Hormone evolution studies: multiplication promoting and imprinting ("memory") effects of various amino acids on Tetrahymena

Aromatic, heterocyclic, polar and non-polar amino acids were examined for imprinting potential in a unicellular (Tetrahymena) model system. Serine gave rise to positive, glycine to negative imprinting, whereas valine, tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine had no imprinting effect whatever. However, tyrosine and phenylalanine stimulated the division of Tetrahymena already at primary interaction, the former even for a relatively long time. It follows that amino acids, too, can give rise to imprinting, although their imprinting potentials are dissimilar. These phenomena have attracted attention to possible interrelationships between the supposed amino acid receptors of Tetrahymena and the evolution of amino acids to hormones.     

Dissimilar effects of L and D amino acids on the growth of Tetrahymena

Of the L and D configurations of four amino acids (phenylalanine, valine, tryptophan, tyrosine) tested for influence on the growth rate of Tetrahymena, only L-tyrosine was able to induce imprinting in Tetrahymena pyriformis Zeuthen. D-valine stimulated the division of T.pyriformis NT-1, but failed to induce imprinting. The experiments have substantiated the selectivity of the amino acid receptors of Y.pyriformis, and the extraordinary imprinting potential of tyrosine as well, as judged by its influence on the growth rate.     

The role of Ca2+ in hormonal imprinting of the Tetrahymena

It is known from model experiments on Tetrahymena that primary exposure to a hormone induces receptor formation or amplification, in other words a hormonal imprinting. Substances acting on the intracellular Ca2+ level of the Tetrahymena, such as TMB-8, EDTA, EGTA, NiCl2 and La(NO3)3, interfered with hormonal imprinting of the unicellular to different degrees, and some of them influenced hormone (insulin, TSH) binding also independently of imprinting. Interference with the intracellular Ca-metabolism generally influenced imprinting by insulin and TSH, which were mediated by different mechanisms, to dissimilar degrees, or in opposite directions. On combined application of the agents acting on Ca-metabolism, their effects were additive. It appears that intact Ca-mediation is an essential prerequisite for normal hormonal imprinting.     

Suitability of oligopeptides for induction of hormonal imprinting--implications on receptor and hormone evolution

Hormonal imprinting induced in Tetrahymena and in Chang liver cells with di-, tri-, tetra- and pentapeptides (synthetic opioids and their fragments) has shown that both cell types are able to differentiate the related molecules from one another. The dipeptide phenylalanine + proline induced a measurable imprinting in the liver cells, and chain length increase, especially terminal coupling with tyrosine enhanced the imprinting potential enormously. Intra-chain changes in the amino acid sequence had a measurable effect on the intensity of imprinting. The molecules showing the relatively strongest physiological action accounted for the most intensive imprinting in both cell types; this indicates that, in all probability, induction of binding site formation plays a key role in the development of signal molecules, and thereby in hormone evolution.     

Induction of hormone receptor formation in the unicellular tetrahymena

Studies based on treatment with antibodies to thyrotropic hormone, luteotropic hormone, growth hormone or adrenocorticotropic hormone have shown that although the unicellular Tetrahymena does not possesssui generis receptors to all polypeptide hormones, such binding structures may arise, or become established in the membrane of the unicellular Tetrahymena in the presence of exogenous hormone. The Tetrahymena subjected to hormonal imprinting still contained an increased amount of hormone after six generation changes, which suggested that either hormone production had been induced by treatment, or the internalized hormone had not been degraded intracellularly. Thus the role of hormonal imprinting in receptor formation has also been substantiated by the immunocytochemical approach used in the present study.     

Taxon-dependence of receptor level cell-to-cell communication in Tetrahymena: possible explanation for the transmission of hormonal imprinting

Insulin treatment induced in Tetrahymena pyriformis a positive hormonal imprinting, and in Tetrahymena thermophila a negative imprinting, resulting in increased and decreased binding capacity, respectively, at re-exposure to the hormone. The imprinting, or the information associated with it, is transferred by the nutrient medium of the insulin-treated cells to those not treated. The issue of transfer depends on the nature of the receiver taxon, leading always to a positive imprinting in Tetrahymena pyriformis, and to a negative imprinting in Tetrahymena thermophila, regardless of the nature of the 'imprinted' transmitter taxon. The findings substantiate the transferability of hormonal imprinting by the nutrient medium at the unicellular level, the key role of the postreceptorial mechanism in determining the trend of imprinting and may explain the persistence of imprinting in the progeny generations.     

Imprinting Effects of Proline Containing Dipeptides (Proline-Glycine, Proline-Leucine, Proline-Valine and Their Retro Variants) in Tetrahymena. Evolutionary Conclusions

Proline-glycine, proline-leucine and proline-valine dipeptides and their retro variants were used in the experiments to study the effects of pretreatment (imprinting) in Tetrahymena, by investigating fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated peptide binding. The protozoan organism could differentiate between the proline-dipeptides containing different partner amino-acids and between the dipeptides having the amino acids in reversed positions. The effect of imprinting was positive or negative and this was dependent on the type of the partner amino acid and on its position. Pro-Gly and Pro-Leu induced positive imprinting (elevated FITC-dipeptide binding) and Pro-Val induced negative imprinting (decrease of FITC-peptide binding). There was positive imprinting induction in two cases for the retro FITC-peptide and in one case for the FITC-conjugate of the imprinter peptide itself. The highest positive imprinting (almost 60% increase) was induced by Pro-Gly for FITC-Gly-Pro. Considering earlier—chemotaxis—experiments, the results of the present—binding—studies run parallel with the physiological effects. The experiments call attention to the sharp differentiating ability of small peptides at a unicellular level, that could have some role in the selection of molecules for hormone formation, during evolution.     

Interrelationships between the imprinting potential and biological activity of insulin derivatives: studies on Tetrahymena and Chang liver cells

Insulin dimers deprived of biological activity by linking with suberic acid symmetrically in position B29 or B1 were not able to induce imprinting. Lack of N-terminal phenylalanine or even of five C-terminal amino acids did not interfere with imprinting, regardless of whether or not it was associated with an activity loss. It appears that while hormonal imprinting is closely associated with the hormone's ability to bind to the receptor, it may be related as well as unrelated to the hormone's biological activity. The imprinted Tetrahymena and Chang cells bound the insulin and its derivatives in a similar manner.     

Discrepancy in hormone binding and information transfer between sister cells of Tetrahymena clones

Tetrahymena cells treated with insulin in mass cultures were separated to single-cell clones or one of the "sister-cells" of dividing Tetrahymena (in single-cell culture) was treated with insulin. In both cases the FITC-insulin binding of sister-cells were compared. The insulin imprinting significantly increased the insulin binding of cells. There was also a significant difference between the imprinted and not imprinted sisters as well as between the not imprinted sisters. This demonstrates the existence of a difference (in hormone binding) between sister-cells and justifies that the information of the first hormone treatment (imprinting) is not equally divided between the sister-cells.     

Induction of steroid binding sites (receptors) and presence of steroid hormones in the unicellular Tetrahymena pyriformis

The unicellular Tetrahymena does not normally possess a steroid hormone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA) or a glucocorticoid (dexamethasone) receptor, but both kinds of receptor can be induced in it by pretreatment (imprinting) with the adequate hormone. The specific receptors which arise are demonstrable experimentally. Examination of Tetrahymena cells for endogenous steroids by the radioimmunoassay (RIA) technique detected an appreciable concentration of DHEA and DHEA sulphate, and lesser concentrations of testosterone and estradiol in this unicellular organism.     

Study of the imprinting and overlap of insulin and concanavalin-A at the receptor level in a protozoan (Tetrahymena) model system

In a protozoan (Tetrahymena) model system, insulin treatment produced a long-term imprinting which upon re-exposure to the hormone resulted in an enhanced binding of the hormone. Insulin pretreatment produced similar effect with regard to the binding of concanavalin-A. Concanavalin-A could only induce a short-term imprinting for itself and was not capable at all of inducing imprinting for insulin. Based on the results of this study it appears that the binding of the sugar component of the receptor, which can be achieved also by lectin, is not sufficient to induce imprinting but the whole (hormone) molecule is needed.     

Receptor-level interrelationships of amino acids and the adequate amino acid type hormones in Tetrahymena: a receptor evolution model

Histidine stimulates the phagocytosis of Tetrahymena to the same extent as histamine, and also stimulates its division, which histamine does not. Tyrosine and diiodotyrosine equally stimulate the growth of the Tetrahymena. Both amino acids inhibit the characteristic influence of the adequate amino acid hormone when added to Tetrahymena culture 72 h in advance of it. Primary interaction with diiodotyrosine and tyrosine notably increases the cellular growth rate. Histamine has a similar, although less notable effect than histidine. In the light of these experimental observations there is reason to postulate that the receptors of the amino acid hormones have developed from amino acid receptors.     

Influence of enkephalins on the ACTH-induced hormonal imprinting in tetrahymena

Both adrenocorticotrop hormone (ACTH) and the synthetic enkephalins investigated evoked imprinting in Tetrahymena and led to increased hormone binding at further contact with ACTH. Neither molecule evoked, however, imprinting for the enkephalins. The pentapeptide enkephalin containing also proline had the most pronounced imprinting effect and, when given together with ACTH, it increased the imprintatory effect of ACTH considerably. In all the situations investigated the enkephalin tetrapeptide inhibited the positive effect of the enkephalin pentapeptide, whereas it did not influence the imprintatory effect of ACTH. Similarities can be found between the pharmacological and imprinting effects of enkephalin in mammals, and the effects seen in the present investigations.     

Experimental observations on the mechanism of hormonal imprinting: influence of actinomycin D, methylamine and colchicine on receptor memory in a unicellular model system

The first interaction between target cell and hormone gives rise to hormonal imprinting, which accounts for greater responsiveness of the cell at later interactions. The mechanism of hormonal imprinting is obscure; we based experimental approach to its closer study on combined treatment of Tetrahymena, as model cells, with diiodotyrosine (T2), which stimulates the division, and cell growth inhibitors, which interfere with different stages of cell reproduction, and methylamine, which inhibits cluster formation in the membrane. Of these, actinomycin D and methylamine inhibited the growth of the Tetrahymena, while colchicine did not, and all three suppressed the division stimulating action of T2, but could not prevent hormonal imprinting, as demonstrated on later re-exposure to T2 of cells preexposed and not preexposed to T2 in combination with the inhibitors. It appears that the underlying mechanism of hormonal imprinting is highly complex, and involves many subcellular mechanisms and structures, but suppression of, or gross interference with, one or another of these cannot delete, only quantitatively reduce, the consequence of the first interaction with the hormone, i.e. hormonal imprinting.     

Effect of inhibition of endocytosis, recycling and lysosomal activity on the insulin binding capacity and imprintability of Tetrahymena

Dinitrophenol (DNP), an inhibitor of endocytosis of hormone receptors, Tris, an inhibitor of recycling and chloroquine, an inhibitor of lysosomal degradation, all decreased the binding of insulin and inhibited the development of hormonal imprinting in Tetrahymena. The effects of DNP and Tris seemed to be similar even quantitatively. The effect of chloroquine proved to be somewhat different, it appeared later, was more pronounced after 24 hours and more marked when insulin was also administered. Combined administration of Tris + DNP inhibited the binding of insulin but this inhibition was the one which disappeared most completely after 24 hours and the one where the inhibition of imprinting was the most pronounced. Tris + chloroquine led to severe destruction of the cells. The conclusion has been drawn that the inhibition of membrane circulation inhibits not only the hormone binding but also the development of imprinting in Tetrahymena.     

Influence of hormone treatment applied or begun in different phases of the cell cycle on hormonal imprinting in Tetrahymena

Primary exposure to a hormone (hormonal imprinting) alters--in the case of the Tetrahymena increases--cellular response to re-exposure(s) to the same hormone. The intensity of hormonal imprinting depends on the phase of the cell cycle in which the primary exposure has taken place. The effect of imprinting was greater on the cells exposed to the hormone in phase G1 than on those exposed in phase S or G2. The response pattern of the progeny generations corresponded to that of the primarily exposed (imprinted) ancestor cell, irrespective of their own pre-exposure in phase G1, G2 or S of their cycle.     

Insulin pretreatment (imprinting) produces elevated capacity in the insulin binding of Tetrahymena. Different binding by the cilia of the body and oral field

Gold-labeled insulin is bound first of all to the cilia of the oral field of Tetrahymena. A primary treatment (hormonal imprinting) with insulin increases the binding capacity even after 24h and makes it more sensitive for appearance a week later, within a minute of giving insulin-gold. The food vacuoles contain insulin-gold in pretreated cells or without pretreatment as well, though in imprinted situations the label can be found in pinocytotic vesicles at the bases of cilia in the oral field. Altogether, a functional difference can be observed between the cilia of the oral and non-oral surfaces of Tetrahymena and hormonal imprinting has a specifying effect on the binding of labeled hormone.     

Immunocytochemical verification of the insulin receptor's specificity in the nuclear envelope of Tetrahymena. Comparison with receptors of the plasma membrane

The unicellular Tetrahymena possess hormone receptors in the nuclear envelope similarly to higher rank animals. These receptors bind insulin and their specificity is detectable by monoclonal antibodies developed to insulin. The hormonal (insulin) pretreatment (imprinting) of the cell did not alter the binding capacity of the nuclear membrane, demonstrated by antibody-technique. The specific binding characteristics of the plasma membrane was demonstrated and this was significantly increased following imprinting. In the nucleus of Tetrahymena presence of insulin was not detected by immunocytochemical method.     

Involvement of selection and amplification mechanisms in hormone receptor development in a unicellular model system

It was demonstrated earlier, that long lasting exposure of Tetrahymena to a hormone (histamine) resulted in an increased responsiveness to a later re-exposure. However, it was difficult to establish whether selection or amplification plays a role in receptor differentiation. As diiodotyrosine (T2) enhances the growth of Tetrahymena, in the present experiment the effect of T2-treatment on a long-term culture of Tetrahymena pyriformis was analysed by mathematical-statistical methods to differentiate the effects of selection and amplification mechanisms on hormone receptor development. Although continuous and periodic treatment with T2 enhanced cell division equally, the resulting populations differed in structure. On continuous treatment the population tended to become inhomogenous. The variance tended to increase for 9 days and decreased afterwards without, however, returning to the control level. On periodic treatment the variance was the same as in the control group, but the second and third exposure were significantly more effective than the first treatment, suggesting that the primary encounter with the hormone had given rise to lasting alterations (hormonal imprinting). It follows that continuous exposure involves a selection process which does not, however, account for a steady increase of the growth rate; for initial amplification, taking place also in this condition, and selection which takes effect later, compensate one another's effects. Regarding the unicellular experimental system as a phylo- and ontogenetic model, the conclusion lies close at hand that the selection and amplication mechanisms promote hormone receptor development by joint rather than alternate action.     

Studies of hormone evolution. Can non-hormone oligopeptides induce a functional imprinting?

Certain non-hormone oligopeptides have a greater imprinting effect on Tetrahymena than others. The imprinting potential is unrelated to the length of the peptide chain, but seems greatly dependent on the amino acid sequence. The direct growth-stimulant action developed by the peptides at the first interaction is unrelated to their imprinting effect.