Structural features required for ligand binding to the beta-adrenergic receptor.

On the basis of the homology between the amino acid sequences of the beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) and the opsin proteins we have proposed that the ligand binding domain lies within the seven transmembrane hydrophobic regions of the protein, which are connected by hydrophilic regions alternatively exposed extracellularly and intracellularly. We have systematically examined the importance of each of these regions by making a sequential series of deletions in the gene for the hamster beta AR which encompass most of the protein coding region. The ability of the corresponding mutant receptors to be expressed, localized to the cell membrane, and bind beta-adrenergic ligands has been analyzed, using transient expression in COS-7 cells. The hydrophobic regions and the hydrophilic segments immediately adjacent to the membrane cannot be removed without affecting the processing and membrane localization of the beta AR. However, most of the hydrophilic regions appear to be dispensable for ligand binding. In addition, we observed that substitution of the conserved cysteine residues at positions 106 and 184 dramatically altered the ligand binding characteristics of the beta AR, suggesting the occurrence of a disulfide bond between these two residues in the native protein. These data are discussed in terms of the tertiary structure of the beta AR.     

Fluorescent localization of the beta-adrenergic receptor on DDT-1 cells. Down-regulation by adrenergic agonists.

Continuous incubation of cultured cells with beta-adrenergic agonists results in the desensitization of adrenergic responsiveness accompanied by the down-regulation of cell surface beta-adrenergic receptors (beta AR). Previous studies have relied on measurements of ligand binding activity for the detection of the beta AR in the cell. In the present study, we have raised a monoclonal antibody to a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acid numbers 226-239 of the hamster beta 2AR. This antibody was used to localize the beta AR in hamster smooth-muscle DDT-1 cells by immunofluorescence, without regard for the ability of the receptor to bind ligands. The beta AR was found to be localized primarily at the plasma membrane of these cells, with a nonhomogeneous pattern of distribution. A rapid loss of beta AR-specific immunofluorescence, which paralleled receptor down-regulation as measured by ligand-binding activity, was seen with beta-adrenergic agonists, but not with antagonists. In addition, a transient increase in fluorescence was observed after short times of exposure of the cells to agonists. This fluorescence increase may reflect a ligand-induced conformational change in the receptor.     

Structural basis of beta-adrenergic receptor function

Receptors that mediate their actions by stimulating guanine nucleotide binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) share structural as well as functional similarities. The structural motif characteristic of receptors of this class includes seven hydrophobic putative transmembrane domains linked by hydrophilic loops. Genetic analysis of the beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) revealed that the ligand binding domain of this receptor, like that of rhodopsin, involves residues within the hydrophobic core of the protein. On the basis of these studies, a model for ligand binding to the receptor has been developed in which the amino group of an agonist or antagonist is anchored to the receptor through the carboxylate side chain of Asp113 in the third transmembrane helix. Other interactions between specific residues of the receptor and functional groups on the ligand have also been proposed. The interaction between the beta AR and the G protein Gs has been shown to involve an intracellular region that is postulated to form an amphiphilic alpha helix. This region of the beta AR is also critical for sequestration, which accompanies agonist-mediated desensitization, to occur. Structural similarities among G protein-linked receptors suggest that the information gained from the genetic analysis of the beta AR should help define functionally important regions of other receptors of this class.     

Leutropin/beta-adrenergic receptor chimeras bind choriogonadotropin and adrenergic ligands but are not expressed at the cell surface.

In some G-protein-coupled receptors (e.g. beta-adrenergic receptor (beta 2 AR)), the ligand-binding pocket is contained within the hydrophobic transmembrane domain. In others (e.g. luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR)), the relative roles of the extracellular N-terminal domain and the transmembrane region in hormone binding are unknown. To study the roles of these domains, we prepared vectors encoding the rat LHR N-terminal domain alone (L- -), the LHR N-terminal domain fused to the transmembrane and C-terminal domains of the vesicular stomatitis virus-G protein (LVV), the LHR N-terminal domain fused to the transmembrane and C-terminal domains of the hamster beta 2 AR (LAA), and the beta 2 AR N-terminal domain fused to the transmembrane and C-terminal domains of the rat LHR (ALL). Membrane preparations obtained from COS-7 cells expressing the beta 2 AR or LAA bound the beta-adrenergic antagonist 125I-cyanopindolol with equal affinity, confirming the observation that the beta 2 AR transmembrane domain forms the hormone-binding site. Membranes from COS-7 cells transfected with LHR bound 125I-human choriomic gonadotropin (hCG). However, membranes from LAA-, L(- -)-, and LVV-transfected cells had low capacity to bind 125I-hCG unless they were solubilized with Triton X-100. The affinity of the detergent-solubilized receptors for 125I-hCG was similar to that of the LHR. We were unable to detect binding of 125I-hCG to ALL in the presence or absence of detergent. These observations suggest that, whereas the transmembrane region of the beta 2 AR is sufficient to bind adrenergic ligands, the N-terminal region of the LHR is required for binding of hCG. Although the N terminus of the LHR is sufficient to bind hCG, both the N terminus and the transmembrane domains of the LHR are required for receptor expression on the cell surface.     

Cloning, expression, and characterization of the unique bovine A1 adenosine receptor. Studies on the ligand binding site by site-directed mutagenesis.

The bovine brain A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) is distinct from other A1ARs in that it displays the unique agonist potency series of N6-R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) greater than N6-S-phenylisopropyladenosine (S-PIA) greater than 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine and has a 5-10-fold higher affinity for both agonists and antagonists. The cDNA for this receptor has been cloned from a size-selected (2-4-kb) bovine brain library and sequenced. The 2.0-kb cDNA encodes a protein of 326 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of 36,570 daltons. The amino acid sequence fits well into the seven-transmembrane domain motif typical of G protein-coupled receptors. Northern analysis in bovine tissue using the full length cDNA demonstrates mRNAs of 3.4 and 5.7 kb with a tissue distribution consistent with A1AR binding. Subcloning of the cDNA in a pCMV5 expression vector with subsequent transfection into both COS7 and Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed a fully functional A1AR which could inhibit adenylylcyclase and retained the unique pharmacologic properties of the bovine brain A1AR. The A1AR was found to have a single histidine residue in each of transmembrane domains 6 and 7. Histidine residues have been postulated by biochemical studies to be important for ligand binding. Mutation of His-278 to Leu-278 (seventh transmembrane domain) dramatically decreased both agonist and antagonist binding by greater than 90%. In contrast, mutation of His-251 to Leu-251 decreased antagonist affinity and the number of receptors recognized by an antagonist radioligand. In contrast, agonist affinity was not perturbed but the number of receptors detected by an agonist radioligand was also reduced. These data suggest that both histidines are important for both agonist and antagonist binding, but His-278 appears critical for ligand binding to occur.     

Selective binding of ligands to beta 1, beta 2 or chimeric beta 1/beta 2-adrenergic receptors involves multiple subsites.

The molecular basis of ligand binding selectivity to beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes was investigated by designing chimeric beta 1/beta 2-adrenergic receptors. These molecules consisted of a set of reciprocal constructions, obtained by the exchange between the wild-type receptor genes of one to three unmodified transmembrane regions, together with their extracellular flanking regions. Eight different chimeras were expressed in Escherichia coli and studied with selective beta-adrenergic ligands. The evaluation of the relative effect of each chimeric exchange on ligand binding affinity was based on the analysis of delta G values, calculated from the equilibrium binding constants, as a function of the number of substituted beta 2-adrenergic receptor transmembrane domains. The data showed that the contribution of each exchanged region to subtype selectivity varies with each ligand; moreover, while several regions are critical for the pharmacological selectivity of all ligands, others are involved in the selectivity of only some compounds. The selectivity displayed by beta-adrenergic compounds towards beta 1 or beta 2 receptor subtypes thus results from a particular combination of interactions between each ligand and each of the subsites, variably distributed over the seven transmembrane regions of the receptor; these subsites are presumably defined by the individual structural properties of the ligands.     

Allele-specific activation of genetically engineered receptors.

The binding of agonists and antagonists to the beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) is postulated to involve an ionic interaction between the amine group of the ligand and the carboxylate side chain of Asp113 in the third hydrophobic domain of the receptor. To explore the importance of this interaction in the binding of ligands to the beta AR, a Ser residue was substituted for Asp113, and the ability of this mutant receptor to respond to compounds which could potentially interact with the hydroxyl side chain of the Ser residue was assessed. The mutant receptor was fully activated by catechol-containing esters and ketones, compounds which did not activate the wild-type beta AR. The demonstration that the molecular substitution of a single amino acid residue can alter the ligand binding specificity of the beta AR provides evidence that the chemical nature of this residue is a critical determinant in the recognition site of the receptor. Further, the ability to modify the specificity of a receptor by the replacement of amino acids at the binding site demonstrates the potential for the rational design of drugs which function specifically at genetically engineered receptors.     

Role of the first extracellular loop in the functional activation of CCR2. The first extracellular loop contains distinct domains necessary for both agonist binding and transmembrane signaling.

The physiological cellular responses to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a potent chemotactic and activating factor for mononuclear leukocytes, are mediated by specific binding to CCR2. The aim of this investigation is to identify receptor microdomains that are involved in high affinity agonist binding and receptor activation. The results from our functional studies in which we utilized neutralizing antisera against CCR2 are consistent with a multidomain binding model, previously proposed by others. The first extracellular loop was of particular interest, because in addition to a ligand-binding domain it contained also information for receptor activation, crucial for transmembrane signaling. Replacement of the first extracellular loop of CCR2 with the corresponding region of CCR1 decreased the MCP-1 binding affinity about 10-fold and prevented transmembrane signaling. A more detailed analysis by site-directed mutagenesis revealed that this receptor segment contains two distinct microdomains. The amino acid residues Asn(104) and Glu(105) are essential for high affinity agonist binding but are not involved in receptor activation. In contrast, the charged amino acid residue His(100) does not contribute to ligand binding but is vital for receptor activation and initiation of transmembrane signaling. We hypothesize that the interaction of agonist with this residue initiates the conformational switch that allows the formation of the functional CCR2-G protein complex.     

The importance of valine 114 in ligand binding in β2‐adrenergic receptor

G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane signaling molecules, with a majority of them performing important physiological roles. β₂‐Adrenergic receptor (β₂‐AR) is a well‐studied GPCRs that mediates natural responses to the hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline. Analysis of the ligand‐binding region of β₂‐AR using the recently solved high‐resolution crystal structures revealed a number of highly conserved amino acids that might be involved in ligand binding. However, detailed structure‐function studies on some of these residues have not been performed, and their role in ligand binding remains to be elucidated. In this study, we have investigated the structural and functional role of a highly conserved residue valine 114, in hamster β₂‐AR by site‐directed mutagenesis. We replaced V114 in hamster β₂‐AR with a number of amino acid residues carrying different functional groups. In addition to the complementary substitutions V114I and V114L, the V114C and V114E mutants also showed significant ligand binding and agonist dependent G‐protein activation. However, the V114G, V114T, V114S, and V114W mutants failed to bind ligand in a specific manner. Molecular modeling studies were conducted to interpret these results in structural terms. We propose that the replacement of V114 influences not only the interaction of the ethanolamine side‐chains but also the aryl‐ring of the ligands tested. Results from this study show that the size and orientation of the hydrophobic residue at position V114 in β₂‐AR affect binding of both agonists and antagonists, but it does not influence the receptor expression or folding.     

Expression of three human beta-adrenergic-receptor subtypes in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells.

The genes coding for three pharmacologically distinct subtypes of human beta-adrenergic receptors (beta 1 AR, beta 2 AR and beta 3 AR) were transfected for expression in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Stable cell lines expressing each receptor were analyzed by ligand binding, adenylate cyclase activation and photoaffinity labeling, and compared to beta AR subtypes observed in previously described tissues, primary cultures and transfected cell lines. Each of the three receptor subtypes displayed saturable [125I]iodocyanopindolol-binding activity. They showed the characteristic rank order of potencies for five agonists, determined by measuring the accumulation of intracellular cAMP. These recombinant cell lines express a homogeneous population of receptors and display the known pharmacological properties of beta 1 AR and beta 2 AR, in human tissues. It is therefore likely that the pattern of ligand binding and adenylate cyclase activation, mediated by the new beta 3 AR in CHO cells, also reflects the yet-undetermined pharmacological profile in humans.     

Chimeric melatonin mt1 and melatonin-related receptors. Identification of domains and residues participating in ligand binding and receptor activation of the melatonin mt1 receptor

Melatonin receptors bind and become activated by melatonin. The melatonin-related receptor, despite sharing considerable amino acid sequence identity with melatonin receptors, does not bind melatonin and is currently an orphan G protein-coupled receptor. To investigate the structure and function of both receptors, we engineered a series of 14 chimeric receptor constructs, allowing us to determine the relative contribution of each transmembrane domain to ligand binding and receptor function. Results identified that when sequences encoding transmembrane domains 1, 2, 3, 5, or 7 of the melatonin mt(1) receptor were replaced by the corresponding domains of the melatonin-related receptor, the resultant chimeric receptors all displayed specific 2-[(125)I]iodomelatonin binding. Replacement of sequences incorporating transmembrane domains 4 or 6, however, resulted in chimeric receptors that displayed no detectable 2-[(125)I]iodomelatonin binding. The subsequent testing of a "reverse" chimeric receptor in which sequences encoding transmembrane domains 4 and 6 of the melatonin-related receptor were replaced by the corresponding melatonin mt(1) receptor sequences identified specific 2-[(125)I]iodomelatonin binding and melatonin-mediated modulation of cyclic AMP levels. To further investigate these findings, site-directed mutagenesis was performed on residues within transmembrane domain 6 of the melatonin mt(1) receptor. This identified Gly(258) (Gly(6.55)) as a critical residue required for high affinity ligand binding and receptor function.     

Resistance of the human beta 1-adrenergic receptor to agonist-mediated down-regulation. Role of the C terminus in determining beta-subtype degradation

Prolonged agonist stimulation results in down-regulation of most G protein-coupled receptors. When we exposed baby hamster kidney cells stably expressing the human beta1-adrenergic receptor (beta 1AR) to agonist over a 24-h period, we instead observed an increase of approximately 30% in both beta 1AR binding activity and immune-detected receptors. In contrast, beta 2AR expressed in these cells exhibited a decrease of > or =50%. We determined that the basal turnover rates of the two subtypes were similar (t(1/2) approximately 7 h) and that agonist stimulation increased beta 2AR but not beta 1AR turnover. Blocking receptor trafficking to lysosomes with bafilomycin A1 had no effect on basal turnover of either subtype but blocked agonist-stimulated beta 2AR turnover. As beta 1AR mRNA levels increased in agonist-stimulated cells, beta 1AR up-regulation appeared to result from increased synthesis with no change in degradation. To explore the basis for the subtype differences, we expressed chimeras in which the C termini had been exchanged. Each chimera responded to persistent agonist stimulation based on the source of its C-tail; beta 1AR with a beta 2AR C-tail underwent down-regulation, and beta 2AR with a beta 1AR C-tail underwent up-regulation. The C-tails had a corresponding effect on agonist-stimulated receptor phosphorylation and internalization with the order being beta 2AR > beta 1AR with beta 2AR C-tail > beta 2AR with a beta 1AR C-tail > beta 1AR. As internalization may be a prerequisite for down-regulation, we addressed this possibility by co-expressing each subtype with arrestin-2. Although beta 1AR internalization was increased to that of beta 2AR, down-regulation still did not occur. Instead, beta 1AR accumulated inside the cells. We conclude that in unstimulated cells, both subtypes appear to be turned over by the same mechanism. Upon agonist stimulation, both subtypes are internalized, and beta 2AR but not beta 1AR undergoes lysosomal degradation, the fate of each subtype being regulated by determinants in its C-tail.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of a single residue changes the binding properties of the serotonin 5-HT2 receptor from a human to a rat pharmacology.

Mesulergine displays approximately 50-fold higher affinity for the rat 5-HT2 receptor than for the human receptor. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of cDNA clones encoding the human and rat 5-HT2 receptors reveals only 3 amino acid differences in their transmembrane domains. Only one of these differences (Ser----Ala at position 242 of TM5) is near to regions implicated in ligand binding by G protein-coupled receptors. We investigated the effect of mutating Ser242 of the human 5-HT2 receptor to an Ala residue as is found in the rat clone. Both [3H]mesulergine binding and mesulergine competition of [3H]ketanserin binding showed high affinity for rat membranes and the mutant human clone but low affinity for the native human clone, in agreement with previous studies of human postmortem tissue. These studies suggest that a single naturally occurring amino acid change between the human and the rat 5-HT2 receptors makes a major contribution to their pharmacological differences.     

Molecular cloning and expression of the cDNA for the alpha 1A-adrenergic receptor. The gene for which is located on human chromosome 5.

Pharmacological and molecular cloning studies have demonstrated heterogeneity of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. We have now cloned two alpha 1-adrenergic receptors from a rat cerebral cortex cDNA library, using the hamster alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor as a probe. The deduced amino acid sequence of clone RA42 encodes a protein of 560 amino acids whose putative topology is similar to that of the family of G-protein-coupled receptors. The primary structure though most closely resembles that of an alpha 1-adrenergic receptor, having approximately 73% amino acid identity in the putative transmembrane domains with the previously isolated hamster alpha 1B receptor. Analysis of the ligand binding properties of RA42 expressed in COS-7 cells with a variety of adrenergic ligands demonstrates a unique alpha 1-adrenergic receptor pharmacology. High affinity for the antagonist WB4101 and agonists phenylephrine and methoxamine suggests that cDNA RA42 encodes the alpha 1A receptor subtype. Northern blot analysis of various rat tissues also shows the distribution expected of the alpha 1A receptor subtype with abundant expression in vas deferens followed by hippocampus, cerebral cortex, aorta, brainstem, heart and spleen. The second alpha 1-adrenergic receptor cloned represents the rat homolog of the hamster alpha 1B subtype. Expression of mRNA for this receptor is strongly detected in liver followed by heart, cerebral cortex, brain stem, kidney, lung, and spleen. This study provides definitive evidence for the existence of three alpha 1-adrenergic receptor subtypes.     

Structure/function analysis of the integrin beta 1 subunit by epitope mapping

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been produced against the chicken beta 1 subunit that affect integrin functions, including ligand binding, alpha subunit association, and regulation of ligand specificity. Epitope mapping of these antibodies was used to identify regions of the subunit involved in these functions. To accomplish this, we produced mouse/chicken chimeric beta 1 subunits and expressed them in mouse 3T3 cells. These chimeric subunits were fully functional with respect to heterodimer formation, cell surface expression, and cell adhesion. They differed in their ability to react with a panel anti- chicken beta 1 mAbs. Epitopes were identified by a loss of antibody binding upon substitution of regions of the chicken beta 1 subunit by homologous regions of the mouse beta 1 subunit. The identification of the epitope was confirmed by a reciprocal exchange of chicken and mouse beta 1 domains that resulted in the gain of the ability of the mouse subunit to interact with a particular anti-chicken beta 1 mAb. Using this approach, we found that the epitopes for one set of antibodies that block ligand binding mapped toward the amino terminal region of the beta 1 subunit. This region is homologous to a portion of the ligand-binding domain of the beta 3 subunit. In addition, a second set of antibodies that either block ligand binding, alter ligand specificity, or induce alpha/beta subunit dissociation mapped to the cysteine rich repeats near the transmembrane domain of the molecule. These data are consistent with a model in which a portion of beta 1 ligand binding domain rests within the amino terminal 200 amino acids and a regulatory domain, that affects ligand binding through secondary changes in the structure of the molecule resides in a region of the subunit, possibly including the cysteine-rich repeats, nearer the transmembrane domain. The data also suggest the possibility that the alpha subunit may exert an influence on ligand specificity by interacting with this regulatory domain of the beta 1 subunit.     

Role of the His273 located in the sixth transmembrane domain of the angiotensin II receptor subtype AT2 in ligand-receptor interaction

Angiotensin II receptor subtypes AT1 and AT2 are proteins with seven transmembrane domain (TMD) topology and share 34% homology. It was shown that His256, located in the sixth TMD of the AT1 receptor, is needed for the agonist activation by the Phe8 side chain of angiotensin II, although replacing this residue with arginine or glutamine did not significantly alter the affinity binding of the receptor. We hypothesized that the His273 located in the sixth transmembrane domain of the AT2 receptor may play a similar role in the functions of the AT2 receptor, although this residue was not identified as a conserved residue in the initial homology comparisions. Therefore, we replaced His273 of the AT2 receptor with arginine or glutamine and analyzed the ligand-binding properties of the mutant receptors using Xenopus oocytes as an expression system. Our results suggested that the AT2 receptor mutants His273Arg and His273 Glu have lost their affinity to [125I-Sar1-Ile8]Ang II, a peptidic ligand that binds both the AT1 and AT2 receptors and to 125I-CGP42112A, a peptidic ligand that binds specifically to the AT2 receptor. Thus, His273 located in the sixth TMD of the AT2 receptor seems to play an important role in determining the binding properties of this receptor. Moreover, these results along with our previous observation that the Lys215 located in the 5th TMD of the AT2 receptor is essential for its high affinity binding to [125I-Sar1-Ile8]Ang II indicate that key amino acids located in the 5th and 6th TMDs of the AT2 receptor are needed for high affinity binding of the AT2 to its ligands.     

Adrenergic receptor homologies in vertebrate and invertebrate species examined by DNA hybridization

The deduced protein sequences of the mammalian adrenergic receptors (ARs) suggest that these proteins have evolved by several ancient gene duplication events. To investigate in what species these events may have occurred DNA fragments encoding the family of adrenergic receptors from human (beta 1AR and alpha 2AR) and hamster (beta 2AR and alpha 1AR) were used to detect homologous sequences in other vertebrates, invertebrates and unicellular organisms by Southern blot hybridization analysis. Sequences homologous to hamster beta 2AR were detected in lower vertebrates, invertebrates and Dictyostelium, but not in yeast or bacteria. Within vertebrates, sequences strongly homologous to human beta 1AR and human platelet alpha 2AR were confined to the higher vertebrates only. In the invertebrates, only Drosophila contained sequences homologous to hamster alpha 1AR. Our results suggest that non-mammalian species may contain receptors homologous to the mammalian adrenergic receptors and that the sequences homologous to human beta 2AR have been the most strongly conserved.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of beta-adrenergic receptors. Identification of conserved cysteine residues that independently affect ligand binding and receptor activation

Using site-directed mutagenesis of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor and continuous expression in B-82 cells, the role of 3 conserved cysteines in transmembrane domains and 2 conserved cysteines in the third extracellular domain in receptor function was examined. Cysteine was replaced with serine in each mutant receptor as this amino acid is similar to cysteine in size but it cannot form disulfide linkages. Replacement of cysteine residues 77 and 327, in the second and seventh transmembrane-spanning domains, respectively, had no effect on ligand binding or the ability of the receptor to mediate isoproterenol stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Substitution of cysteine 285, in the sixth transmembrane domain of the receptor, produced a mutant receptor with normal ligand-binding properties but a significantly attenuated ability to mediate stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Mutation of cysteine residues 190 and 191, in the third extracellular loop of the beta 2 receptor, had qualitatively similar effects on ligand binding and isoproterenol-mediated stimulation of adenylate cyclase. Replacement of either of these residues with serine produced mutant receptors that displayed a marked loss in affinity for both beta-adrenergic agonists and antagonists. Replacement of both cysteine 190 and 191 with serine had an even greater effect on the ability of the receptor to bind ligands. Consistent with the loss of Ser190 and/or Ser191 mutant receptor affinity for agonists was a corresponding shift to the right in the dose-response curve for isoproterenol-induced increases in intracellular cyclic AMP concentrations in cells expressing the mutant receptors. These data implicate one of the conserved transmembrane cysteine residues in the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor in receptor activation by agonists and also suggest that conserved cysteine residues in an extracellular domain of the receptor may be involved in ligand binding.     

Type I PDZ ligands are sufficient to promote rapid recycling of G Protein-coupled receptors independent of binding to N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor

Molecular sorting of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) between divergent recycling and lysosomal pathways determines the functional consequences of agonist-induced endocytosis. The carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) mediates both PDZ binding to Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor/ezrin/radixin/moesin-binding phosphoprotein of 50 kDa (NHERF/EBP50) family proteins and non-PDZ binding to the N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF). We have investigated whether PDZ interaction(s) are actually sufficient to promote rapid recycling of endocytosed receptors and, if so, whether PDZ-mediated sorting is restricted to the beta2AR tail or to sequences that bind NHERF/EBP50. The trafficking effects of short (10 residue) sequences differing in PDZ and NSF binding properties were examined using chimeric mutant receptors. The recycling activity of the beta2AR-derived tail sequence was not blocked by a point mutation that selectively disrupts binding to NSF, and naturally occurring PDZ ligand sequences were identified that do not bind detectably to NSF yet function as strong recycling signals. The carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain of the beta1-adrenergic receptor, which does not bind either to NSF or NHERF/EBP50 and interacts selectively with a distinct group of PDZ proteins, promoted rapid recycling of chimeric mutant receptors with efficiency similarly high as that of the beta2AR tail. These results indicate that PDZ domain-mediated protein interactions are sufficient to promote rapid recycling of GPCRs, independent of binding to NSF. They also suggest that PDZ-directed recycling is a rather general mechanism of GPCR regulation, which is not restricted to a single GPCR, and may involve additional PDZ domain-containing protein(s) besides NHERF/EBP50.