Garlic for hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundIn the past decade, garlic has become one of the most popular complementary therapies for blood pressure (BP) control used by hypertensive patients. Numerous clinical studies have focused on the BP-lowering effect of garlic, but results have been inconsistent. Overall, there is a dearth of information available to guide the clinical community on the efficacy of garlic in hypertensive patients.AimTo systematically review the medical literature to investigate the current evidence of garlic for the treatment of hypertension.MethodsPubMed, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched for appropriate articles from their respective inceptions until August 2014. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials comparing garlic vs. a placebo in patients with hypertension were considered. Papers were independently reviewed by two reviewers and were analyzed using Cochrane software Revman 5.2.ResultsA total of seven randomized, placebo-controlled trials were identified. Compared with the placebo, this meta-analysis revealed a significant lowering effect of garlic on both systolic BP (WMD: −6.71 mmHg; 95% CI: −12.44 to −0.99; P = 0.02) and diastolic BP (WMD: −4.79 mmHg; 95% CI: −6.60 to −2.99; P < 0.00001). No serious adverse events were reported in any of the trials.ConclusionThe present review suggests that garlic is an effective and safe approach for hypertension. However, more rigorously designed randomized controlled trials focusing on primary endpoints with long-term follow-up are still warranted before garlic can be recommended to treat hypertensive patients.     

Effects of myo-inositol in women with PCOS: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) affects 5%-10% of women in reproductive age, and it is the most common cause of infertility due to ovarian dysfunction and menstrual irregularity. Several studies have reported that insulin resistance is common in PCOS women, regardless of the body mass index. The importance of insulin resistance in PCOS is also suggested by the fact that insulin-sensitizing compounds have been proposed as putative treatments to solve the hyperinsulinemia-induced dysfunction of ovarian response to endogenous gonadotropins. Rescuing the ovarian response to endogenous gonadotropins reduces hyperandrogenemia and re-establishes menstrual cyclicity and ovulation, increasing the chance of a spontaneous pregnancy. Among the insulin-sensitizing compounds, there is myo-inosiol (MYO). Previous studies have demonstrated that MYO is capable of restoring spontaneous ovarian activity, and consequently fertility, in most patients with PCOS. With the present review, we aim to provide an overview on the clinical outcomes of the MYO use as a treatment to improve ovarian function and metabolic and hormonal parameters in women with PCOS.     

Effects of stem cells on non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background aimsTo assess the impacts of stem cell therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The effect of stem cell therapy on prognosis is unclear and controversial.MethodsThe authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with NICM on a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and heart transplantation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) distance and serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, considering studies published before March 19, 2020.ResultsTwelve trials with 623 subjects met inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group, stem cell therapy improved LVEF (weighted mean difference [WMD], 4.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93–6.23, P = 0.0002) and 6-MWT distance (WMD, 101.49 m, 95% CI, 45.62–157.35, P = 0.0004) and reduced BNP level (–294.94 pg/mL, 95% CI, –383.97 to –205.90, P < 0.00001) and NYHA classification (–0.70, 95% CI, –0.98 to –0.43, P < 0.00001). However, LVEDD showed no significant difference between the two groups (WMD, –0.09 cm, 95% CI, –0.23 to 0.06, P = 0.25). In 10 studies (535 subjects) employing the intracoronary route for cell delivery, mortality and heart transplantation were decreased (risk ratio [RR], 0.73, 95% CI, 0.52–1.00, P = 0.05). Furthermore, in four studies (248 subjects) with peripheral CD34+ cells, either all-cause mortality (RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.23–0.86, P = 0.02) or mortality and heart transplantation (RR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.27–0.77, P = 0.003) improved in the treatment group compared with the control. The trial sequential analysis suggested the information size of LVEF, 6-WMT and BNP has been adequate for evidencing the benefits of stem cells on NICM. However, to determine the potential survival benefit, more clinical data are required to make the statistical significance in meta-analysis more conclusive.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrates that stem cell therapy may improve survival, exercise capacity and cardiac ejection fraction in NICM, which suggests that stem cells are a promising option for NICM treatment.     

Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in patients with HIV on antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review

Background

To allow for correct evaluation of clinical trial results, readers require comprehensive, clear, and highly transparent information on the methodology used and the results obtained. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of reporting in articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the field of HIV/AIDS.

Methods

We searched for original articles on RCTs of ART developed in the field of HIV/AIDS in PubMed database by 5 April 2016. Searched articles were divided into three groups based on the revision year in which the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines were published: Period 1 (1996–2001); Period 2 (2002–2010); and Period 3 (2011–2016). We evaluated the articles using the reporting rates of the 37 items in the CONSORT 2010 checklist, five items in the protocol deviation, and the three items in the ethics.

Results

Fifty-two articles were extracted and included in this study. Many of the reporting rates calculated using the CONSORT 2010 checklist showed a significantly increasing trend over the successive periods (65% in Period 1, 67% in Period 2, 79% in Period 3; p?<?0.0001). The items with reporting rates?<?50% were “the presence or absence of a protocol change and the reason for such a change,” “randomization and blinding,” and “where the full trial protocol can be accessed.” Reporting rates of deviations were as low as?<?30%, while the reporting rates for patient compliance were the highest (>80% in Period 3) among the five items. The reporting rates for obtaining informed consent and approval by the ethics committee or institutional review board were high (>88%), regardless of the time period assessed.

Conclusion

In terms of representative RCT articles in the field of HIV/AIDS, the reporting rate of the items defined by CONSORT was approximately 70%, improving over the successive CONSORT statement revision periods.

     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for unipolar depression: a systematic review of classic long-term randomized controlled trials

Background

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are increasingly used in the long-term treatment of depression. Much of the supporting evidence about the effects of these drugs comes from discontinuation trials, a variant of randomized controlled trials whose design is problematic to interpret. We conducted a systematic review to examine the efficacy and acceptability of long-term therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors relative to placebo in the treatment of unipolar depression.

Methods

We identified placebo-controlled randomized trials with a treatment duration of at least 6 months by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to update a recently published systematic review. Efficacy was defined in terms of response to treatment (50% improvement in depression score relative to baseline) and remission (score of 7 or below on the Hamilton rating scale for depression). Key secondary outcomes included quality of life, return to work, need for additional treatment and self-harm. Overall acceptability was defined in terms of dropouts for any reason over a course of treatment.

Results

Of the 2693 records identified initially, we included 6 randomized controlled trials that met our eligibility criteria. These studies had a moderate risk of bias, had assigned a total of 1299 participants with depression to either treatment or placebo and had followed both groups for 6–8 months. We observed statistically significant improvements in response to treatment (odds ratio [OR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–2.48), but not in remission (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.92–2.32) or acceptability (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.14). The effects appeared greater among patients without comorbidities.

Interpretation

There is a lack of classic randomized controlled trials of serotonin reuptake inhibitors lasting more than 1 year for the treatment of depression. The results of our systematic review support current recommendations for 6–8 months of antidepressant treatment following initial recovery but provide no guidance for longer treatment.Over the past decade, the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the management of depression has increased dramatically, and preliminary evidence suggests that long-term use, for more than 1 or 2 years, accounts for much of this rise.^1–3 Clinical practice guidelines generally recommend a 6- to 9-month course following initial recovery after a first episode of depression and longer, sometimes indefinite, therapy after subsequent episodes, to prevent relapse.^4–10Long-term randomized controlled trials of antidepressants have typically used 1 of 2 possible designs, each answering different questions (Figure 1).¹¹ The most widely used design is called the “discontinuation trial,” a 2-phase study in which all participants are initially treated with an open (unblinded) course of drug therapy. Participants attaining a certain response during the open-treatment phase enter the second phase, during which they are randomly assigned to continue active drug treatment or to receive placebo.^12–14 Discontinuation trials are believed to minimize the number of participants with depression who must be exposed to placebo. This advantage comes at a cost, since the results apply only to patients with a response to the medication, not to those who experience spontaneous recovery; furthermore, withdrawal symptoms may lead to an overestimate of the true effect of the medication. When this design is used to test long-term therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of depression, the results are difficult to interpret with confidence because rates of spontaneous recovery in depression are potentially high and because withdrawal effects can mimic depression.^13–15Open in a separate windowFigure 1: Two designs of randomized controlled trials used to investigate long-term antidepressant therapy.The second type of randomized trial used to test long-term therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is a 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial, hereafter referred to as a classic randomized controlled trial (Figure 1).¹⁶ In this type of trial, participants with acute depression are assigned to receive either placebo or active drug, and all those achieving a certain response, either to the drug or to the placebo, are followed. The advantage of classic randomized controlled trials is that data from all participants contribute to our understanding of the drug''s real-world effectiveness. Their main drawback is that a greater number of acutely ill people may have to receive placebo than in a discontinuation trial.¹³ Most classic trials of antidepressants are short-term studies. Fergusson and colleagues,¹⁷ in a systematic review examining selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and suicide, identified 702 classic trials involving a total of 18 413 participants, the majority of which (93%) lasted less than 6 months.A recent systematic review based mainly on studies with discontinuation designs showed that, in a subgroup of patients who experienced recovery while taking medications, long-term therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors reduced the chances of relapse by up to 70% for up to 36 months, relative to patients whose therapy was discontinued earlier.⁶ However, there has been no systematic review of classic randomized trials of long-term therapy with this drug class to determine the potential benefits in all patients with depression, including those with spontaneous recovery.We sought to examine the efficacy and acceptability of long-term therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors relative to placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe depression, including subgroups of patients with major chronic health conditions. We also examined a number of key indicators of the quality of evidence and its clinical importance.     

Quality of reporting of bioequivalence trials comparing generic to brand name drugs: a methodological systematic review

Background

Generic drugs are used by millions of patients for economic reasons, so their evaluation must be highly transparent.

Objective

To assess the quality of reporting of bioequivalence trials comparing generic to brand-name drugs.

Methodology/Principal Findings

PubMed was searched for reports of bioequivalence trials comparing generic to brand-name drugs between January 2005 and December 2008. Articles were included if the aim of the study was to assess the bioequivalency of generic and brand-name drugs. We excluded case studies, pharmaco-economic evaluations, and validation dosage assays of drugs. We evaluated whether important information about funding, methodology, location of trials, and participants were reported. We also assessed whether the criteria required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agency (EMA) to conclude bioequivalence were reported and that the conclusions were in agreement with the results. We identified 134 potentially relevant articles but eliminated 55 because the brand-name or generic drug status of the reference drug was unknown. Thus, we evaluated 79 articles. The funding source and location of the trial were reported in 41% and 56% of articles, respectively. The type of statistical analysis was reported in 94% of articles, but the methods to generate the randomization sequence and to conceal allocation were reported in only 15% and 5%, respectively. In total, 65 articles of single-dose trials (89%) concluded bioequivalence. Of these, 20 (31%) did not report the 3 criteria within the limits required by the FDA and 11 (17%) did not report the 2 criteria within the limits required by the EMA.

Conclusions/Significance

Important information to judge the validity and relevance of results are frequently missing in published reports of trials assessing generic drugs. The quality of reporting of such trials is in need of improvement.     

Zinc for the treatment of the common cold: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:

Results of randomized controlled trials evaluating zinc for the treatment of the common cold are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zinc for such use.

Methods:

We searched electronic databases and other sources for studies published through to Sept. 30, 2011. We included all randomized controlled trials comparing orally administered zinc with placebo or no treatment. Assessment for study inclusion, data extraction and risk-of-bias analyses were performed in duplicate. We conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model.

Results:

We included 17 trials involving a total of 2121 participants. Compared with patients given placebo, those receiving zinc had a shorter duration of cold symptoms (mean difference −1.65 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.50 to −0.81); however, heterogeneity was high (I² = 95%). Zinc shortened the duration of cold symptoms in adults (mean difference −2.63, 95% CI −3.69 to −1.58), but no significant effect was seen among children (mean difference −0.26, 95% CI −0.78 to 0.25). Heterogeneity remained high in all subgroup analyses, including by age, dose of ionized zinc and zinc formulation. The occurrence of any adverse event (risk ratio [RR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.46), bad taste (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.16) and nausea (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.27) were more common in the zinc group than in the placebo group.

Interpretation:

The results of our meta-analysis showed that oral zinc formulations may shorten the duration of symptoms of the common cold. However, large high-quality trials are needed before definitive recommendations for clinical practice can be made. Adverse effects were common and should be the point of future study, because a good safety and tolerance profile is essential when treating this generally mild illness.The common cold is a frequent respiratory infection experienced 2 to 4 times a year by adults and up to 8 to 10 times a year by children.^1–3 Colds can be caused by several viruses, of which rhinoviruses are the most common.⁴ Despite their benign nature, colds can lead to substantial morbidity, absenteeism and lost productivity.^5–7Zinc, which can inhibit rhinovirus replication and has activity against other respiratory viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus,⁸ is a potential treatment for the common cold. The exact mechanism of zinc’s activity on viruses remains uncertain. Zinc may also reduce the severity of cold symptoms by acting as an astringent on the trigeminal nerve.^9,10A recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials concluded that zinc was effective at reducing the duration and severity of common cold symptoms.¹¹ However, there was considerable heterogeneity reported for the primary outcome (I² = 93%), and subgroup analyses to explore between-study variations were not performed. The efficacy of zinc therefore remains uncertain, because it is unknown whether the variability among studies was due to methodologic diversity (i.e., risk of bias and therefore uncertainty in zinc’s efficacy) or differences in study populations or interventions (i.e., zinc dose and formulation).We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zinc for the treatment of the common cold. We sought to improve upon previous systematic reviews^11–17 by exploring the heterogeneity with subgroups identified a priori, identifying new trials by instituting a broader search and obtaining additional data from authors.     

Regional intra-arterial vs. systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) versus systemic chemotherapy for stage III/IV pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated by regional intra-arterial or systemic chemotherapy were identified using PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases, for all publications dated between 1960 and December 31, 2010. Data was independently extracted by two reviewers. Odds ratios and relative risks were pooled using either fixed- or random-effects models, depending on I² statistic and Q test assessments of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.

Results

Six randomized controlled trials comprised of 298 patients met the standards for inclusion in the meta-analysis, among 492 articles that were identified. Eight patients achieved complete remission (CR) with regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC), whereas no patients achieved CR with systemic chemotherapy. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, patients receiving RIAC had superior partial remissions (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.65; 58.06% with RIAC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), clinical benefits (RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.84, 2.97; 78.06% with RAIC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), total complication rates (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.87; 49.03% with RIAC and 71.33% with systemic treatment), and hematological side effects (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91; 60.87% with RIAC and 85.71% with systemic treatment). The median survival time with RIAC (5–21 months) was longer than for systemic chemotherapy (2.7–14 months). Similarly, one year survival rates with RIAC (28.6%−41.2%) were higher than with systemic chemotherapy (0%−12.9%.).

Conclusion

Regional intra-arterial chemotherapy is more effective and has fewer complications than systemic chemotherapy for treating advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate supplementation in health and disease: a systematic review of randomized trials

Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB), a metabolite of the branched-chain amino acid leucine, is extensively used by athletes and bodybuilders in order to increase strength, muscle mass and exercise performance. We performed a systematic review of the clinical literature on the effectiveness of HMB supplementation in healthy and pathological conditions (i.e. training programs, aging, acute and chronic diseases, and after bariatric surgery). We reviewed all clinical trials indexed in Medline that tested HMB supplementation as well as all the experimental data regarding HMB intracellular mechanisms of action. Search terms included: randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, single- and double-blind method, HMB, proteolytic pathways, muscle atrophy, cachexia, and training. We found out 13 studies testing HMB in healthy young trained subjects, 11 in healthy young untrained subjects, 9 in patients affected by chronic diseases (i.e. cancer, HIV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and 6 in elderly subjects. The indexed studies support that HMB is effective in preventing exercise-related muscle damage in healthy trained and untrained individuals as well as muscle loss during chronic diseases. Most of the selected studies showed the effectiveness of HMB in preventing exercise-related muscle damage in healthy trained and untrained individuals as well as muscle loss during chronic diseases. The usual dose of 3 g/day may be routinely recommended to maintain or improve muscle mass and function in health and disease. The safety profile of HMB is unequivocal. Further, well-designed clinical studies are needed to confirm effectiveness and mode of action of HMB, particularly in pathological conditions.     

Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review

Background

Recruitment of participants into randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is critical for successful trial conduct. Although there have been two previous systematic reviews on related topics, the results (which identified specific interventions) were inconclusive and not generalizable. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relative effectiveness of recruitment strategies for participation in RCTs.

Methods and Findings

A systematic review, using the PRISMA guideline for reporting of systematic reviews, that compared methods of recruiting individual study participants into an actual or mock RCT were included. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and reference lists of relevant studies. From over 16,000 titles or abstracts reviewed, 396 papers were retrieved and 37 studies were included, in which 18,812 of at least 59,354 people approached agreed to participate in a clinical RCT. Recruitment strategies were broadly divided into four groups: novel trial designs (eight studies), recruiter differences (eight studies), incentives (two studies), and provision of trial information (19 studies). Strategies that increased people''s awareness of the health problem being studied (e.g., an interactive computer program [relative risk (RR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–2.18], attendance at an education session [RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28], addition of a health questionnaire [RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14–1.66]), or a video about the health condition (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.11–2.74), and also monetary incentives (RR1.39, 95% CI 1.13–1.64 to RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28–1.84) improved recruitment. Increasing patients'' understanding of the trial process, recruiter differences, and various methods of randomisation and consent design did not show a difference in recruitment. Consent rates were also higher for nonblinded trial design, but differential loss to follow up between groups may jeopardise the study findings. The study''s main limitation was the necessity of modifying the search strategy with subsequent search updates because of changes in MEDLINE definitions. The abstracts of previous versions of this systematic review were published in 2002 and 2007.

Conclusion

Recruitment strategies that focus on increasing potential participants'' awareness of the health problem being studied, its potential impact on their health, and their engagement in the learning process appeared to increase recruitment to clinical studies. Further trials of recruitment strategies that target engaging participants to increase their awareness of the health problems being studied and the potential impact on their health may confirm this hypothesis. Please see later in the article for the Editors'' Summary     

Cardiovascular risk factor reporting in immune checkpoint inhibitor trials: A systematic review

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of numerous cancers but are associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction. The prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) in patients treated with ICIs is unknown. This study sought to describe the frequency of reporting of CVRFs among landmark ICI trials.MethodsA systematic review of all phase 2 or 3 cancer trials employing ICIs that led to United States Food and Drug Administration approval was conducted.ResultsOf the 69 identified trials, only one study reported baseline rates of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. Smoking history was reported in 27 studies (39 %) and three (4 %) reported body mass index. No study reported history of previous cardiovascular disease, although 17 (25 %), six (9 %), and 21 (30 %) studies excluded patients with recent myocardial infarction, revascularization and heart failure respectively. Similarly low rates of cardiovascular risk factor reporting were observed in studies employing concurrent vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and recruiting (neo)adjuvant cohorts.ConclusionThe prevalence of CVRFs is poorly described in ICI trials despite increasingly reported risks of myocardial infarction. A systematic approach to collecting and reporting CVRFs should be considered in future trials and real world populations.     

Intrathoracic infusion therapy with Lentinan and chemical irritants for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 65 randomized controlled trials

BackgroundAderivative of Shiitake mushrooms, Lentinan is used to control malignant pleural effusion (MPE) through intrathoracic infusion.PurposeTo determine the clinical response, survival and safety of Lentinan plus chemical irritants, and the optimal combinations with chemical irritants, indication, threshold and optimal regimen for achieving the desired responses.Study designWe performed a new systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines.MethodsWe collected all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding Lentinan plus chemical irritants from Chinese and English electronic databases (from inception until March 2019). We evaluated their bias risk, synthesized data using meta-analysis, and summarized evidence quality following the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.ResultsWe included 65 RCTs involving 4,080 patients and nine chemical irritants. Most trials had unclear bias risk. Lentinan with cisplatin significantly improved complete response [Risk ratio (RR) = 1.68, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.51 to 1.87), p < 0.00001, Fig.3a] and quality of life [RR = 1.51 95% CI (1.41 to 1.62), p < 0.00001, Fig.4], and decreased the risk of treatment failure, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reaction, and chest pain. For patients with moderate to large volume of the pleural effusion, primary treatment, KPS score ≥ 50–60, or anticipated survival time ≥ 3months, Lentinan (3–4 mg/time, once a week for three to four times) withcisplatin (30–40 mg/m² or 50–60 mg/m²) significantly improved complete response and decreased failure. Most results were robust and moderate quality.ConclusionThe results suggest that Lentinan with chemical irritants, especially cisplatin is beneficial to the patient with MPE, and provide evidence for the indication, threshold, and optimal regimen that may achieve success and decrease failure.