Alternating translocation of protein substrates from both ends of ClpXP protease

In ClpXP protease complexes, hexameric rings of the ATP-dependent ClpX chaperone stack on one or both faces of the double-heptameric rings of ClpP. We used electron microscopy to record the initial binding of protein substrates to ClpXP and their accumulation inside proteolytically inactive ClpP. Proteins with N- or C-terminal recognition motifs bound to complexes at the distal surface of ClpX and, upon addition of ATP, were translocated to ClpP. With a partially translocated substrate, the non-translocated portion remained on the surface of ClpX, aligned with the central axis of the complex, confirming that translocation proceeds through the axial channel of ClpXP. Starting with substrate bound on both ends, most complexes translocated substrate from only one end, and rarely (<5%) from both ends. We propose that translocation from one side is favored for two reasons: initiation of translocation is infrequent, making the probability of simultaneous initiation low; and, further, the presence of protein within the cis side translocation channel or within ClpP generates an inhibitory signal blocking translocation from the trans side.     

Binding and degradation of heterodimeric substrates by ClpAP and ClpXP

ClpA and ClpX function both as molecular chaperones and as the regulatory components of ClpAP and ClpXP proteases, respectively. ClpA and ClpX bind substrate proteins through specific recognition signals, catalyze ATP-dependent protein unfolding of the substrate, and when in complexes with ClpP translocate the unfolded polypeptide into the cavity of the ClpP peptidase for degradation. To examine the mechanism of interaction of ClpAP with dimeric substrates, single round binding and degradation experiments were performed, revealing that ClpAP degraded both subunits of a RepA homodimer in one cycle of binding. Furthermore, ClpAP was able to degrade both protomers of a RepA heterodimer in which only one subunit contained the ClpA recognition signal. In contrast, ClpXP degraded both subunits of a dimeric substrate only when both protomers contained a recognition signal. These data suggest that ClpAP and ClpXP may recognize and bind substrates in significantly different ways.     

Functional proteolytic complexes of the human mitochondrial ATP-dependent protease, hClpXP

Human mitochondrial ClpP (hClpP) and ClpX (hClpX) were separately cloned, and the expressed proteins were purified. Electron microscopy confirmed that hClpP forms heptameric rings and that hClpX forms a hexameric ring. Complexes of a double heptameric ring of hClpP with hexameric hClpX rings bound on each side are stable in the presence of ATP or adenosine 5'-(3-thiotriphosphate) (ATPgammaS), indicating that a symmetry mismatch is a universal feature of Clp proteases. hClpXP displays both ATP-dependent proteolytic activity and ATP- or ATPgammaS-dependent peptidase activity. hClpXP cannot degrade lambdaO protein or GFP-SsrA, specific protein substrates recognized by Escherichia coli (e) ClpXP. However, eClpX interacts with hClpP, and, when examined by electron microscopy, the resulting heterologous complexes are indistinguishable from homologous eClpXP complexes. The hybrid eClpX-hClpP complexes degrade eClpX-specific protein substrates. In contrast, eClpA can neither associate with nor activate hClpP. hClpP has an extra C-terminal extension of 28 amino acids. A mutant lacking this C-terminal extension interacts more tightly with both hClpX and eClpX and shows enhanced enzymatic activities but still does not interact with eClpA. Our results establish that human ClpX and ClpP constitute a bone fide ATP-dependent protease and confirm that substrate selection, which differs between human and E. coli ClpX, is dependent solely on the Clp ATPase. Our data also indicate that human ClpP has conserved sites required for interaction with eClpX but not eClpA, implying that the modes of interaction with ClpP may not be identical for ClpA and ClpX.     

Control of Substrate Gating and Translocation into ClpP by Channel Residues and ClpX Binding

ClpP is a self-compartmentalized protease, which has very limited degradation activity unless it associates with ClpX to form ClpXP or with ClpA to form ClpAP. Here, we show that ClpX binding stimulates ClpP cleavage of peptides larger than a few amino acids and enhances ClpP active-site modification. Stimulation requires ATP binding but not hydrolysis by ClpX. The magnitude of this enhancement correlates with increasing molecular weight of the molecule entering ClpP. Amino-acid substitutions in the channel loop or helix A of ClpP enhance entry of larger substrates into the free enzyme, eliminate ClpX binding in some cases, and are not further stimulated by ClpX binding in other instances. These results support a model in which the channel residues of free ClpP exclude efficient entry of all but the smallest peptides into the degradation chamber, with ClpX binding serving to relieve these inhibitory interactions. Specific ClpP channel variants also prevent ClpXP translocation of certain amino-acid sequences, suggesting that the wild-type channel plays an important role in facilitating broad translocation specificity. In combination with previous studies, our results indicate that collaboration between ClpP and its partner ATPases opens a gate that functions to exclude larger substrates from isolated ClpP.     

ClpP: a structurally dynamic protease regulated by AAA+ proteins

Proteolysis is an important process for many aspects of bacterial physiology. Clp proteases carry out a large proportion of protein degradation in bacteria. These enzymes assemble in complexes that combine the protease ClpP and the unfoldase, ClpA or ClpX. ClpP oligomerizes as two stacked heptameric rings enclosing a central chamber containing the proteolytic sites. ClpX and ClpA assemble into hexameric rings that bind both axial surfaces of the ClpP tetradecamer forming a barrel-like complex. ClpP requires association with ClpA or ClpX to unfold and thread protein substrates through the axial pore into the inner chamber where degradation occurs. A gating mechanism regulated by the ATPase exists at the entry of the ClpP axial pore and involves the N-terminal regions of the ClpP protomers. These gating motifs are located at the axial regions of the tetradecamer but in most crystal structures they are not visible. We also lack structural information about the ClpAP or ClpXP complexes. Therefore, the structural details of how the axial gate in ClpP is regulated by the ATPases are unknown. Here, we review our current understanding of the conformational changes that ClpA or ClpX induce in ClpP to open the axial gate and increase substrate accessibility into the degradation chamber. Most of this knowledge comes from the recent crystal structures of ClpP in complex with acyldepsipeptides (ADEP) antibiotics. These small molecules are providing new insights into the gating mechanism of this protease because they imitate the interaction of ClpA/ClpX with ClpP and activate its protease activity.     

Concurrent chaperone and protease activities of ClpAP and the requirement for the N-terminal ClpA ATP binding site for chaperone activity.

ClpA, a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family of ATPases, is both an ATP-dependent molecular chaperone and the regulatory component of ClpAP protease. We demonstrate that chaperone and protease activities occur concurrently in ClpAP complexes during a single round of RepA binding to ClpAP and ATP-dependent release. This result was substantiated with a ClpA mutant, ClpA(K220V), carrying an amino acid substitution in the N-terminal ATP binding site. ClpA(K220V) is unable to activate RepA, but the presence of ClpP or chemically inactivated ClpP restores its ability to activate RepA. The presence of ClpP simultaneously facilitates degradation of RepA. ClpP must remain bound to ClpA(K220V) for these effects, indicating that both chaperone and proteolytic activities of the mutant complex occur concurrently. ClpA(K220V) itself is able to form stable complexes with RepA in the presence of a poorly hydrolyzed ATP analog, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate), and to release RepA upon exchange of adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) with ATP. However, the released RepA is inactive in DNA binding, indicating that the N-terminal ATP binding site is essential for the chaperone activity of ClpA. Taken together, these results suggest that substrates bound to the complex of the proteolytic and ATPase components can be partitioned between release/reactivation and translocation/degradation.     

An intrinsic degradation tag on the ClpA C-terminus regulates the balance of ClpAP complexes with different substrate specificity

ATP-dependent protein degradation in bacteria is carried out by barrel-shaped proteases architecturally related to the proteasome. In Escherichia coli, ClpP interacts with two alternative ATPases, ClpA or ClpX, to form active protease complexes. ClpAP and ClpXP show different but overlapping substrate specificities. ClpXP is considered the primary recipient of ssrA-tagged substrates while ClpAP in complex with ClpS processes N-end rule substrates. Notably, in its free form, but not in complex with ClpS, ClpAP also degrades ssrA-tagged substrates and its own chaperone component, ClpA. To reveal the mechanism of ClpAP-mediated ClpA degradation, termed autodegradation, and its possible role in regulating ClpAP levels, we dissected ClpA to show that the flexible C-terminus of the second AAA module serves as the degradation signal. We demonstrate that ClpA becomes largely resistant to autodegradation in the absence of its C-terminus and, conversely, transfer of the last 11 residues of ClpA to the C-terminus of green fluorescent protein (GFP) renders GFP a substrate of ClpAP. This autodegradation tag bears similarity to the ssrA-tag in its degradation behavior, displaying similar catalytic turnover rates when coupled to GFP but a twofold lower apparent affinity constant compared to ssrA-tagged GFP. We show that, in analogy to the prevention of ssrA-mediated recognition, the adaptor ClpS inhibits autodegradation by a specificity switch as opposed to direct masking of the degradation signal. Our results demonstrate that in the presence of ssrA-tagged substrates, ClpA autodegradation will be competitively reduced. This simple mechanism allows for dynamic reallocation of free ClpAP versus ClpAPS in response to the presence of ssrA-tagged substrates.     

The ClpP double ring tetradecameric protease exhibits plastic ring-ring interactions, and the N termini of its subunits form flexible loops that are essential for ClpXP and ClpAP complex formation

ClpP is a conserved serine-protease with two heptameric rings that enclose a large chamber containing the protease active sites. Each ClpP subunit can be divided into a handle region, which mediates ring-ring interactions, and a head domain. ClpP associates with the hexameric ATPases ClpX and ClpA, which can unfold and translocate substrate proteins through the ClpP axial pores into the protease lumen for degradation. We have determined the x-ray structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae ClpP(A153P) at 2.5 A resolution. The structure revealed two novel features of ClpP which are essential for ClpXP and ClpAP functional activities. First, the Ala --> Pro mutation disrupts the handle region, resulting in an altered ring-ring dimerization interface, which, in conjunction with biochemical data, demonstrates the unusual plasticity of this region. Second, the structure shows the existence of a flexible N-terminal loop in each ClpP subunit. The loops line the axial pores in the ClpP tetradecamer and then protrude from the protease apical surface. The sequence of the N-terminal loop is highly conserved in ClpP across all kingdoms of life. These loops are essential determinants for complex formation between ClpP and ClpX/ClpA. Mutation of several amino acid residues in this loop or the truncation of the loop impairs ClpXP and ClpAP complex formation and prevents the coupling between ClpX/ClpA and ClpP activities.     

Cytoplasmic degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins

Degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins is a central feature of protein-quality control in all bacteria. In Escherichia coli, the ATP-dependent ClpXP and ClpAP proteases are thought to participate in this process, but their relative contributions to degradation of ssrA-tagged proteins in vivo have been uncertain because two adaptor proteins, ClpS and SspB, can modulate proteolysis of these substrates. Here, intracellular levels of these protease components and adaptors were determined during exponential growth and as cells entered early stationary phase. Levels of ClpA and ClpP increased about threefold during this transition, whereas ClpX, ClpS and SspB levels remained nearly constant. Using GFP-ssrA expressed from the chromosome as a degradation reporter, the effects of altered concentrations of different protease components or adaptor proteins were explored. Both ClpXP and ClpAP degraded GFP-ssrA in the cell, demonstrating that wild-type levels of SspB and ClpS do not inhibit ClpAP completely. Upon entry into stationary phase, increased levels of ClpAP resulted in increased degradation of ssrA-tagged substrates. As measured by maximum turnover rates, ClpXP degradation of GFP-ssrA in vivo was significantly more efficient than in vitro. Surprisingly, ClpX-dependent ClpP-independent degradation of GFP-ssrA was also observed. Thus, unfolding of this substrate by ClpX appears to enhance intracellular degradation by other proteases.     

The structural basis for the activation and peptide recognition of bacterial ClpP

ClpP and its ATPase compartment, ClpX or ClpA, remove misfolded proteins in cells and are of utmost importance in protein quality control. The ring hexamers of ClpA or ClpX recognize, unfold, and translocate target substrates into the degradation chamber of the double-ring tetradecamer of ClpP. The overall reaction scheme catalyzed by ClpXP or ClpAP has been proposed; however, the molecular mechanisms associated with substrate recognition and degradation have not yet been clarified in detail. To investigate these mechanisms, we determined the crystal structures of ClpP from Helicobacter pylori in complex with product peptides bound to the active site as well as in the apo state. In the complex structure, the peptides are zipped with two antiparallel strands of ClpP and point to the adjacent active site, thus providing structural explanations for the broad substrate specificity, the product inhibition and the processive degradation of substrates in the chamber. The structures also suggest that substrate binding causes local conformational changes around the active site that ultimately induce the active conformation of ClpP.     

Functional domains of the ClpA and ClpX molecular chaperones identified by limited proteolysis and deletion analysis

Escherichia coli ClpA and ClpX are ATP-dependent protein unfoldases that each interact with the protease, ClpP, to promote specific protein degradation. We have used limited proteolysis and deletion analysis to probe the conformations of ClpA and ClpX and their interactions with ClpP and substrates. ATP gamma S binding stabilized ClpA and ClpX such that that cleavage by lysylendopeptidase C occurred at only two sites. Both proteins were cleaved within in a loop preceding an alpha-helix-rich C-terminal domain. Although the loop varies in size and composition in Clp ATPases, cleavage occurred within and around a conserved triad, IG(F/L). Binding of ClpP blocked this cleavage, and prior cleavage at this site rendered both ClpA and ClpX defective in binding and activating ClpP, suggesting that this site is involved in interactions with ClpP. ClpA was also cut at a site near the junction of the two ATPase domains, whereas the second cleavage site in ClpX lay between its N-terminal and ATPase domains. ClpP did not block cleavage at these other sites. The N-terminal domain of ClpX dissociated upon cleavage, and the remaining ClpXDeltaN remained as a hexamer, associated with ClpP, and expressed ATPase, chaperone, and proteolytic activity. A truncated mutant of ClpA lacking its N-terminal 153 amino acids also formed a hexamer, associated with ClpP, and expressed these activities. We propose that the N-terminal domains of ClpX and ClpA lie on the outside ring surface of the holoenzyme complexes where they contribute to substrate binding or perform a gating function affecting substrate access to other binding sites and that a loop on the opposite face of the ATPase rings stabilizes interactions with ClpP and is involved in promoting ClpP proteolytic activity.     

The N-terminal substrate-binding domain of ClpA unfoldase is highly mobile and extends axially from the distal surface of ClpAP protease

ClpAP is a barrel-like complex consisting of hexameric rings of the ClpA ATPase stacked on the double heptameric ring of ClpP peptidase. ClpA has two AAA+ domains (Dl and D2) and a 153-residue N-domain. Substrate proteins bind to the distal surface of ClpA and are unfolded and translocated axially into ClpP. To gain insight into the functional architecture of ClpA in the ATPgammaS state, we have determined its structure at 12A resolution by cryo-electron microscopy. The resulting model has two tiers, corresponding to rings of Dl and D2 domains: oddly, there is no sign of the N-domains in the density map. However, they were detected as faint diffuse density distal to the Dl tier in a difference image between wild-type ClpAP and a mutant lacking the N-domain. This region is also accentuated in a variance map of ClpAP and in a difference imaging experiment with ClpAP complexed with ClpS, a 12kDa protein that binds to the N-domain. These observations demonstrate that the N-domains are highly mobile. From molecular modeling, we identify their median position and estimate that they undergo fluctuations of at least 30A. We discuss the implications of these observations for the role of N-domains in substrate binding: either they effect an initial transient binding, relaying substrate to a second site on the Dl tier where unfolding ensues, or they may serve as an entropic brush to clear the latter site of non-specifically bound ligands or substrates bound in non-productive complexes.     

Structural determinants stabilizing the axial channel of ClpP for substrate translocation

Acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs) antibiotics bind to Escherichia coli ClpP mimicking the interactions that the IGL/F loops in ClpA or ClpX ATPases establish with the hydrophobic pockets surrounding the axial pore of the tetradecamer that the protease forms. ADEP binding induces opening of the gates blocking the axial channel of ClpP and allowing protein substrates to be translocated and hydrolysed in the degradation chamber. To identify the structural determinants stabilizing the open conformation of the axial channel for efficient substrate translocation, we constructed ClpP variants with amino acid substitutions in the N‐terminal region that forms the axial gates. We found that adoption of a β‐hairpin loop by this region and the integrity of the hydrophobic cluster at the base of this loop are necessary elements for the axial gate to efficiently translocate protein substrates. Analysis of ClpP variants from Bacillus subtilis suggested that the identified structural requirements of the axial channel for efficient translocation are conserved between Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the activation of ClpP by ADEPs as well as the gating mechanism of the protease in the context of the ClpAP and ClpXP complexes.     

Energy-dependent degradation: Linkage between ClpX-catalyzed nucleotide hydrolysis and protein-substrate processing

ClpX requires ATP to unfold protein substrates and translocate them into the proteolytic chamber of ClpP for degradation. The steady-state parameters for hydrolysis of ATP and ATPgammaS by ClpX were measured with different protein partners and the kinetics of degradation of ssrA-tagged substrates were determined with both nucleotides. ClpX hydrolyzed ATPgammaS to ADP and thiophosphate at a rate (6/min) significantly slower than ATP hydrolysis (140/min), but the hydrolysis of both nucleotides was increased by ssrA-tagged substrates and decreased by ClpP. K(M) and k(cat) for hydrolysis of ATP and ATPgammaS were linearly correlated over a 200-fold range, suggesting that protein partners largely affect k(cat) rather than nucleotide binding, indicating that most bound ATP leaves the enzyme by hydrolysis rather than dissociation, and placing an upper limit of approximately 15 micro M on K(D) for both nucleotides. Competition studies with ClpX and fluorescently labeled ADP gave inhibition constants for ATPgammaS ( approximately 2 micro M) and ADP ( approximately 3 micro M) under the reaction conditions used for steady-state kinetics. In the absence of Mg(2+), where hydrolysis does not occur, the inhibition constant for ATP ( approximately 55 micro M) was weaker but very similar to the value for ATPgammaS ( approximately 45 micro M). Compared with ATP, ATPgammaS supported slow but roughly comparable rates of ClpXP degradation for two Arc-ssrA substrates and denatured GFP-ssrA, but not of native GFP-ssrA. These results show that the processing of protein substrates by ClpX is closely coupled to the maximum rate of nucleotide hydrolysis.     

ClpA and ClpP remain associated during multiple rounds of ATP-dependent protein degradation by ClpAP protease.

The Escherichia coli ClpA and ClpP proteins form a complex, ClpAP, that catalyzes ATP-dependent degradation of proteins. Formation of stable ClpA hexamers and stable ClpAP complexes requires binding of ATP or nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues to ClpA. To understand the order of events during substrate binding, unfolding, and degradation by ClpAP, it is essential to know the oligomeric state of the enzyme during multiple catalytic cycles. Using inactive forms of ClpA or ClpP as traps for dissociated species, we measured the rates of dissociation of ClpA hexamers or ClpAP complexes. When ATP was saturating, the rate constant for dissociation of ClpA hexamers was 0.032 min(-1) (t(1/2) of 22 min) at 37 degrees C, and dissociation of ClpP from the ClpAP complexes occurred with a rate constant of 0. 092 min(-1) (t(1/2) of 7.5 min). Because the k(cat) for casein degradation is approximately 10 min(-1), these results indicate that tens of molecules of casein can be turned over by the ClpAP complex before significant dissociation occurs. Mutations in the N-terminal ATP binding site led to faster rates of ClpA and ClpAP dissociation, whereas mutations in the C-terminal ATP binding site, which cause significant decreases in ATPase activity, led to lower rates of dissociation of ClpA and ClpAP complexes. Dissociation rates for wild-type and first domain mutants of ClpA were faster at low nucleotide concentrations. The t(1/2) for dissociation of ClpAP complexes in the presence of nonhydrolyzable analogues was >/=30 min. Thus, ATP binding stabilizes the oligomeric state of ClpA, and cycles of ATP hydrolysis affect the dynamics of oligomer interaction. However, since the k(cat) for ATP hydrolysis is approximately 140 min(-1), ClpA and the ClpAP complex remain associated during hundreds of rounds of ATP hydrolysis. Our results indicate that the ClpAP complex is the functional form of the protease and as such engages in multiple rounds of interaction with substrate proteins, degradation, and release of peptide products without dissociation.     

Turned on for degradation: ATPase-independent degradation by ClpP

Clp is a barrel-shaped hetero-oligomeric ATP-dependent protease comprising a hexameric ATPase (ClpX or ClpA) that unfolds protein substrates and translocates them into the central chamber of the tetradecameric proteolytic component (ClpP) where they are degraded processively to short peptides. Chamber access is controlled by the N-terminal 20 residues (for Escherichia coli) in ClpP that prevent entry of large polypeptides in the absence of the ATPase subunits and ATP hydrolysis. Remarkably, removal of 10–17 residues from the mature N-terminus allows processive degradation of a large model unfolded substrate to short peptides without the ATPase subunit or ATP hydrolysis; removal of 14 residues is maximal for activation. Furthermore, since the product size distribution of Δ14-ClpP is identical to ClpAP and ClpXP, the ATPases do not play an essential role in determining this distribution. Comparison of the structures of Δ14-ClpP and Δ17-ClpP with other published structures shows R15 and S16 are labile and that residue 17 can adopt a range of rotomers to ensure protection of a hydrophobic pocket formed by I19, R24 and F49 and maintain a hydrophilic character of the pore.     

Roles of the ClpX IGF loops in ClpP association,dissociation, and protein degradation

IGF‐motif loops project from the hexameric ring of ClpX and are required for docking with the self‐compartmentalized ClpP peptidase, which consists of heptameric rings stacked back‐to‐back. Here, we show that ATP or ATPγS support assembly by changing the conformation of the ClpX ring, bringing the IGF loops closer to each other and allowing efficient multivalent contacts with docking clefts on ClpP. In single‐chain ClpX pseudohexamers, deletion of one or two IGF loops modestly slows association with ClpP but strongly accelerates dissociation of ClpXP complexes. We probe how changes in the sequence and length of the IGF loops affect ClpX–ClpP interactions and show that deletion of one or two IGF loops slows ATP‐dependent proteolysis by ClpXP. We also find that ClpXP degradation is less processive when two IGF loops are deleted.     

Visualization of substrate binding and translocation by the ATP-dependent protease, ClpXP

Binding and internalization of a protein substrate by E. coli ClpXP was investigated by electron microscopy. In sideviews of ATP gamma S-stabilized ClpXP complexes, a narrow axial channel was visible in ClpX, surrounded by protrusions on its distal surface. When substrate lambda O protein was added, extra density attached to this surface. Upon addition of ATP, this density disappeared as lambda O was degraded. When ATP was added to proteolytically inactive ClpXP-lambda O complexes, the extra density transferred to the center of ClpP and remained inside ClpP after separation from ClpX. We propose that substrates of ATP-dependent proteases bind to specific sites on the distal surface of the ATPase, and are subsequently unfolded and translocated into the internal chamber of the protease.     

Communication between ClpX and ClpP during substrate processing and degradation

In the ClpXP compartmental protease, ring hexamers of the AAA(+) ClpX ATPase bind, denature and then translocate protein substrates into the degradation chamber of the double-ring ClpP(14) peptidase. A key question is the extent to which functional communication between ClpX and ClpP occurs and is regulated during substrate processing. Here, we show that ClpX-ClpP affinity varies with the protein-processing task of ClpX and with the catalytic engagement of the active sites of ClpP. Functional communication between symmetry-mismatched ClpXP rings depends on the ATPase activity of ClpX and seems to be transmitted through structural changes in its IGF loops, which contact ClpP. A conserved arginine in the sensor II helix of ClpX links the nucleotide state of ClpX to the binding of ClpP and protein substrates. A simple model explains the observed relationships between ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis and functional interactions between ClpX, protein substrates and ClpP.     

Examination of the nucleotide‐linked assembly mechanism of E. coli ClpA

Escherichia coli ClpA is a AAA+ (ATPase Associated with diverse cellular Activities) chaperone that catalyzes the ATP‐dependent unfolding and translocation of substrate proteins targeted for degradation by a protease, ClpP. ClpA hexamers associate with one or both ends of ClpP tetradecamers to form ClpAP complexes. Each ClpA protomer contains two nucleotide‐binding sites, NBD1 and NBD2, and self‐assembly into hexamers is thermodynamically linked to nucleotide binding. Despite a number of studies aimed at characterizing ClpA and ClpAP‐catalyzed substrate unfolding and degradation, respectively, to date the field is unable to quantify the concentration of ClpA hexamers available to interact with ClpP for any given nucleotide and total ClpA concentration. In this work, sedimentation velocity studies are used to quantitatively examine the self‐assembly of a ClpA Walker B variant in the presence of ATP. In addition to the hexamerization, we observe the formation of a previously unreported ClpA dodecamer in the presence of ATP. Further, we report apparent equilibrium constants for the formation of each ClpA oligomer obtained from direct boundary modeling of the sedimentation velocity data. The energetics of nucleotide binding to NBD1 and NBD2 are revealed by examining the dependence of the apparent association equilibrium constants on free nucleotide concentration.