Supported Telemonitoring and Glycemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes: The Telescot Diabetes Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundSelf-monitoring of blood glucose among people with type 2 diabetes not treated with insulin does not appear to be effective in improving glycemic control. We investigated whether health professional review of telemetrically transmitted self-monitored glucose results in improved glycemic control in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.ConclusionsSupported telemonitoring resulted in clinically important improvements in control of glycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in family practice. Current Controlled Trials, registration number ISRCTN71674628.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 71674628     

Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Several studies have reported that clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in a variety of clinical areas are of modest or variable quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of an international cohort of CPGs that provide recommendations on pharmaceutical management of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2).

Methods and Findings

We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) on February 15th and June 4th, 2012 for CPGs meeting inclusion criteria. Two independent assessors rated the quality of each CPG using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Twenty-four guidelines were evaluated, and most had high scores for clarity and presentation. However, scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, and applicability domains varied considerably. The majority of guidelines scored low on editorial independence, and only seven CPGs were based on an underlying systematic review of the evidence.

Conclusions

The overall quality of CPGs for glycemic control in DM2 is moderate, but there is substantial variability among quality domains within and across guidelines. Guideline users need to be aware of this variability and carefully appraise and select the guidelines that they apply to patient care.     

Nicotinamide Effects Oxidative Burst Activity of Neutrophils in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Neutrophil functions are impaired in patients with diabetes mellitus. Bacterial phagocytosis and oxidative burst activity are reduced at high glucose concentrations in diabetic patients. Defects in neutrophil oxidative burst capacity are of multifactorial origin in diabetes mellitus and correlate with glucose levels. It has been reported that neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity is impaired and superoxide production is reduced in diabetic patients with or without any infections. Nicotinamide is a vitamin B3 derivative and a NAD precursor with immunomodulatory effects. In vitro studies demonstrated that nicotinamide increases NAD and NADH content of beta cells. The authors hypothesized that nicotinamide may restore the impaired oxidative burst capacity of neutrophils in diabetic patients by increasing the NADH content as an electron donor and possibly through NADPH oxidase activity of the cell. In order to test the hypothesis, this placebo-controlled and open study was designed to evaluate neutrophil functions in infection-free poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients as compared to healthy subjects and assess the effects of nicotinamide on neutrophil phagocytosis as well as oxidative burst activity. Thirty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in the study. Sixteen were females and 14 were males, with a mean age 58 ± 10. All patients were on sulphonylurea treatment and their hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) levels were above 7.5%. The control group consisted of 10 voluntary healthy subjects. Diabetic and control subjects were not significantly different in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), leucocyte and neutrophil counts, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), but HbA_1c and fasting glucose levels were significantly higher in patients with diabetes mellitus. Phagocytic activity and respiratory burst indexes were measured by flow cytometric analyses as previously described by Rothe and Valet (Methods Enzyml., 233, 539–548, 1994) and compared in diabetic subjects and healthy controls. Diabetic patients were grouped to receive either 50 mg/kg oral nicotinamide (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15) for a period of 1 month. The 2 groups did not differ in terms of treatment, frequency of hypertension, BMI, diabetes duration, age, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA_1c, CRP, ESR, polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PNL) and neutrophil counts. Neutrophil functions were reassessed after the treatment period. Phagocytic activity represented as indexes were lower in diabetic patients when compared to healthy subjects, but the differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). Patients with diabetes mellitus had significantly lower oxidative burst indexes when compared to healthy controls (P values < .05). In diabetic patients, a negative correlation between neutrophil functions and HbA_1c was found which was not statistically significant (P values > .05). Phagocytic indexes were similar in nicotinamide and placebo groups after treatment period (P > .05). But oxidative burst activity in patients receiving nicotinamide was greater when compared with placebo and the difference was statistically significant at 30 and 45 minutes (P values .04 and .03). This effect of nicotinamide may be due to increased NADH content and NADPH oxidase activity of the cell, which needs to be further studied. Impaired neutrophil functions may aggravate various infections in patients with diabetes mellitus and blood glucose regulation is an important target of treatment to improve neutrophil functions. But nicotinamide treatment may help to improve prognosis in diabetic patients with severe infections.     

Ultra Rapid-Acting Inhaled Insulin Improves Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo determine whether the use of an inhaled insulin would improve HbA1c.MethodsThis study was performed in 20 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants with HbA1c values ≥7.5 (58) to ≤11.5% (102 mmol/mol) on a variety of glucose-lowering regimens. Prandial Technosphere insulin (TI) was rapidly titrated based on a treatment algorithm using postprandial blood glucose to calculate premeal doses. A 2-week baseline period was followed by 12 weeks of active treatment with TI. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included glucose time in range (time in range: 70-180 mg/dL) obtained by a blinded continuous glucose monitoring during the baseline period and at the end of 12 weeks. Goals were to assess how to rapidly and safely initiate TI intensification, determine dosing requirements, and establish an effective dose range in uncontrolled T2DM.ResultsMean HbA1c decreased by −1.6% (−17 mmol/mol) from 9.0% (75 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks (P < .0001). Mean time in range increased from 42.2% to 65.7% (P < .0002). Mean prandial doses of TI were 18 or 19 units for all meals. Time below range was 1.1% baseline and 2.6% post treatment (P = .01).ConclusionTreatment with inhaled TI dosed using a simple algorithm improved glycemic control measured by both HbA1c and time in range, with low rates of hypoglycemia. These data add significantly to understanding TI in the management of T2DM patients for whom prandial insulin is a consideration.     

Factors Associated with Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Rural Areas of the United States

Background: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, an estimated 18.2 million Americans, or 6.3% of the population, has diabetes mellitus (DM). Approximately 90% of these individuals have type 2 DM. The most widely used clinical test for defining glycemic control is measurement of blood glycosylated hemoglobin (AIC).Objective: The goal of this study was to estimate the proportion of diabetic patients who achieved the AIC goal of _<7.0% in a rural western Pennsylvania practice and to determine the factors that influence the achievement of the AIC goal.Methods: This was an observational study conducted in a rural family medicine office in Clarksburg, Pennsylvania. To be included in the study, patients had to have been diagnosed with type 2 DM >2 years prior, had to be aged >18 years, and had to be adhering to a medical nutrition therapy diet. Both univariate analysis and logistic regressions were used to identify the factors that were associated with the outcome.Results: A total of 136 diabetic patients were included in the study (70 men, 66 women; mean [SD] age, 59.7 [15.2] years). AIC of <7.0% was attained in 75.0% (n = 102) of the patients. Although the majority of patients were obese (69.1% [n = 94] with a body mass index >30 kg/m2), weight was not a factor in reaching AIC goal. The data showed that those patients who were older (62.3 vs 51.9 years; P = 0.004), using oral antidiabetic medication (96.1% vs 87.9%; P = 0.100), and not using insulin (86.3% vs 69.7%; P = 0.030) were more likely to achieve AIC goal. The proportion of patients achieving AIC goal levels decreased as the number of oral medications used increased.Conclusions: In this rural area of western Pennsylvania, the majority of our type 2 DM patients achieved glycemic control (ie, AIC <7.0%). The primary care physician, along with a DM care team, should address the issues of diet, exercise, weight management, and other comorbid illnesses to properly manage patients with type 2 DM. (Insulin. 2007;2:134-141)     

Pramlintide as an Adjunct to Basal Insulin: Effects on Glycemic Control and Weight in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Pramlintide is a synthetic analogue of the β-cell hormone amylin. When used as an adjunct to mealtime insulin, it reduces postprandial glucose concentrations, glycosylated hemoglobin (AIC) values, and weight. Due to its effects on postprandial glucose, pramlintide may also provide similar benefits when used as an adjunct to basal insulin in the absence of mealtime insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).Objective: The current post hoc analyses examined the efficacy and tolerability of pramlintide as an adjunct to basal insulin in a subset of patients with type 2 DM in 2 clinical trials.Methods: Post hoc analyses of 2 subgroups of patients with type 2 DM treated with pramlintide and basal insulin (with or without oral agents) with no mealtime insulin are reported. One subgroup of patents was from a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study; a second subgroup of patients was from an uncontrolled, open-label study. Mean (SE) changes from baseline in A1C, postprandial glucose, weight, and insulin dose are reported. Tolerability was also assessed.Results: Baseline characteristics (mean [SD]) of the placebo-controlled study were as follows: pramlintide—n = 18; age, 59 (11) years; A1C, 9.4% (1.3%); weight, 88.4 (16.5) kg; body mass index (BMI), 31.8 (6.1) kg/m²; placebo—n = 11; age, 56 (9) years; A1C, 9.4% (1.6%); weight, 92.0 (13.4) kg; and BMI, 31.2 (5.1) kg/m². Baseline characteristics (mean [SD]) of the patients from the open-label study were as follows: N = 10; age, 60 (12) years; A1C, 8.1% (1.3%); weight, 109.2 (26.6) kg; and BMI, 35.7 (8.1) kg/m². In the placebo-controlled study, pramlintide treatment (120 μg BID) as an adjunct to basal insulin (neutral protamine Hagedorn, lente, or ultralente) resulted in mean (SE) reductions in A1C (pramlintide, -1.16% [0.22%]; placebo, -0.48% [0.18%]; P < 0.05) and weight (pramlintide, -2.3 [1.0] kg; placebo, -0.9 [1.0] kg) compared with placebo. Similarly, in the open-label study, pramlintide treatment (120 μg before major meals) as an adjunct to insulin glargine resulted in mean (SE) reductions from baseline in AIC (-0.81% [0.26%]; 95% CI, -1.40 to -0.22) and weight (-2.8 [1.0] kg; 95% CI, -5.12 to -0.47). In addition, mean postprandial glucose excursions, ascertained by self-monitoring of blood glucose readings, were reduced after each meal. In both subgroups, pramlintide was generally well tolerated, and there were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia.Conclusion: The improvements in glycemic control and weight in these post hoc analyses warrant further clinical investigation into the use of pramlintide as a potential next therapeutic step in patients with type 2 DM treated with basal insulin.     

Efficacy and Safety of Lobeglitazone Monotherapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus over 24-Weeks: A Multicenter,Randomized, Double-Blind,Parallel-Group,Placebo Controlled Trial

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the glucose-lowering and lipid-modifying effects, and safety profile of lobeglitazone, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- γ agonist, compared to placebo as a monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Research Design and Methods

In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo controlled study, 173 patients were randomly assigned (a 2∶1 ratio) to lobeglitazone 0.5 mg (n = 115) or matching placebo (n = 58) orally once daily. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of treatment. The secondary endpoints included various glycemic parameters, lipid parameters and safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov number {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01001611","term_id":"NCT01001611"}}NCT01001611).

Results

At 24 weeks, a significant reduction in HbA1c was observed with lobeglitazone versus placebo (−0.44% vs 0.16%, mean difference −0.6%, p<0.0001). The goal of HbA1c <7% was achieved significantly more in the lobeglitazone group compared to the placebo group (44% vs 12%, p<0.0001). Markers of insulin resistance were also improved in the lobeglitazone group. In addition, lobeglitazone treatment significantly improved triglycerides, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, small dense low density lipoprotein cholesterol, free fatty acid, and apolipoprotein-B/CIII compared to placebo (p<0.01, respectively). More weight gain was observed in the lobeglitazone group than the placebo group (0.89 kg vs – 0.63 kg, mean difference 1.52 kg, p<0.0001). The safety profile was comparable between the two groups and lobeglitazone was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Lobeglitazone 0.5 mg showed a favorable balance in the efficacy and safety profile. The results support a potential role of lobeglitazone in treating type 2 diabetes.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01001611","term_id":"NCT01001611"}}NCT01001611     

GTP Cyclohydrolase I Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Endothelial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

The genetic background of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is complex and poorly understood. Studying genetic components of intermediate phenotypes, such as endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress, may aid in identifying novel genetic components for atherosclerosis in diabetic patients.

Methods

Five polymorphisms forming two haplotype blocks within the GTP cyclohydrolase 1 gene, encoding a rate limiting enzyme in tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis, were studied in the context of flow and nitroglycerin mediated dilation (FMD and NMD), intima-media thickness (IMT), and plasma concentrations of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and malondialdehyde (MDA).

Results

Rs841 was associated with FMD (p = 0.01), while polymorphisms Rs10483639, Rs841, Rs3783641 (which form a single haplotype) were associated with both MDA (p = 0.012, p = 0.0015 and p = 0.003, respectively) and vWF concentrations (p = 0.016, p = 0.03 and p = 0.045, respectively). In addition, polymorphism Rs8007267 was also associated with MDA (p = 0.006). Haplotype analysis confirmed the association of both haplotypes with studied variables.

Conclusions

Genetic variation of the GCH1 gene is associated with endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress in T2DM patients.     

二甲双胍联合西格列汀对2型糖尿病患者氧化应激、胰岛素抵抗的影响

目的:探讨二甲双胍联合西格列汀对2型糖尿病患者氧化应激、胰岛素抵抗的影响。方法:收集我院就诊或住院治疗的80例2型糖尿病患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组40例。两组患者入院后均给予相应的治疗措施,对照组患者给予二甲双胍250 mg/次,2次/d;实验组患者在对照组的基础上给予西格列汀100 mg/次,1次/d,治疗均连续8周。治疗结束后对患者血清丙二醛(MDA)、8异前列腺素F2α(8-iso-PGF2α)、空腹血糖(FBG)、空腹胰岛素(FINS)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)以及患者临床治疗效果进行检测并比较。结果:与治疗前相比,治疗后两组患者MDA、8-iso-PGF2α、FBG、FINS以及HOMA-IR水平均下降(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者MDA、8-iso-PGF2α、FBG、FINS以及HOMA-IR水平较低(P0.05),临床治疗总有效率较高(P0.05)。结论:二甲双胍联合西格列汀能够降低2型糖尿病患者血糖水平,降低MDA、8-iso-PGF2α水平,减轻氧化应激反应,降低胰岛素抵抗,临床疗效较好。     

Conflicts of Interest among Authors of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Conflict of interest (COI) is an important potential source of bias in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Objectives

To examine rates of disclosure of COI, including financial interests in companies that manufacture drugs that are recommended in CPGs on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to explore the relationship between recommendations for specific drugs in a guideline and author COI.

Methods

We identified a cohort of relevant guidelines from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and abstracted COI disclosures from all guideline authors for this observational, cross-sectional study. We determined which hypoglycemic drugs were recommended in each guideline, and explored the relationship between specific disclosures and whether a drug was recommended.

Results

Among 13 included guidelines, the percentage of authors with one or more financial disclosures varied from 0 to 94% (mean 44.2%), and was particularly high for two US-based guidelines (91% and 94%). Three guidelines disclosed no author financial COI. The percentage of authors with disclosures of financial interests in manufacturers of recommended drugs was also high (mean 30%). On average, 56% of manufacturers of patented drugs recommended in each guideline had one or more authors with a financial interest in their company. We did not find a significant relationship between financial interests and whether a drug was recommended in our sample; US-based guidelines were more likely to make recommendations for a specific drug compared to non-US based guidelines.

Discussion

Authors of this cohort of guidelines have financial interests directly related to the drugs that they are recommending. Although we did not find an association between author COI and drugs recommended in these guidelines and we cannot draw conclusions about the validity of the recommendations, the credibility of many of these guidelines is in doubt.     

Effects of Colesevelam,Rosiglitazone, or Sitagliptin on Glycemic Control and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Metformin Monotherapy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glycemic effect of colesevelam, rosiglitazone, or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and to examine the effects of these antidiabetes agents on lipid and lipoprotein levels.MethodsThis 16-week, open-label pilot study conducted between May 2007 and April 2008 at 20 sites in the United States, 7 sites in Mexico, and 6 sites in Colombia, enrolled adults with inadequately controlled type 2 DM (glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 7.0%-10.0%) on a stable metformin regimen (1500-2550 mg daily for ≥ 3 months). At Week 0, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to open-label colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g daily; openlabel rosiglitazone maleate, 4 mg daily; or open-label sitagliptin phosphate, 100 mg daily, in addition to existing metformin therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA_1c from baseline to Week 16 with last (postbaseline) observation carried forward.ResultsIn total, 169 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups (colesevelam, n = 57; rosiglitazone, n = 56; and sitagliptin, n = 56), and 141 participants (83.4%) completed the study. Least-squares mean reductions in HbA_1c from baseline were observed in all groups at Week 16 last observation carried forward (colesevelam, -0.3% [P <.031]; rosiglitazone: -0.6% [P <.001]; sitagliptin: -0.4% [P <.009]) At study end, 10 of 56 participants (17.9%) in the colesevelam group, 19 of 54 (35.2%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 15 of 55 (27.3%) in the sitagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0%. Colesevelam significantly reduced mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels relative to baseline (11.6%), whereas levels were significantly increased with rosiglitazone and sitagliptin at Week 16 last observation carried forward (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively). Twenty-two of 52 participants (42.3%) in the colesevelam group, 12 of 51 (23.5%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 13 of 53 (24.5%) in the sitagliptin group achieved LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dL at Week 16 last observation carried forward.ConclusionAll 3 antidiabetes agents significantly improved glycemic control, but only colesevelam also significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 DM. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:53-63)     

Dose- and Time-Dependent Association of Smoking and Its Cessation with Glycemic Control and Insulin Resistance in Male Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Fukuoka Diabetes Registry

Objective

Cigarette smoking is an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. However, the effect of smoking and its cessation on glycemic control in diabetic patients has not been fully examined yet. The aim of the present study was to examine the association of smoking status with glycemic level and markers of insulin resistance and secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Research Design and Methods

A total of 2,490 Japanese male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥20 years were divided according to smoking status, amount of cigarettes smoked and years since quitting. The associations with glycemic level and markers of insulin resistance and secretion were examined cross-sectionally.

Results

HbA_1c levels increased progressively with increases in both number of cigarettes per day and pack-years of cigarette smoking compared with never smokers (P for trend = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively), whereas fasting plasma glucose did not. On the other hand, HbA_1c, but not fasting plasma glucose, decreased linearly with increase in years after smoking cessation (P for trend <0.001). These graded relationships persisted significantly after controlling for the confounders, including total energy intake, current drinking, regular exercise, depressive symptoms, and BMI. In addition, a homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein also showed similar trends.

Conclusions

Smoking and its cessation showed dose- and time-dependent relationship with glycemic control and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These findings may highlight the importance of smoking cessation in the clinical management of diabetes mellitus.     

Determinants of the Changes in Glycemic Control with Exercise Training in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Aims

To assess the determinants of exercise training-induced improvements in glucose control (HbA_1C) including changes in serum total adiponectin and FFA concentrations, and skeletal muscle peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) protein content.

Methods

A sub-cohort (n = 35; 48% men; 74% Caucasian) from the HART-D study undertaking muscle biopsies before and after 9 months of aerobic (AT), resistance (RT), or combination training (ATRT).

Results

Changes in HbA_1C were associated with changes in adiponectin (r = −0.45, P = 0.007). Participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for a longer duration had the largest increase in PGC-1α (r = 0.44, P = 0.008). Statistical modeling examining changes in HbA_1C suggested that male sex (P = 0.05), non-Caucasian ethnicity (P = 0.02), duration of type 2 diabetes (r = 0.40; P<0.002) and changes in FFA (r = 0.36; P<0.004), adiponectin (r = −0.26; P<0.03), and PGC-1α (r = −0.28; P = 0.02) explain ∼65% of the variability in the changes in HbA_1C.

Conclusions

Decreases in HbA_1C after 9 months of exercise were associated with shorter duration of diabetes, lowering of serum FFA concentrations, increasing serum adiponectin concentrations and increasing skeletal muscle PGC-1α protein expression.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00458133","term_id":"NCT00458133"}}NCT00458133     

Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia in Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveThe incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing at an alarming rate, especially in ethnic minorities, and T2DM is associated with significant comorbidities. The primary objective of this study was to assess glycemic control and cardiovascular risk outcomes in children with T2DM at 1 year after diagnosis. We also assessed whether insulin treatment at onset of diabetes is beneficial for overall outcome in those with elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C).MethodsA retrospective electronic chart review of non-Hispanic white (NHW) and African American (AA) children with T2DM.ResultsA total of 86 patients (66.3% females, 79.1% AA, mean age, 13.8 ± 2.4 years) with T2DM were included. Analyses of therapeutic outcome measures at the 1-year follow-up showed HbA1C <8% in 27.7% of patients, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >130 mg/dL in 12.5%, non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) >160 mg/dL in 15.6%, HDL-C <35 mg/dL in 25%, systolic hypertension (HTN) in 35.6%, and diastolic HTN in 6.8% of subjects. Among those started on insulin at initial diagnosis, there was significant improvement in glycemic outcomes (P<.0001 on insulin vs. P = .02 not on insulin) and dyslipidemia (total cholesterol [TC] [P = .001], LDL-C [P = .02], HDL-C [P = .01], non-HDL-C [P = .0002], and TC/HDL-C [P = .005]) compared with no significant change among those who did not receive insulin at diagnosis.ConclusionSubstantial numbers of children with T2DM do not achieve glycemic and cardiovascular therapeutic goals 1 year after diagnosis. Insulin therapy at diagnosis has significant beneficial effects on diabetic dyslipidemia in those with higher HbA1C. (Endocr Pract. 2013; 19:972-979)     

Periodontal Disease in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Influence of Pubertal Stage and Glycemic Control

ObjectiveThough gingivitis is common in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), the overall periodontal health in T1DM during the pubertal stage is less well-characterized. The study was undertaken to explore the possible influence of puberty and metabolic derangement on periodontal health in T1DM.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 110 subjects between 10-18 years with T1DM and 52 healthy siblings of similar age were evaluated for pubertal stage, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and periodontal health. Simplified oral hygiene index (OHIS), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PPD) were evaluated at 4 sites per tooth as per 6 Ramfjord index teeth used to assess periodontal disease (PD).ResultsPD not merely gingivitis was significantly higher in T1DM (84/110, 76.36%) than the control group (28/52, 53.8%) (P = .004). Irrespective of pubertal status, children with T1DM had worse GI, PI, BOP, and PPD than nondiabetic subjects, although OHIS was better in diabetes. In both T1DM and nondiabetic subjects, pubertal subjects showed significantly worse OHIS, PPD, BOP, and GI than prepubertal subjects. PD was correlated with pubertal stage, age, and HbA1c, although less strongly with the duration of diabetes. In logistic regression, pubertal stage was a stronger predictor of PD (OR = 14.26) than age (OR = 2.22), and HbA1c (OR = 1.5) rather than the presence of diabetes and its duration.ConclusionsThough pubertal status, age, and poor glycemic control rather than the presence of diabetes and its duration are associated with gingivitis and other forms of PD, puberty had a more profound effect in the pathogenesis of PD in T1DM.     

利拉鲁肽对二甲双胍控制不佳的肥胖/超重2型糖尿病患者氧化应激、NLRP3炎症小体及脂肪因子水平的影响

摘要 目的：探讨利拉鲁肽对二甲双胍控制不佳的肥胖/超重2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者氧化应激、NLRP3炎症小体及脂肪因子水平的影响。方法：选择2018年2月-2020年1月期间河北北方学院附属第一医院收治的二甲双胍控制不佳的肥胖/超重T2DM患者160例。按照随机数字表法将患者分为对照组（80例,阿卡波糖治疗）和研究组（80例,阿卡波糖联合利拉鲁肽治疗）。观察两组的收缩压（SBP）、腰臀比（WHR）、体质量指数（BMI）、胰岛素抵抗指标、糖脂代谢指标、氧化应激指标、核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域样受体蛋白3（NLRP3）炎症小体及脂肪因子水平变化情况。结果：两组治疗后BMI、WHR、SBP均下降,且研究组的下降幅度更大（P<0.05）。两组治疗后胰岛?茁细胞分泌功能指数（HOMA-?茁）升高,胰岛素抵抗指数（HOMA-IR）下降,且研究组的改变幅度更大（P<0.05）。两组治疗后甘油三酯（TG）、总胆固醇（TC）、糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇（LDL-C）、空腹血糖（FPG）下降,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（HDL-C）升高,且研究组的改变幅度更大（P<0.05）。两组治疗后丙二醛（MDA）下降,谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶（GSH-PX）、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）升高,且研究组的改变幅度更大（P<0.05）。两组治疗后NLRP3炎症小体均下降,且研究组的改变幅度更大（P<0.05）。两组治疗后脂联素升高,瘦素下降,且研究组的改变幅度更大（P<0.05）。结论：利拉鲁肽应用于治疗二甲双胍控制不佳的肥胖/超重T2DM患者,可减轻氧化应激,有效改善糖脂代谢,调节NLRP3炎症小体及脂肪因子水平。