表型可塑性与外来植物的入侵能力

外来植物的入侵能力与其性状之间的关系是入侵生态学中的基本问题之一。成功的入侵种常常能占据多样化的生境,并以广幅的环境耐受性为特征。遗传分化(包括生态型分化)和表型可塑性是广布性物种适应变化、异质性生境的两种不同但并不矛盾和排斥的策略。越来越多的实验证据表明,表型可塑性具有确定的遗传基础,本身是一种可以独立进化的性状。许多入侵种遗传多样性比较低,但同时又占据了广阔的地理分布区和多样化的生境,表型可塑性可能在这些物种的入侵成功和随后的扩散中起到了关键作用。本文首先介绍表型可塑性的含义,简述表型可塑性和生物适应的关系,然后从理论分析和实验证据两个方面论述了表型可塑性与外来植物入侵能力的相关性,最后针对进一步的研究工作进行了讨论。当然,并非所有入侵种的成功都能归因于表型可塑性,作者认为对于那些遗传多样性比较低同时又占据多样化生境的入侵种,表型可塑性和入侵能力的正相关可能是一条普遍法则,而非特例。     

喜旱莲子草对同基因型邻体根系的表型可塑性: 入侵地和原产地的比较

植物对邻体根系的表型可塑性是指与无邻体对照相比, 即使个体平均可获取土壤资源相同, 在有邻体根系存在时植物也会改变根系生物量分配, 并影响其他功能性状和适合度。表型可塑性进化假说(evolution of plasticity hypothesis)认为外来植物在入侵地进化出了更强的表型可塑性。对该假说的验证多集中于外来植物对光照、水分、养分以及天敌等的可塑性进化, 但对邻体根系的可塑性在入侵植物中是否发生进化尚未见报道。我们采用同质园实验比较了喜旱莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides)入侵地(美国)和原产地(阿根廷)各5个基因型的适合度与功能性状对同基因型邻体根系的可塑性。结果表明: 喜旱莲子草的根冠比(P = 0.088)和比叶面积(P = 0.007)对同基因型邻体根系的可塑性在入侵地和原产地基因型间存在差异: 入侵地基因型在有邻体根系时根冠比和比叶面积增加, 而原产地基因型则相反。但是, 总生物量、贮藏根生物量、比茎长和分枝强度对邻体根系的可塑性在入侵地和原产地间没有显著差异。此外, 与分隔邻体根系相比, 同基因型邻体根系存在时总生物量(+9.9%)和贮藏根生物量(+13.9%)显著增加, 比茎长(-9.5%)显著降低。最后, 与原产地基因型相比, 总体上入侵地基因型的总生物量(+62.0%)和贮藏根生物量(+58.9%)增加, 比茎长(-28.5%)和分枝强度(-42.8%)降低。这些结果表明喜旱莲子草入侵地基因型与资源利用相关功能性状(如根冠比和比叶面积)对邻体根系的可塑性方向与原产地基因型相反; 但适合度和株型相关性状(如比茎长和分枝强度)对同基因型邻体根系的可塑性与原产地没有差异。     

不同生境入侵植物北美车前繁殖器官性状变异与权衡特征

提高繁殖输出是入侵植物成功入侵的重要机制,但不同生境间繁殖器官性状变异特征尤其是性状权衡关系可能会存在差异。以入侵植物北美车前（Plantago virginica）为研究对象,采集草坪、荒地和林下3个生境的植物花序,探究花穗及花序柄的形态、生物量及其异速生长关系在不同生境间的差异性。结果表明：不同生境北美车前大部分花序形态与生物量指标存在显著差异,草坪和荒地生境花序属细长型,而林下生境则为矮壮型。北美车前繁殖器官不同性状间的异速生长关系既有保守型也有易变型,体现出不同的环境敏感性。不同生境间北美车前繁殖器官资源分配的个体大小依赖关系也存在不一致性。可见,北美车前花序性状及资源分配在不同生境间既存在一定的可塑性也具有相对保守性,这可能是其高入侵能力的重要原因。     

不同基因型羊草数量性状的可塑性及遗传分化

为了深入探讨植物对环境变化的适应机制,该文以内蒙古草原区羊草(Leymus chinensis)不同基因型为对象,在人工控制条件下,研究了羊草基因型、刈割、干旱及其交互作用对羊草11个数量性状的影响。结果显示:(1)所观测的11个性状(光系统Ⅱ光化学效率、最大净光合速率、蒸腾速率、比叶面积、相对生长速率、分蘖增长数、地上及地下生物量、叶总酚浓度、根非结构性碳水化合物总量和根冠比)受环境因素(干旱、刈割或两者交互)影响显著,表明该物种具有较强的表型可塑性;且在4种环境条件(对照、刈割、干旱、刈割干旱)下,不同基因型羊草的反应规范并不一致,其中,最大净光合速率、蒸腾速率、比叶面积、相对生长速率、叶总酚浓度和根非结构性碳水化合物总量受环境和基因型交互作用影响显著,表明这些性状的表型可塑性具有一定的遗传基础。(2)对同一环境条件下,不同基因型间的性状进行分析显示,分蘖增长数、地下生物量和根非结构性碳水化合物含量在4种环境条件下均未检测到基因型间的差异;而其余8个性状在基因型间的差异显著,表明这些性状的差异具有一定的遗传基础,其中,与生长相关的6个性状的遗传力(H~2)较高,均大于0.5,而叶总酚浓度和根冠比仅在刈割干旱条件下检测出显著差异,H~2分别为0.145和0.202。这些实验结果为理解羊草这一重要物种在内蒙古草原区的广泛分布提供了适应机制方面的数据支持,为合理预测未来气候变化对该物种的影响提供了科学依据,为合理利用和保护该物种及其生态系统提供了理论依据。     

克隆植物的表型可塑性与等级选择

表型可塑性是指生物个体生长发育过程中遭受不同环境条件作用时产生不同表型的能力。进化的发生有赖于自然选择对种群遗传可变性产生的效力以及各基因型的表型可塑性。有足够的证据说明表型可塑性的可遗传性,它实际上是进化改变的一个成分。一般通过优化模型、数量遗传模型和配子模型来研究表型可塑性的进化。植物的构型是相对固定的,并未完全抑制表型可塑性。克隆植物因其双构件性而具有更广泛的、具有重要生态适应意义的表型可塑性。构件性使克隆植物具有以分株为基本单位的等级结构,从而使克隆植物的表型选择也具有等级性。构件等级一般包含基株、克隆片段或分株系统以及分株3个典型水平。目前认为克隆植物的自然选择有两种模式,分别以等级选择模型和基因型选择模型表征。等级选择模型认为:不同的等级水平同时也是表型选择水平,环境对各水平具有作用,各水平之间也有相互作用,多重表型选择水平的净效应最终通过繁殖水平——分株传递到随后的世代中。基因型选择模型指出:克隆生长引起分株的遗传变异,并通过基株内分株间以及基株间的非随机交配引起种子库等位基因频率的改变,产生微进化。这两种选择模式均突出强调了分株水平在自然选择过程中的变异性以及在进化中的重要性,强调了克隆生长和种子繁殖对基株适合度的贡献。基因型选择模型包含等级选择模型的观点,是对等级选择模型的重要补充。克隆植物的表型可塑性表现在3个典型等级层次上,由于各层次对自然选择压力具有不同的反应,其表型变异程度一般表现出“分株层次>分株片段层次>基株层次”的等级性反应模式。很多证据表明,在构件有机体中构件具有最大的表型可塑性,植物的表型可塑性实际上是构件而非整个遗传个体的反应。这说明克隆植物的等级反应模式可能具有普适性。如果该反应模式同时还是构件等级中不同“个体”适应性可塑性反应的模式,那么可以预测:1)在克隆植物中,分株层次受到的自然选择强度也最大,并首先发生适应性可塑性变化,最终引起克隆植物微进化;2)由于较弱的有性繁殖能力,克隆植物在进化过程中的保守性可能大于非克隆植物。克隆植物等级反应模式的普适性亟待验证。     

兰州北山侧柏株高与冠幅、胸径异速生长关系的坡向差异性

植物功能性状之间的关系是其提高自身空间资源利用能力的一种生态策略,反映了植物与环境协同适应的表型可塑性机制。本文利用Arc GIS建立研究区域的数字高程模型(DEM),并提取样地坡向数据,采用标准化主轴估计(standardized major axis estimation,SMA)方法,研究了兰州市北山不同坡向人工林侧柏株高-冠幅和株高-胸径的异速生长关系。结果表明,侧柏胸径在各坡向上存在显著性差异(P0.05),株高和冠幅在东坡和西坡之间无显著性差异(P0.05);侧柏株高与冠幅的异速生长关系存在坡向差异,南坡冠幅的生长速率大于株高的生长速率,北坡冠幅的生长速率小于株高的生长速率,东坡和西坡株高、冠幅的生长速率相近;各坡向上侧柏胸径的生长速率均大于株高的生长速率,二者异速生长关系的坡向差异不明显(P0.05)。侧柏冠幅、胸径与株高异速关系在各坡向上的不同表现,反映了异质性生境中植物主要构件的投资权衡机制。     

中国东部沿海互花米草种群生活史特征的纬度变异与可塑性

互花米草(Spartina alterniflora)于20世纪70年代被引入中国,目前已在东部沿海盐沼湿地中广泛分布,成为海岸带盐沼中危害严重的入侵植物之一.为了研究互花米草在中国入侵区中的适应机制,揭示遗传分化和表型可塑性在该物种成功入侵中的作用,本研究沿纬度梯度在南起广东(22°N)、北至天津(39°N)的沿海样带上采集了10个种群的样本,通过同质园实验比较了不同纬度来源的种群在,生活史和生长特征方面是否存在遗传分化,并平行设置高低两个水位处理以比较互花米草对水位变化(不同高程生境条件)的可塑性反应.结果表明,在所研究的互花米草17个性状中有12个存在显著的种群间差异.其中,平均开花日期和相对生长率(植株高度)表现出显著的纬度梯度变异:随着纬度的升高,开花时间提前,相对生长速率(植株高度)趋于增加.同时17个性状中有9个在不同水位处理之间存在显著差异.这些结果表明,遗传分化可能是互花米草能够快速占据广阔分布区的重要原因之一,而表型可塑性可能对互花米草在小尺度上占据不同高程环境的过程有重要作用.     

植物功能性状与外来植物入侵

揭示影响外来植物入侵性的功能性状及其生态机制是入侵植物生态学的核心任务之一。本文综述了植物功能性状与外来植物入侵性的研究进展, 通过分析植物功能性状对外来植物入侵的贡献以及外来植物的不同入侵阶段对其功能性状的需求, 探讨植物功能性状与外来植物入侵的相关性及其入侵机理。迄今研究较多的影响外来植物入侵性的功能性状主要包括形态性状、生长性状、生理性状、繁殖性状、种子性状、克隆性状、表型可塑性和遗传变异等。这些功能性状对外来植物入侵的贡献随着入侵阶段的不同而变化。在传播到达阶段, 种子性状对入侵具有重要影响; 在定居建群阶段, 与植物抗逆性和适应性相关的生理性状和繁殖性状发挥主要作用; 在扩散入侵阶段, 克隆性状和影响植物竞争能力的生理性状对植物成功入侵具有重要贡献。由于植物入侵性是其功能性状和环境因素互作的结果, 且功能性状的作用随环境因素和入侵阶段不同而异, 因此, 结合外来植物入侵阶段, 并考虑功能性状与环境因子的互作, 是入侵生物学中植物功能性状研究的发展趋势。     

表型可塑性变异的生态-发育机制及其进化意义

表型可塑性赋予生物个体在不同环境条件下通过产生不同表型来维持其适合度的能力.研究结果显示多数可塑性变异的产生是基于对环境变异信号的响应、改变基因表达式样并调整发育轨迹的结果,表观遗传调控体系在基因选择性表达和可塑性变异的跨世代传递过程中发挥了重要作用.不同物种和种群对环境变化的敏感性、发生可塑性变异的能力以及可塑性反应模式不尽相同,预示着控制可塑性能力并独立于控制性状的可塑性基凶的存在,这些基因是直接响应环境信号并控制表型表达的调控基因.表型可塑性不仅是物种适应性进化的一个重要方面,也是选择进化的产物,物种的表型可塑性变异对其生态适应和进化模式有深远的影响.     

不同光照和水分条件下鬼针草属入侵种与本地种生长、光合特征及表型可塑性的比较

为探讨鬼针草属(Bidens)入侵种的入侵性,利用同质园种植实验比较了该属入侵种三叶鬼针草(Bidens pilosa)和大狼耙草(B.frondosa)与本地种金盏银盘(B.biternata)和狼耙草(B.tripartita)在光照与水分交互作用下的形态、生长、生物量分配、光合特征及其表型可塑性的差异。结果表明:入侵种的株高和生物量在低光低水条件下与本地种相似,在有利的光照和水分条件(高光高水)下显著高于本地种,相对生长速率在高光条件下均高于本地种。入侵种在高光处理下增加了对地下部分的资源投入,在低光处理下增加了对叶的投入,且低光低水条件下比叶面积显著高于本地种。这些特性可能提高了入侵种对资源的捕获和利用能力,使其既能耐受不利的环境,又能在有利的条件下表现最大化。入侵种和本地种的形态、生长和光合生理等参数对水分变化的可塑性指数均较小,对光照变化的可塑性指数均较大。入侵种的多数变量对光照响应的可塑性指数大于本地种,较大的表型可塑性可能促进其成功入侵。另外,入侵种和本地种的光合生理参数无显著差异。相对于光合特征,形态、生长、生物量分配和表型可塑性等可能对鬼针草属入侵种的入侵性更为重要。     

PATTERNS OF THRESHOLD EVOLUTION IN POLYPHENIC INSECTS UNDER DIFFERENT DEVELOPMENTAL MODELS

Two hypotheses address the evolution of polyphenic traits in insects. Under the developmental reprogramming model, individuals exceeding a threshold follow a different developmental pathway from individuals below the threshold. This decoupling is thought to free selection to independently hone alternative morphologies, increasing phenotypic plasticity and morphological diversity. Under the alternative model, extreme positive allometry explains the existence of alternative phenotypes and divergent phenotypes are developmentally coupled by a continuous reaction norm, such that selection on either morph acts on both. We test the hypothesis that continuous reaction norm polyphenisms, evolve through changes in the allometric parameters of even the smallest males with minimal trait expression, whereas threshold polyphenisms evolve independent of the allometric parameters of individuals below the threshold. We compare two polyphenic species; the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus, whose allometry has been modeled both as a threshold polyphenism and a continuous reaction norm and the earwig Forficula auricularia , whose allometry is best modeled with a discontinuous threshold. We find that across populations of both species, variation in forceps or horn allometry in minor males are correlated to the population's threshold. These findings suggest that regardless of developmental mode, alternative morphs do not evolve independently of one another.     

Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants

Allocation is one of the central concepts in modern ecology, providing the basis for different strategies. Allocation in plants has been conceptualized as a proportional or ratio-driven process (‘partitioning’). In this view, a plant has a given amount of resources at any point in time and it allocates these resources to different structures. But many plant ecological processes are better understood in terms of growth and size than in terms of time. In an allometric perspective, allocation is seen as a size-dependent process: allometry is the quantitative relationship between growth and allocation. Therefore most questions of allocation should be posed allometrically, not as ratios or proportions. Plants evolve allometric patterns in response to numerous selection pressures and constraints, and these patterns explain many behaviours of plant populations.

In the allometric view, plasticity in allocation can be understood as a change in a plant's allometric trajectory in response to the environment. Some allocation patterns show relatively fixed allometric trajectories, varying in different environments primarily in the speed at which the trajectory is travelled, whereas other allocation patterns show great flexibility in their behaviour at a given size. Because plant growth is often indeterminate and its rate highly influenced by environmental conditions, ‘plasticity in size’ is not a meaningful concept. We need a new way to classify, describe and analyze plant allocation and plasticity because the concepts ‘trait’ and ‘plasticity’ are too broad. Three degrees of plasticity can be distinguished: (1) allometric growth (‘apparent plasticity’), (2) modular proliferation and local physiological adaptation, and (3) integrated plastic responses. Plasticity, which has evolved because it increases individual fitness, can be a disadvantage in plant production systems, where we want to optimize population, not individual, performance.     

Geometric morphometrics and leaf phenotypic plasticity: assessing fluctuating asymmetry and allometry in European white oaks (Quercus)

Because plants are unable to move away from unfavourable habitats and environmental perturbations, leaf phenotypic plasticity facilitates light absorption and gas exchange. Oaks (Quercus spp.) are particularly known for their adaptability and plastic phenotypes, and leaf allometry and developmental instability may represent important mechanisms for their adaptation to environments and evolution. Because of its important role in the adaptation of plant populations to different environments, allometry can be involved in diversifying selection. Developmental instability is related to environmental perturbations and stresses by producing random deviations in structures characterized by bilateral symmetry, such as oak leaves. In addition, developmental instability can also arise from genetic bottlenecks or as a result of hybridization. The splitting of symmetric and asymmetric components of variation and their separate analysis allows the variability in leaf shape traits to be summarized, reducing the variation produced by developmental instability. The geometric morphometric approach is a useful method for the study of leaf asymmetry and allometric patterns. This method provides an important tool for the visualization of shape attributes that characterize species with highly variable leaf phenotypic patterns. In this study, leaf shape and size variability of three white oak species was investigated by means of a two‐dimensional landmark‐based method providing improved knowledge of variance partitioning, species discrimination, fluctuating asymmetry and allometric patterns of variation resulting from the different analyses. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 179 , 335–348.     

Invasive plants do not display greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non‐invasive counterparts: a meta‐analysis

Phenotypic plasticity is commonly considered as a trait associated with invasiveness in alien plants because it may enhance the ability of plants to occupy a wide range of environments. Although the evidence of greater phenotypic plasticity in invasive plants is considerable, it is not yet conclusive. We used a meta‐analysis approach to evaluate whether invasive plant species show greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non‐invasive counterparts. The outcome of such interspecific comparisons may be biased when phylogenetic relatedness is not taken into account. Consequently, species pairs belonged to the same genus, tribe or family. The meta‐analysis included 93 records from 35 studies reporting plastic responses to light, nutrients, water, CO₂, herbivory and support availability. Contrary to what is often assumed, overall, phenotypic plasticity was similar between invasive plants and native or non‐invasive closely related species. The same result was found when separate analyses were conducted for trait plasticity to nutrients, light and water availability. Thus, invasive plant species and their native or non‐invasive counterparts are equally capable of displaying functional responses to environmental heterogeneity. The colonization of a wide range of environments by invasive plants could be due to their capacity to undergo adaptive ecotypic differentiation rather than to their ability to display plastic responses. Alternatively, phenotypic plasticity might play a role in plant invasion, but only during the initial phases, when tolerance of the novel environment is essential for plant survival. Afterwards, once alien plants are identified as invaders, the magnitude of phenotypic plasticity might be reduced after selection of the optimum phenotypes in each habitat. The identification of plant traits that consistently predict invasiveness might be a futile task because different traits favor invasiveness in different environments. Approaches at the local scale, focusing on the ecology of specific invasive plants, could be more fruitful than global macro‐analyses.     

Phenotypic plasticity: Eco-Devo and evolution

Phenotypic plasticity refers to the ability of an organism to alter its physiology/morphology/behavior in response to changes in environmental conditions. Although encompassing various phenomena spanning multi-ple levels of organization, most plastic responses seem to take place by altering gene expression and eventually altering ontogenetic trajectory in response to environmental variation. Epigenetic modifications provide a plausi-ble link between the environment and alterations in gene expression, and the alterations in phenotype based on environmentally induced epigenetic modifications can be inherited transgenerationally. Even closely related species and populations with different genotypes may exhibit differences in the patterns and the extents of plastic responses, indicating the wide existence of plasticity genes which are independent of trait means and directly respond to environmental stimuli by triggering phenotypic changes. The ability of plasticity is not only able to affect the adaptive evolution of species significantly, but is also an outcome of evolutionary processes. Therefore, phenotypic plasticity is a potentially important molder of adaptation and evolution.     

np2QTL: networking phenotypic plasticity quantitative trait loci across heterogeneous environments

Despite its critical importance to our understanding of plant growth and adaptation, the question of how environment‐induced plastic response is affected genetically remains elusive. Previous studies have shown that the reaction norm of an organism across environmental index obeys the allometrical scaling law of part‐whole relationships. The implementation of this phenomenon into functional mapping can characterize how quantitative trait loci (QTLs) modulate the phenotypic plasticity of complex traits to heterogeneous environments. Here, we assemble functional mapping and allometry theory through Lokta?Volterra ordinary differential equations (LVODE) into an R‐based computing platform, np²QTL, aimed to map and visualize phenotypic plasticity QTLs. Based on LVODE parameters, np²QTL constructs a bidirectional, signed and weighted network of QTL?QTL epistasis, whose emergent properties reflect the ecological mechanisms for genotype?environment interactions over any range of environmental change. The utility of np²QTL was validated by comprehending the genetic architecture of phenotypic plasticity via the reanalysis of published plant height data involving 3502 recombinant inbred lines of maize planted in multiple discrete environments. np²QTL also provides a tool for constructing a predictive model of phenotypic responses in extreme environments relative to the median environment.     

Phenotypic plasticity and specialization in clonal versus non-clonal plants: A data synthesis

Reproductive strategies can be associated with ecological specialization and generalization. Clonal plants produce lineages adapted to the maternal habitat that can lead to specialization. However, clonal plants frequently display high phenotypic plasticity (e.g. clonal foraging for resources), factors linked to ecological generalization. Alternately, sexual reproduction can be associated with generalization via increasing genetic variation or specialization through rapid adaptive evolution. Moreover, specializing to high or low quality habitats can determine how phenotypic plasticity is expressed in plants. The specialization hypothesis predicts that specialization to good environments results in high performance trait plasticity and specialization to bad environments results in low performance trait plasticity. The interplay between reproductive strategies, phenotypic plasticity, and ecological specialization is important for understanding how plants adapt to variable environments. However, we currently have a poor understanding of these relationships. In this study, we addressed following questions: 1) Is there a relationship between phenotypic plasticity, specialization, and reproductive strategies in plants? 2) Do good habitat specialists express greater performance trait plasticity than bad habitat specialists? We searched the literature for studies examining plasticity for performance traits and functional traits in clonal and non-clonal plant species from different habitat types. We found that non-clonal (obligate sexual) plants expressed greater performance trait plasticity and functional trait plasticity than clonal plants. That is, non-clonal plants exhibited a specialist strategy where they perform well only in a limited range of habitats. Clonal plants expressed less performance loss across habitats and a more generalist strategy. In addition, specialization to good habitats did not result in greater performance trait plasticity. This result was contrary to the predictions of the specialization hypothesis. Overall, reproductive strategies are associated with ecological specialization or generalization through phenotypic plasticity. While specialization is common in plant populations, the evolution of specialization does not control the nature of phenotypic plasticity as predicted under the specialization hypothesis.     

Allometric influence on phenotypic variation in the Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia)

Song Sparrow ( Melospiza melodia ) populations found along the Pacific Coast of North America, from Baja California to the islands off the coast of Alaska, exhibit extensive morphological variation. With a multivariate analysis of size and shape, I describe a portion of this pattern and examine how it could be maintained despite gene flow among the populations. Because shape differences fall along geographic barriers, I suggest that similarities among Song Sparrow populations in multivariate shape reflect their pattern of genetic relatedness. A general pattern of Song Sparrow post-nestling growth allometry has been discovered: bill characteristics are positively allometric and all other characteristics are negatively allometric. In contrast to shape, multivariate patterns of body size variation do not correspond to geographic relationships. In combination with evidence of Song Sparrow phenotypic plasticity, it is proposed that multivariate body size is an environmentally plastic trait and that specific traits exhibit levels of phenotypic plasticity in proportion to their rate of growth with respect to body size. In this way local environmental factors which alter body size may change an entire suite of allometrically related traits and thus create striking patterns of morphological variation.     

Characterization,costs, cues and future perspectives of phenotypic plasticity

BackgroundPlastic responses of plants to the environment are ubiquitous. Phenotypic plasticity occurs in many forms and at many biological scales, and its adaptive value depends on the specific environment and interactions with other plant traits and organisms. Even though plasticity is the norm rather than the exception, its complex nature has been a challenge in characterizing the expression of plasticity, its adaptive value for fitness and the environmental cues that regulate its expression.ScopeThis review discusses the characterization and costs of plasticity and approaches, considerations, and promising research directions in studying plasticity. Phenotypic plasticity is genetically controlled and heritable; however, little is known about how organisms perceive, interpret and respond to environmental cues, and the genes and pathways associated with plasticity. Not every genotype is plastic for every trait, and plasticity is not infinite, suggesting trade-offs, costs and limits to expression of plasticity. The timing, specificity and duration of plasticity are critical to their adaptive value for plant fitness.ConclusionsThere are many research opportunities to advance our understanding of plant phenotypic plasticity. New methodology and technological breakthroughs enable the study of phenotypic responses across biological scales and in multiple environments. Understanding the mechanisms of plasticity and how the expression of specific phenotypes influences fitness in many environmental ranges would benefit many areas of plant science ranging from basic research to applied breeding for crop improvement.