sites. None of these non-demethylating compounds affect the inactive X chromosome condensation. Structural features of chromosomes are largely determined by chromosome-associated proteins. In this light, we propose that both DNA hypomethylation and steric alterations in chromosomal DNA may interfere with the binding of specific proteins or multi-protein complexes that are required for chromosome condensation. The association between chromosome condensation defects, genomic instability, and epigenetic reprogramming is discussed. Chromosome condensation may represent a key ancestral mechanism for modulating chromatin structure that has since been realloted to other nuclear processes.     

Plc1p is required for proper chromatin structure and activity of the kinetochore in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</Emphasis> by facilitating recruitment of the RSC complex

High-fidelity chromosome segregation during mitosis requires kinetochores, protein complexes that assemble on centromeric DNA and mediate chromosome attachment to spindle microtubules. In budding yeast, phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (Plc1p encoded by PLC1 gene) is important for function of kinetochores. Deletion of PLC1 results in alterations in chromatin structure of centromeres, reduced binding of microtubules to minichromosomes, and a higher frequency of chromosome loss. The mechanism of Plc1p’s involvement in kinetochore activity was not initially obvious; however, a testable hypothesis emerged with the discovery of the role of inositol polyphosphates (InsPs), produced by a Plc1p-dependent pathway, in the regulation of chromatin-remodeling complexes. In addition, the remodels structure of chromatin (RSC) chromatin-remodeling complex was found to associate with kinetochores and to affect centromeric chromatin structure. We report here that Plc1p and InsPs are required for recruitment of the RSC complex to kinetochores, which is important for establishing proper chromatin structure of centromeres and centromere proximal regions. Mutations in PLC1 and components of the RSC complex exhibit strong genetic interactions and display synthetic growth defect, altered nuclear morphology, and higher frequency of minichromosome loss. The results thus provide a mechanistic explanation for the previously elusive role of Plc1p and InsPs in kinetochore function. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Structure of telomeric chromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

The telomeric nucleoprotein complex protects linear chromosome ends from degradation. In contrast to most eukaryotes in which telomerase is responsible for telomere elongation by adding short DNA repeats synthesized using an RNA template, the telomere elongation in Drosophila involves transposition of specialized telomeric retroelements onto chromosome ends. Proteins that bind telomeric and subtelomeric sequences form specific telomeric chromatin, and its components are highly conserved among organisms employing different mechanisms of telomere elongation. This review is focused on the analysis of components of the Drosophila telomeric complex and its comparison with telomeric proteins in telomerase-encoded organisms. Structural and functional analysis of Drosophila telomeres suggests that there are three distinct chromatin regions: protective structure at the very end of chromosome (cap), subtelomeric region which is characterized by condensed chromatin structure, and the terminal retrotransposon array whose expression is under the control of an RNAi (RNA interference)-based mechanism. The link between RNAi and telomeric chromatin formation in germinal tissues is discussed.     

Heterochromatin

The properties of heterochromatin are reconsidered in the context of our present understanding of gene silencing, telomeric and centromeric properties, position-effect variegation and X-chromosome inactivation. It is proposed that the chromatin in heterochromatic chromosomal regions is generally similar in its molecular composition to that in silenced chromosomal regions. Heterochromatic appearance hence reflects not a particular quality of the respective chromosomal regions but only a specific kind of chromatin packaging comparable to that required for the inactivation of genes. This packaging may be initiated by particular signals in the DNA but can be propagated over more extended chromosomal regions by the formation of multiprotein complexes that interact with histones and possibly cell-specific additional components (RNA or proteins) that determine the status of the chromosome in a particular cell type. Received: 15 November 1998 / Accepted: 8 December 1998     

Tissue Differences in Antigenic Properties of Non-Histone Protein-DNA Complexes

THAT DNA and histones are not tissue specific^1,2 implies that other components of chromatin may be responsible for the tissue specific control of eukaryotic gene expression. We now report studies of the antigenic properties of non-histone protein-DNA complexes isolated in an undissociated state from native chromatin and compare these with the properties of native chromatin. Because DNA is a very weak immunogen³, the antigenic determinants in these preparations should be principally caused by the protein components.