Non-B DNA conformations, mutagenesis and disease

Recent discoveries have revealed that simple repeating DNA sequences, which are known to adopt non-B DNA conformations (such as triplexes, cruciforms, slipped structures, left-handed Z-DNA and tetraplexes), are mutagenic. The mutagenesis is due to the non-B DNA conformation rather than to the DNA sequence per se in the orthodox right-handed Watson-Crick B-form. The human genetic consequences of these non-B structures are approximately 20 neurological diseases, approximately 50 genomic disorders (caused by gross deletions, inversions, duplications and translocations), and several psychiatric diseases involving polymorphisms in simple repeating sequences. Thus, the convergence of biochemical, genetic and genomic studies has demonstrated a new paradigm implicating the non-B DNA conformations as the mutagenesis specificity determinants, not the sequences as such.     

Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications

Translocations in chromosomes alter genetic information. Although the frequent translocations observed in many tumors suggest the altered genetic information by translocation could promote tumorigenesis, the mechanisms for how translocations are suppressed and produced are poorly understood. The smc6-9 mutation increased the translocation class gross chromosomal rearrangement (GCR). Translocations produced in the smc6-9 strain are unique because they are non-reciprocal and dependent on break-induced replication (BIR) and independent of non-homologous end joining. The high incidence of translocations near repetitive sequences such as delta sequences, ARS, tRNA genes, and telomeres in the smc6-9 strain indicates that Smc5-Smc6 suppresses translocations by reducing DNA damage at repetitive sequences. Synergistic enhancements of translocations in strains defective in DNA damage checkpoints by the smc6-9 mutation without affecting de novo telomere addition class GCR suggest that Smc5-Smc6 defines a new pathway to suppress GCR formation.     

Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements

Inverted DNA repeats are known to cause genomic instabilities. Here we demonstrate that double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) introduced a large distance from inverted repeats in the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) chromosome lead to a burst of genomic instability. Inverted repeats located as far as 21 kb from each other caused chromosome rearrangements in response to a single DSB. We demonstrate that the DSB initiates a pairing interaction between inverted repeats, resulting in the formation of large dicentric inverted dimers. Furthermore, we observed that propagation of cells containing inverted dimers led to gross chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations, truncations, and amplifications. Finally, our data suggest that break-induced replication is responsible for the formation of translocations resulting from anaphase breakage of inverted dimers. We propose a model explaining the formation of inverted dicentric dimers by intermolecular single-strand annealing (SSA) between inverted DNA repeats. According to this model, anaphase breakage of inverted dicentric dimers leads to gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCR). This "SSA-GCR" pathway is likely to be important in the repair of isochromatid breaks resulting from collapsed replication forks, certain types of radiation, or telomere aberrations that mimic isochromatid breaks.     

Non-reciprocal chromosomal bridge-induced translocation (BIT) by targeted DNA integration in yeast

Several experimental in vivo systems exist that generate reciprocal translocations between engineered chromosomal loci of yeast or Drosophila, but not without previous genome modifications. Here we report the successful induction of chromosome translocations in unmodified yeast cells via targeted DNA integration of the KAN^R selectable marker flanked by sequences homologous to two chromosomal loci randomly chosen on the genome. Using this bridge-induced translocation system, 2% of the integrants showed targeted translocations between chromosomes V-VIII and VIII-XV in two wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. All the translocation events studied were found to be non-reciprocal and the fate of their chromosomal fragments that were not included in the translocated chromosome was followed. The recovery of discrete-sized fragments suggested multiple pathway repair of their free DNA ends. We propose that centromere-distal chromosome fragments may be processed by a break-induced replication mechanism ensuing in partial trisomy. The experimental feasibility of inducing chromosomal translocations between any two desired genetic loci in a eukaryotic model system will be instrumental in elucidating the molecular mechanism underlying genome rearrangements generated by DNA integration and the gross chromosomal rearrangements characteristic of many types of cancer.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at     

De novo microdeletion on an inherited Robertsonian translocation chromosome: a cause for dysmorphism in the apparently balanced translocation carrier.

Robertsonian translocations are usually ascertained through abnormal children, making proposed phenotypic effects of apparently balanced translocations difficult to study in an unbiased way. From molecular genetic studies, though, some apparently balanced rearrangements are now known to be associated with phenotypic abnormalities resulting from uniparental disomy. Molecular explanations for other cases in which abnormality is seen in a balanced translocation carrier are being sought. In the present paper, an infant is described who has retarded growth, developmental delay, gross muscular hypotonia, slender habitus, frontal bossing, micrognathia, hooked nose, abundant wispy hair, and blue sclerae. Cytogenetically, she appeared to be a carrier of a balanced, paternally derived 14;21 Robertsonian translocation. Analysis of DNA polymorphisms showed that she had no paternal allele at the D14S13 locus (14q32). Study of additional DNA markers within 14q32 revealed that her previously undescribed phenotype results from an interstitial microdeletion within 14q32. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was used to show that this microdeletion had occurred de novo on the Robertsonian translocation chromosome. These observations may reactivate old suspicions of a causal association between Robertsonian translocations and de novo rearrangements in offspring; a systematic search for similar subcytogenetic rearrangements in other families, in which there are phenotypically abnormal children with apparently balanced translocations, may be fruitful. The clinical and molecular genetic data presented also define a new contiguous gene syndrome due to interstitial 14q32 deletion.     

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of 17 rob(13q14q) Robertsonian translocations by FISH, narrowing the region containing the breakpoints.

We have characterized 17 rob(13q14q) Robertsonian translocations, using six molecular probes that hybridize to the repetitive sequences of the centromeric and shortarm regions of the five acrocentric chromosomes by FISH. The rearrangements include six de novo rearrangements and the chromosomally normal parents, five maternally and three paternally inherited translocations, and three translocations of unknown origin. The D21Z1/D13Z1 and D14Z1/D22Z1 centromeric alpha-satellite DNA probes showed all rob(13q14q) chromosomes to be dicentric. The rDNA probes did not show hybridization on any of the 17 cases studied. The pTRS-47 satellite III DNA probe specific for chromosomes 14 and 22 was retained around the breakpoints in all cases. However, the pTRS-63 satellite III DNA probe specific for chromosome 14 did not show any signals on the translocation chromosomes examined. In 16 of 17 translocations studied, strong hybridization signals on the translocations were detected with the pTRI-6 satellite I DNA probe specific for chromosome 13. All parents of the six de novo rob(13q14q), including one whose pTRI-6 sequence was lost, showed strong positive hybridization signals on each pair of chromosomes 14 and 13, with pTRS-47, pTRS-63, and pTRI-6. Therefore, the translocation breakpoints in the majority of rob(13q14q) are between the pTRS-47 and pTRS-63 sequences in the p11 region of chromosome 14 and between the pTRI-6 and rDNA sequences within the p11 region of chromosome 13.     

Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements Mediated by Break-Induced Replication Involve Structure-Selective Endonucleases

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair occurring in repeated DNA sequences often leads to the generation of chromosomal rearrangements. Homologous recombination normally ensures a faithful repair of DSBs through a mechanism that transfers the genetic information of an intact donor template to the broken molecule. When only one DSB end shares homology to the donor template, conventional gene conversion fails to occur and repair can be channeled to a recombination-dependent replication pathway termed break-induced replication (BIR), which is prone to produce chromosome non-reciprocal translocations (NRTs), a classical feature of numerous human cancers. Using a newly designed substrate for the analysis of DSB–induced chromosomal translocations, we show that Mus81 and Yen1 structure-selective endonucleases (SSEs) promote BIR, thus causing NRTs. We propose that Mus81 and Yen1 are recruited at the strand invasion intermediate to allow the establishment of a replication fork, which is required to complete BIR. Replication template switching during BIR, a feature of this pathway, engenders complex chromosomal rearrangements when using repeated DNA sequences dispersed over the genome. We demonstrate here that Mus81 and Yen1, together with Slx4, also promote template switching during BIR. Altogether, our study provides evidence for a role of SSEs at multiple steps during BIR, thus participating in the destabilization of the genome by generating complex chromosomal rearrangements.     

Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The accumulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) is a characteristic of many types of cancer cells, although it is unclear what defects cause these rearrangements and how the different types of GCRs observed are formed. In the present study, we have used a Saccharomyces cerevisiae system for measuring GCRs to analyze the ability of a variety of DNA damaging agents to induce GCRs. The two most potent inducers of GCRs observed were methyl methane sulfonate (MMS) and HO-endonuclease-induced double strand breaks (DSBs). Bleomycin, camptothecan and gamma-irradiation induced intermediate levels of GCRs and cisplatin induced very low levels of GCRs whereas N-methyl-NPRIME;-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) primarily induced base substitution mutations. MMS treatment primarily induced rearrangements in which the end of a chromosome was deleted and a new telomere was added (telomere additions) and also induced translocations. Consistent with this GCR spectrum, the formation of MMS-induced GCRs was primarily dependent on telomere maintenance functions and were completely eliminated in mutants that were defective for both telomere maintenance functions and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In contrast, HO-endonuclease DSBs induced mostly translocations and interstitial deletions whereas few telomere additions were observed. Genetic analysis indicated that HO DSB-induced GCRs were suppressed by a number of pathways including the DNA damage checkpoints, DSB repair pathways and NHEJ.     

RAD59 is required for efficient repair of simultaneous double-strand breaks resulting in translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Exposure to ionizing radiation results in a variety of genome rearrangements that have been linked to tumor formation. Many of these rearrangements are thought to arise from the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) by several mechanisms, including homologous recombination (HR) between repetitive sequences dispersed throughout the genome. Doses of radiation sufficient to create DSBs in or near multiple repetitive elements simultaneously could initiate single-strand annealing (SSA), a highly efficient, though mutagenic, mode of DSB repair. We have investigated the genetic control of the formation of translocations that occur spontaneously and those that form after the generation of DSBs adjacent to homologous sequences on two, non-homologous chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that mutations in a variety of DNA repair genes have distinct effects on break-stimulated translocation. Furthermore, the genetic requirements for repair using 300bp and 60bp recombination substrates were different, suggesting that the SSA apparatus may be altered in response to changing substrate lengths. Notably, RAD59 was found to play a particularly significant role in recombination between the short substrates that was partially independent of that of RAD52. The high frequency of these events suggests that SSA may be an important mechanism of genome rearrangement following acute radiation exposure.     

Non-consensus heptamer sequences destabilize the RAG post-cleavage complex,making ends available to alternative DNA repair pathways

V(D)J recombination entails double-stranded DNA cleavage at the antigen receptor loci by the RAG1/2 proteins, which recognize conserved recombination signal sequences (RSSs) adjoining variable (V), diversity (D) and joining (J) gene segments. After cleavage, RAG1/2 remain associated with the coding and signal ends (SE) in a post-cleavage complex (PCC), which is critical for their proper joining by classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Certain mutations in RAG1/2 destabilize the PCC, allowing DNA ends to access inappropriate repair pathways such as alternative NHEJ, an error-prone pathway implicated in chromosomal translocations. The PCC is thus thought to discourage aberrant rearrangements by controlling repair pathway choice. Since interactions between RAG1/2 and the RSS heptamer element are especially important in forming the RAG-SE complex, we hypothesized that non-consensus heptamer sequences might affect PCC stability. We find that certain non-consensus heptamers, including a cryptic heptamer implicated in oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements, destabilize the PCC, allowing coding and SEs to be repaired by non-standard pathways, including alternative NHEJ. These data suggest that some non-consensus RSS, frequently present at chromosomal translocations in lymphoid neoplasms, may promote genomic instability by a novel mechanism, disabling the PCC’s ability to restrict repair pathway choice.     

Direction of chromosome rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of his3 recombinational substrates.

We used the his3 recombinational substrates (his3 fragments) to direct large interchromosomal (translocations) and intrachromosomal (deletions and tandem duplications) rearrangements in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In strains completely deleted for the wild-type HIS3 gene, his3 fragments, one containing a deletion of 5' amino acid coding sequences and the other containing a deletion of 3' amino acid coding sequences, were first placed at preselected sites by homologous recombination. His+ revertants that arose via spontaneous mitotic recombination between the two his3 fragments were selected. This strategy was used to direct rearrangements in both RAD52+ and rad52 mutant strains. Translocations occurred in the RAD52+ genetic background and were characterized by orthogonal field alternating gel electrophoresis of yeast chromosomal DNA and by standard genetic techniques. An unexpected translocation was also identified in which HIS3 sequences were amplified. Two types of tandem duplications of the GAL(7, 10, 1) locus were also directed, and one type was not observed in rad52 mutants. Recombination mechanisms are discussed to account for these differences.     

Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability

Repetitive DNA sequences are abundant in eukaryotic genomes, and many of these sequences have the potential to adopt non-B DNA conformations. Genes harboring non-B DNA structure-forming sequences increase the risk of genetic instability and thus are associated with human diseases. In this review, we discuss putative mechanisms responsible for genetic instability events occurring at these non-B DNA structures, with a focus on hairpins, left-handed Z-DNA, and intramolecular triplexes or H-DNA. Slippage and misalignment are the most common events leading to DNA structure-induced mutagenesis. However, a number of other mechanisms of genetic instability have been proposed based on the finding that these structures not only induce expansions and deletions, but can also induce DNA strand breaks and rearrangements. The available data implicate a variety of proteins, such as mismatch repair proteins, nucleotide excision repair proteins, topoisomerases, and structure specific-nucleases in the processing of these mutagenic DNA structures. The potential mechanisms of genetic instability induced by these structures and their contribution to human diseases are discussed.     

Increased genetic instability of the common fragile site at 3p14 after integration of exogenous DNA.

We determined previously that the selectable marker pSV2neo is preferentially inserted into chromosomal fragile sites in human x hamster hybrid cells in the presence of an agent (aphidicolin) that induces fragile-site expression. In contrast, cells transfected without fragile-site induction showed an essentially random integration pattern. To determine whether the integration of marker DNA at fragile sites affects the frequency of fragile-site expression, the parental hybrid and three transfectants (two with pSV2neo integrated at the fragile site at 3p14.2 [FRA3B] and specific hamster fragile sites [chromosome 1, bands q26-31, or mar2, bands q11-13] and one with pSV2neo integrated at sites that are not fragile sites) were treated with aphidicolin. After 24 h the two cell lines with plasmid integration at FRA3B showed structural rearrangements at that site; these rearrangements accounted for 43%-67% of the total deletions and translocations observed. Structural rearrangements were not observed in the parental cell line. After 5 d aphidicolin treatment, the observed excess in frequency of structural rearrangements at FRA3B in the cell lines with pSV2neo integration at 3p14 over that in the two lines without FRA3B integration was less dramatic, but nonetheless significant. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of these cells, using a biotin-labeled pSV2neo probe, showed results consistent with the gross rearrangements detected cytogenetically in the lines with FRA3B integration; however, the pSV2neo sequences were frequently deleted concomitantly with translocations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

T-DNA-associated duplication/translocations in Arabidopsis. Implications for mutant analysis and functional genomics

T-DNA insertion mutants have become a valuable resource for studies of gene function in Arabidopsis. In the course of both forward and reverse genetic projects, we have identified novel interchromosomal rearrangements in two Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion lines. Both rearrangements were unilateral translocations associated with the left borders of T-DNA inserts that exhibited normal Mendelian segregation. In one study, we characterized the embryo-defective88 mutation. Although emb88 had been mapped to chromosome I, molecular analysis of DNA adjacent to the T-DNA left border revealed sequence from chromosome V. Simple sequence length polymorphism mapping of the T-DNA insertion demonstrated that a >40-kbp region of chromosome V had inserted with the T-DNA into the emb88 locus on chromosome I. A similar scenario was observed with a prospective T-DNA knockout allele of the LIGHT-REGULATED RECEPTOR PROTEIN KINASE (LRRPK) gene. Whereas wild-type LRRPK is on lower chromosome IV, mapping of the T-DNA localized the disrupted LRRPK allele to chromosome V. In both these cases, the sequence of a single T-DNA-flanking region did not provide an accurate picture of DNA disruption because flanking sequences had duplicated and inserted, with the T-DNA, into other chromosomal locations. Our results indicate that T-DNA insertion lines--even those that exhibit straightforward genetic behavior--may contain an unexpectedly high frequency of rearrangements. Such duplication/translocations can interfere with reverse genetic analyses and provide misleading information about the molecular basis of mutant phenotypes. Simple mapping and polymerase chain reaction methods for detecting such rearrangements should be included as a standard step in T-DNA mutant analysis.     

Analysis of the barley and rice genomes by comparative RFLP linkage mapping

Comparative genetic mapping of rice and barley, both major crop species with extensive genetic resources, offers the possibility of uniting two well-established and characterized genetic systems. In the present study, we screened 229 molecular markers and utilized 110 polymorphic orthologous loci to construct comparative maps of the rice and barley genomes. While extensive chromosomal rearrangements, including inversions and intrachromosomal translocations, differentiate the rice and barley genomes, several syntenous chromosomes are evident. Indeed, several chromosomes and chromosome arms appear to share nearly identical gene content and gene order. Seventeen regions of conserved organization were detected, spanning 287 cM (24%) and 321 cM (31%) of the rice and barley genomes, respectively. The results also indicate that most (72%) of the single-copy sequences in barley are also single copy in rice, suggesting that the large barley genome arose by unequal crossing over and amplification of repetitive DNA sequences and not by the duplication of single-copy sequences. Combining these results with those previously reported for comparative analyses of rice and wheat identified nine putatively syntenous chromosomes among barley, wheat and rice. The high degree of gene-order conservation as detected by comparative mapping has astonishing implications for interpreting genetic information among species and for elucidating chromosome evolution and speciation.     

The hidden side of unstable DNA repeats: Mutagenesis at a distance

Structure-prone DNA repeats are common components of genomic DNA in all kingdoms of life. In humans, these repeats are linked to genomic instabilities that result in various hereditary disorders, including many cancers. It has long been known that DNA repeats are not only highly polymorphic in length but can also cause chromosomal fragility and stimulate gross chromosomal rearrangements, i.e., deletions, duplications, inversions, translocations and more complex shuffles. More recently, it has become clear that inherently unstable DNA repeats dramatically elevate mutation rates in surrounding DNA segments and that these mutations can occur up to ten kilobases away from the repetitive tract, a phenomenon we call repeat-induced mutagenesis (RIM). This review describes experimental data that led to the discovery and characterization of RIM and discusses the molecular mechanisms that could account for this phenomenon.     

Rearrangement of duplicated DNA in specialized cells of Neurospora

Introduction of DNA into Neurospora crassa can lead to sequence instability in the sexual phase of the life cycle. Sequence instability was investigated by using a set of strains transformed with single copies of a plasmid including host sequences, Neurospora sequences deleted from the host genome, and foreign sequences. The sequences already represented in the host were rearranged at high frequency in a cross. In general, both elements of the duplication, that from the plasmid and that from the host, became rearranged, whether or not they were linked. Unique sequences were left unaltered. Cytosine residues in the rearranged sequences typically became methylated de novo. Results from tetrad analyses indicated that the rearrangements occur before meiosis, during a stage between fertilization and karyogamy. We suggest that this previously unrecognized genetic process, RIP (rearrangement induced premeiotically), may contribute diversity for evolution and also maintain the gross organization of the genome.     

Etoposide and illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair in the generation of MLL translocations: new insights and new questions

Faithful repair of chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs) is central to genome integrity and the suppression of genome rearrangements including translocations that are a hallmark of leukemia, lymphoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas [B. Elliott, M. Jasin, Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59 (2002) 373-385; D.C. van Gent, J.H. Hoeijmakers, R. Kanaar, Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection, Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 196-206]. Chemotherapy agents that target the essential cellular enzyme topoisomerase II (topo II) are known promoters of DSBs and are associated with therapy-related leukemias. There is a clear clinical association between previous exposure to etoposide and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) characterized by chromosomal rearrangements involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene on chromosome band 11q23 [C.A. Felix, Leukemias related to treatment with DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors, Med. Pediatr. Oncol. 36 (2001) 525-535]. Most MLL rearrangements initiate within a well-characterized 8.3 kb region that contains both putative topo II cleavage recognition sequences and repetitive elements leading to the logical hypothesis that MLL is particularly susceptible to aberrant cleavage and homology-mediated fusion to repetitive elements located on novel chromosome partners. In this review, we will discuss the findings and implications of recent attempts to confirm this hypothesis.     

Comparison of filler DNA at immune, nonimmune, and oncogenic rearrangements suggests multiple mechanisms of formation.

Extra nucleotides (termed filler DNA) are commonly found at the junctions of genetic rearrangements in mammalian cells. The filler DNA at immune system rearrangements, which are called N regions, are generated at VDJ joints primarily by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. However, the origin of filler DNA at genetic rearrangements in nonlymphoid cells is uncertain. In an analysis of more than 200 junctions that arose by circularization of transfected linear DNA (D. B. Roth and J. H. Wilson, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:4295-4304, 1986), we found 18 junctions with extra nucleotides exactly at the point of circularization. Analysis of these 18 junctions indicated that nonlymphoid cells could add extra nucleotides to the ends of duplex DNA. The characteristics of the extra nucleotides at these junctions and at 31 other rearrangement junctions from nonlymphoid cells were quite similar, suggesting that many genetic rearrangements may pass through a stage with free DNA ends. A comparison of the filler DNA at these 49 nonimmune system rearrangements with 97 N regions derived from immune system rearrangements suggested that lymphoid and nonlymphoid cells use different mechanisms for insertion of filler DNA, as expected from the absence of detectable terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase in cells from nonlymphoid tissues. The filler DNAs at a smaller group of 22 translocations associated with cancer had features in common with both immune and nonimmune system rearrangements and therefore may represent a mixture of these two processes. Mechanisms that might account for the presence of filler DNA in nonlymphoid cells are discussed.     

DNA double-strand break repair and chromosome translocations

Translocations are genetic aberrations that occur when a broken fragment of a chromosome is erroneously rejoined to another chromosome. The initial event in the creation of a translocation is the formation of a DNA double-strand break (DSB), which can be induced both under physiological situations, such as during the development of the immune system, or by exogenous DNA damaging agents. Two major repair pathways exist in cells that repair DSBs as they arise, namely homologous recombination, and non-homologous end-joining. In some situations these pathways can function inappropriately and rejoin ends incorrectly to produce genomic rearrangements, including translocations. Translocations have been implicated in cancer because of their ability to activate oncogenes. Due to selection at the level of the DNA, the cell, and the tissue certain forms of cancer are associated with specific translocations that can be used as a tool for diagnosis and prognosis of these cancers.