Reconstructing evolution: gene transfer from plastids to the nucleus

During evolution, the genomes of eukaryotic cells have undergone major restructuring to meet the new regulatory challenges associated with compartmentalization of the genetic material in the nucleus and the organelles acquired by endosymbiosis (mitochondria and plastids). Restructuring involved the loss of dispensable or redundant genes and the massive translocation of genes from the ancestral organelles to the nucleus. Genomics and bioinformatic data suggest that the process of DNA transfer from organelles to the nucleus still continues, providing raw material for evolutionary tinkering in the nuclear genome. Recent reconstruction of these events in the laboratory has provided a unique tool to observe genome evolution in real time and to study the molecular mechanisms by which plastid genes are converted into functional nuclear genes. Here, we summarize current knowledge about plastid-to-nuclear gene transfer in the context of genome evolution and discuss new insights gained from experiments that recapitulate endosymbiotic gene transfer in the laboratory.     

Gene function, gene networks and the fate of duplicated genes

For both copies of a duplicated gene to become fixed in a population and subsequently maintained, selection must favour individuals with both genes over individuals with one. Here I review and assess some of the proposed ways that gene structure and function might affect the likelihood of both copies acquiring distinct functions and therefore positive selection. In particular I focus on the interacting pathways of genes that make up gene networks, and how these may affect genes duplicated both singly and en masse. Using the Wnt and hedgehog pathways as examples and data from developmental and genome analyses, I show that, while some of these theories may genuinely reflect what has occurred in animal evolution, there are still insufficient data to rigorously assess their relative importance. This, however, is likely to change in the near future.     

Free-radical-induced mutation vs redox regulation: Costs and benefits of genes in organelles

The prokaryotic endosymbionts that became plastids and mitochondria contained genes destined for one of three fates. Genes required for free-living existence were lost. Most genes useful to the symbiosis were transferred to the nucleus of the host. Some genes, a small minority, were retained within the organelle. Here we suggest that a selective advantage of movement of genes to the nucleus is decreased mutation: plastids and mitochondria have high volume-specific rates of redox reactions, producing oxygen free radicals that chemically modify DNA. These mutations lead to synthesis of modified electron carriers that in turn generate more mutagenic free radicals—the “vicious circle” theory of aging. Transfer of genes to the nucleus is also advantageous in facilitating sexual recombination and DNA repair. For genes encoding certain key components of photosynthesis and respiration, direct control of gene expression by redox state of electron carriers may be required to minimize free radical production, providing a selective advantage of organelle location which outweighs that of location in the nucleus. A previous proposal for transfer of genes to the nucleus is an economy of resources in having a single genome and a single apparatus for gene expression, but this argument fails if any organellar gene is retained. A previous proposal for the retention of genes within organelles is that certain proteins are organelle-encoded because they cannot be imported, but there is now evidence against this view. Decreased free radical mutagenesis and increased sexual recombination upon transfer to the nucleus together with redox control of gene expression in organelles may now account for the slightly different gene distributions among nuclei, plastids, and mitochondria found in major eukaryote taxa. This analysis suggests a novel reason for uniparental inheritance of organelles and the evolution of anisogametic sex, and may also account for the occurrence of nitrogen fixation in symbionts rather than in nitrogen-fixing organelles. Correspondence to: J.F. Allen     

Energy transduction anchors genes in organelles

The work of mitochondria and chloroplasts is energy transduction in respiration and photosynthesis. The physico‐chemical mechanisms of bioenergetics do not directly involve genes and heredity, and furthermore, redox chemistry is intrinsically mutagenic. Thus the small, functional genomes of mitochondria and chloroplasts are an oddity. Although extensively sequenced and catalogued, cytoplasmic genomes are still not explained. Genomic lethargy is not the answer. Some genes linger from the bacterial ancestors of these organelles, true, but most have left, and new ones arrive. There is a mounting case for a massive and indiscriminate intracellular gene transfer between organelles and the cell nucleus, with the frequency of relocation being comparable to that of mutation. Nevertheless, a few organellar proteins, all working at the core of bioenergetics, always seem to keep the genes encoding them close at hand. Stability amid flux suggests the invisible hand of selection. Selection for what? There are clues, and the beginnings of experimental support, for the theory that expression of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes is regulated by the function of their gene products. For safe and efficient energy transduction, genes in organelles are in the right place at the right time. BioEssays 27:426–435, 2005. © 2005 Wiley periodicals, Inc.     

Conditions for the Evolution of Gene Clusters in Bacterial Genomes

Genes encoding proteins in a common pathway are often found near each other along bacterial chromosomes. Several explanations have been proposed to account for the evolution of these structures. For instance, natural selection may directly favour gene clusters through a variety of mechanisms, such as increased efficiency of coregulation. An alternative and controversial hypothesis is the selfish operon model, which asserts that clustered arrangements of genes are more easily transferred to other species, thus improving the prospects for survival of the cluster. According to another hypothesis (the persistence model), genes that are in close proximity are less likely to be disrupted by deletions. Here we develop computational models to study the conditions under which gene clusters can evolve and persist. First, we examine the selfish operon model by re-implementing the simulation and running it under a wide range of conditions. Second, we introduce and study a Moran process in which there is natural selection for gene clustering and rearrangement occurs by genome inversion events. Finally, we develop and study a model that includes selection and inversion, which tracks the occurrence and fixation of rearrangements. Surprisingly, gene clusters fail to evolve under a wide range of conditions. Factors that promote the evolution of gene clusters include a low number of genes in the pathway, a high population size, and in the case of the selfish operon model, a high horizontal transfer rate. The computational analysis here has shown that the evolution of gene clusters can occur under both direct and indirect selection as long as certain conditions hold. Under these conditions the selfish operon model is still viable as an explanation for the evolution of gene clusters.     

The social evolution of bacterial pathogenesis

Many of the genes responsible for the virulence of bacterial pathogens are carried by mobile genetic elements that can be transferred horizontally between different bacterial lineages. Horizontal transfer of virulence-factor genes has played a profound role in the evolution of bacterial pathogens, but it is poorly understood why these genes are so often mobile. Here, I present a hypothetical selective mechanism maintaining virulence-factor genes on horizontally transmissible genetic elements. For virulence factors that are secreted extracellularly, selection within hosts may favour mutant 'cheater' strains of the pathogen that do not produce the virulence factor themselves but still benefit from factors produced by other members of the pathogen population within a host. Using simple mathematical models, I show that if this occurs then selection for infectious transmission between hosts favours pathogen strains that can reintroduce functional copies of virulence-factor genes into cheaters via horizontal transfer, forcing them to produce the virulence factor. Horizontal gene transfer is thus a novel mechanism for the evolution of cooperation. I discuss predictions of this hypothesis that can be tested empirically and its implications for the evolution of pathogen virulence.     

Evolution of beta-lactam biosynthesis genes and recruitment of trans-acting factors

Penicillins and cephalosporins belong chemically to the group of beta-lactam antibiotics. The formation of hydrophobic penicillins has been reported in fungi only, notably Penicillium chrysogenum and Emericella nidulans, whereas the hydrophilic cephalosporins are produced by both fungi, e.g., Acremonium chrysogenum (cephalosporin C), and bacteria. The producing bacteria include Gram-negatives and Gram-positives, e.g. Lysobacter lactamdurans (cephabacins) and Streptomyces clavuligerus (cephamycin C), respectively. For a long time the evolutionary origin of beta-lactam biosynthesis genes in fungi has been discussed. As often, there are arguments for both hypotheses, i.e., horizontal gene transfer from bacteria to fungi versus vertical descent. There were strong arguments in favour of horizontal gene transfer, e.g., fungal genes were clustered or some genes lack introns. The recent identification and characterisation of cis-/trans-elements involved in the regulation of the beta-lactam biosynthesis genes has provided new arguments in favour of horizontal gene transfer. In contrast to the bacterium S. clavuligerus, all regulators of fungal beta-lactam biosynthesis genes represent wide-domain regulators which were recruited to also regulate the beta-lactam biosynthesis genes. Moreover, the fungal regulatory genes are not part of the gene cluster. If bacterial regulators were co-transferred with the gene cluster from bacteria to fungi, most likely they would have been non-functional in eukaryotes and lost during evolution. Alternatively, it is conceivable that only a part of the beta-lactam biosynthesis gene cluster was transferred to some fungi, e.g., the acvA and ipnA gene without a regulatory gene.     

Evolution of variation in presence and absence of genes in bacterial pathways

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Bacterial genomes exhibit a remarkable degree of variation in the presence and absence of genes, which probably extends to the level of individual pathways. This variation may be a consequence of the significant evolutionary role played by horizontal gene transfer, but might also be explained by the loss of genes through mutation. A challenge is to understand why there would be variation in gene presence within pathways if they confer a benefit only when complete. RESULTS: Here, we develop a mathematical model to study how variation in pathway content is produced by horizontal transfer, gene loss and partial exposure of a population to a novel environment. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss the possibility that variation in gene presence acts as cryptic genetic variation on which selection acts when the appropriate environment occurs. We find that a high level of variation in gene presence can be readily explained by decay of the pathway through mutation when there is no longer exposure to the selective environment, or when selection becomes too weak to maintain the genes. In the context of pathway variation the role of horizontal gene transfer is probably the initial introduction of a complete novel pathway rather than in building up the variation in a genome without the pathway.     

System to study horizontal gene exchange among microorganisms without cultivation of recipients

Ribosomal RNA genes are characterized by highly conserved sequences and are present in multiple copies in most prokaryotic chromosomes. In principle, therefore, they might serve as sites for homologous recombination between unrelated microorganisms. Plasmids containing 23S ribosomal gene sequences, from different bacteria, which had been interrupted by insertion of a kanamycin-resistance gene, were used to transform Acinetobacter sp. DSM587 (former name: Acinetobacter calcoaceticus BD413-ivl10). In all cases, homologies between the 23S rRNA genes of phylogenetically distant bacteria and Acinetobac-ter sp. DSM587 were sufficient for replacement recombination events. The integration events, resulting in inactivation of any one of the seven rrn operons of Acinetobacter sp. DSM587, had no observable influence on cell growth. These results suggest the possibility of rRNA genes serving as natural vehicles for horizontal gene transfer. They also provide the basis of a novel strategy to analyse gene transfer without selection or cultivation of recipient cells. Because of the highly conserved structure of bacterial rrn operons, recombination events subsequent to gene transfer can be readily identified by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the recombinant sequence using a universal forward primer for the 16S rRNA gene and a reverse primer specific for the integrated marker gene.     

Conservation of gene order amongst cell wall and cell division genes in Eubacteria, and ribosomal genes in Eubacteria and Eukaryotic organelles

Comparison of genome sequences from Eubacteria and Eukaryotic organelles shows that the order of genes in gene clusters encoding certain highly conserved cell division proteins and ribosomal proteins is itself highly conserved. Experiments with a cluster of cell division and related genes of E. colihave shown that this gene order is not essential for function. Comparisons between genomes also show that no pair of genes are necessarily adjacent in all genomes. The reason for the extreme conservation of order is therefore unknown, although one possible explanation might be the lateral exchange of tightly-linked groups of genes coding for co-adapted sets of proteins.     

基因水平转移的评判方法和转移方式研究进展

基因水平转移是不同物种之间或细胞器间基因的交流。基因水平转移现象在原核生物中普遍存在, 在真核生物中近年来也发现了众多例证, 说明水平转移是生物界的普遍现象。文章着重对基因水平转移的概念、评判基因水平转移的标准, 水平转移的特点和转移方式, 以及基因水平转移对基因组进化的作用等方面的研究进展进行了综述。在已有的基因水平转移研究中进化树分析法、碱基组成分析法、选择压力分析法、内含子分析法、特殊序列分析法和核苷酸组成偏向性分析法等几种是常用的方法; 转座序列是生物中最易于发生水平转移的基因类型;原核生物基因水平转移的主要方式有转化、接合和转导, 真核生物中水平转移发生方式尚不清楚。基因水平转移在基因、基因组和生物进化中有着其独特的作用。     

Protection of CHO cells by transfer of survivin driven by ovarian-specific promoter OSP-2

Chemotherapy is the major therapy for cancer in clinic. However, chemotherapeutic agents can harm the other tissues/organs besides cancer. Thus, there are great interests in protecting the innocents by the transfer of protective genes. There are two problems to be solved, one is the selection of protective genes and the other is the orientation of the exotic genes. Recent researches demonstrated that the principal mechanism of chemotherapeutics was through apoptosis. Hereby, introduction of anti-apoptosis genes might interrupt the processes of apoptosis to avoid side effect from chemotherapeutics. On the other hand, tissue-specific promoters, which control gene expression in a tissue-specific manner, might be an alternative tool to guarantee the location of target genes. In this research, we applied gene therapy to chemoprotection using anti-apoptosis gene survivin and ovarian-specific promoter OSP-2. The results showed that OSP-2 could specifically drive the expression of survivin in ovarian cells and survivin could protect cells via inhibiting apoptosis. This might put a light on the future of chemoprotective gene therapy.     

Are humans increasing bacterial evolvability?

Attempts to control bacterial pathogens have led to an increase in antibiotic-resistant cells and the genetic elements that confer resistance phenotypes. These cells and genes are disseminated simultaneously with the original selective agents via human waste streams. This might lead to a second, unintended consequence of antimicrobial therapy; an increase in the evolvability of all bacterial cells. The genetic variation upon which natural selection acts is a consequence of mutation, recombination and lateral gene transfer (LGT). These processes are under selection, balancing genomic integrity against the advantages accrued by genetic innovation. Saturation of the environment with selective agents might cause directional selection for higher rates of mutation, recombination and LGT, producing unpredictable consequences for humans and the biosphere.     

Genomic Conflict Settled in Favour of the Species Rather Than the Gene at Extreme GC Percentage Values

Wada and colleagues have shown that, whether prokaryotic or eukaryotic, each gene has a "homostabilising propensity" to adopt a relatively uniform GC percentage (GC%). Accordingly, each gene can be viewed as a "microisochore" occupying a discrete GC% niche of relatively uniform base composition amongst its fellow genes. Although first, second and third codon positions usually differ in GC%, each position tends to maintain a uniform, gene-specific GC% value. Thus, within a genome, genic GC% values can cover a wide range. This is most evident at third codon positions, which are least constrained by amino acid encoding needs. In 1991, Wada and colleagues further noted that, within a phylogenetic group, genomic GC% values can also cover a wide range. This is again most evident at third codon positions. Thus, the dispersion of GC% values among genes within a genome matches the dispersion of GC% values among genomes within a phylogenetic group. Wada described the context-independence of plots of different codon position GC% values against total GC% as a "universal" characteristic. Several studies relate this to recombination. We have confirmed that third codon positions usually relate more to the genes that contain them than to the species. However, in genomes with extreme GC% values (low or high), third codon positions tend to maintain a constant GC%, thus relating more to the species than to the genes that contain them. Genes in an extreme-GC% genome collectively span a smaller GC% range, and mainly rely on first and second codon positions for differentiation as "microisochores". Our results are consistent with the view that differences in GC% serve to recombinationally isolate both genome sectors (facilitating gene duplication) and genomes (facilitating genome duplication, e.g. speciation). In intermediate-GC% genomes, conflict between the needs of the species and the needs of individual genes within that species is minimal. However, in extreme-GC% genomes there is a conflict, which is settled in favour of the species (i.e. group selection) rather than in favour of the gene (genic selection).     

Forces maintaining organellar genomes: is any as strong as genetic code disparity or hydrophobicity?

It remains controversial why mitochondria and chloroplasts retain the genes encoding a small subset of their constituent proteins, despite the transfer of so many other genes to the nucleus. Two candidate obstacles to gene transfer, suggested long ago, are that the genetic code of some mitochondrial genomes differs from the standard nuclear code, such that a transferred gene would encode an incorrect amino acid sequence, and that the proteins most frequently encoded in mitochondria are generally very hydrophobic, which may impede their import after synthesis in the cytosol. More recently it has been suggested that both these interpretations suffer from serious "false positives" and "false negatives": genes that they predict should be readily transferred but which have never (or seldom) been, and genes whose transfer has occurred often or early, even though this is predicted to be very difficult. Here I consider the full known range of ostensibly problematic such genes, with particular reference to the sequences of events that could have led to their present location. I show that this detailed analysis of these cases reveals that they are in fact wholly consistent with the hypothesis that code disparity and hydrophobicity are much more powerful barriers to functional gene transfer than any other. The popularity of the contrary view has led to the search for other barriers that might retain genes in organelles even more powerfully than code disparity or hydrophobicity; one proposal, concerning the role of proteins in redox processes, has received widespread support. I conclude that this abandonment of the original explanations for the retention of organellar genomes has been premature. Several other, relatively minor, obstacles to gene transfer certainly exist, contributing to the retention of relatively many organellar genes in most lineages compared to animal mtDNA, but there is no evidence for obstacles as severe as code disparity or hydrophobicity. One corollary of this conclusion is that there is currently no reason to suppose that engineering nuclear versions of the remaining mammalian mitochondrial genes, a feat that may have widespread biomedical relevance, should require anything other than sequence alterations obviating code disparity and causing modest reductions in hydrophobicity without loss of enzymatic function.     

Evolution of mosaic operons by horizontal gene transfer and gene displacement <Emphasis Type="Italic">in situ</Emphasis>

Background

Shuffling and disruption of operons and horizontal gene transfer are major contributions to the new, dynamic view of prokaryotic evolution. Under the 'selfish operon' hypothesis, operons are viewed as mobile genetic entities that are constantly disseminated via horizontal gene transfer, although their retention could be favored by the advantage of coregulation of functionally linked genes. Here we apply comparative genomics and phylogenetic analysis to examine horizontal transfer of entire operons versus displacement of individual genes within operons by horizontally acquired orthologs and independent assembly of the same or similar operons from genes with different phylogenetic affinities.

Results

Since a substantial number of operons have been identified experimentally in only a few model bacteria, evolutionarily conserved gene strings were analyzed as surrogates of operons. The phylogenetic affinities within these predicted operons were assessed first by sequence similarity analysis and then by phylogenetic analysis, including statistical tests of tree topology. Numerous cases of apparent horizontal transfer of entire operons were detected. However, it was shown that apparent horizontal transfer of individual genes or arrays of genes within operons is not uncommon either and results in xenologous gene displacement in situ, that is, displacement of an ancestral gene by a horizontally transferred ortholog from a taxonomically distant organism without change of the local gene organization. On rarer occasions, operons might have evolved via independent assembly, in part from horizontally acquired genes.

Conclusions

The discovery of in situ gene displacement shows that combination of rampant horizontal gene transfer with selection for preservation of operon structure provides for events in prokaryotic evolution that, a priori, seem improbable. These findings also emphasize that not all aspects of operon evolution are selfish, with operon integrity maintained by purifying selection at the organism level.