The use of estradiol and/or GnRH in a two-dose PGF protocol for breeding management of beef heifers

The objective was to determine reproductive performance following AI in beef heifers given estradiol to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose PGF-based protocol. In Experiment 1, 561 cycling (confirmed by ultrasonography), Angus heifers received 500 microg cloprostenol, i.m. (PGF) twice, 14 days apart (days 0 and 14) and were equally allocated to four groups in a 2 x 2 factorial design. On Day 7, heifers received either 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 50 mg progesterone (P), i.m. in oil (EBP group) or no treatment (NT group). Half the heifers in each group received 1mg EB, i.m. in oil on Day 15 (24h after the second PGF treatment) with TAI 28 h later (52 h after PGF), and the other half received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. on Day 17 (72 h after PGF) concurrent with TAI. All heifers were observed for estrus twice daily from days 13 to 17; those detected in estrus more than 16 h before scheduled TAI were inseminated 4-16 h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Overall pregnancy rate (approximately 35 days after AI) was higher in heifers that received EBP than those that did not (61.6% versus 48.2%, respectively; P < 0.002); but was lower in heifers that received EB after PGF than those that received GnRH (50.0% versus 59.8%; P < 0.02). Although estrus was detected prior to TAI in 77 of 279 heifers (27.6%) treated with EBP (presumably due to induced luteolysis), they were inseminated and 53.2% became pregnant. Overall pregnancy rates were 51.4, 68.3, 45.0, and 55.0% in the NT/GnRH, EBP/GnRH, NT/EB, and EBP/EB groups, respectively (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, 401 cycling, Angus heifers were used. The design was identical to Experiment 1, except that 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) plus 50mg progesterone (E-17betaP) and 1mg E-17beta were used in lieu of EBP and EB, respectively. All heifers receiving E-17beta 24h after the second injection of PGF (NT/E-17beta and E-17betaP/E-17beta) were TAI 28 h later without estrus detection, i.e. 52 h after PGF. Heifers in the other two groups received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. 72 h after PGF and were concurrently TAI; heifers in these two groups that were detected in estrus prior to this time were inseminated 4-12h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Estrus rate during the first 72 h after the second PGF treatment was higher (P < 0.05) in the E-17betaP/GnRH group (45.0%; n = 100) than in the NT/GnRH group (16.0%; n = 100), but conception rate following estrus detection and AI was not different (mean, 57.4%; P = 0.50). Overall pregnancy rate was not significantly different among groups (mean, 46.9%; P = 0.32). In summary, the use of EB or E-17beta to synchronize follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose, PGF-based protocol resulted in acceptable fertility to TAI. However, when 2mg EB was used to synchronize follicular wave emergence, early estrus occurred in approximately 28% of heifers, necessitating additional estrus detection. A combination of estrus detection and timed-AI in a two-dose PGF protocol resulted in highly acceptable pregnancy rates.     

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows, II: assigning protocols according to stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus

Pregnancy rates were compared in lactating dairy cows (n = 1083) assigned to protocols for resynchronization of ovulation based on stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows were detected not pregnant by ultrasonography 30 d after a previous AI (study day 0) and classified as diestrus, metestrus, proestrus, with ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows in diestrus (January-May) were assigned to either Ovsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, GnRH day 9, and timed-AI [TAI] 16 h later; n = 96), or Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, estradiol cypionate [ECP] day 1, AI at detected estrus [AIDE] on day 2, or TAI on day 3; n = 96). Cows in diestrus (June-December) were assigned to either Ovsynch (n = 156) or Modified Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, ECP day 1, AIDE days 2 and 3, and to Ovsynch on day 4 if not detected in estrus; n = 142). Cows in metestrus were assigned either to Ovsynch (n = 68), Heatsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, ECP day 8, AIDE day 9, or TAI day 10; n = 62), or GnRH + Ovsynch (GnRH on day 0, followed by Ovsynch on day 8; n = 64). Cows in proestrus, with ovarian cysts, or anestrus were assigned to either Ovsynch (proestrus n = 89, ovarian cysts n = 97, anestrus n = 8) or GnRH + Ovsynch (proestrus n = 87, ovarian cysts n = 109, anestrus n = 9). Pregnancy rate was evaluated 30, 55 and 90 d after resynchronized AI. For cows in diestrus (January-May), pregnancy rates were higher for Ovsynch (35.9, 29.2 and 26.0%) than for Quicksynch (21.7, 16.7 and 15.6%). For cows in diestrus (June-December), pregnancy rates were similar for Ovsynch (34.4, 24.0 and 23.6%) and Modified Quicksynch (27.1, 26.2 and 21.6%). For cows in metestrus, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (33.3, 24.5 and 20.3%) than for Heatsynch (20.3, 12.9 and 9.8%). For cows with ovarian cysts, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (30.3, 26.6 and 22.9%) than for Ovsynch (20.2, 18.5 and 14.7%). Assignment to resynchronization protocols based on the stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts improved pregnancy rates.     

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows III. Administration of GnRH 23 days post AI and ultrasonography for nonpregnancy diagnosis on day 30

The objective was to compare pregnancy rates to resynchronization and timed AI (TAI) protocols in lactating dairy cows that received GnRH at 23 d and were diagnosed not pregnant at 30 d after the pre-enrollment AI. Nonpregnant cows (624) at ultrasonography on day 30 (study day 0) were classified as diestrus (74.8%), metestrus (5.6%) and without a CL (19.5%). Cows in diestrus were assigned either to the GnRH group (PGF2alpha on day 0, GnRH on day 2 and TAI 16 h later, n = 238) or the estradiol cypionate (ECP) group (PGF2alpha on day 0, ECP on day 1, and TAI 36 h later, n = 229). Cows in metestrus were assigned to the Modified Heatsynch Group (GnRH on day 0, PGF(2alpha) on day 7, ECP on day 8 and TAI on day 9, n = 35). Cows without a CL (n = 122) were classified either as proestrus (10.6%), ovarian cysts (7.5%) or anestrus (1.4%), and assigned to factorial treatments (i.e., use of GnRH versus CIDR) to either the GnRH group (GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16 h later, n = 28), the CIDR group (CIDR insert from days 0 to 7, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16 h later, n = 34), the GnRH + CIDR group (GnRH on day 0, CIDR insert from days 0 to 7, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16h later, n = 32), and the control group (PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16 h later, n = 28). For cows without a CL, plasma P4 concentrations were determined on days 0, 7, 10 and 17 and ovarian structures determined on days 0, 7 and 17. Pregnancy rates were evaluated at 30, 55 and 90 d after the resynchronized AI. For cows in diestrus, there were no differences in pregnancy rates on days 30, 55 and 90 for cows in the GnRH (27.5, 26.5 and 24.2%) or ECP (29.1, 25.5 and 24.1%) groups. In addition, there were no differences in pregnancy losses between days 30 and 55 and 55 and 90 between the GnRH (7.0 and 8.6%) and ECP (9.8 and 5.4%) groups. For cows without a CL, GnRH on day 0 increased the proportion of cows with a CL on days 7 and 17 and plasma P4 concentration on day 17 in cows with ovarian cysts but not for cows in proestrus. The CIDR insert increased pregnancy rate in cows with ovarian cysts but reduced pregnancy rate for cows in proestrus.     

The effect of a progesterone (P4) intravaginal device (CIDR) on resynchronisation of oestrus and embryonic loss in previously timed inseminated dairy heifers

A study was done to evaluate the effect of using progesterone (P4) intravaginal device (CIDR: controlled internal drug-releasing dispenser) to synchronise the return to oestrus of previously timed inseminated (TAI) dairy heifers, and to evaluate embryo survival and pregnancy rate (PR) in the return to oestrus heifers. At the onset of the artificial insemination (AI) breeding period (day -9), heifers were randomly assigned into two groups (treated group CGPG, n = 79) and (control group GPG, n = 83). Every heifer in both groups was injected with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and prostaglandin F2-alpha (PGF2α) as follows: GnRH on day -9; PGF2α on day -2; GnRH and TAI on day 0. Heifers in both groups received TAI within 30 min after the second GnRH injection. Artificial insemination at first breeding was conducted for all heifers during 55 days from day 0. On day 14 after timed insemination, every heifer in the CGPG group received CIDR device for 6 days. Within 3 days after CIDR removal, more heifers in CGPG group showed oestrus within 1.9 days compared to heifers that showed oestrus within 2.9 days in the control. Within 10 days after CIDR removal, more heifers in the CGPG group showed oestrus within 2.4 days compared to heifers that showed oestrus within 6.7 days in the control. PRs on days 30 and 55 were not different between both groups, while PR on day 55 during September were higher (P = 0.032) in CGPG group (58.0%) than GPG group (37.0%). In addition, PR from first to second AI was higher (P = 0.037) for CGPG group (79.8%) than for GPG group (65.1%) but it was similar after that. Pregnancy losses between days 30 and 55 tended to be lower (P = 0.089) for the CGPG group (12.7%) compared to 25.1% for the GPG group. Interval between first and second AI was lower (P = 0.052) for the CGPG group (27.5 ± 1.6 days) compared to 31.6 ± 1.3 days for heifers in the GPG group but no differences were detected for intervals from second to third AI and from third to fourth AI between the two groups. Number of services per pregnancy was not different between CGPG and GPG groups. Results indicate that the CIDR device improved synchronisation to return to oestrus and increased PR to first AI during high temperature months by reducing embryonic losses.     

Resynchronization of previously timed-inseminated beef heifers with progestins

The objective was to determine the efficacy of a previously used CIDR or melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5mg/head/day) for resynchronization of estrus in beef heifers not pregnant to timed-AI (TAI). In three experiments and a field trial, heifers were reinseminated 6-12 h after first detection of estrus. Pregnancy diagnosis was done from approximately 25-43 days after either TAI or reinsemination. In Experiment 1, 79 heifers received a once-used CIDR from 13 to 20 days after TAI and 80 heifers were untreated controls. For these two groups, there were 34 and 35 heifers, respectively, not pregnant to TAI; median +/- S.E. intervals from TAI to onset of estrus were 22 +/- 0.2 days versus 20 +/- 0.6 days (P < 0.001); estrus rates were 70.6% versus 85.7% (P = 0.1); conception rates were 62.5% versus 76.7% (P < 0.3); and pregnancy rates were 44.1% versus 65.7% (P = 0.07), for CIDR and untreated (control) groups, respectively. In Experiment 2, heifers (n = 651) were TAI (Day 0) and 13 days later randomly assigned to one of seven groups (n = 93 per group) to receive a once-used CIDR (three groups; Days 13-20), MGA (three groups; Days 13-19), or no treatment (control group). Groups given a CIDR or MGA also received: no further treatment (CIDR or MGA alone); 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) and 50 mg progesterone (P4) in 2 mL canola oil on Day 13; or E-17beta and P4 on Day 13 and 0.5 mg E-17beta on Day 21 (24 h after CIDR removal or 48 h after the last feeding of MGA). Pregnancy rate to TAI was lowest (P < 0.05) for the group given a CIDR plus E-17beta and P4 on Day 13 and E-17beta on Day 21. Variability in return to estrus was greater (P < 0.001) in the control and MGA groups than in CIDR groups. Conception and pregnancy rates in heifers given a CIDR (65.1 and 61.4%) were higher (P<0.01) than those fed MGA (49.6 and 40.4%), but not different from controls (62.2 and 54.9%, respectively). In Experiment 3, 616 heifers received a once- or twice-used CIDR for 7 days, beginning 13+/-1 days after TAI, with or without a concurrent injection of 150 mg of P4 (2 x 2 factorial design). Pregnancy rate to TAI was 47.2%. In heifers that returned to estrus, there was no significant difference between a once- or twice-used CIDR for rates of estrus (68.8%, P < 0.3), conception (65.9%, P < 0.6) and pregnancy (45.3%, P < 0.8). Injecting progesterone at CIDR insertion increased the median interval from CIDR removal to onset of estrus (P < 0.05) and reduced rates of estrus (63.8% versus 73.8%, P<0.05), conception (60.5% versus 70.6%, P = 0.1) and pregnancy (38.6% versus 52.2%, P < 0.02). In a field trial, 983 heifers received a once-used CIDR for 7 days, beginning 13 +/- 1 days after TAI. Pregnancy rate to TAI was 55.2%. The median (and mode) of the interval from CIDR removal to estrus was 2.5 days. Estrus, conception and pregnancy rates were 78.2, 70.3 and 55.0% (overall pregnancy rate to TAI and rebreeding, 78.7%). In summary, a once- or twice-used CIDR for 7 days, starting 13 +/- 1 days after TAI resulted in the majority of nonpregnant heifers detected in estrus over a 4-day interval, with acceptable conception rates; however, injecting progesterone at CIDR insertion significantly reduced both estrus and pregnancy rates, and estradiol treatment after CIDR removal was associated with a decreased pregnancy rate to TAI. Fertility was higher in heifers resynchronized with a once-used CIDR than with MGA.     

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows and heifers resynchronized for a second insemination with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device for 7 or 8d with estradiol benzoate injected at the time of device insertion and 24h after removal

One aim of this study was to compare the reproductive performance of cows and heifers when resynchronizing returns to estrus for a second insemination by treating with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (IVD) for 7 or 8d when estradiol benzoate (EB) was administered at the start of treatment and again 24h after device removal. An additional aim was to document the pattern of onset and characteristics of estrus with each resynchrony treatment. Lactating cows in three herds were synchronized for a first estrus and AI by treatment with an IVD for 8d, starting on Day 0, cloprostenol (0.5 mg im) at device removal and EB at device insertion (2.0 mg im) and 24h after removal (1.0 mg im). Cows were resynchronized for a second estrus starting on Day 23 by reinsertion of IVDs for 7 (IVD-7-EB; n=449) or 8d (IVD-8-EB; n=445) with EB (1.0 mg im) administered at device insertion and 24h after removal. Cows were resynchronized for a third estrus by administration of EB (1.0 mg im) on Day 46, but subsequent treatments (no further treatment, reinsertion of CIDR or administration of EB on Day 55) varied among herds as part of separate studies. Maiden heifers (7-Day, n=68; 8-Day, n=69) were similarly treated as cows in a separate herd, but doses of EB were always 1.0 mg im at device insertion and 0.75 mg im 24h after removal. Heifers were not resynchronized for a third estrus. Cattle were inseminated on detection of estrus at each synchronized estrus. Cumulative pregnancy rates 4 week (66.0%, 276/418 versus 59.1%, 247/418) and 7 week (72.7%, 304/418 versus 67.7%, 283/418) after the start of AI were greater (P<0.05) in the IVD-7-EB cows compared to the IVD-8-EB cows, respectively; this was associated with a 9% increase in conception rates at the second estrus (P=0.051) in the IVD-7-EB cows. Treatment did not significantly affect reproductive performance in heifers. Characteristics of estrus measured with radiotelemetry did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups, but more cows were detected in estrus 36 h after removal of IVDs in the IVD-8-EB cows compared to the IVD-7-EB cows (P<0.05). We concluded that reproductive performance in resynchronized dairy cows but not heifers was greater following resynchronization of estrous cycles after AI with an IVD for 7 compared to 8d when EB was injected at the start of treatment and 24h after device removal.     

Artificial insemination at 56 h after intravaginal progesterone device removal improved AI pregnancy rate in beef heifers synchronized with five-day CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocol

The objective was to determine whether timed artificial insemination (TAI) 56 h after removal of a Controlled Internal Drug Release (CIDR, 1.38 g of progesterone) insert would improve AI pregnancy rate in beef heifers compared to TAI 72 h after CIDR insert removal in a 5-days CO-Synch + CIDR protocol. Angus cross beef heifers (n = 1098) at nine locations [WA (5 locations; n = 634), ID (2 locations; n = 211), VA (one location; n = 193) and WY (one location; n = 60)] were included in this study. All heifers were given a body condition score (BCS; 1-emaciated; 9-obese), and received a CIDR insert and 100 μg of gonadorelin hydrochloride (GnRH) on Day 0. The CIDR insert was removed and two doses of 25 mg of dinoprost (PGF_2α) were given, first dose at CIDR insert removal and second dose 6 h later, on Day 5. A subset of heifers (n = 629) received an estrus detector aid at CIDR removal. After CIDR removal, heifers were observed thrice daily for estrus and estrus detector aid status until they were inseminated. Within farm, heifers were randomly allocated to two groups and were inseminated either at 56 h (n = 554) or at 72 h (n = 544) after CIDR removal. All heifers were given 100 μg of GnRH at AI. Insemination 56 h after CIDR insert removal improved AI pregnancy rate compared to insemination 72 h (66.2 vs. 55.9%; P < 0.001; 1 - β = 0.94). Locations, BCS categories (≤ 6 vs. > 6) and location by treatment and BCS by treatment interactions did not influence AI pregnancy rate (P > 0.1). The AI pregnancy rates for heifers with BCS ≤ 6 and > 6 were 61.8 and 60.1%, respectively (P > 0.1). The AI pregnancy rates among locations varied from 54.9 to 69.2% (P > 0.1). The AI pregnancy rate for heifers observed in estrus at or before AI was not different compared to heifers not observed in estrus [(65.4% (302/462) vs. 52.7% (88/167); P > 0.05)]. In conclusion, heifers inseminated 56 h after CIDR insert removal in a 5-days CO-Synch + CIDR protocol had, on average, 10.3% higher AI pregnancy rate compared to heifers inseminated 72 h after CIDR insert removal.     

Presynchronization with GnRH 7 days prior to resynchronization with CO-Synch did not improve pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cows

The objective was to determine the effect of presynchronization with GnRH 7 d prior to the initiation of resynchronization with CO-Synch on pregnancy/AI (P/AI) of resynchronization in lactating dairy cows, and the effect of GnRH on P/AI from previous breeding. All parity Holstein cows (n = 3287) from four dairy farms were enrolled. Cows not detected in estrus by 28 ± 3 d (Day -7) after a previous breeding were assigned to receive either GnRH (100 μg, im; n = 1636) or no GnRH (Control; n = 1651). Cows not detected in estrus during the 7 d after GnRH underwent pregnancy diagnosis (35 ± 3 d after previous breeding, Day 0); non-pregnant cows (n = 1232) in the Control (n = 645) and GnRH (n = 587) groups were resynchronized with a CO-Synch protocol. Briefly, cows received 100 μg GnRH on Day 0, 25 mg PGF_2α on Day 7, and 72 h later (Day 10) were given 100 μg GnRH and concurrently inseminated. Serum progesterone concentrations (n = 55 cows) were elevated in 47.3, 70.9, and 74.5% of cows on Days -7, 0, and 7, respectively. The proportion of cows with high progesterone concentrations on Day -7 and Day 0 were 44.1% and 88.2% (P < 0.003), and 55.2% and 33.2% (P > 0.1), for GnRH and Control groups, respectively. Accounting for significant variables such as locations (P < 0.0001) and parity categories (P < 0.05), the P/AI (35 ± 3 d after AI) for resynchronization was not different between GnRH and Control groups [26.7% (95% CI: 23.2, 30.5; (157/587) vs 28.4% (95% CI: 25.0, 31.9; (183/645); P > 0.1]. There were no significant location by treatment or parity by treatment interactions. Accounting for significant variables such as location (P < 0.0001) and parity categories (P < 0.001), the P/AI was not different between GnRH and Control groups for the previous service [60.2%; 95% CI: 57.9, 62.6; (986/1636) vs 59.1%; 95% CI: 56.7, 61.5; (976/1651); P > 0.1)]. There were no significant location by treatment or parity by treatment interactions. In conclusion, more cows presynchronized with GnRH 7 d prior to resynchronization with CO-Synch had elevated progesterone concentrations at initiation of resynchronization than those not presynchronized. The GnRH treatment 7 d prior to resynchronization with CO-Synch, when given 28 ± 3 d after a previous breeding, did not improve P/AI in lactating dairy cows; furthermore, compared to the control, it did not significantly affect pregnancy rate from the previous breeding.     

Timed artificial insemination should be performed early when used norgestomet ear implants are applied for synchronizing ovulation in beef heifers

The present study evaluated the effect of the type of norgestomet ear implant (new vs. used) on the ovarian follicular response (experiment 1) and pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) (P/AI; experiment 2) of beef heifers subjected to an estradiol plus progestin timed artificial insemination (TAI) program. In experiment 1, 57 cyclic beef heifers were randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the type (new or previously used for 9 days) of norgestomet ear (NORG) implant. At the time of NORG implant insertion, the heifers were treated with 2 mg of intramuscular estradiol benzoate. Eight days later, the NORG implants were removed, and the heifers received an intramuscular administration of 150 μg of d-cloprostenol, 300 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin, and 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate. The heifers had their ovaries scanned every 12 hours from the time of NORG implant removal to 96 hours after verifying the occurrence and timing of ovulation. No difference (P = 0.89) was observed in the ovulation rates between the two treatments (new = 80.0%; 24/30 vs. used = 81.5%; 22/27). However, the heifers treated with a used NORG implant had (P = 0.04) higher proportion (36.4%; 8/22) of early ovulation (between 36 and 48 hours after NORG implant removal) compared with the heifers treated with a new NORG implant (8.3%; 2/24). In experiment 2, at the beginning of the synchronization protocol, 416 beef heifers were randomly assigned into two groups, as described in the experiment 1. Two days after the NORG implant removal, the heifers were reassigned to be inseminated at 48 or 54 hours after NORG implant removal. There was an interaction (P = 0.03) between the type of NORG implant and the timing of TAI on P/AI. The timing of insemination only had an effect (P = 0.02) on the P/AI when the heifers were treated with a used NORG implant [(TAI 54 hours = 41.9% (44/105) vs. TAI 48 hours = 58.6% (58/99)]. In conclusion, beef heifers synchronized with a used NORG implant plus estradiol exhibited a higher proportion of earlier ovulations, and TAI in these heifers should be performed 48 hours after removal of used NORG implants.     

Incorporation of a rapid pregnancy-associated glycoprotein ELISA into a CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization program for a 28 day re-insemination interval

The objective was to compare two resynchronization programs; one that used a blood-based ELISA for pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG) for pregnancy diagnosis so that non-pregnant cows were re-inseminated at 28 d after first TAI, and another that used transrectal ultrasonography for pregnancy diagnosis so that non-pregnant cows were re-inseminated at 35 d after first TAI. The PAG_resynch cows (n = 103) began CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization on Day 18 after first TAI (Day 0). On Day 25, the CIDR was removed and pregnancy diagnosis with a PAG ELISA was performed. If a cow was not pregnant on Day 25, she was treated with PGF_2α, treated with GnRH 2 d later (Day 27), and TAI on Day 28. Control cows (n = 99) were observed for estrus until Day 25, when they began an identical CIDR-Ovsynch program with pregnancy diagnosis by transrectal ultrasonography on Day 32. If a cow was not pregnant on Day 32, then she was treated with PGF_2α, treated with GnRH 2 d later (Day 34), and TAI on Day 35. There was no difference in pregnancy per AI (P/AI) for either group at first or second insemination. For cows without pregnancy loss, the interval between first and second (P < 0.001) or second and third (P < 0.016) TAI was shorter for PAG_resynch cows compared with Control cows. The interval between first and second or second and third TAI was not different if pregnancy loss cows were included in the analysis. Plasma progesterone concentrations were similar at PGF_2α treatment, and plasma estradiol concentrations increased similarly after PGF_2α treatment for PAG_resynch and Control cows. In conclusion, the 28 d CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization protocol was comparable to a 35 d CIDR-Ovsynch resynchronization protocol that also included estrus detection. Shortened resynchronization protocols that do not require estrus detection may improve reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle.     

Induction of ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in progestin-based timed artificial insemination protocols for Bos indicus cattle

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different inducers of new follicular wave emergence (FWE) and ovulation in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) synchronization protocols using norgestomet ear implants (NORG) in Bos indicus cattle. In Experiment 1, the synchronization of FWE was evaluated when two different estradiol esters in different doses [2mg estradiol benzoate (EB), 2.5mg EV or 5mg estradiol valerate (EV)] were administered with NORG implant insertion in B. indicus cattle (estrous cyclic heifers and cows with suckling calves; n=10 per treatment). After estradiol treatment, ovarian ultrasonic exams were performed once daily to detect the interval between treatment and FWE. There were significant treatment-by-animal category interaction (P=0.05) on the interval from the estradiol treatment to FWE. An earlier (P<0.0001) and less variable (P=0.02) interval from estradiol treatment to FWE was observed in heifers treated with EB (2.5±0.2; mean±SE) than in those treated with 2.5mg EV (4.2±0.3) or 5mg EV (6.1±0.6). Cows treated with 5mg EV (4.0±0.5) had longer (P=0.05) interval than cows receiving EB (2.5±0.2), however, there was an intermediate interval in those cows treated with 2.5mg EV (3.1±0.4). In Experiment 2, the number of uses of the NORG implant (new; n=305 or previously used once; n=314) and three different ovulation induction hormones [0.5mg estradiol cypionate (EC) at implant removal (n=205), 1mg EB given 24h after implant removal (n=219), or 100μg gonadorelin (GnRH) given at FTAI (n=195)] were evaluated in Nelore heifers (2×3 factorial design). Similar pregnancy per AI (P/AI; 30 days after FTAI; P>0.05) were achieved using each of the three ovulation induction hormones (EB=40.6%; EC=48.3%, or GnRH=48.7%) and with a new (47.2%) or once-used NORG implant (44.3%). In Experiment 3, the effect of different ovulation induction hormones for FTAI [1mg EC at NORG implant removal (n=228), 10μg buserelin acetate at FTAI (GnRH; n=212) or both treatments (EC+GnRH; n=215)] on P/AI was evaluated in suckled beef cows treated with a once-used NORG implant and EB to synchronize the FWE. Similar P/AI (P=0.71) were obtained using GnRH (50.9%), EC (51.8%) or both treatments (54.9%) as ovulation induction hormones. Therefore, both doses of EV (2.5 or 5.0mg) with NORG implant delayed and increased the variation of the day of new FWE compared with EB in B. indicus cattle. These effects were more pronounced in B. indicus heifers than cows. Synchronization protocols for FTAI with either a new or once-used NORG implant with EB at insertion to induce a new FWE and either the use of EB, EC or GnRH as ovulation induction hormones may be successful in B. indicus heifers. Also, when a once-used NORG implant was used, either the administration of EC, GnRH or both as ovulation inducers resulted in similar P/AI in suckled B. indicus cows, showing no additive effect of the combination of both ovulation induction hormones.     

Resynchronization of estrous cycle with eCG and temporary calf removal in lactating Bos indicus cows

The aim of this study was to compare four methods of estrus resynchronization performed 23 days after timed artificial insemination (TAI) plus estrus observation in Bos indicus cows. Eight hundred fourteen lactating Nelore cows were submitted to TAI and then randomly assigned to one of the five following treatments: R23 (resynchronization without eCG), R23/200 (resynchronization with 200 IU of eCG), R23/300 (resynchronization with 300 IU of eCG), R23/TCR (resynchronization with temporary calf removal [TCR]), and a control group, with estrus observation followed by AI (with no resynchronization). Treatment consisted of a progesterone device plus administration of estradiol benzoate on Day 0; on Day 8, the device was removed and cloprostenol was applied, together with estradiol cypionate. Also on Day 8, either eCG was administered or TCR was performed in the resynchronized groups, except for R23. The females were inseminated 48 hours after device removal or TCR (33 days after the first TAI). The control group was kept under estrus observation from 18 to 23 days after the first TAI and was inseminated 12 hours after detection of estrus. The first pregnancy evaluation was performed using ultrasound examination 31 days after the first TAI. After 30 days of the resynchronization, a second pregnancy evaluation was performed and the animals in the R23/300 and R23/TCR groups achieved the highest conception rates, 76.6% and 74.0%, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no differences between the conception rates of the animals in the R23/200 (63.3%), R23 (61.3%), and control (54.3%) groups (P > 0.05). These results suggest that estrus resynchronization at 23 days after TAI can effectively improve the conception rate of lactating Bos indicus cows in a short time period. Furthermore, resynchronization with 300 IU of eCG or with TCR provided the best results.     

Fertility of swamp buffalo following the synchronization of ovulation by the sequential administration of GnRH and PGF2alpha combined with fixed-timed artificial insemination

This study evaluated fertility in swamp buffalo after synchronization of ovulation combined with fixed time artificial insemination. At the start of the study, designated day 0, from a group of 98 female Thai swamp buffalo, 55 buffalo (heifers n° = 20 and cows n° = 35) were selected to be synchronized with GnRH (Day 0) followed by PGF₂alpha (Day 7) and a second treatment with GnRH (Day 9). All buffalo were inseminated at two fixed times 12 h and 24 h after the second injection of GnRH (Ovsynch+TAI group); a second group of 43 buffalo (heifers n° = 19 and cows n° = 24) were not treated and were artificially inseminated (AI) at natural estrus (AI group). Blood samples were taken 22 days after insemination to evaluate progesterone plasma levels. In the Ovsynch+TAI group, overall conception rate (CR; i.e. the number of cows with progesterone >4.0 ng/ml on day 22 after AI divided by the number of animals inseminated), was 38.1% and overall pregnancy rate (PR; i.e. the number of cows that were pregnant at day 50-60 after insemination divided by the number of animals inseminated), was 32.7%. In the AI group overall CR and PR was 34.9%.Within the Ovsynch+TAI group, CR and PR were reduced (P < 0.05) in heifers compared with cows (CR 15.0% vs. 51.4% for heifers and cows, respectively; PR 15.0% vs. 42.9% for heifers and cows, respectively). Within the AI group the efficacy of treatment was similar between heifers and cows (CR and PR 31.6% for heifers and 37.5% for cows).In conclusion, this study indicates that in swamp buffalo it is possible to synchronize ovulation and use timed artificial insemination with the Ovsynch+TAI protocol.     

Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services

To compare two intervals from the PGF(2alpha) injection to the second GnRH injection+timed artificial insemination (TAI) of Ovsynch, lactating Holstein cows received their first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch (n=352) and second and greater postpartum TAI after resynchronization of ovulation using Ovsynch (Resynch; n=458). Each week, cows housed in each of four breeding pens were randomized by breeding pen to receive the second GnRH injection of Presynch + Ovsynch or Resynch and TAI either 48 h (Cosynch 48; n=382) or 72 h (Cosynch 72; n=428) after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch or Resynch. Overall, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ for cows receiving Cosynch 48 (29%) versus Cosynch 72 (33%). Furthermore, treatment did not affect P/AI for cows receiving first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch, for cows receiving second and greater TAI after Resynch, or the proportion of female calves born. In conclusion, delaying the second GnRH injection and TAI from 48 to 72 h after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch did not affect P/AI or calf sex ratio. The lack of a difference in fertility between these Cosynch protocols may offer more flexibility for implementing a systematic synchronization protocol when a Cosynch strategy is used.     

Effect of one or three timed artificial inseminations before natural service on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows not observed for detection of estrus

The objectives were to determine the effects of one or three timed artificial insemination (AI) before natural service (NS) in lactating dairy cows not observed for detection of estrus on hazard of pregnancy, days nonpregnant, and 21-days cycle pregnancy rate. A total of 1050 lactating Holstein cows were subjected to a double Ovsynch program for their first postpartum AI. On the day of first AI (78 ± 3 days in milk), cows were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to receive either one timed AI (1TAI, n = 533) or three timed AI (3TAI, n = 517) before being exposed to NS. Cows assigned to 1TAI were exposed to bulls 7 days after the first AI. Nonpregnant cows in 3TAI were resynchronized with the Ovsynch protocol supplemented with progesterone twice, with intervals between AI of 42 days, before being exposed to NS 7 days after the third AI. Cows were evaluated for pregnancy 32 days after each timed AI, or every 28 days after being exposed to NS. Pregnant cows were re-examined for pregnancy 28 days later (i.e., 60-day gestation). Exposure to heat stress was categorized based on the first AI being performed during the hot or cool season, according to the temperature-humidity index. Body condition was scored at first AI. All cows were allowed a period of 231 days of breeding, after which nonpregnant cows were censored. Pregnancy to the first AI did not differ between 1TAI and 3TAI on Day 60 after insemination (30.8 vs. 33.5%). Cows receiving 3TAI had a 15% greater hazard of pregnancy and a 17% greater 21-days cycle pregnancy rate than 1TAI and these benefits originated from the first 84 days of breeding. These changes in rate of pregnancy reduced the median and mean days nonpregnant by 9 and 10 d, respectively. Despite the long inter-AI interval in cows subjected to 3TAI, reproductive performance was improved compared with a single timed AI and subsequent exposure to NS. In dairy herds that use a combination of AI and NS, allowing cows additional opportunities to AI before onset of breeding with bulls is expected to improve reproductive performance.     

Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2α dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response,luteal regression,and fertility of lactating dairy cows

Ovsynch-type synchronization of ovulation protocols have suboptimal synchronization rates due to reduced ovulation to the first GnRH treatment and inadequate luteolysis to the prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) treatment before timed artificial insemination (TAI). Our objective was to determine whether increasing the dose of the first GnRH or the PGF_2α treatment during the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of Double-Ovsynch could improve the rates of ovulation and luteolysis and therefore increase pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI). In experiment 1, cows were randomly assigned to a two-by-two factorial design to receive either a low (L) or high (H) doses of GnRH (Gonadorelin; 100 vs. 200 μg) and a PGF_2α analogue (cloprostenol; 500 vs. 750 μg) resulting in the following treatments: LL (n = 263), HL (n = 277), LH (n = 270), and HH (n = 274). Transrectal ultrasonography and serum progesterone (P4) were used to assess ovulation to GnRH1, GnRH2, and luteal regression after PGF_2α during Breeding-Ovsynch in a subgroup of cows (n = 651 at each evaluation). Pregnancy status was assessed 29, 39, and 74 days after TAI. In experiment 2, cows were randomly assigned to LL (n = 220) or HH (n = 226) treatment as described for experiment 1. For experiment 1, ovulation to GnRH1 was greater (P = 0.01) for cows receiving H versus L GnRH (66.6% [217/326] vs. 57.5% [187/325]) treatment, but only for cows with elevated P4 at GnRH1. Cows that ovulated to GnRH1 had increased (P < 0.001) fertility compared with cows that did not ovulate (52.2% vs. 38.5%); however, no effect of higher dose of GnRH on fertility was detected. The greater PGF_2α dose increased luteal regression primarily in multiparous cows (P = 0.03) and tended to increase fertility (P = 0.05) only at the pregnancy diagnosis 39 days after TAI. Overall, P/AI was 47.0% at 29 days and 39.7% at 74 days after TAI; P/AI did not differ (P = 0.10) among treatments at 74 days (LL, 34.6%; HL, 40.8%; LH, 42.2%; HH, 40.9%) and was greater (P < 0.001) for primiparous cows than for multiparous cows (46.1% vs. 33.8%). For experiment 2, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.21) between H versus L treatments (44.2% [100/226] vs. 40.5% [89/220]). Thus, despite an increase in ovulatory response to GnRH1 and luteal regression to PGF_2α, there were only marginal effects of increasing dose of GnRH or PGF_2α on fertility to TAI after Double-Ovsynch.     

Strategies to improve pregnancy per insemination using sex-sorted semen in dairy heifers detected in estrus

The objective was to improve pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI; 35-42 d after AI) in virgin Jersey heifers bred by AI of sex-sorted semen after being detected in estrus. Giving 100 μg of GnRH at first detection of estrus, with AI 12 h later, did not affect P/AI in Experiment I [GnRH = 47.2% (100/212) vs. No GnRH = 51.7% (104/201); P = 0.38] or Experiment II [GnRH = 53.1% (137/258) vs. No GnRH = 48.6% (122/251); P = 0.43]. In these two experiments, estrus detection was done with tail-head chalk or a HeatWatch^® system, respectively. In Experiment III, a single insemination dose (2.1 × 10⁶ sperm) 12 h after estrus detection (n = 193), a double dose at 12 h (n = 193), or a double dose involving insemination 12 and 24 h after estrus detection (n = 190) did not affect P/AI (87/193 = 45.1%, 85/193 = 44.0%, and 94/190 = 49.5%, respectively; P = 0.51). However, P/AI was influenced by the number of AI service (First, 115/208 = 55.3%^a; Second, 94/204 = 46.1%^a; and Third, 57/165 = 34.8%^b; P = 0.004). In Experiment IV, the P/AI of heifers inseminated from 12 to 16 h after the onset of estrus (40/106 = 37.7%) was less (P = 0.03) than those inseminated from 16.1 to 20 h (85/164 = 51.8%), and 20.1 to 24 h (130/234 = 55.6%). However, the P/AI for heifers inseminated from 24.1 to 30 h (61/134 = 45.5%) did not differ from that of any other interval. In conclusion, in Jersey heifers inseminated with sex-sorted semen, P/AI was not significantly affected by giving GnRH at detection of estrus or a double insemination dose, but it was higher with AI 16.1 to 24 h vs. 12 to 16 h after the onset of estrus.     

The use of GnRH or estradiol to facilitate fixed-time insemination in an MGA-based synchronization regimen in beef cattle

Two experiments were conducted to compare pregnancy rates when GnRH or estradiol were given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based estrus synchronization program. Crossbred beef cattle were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg per day) for 7 days (designated days 0-6, without regard to stage of the estrous cycle) and given cloprostenol (PGF; 500 microg intramuscular (im)) on day 7. In Experiment 1, lactating beef cows (n=140) and pubertal heifers (n=40) were randomly allocated to three groups to receive 100 microg gonadorelin (GnRH), 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (E+P) in canola oil or no treatment (control) on day 0. All cattle were observed for estrus every 12 h from 36 to 96 h after PGF. Cattle in the GnRH group that were detected in estrus 36 or 48 h after PGF were inseminated 12 h later; the remainder were given 100 microg GnRH im 72 h after PGF and concurrently inseminated. Cattle in the E+P group were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5 or 1.0 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) in 2 ml canola oil im 24 h after PGF and were inseminated 30 h later. Cattle in the control group were inseminated 12 h after the first detection of estrus; if not in estrus by 72 h after PGF, they were given 100 microg GnRH im and concurrently inseminated. In the absence of significant differences, all data for heifers and for cows were combined and the 0.5 and 1.0 mg EB groups were combined into a single estradiol group. Estrus rates were 57.6, 57.4 and 60.0% for the GnRH, E+P and control groups, respectively (P=0.95). The mean (+/-S.D.) interval from PGF treatment to estrus was shorter (P<0.001) and less variable (P<0.001) in the E+P group (49.0+/-6.1 h) than in either the GnRH (64.2+/-15.9 h) or control (66.3+/-13.3 h) groups. Overall pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.005) in the GnRH (57.6%) and E+P (55.7%) groups than in the control group (30.0%) as were pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI (47.5, 55.7 and 28.3%, respectively). In Experiment 2, 122 crossbred beef heifers were given either 100 microg GnRH or 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone in oil on day 0 and subsequently received either 100 microg GnRH 36 h after PGF and inseminated 14 h later or 1 mg EB im 24 h after PGF and inseminated 28 h later in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pregnancy rates were not significantly different among groups (41.9, 32.2, 33.3 and 36.7% in GnRH/GnRH, GnRH/EB, EB/GnRH and EB/EB groups, respectively). In conclusion, GnRH or estradiol given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based synchronization regimen resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates to fixed-time insemination.     

Comparison of the effect of estradiol benzoate plus progesterone and GnRH on the follicular wave emergence and subsequent follicular development in CIDR-treated, lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts

This study examined the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB) plus progesterone (P4) as compared with GnRH on follicular wave emergence and follicular development, and synchrony of ovulation and pregnancy rates following a second injection of GnRH in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts. Lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts received a CIDR device, with an injection of 2mg EB plus 50mg P4 (EB+P4 group) or with an injection of 100 microg GnRH (GnRH group) at the beginning of the experiment (day 0). Thereafter, all received PGF(2alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 12/15 EB plus P4-treated and 14/15 GnRH-treated cows (P>0.05). The interval to wave emergence was longer in the EB+P4 group (4.8+/-0.4 days) than in the GnRH group (2.0+/-0.2 days). The mean diameters of preovulatory follicles and the proportion of cows with preovulatory follicles greater than 12 mm on day 9 did not differ between groups (P>0.05). The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations by 40 h after the GnRH injection on day 11 and pregnancy rates to TAI did not differ between the EB+P4 (13/15 and 36.7%) and the GnRH (14/15 and 53.3%) groups, respectively. Results suggest that a single treatment with EB plus P4 as compared with GnRH simultaneously with CIDR insertion in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts will result in relatively asynchronous emergence of a new follicular wave, but subsequently similar sizes of preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in similar pregnancy rates to TAI.     

The use of PGF2α as ovulatory stimulus for timed artificial insemination in cattle

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a PGF2α-analogue (PGF) on ovulation and pregnancy rates after timed artificial insemination (TAI) in cattle. In experiment 1, crossbred dual-purpose heifers, in a crossover design (3 × 3), were given an intravaginal progesterone-releasing insert (controlled internal drug release [CIDR]) plus 1 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) intramuscularly (im) and 250 μg of a PGF-analogue im on Day 0. The CIDR inserts were removed 5 days after follicular wave emergence, and the heifers were randomly divided into three treatment groups to receive the following treatments: (1) 1 mg of EB im (EB group, n = 13); (2) 500 μg of PGF im (PG group, n = 13); or (3) saline (control group, n = 13), 24 hours after CIDR removal. Ovulation occurred earlier in EB (69.81 ± 3.23 hours) and PG groups (73.09 ± 3.23 hours) compared with control (83.07 ± 4.6 hours; P = 0.01) after CIDR removal. In experiment 2, pubertal beef heifers (n = 444), 12 to 14 months of age were used. On Day 0, the heifers were given a CIDR insert plus 2 mg EB im. On Day 9, the CIDR was removed and the heifers were given 500 μg of PGF im. Heifers were randomly assigned into one of three treatment groups: (1) 1 mg of EB (EB group; n = 145); (2) 500 μg of PGF (PG group; n = 149), both 24 hours after CIDR removal; or (3) 600 μg of estradiol cypionate (ECP group; n = 150) at CIDR removal. Timed artificial insemination occurred 48 hours after CIDR removal in the ECP group and 54 hours in the PG and EB groups. The percentage of heifers ovulating was higher in the PG group compared with the other groups (P = 0.08). However, the pregnancy rates did not differ among groups (47.6%, 45%, and 46.6%, for EB, PG, and ECP, respectively; P = 0.9). In experiment 3, 224 lactating beef cows, 40 to 50 days postpartum with 2.5 to 3.5 of body condition score were treated similarly as described in experiment 2, except for the ECP group, which was excluded. The treatments were as follows: 1 mg EB (EB group; n = 117) or 500 μg PGF (PG group; n = 107), 24 hours after CIDR removal. The calves were temporarily separated from their dams from Days 9 to 11. No difference was detected on the pregnancy rate between the EB and PG groups (58.1% vs. 47.6%, respectively; P = 0.11). Taken together, the combined results suggested that PGF2α could be successfully used to induce and synchronize ovulation in cattle undergoing TAI, with similar pregnancy rates when compared with other ovulatory stimuli (ECP and EB).