DNA replication and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin

The role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in chromatin replication and the activity of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase in the newly synthesized and old chromatin was studied. It was found that 3-aminobenzamide, which is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase, had no effect on the initiation of DNA synthesis and only a moderate effect on DNA chain elongation. However, poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase activity in the newly replicated chromatin was two to three times higher than that of the unreplicated chromatin.     

Chromosomal protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in pancreatic nucleosomes

When pancreatic chromatin fragments were prepared and resolved in the presence of 80 mM NaCl, endogenous poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity was found to be maximal in nucleosome periodicities of four to five units and did not respond to any further increases in nucleosomal architecture. Furthermore, in nucleosome complexities spanning 1 through 14 and over unit lengths, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on acid-urea and acid-urea-Triton gels has shown pancreatic histone H1 to be the only actively ADP-ribosylated histone species. The extent of ADP-ribosylation of histone H1 was also demonstrated to retard the protein's mobility in acid-urea, acid-urea-Triton, and lithium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels and to consist of at least 12 distinct ADP-ribosylated species extractable in all nucleosome complexities studied. Finally, extraction and subsequent electrophoresis of total chromosomal proteins in the presence of lithium dodecyl sulfate also evidenced heavy ADP-ribosylation at the level of nonhistone chromosomal proteins of the high mobility group comigrating in the core histone region, as well as in the topmost region of the gels where poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase was found to form a poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated aggregate.     

Modulation of chromatin structure by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a nuclear enzyme that is highly conserved in eucaryotes. Its activity is totally dependent on the presence of DNA containing single or double stranded breaks. We have shown that this activation results in a decondensation of chromatin superstructure in vitro, which is caused mainly by hyper(ADP-ribosy)ation of histone H1. In core particles, the modification of histone H2B leads to a partial dissociation of DNA from core histones. The conformational change of native chromatin by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is reversible upon degradation of the histone H1-bound poly(ADP-ribose) by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase. We propose that cuts produced in vivo on DNA during DNA repair activate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, which then synthesizes poly(ADP-ribose) on histone H1, in particular, and contributes to the opening of the 25-nm chromatin fiber, resulting in the increased accessibility of DNA to excision repair enzymes. This mechanism is fast and reversible.     

A role for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in DNA methylation.

The aberrant DNA methylation of promoter regions of housekeeping genes leads to gene silencing. Additional epigenetic events, such as histone methylation and acetylation, also play a very important role in the definitive repression of gene expression by DNA methylation. If the aberrant DNA methylation of promoter regions is the starting or the secondary event leading to the gene silencing is still debated. Mechanisms controlling DNA methylation patterns do exist although they have not been ultimately proven. Our data suggest that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation might be part of this control mechanism. Thus an additional epigenetic modification seems to be involved in maintaining tissue and cell-type methylation patterns that when formed during embryo development, have to be rigorously conserved in adult organisms.     

50 Years of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

The seminal paper published in 1963 by Chambon, Weil and Mandel reporting a new NAD-dependent protein modification now known as poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) marked the launch of a new era in both protein research and cell biology. In the coming decades, the identity, biochemical characteristics and regulation of enzymes responsible for the synthesis and degradation of protein-bound poly(ADP-ribose) have been discovered and the surprisingly multifarious biological roles of PARylation have not ceased to amaze cell and molecular biologists ever since. The review series on PARylation following this preface is comprised of ten papers written by great experts of the field and aims to provide practicing physicians and basic scientists with the state-of-the-art on the “writers, readers and erasers” of poly(ADP-ribose), some recent paradigm shifts of the field and its translational potential.     

New readers and interpretations of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), a protein post-translational modification that was originally connected to the DNA damage response, is now known to engage in a continuously increasing number of biological processes. Despite extensive research and ceaseless, important findings about its role and mode of action, poly(ADP-ribose) remains an enigma regarding its structural complexity and diversity. The recent identification and structural characterization of four different poly(ADP-ribose) binding motifs represents a quantum leap in the comprehension of how this molecule can be decoded. Moreover, the recent discovery of a direct connection between PARylation and poly-ubiquitylation in targeting proteins for degradation by the proteasome has paved the way for a new interpretation of this protein modification. These two novel aspects, poly(ADP-ribose) recognition and readout by the ubiquitylation/proteasome system are developed here.     

Distribution of protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation systems across all domains of life

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a post-translational modification of proteins involved in regulation of many cellular pathways. Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) consists of chains of repeating ADP-ribose nucleotide units and is synthesized by the family of enzymes called poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs). This modification can be removed by the hydrolytic action of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) and ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 (ARH3). Hydrolytic activity of macrodomain proteins (MacroD1, MacroD2 and TARG1) is responsible for the removal of terminal ADP-ribose unit and for complete reversion of protein ADP-ribosylation.Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is widely utilized in eukaryotes and PARPs are present in representatives from all six major eukaryotic supergroups, with only a small number of eukaryotic species that do not possess PARP genes. The last common ancestor of all eukaryotes possessed at least five types of PARP proteins that include both mono and poly(ADP-ribosyl) transferases. Distribution of PARGs strictly follows the distribution of PARP proteins in eukaryotic species. At least one of the macrodomain proteins that hydrolyse terminal ADP-ribose is also always present. Therefore, we can presume that the last common ancestor of all eukaryotes possessed a fully functional and reversible PAR metabolism and that PAR signalling provided the conditions essential for survival of the ancestral eukaryote in its ancient environment.PARP proteins are far less prevalent in bacteria and were probably gained through horizontal gene transfer. Only eleven bacterial species possess all proteins essential for a functional PAR metabolism, although it is not known whether PAR metabolism is truly functional in bacteria. Several dsDNA viruses also possess PARP homologues, while no PARP proteins have been identified in any archaeal genome.Our analysis of the distribution of enzymes involved in PAR metabolism provides insight into the evolution of these important signalling systems, as well as providing the basis for selection of the appropriate genetic model organisms to study the physiology of the specific human PARP proteins.     

Reconstitution and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of proteolytically fragmented poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase

Calf thymus poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase (Mr = 120,000) is cleaved with papain into two fragments of M(r) = 74,000 and 46,000 and also split with chymotrypsin into two fragments of M(r) = 66,000 and 54,000. Each fragment purified to homogeneity is enzymatically inactive, but combined incubation of the 74,000 and 46,000 fragments in the presence of DNA restored 20% of the enzyme activity. In contrast, combined incubation of the 66,000 and 54,000 fragments does not restore any enzyme activity. In the former incubation, autopoly(ADP-ribosyl)ation reaction occurs exclusively on the 74,000 fragment. When each fragment is incubated with [adenine-U-14C]NAD in the presence of DNA and a catalytic amount of the native enzyme, poly(ADP-ribosyl)action occurs in the overlapped portion (22,000) of the 66,000 fragment and the 74,000 fragment. Nevertheless, the purified 22,000 fragment is a poor acceptor for poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. The degree of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of the proteolytic fragments is significantly reduced by increasing NaCl concentration, probably due to the lack of the interaction between the enzyme fragments and DNA. These results, taken together, indicate that DNA is indispensable for the reconstitution of the catalytic activity as well as the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of the fragmented enzyme.     

The role of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in the adaptive response

An involvement of the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation system in the expression of the adaptive response has been demonstrated with inhibitors of the nuclear enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. This enzyme is a key component of a reaction cycle in chromatin, involving dynamic synthesis and degradation of variably sized ADP-ribose polymers in response to DNA strand breaks. The present report reviews recent work focussing on the response of the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation system in low dose adaptation. The results suggest that adaptation of human cells to minute concentrations of an alkylating agent involves a different activation mechanism for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase than DNA break-mediated stimulation after high dose treatment. Moreover, adaptation induces the formation of branched polymers with a very high binding affinity for histone tails and selected other proteins. High dose challenge treatment of adapted cells further enhances formation of branched polymers. We propose that apart from sensing DNA nicks, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase may be part of pathway protecting cells from downstream events of DNA damage.     

Central role for the Werner syndrome protein/poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 complex in the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation pathway after DNA damage

A defect in the Werner syndrome protein (WRN) leads to the premature aging disease Werner syndrome (WS). Hallmark features of cells derived from WS patients include genomic instability and hypersensitivity to certain DNA-damaging agents. WRN contains a highly conserved region, the RecQ conserved domain, that plays a central role in protein interactions. We searched for proteins that bound to this region, and the most prominent direct interaction was with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1), a nuclear enzyme that protects the genome by responding to DNA damage and facilitating DNA repair. In pursuit of a functional interaction between WRN and PARP-1, we found that WS cells are deficient in the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation pathway after they are treated with the DNA-damaging agents H2O2 and methyl methanesulfonate. After cellular stress, PARP-1 itself becomes activated, but the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of other cellular proteins is severely impaired in WS cells. Overexpression of the PARP-1 binding domain of WRN strongly inhibits the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation activity in H2O2-treated control cell lines. These results indicate that the WRN/PARP-1 complex plays a key role in the cellular response to oxidative stress and alkylating agents, suggesting a role for these proteins in the base excision DNA repair pathway.     

The interrelationships among poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, DNA synthesis and mammary gland differentiation

Because mammary epithelium from virgin mice must undergo DNA synthesis prior to differentiation and because poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation has been linked to the cell cycle, it was hypothesized that this requirement for DNA synthesis might be related to the poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of nuclear proteins. However, 3-methoxybenzamide, an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, stimulates alpha-lactalbumin accumulation even when added after DNA replication is completed. Furthermore, in parous mice this compound is still effective when DNA synthesis is blocked by cytosine arabinoside-beta-D-arabinofuranoside. Therefore, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation appears to be associated, not with DNA synthesis, but with some other event in mammary gland differentiation.     

Mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase by cholera toxin.

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PADPRP) was found to be an efficient protein acceptor for the arginine-specific ADP-ribosylation reaction catalyzed by cholera toxin (CT). The covalent modification of PADPRP was carried out with [32P]2'-dNAD as a selective mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation substrate. Mono(2'-dADP-ribosyl)ated-PADPRP was identified by autoradiographic analysis of the CT reaction products following sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Addition of recombinant ADP-ribosylation factor (rARF), a small GTP-binding protein that stimulates the enzymatic activity of CT, enhanced the mono(2'-dADP-ribosyl)ation of PADPRP in a time- and substrate-dependent manner. In contrast, rARF did not change the ADP-ribose polymerizing activity of PADPRP. Peptide mapping mapping of [32P] labeled (2'-dADP-ribose)-PADPRP, following partial proteolysis with papain, revealed that the DNA-binding domain of PADPRP contained the mono(2'-dADP-ribosyl)ated arginine residue(s). Our results are consistent with the conclusion that PADPRP is susceptible to arginine-specific mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation catalyzed by CT.     

Inhibition of Crm1-p53 interaction and nuclear export of p53 by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) and p53 are two key proteins in the DNA-damage response. Although PARP-1 is known to poly(ADP-ribosyl)ate p53, the role of this modification remains elusive. Here, we identify the major poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated sites of p53 by PARP-1 and find that PARP-1-mediated poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation blocks the interaction between p53 and the nuclear export receptor Crm1, resulting in nuclear accumulation of p53. These findings molecularly link PARP-1 and p53 in the DNA-damage response, providing the mechanism for how p53 accumulates in the nucleus in response to DNA damage. PARP-1 becomes super-activated by binding to damaged DNA, which in turn poly(ADP-ribosyl)ates p53. The nuclear export machinery is unable to target poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated p53, promoting accumulation of p53 in the nucleus where p53 exerts its transactivational function.     

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of DNA polymerase beta in vitro

DNA polymerase beta purified from bovine thymus is markedly inhibited when incubated in a reconstituted poly(ADP-ribosyl)ating reaction system. Analyses of the reaction product synthesized in this system by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subsequent fluorography of the gel indicated that ADP-ribose is covalently attached to DNA polymerase beta molecule (Mr = 44,000).