The "reduced" latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap

This report introduces a new device among latissimus dorsi flaps: the "reduced" latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. This flap consists of a proximal musculocutaneous unit and a distal, thin fasciocutaneous unit (the "reduced" portion). The former unit carries a reliable blood supply from the thoracodorsal artery and is able to cover deeper recipient defects, while the latter provides a well-contoured reconstruction of the defect. If needed, an extended portion and/or a thin cutaneous flap can be carried along with the flap according to the defect. In our clinic, we have so far used four pedicled and one free reduced latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap in the repair of a variety of defects. All flaps survived, and satisfactory contour of the recipient site was achieved in each case. These clinical experiences clarify that a reduced portion 10 cm in length can be safely carried, and it is suggested that survival of this flap does not depend on its width-to-length ratio.     

Chest-wall reconstruction by contralateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap

Reconstruction of chest wall and axilla are performed in 11 patients using a contralateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. The entire lattisimus dorsi muscle, including the fascial portion, safely carried an island of skin from the area of the lumbodorsal fascia to the contralateral axilla. The flap was transposed to the defect through a tunnel between the pectoralis major and minor muscles. Most patients who needed reconstruction of the chest wall and axilla had compromised ipsilateral vasculature that prohibited its use in a pedicled flap but had an intact contralateral chest wall, axilla, and thoracodorsal vessels. Therefore, this procedure was performed easily in comparison with a free flap or pedicled omental flap. This is a new, valuable application for the versatile latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.     

Extensive and complex defects of the scalp, middle third of the face, and palate: the role of microsurgical reconstruction

Twenty-one patients with gigantic defects of the scalp and middle third of the face and palate following excision of neglected or recurrent tumors, burns, and infections have undergone microsurgical reconstruction. Wide resection of the middle third of the face, orbit, and palate requires "complex" three-dimensional volume reconstruction, whereas extensive defects of the scalp and skull (exceeding 80 cm2) require coverage of the larger surface area soft-tissue defect and the exposed brain and dura. The latissimus dorsi free-muscle flap and split-thickness skin graft have become our methods of choice for extensive scalp and skull defects. The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous free flap is preferable for reconstruction of complex palatal and external skin and orbital defects of the middle third of the face. Microsurgical free-tissue transfer reliably frees the oncologic surgeon from the constraints imposed by conventional reconstructive techniques and may therefore allow improved curative or at least palliative resection of these extensive tumors.     

Delayed breast reconstruction with a pedicled contralateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap.

Use of the pedicled contralateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap is a safe and valuable option in delayed breast reconstruction. This flap also can create an anterior axillary fold by including fat from the lumbosacral fascia.     

Reconstruction of heel and sole defects by free flaps

One latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and five radial forearm flaps were used in reconstruction of weight-bearing parts of the heel and sole, the follow-up period being 7 to 38 months. Additional injuries such as forefoot amputations or amputations of the other leg were present in four patients. There was no flap loss. The latissimus dorsi flap proved to be too bulky and showed recurrent ulcerations, several reoperations were necessary, and definite healing has not occurred. The five forearm flaps gave good results, with a walking range from 2 hours to unimpeded walking. Complications included fissuring at the edges of one large flap and a local infection which was successfully treated. Cutaneous sensation returned in all but one flap, where it was reduced preoperatively due to a meningomyelocele. The results indicate that the fasciocutaneous radial forearm flap should be taken into consideration for reconstruction of weight-bearing areas of the heel and sole. Shortcomings of this flap include an unsightly donor defect and possible hair growth on the flap.     

Breast reconstruction using the sensate latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap

The authors performed immediate breast reconstruction on four patients using a sensate latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap accompanied by neurorrhaphy during the past 6 years. In the neurorrhaphy, the lateral cutaneous branch of the dorsal primary divisions of the seventh thoracic nerve, which controls the sensation of the myocutaneous flap, was anastomosed to the lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve, which controls the sensation of the breast. The subjects consisted of four patients whose postoperative follow-up period was 14 to 29 months, with an average of 19.3 months. The control subjects consisted of 10 cases with a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap whose sensory nerve had not been reconstructed (postoperative follow-up period, 15 to 49 months; average, 26.9 months). The sensory examination included tests of touch, pain, and temperature. The innervated musculocutaneous flap sensation showed gradual recovery at about 6 months after surgery and reached the value of the normal side after about 1 year. In the control subjects, the recovery was gradual after more than 1 year and reached the value of the normal side in only some of the control subjects. On the basis of these findings, the authors consider the present technique to be useful for the recovery of sensation in immediate breast reconstruction.     

Two options for perforator flaps in the flank donor site: latissimus dorsi and thoracodorsal perforator flaps

Two types of perforators, septocutaneous and musculocutaneous, are found in the same donor site of the flank area, and two perforator flaps based on each perforator are clinically available. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish them from one another using different nomenclatures. Accordingly, the perforator flap based on a musculocutaneous perforator is named according to the name of the muscle perforated, the latissimus dorsi perforator flap, and the perforator flap based on a septocutaneous perforator, located between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles, is named according to the name of the proximal vessel, the thoracodorsal perforator flap. In this series of 42 latissimus dorsi perforator flaps, flap size ranged from 5 x 3 cm to 20 x 15 cm, and two complications were observed: a marginal necrosis in an extremely large flap (26 x 12 cm) and a failure caused by infection. The thoracodorsal perforator flap was used in 14 cases, including two cases of chimeric composition. Flap size ranged from 4.5 x 3.5 to 18 x 15 cm, with no complications. In the two patterns of perforator flap that the author used, initial temporary flap congestion was observed in five latissimus dorsi perforator flap cases and two thoracodorsal perforator flap cases, when the flap was designed as a large flap or a less reliable perforator was selected. However, the congestion was not serious enough to cause flap necrosis. Several techniques, such as T anastomosis or inclusion of an additional perforator or a small portion of muscle, are recommended to prevent the initial flap congestion, especially when an unreliable perforator is inevitably used or when a flap larger than 20 cm long is required. A small portion of the muscle was included in six cases, when an unduly large or improperly long flap was planned. All of the flaps were successful and ranged from 22 x 7 to 15 x 28 cm, except for one case of distal flap necrosis in an extraordinarily large flap measuring 34 x 10 cm. Diverse selection of the perforator flap is one of the great advantages of the flank donor site, providing it with wider availability and more versatile composition for reconstruction or resurfacing.     

The thin latissimus dorsi perforator-based free flap for resurfacing

The authors present their experience with "thin" latissimus dorsi perforator-based free flaps for resurfacing defects. Perforator-based free flaps have been used for various kinds of reconstruction by presenting important donor structures. The thin latissimus dorsi perforatorbased free flap included only the skin and superficial adipose layer to reduce its bulkiness by dissection through the superficial fascial plane. This flap was used in 12 clinical cases, without flap necrosis or other serious postoperative complications. All of the patients were examined by preoperative power Doppler ultrasound in the spectral Doppler mode to search for the most reliable perforator. This noninvasive ultrasound technique determines the exact location and course of and ensures the reliable flow of the perforators; therefore, it greatly assists microsurgeons in saving operation time and in selecting the most suitable design for perforator flap reconstruction. We used perforators that were identified several centimeters from the lateral border of the latissimus dorsi muscle. The thin flap dimensions could be safely designed for flaps measuring up to 20 cm in length and 8 cm in width for primary closure of the donor site. Generally, a long pedicle is not required for resurfacing reconstructions, where small recipient arteries in the bed are acceptable for anastomosis with pedicles. However, pedicle dissection to the proximal vessels through the latissimus dorsi muscle was required when it was necessary to match the recipient vein for anastomosis. The authors conclude that this thin latissimus dorsi perforator-based free flap has great potential for resurfacing because of its constant thickness, easy elevation with the help of power Doppler ultrasound information, and proper flap size for moderate defects caused by scar contracture release, superficial tumor ablation, and so on.     

Flow-through thin latissimus dorsi perforator flap for repair of soft-tissue defects in the legs

Flow-through thin latissimus dorsi perforator flaps were used in six cases with complicated defects of the legs. This flap has a small amount of latissimus dorsi muscle with a considerable amount of fatty tissue removed to make a thin flap. In addition, the flap has several branches of the subscapular vessel, which are interposed to the recipient vessels of the legs. The advantages of this thin flap are: (1) flow-through vascular reconstruction can preserve the main vessels of the damaged legs; (2) the double arterial inflows and venous drainage systems of the flap ensure safe vascularization of the flap; (3) a flow-through venous drainage system from the distal extremities can also be established to prevent congestion of the affected legs; (4) this flap is versatile (it can be either thin or large); and (5) even in emergent ischemic legs, simultaneous elevation of the flap is possible with preparation of the legs. This flow-through flap is indicated for: (1) cases with a large skin defect and obstruction of the main vessels in the leg; (2) cases with a possibility of tumor recurrence in the legs; and (3) young women or girls with a large defect in the legs, rather than the rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.     

Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap

The extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap can provide autogenous tissue replacement of breast volume without an implant. Nevertheless, experience with the extended latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction is relatively limited. In this study, the authors evaluated their experience with the extended latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction to better understand its indications, limitations, complications, and clinical outcomes. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi flaps at the authors' institution between January of 1990 and December of 2000 were reviewed. During the study period, 75 extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstructions were performed in 67 patients. Bilateral breast reconstructions were performed in eight patients, and 59 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction. There were 45 immediate and 30 delayed reconstructions. Mean patient age was 51.5 years. Mean body mass index was 31.8 kg/m2. Flap complications developed in 21 of 75 flaps (28.0 percent), and donor-site complications developed in 29 of 75 donor sites (38.7 percent). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (17.3 percent) and donor-site seroma (25.3 percent) were found to be the most common complications. There were no flap losses. Patients aged 65 years or older had higher odds of developing flap complications compared with those 45 years or younger (p = 0.03). Patients with size D reconstructed breasts had significantly higher odds of flap complications compared with those with size A or B reconstructed breasts (p = 0.05). Obesity (body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2) was associated with a 2.15-fold increase in the odds of developing donor-site complications compared with patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m2 (p = 0.01). No other studied factors had a significant relationship with flap or donor-site complications. In most patients, the extended latissimus dorsi flap alone, without an implant, can provide good to excellent autologous reconstruction of small to medium sized breasts. In selected patients, larger breasts may be reconstructed with the extended latissimus dorsi flap alone. This flap's main disadvantage is donor-site morbidity with prolonged drainage and risk of seroma. Patients who are obese are at higher risk of developing these donor-site complications. In conclusion, the extended latissimus dorsi flap is a reliable method for total autologous breast reconstruction in most patients and should be considered more often as a primary choice for breast reconstruction.     

Repair of major defects of the chest wall and spine with the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap.

The latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is a remarkably durable and versatile flap. Flap necrosis did not occur in any of our patients. One can safely carry with it skin segments as narrow as 3 cm, or as wide as 30 cm. In addition to the 5 cases presented, we have used the flap to repair axillary burn contractures, for breast reconstruction after a transverse incision, and for coverage of the upper arm and shoulder. The applications of this flap challenge the creative imagination of the surgeon and allow a simplified reconstruction, compared to other good methods. The newly described posterior advancement of a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap is suggested as the preferred method to repair meningomyelocele defects.     

The lateral thoracodorsal flap in breast reconstruction

A fasciocutaneous transposition flap, the lateral thoracodorsal flap, has been used in 114 cases of breast reconstruction. This flap is raised from the lateral and dorsal aspects of the thoracic wall at the level of the submammary crease, and the size may be varied from 12 to 22 cm in length and 6 to 12 cm in width. The lateral thoracodorsal flap is used with an implant and forms the lateral part of the reconstructed breast. A natural ptotic breast shape is achieved in a single-stage procedure. Complications such as partial necrosis and infection have occurred in 3.5 and 2.5 percent of cases, respectively. The procedure is simple and has at our unit largely replaced the use of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap in extensive postmastectomy defects. In less disfiguring defects, the lateral thoracodorsal flap has taken the place of direct implantation because the reconstructed breast obtains a more pleasing shape by augmentation of the lower lateral pole.     

Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction

A retrospective study was conducted in 75 consecutive patients requiring postmastectomy breast reconstruction over a period of 30 months. Each woman was offered one of the following four reconstructive options: free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (total number of reconstructions, n = 34); latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (with or without expander and implant, n = 14); endoscopically assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle (with expander and implant, n = 13); and application of expander and implant only (n = 12).Of those patients originally selected for retrospective study, six did not meet the short-term prognostic criteria, and concerted attempts to contact two others proved unsuccessful. The remaining 67 patients were examined for the clinically assessed aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast(s), the subjective self-assessment of patient satisfaction, and the possible development of postoperative complications. Of these patients, six required bilateral surgery, which accounts for a final sample size of 73 individual breast reconstructions. The 67 individual patients were assessed after a minimum time of 6 months postreconstruction and became the sampling units for analysis.The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap procedure was the preferred method of breast reconstruction in 34 of 73 patients (47 percent), provided that it was generally agreed that the patient could endure a prolonged operation and that there was sufficient unscarred abdominal tissue available. Thereafter, postmastectomy radiotherapy at the chest wall became the primary criterion for assignment of a patient to a particular surgical procedure. Whenever radiotherapy resulted in poor-quality skin at the chest wall, endoscopically assisted transfer of latissimus dorsi muscle flap was considered to be the optimal treatment (13 of 73 patients, or 18 percent). Body mass index and smoking were secondary factors that were taken into account when this alternative technique was being considered.In the absence of radiotherapy, and provided that the chest wall was minimally scarred, patients who were reluctant to have reconstruction with autologous tissue were treated with expander and implant only (12 of 73, or 16 percent). This third procedure is a physically less arduous ordeal for the patient and was therefore the choice for all patients for whom a prolonged operation was not a realistic option. The fourth (and final) surgical procedure, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (with or without expander and implant), was selected for all patients with a better quality of skin over the chest wall, those whose abdomen was extensively scarred, and those who were on a general surgeon's operating list to undergo immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy (14 of 73, or 19 percent).Equally good aesthetic results could be demonstrated with each of the four treatment options, provided that the reconstructive procedure selected was optimal for the individual patient and in accordance with the criteria described above. A variety of potential risk factors were considered for association with postoperative complications, including prescribed medication, obesity, smoking behavior, use of radiotherapy, and the recorded aggregated operative time. Of these, only body mass index (p < 0.001) and use of steroids (p = 0.016) were identified as having statistically significant effects on the incidence of adverse events.Finally, the general level of satisfaction expressed by the patient was highly correlated with a good appearance of the reconstructed breast, the physical comfort experienced while wearing a brassiere, and the general mobility of the unsupported reconstruction.     

Functional reconstruction of maxilla with free latissimus dorsi-scapular osteomusculocutaneous flap

Restoration of oral and nasal function together with facial appearance is still challenging in maxillary reconstruction. Use of a composite flap transfer merely to fill the defect results in unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes. The authors present a reconstructive procedure for complex maxillary defects using the latissimus dorsi-scapular rib osteomusculocutaneous flap. Some modifications for the reconstruction of the nasal cavity and the hard palate contributed to excellent postoperative functions. Five cases of extended maxillary defect were reconstructed using a novel procedure between February of 1997 and October of 2000. The hard palate was reconstructed with a vascularized scapular angle. The infraorbital rim was reconstructed with a vascularized rib if it was required. A prop bone graft, replacing the zygomatic buttress, was added between the infraorbital rim and the hard palate. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap, which was supported by a skeletal framework and obliterated the remaining cavities around the bone grafts, was left exposed into the nasal cavity, and an 8-French (no. 10) nasal airway tube was placed as a stent in the nasal meatus for 3 weeks after surgery. A skin graft was applied on the scapular angle to reconstruct the oral side of the hard palate. If required, facial skin defect was repaired with a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap or scapular flap. No major complications at the recipient or the donor sites occurred postoperatively in any of the five cases. In cases in which the eyeballs were preserved, almost normal facial appearance was obtained and an orbital extirpation case showed an acceptable postoperative appearance. All five patients returned to an unrestricted diet and their speech was assessed as normal by a speech test. Nasal breathing through the re-epithelialized meatus was possible in all cases. The reconstructed nasal cavity was maintained for more than 6 months in all cases and for more than 2 years in one early case. Rhinometry demonstrated normal function, and histologic findings of the re-epithelialized mucosa over the muscle flap in the nasal cavity revealed a nearly normal architecture. This technique simplifies the reconstructive procedure of massive maxillary defects, including those in the lateral wall of the nasal cavity. It also improves the postoperative oral and nasal functions of the patients.     

A variation of the vascular pedicle of the latissimus dorsi muscle

A case of a rare variation of the vascular pedicle of the latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap is described. Its main vascular pedicle was the circumflex scapular vessel.     

More experience with the "reverse" latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap: precise location of blood supply

Our work demonstrates that the "reverse" latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap has a predictable and consistent blood supply. A major portion of the muscle can be nourished by the dorsal perforating branches of the ninth, tenth, and eleventh intercostal vessels. The skin island based on the "reverse" latissimus dorsi muscle can be as large as 8 X 20 cm. This is confirmed by anatomic dissections and clinical cases. Knowledge of the blood supply facilitates elevation of the flap and extends its utility.     

One-stage microvascular transfer of a latissimus flap to the sacrum using vein grafts

A large irradiated wound of the lumbosacral area is covered in one stage with a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap by "extending" the vascular pedicle with 25-cm interpositional vein grafts.     

Optimizing autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients

Breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap plus an implant has been proposed as an option for women with a thin body habitus who do not have sufficient abdominal tissue to permit reconstruction with a TRAM flap alone. The standard autologous tissue reconstructive procedure in these women is a combined latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and breast implant. We reviewed our experience performing TRAM flap/implant and latissimus dorsi flap/implant breast reconstruction to compare complication rates and aesthetic outcomes between these two types of reconstruction. Between 1992 and 1999, 88 breasts were reconstructed at our institution using an autologous tissue flap combined with a breast implant (44 with a TRAM flap/implant and 44 with a latissimus dorsi flap/implant). Recipient-site and donor-site complications for the two procedures were compared using Fisher's exact test; a panel of unbiased, blinded judges compared the aesthetic outcomes. The recipient-site complication rate was lower for the TRAM flap/implant group than for the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group (18 percent versus 34 percent, p = 0.09). Most recipient-site complications in the TRAM flap/implant group were related to fluid collection around the implant. In the TRAM flap/implant group, complications occurred in 37 percent of the reconstructions that had immediate implant placement and in none of the reconstructions with delayed implant placement (p = 0.01). In the TRAM flap/implant reconstructions with immediate implant placement, the recipient-site complication rate was 50 percent when implants were completely filled with saline, but no complications occurred with incompletely filled, postoperatively adjustable implants (p = 0.03). No microvascular complications occurred with immediate placement of breast implants under TRAM flaps. Donor-site complications included a hematoma, a seroma, and an umbilical necrosis in the TRAM flap/implant group and six cases of seroma formation in the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group. The comparison of aesthetic outcome was statistically significant for the TRAM flap/implant group, which had a higher overall mean score than the latissimus dorsi flap/implant group did (3.29 versus 2.85, p = 0.01). The results of this study suggest that the TRAM flap/implant breast reconstruction should be considered as an alternative to the latissimus dorsi flap/implant breast reconstruction in women with a thin body habitus.     

Sixty latissimus dorsi flaps.

In clinical experiences with 60 cases, we have found the latissimus dorsi to be a reliable and versatile flap. We describe its use for a functional muscle transfer (in restoration of elbow flexion and repair of abdominal wall defects), for arm and shoulder coverage, for breast reconstruction, and as a free flap.     

Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: improved aesthetic results after transection of its humeral insertion.

Does transecting the tendinous insertion of the latissimus dorsi on the humerus improve aesthetic results and avoid the displeasing bulge in the armpit that sometimes occurs when the latissimus dorsi is used for breast reconstruction? In a prospective study, 60 patients who were having breast cancer surgery and simultaneous breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi flap were randomized for cutting (n = 29) or leaving intact (n = 31) the tendinous muscle insertion on the humerus. The cosmetic outcome was evaluated by patients and surgeons 6 to 12 months postoperatively. Patients reported good cosmetic results in 29 of 31 cases with the humeral insertion left intact and in 26 of 29 cases when the tendon was cut (p = 0.59), as compared with 21 of 31 cases versus 25 of 29 cases (p = 0.091), according to the surgeon's evaluation. A lateral bulge was more frequently observed by the surgeons in the group with intact insertion (10 of 31 patients), as compared with the group with a transected humeral insertion (2 of 29 patients). Discomfort caused by this bulge was reported by 19 of 31 patients with intact insertion, but only 3 of 29 patients with the tendon cut (p < 0.0001). The additional transection of the tendon was not associated with any complications. The additional transection of the tendinous humeral insertion of the latissimus dorsi muscle improves aesthetic results and avoids a displeasing bulge in the axilla when the latissimus dorsi flap is used for breast reconstruction.