共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
我国生活垃圾产量大但处理能力不足,产生多种环境危害,对其资源化利用能够缓解环境压力并回收资源。为探讨生活垃圾资源化利用策略,综合生命周期评价与生命周期成本分析方法,建立生态效率模型。以天津市为例,分析和比较焚烧发电、卫生填埋-填埋气发电、与堆肥+卫生填埋3种典型生活垃圾资源化利用情景的生态效率。结果表明,堆肥+卫生填埋情景具有潜在最优生态效率;全球变暖对总环境影响贡献最大,而投资成本对经济影响贡献最大。考虑天津市生活垃圾管理现状,建议鼓励发展生活垃圾干湿组分分离及厨余垃圾堆肥的资源化利用策略。 相似文献
2.
Sustainability-a term originating from silviculture, which was adopted by UNEP as the main political goal for the future development
of humankind-is also the ultimate aim of product development. It comprises three components: environment, economy and social
aspects which have to be properly assessed and balanced if a new product is to be designed or an existing one is to be improved.
The responsibility of the researchers involved in the assessment is to provide appropriate and reliable instruments. For the
environmental part there is already an internationally standardized tool: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Life Cycle Costing
(LCC) is the logical counterpart of LCA for the economic assessment. LCC surpasses the purely economic cost calculation by
taking into account hidden costs and potentially external costs over the life cycle of the product. It is a very important
point that different life-cycle based methods (including Social Life Cycle Assessment) for sustainablity assessment use the
same system boundaries. 相似文献
3.
Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Guido Haas Frank Wetterich Uwe Geier 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2000,5(6):345-348
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a method that can be used to assess the environmental impact of agriculture, but impact categories and the functional unit of classical LCA’s must be adapted to the specific agricultural production process. Serving as an example, the framework of a LCA of 18 grassland dairy farms covering three farming intensity levels and carried out in the Allgäu region in southern Germany is presented. By focussing on the chosen impact categories and the respective, suitable functional units, the specific needs and backgrounds of conducting an agricultural LCA are discussed in general. 相似文献
4.
5.
Goal, Scope and Background The Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) system has been installed at the biggest lignite-fired power generation plant in Thailand
to reduce the large amount of SO2 emission. In order to understand the costs and benefits, both in ecological and economic terms, the lignite-fired plant was
studied both before and after the installation of the FGD system. The focus of this study is to consider not only the Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA) outcome but also the Life Cycle Costing (LCC) factors. The results can provide valuable information
when selecting appropriate technologies to minimize the negative impact that lignite-fired power plants have on the environment.
Methods The Life Cycle Assessment - Numerical Eco-load Total Standardization (LCA-NETS) system was used to evaluate the impact on
the environment of both the lignite-fired plant and the FGD system. Life Cycle Costing (LCC) was used to provide a comparison
between alternative before and after installation of FGD. LCC, a powerful analytical tool, examines the total cost, in net
present value terms, of a FGD system over its entire service lifetime.
Results and Discussion The results of the study are shown in the eco-load values over the entire life cycle of the lignite-fired plant. Comparative
models of the power plant, before and after the installation of the FGD system, are evaluated using the LCA-NETS system. The
results indicate that the installation of the FGD system can reduce the acidification problem associated with lignite-fired
plants by approximately 97%. The LCC estimation shows the major costs of the FGD system: capital investment, operating and
maintenance, and miscellaneous costs. The LCC provides the decision-making information when considering the cost of the FGD
system in terms of protecting the environment.
Conclusion and Outlook LCA is an important decision-making tool for environmental policies, especially with regard to the selection of pollution
control equipment for lignite-fired plants. Green coal technologies and strategies to reduce the negative impact on the environment
are essential to produce more environmentally-friendly power plants with a sustainable future. 相似文献
6.
Remediation of contaminated sites provides a cleaner local environment, but may also have negative environmental impacts on the local, regional, and global scales. Methods based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are designed to take the negative effects into consideration when deciding how to treat a site, and to improve the environmental efficiency of remediation techniques. This paper reviews nine case studies that use LCA tools to evaluate alternative remediation techniques to summarize the findings of methodologies and results. The methodologies were found to differ in the limitation of the LCA for space, time and secondary processes. This strongly influenced the results. Bioremediation was the worst when the secondary process of producing electron acceptors was included; otherwise it was the best. The choice of impact categories heavily affected the results. Inclusion of land use was especially important in site remediation studies. In general, the negative impact of site remediation was due to energy consumption. For excavation combined with ex-situ treatment, the transport of contaminated soil to the treatment facility or landfill required the most energy. For in-situ treatment of soil and groundwater, pumping consumed the most energy. It is proposed that different methods be applied to the same site. 相似文献
7.
Andreas Ciroth Marcel Hagelüken Guido W. Sonnemann Francesc Castells Günter Fleischer 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2002,7(6):363-368
Goal and Background Geographical and technological differences in Life Cycle Inventory data are an important source for uncertainty in the result
of Life Cycle Assessments. Knowledge on their impact on the result of an LCA is scarce, and also knowledge on how to manage
them in an LCA case study.
Objective Goal of this paper is to explore these differences for municipal solid waste incinerator plants, and to develop recommendations
for managing technological and geographical differences.
Methodology The paper provides a definition of technological and geographical differences, and analyses their possible impacts. In a case
study, the differences are caused intentionally in ‘games’, by virtually transplanting incineration plants to a different
location and by changing parameters such as the composition of the waste input incinerated. The games are performed by using
a modular model for municipal solid waste incinerator plants. In each case, an LCA including an Impact Assessment is calculated
to trace the impact of these changes, and the results are compared.
Conclusions The conclusions of the paper are two-fold: (1) reduce the differences in inventory data where their impact on the result is
high; where it is possible reducing them to a great extent, and the effort for performing the change acceptable; in the case
of incineration plants: Adapt the flue gas treatment, especially a possible DeNOx step, to the real conditions; (2) make use
of modular process models that allow adapting plant parameters to better meet real conditions, but be aware of possible modelling
errors. We invite the scientific community to validate the model used for a waste incinerator plant, and suggest putting up
similar models for other processes, preferably those of similar relevance for Life Cycle Inventories. 相似文献
8.
Conceptión Jiménez-González Seungdo Kim Michael R. Overcash 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2000,5(3):153-159
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology evaluates holistically the environmental consequences of a product system or activity,
by quantifying the energy and materials used, the wastes released to the environment, and assessing the environmental impacts
of those energy, materials and wastes. Despite the international focus on environmental impact and LCA, the quality of the
underlying life cycle inventory data is at least as, if not more, important than the more qualitative LCA process.
This work presents an option to generate gate-to-gate life cycle information of chemical substances, based on a transparent
methodology of chemical engineering process design (an ab initio approach). In the broader concept of a Life Cycle Inventory
(LCI), the information of each gate-to-gate module can be linked accordingly in a production chain, including the extraction
of raw materials, transportation, disposal, reuse, etc. to provide a full cradle to gate evaluation. The goal of this article
is to explain the methodology rather than to provide a tutorial on the techniques used. This methodology aims to help the
LCA practitioner to obtain a fair and transparent estimate of LCI data when the information is not readily available from
industry or literature. Results of gate-to-gate life cycle information generated using the cited methodology are presented
as a case study.
It has been our experience that both LCI and LCA information provide valuable means of understanding the net environmental
consequence of any technology. The LCI information from this methodology can be used more directly in exploring engineering
and chemistry changes to improve manufacturing processes. The LCA information can be used to set broader policy and to look
at more macro improvements for the environment. 相似文献
9.
Duane A. Tolle David P. Evers Bruce W. Vigon John J. Sheehan 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2000,5(6):374-384
This study provides a benchmark of the life cycle environmental impact characteristics associated with a typical soybased
ink used for sheetfed lithographic printing. The scope ineluded a streamlined Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and Impact Assessment
(LCIA). Materials, processes, and life cycle stages that are the same between different printing inks, or were less than one
percent by mass of the printing system input materials, were excluded. The LCIA included identification of specific processes
in the life cycle of soy-based ink printing that make the greatest contribution to the overall environmental hazard potential
in 13 impact categories for the baseline printing system selected. The LCIA approach included both regional scaling for areas
that differ in sensitivity to certain impact indicators and normalization against a reference value. Reduction in the use
of tall oil rosin and switching from conventional to low or no-till farming appear to be promising opportunities for reducing
the environmental hazard potential. 相似文献
10.
LCA in Japan: policy and progress 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
David Hunkeler Itaru Yasui Ryoichi Yamamoto 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》1998,3(3):124-130
A summary of the current Japanese activities related to Life Cycle Assessment are presented with a specific comparison of Life Cycle Impact Assessment in relation to European tendencies. Japanese organizations involved in LCA, recent legislation impacting LCA activities and LCA case studies are also tabulated. The LCA priorities of policy makers and industrialists are discussed in comparison and compared to those in the United States. Projects within the Life Cycle Assessment Society of Japan and the Man-Earth Project are highlighted including the construction of a public LCI data base and the prediction of 21st century environmental crises. 相似文献
11.
Jong-Hwan Eun Ji-Ho Son Jeong-Min Moon Jong-Shik Chung 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2009,14(4):364-373
Background, aim, and scope As the sustainability improvement becomes an essential business task of industry, a number of companies are adopting IT-based
environmental information systems (EIS). Life cycle assessment (LCA), a tool to improve environmental friendliness of a product,
can also be systemized as a part of the EIS. This paper presents a case of an environmental information system which is integrated
with online LCA tool to produce sets of hybrid life cycle inventory and examine its usefulness in the field application of
the environmental management.
Main features Samsung SDI Ltd., the producer of display panels, has launched an EIS called Sustainability Management Initiative System (SMIS).
The system comprised modules of functions such as environmental management system (EMS), green procurement (GP), customer
relation (e-VOC), eco-design, and LCA. The LCA module adopted the hybrid LCA methodology in the sense that it combines process
LCA for the site processes and input–output (IO) LCA for upstream processes to produce cradle-to-gate LCA results. LCA results
from the module are compared with results of other LCA studies made by the application of different methodologies. The advantages
and application of the LCA system are also discussed in light of the electronics industry.
Results and discussion LCA can play a vital role in sustainability management by finding environmental burden of products in their life cycle. It
is especially true in the case of the electronics industry, since the electronic products have some critical public concerns
in the use and end-of-life phase. SMIS shows a method for hybrid LCA through online data communication with EMS and GP module.
The integration of IT-based hybrid LCA in environmental information system was set to begin in January 2006. The advantage
of the comparing and regular monitoring of the LCA value is that it improves the system completeness and increases the reliability
of LCA. By comparing the hybrid LCA and process LCA in the cradle-to-gate stage, the gap between both methods of the 42-in.
standard definition plasma display panel (PDP) ranges from 1% (acidification impact category) to −282% (abiotic resource depletion
impact category), with an average gap of 68.63%. The gaps of the impact categories of acidification (AP), eutrophication (EP),
and global warming (GWP) are relatively low (less than 10%). In the result of the comparative analysis, the strength of correlation
of three impact categories (AP, EP, GWP) shows that it is reliable to use the hybrid LCA when assessing the environmental
impacts of the PDP module. Hybrid LCA has its own risk on data accuracy. However, the risk is affordable when it comes to
the comparative LCA among different models of similar product line of a company. In the results of 2 years of monitoring of
42-in. Standard definition PDP, the hybrid LCA score has been decreased by 30%. The system also efficiently shortens man-days
for LCA study per product. This fact can facilitate the eco-design of the products and can give quick response to the customer's
inquiry on the product's eco-profile. Even though there is the necessity for improvement of process data currently available,
the hybrid LCA provides insight into the assessments of the eco-efficiency of the manufacturing process and the environmental
impacts of a product.
Conclusions and recommendations As the environmental concerns of the industries increase, the need for environmental data management also increases. LCA shall
be a core part of the environmental information system by which the environmental performances of products can be controlled.
Hybrid type of LCA is effective in controlling the usual eco-profile of the products in a company. For an industry, in particular
electronics, which imports a broad band of raw material and parts, hybrid LCA is more practicable than the classic LCA. Continuous
efforts are needed to align input data and keep conformity, which reduces data uncertainty of the system. 相似文献
12.
Bente Solberg-Johansen Roland Clift Andrew Jeapes 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》1997,2(1):16-19
One of the main shortcomings of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) when applied to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle, is that there is currently
no recognised procedure to deal with radionuclide emissions in the Impact Assessment stage. A framework which considers both
human and environmental impacts is required and a methodology which is compatible with the other impact assessment approaches
in LCA must be developed. It is important that the discussion is not only restricted to concepts, but that a working methodology
is developed which can be readily applied by LCA practitioners. A provisional method is available for assessing radiological
impacts on human health, but no consideration has been given to potential effects on the environment. A methodology is proposed
in this paper which assesses irradiation of the environment using Environmental Increments (EI) as the quality standard. This
approach is based on the same principles as for the Ecotoxicity classification group, and it represents a working methodology
which can be continuously improved as knowledge in the area increases. 相似文献
13.
An extended life cycle analysis of packaging systems for fruit and vegetable transport in Europe 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Stefan Albrecht Peter Brandstetter Tabea Beck Pere Fullana-i-Palmer Kaisa Grönman Martin Baitz Sabine Deimling Julie Sandilands Matthias Fischer 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2013,18(8):1549-1567
Purpose
The year-round supply of fresh fruit and vegetables in Europe requires a complex logistics system. In this study, the most common European fruit and vegetable transport packaging systems, namely single-use wooden and cardboard boxes and re-useable plastic crates, are analyzed and compared considering environmental, economic, and social impacts.Methods
The environmental, economic, and social potentials of the three transport packaging systems are examined and compared from a life cycle perspective using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Life Cycle Working Environment (LCWE) methodologies. Relevant parameters influencing the results are analyzed in different scenarios, and their impacts are quantified. The underlying environmental analysis is an ISO 14040 and 14044 comparative Life Cycle Assessment that was critically reviewed by an independent expert panel.Results and discussion
The results show that wooden boxes and plastic crates perform very similarly in the Global Warming Potential, Acidification Potential, and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential categories; while plastic crates have a lower impact in the Eutrophication Potential and Abiotic Resource Depletion Potential categories. Cardboard boxes show the highest impacts in all assessed categories. The analysis of the life cycle costs show that the re-usable system is the most cost effective over its entire life cycle. For the production of a single crate, the plastic crates require the most human labor. The share of female employment for the cardboard boxes is the lowest. All three systems require a relatively large share of low-qualified employees. The plastic crate system shows a much lower lethal accident rate. The higher rate for the wooden and cardboard boxes arises mainly from wood logging. In addition, the sustainability consequences due to the influence of packaging in preventing food losses are discussed, and future research combining aspects both from food LCAs and transport packing/packaging LCAs is recommended.Conclusions
For all three systems, optimization potentials regarding their environmental life cycle performance were identified. Wooden boxes (single use) and plastic crates (re-usable) show preferable environmental performance. The calibration of the system parameters, such as end-of-life treatment, showed environmental optimization potentials in all transport packaging systems. The assessment of the economic and the social dimensions in parallel is important in order to avoid trade-offs between the three sustainability dimensions. Merging economic and social aspects into a Life Cycle Assessment is becoming more and more important, and their integration into one model ensures a consistent modeling approach for a manageable effort. 相似文献14.
Sabrina Spatari Michael Betz Harald Florin Martin Baitz Michael Faltenbacher 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2001,6(2):81-84
The growing availability of software tools has increased the speed of generating LCA studies. Databases and visual tools for
constructing material balance modules greatly facilitate the process of analyzing the environmental aspects of product systems
over their life cycle. A robust software tool, containing a large LCI dataset and functions for performing LCIA and sensitivity
analysis will allow companies and LCA practitioners to conduct systems analyses efficiently and reliably. This paper discusses
how the GaBi 3 software tool can be used to perform LCA and Life Cycle Engineering (LCE), a methodology that combines life
cycle economic, environmental, and technology assessment. The paper highlights important attributes of LCA software tools,
including high quality, well-documented data, transparency in modeling, and data analysis functionality. An example of a regional
power grid mix model is used to illustrate the versatility of GaBi 3. 相似文献
15.
John R. Barton Andreas Schneider Johannes Jager 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》2002,7(1):11-17
Establishing BAT (Best Available Techniques) for processes subject to IPPC is a new barrier and one that processes in the
development stage need to be aware of. For multi-functional processes, the sectorial approach adopted under IPPC (Integrated
Pollution Prevention and Control) increases the potential problems. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an established tool to
assist establishing BAT but is difficult to apply in its full form at the Research and Development (R&D) stage. A review of
LCA in the context of a case study, the Trefoil kiln process, concludes that it has the flexibility to cope with multi-functionality
and that use of key environmental issues and key indicators could overcome the informational gaps. Environmental burdens can
be presented appropriately provided the research identifies appropriate allocation methods. The use of LCA thinking provided
useful insight on the content of the research programme. 相似文献
16.
Verena Gswein Carla Rodrigues Jos D. Silvestre Fausto Freire Guillaume Habert Jakob Knig 《Journal of Industrial Ecology》2020,24(1):178-192
The built environment is the largest single emitter of CO2 and an important consumer of energy. Much research has gone into the improved efficiency of building operation and construction products. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is commonly used to assess existing buildings or building products. Classic LCA, however, is not suited for evaluating the environmental performance of developing technologies. A new approach, anticipatory LCA (a‐LCA), promises various advantages and can be used as a design constraint during the product development stage. It helps overcome four challenges: (i) data availability, (ii) stakeholder inclusion, (iii) risk assessment, and (iv) multi‐criteria problems. This article's contribution to the line of research is twofold: first, it adapts the a‐LCA approach for construction‐specific purposes in theoretical terms for the four challenges. Second, it applies the method to an innovative prefabricated modular envelope system, the CleanTechBlock (CTB), focusing on challenge (i). Thirty‐six CTB designs are tested and compared to conventional walls. Inclusion of technology foresight is achieved through structured scenario analysis. Moreover, challenge (iv) is tackled through the analysis of different environmental impact categories, transport‐related impacts, and thickness of the wall assemblies of the CTB. The case study results show that optimized material choice and product design is needed to reach the lowest environmental impact. Methodological findings highlight the importance of context‐specific solutions and the need for benchmarking new products. 相似文献
17.
Shirish Sangle P. Ram Babu P. Khanna 《The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment》1999,4(4):221-228
A new method for identification of weights of environmental issues is suggested using the societal approach in the context
of a weighting step in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The weights assigned by different economic groups to eleven environmental
issues is obtained through analysis of linguistically stated relative rankings using a fuzzy partial ordering method. The
system identification technique based on neural networks is used to identify logical connective in the stated relative rankings
and this obviated the inconsistency problem normally encountered in the analysis of relative preference statements. The transitive
property of a matrix of relative weights is used to minimise the number of responses to be elicited from a respondent. 相似文献
18.
The application of the methodology Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is time-consuming and expensive. A definite interpretation,
furthermore, is not always derivable from the determined results. The reason for the leeway of interpretation is frequently
due to the imprecision and uncertainty of the ingoing data. An improved clearance of interpretation is to be expected by an
ecological evaluation of methodology with the support of fuzzy-sets. The influence of uncertainties of ingoing data on evaluation
results becomes transparent through a representation as fuzzy-sets. Thus, the interpretation of an uncertainty of assessment
results is reduced in comparison to usual procedures for environmental LCA thus far. Time and cost saving is to be expected
from the fact that the extensive quantification of many energy and mass flows is replaced by a fuzzy-set supported iteration
loop, with which only the exact quantification of a few important flows is necessary. 相似文献
19.
Allocation in Life Cycle Inventory Analysis for Joint Production 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Allocation in joint production is still one of the unresolved and often discussed methodological issues in Life Cycle Inventory
Analysis. Using the many years of experience of man agement sciences, a new classification scheme is proposed. It is postulated
that companies perform allocation in joint production in view of optimising the products’ performance (economic and/ or environmental),
which helps them to maximise their profits. Therefrom it is derived that value judgements and negotiations are inevitable.
The proposed classification scheme differentiates between the number of decision-makers involved, and the type of markets
for joint products. Several decision-makers have to find fair allocation factors for their commonly operated joint production,
whereas individual decision-makers may choose allocation factors considering the (economic and/ or environmental) competitiveness
of their joint products. Applied on the case of a small-scale gas-fuelled combined heat and power plant, the methodology proposed
shows a strong dependency on the disutility function, i.e., private costs, environmental damage costs or a combination of
the two.
Presentation and Introduction of this set of articles see Int. J. LCA 4 (3) 175–179 (1999) 相似文献
20.
Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) results are typically reported as individual scores, or as a breakdown of the most direct inputs; either as absolute values or relative scores. It is proposed to report not only the direct or primary LCIA scores, but also the impacts from secondary and tertiary processes. A graphical technique to report LCIA results is described where a combination of pie and donut charts, with the inner most layer representing direct impacts and subsequent outer layers representing preceding indirect impacts, is presented. An MS-EXCEL spread sheet is presented where the methods and outcomes are shown. This can then be used to display LCIA results. It is possible to present both primary and indirect impacts in a single figure. Significant indirect impacts contributing to the total score of an LCA are clearly visible. 相似文献