Mechanism of gate opening in the 20S proteasome by the proteasomal ATPases

Substrates enter the cylindrical 20S proteasome through a gated channel that is regulated by the ATPases in the 19S regulatory particle in eukaryotes or the homologous PAN ATPase complex in archaea. These ATPases contain a conserved C-terminal hydrophobic-tyrosine-X (HbYX) motif that triggers gate opening upon ATP binding. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we identified the sites in the archaeal 20S where PAN's C-terminal residues bind and determined the structures of the gate in its closed and open forms. Peptides containing the HbYX motif bind to 20S in the pockets between neighboring alpha subunits where they interact with conserved residues required for gate opening. This interaction induces a rotation in the alpha subunits and displacement of a reverse-turn loop that stabilizes the open-gate conformation. This mechanism differs from that of PA26/28, which lacks the HbYX motif and does not cause alpha subunit rotation. These findings demonstrated how the ATPases' C termini function to facilitate substrate entry.     

Interactions of PAN's C‐termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome–ATPase interactions

Protein degradation in the 20S proteasome is regulated in eukaryotes by the 19S ATPase complex and in archaea by the homologous PAN ATPase ring complex. Subunits of these hexameric ATPases contain on their C‐termini a conserved hydrophobic‐tyrosine‐X (HbYX) motif that docks into pockets in the 20S to stimulate the opening of a gated substrate entry channel. Here, we report the crystal structure of the archaeal 20S proteasome in complex with the C‐terminus of the archaeal proteasome regulatory ATPase, PAN. This structure defines the detailed interactions between the critical C‐terminal HbYX motif and the 20S α‐subunits and indicates that the intersubunit pocket in the 20S undergoes an induced‐fit conformational change on binding of the HbYX motif. This structure together with related mutagenesis data suggest how in eukaryotes certain proteasomal ATPases bind to specific pockets in an asymmetrical manner to regulate gate opening.     

The C terminus of Rpt3, an ATPase subunit of PA700 (19 S) regulatory complex, is essential for 26 S proteasome assembly but not for activation

PA700, the 19 S regulatory subcomplex of the 26 S proteasome, contains a heterohexameric ring of AAA subunits (Rpt1 to -6) that forms the binding interface with a heteroheptameric ring of α subunits (α1 to -7) of the 20 S proteasome. Binding of these subcomplexes is mediated by interactions of C termini of certain Rpt subunits with cognate binding sites on the 20 S proteasome. Binding of two Rpt subunits (Rpt2 and Rpt5) depends on their last three residues, which share an HbYX motif (where Hb is a hydrophobic amino acid) and open substrate access gates in the center of the α ring. The relative roles of other Rpt subunits for proteasome binding and activation remain poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that the C-terminal HbYX motif of Rpt3 binds to the 20 S proteasome but does not promote proteasome gating. Binding requires the last three residues and occurs at a dedicated site on the proteasome. A C-terminal peptide of Rpt3 blocked ATP-dependent in vitro assembly of 26 S proteasome from PA700 and 20 S proteasome. In HEK293 cells, wild-type Rpt3, but not Rpt3 lacking the HbYX motif was incorporated into 26 S proteasome. These results indicate that the C terminus of Rpt3 was required for cellular assembly of this subunit into 26 S proteasome. Mutant Rpt3 was assembled into intact PA700. This result indicates that intact PA700 can be assembled independently of association with 20 S proteasome and thus may be a direct precursor for 26 S proteasome assembly under normal conditions. These results provide new insights to the non-equivalent roles of Rpt subunits in 26 S proteasome function and identify specific roles for Rpt3.     

Structural Models for Interactions between the 20S Proteasome and Its PAN/19S Activators

Proteasome activity is regulated by sequestration of its proteolytic centers in a barrel-shaped structure that limits substrate access. Substrates enter the proteasome by means of activator complexes that bind to the end rings of proteasome α subunits and induce opening of an axial entrance/exit pore. The PA26 activator binds in a pocket on the proteasome surface using main chain contacts of its C-terminal residues and uses an internal activation loop to trigger gate opening by repositioning the proteasome Pro-17 reverse turn. Subunits of the unrelated PAN/19S activators bind with their C termini in the same pockets but can induce proteasome gate opening entirely from interactions of their C-terminal peptides, which are reported to cause gate opening by inducing a rocking motion of proteasome α subunits rather than by directly contacting the Pro-17 turn. Here we report crystal structures and binding studies of proteasome complexes with PA26 constructs that display modified C-terminal residues, including those corresponding to PAN. These findings suggest that PA26 and PAN/19S C-terminal residues bind superimposably and that both classes of activator induce gate opening by using direct contacts to residues of the proteasome Pro-17 reverse turn. In the case of the PAN and 19S activators, a penultimate tyrosine/phenylalanine residue contacts the proteasome Gly-19 carbonyl oxygen to stabilize the open conformation.     

ATP binding to PAN or the 26S ATPases causes association with the 20S proteasome, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded proteins

The archaeal ATPase complex PAN, the homolog of the eukaryotic 26S proteasome-regulatory ATPases, was shown to associate transiently with the 20S proteasome upon binding of ATP or ATPgammaS, but not ADP. By electron microscopy (EM), PAN appears as a two-ring structure, capping the 20S, and resembles two densities in the 19S complex. The N termini of the archaeal 20S alpha subunits were found to function as a gate that prevents entry of seven-residue peptides but allows entry of tetrapeptides. Upon association with the 20S particle, PAN stimulates gate opening. Although degradation of globular proteins requires ATP hydrolysis, the PAN-20S complex with ATPgammaS translocates and degrades unfolded and denatured proteins. Rabbit 26S proteasomes also degrade these unfolded proteins upon ATP binding, without hydrolysis. Thus, although unfolding requires energy from ATP hydrolysis, ATP binding alone supports ATPase-20S association, gate opening, and translocation of unfolded substrates into the proteasome, which can occur by facilitated diffusion through the ATPase.     

C termini of proteasomal ATPases play nonequivalent roles in cellular assembly of mammalian 26 S proteasome

The 26 S proteasome comprises two multisubunit subcomplexes as follows: 20 S proteasome and PA700/19 S regulatory particle. The cellular mechanisms by which these subcomplexes assemble into 26 S proteasome and the molecular determinants that govern the assembly process are poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate the nonequivalent roles of the C termini of six AAA subunits (Rpt1-Rpt6) of PA700 in 26 S proteasome assembly in mammalian cells. The C-terminal HbYX motif (where Hb is a hydrophobic residue, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) of each of two subunits, Rpt3 and Rpt5, but not that of a third subunit Rpt2, was essential for assembly of 26 S proteasome. The C termini of none of the three non-HbYX motif Rpt subunits were essential for cellular 26 S proteasome assembly, although deletion of the last three residues of Rpt6 destabilized the 20 S-PA700 interaction. Rpt subunits defective for assembly into 26 S proteasome due to C-terminal truncations were incorporated into intact PA700. Moreover, intact PA700 accumulated as an isolated subcomplex when cellular 20 S proteasome content was reduced by RNAi. These results indicate that 20 S proteasome is not an obligatory template for assembly of PA700. Collectively, these results identify specific structural elements of two Rpt subunits required for 26 S proteasome assembly, demonstrate that PA700 can be assembled independently of the 20 S proteasome, and suggest that intact PA700 is a direct intermediate in the cellular pathway of 26 S proteasome assembly.     

ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle

In the eukaryotic 26S proteasome, the 20S particle is regulated by six AAA ATPase subunits and, in archaea, by a homologous ring complex, PAN. To clarify the role of ATP in proteolysis, we studied how nucleotides bind to PAN. Although PAN has six identical subunits, it binds ATPs in pairs, and its subunits exhibit three conformational states with high, low, or no affinity for ATP. When PAN binds two ATPγS molecules or two ATPγS plus two ADP molecules, it is maximally active in binding protein substrates, associating with the 20S particle, and promoting 20S gate opening. However, binding of four ATPγS molecules reduces these functions. The 26S proteasome shows similar nucleotide dependence. These findings imply an ordered cyclical mechanism in which two ATPase subunits bind ATP simultaneously and dock into the 20S. These results can explain how these hexameric ATPases interact with and "wobble" on top of the heptameric 20S proteasome.     

Proteasomes and their associated ATPases: a destructive combination

Protein degradation by 20S proteasomes in vivo requires ATP hydrolysis by associated hexameric AAA ATPase complexes such as PAN in archaea and the homologous ATPases in the eukaryotic 26S proteasome. This review discusses recent insights into their multistep mechanisms and the roles of ATP. We have focused on the PAN complex, which offers many advantages for mechanistic and structural studies over the more complex 26S proteasome. By single-particle EM, PAN resembles a "top-hat" capping the ends of the 20S proteasome and resembles densities in the base of the 19S regulatory complex. The binding of ATP promotes formation of the PAN-20S complex, which induces opening of a gate for substrate entry into the 20S. PAN's C-termini, containing a conserved motif, docks into pockets in the 20S's alpha ring and causes gate opening. Surprisingly, once substrates are unfolded, their translocation into the 20S requires ATP-binding but not hydrolysis and can occur by facilitated diffusion through the ATPase in its ATP-bound form. ATP therefore serves multiple functions in proteolysis and the only step that absolutely requires ATP hydrolysis is the unfolding of globular proteins. The 26S proteasome appears to function by similar mechanisms.     

Differential roles of the COOH termini of AAA subunits of PA700 (19 S regulator) in asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome

The 26 S proteasome is an energy-dependent protease that degrades proteins modified with polyubiquitin chains. It is assembled from two multi-protein subcomplexes: a protease (20 S proteasome) and an ATPase regulatory complex (PA700 or 19 S regulatory particle) that contains six different AAA family subunits (Rpt1 to -6). Here we show that binding of PA700 to the 20 S proteasome is mediated by the COOH termini of two (Rpt2 and Rpt5) of the six Rpt subunits that constitute the interaction surface between the subcomplexes. COOH-terminal peptides of either Rpt2 or Rpt5 bind to the 20 S proteasome and activate hydrolysis of short peptide substrates. Simultaneous binding of both COOH-terminal peptides had additive effects on peptide substrate hydrolysis, suggesting that they bind to distinct sites on the proteasome. In contrast, only the Rpt5 peptide activated hydrolysis of protein substrates. Nevertheless, the COOH-terminal peptide of Rpt2 greatly enhanced this effect, suggesting that proteasome activation is a multistate process. Rpt2 and Rpt5 COOH-terminal peptides cross-linked to different but specific subunits of the 20 S proteasome. These results reveal critical roles of COOH termini of Rpt subunits of PA700 in the assembly and activation of eukaryotic 26 S proteasome. Moreover, they support a model in which Rpt subunits bind to dedicated sites on the proteasome and play specific, nonequivalent roles in the asymmetric assembly and activation of the 26 S proteasome.     

Unlocking the proteasome door

How proteasomal ATPases stimulate the gate opening of 20S proteasomes is a longstanding question. In the September 7 issue of Molecular Cell, Smith et al. (2007) describe the conserved "HbYX" motif as the key to proteasome gate opening.     

The Archaeal Proteasome Is Regulated by a Network of AAA ATPases

The proteasome is the central machinery for targeted protein degradation in archaea, Actinobacteria, and eukaryotes. In its basic form, it consists of a regulatory ATPase complex and a proteolytic core particle. The interaction between the two is governed by an HbYX motif (where Hb is a hydrophobic residue, Y is tyrosine, and X is any amino acid) at the C terminus of the ATPase subunits, which stimulates gate opening of the proteasomal α-subunits. In archaea, the proteasome-interacting motif is not only found in canonical proteasome-activating nucleotidases of the PAN/ARC/Rpt group, which are absent in major archaeal lineages, but also in proteins of the CDC48/p97/VAT and AMA groups, suggesting a regulatory network of proteasomal ATPases. Indeed, Thermoplasma acidophilum, which lacks PAN, encodes one CDC48 protein that interacts with the 20S proteasome and activates the degradation of model substrates. In contrast, Methanosarcina mazei contains seven AAA proteins, five of which, both PAN proteins, two out of three CDC48 proteins, and the AMA protein, function as proteasomal gatekeepers. The prevalent presence of multiple, distinct proteasomal ATPases in archaea thus results in a network of regulatory ATPases that may widen the substrate spectrum of proteasomal protein degradation.     

ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation

To clarify the role of ATP in proteolysis, we studied archaeal 20S proteasomes and the PAN (proteasome-activating nucleotidase) regulatory complex, a homolog of the eukaryotic 19S ATPases. PAN's ATPase activity was stimulated similarly by globular (GFPssrA) and unfolded (casein) substrates, and by the ssrA recognition peptide. Denaturation of GFPssrA did not accelerate its degradation or eliminate the requirement for PAN and ATP. During degradation of one molecule of globular or unfolded substrates, 300-400 ATP molecules were hydrolyzed. An N-terminal deletion in the 20S alpha subunits caused opening of the substrate-entry channel and rapid degradation of unfolded proteins without PAN; however, degradation of globular GFPssrA still required PAN's ATPase activity, even after PAN-catalyzed unfolding. Thus, substrate binding activates ATP hydrolysis, which promotes three processes: substrate unfolding, gate opening in the 20S, and protein translocation.     

Stable incorporation of ATPase subunits into 19 S regulatory particle of human proteasome requires nucleotide binding and C-terminal tails

The 26 S proteasome is a large multi-subunit protein complex that degrades ubiquitinated proteins in eukaryotic cells. Proteasome assembly is a complex process that involves formation of six- and seven-membered ring structures from homologous subunits. Here we report that the assembly of hexameric Rpt ring of the 19 S regulatory particle (RP) requires nucleotide binding but not ATP hydrolysis. Disruption of nucleotide binding to an Rpt subunit by mutation in the Walker A motif inhibits the assembly of the Rpt ring without affecting heterodimer formation with its partner Rpt subunit. Coexpression of the base assembly chaperones S5b and PAAF1 with mutant Rpt1 and Rpt6, respectively, relieves assembly inhibition of mutant Rpts by facilitating their interaction with adjacent Rpt dimers. The mutation in the Walker B motif which impairs ATP hydrolysis does not affect Rpt ring formation. Incorporation of a Walker B mutant Rpt subunit abrogates the ATPase activity of the 19 S RP, suggesting that failure of the mutant Rpt to undergo the conformational transition from an ATP-bound to an ADP-bound state impairs conformational changes in the other five wild-type Rpts in the Rpt ring. In addition, we demonstrate that the C-terminal tails of Rpt subunits possessing core particle (CP)-binding affinities facilitate the cellular assembly of the 19 S RP, implying that the 20 S CP may function as a template for base assembly in human cells. Taken together, these results suggest that the ATP-bound conformational state of an Rpt subunit with the exposed C-terminal tail is competent for cellular proteasome assembly.     

The ATP Costs and Time Required to Degrade Ubiquitinated Proteins by the 26 S Proteasome

The degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by 26 S proteasomes requires ATP hydrolysis. To investigate if the six proteasomal ATPases function independently or in a cyclic manner, as proposed recently, we used yeast mutants that prevent ATP binding to Rpt3, Rpt5, or Rpt6. Although proteasomes contain six ATPase subunits, each of these single mutations caused a 66% reduction in basal ATP hydrolysis, and each blocked completely the 2–3-fold stimulation of ATPase activity induced by ubiquitinated substrates. Therefore, the ATPase subunits must function in a ordered manner, in which each is required for the stimulation of ATPase activity by substrates. Although ATP is essential for multiple steps in proteasome function, when the rate of ATP hydrolysis was reduced incrementally, the degradation of Ub₅-DHFR (where Ub is ubiquitin and DHFR is dihydrofolate reductase) decreased exactly in parallel. This direct proportionality implies that a specific number of ATPs is consumed in degrading a ubiquitinated protein. When the ubiquitinated DHFR was more tightly folded (upon addition of the ligand folate), the rate of ATP hydrolysis was unchanged, but the time to degrade a Ub₅-DHFR molecule (∼13 s) and the energy expenditure (50–80 ATPs/Ub₅-DHFR) both increased by 2-fold. With a mutation in the ATPase C terminus that reduced gate opening into the 20 S proteasome, the energy costs and time required for conjugate degradation also increased. Thus, different ubiquitin conjugates activate similarly the ATPase subunit cycle that drives proteolysis, but polypeptide structure determines the time required for degradation and thus the energy cost.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Rpt1p, an ATPase subunit of 26 S proteasome, by proteasome-dedicated chaperone Hsm3p

The 26 S proteasome is a 2.5-MDa molecular machine that degrades ubiquitinated proteins in eukaryotic cells. It consists of a proteolytic core particle and two 19 S regulatory particles (RPs) composed of 6 ATPase (Rpt) and 13 non-ATPase (Rpn) subunits. Multiple proteasome-dedicated chaperones facilitate the assembly of the proteasome, but little is known about the detailed mechanisms. Hsm3, a 19 S RP dedicated chaperone, transiently binds to the C-terminal domain of the Rpt1 subunit and forms a tetrameric complex, Hsm3-Rpt1-Rpt2-Rpn1, during maturation of the ATPase ring of 19 S RP. To elucidate the structural basis of Hsm3 function, we determined the crystal structures of Hsm3 and its complex with the C-terminal domain of the Rpt1 subunit (Rpt1C). Hsm3 has a C-shaped structure that consists of 11 HEAT repeats. The structure of the Hsm3-Rpt1C complex revealed that the interacting surface between Hsm3 and Rpt1 is a hydrophobic core and a complementary charged surface. Mutations in the Hsm3-Rpt1 surface resulted in the assembly defect of the 26 S proteasome. Furthermore, a structural model of the Hsm3-Rpt ring complex and an in vitro binding assay suggest that Hsm3 can bind Rpt2 in addition to Rpt1. Collectively, our results provide the structural basis of the molecular functions of Hsm3 for the RP assembly.     

The 20S Proteasome as an Assembly Platform for the 19S Regulatory Complex

26S proteasomes consist of cylindrical 20S proteasomes with 19S regulatory complexes attached to the ends. Treatment with high concentrations of salt causes the regulatory complexes to separate into two sub-complexes, the base, which is in contact with the 20S proteasome, and the lid, which is the distal part of the 19S complex. Here, we describe two assembly intermediates of the human regulatory complex. One is a dimer of the two ATPase subunits, Rpt3 and Rpt6. The other is a complex of nascent Rpn2, Rpn10, Rpn11, Rpn13, and Txnl1, attached to preexisting 20S proteasomes. This early assembly complex does not yet contain Rpn1 or any of the ATPase subunits of the base. Thus, assembly of 19S regulatory complexes takes place on preexisting 20S proteasomes, and part of the lid is assembled before the base.     

Misfolded PrP impairs the UPS by interaction with the 20S proteasome and inhibition of substrate entry

Prion diseases are associated with the conversion of cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) to toxic β-sheet isoforms (PrP(Sc)), which are reported to inhibit the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Accordingly, UPS substrates accumulate in prion-infected mouse brains, suggesting impairment of the 26S proteasome. A direct interaction between its 20S core particle and PrP isoforms was demonstrated by immunoprecipitation. β-PrP aggregates associated with the 20S particle, but did not impede binding of the PA26 complex, suggesting that the aggregates do not bind to its ends. Aggregated β-PrP reduced the 20S proteasome's basal peptidase activity, and the enhanced activity induced by C-terminal peptides from the 19S ATPases or by the 19S regulator itself, including when stimulated by polyubiquitin conjugates. However, the 20S proteasome was not inhibited when the gate in the α-ring was open due to a truncation mutation or by association with PA26/PA28. These PrP aggregates inhibit by stabilising the closed conformation of the substrate entry channel. A similar inhibition of substrate entry into the proteasome may occur in other neurodegenerative diseases where misfolded β-sheet-rich proteins accumulate.     

ATP-induced structural transitions in PAN, the proteasome-regulatory ATPase complex in Archaea

ATP binding to the PAN-ATPase complex in Archaea or the homologous 19 S protease-regulatory complex in eukaryotes induces association with the 20 S proteasome and opening of its substrate entry channel, whereas ATP hydrolysis allows unfolding of globular substrates. To clarify the conformational changes associated with ATP binding and hydrolysis, we used protease sensitivity to monitor the conformations of the PAN ATPase from Methanococcus jannischii. Exhaustive trypsin treatment of PAN generated five distinct fragments, two of which differed when a nucleotide (either ATP, ATP gamma S, or ADP) was bound. Surprisingly, the nucleotide concentrations altering protease sensitivity were much lower (K(a) 20-40 microm) than are required for ATP-dependent protein breakdown by the PAN-20S proteasome complex (K(m) approximately 300-500 microm). Unlike trypsin, proteinase K yielded several fragments that differed in the ATP gamma S and ADP-bound forms, and thus revealed conformational transitions associated with ATP hydrolysis. Mapping the fragments generated by each revealed that nucleotide binding and hydrolysis induce local conformational changes, affecting the Walker A and B nucleotide-binding motif, as well as global changes extending to its carboxyl terminus. The location and overlap of the fragments also suggest that the conformation of the six subunits is not identical, probably because they do not all bind ATP simultaneously. Partial nucleotide occupancy was supported by direct assays, which demonstrated that, at saturating conditions, only four nucleotides are bound to hexameric PAN. Using the protease protection maps, we modeled the conformational changes associated with ATP binding and hydrolysis in PAN based on the x-ray structures of the homologous AAA ATPase, HslU.     

Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S Regulator of the 26 S Proteasome, Reveal Relative Roles of AAA Subunits in 26 S Proteasome Assembly and Activation and ATPase Activity

We have identified, purified, and characterized three subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulatory complex of the 26 S proteasome. These subcomplexes (denoted PS-1, PS-2, and PS-3) collectively account for all subunits present in purified PA700 but contain no overlapping components or significant levels of non-PA700 proteins. Each subcomplex contained two of the six AAA subunits (Rpt1–6) that form the binding interface of PA700 with the 20 S proteasome, the protease component of the 26 S proteasome. Unlike intact PA700, no individual PA700 subcomplex displayed ATPase activity or proteasome activating activity. However, both activities were manifested by ATP-dependent in vitro reconstitution of PA700 from the subcomplexes. We exploited functional reconstitution to define and distinguish roles of different PA700 subunits in PA700 function by selective alteration of subunits within individual subcomplexes prior to reconstitution. Carboxypeptidase treatment of either PS-2 or PS-3, subcomplexes containing specific Rpt subunits previously shown to have important roles in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation, inhibited these processes but did not affect PA700 reconstitution or ATPase activity. Thus, the intact C termini of both subunits are required for 26 S proteasome assembly and activation but not for PA700 reconstitution. Surprisingly, carboxypeptidase treatment of PS-1 also inhibited 26 S proteasome assembly and activation upon reconstitution with untreated PS-2 and PS-3. These results suggest a previously unidentified role for other PA700 subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation. Our results reveal relative structural and functional relationships among the AAA subunits of PA700 and new insights about mechanisms of 26 S proteasome assembly and activation.The 26 S proteasome is a 2,500,000-Da protease complex that degrades polyubiquitylated proteins by an ATP-dependent mechanism (1, 2). The biochemical processes required for this function are divided between two subcomplexes that compose the holoenzyme (3, 4). The first, called 20 S proteasome or core particle, is a 700,000-Da complex that catalyzes peptide bond hydrolysis (5). The second, called PA700 or 19 S regulatory particle, is a 700,000-Da complex that mediates multiple aspects of proteasome function related to initial binding and subsequent delivery of substrates to the catalytic sites of the 20 S proteasome (6). The 20 S proteasome is composed of 28 subunits representing the products of 14 genes arranged in four axially stacked heteroheptameric rings (7, 8). Each of the two center β rings contains three different protease subunits that utilize N-terminal threonine residues as catalytic nucleophiles (5, 8, 9). These residues line an interior lumen formed by the stacked rings and thus are sequestered from interaction with substrates by a shell of 20 S proteasome subunits.PA700 is composed of 20 different subunits. Six of these subunits, termed Rpt1–6, are AAA² (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) family members that confer ATPase activity to the complex and mediate energy-dependent proteolysis by the 26 S proteasome (2, 10). 26 S proteasome assembly from PA700 and 20 S proteasome requires ATP binding to Rpt subunits (11–15). Binding of PA700 to the 20 S proteasome occurs at an axial interface between a heterohexameric ring of the PA700 Rpt subunits and the heteroheptameric outer ring of α-type 20 S proteasome subunits (16). Substrates enter the proteasome through a pore in the center of the α subunit ring that is reversibly gated by conformationally variable N-terminal residues of certain α subunits in response to PA700 binding (12, 17–19). Although the degradation of polyubiquitylated proteins requires additional ATP hydrolysis-dependent actions by PA700, the assembled 26 S proteasome displays greatly increased rates of energy-independent degradation of short peptides by virtue of their increased access to catalytic sites via diffusion through the open pore (15, 18, 20).Recently, specific interactions between Rpt and α subunits that determine PA700-20 S proteasome binding and gate opening have been defined. These findings established nonequivalent roles among the six different Rpt subunits for these processes (12, 19). For example, carboxypeptidase A treatment of PA700 selectively cleaves the C termini of two Rpt subunits (Rpt2 and Rpt5) and renders PA700 incompetent for proteasome binding and activation (19). Remarkably, short peptides corresponding to the C terminus of either Rpt2 or Rpt5, but none of the other Rpt subunits, were sufficient to bind to the 20 S proteasome and activate peptide substrate hydrolysis by inducing gate opening (12, 15, 18). The C-terminal peptides of Rpt2 and Rpt5 appear to bind to different and distinct sites on the proteasome and produce additive effects on rates of peptide substrate hydrolysis, suggesting that pore size or another feature of gating can be variably modulated (19). These various results, however, do not specify whether the action of one or the other or both C-terminal peptides is essential for function of intact PA700.In addition to its role in activation, PA700 plays other essential roles in 26 S proteasome function related to substrate selection and processing. For example, PA700 captures polyubiquitylated proteins via multiple subunits that bind polyubiquitin chains (21–23). Moreover, to ensure translocation of the bound ubiquitylated protein through the narrow opened substrate access pore for proteolysis, PA700 destabilizes the tertiary structure of the protein via chaperone-like activity and removes polyubiquitin chains via deubiquitylating activities of several different subunits (24–30). These various functions appear to be highly coordinated and may be mechanistically linked to one another and to the hydrolysis of ATP by Rpt subunits during substrate processing.Despite support for this general model of PA700 action, there is a lack of detailed knowledge about how PA700 subunits are structurally organized and functionally linked. Previously, we identified and characterized a subcomplex of PA700 called “modulator” that contained two ATPase subunits, Rpt4 and Rpt5, and one non-ATPase subunit, p27 (31). Although this protein was identified by an assay that measured increased PA700-dependent proteasome activation, the mechanistic basis of this effect was not clear. Moreover, the modulator lacked detectable ATPase activity and proteasome activating activity. The latter feature is surprising in retrospect because of the newly identified capacity of Rpt5 to activate the proteasome directly (12, 19). This disparity suggests that specific interactions among multiple PA700 subunits determine the manifestation and regulation of various activities.This study extends our recent findings regarding relative roles of Rpt subunits in the regulation of proteasome function. It also provides new insights and significance to older work that identified and characterized the modulator as a subcomplex of PA700. Our findings unite two different lines of investigation to offer new information about the structure, function, and regulation of 26 S proteasome. They also offer insights about alternative models for assembly of PA700 and 26 S proteasome in intact cells.     

An atomic model AAA-ATPase/20S core particle sub-complex of the 26S proteasome

The 26S proteasome is the most downstream element of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway of protein degradation. It is composed of the 20S core particle (CP) and the 19S regulatory particle (RP). The RP consists of 6 AAA-ATPases and at least 13 non-ATPase subunits. Based on a cryo-EM map of the 26S proteasome, structures of homologs, and physical protein-protein interactions we derive an atomic model of the AAA-ATPase-CP sub-complex. The ATPase order in our model (Rpt1/Rpt2/Rpt6/Rpt3/Rpt4/Rpt5) is in excellent agreement with the recently identified base-precursor complexes formed during the assembly of the RP. Furthermore, the atomic CP-AAA-ATPase model suggests that the assembly chaperone Nas6 facilitates CP-RP association by enhancing the shape complementarity between Rpt3 and its binding CP alpha subunits partners.