Anatomic reconstruction of the nasal tip cartilages in secondary and reconstructive rhinoplasty

Most techniques for secondary rhinoplasty assume that useful residual remnants of the tip cartilages remain, but frequently the alar cartilages are missing--unilaterally, bilaterally, completely, or incompletely--with loss of the lateral crura, middle crura, and parts of the medial crura. In such severe cases, excision of scar tissue and the residual alar remnants and their replacement with nonanatomic tip grafts have been recommended. Multiple solid, bruised, or crushed cartilage fragments are positioned in a closed pocket or solid shield-shaped grafts are fixed with sutures during an open rhinoplasty. These onlay filler grafts only increase tip projection and definition. Associated tip abnormalities (alar rim notching, columellar retraction, nostril distortion) are not addressed. Problems with graft visibility, an unnatural appearance, or malposition have been noted. Fortunately, techniques useful in reconstructive rhinoplasty can be applied to severe cosmetic secondary deformities. Anatomic cartilage replacements similar in shape, bulk, and position to normal alar cartilages can be fashioned from septal, ear, and rib cartilage, fixed to the residual medial crura and/or a columellar strut, and bent backward to restore the normal skeletal framework of the tip. During an open rhinoplasty, a fabricated and rigid framework is designed to replace the missing medial, middle, or lateral crus of one or both alar cartilages. The entire alar tripod is recreated. These anatomic alar cartilage reconstructive grafts create tip definition and projection, fill the lobule and restore the expected lateral convexity, position the columella and establish columellar length, secure and position the alar rim, and brace the external valve against collapse, support the vestibular lining, and restore a nostril shape. The anatomic form and function of the nasal tip is restored. This technique is recommended when alar cartilages are significantly destroyed or absent in secondary or reconstructive rhinoplasty and the alar remnants are insufficient for repair. Anatomically designed alar cartilage replacements allow an aesthetically structured skeleton to contour the overlying skin envelope. Problems with displacement are minimized by graft fixation. Graft visibility is used to the surgeon's advantage. A rigidly supported framework with a nasal shape can mold a covering forehead flap or the scarred tip skin of a secondary rhinoplasty and create a result that may approach normal. Anatomic alar cartilage reconstructions were used in eight reconstructive and eight secondary rhinoplasties in the last 5 years. Their use in the repair of postrhinoplasty deformities is emphasized.     

Valvular obstruction of the nasal airway.

Valvular nasal obstruction may occur in the postoperative rhinoplasty patient. One may anticipate a dropping of the tip, from residual redundant or inelastic skin, in some older patients with long noses. Measures to correct (or avoid) this may be undertaken at the time of the primary rhinoplasty. However, an overcorrection may be necessary if there is much redundant skin. Discretion may indicate the need for a secondary procedure. Lateral wall valving is unusual-but it may occur in the long, high, thin nose (where a suggestion of this action may be observed preoperatively). Maintenance of continuous cartilage along the alar rim, at the time of alar cartilage resection, appears to be important in prevention of postoperative valvular obstruction in these few patients.     

Four common anatomic variants that predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results: a study based on 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasties

A retrospective study was conducted of 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients operated on by the author before February of 1999, to test the hypothesis that four anatomic variants (low radix/low dorsum, narrow middle vault, inadequate tip projection, and alar cartilage malposition) strongly predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results. The incidences of each variant were compared with those in 50 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients. Photographs before any surgery were available in 61 percent of the secondary patients; diagnosis in the remaining individuals was made from operative reports, physical diagnosis, or patient history. Low radix/low dorsum was present in 93 percent of the secondary patients and 32 percent of the primary patients; narrow middle vault was present in 87 percent of the secondary patients and 38 percent of the primary patients; inadequate tip projection was present in 80 percent of the secondary patients and 31 percent of the primary patients; and alar cartilage malposition was present in 42 percent of the secondary patients and 18 percent of the primary patients. In the 150-patient secondary group, the most common combination was the triad of low radix, narrow middle vault, and inadequate tip projection (40 percent of patients). The second largest group (27 percent) had shared all four anatomic points before their primary rhinoplasties. Seventy-eight percent of the secondary patients had three or all four anatomic variants in some combination; each secondary patient had at least one of the four traits; 99 percent had two or more. Seventy-eight percent of the primary patients had at least two variants, and 58 percent had three or more. Twenty-two percent of the primary patients had none of the variants and therefore would presumably not be predisposed to unfavorable results following traditional reduction rhinoplasty. This study supports the contention that four common anatomic variants, if unrecognized, are strongly associated with unfavorable results following primary rhinoplasty. It is important for all surgeons performing rhinoplasty to recognize these anatomic variants to avoid the unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic sequelae that they may produce by making their correction a deliberate part of each preoperative surgical plan.     

A modified Goldman nasal tip procedure for the drooping nasal tip

A modification of Irving Goldman's nasal tip procedure that borrows from the lateral crus to augment the height of the medial crus is described. Goldman's procedure has been modified by not including the vestibular skin with the segment of the lateral crus that is rolled medially to increase nasal tip projection, by adding a nasal septal cartilage strut between the medial crura for support when the medial crura are weak, and by maintaining a small separation caudally of the repositioned lateral crura at the new nasal dome to simulate a double nasal dome. This modified Goldman nasal tip procedure allows the surgeon to reshape the lower lateral nasal cartilage to increase nasal tip projection as an alternative to the use of a shield-type nasal tip graft, and at the same time it narrows the nasal tip with minimal resection of the lateral crus of the lower lateral nasal cartilage.     

The two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observations based on review of 100 consecutive patients

Nasal tip surgery has become significantly more complex since the introduction of tip grafting and the many suture designs that followed the resurgence of open rhinoplasty. Independent of the surgeon's technical approach, however, is the need to identify the critical anatomical characteristics that will make nasal tip surgery successful. It is the author's contention that only two such features require mandatory preoperative identification: (1) whether the tip is adequately projecting and (2) whether the alar cartilage lateral crura are orthotopic or cephalically rotated ("malpositioned"). Data were generated from a review of 100 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients on whom the author had operated. The results indicate that only 33 percent of the entire group had adequate preoperative tip projection and only 54 percent had orthotopic lateral crura (axes toward the lateral canthi). Forty-six percent of the patients had lateral crura that were cephalically rotated (axes toward the medial canthi). Both inadequate tip projection and convex lateral crura were more common among patients with malpositioned lateral crura (78 percent and 61 percent) than in patients with orthotopic lateral crura (57 percent and 20 percent, respectively). Tip projection can be reliably assessed by the relationship of the tip lobule to the septal angle. Malposition is characterized by abnormal lateral crural axes, long alar creases that extend to the nostril rims, alar wall hollows, frequent nostril deformities, and associated external valvular incompetence. The data suggest that the surgeon treating the average spectrum of primary rhinoplasty patients will see a majority (61 percent) who need increased tip support and a significant number (46 percent) with an anatomical variant (alar cartilage malposition) that places these patients at special risk for postoperative functional impairment. Correction of external valvular incompetence doubles nasal airflow in most patients. As few as 23 percent of primary rhinoplasty patients (the number with orthotopic, projecting alar cartilages in this series) may be proper candidates for reduction-only tip procedures. When tip projection and lateral crural orientation are accurately determined before surgery, nasal tip surgery can proceed successfully and secondary deformities can be avoided.     

The use of alloderm for the correction of nasal contour deformities

What rhinoplasty surgeon has not been frustrated by unmet expectations from unreliable graft materials? The quest for an ideal graft continues. Septal cartilage is not always adequate in amount or substance. Ear cartilage may cause unsightly irregularities over time. Cranial bone or rib harvest sites add to the complexity of the procedure and can be intimidating for many operators. This article describes the authors' successful experience with AlloDerm onlay grafts for the correction of nasal contour deformities in 58 primary and secondary rhinoplasty cases by means of the open and endonasal approaches. Forty-two patients received an open-approach procedure; the remaining 16 received grafting through an endonasal or closed approach. Thirty-seven of the patients were secondary rhinoplasty patients, and some underwent multiple nasal corrections. The indications, intraoperative surgical technique of graft placement, and representative results will be discussed. Long-term follow-up showed good results, though partial graft resorption occurred in some patients. Overall, this experience with AlloDerm for nasal augmentation was encouraging.     

Simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision: is there a problem with the blood supply of the nasal tip and columellar skin?

In a prospective study, 15 consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision were included to investigate whether there is a problem with the blood supply of the nasal tip and columellar skin. During the surgical procedure in these patients, there was transection of the columellar arteries and external nasal arteries, and frequently of the alar branches of the angular artery. Yet, none of the patients had any evidence of ischemia of the nasal tip or columellar skin, and there was primary wound healing with a thin-line transcolumellar scar in all patients. Techniques to avoid injury to the lateral nasal artery and nasal tip plexus are discussed. It was concluded that simultaneous open rhinoplasty and alar base excision is safe as long as certain surgical principles are applied.     

The role of the columellar strut in rhinoplasty: indications and rationale

There are a variety of techniques that can be used to enhance or improve the nasal tip. These techniques often use suture techniques and invisible grafts to achieve the desired result. The former methods have been well described throughout the literature. Among the latter techniques, the columellar strut remains a popular and effective form of an invisible graft in rhinoplasty. The purpose of this article is to define the role of the columellar strut graft, describe how to perform it correctly in rhinoplasty, provide a clinical algorithm for its application, and detail a 15-year retrospective analysis of the senior author's (R.J.R.) experience. Previous references to the importance of the columellar strut graft in rhinoplasty have been described; however, none has formally defined its singular importance in both primary and secondary open rhinoplasty. This article details the role of the columellar strut and its relationship to nasal tip projection and lower lateral cartilage symmetry with an explanation of methods for improving each. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.     

The "iatrogenic-hanging columella": preserving columellar contour after tip retroprojection

This article discusses a method for treating the ultraprojecting tip by the resection of columellar skin in open rhinoplasty. Lack of postoperative contraction of columellar skin and soft tissue may result in an "iatrogenic-hanging columella." Columellar skin resection frequently produces its own deformities because of a discrepancy in the width of the columellar base side and the infralobular flap side. The ultraprojecting tip was present in 56 of 660 consecutive rhinoplasty patients (8 percent) over 8 years (1991 to 1998). Of these 56 patients, 48 underwent partial resection of the infralobular skin flap. Of these 48 patients, eight (17 percent) required secondary skin revision of the columellar resection area. The technique was then modified since 1998. Over 2 years, 13 of 129 consecutive rhinoplasty patients (10 percent) were judged to have an ultraprojecting tip. Of these, eight patients were treated with a modification in the technique by resecting skin on the posterior columellar base. No resection areas were revised in the second series. Of the 789 patients in both series, 647 (82 percent) underwent primary rhinoplasties, 126 (16 percent) had secondary rhinoplasties, and 16 (2 percent) had tertiary rhinoplasties. The treatment of excess columella skin adds a subtle aesthetic improvement to the postoperative nasal contour. By resecting skin on the posterior columellar base or the posterior columellar base and, rarely, the anterior flap, an iatrogenic-hanging columella can be avoided.     

Supratip deformity: a closer look

Supratip deformity, a hallmark of a poorly executed rhinoplasty or an inauspicious healing, continues to plague the novice often and the experts on occasion. A clinical and histopathologic study was conducted to search for the surgical causes of this deformity and its histologic presentation. An organized, logical management program was then developed. Clinically, supratip fullness was observed in both primary (26 of 298 patients; 9 percent) and secondary (40 of 112 patients; 36 percent) rhinoplasty candidates. In primary patients, the deformity was the result of inadequate tip projection (pseudodeformity), an overprojected caudal dorsum, a combination of both, or cephalically oriented lower lateral cartilages. In secondary patients, the deformity was caused by an underresected or overresected caudal dorsum, overresected midvault, underprojected tip (pseudodeformity), or a combination of some of these factors. The histopathologic evaluation demonstrated significant fibrosis in the supratip soft tissue of 14 of 16 patients undergoing secondary rhinoplasty without the injection of triamcinolone acetonide and in only 13 of 23 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty (p<0.05). A supratip deformity can be eschewed by proper resection of the caudal dorsum, avoidance of dead space, restoration of adequate projection to the nasal tip, and an approximation of the supratip subcutaneous tissue to the underlying cartilage using a supratip suture, hence eliminating the dead space. If the problem is noted shortly after surgery, in the presence of collapsible consistency of the supratip tissue and adequate projection, the treatment is taping the supratip tissue as often as it is practical. If no favorable response is elicited in 6 to 8 weeks, thejudicious injection of a small amount of triamcinolone acetonide (0.2 to 0.4 cc of 20 mg/cc) in the deep subcutaneous tissue (not in the dermis) is done. The injection is repeated in 4-week intervals until the desired effect is achieved. If supratip fullness is the consequence of inadequate cartilage resection or inadequate tip projection, surgical correction is needed. The recalcitrant soft-tissue excess in the supratip area is resected, and the subcutaneous soft tissue is approximated to the underlying cartilage. If the dorsum was previously overresected, a cartilage graft to the caudal dorsum or midvault will create an optimal dorsal frame and reduce the potential for a recurrent supratip deformity.     

History of total nasal reconstruction with particular emphasis on the folded forehead flap technique

The history of plastic surgery is identified throughout the centuries with the history of rhinoplasty. The Indian Koomas first and later the Italian surgeons found valid solutions to the problems caused by partial loss of the nasal pyramid. However, the idea of rebuilding, with a single forehead flap, the tip and columella and providing at the same time a lining of skin for the newly formed nose goes back to the middle of the nineteenth century. The Italian Natale Petrali (1842) and the Germans Johann Friedrich Dieffenbach (1845) and Ernst Blasius (1848) contend for precedence in carrying out this important procedure still used today, which, barring postoperative contracture, represented a great advance in successful total rhinoplasty.     

Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches

Open rhinoplasty has unquestionably become more popular during the past two decades because of the putative diagnostic and technical advantages that direct transcolumellar access offers. To test the hypothesis that patients initially treated by the opened or closed approaches differed in the secondary deformities that developed, a retrospective study was conducted of 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients (66 women and 34 men) operated on by the author before February of 1998. Sixty-four percent had previously undergone closed rhinoplasties and 36 had undergone open rhinoplasties; the incidence of prior open rhinoplasty had increased steadily over the survey years, from 21 percent in 1996 to more than 50 percent in 1998, 1999, and 2000 (p < 0.05). The data generated indicate the following. First, the open rhinoplasty patients had undergone more operations (3.1 versus 1.2) and had more presenting complaints (5.8 versus 2.6) than the closed rhinoplasty patients. Second, although the most common presenting complaint among prior closed rhinoplasty patients was an overresected dorsum (50 percent) or tip (33 percent) or internal valvular obstruction (42 percent), prior open rhinoplasty patients complained more frequently than the closed rhinoplasty patients of these problems and also external valvular obstruction (50 percent, p < 0.0001), short nose (39 percent, p < 0.001), wide columella (36 percent, p < 0.001), narrow nose (31 percent, p < 0.001), columellar scar (25 percent, p < 0.001), and symptomatic columellar struts (19 percent, p < 0.001). Only excessive nasal length was more prevalent among closed rhinoplasty patients (20 percent, p < 0.01). Third, ranking of deformities differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between the two groups, so that complaints related to the nostrils, nasal tip, nasal length, or columella were more common among the open rhinoplasty patients than among those previously treated endonasally. Fourth, the relative frequencies of surgical complaints also differed: whereas patients previously treated endonasally were 6.7 times more likely to complain of long noses, patients previously treated by open rhinoplasty complained more frequently of the following: excessive columellar width (open approach, 36 percent of patients; closed approach, none), hard columellar struts (open approach, 19 percent of patients; closed approach, none), external valvular obstruction (4.5 times as frequent with the open approach as it was with the closed approach), alar/nostril distortion (four times as frequent), and narrow nose (3.9 times). Although the most common complaints among all postrhinoplasty patients remain the overresected dorsum, tip, or (internal valvular) airway obstruction, the author's data suggest that patients previously treated by the open approach are more likely to have postsurgical deformities and complaints referable to those anatomic structures most easily reached by transcolumellar exposure and to techniques that can be performed more readily or aggressively through that access route.     

Segmental bone and cartilage reconstruction of major nasal dorsal defects

This article describes the results of segmental bone and cartilage reconstruction of significant nasal dorsal defects. Solid bone graft reconstructions frequently lead to an unnatural hardness of the nasal tip. Rib cartilage reconstructions are pliable and soft but are a problem because they easily undergo warpage. The operation is performed using the open approach. Outer cranial bone graft is used for the bone component and extends at least two-thirds of the length of the dorsum. It is secured in place with a compression screw and a Kirschner wire. The cartilage component consists of an abbreviated L strut constructed of septal or conchal cartilage. It is slotted into the cranial bone in a tongue-in-groove manner and is sutured to it through a drill hole in the bone. The dorsal profile is completed with a single cartilage onlay graft or multiple sagittal cartilage grafts secured to the sides of the L strut. Twelve patients underwent segmental reconstruction of nasal deformities. Within this group, five patients underwent secondary rhinoplasty, five underwent posttraumatic rhinoplasty, and two underwent nose augmentation for Oriental features. There were seven men and five women. In all cases, good nasal tip mobility was maintained, and the nasal tips were soft. The interface between the bone graft and cartilage graftwas well camouflaged. The two did not separate. This procedure follows the principle of replacing lost tissue with like materials.     

Open rhinoplasty without skin-columella incision

For the last 4 years, the author has been using the open lower cartilaginous vault rhinoplasty, making an external cutaneous incision on the columella. After observing the improved results in patients with nasal tip, lateral crura, and medial crura difficulties, the author widely recommends the use of this procedure in selected patients. In addition to multiple advantages which have been reported useful in open-tip rhinoplasty in the past, the author has contributed two additional advantages: that it avoids scarring columella skin and that it can be extended to cope with defects of the entire lower cartilaginous vault. Disadvantages are some residual edema in some patients over a 6-months period and prolongation of operating time.     

Extended incision in open-approach rhinoplasty for asians

The purpose of this study was to introduce an extended incision in open-approach rhinoplasty for obtaining greater satisfaction in aesthetic rhinoplasty for Asians. This incision is the same as for the usual open rhinoplasty incision, but it is extended along the caudal border of the footplates of the medial crura onto the floor of the nasal vestibule to access the footplates of the medial crura more easily. This simple extended incision enabled the authors to achieve further tip projection because the pressure of the skin flap on the tip was reduced. By approximating the lateral curves of the medial crural footplates, the width and the length of the columella were narrowed and lengthened, respectively. The columella was also advanced caudally; thus, the shape of the nostrils could also be elongated. In addition, a cartilage graft or an implant insertion for alar base augmentation could be performed through this extended incision without an additional incision. Another advantage was that in correction of caudal septal deviation, displaced septal cartilage could be repositioned by suturing to the periosteum or soft tissue around the anterior nasal spine without drilling into it through an intraoral incision. Fifty-one consecutive patients who underwent this extended open-approach rhinoplasty between August of 1999 and September of 2000 were included in this study. A total of 40 patients had an adequate follow-up time of over 6 months. Patient satisfaction and postoperative complications were recorded. The majority of the patients (35 of 40) were satisfied with the results of the procedure. Two patients had complications of nostril-scar contracture requiring close follow-up. There were no cases of implant extrusion, displacement, or infection. No patients experienced transcolumellar or extended-incision scarring. Although further studies and longer follow-up are needed to determine the value of this incision, the authors believe that the addition of the extended incision in open-approach rhinoplasty is safe and reliable for effecting better results for Asians.     

Nasal tip sutures part I: the evolution

Suture techniques for reshaping the nasal tip have been in use for many decades. However, the past two decades have been the most influential in the advancement of the procedures commonly used today. This report details the origin of the major tip suture techniques and tracks their evolution through the years. The early techniques in tip rhinoplasty share a basic principle: the sacrifice of lateral crus integrity to augment the middle and medial crural cartilage to gain tip projection and height. These techniques often disrupt the support mechanisms of the tip lobule, leading to undesirable postoperative results, including supratip fullness, tip asymmetry, tip drop, and an overoperated appearance. Modern nasal tip surgery is founded on the philosophy that suture placement does not simply secure partially excised sections of alar cartilage; rather it aims to directly reshape and reposition the various nasal tip components. The principal suturing methods available in the repertoire of today's rhinoplasty surgeon are the medial crural suture, the middle crura suture, the interdomal suture, the transdomal suture, the lateral crura suture, the medial crura anchor suture, the tip rotation suture, the medial crura footplate suture, and the lateral crura convexity control suture. This report acknowledges past contributions to nasal tip surgery and looks at the recent evolution of techniques commonly used today.     

Secondary rhinoplasty using flying-bird and vestibular tornado incisions for unilateral cleft lip patients

To correct the nasal deformity in cleft lip patients, a new procedure of open rhinoplasty using a "flying-bird" incision in the nostril tip with a vestibule "tornado"-shaped incision in the cleft side is presented. The newly designed vestibular incision produces effective vestibular advancement with the freed lower lateral cartilage. The flying-bird incision makes it possible to produce a suitable nostril tip appearance with symmetrical external nostril vestibules. If the vestibular defect after flap advancement is wide, a full-thickness skin graft is used to give priority for making a good external nostril shape. This procedure is useful for most cleft lip noses, particularly in cases of moderate to severe deformity.     

Sonography of nasal tip anatomy and surgical tip refinement

The amorphous or wide nasal tip is the most commonly encountered nasal tip deformity, but little has been done to measure the effect of standard rhinoplasty techniques on nasal tip width. In the clinical routine, nasal tip width and soft-tissue cover thickness are estimated by inspection and palpation rather than by measurement. In this study, a B-mode sonograph with a 12-MHz transducer was used in a noncontact mode to measure tip width 0.5 cm occipital to the tip defining point, distance between the alar cartilage domes, and thickness of the soft-tissue cover overlying the lower lateral cartilages. These parameters were measured 3 to 8 weeks before and 56 days to 19 months after a transdomal suture tip plasty in 18 patients. The distance between the alar cartilage domes seemed to be an important factor for tip width because interdomal distance, not soft-tissue cover thickness, correlated with tip width before surgery (correlation: 0.53). Conversely, the degree of tip refinement correlated with preoperative soft-tissue cover thickness (correlation: 0.75), but not with interdomal distance. Ultrasonic imaging of nasal soft tissues may help to assess the effect of different tip refining procedures and other soft-tissue changes after rhinoplasty.     

The nasal tip: cartilage repositioning

Two hundred and forty patients who underwent a corrective rhinoplasty have been presented. Of these, 224 patients (93.3 percent) had a cartilage repositioning procedure in which the alar cartilages were only undermined and repositioned, and 16 patients (6.7 percent) had a cartilage resection procedure. The techniques and indications for both procedures are described and discussed. The results obtained in this series of patients indicate that cartilage repositioning is an effective and reliable procedure to refine and reshape the nasal tip. Cartilage resection is less reliable and should be reserved for a few selected patients with specific indications. Indiscriminate resection of the lower alar cartilage is neither warranted nor wise.