The Herpes Simplex Virus US11 Protein Effectively Compensates for the γ134.5 Gene if Present before Activation of Protein Kinase R by Precluding Its Phosphorylation and That of the α Subunit of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2

In herpes simplex virus-infected cells, viral γ₁34.5 protein blocks the shutoff of protein synthesis by activated protein kinase R (PKR) by directing the protein phosphatase 1α to dephosphorylate the α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α). The amino acid sequence of the γ₁34.5 protein which interacts with the phosphatase has high homology to a domain of the eukaryotic protein GADD34. A class of compensatory mutants characterized by a deletion which results in the juxtaposition of the α47 promoter next to U_S11, a γ₂ (late) gene in wild-type virus-infected cells, has been described. In cells infected with these mutants, protein synthesis continues even in the absence of the γ₁34.5 gene. In these cells, PKR is activated but eIF-2α is not phosphorylated, and the phosphatase is not redirected to dephosphorylate eIF-2α. We report the following: (i) in cells infected with these mutants, U_S11 protein was made early in infection; (ii) U_S11 protein bound PKR and was phosphorylated; (iii) in in vitro assays, U_S11 blocked the phosphorylation of eIF-2α by PKR activated by poly(I-C); and (iv) U_S11 was more effective if present in the reaction mixture during the activation of PKR than if added after PKR had been activated by poly(I-C). We conclude the following: (i) in cells infected with the compensatory mutants, U_S11 made early in infection binds to PKR and precludes the phosphorylation of eIF-2α, whereas U_S11 driven by its natural promoter and expressed late in infection is ineffective; and (ii) activation of PKR by double-stranded RNA is a common impediment countered by most viruses by different mechanisms. The γ₁34.5 gene is not highly conserved among herpesviruses. A likely scenario is that acquisition by a progenitor of herpes simplex virus of a portion of the cellular GADD34 gene resulted in a more potent and reliable means of curbing the effects of activated PKR. U_S11 was retained as a γ₂ gene because, like many viral proteins, it has multiple functions.The herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) genome encodes two sets of functions. The first and paramount are functions related to viral gene expression, replication of viral DNA, synthesis of virion proteins, assembly, packaging, and egress of the virus from the infected cell. The second set of functions, no less important in the survival of the virus in the human population, is creation of the environment necessary to maximize the yield and spread of virus from cell to cell and from infected to uninfected individuals (reviewed in reference 38). Of these known genes, several play a significant role in abating or delaying a host response to infection. The earliest to be expressed is the U_L41 gene which encodes a protein that is introduced into the cell in virions during infection (26, 27). This protein reduces the synthesis of host proteins by causing the destruction of mRNA in a rather nonspecific manner and therefore could be expected to reduce the synthesis of cellular proteins deleterious to viral replication (26, 27, 44).A second and very different approach to blocking host defense mechanisms is exemplified by infected cell protein 47 (ICP47). Proteosomal degradation of viral proteins could be expected to produce antigenic peptides which, if presented on the cell surface, could provoke a cytotoxic cell response early in infection and thus reduce viral yield. ICP47, an α protein made immediately after infection, blocks the presentation of antigenic peptides on the surface of the infected cells (20).The focus of this laboratory has been on a third viral pathway designed to block cellular response to infection. In cells infected with most viruses, the synthesis of complementary mRNA leads to activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR). This enzyme phosphorylates the α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2α) (23). A consequence of this phosphorylation is total shutoff of protein synthesis. This would be an example of a noble sacrifice of the infected cell for the sake of survival of the organism were it not for the fact that viruses, while activating the PKR kinase pathway by making double-stranded RNA, also express functions which block this host defense system (2–4, 6, 7, 10, 28, 30, 34). In the case of HSV-1, more than 50% of the viral DNA is represented late in infection in the form of cRNA (21, 25), and the gene whose product blocks the consequences of activation of PKR is γ₁34.5 (7). In the absence of the gene, eIF-2α is phosphorylated and protein synthesis is impaired beginning approximately 5 h after infection (7, 9). In its presence, protein synthesis continues unabated even though PKR is activated (9). Recent studies have shown that the carboxyl terminus of the γ₁34.5 gene binds to the protein phosphatase 1α (PP1) and redirects it to dephosphorylate eIF-2α (19). The effectiveness of the γ₁34.5-PP1 complex is apparent from the observation that the rate of dephosphorylation of eIF-2α in cells infected with wild-type virus is more than 1000 times that of uninfected cells or cells infected with the γ₁34.5⁻ virus (5, 19).The studies described in this report concern another aspect of virus-induced block of the consequence of activation of PKR. Briefly, Mohr and Gluzman reported that serial passage of a γ₁34.5⁻ mutant resulted in the selection of a compensatory mutation capable of sustained protein synthesis (35). A characteristic of the compensatory mutants isolated by Mohr and Gluzman is a deletion in the α47 gene resulting in the juxtaposition of the promoter of the α47 gene next to the 5′ end of U_S11, a late (γ₂) viral gene. Preliminary studies of those mutants revealed that PKR was activated in cells infected with either the wild-type parent or the γ₁34.5⁻ virus, but protein synthesis was unaffected in cells infected with wild-type virus or the mutant carrying the compensatory mutations (5, 18).In an attempt to define the phenotype of the virus carrying the compensatory mutation, we constructed a mutant lacking the γ₁34.5 and the U_S8 to -12 genes. This mutant, designated R5103, activated PKR and caused a shutoff of protein synthesis (5). We then inserted into the R5103 genome a DNA fragment consisting of the intact U_S10 gene and the U_S11 open reading frame fused to the α47 promoter. This virus, designated R5104, activated PKR but did not induce the shutoff of protein synthesis. Consistent with the conclusion of Mohr and Gluzman (35), the mutation maps in the domain inserted into the R5104 virus (5). Further studies yielded two significant observations. First, in stark contrast to lysates of cells infected with R5103 and other γ₁34.5⁻ mutants, the lysates of R5104 virus failed to phosphorylate the α subunit of eIF-2 (5). Second, in striking contrast to lysates of wild-type virus-infected cells, the phosphatase activity of lysates of R5104 virus-infected cells specific for eIF-2α could not be differentiated from that of mock-infected cells or those of cells infected with other γ₁34.5⁻ mutants (5). These results indicated that the compensatory mutation blocks PKR from phosphorylating eIF-2α.The studies summarized in this report focused on U_S11 protein. We report that in cells infected with the R5104 recombinant the U_S11 protein is made early in infection, that U_S11 protein interacts with PKR and blocks the phosphorylation of eIF-2α by activated PKR in in vitro assays, and that the effectiveness of the U_S11 protein is greater if the protein is present in the reaction before activation of PKR than if it is after PKR has been activated by the addition of poly(I-C). We also found that U_S11 is phosphorylated in the presence of activated PKR but not in its absence. We conclude that U_S11 may have been an ancient mechanism for blocking the effects of activated PKR and that it has been supplanted by acquisition of the carboxyl-terminal domain of the γ₁34.5 protein from a cellular gene. We also note that U_S11 protein made late in infection, after PKR has been activated, is ineffective.Relevant to this report are some of the properties of the U_S11 protein. U_S11 is one of the most abundant viral proteins expressed at late times in viral infection (22, 31). It binds mRNA in a sequence- and conformation-specific fashion (39–41). In HSV-1-infected cells, U_S11 suppresses the synthesis of a truncated RNA colinear with the 5′ domain of the U_L34 mRNA (40). The protein accumulates in nucleoli, in the cytoplasm in association with the 60S ribosomal subunit, and it is also packaged in virions (31, 37, 41). In newly infected cells, the U_S11 protein has been found associated with ribosomes (41).Recently a plethora of reports suggested that U_S11 may have novel functions not readily apparent from its localization in the infected cell. Thus, U_S11 protein has been reported to have functions similar to those of human immunodeficiency Tat and Rev proteins and has also been reported to complement Rev function in a Rev⁻ human immunodeficiency virus mutant (11). The U_S11 protein has been reported to confer thermotolerance and help restore protein synthesis in HeLa cells subjected to thermal injury (12).     

Phosphorylation of Serine 779 in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 and 2 by Protein Kinase C? Regulates Ras/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling and Neuronal Differentiation

The FGF receptors (FGFRs) control a multitude of cellular processes both during development and in the adult through the initiation of signaling cascades that regulate proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Although FGFR tyrosine phosphorylation and the recruitment of Src homology 2 domain proteins have been widely described, we have previously shown that FGFR is also phosphorylated on Ser⁷⁷⁹ in response to ligand and binds the 14-3-3 family of phosphoserine/threonine-binding adaptor/scaffold proteins. However, whether this receptor phosphoserine mode of signaling is able to regulate specific signaling pathways and biological responses is unclear. Using PC12 pheochromocytoma cells and primary mouse bone marrow stromal cells as models for growth factor-regulated neuronal differentiation, we show that Ser⁷⁷⁹ in the cytoplasmic domains of FGFR1 and FGFR2 is required for the sustained activation of Ras and ERK but not for other FGFR phosphotyrosine pathways. The regulation of Ras and ERK signaling by Ser⁷⁷⁹ was critical not only for neuronal differentiation but also for cell survival under limiting growth factor concentrations. PKCϵ can phosphorylate Ser⁷⁷⁹ in vitro, whereas overexpression of PKCϵ results in constitutive Ser⁷⁷⁹ phosphorylation and enhanced PC12 cell differentiation. Furthermore, siRNA knockdown of PKCϵ reduces both growth factor-induced Ser⁷⁷⁹ phosphorylation and neuronal differentiation. Our findings show that in addition to FGFR tyrosine phosphorylation, the phosphorylation of a conserved serine residue, Ser⁷⁷⁹, can quantitatively control Ras/MAPK signaling to promote specific cellular responses.     

Escherichia coli Virulence Protein NleH1 Interaction with the v-Crk Sarcoma Virus CT10 Oncogene-like Protein (CRKL) Governs NleH1 Inhibition of the Ribosomal Protein S3 (RPS3)/Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB) Pathway

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli and other attaching/effacing bacterial pathogens cause diarrhea in humans. These pathogens use a type III secretion system to inject virulence proteins (effectors) into host cells, some of which inhibit the innate immune system. The enterohemorrhagic E. coli NleH1 effector prevents the nuclear translocation of RPS3 (ribosomal protein S3) to inhibit its participation as a nuclear “specifier” of NF-κB binding to target gene promoters. NleH1 binds to RPS3 and inhibits its phosphorylation on Ser-209 by IκB kinase-β (IKKβ). However, the precise mechanism of this inhibition is unclear. NleH1 possesses a Ser/Thr protein kinase activity that is essential both for its ability to inhibit the RPS3/NF-κB pathway and for full virulence of the attaching/effacing mouse pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. However, neither RPS3 nor IKKβ is a substrate of NleH1 kinase activity. We therefore screened ∼9,000 human proteins to identify NleH1 kinase substrates and identified CRKL (v-Crk sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene-like protein), a substrate of the BCR/ABL kinase. Knockdown of CRKL abundance prevented NleH1 from inhibiting RPS3 nuclear translocation and NF-κB activity. CRKL residues Tyr-198 and Tyr-207 were required for interaction with NleH1. Lys-159, the kinase-active site of NleH1, was necessary for its interaction with CRKL. We also identified CRKL as an IKKβ interaction partner, mediated by CRKL Tyr-198. We propose that the CRKL interaction with IKKβ recruits NleH1 to the IKKβ complex, where NleH1 then inhibits the RPS3/NF-κB pathway.     

C-Nap1, a Novel Centrosomal Coiled-Coil Protein and Candidate Substrate of the Cell Cycle–regulated Protein Kinase Nek2

Nek2 (for NIMA-related kinase 2) is a mammalian cell cycle–regulated kinase structurally related to the mitotic regulator NIMA of Aspergillus nidulans. In human cells, Nek2 associates with centrosomes, and overexpression of active Nek2 has drastic consequences for centrosome structure. Here, we describe the molecular characterization of a novel human centrosomal protein, C-Nap1 (for centrosomal Nek2-associated protein 1), first identified as a Nek2-interacting protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen. Antibodies raised against recombinant C-Nap1 produced strong labeling of centrosomes by immunofluorescence, and immunoelectron microscopy revealed that C-Nap1 is associated specifically with the proximal ends of both mother and daughter centrioles. On Western blots, anti–C-Nap1 antibodies recognized a large protein (>250 kD) that was highly enriched in centrosome preparations. Sequencing of overlapping cDNAs showed that C-Nap1 has a calculated molecular mass of 281 kD and comprises extended domains of predicted coiled-coil structure. Whereas C-Nap1 was concentrated at centrosomes in all interphase cells, immunoreactivity at mitotic spindle poles was strongly diminished. Finally, the COOH-terminal domain of C-Nap1 could readily be phosphorylated by Nek2 in vitro, as well as after coexpression of the two proteins in vivo. Based on these findings, we propose a model implicating both Nek2 and C-Nap1 in the regulation of centriole–centriole cohesion during the cell cycle.The serine/threonine kinase NIMA of Aspergillus nidulans is considered the founding member of a family of protein kinases with a possible role in cell cycle regulation (for reviews see Fry and Nigg, 1995; Lu and Hunter, 1995a ; Osmani and Ye, 1996). In A. nidulans, NIMA clearly cooperates with the Cdc2 protein kinase to promote progression into mitosis (Osmani et al., 1991), and overexpression of NIMA in a variety of heterologous species promotes a premature onset of chromosome condensation (O''Connell et al., 1994; Lu and Hunter, 1995b ). This has been interpreted to suggest evolutionary conservation of a pathway involving NIMA-related kinases (for review see Lu and Hunter, 1995a ). Indeed, kinases structurally related to NIMA are present in many species (Fry and Nigg, 1997). However, the only bona fide functional homologue of NIMA so far isolated stems from another filamentous fungus, Neurospora crassa (Pu et al., 1995), and the functional relationship between vertebrate NIMA-related kinases and fungal NIMA remains uncertain.The closest known mammalian relative to NIMA is a kinase termed Nek2 (for NIMA-related kinase 2)¹ (Fry and Nigg, 1997). This kinase undergoes cell cycle–dependent changes in abundance and activity, reminiscent of NIMA (Schultz et al., 1994; Fry et al., 1995). It is highly expressed in male germ cells (Rhee and Wolgemuth, 1997; Tanaka et al., 1997), and data have been reported consistent with a role for Nek2 in meiotic chromosome condensation (Rhee and Wolgemuth, 1997). However, overexpression of active Nek2 in somatic cells has no obvious effect on chromosome condensation; instead, it induces striking alterations in the structure of the centrosome, the principal microtubule-organizing center of mammalian cells (Fry et al., 1998). Furthermore, immunofluorescence microscopy and subcellular fractionation concur to demonstrate that endogenous Nek2 associates with centrosomes, strongly suggesting that one physiological function of this kinase may relate to the centrosome cycle (Fry et al., 1998).The mammalian centrosome is an organelle of about 1 μm in diameter. It comprises two barrel-shaped centrioles that are made of nine short triplet microtubules and are surrounded by an amorphous matrix known as the pericentriolar material (PCM) (for review see Brinkley, 1985; Vorobjev and Nadehzdina, 1987; Kimble and Kuriyama, 1992; Kalt and Schliwa, 1993; Kellogg et al., 1994; Lange and Gull, 1996). Major progress has recently been made with the demonstration that microtubules are nucleated from γ-tubulin–containing ring complexes (γ-TuRCs), which are concentrated within the PCM (Moritz et al., 1995; Zheng et al., 1995). γ-Tubulin forms complexes with Spc97/98, two evolutionarily conserved proteins first identified in budding yeast spindle pole bodies (Geissler et al., 1996; Knop et al., 1997; Stearns and Winey, 1997), and there is also evidence for an important role of pericentrin and other coiled-coil proteins in organizing γ-TuRCs into higher order lattice structures (Doxsey et al., 1994; Dictenberg et al., 1998). However, in spite of this recent progress, it is clear that the inventory of centrosome components is far from complete.Centrosome structure and function is regulated in a cell cycle–dependent manner (for reviews see Mazia, 1987; Kellogg et al., 1994; Tournier and Bornens, 1994). Once in every cell cycle, and beginning around the G1/S transition, centrioles are duplicated (e.g., Kuriyama and Borisy, 1981a ; Vorobjev and Chentsov, 1982; Kochanski and Borisy, 1990; Chrétien et al., 1997). Late in G2, centrosomes then grow in size (a process referred to as maturation) through the recruitment of additional PCM proteins (Rieder and Borisy, 1982; Kalt and Schliwa, 1993; Lange and Gull, 1995). At the G2/M transition, the duplicated centrosomes separate and migrate to opposite ends of the nucleus. Concomitantly, their microtubule-nucleating activities increase dramatically in preparation for spindle formation (McGill and Brinkley, 1975; Snyder and McIntosh, 1975; Gould and Borisy, 1977; Kuriyama and Borisy, 1981b ; for reviews see Brinkley, 1985; Vorobjev and Nadehzdina, 1987; Karsenti, 1991). By what mechanisms these events are controlled remains largely unknown, but data obtained using phosphoepitope-specific antibodies strongly suggest that phosphorylation of centrosomal proteins plays a major role (Vandré et al., 1984, 1986; Centonze and Borisy, 1990). More direct support for this view stems from the observation that cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) enhance the microtubule-nucleation activity of centrosomes at the G2/M transition (Verde et al., 1990, 1992; Buendia et al., 1992) and are involved in promoting centrosome separation (Blangy et al., 1995; Sawin and Mitchison, 1995). Similarly, polo-like kinase 1, a cell cycle regulatory kinase structurally distinct from CDKs, has recently been implicated in centrosome maturation (Lane and Nigg, 1996).The precise role of Nek2 at the centrosome remains to be determined, but it is intriguing that overexpression of this kinase in human cells causes a pronounced splitting of centrosomes. This led us to propose that Nek2-dependent phosphorylation of previously unidentified proteins may cause a loss of centriole–centriole cohesion, and that this event might represent an early step in centrosome separation at the G2/M transition (Fry et al., 1998). With the aim of identifying potential substrates (or regulators) of Nek2, we have now performed a yeast two-hybrid screen, using full-length Nek2 as a bait. We report here the molecular characterization of a novel coiled-coil protein that we call C-Nap1 (for centrosomal Nek2-associated protein 1). C-Nap1 represents a core component of the mammalian centrosome and the first candidate substrate for a member of the NIMA protein kinase family to be identified.     

Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β-activated Kinase 1 (TAK1) Activation Requires Phosphorylation of Serine 412 by Protein Kinase A Catalytic Subunit α (PKACα) and X-linked Protein Kinase (PRKX)

TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) is a key kinase in mediating Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) signaling. Although TAK1 activation involves the phosphorylation of Thr-184 and Thr-187 residues at the activation loop, the molecular mechanism underlying the complete activation of TAK1 remains elusive. In this work, we show that the Thr-187 phosphorylation of TAK1 is regulated by its C-terminal coiled-coil domain-mediated dimerization in an autophosphorylation manner. Importantly, we find that TAK1 activation in mediating downstream signaling requires an additional phosphorylation at Ser-412, which is critical for TAK1 response to proinflammatory stimuli, such as TNF-α, LPS, and IL-1β. In vitro kinase and shRNA-based knockdown assays reveal that TAK1 Ser-412 phosphorylation is regulated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit α (PKACα) and X-linked protein kinase (PRKX), which is essential for proper signaling and proinflammatory cytokine induction by TLR/IL-1R activation. Morpholino-based in vivo knockdown and rescue studies show that the corresponding site Ser-391 in zebrafish TAK1 plays a conserved role in NF-κB activation. Collectively, our data unravel a previously unknown mechanism involving TAK1 phosphorylation mediated by PKACα and PRKX that contributes to innate immune signaling.     

Identification of Distinct Conformations of the Angiotensin-II Type 1 Receptor Associated with the Gq/11 Protein Pathway and the β-Arrestin Pathway Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Biased signaling represents the ability of G protein-coupled receptors to engage distinct pathways with various efficacies depending on the ligand used or on mutations in the receptor. The angiotensin-II type 1 (AT₁) receptor, a prototypical class A G protein-coupled receptor, can activate various effectors upon stimulation with the endogenous ligand angiotensin-II (AngII), including the G_q/11 protein and β-arrestins. It is believed that the activation of those two pathways can be associated with distinct conformations of the AT₁ receptor. To verify this hypothesis, microseconds of molecular dynamics simulations were computed to explore the conformational landscape sampled by the WT-AT₁ receptor, the N111G-AT₁ receptor (constitutively active and biased for the G_q/11 pathway), and the D74N-AT₁ receptor (biased for the β-arrestin1 and -2 pathways) in their apo-forms and in complex with AngII. The molecular dynamics simulations of the AngII-WT-AT₁, N111G-AT₁, and AngII-N111G-AT₁ receptors revealed specific structural rearrangements compared with the initial and ground state of the receptor. Simulations of the D74N-AT₁ receptor revealed that the mutation stabilizes the receptor in the initial ground state. The presence of AngII further stabilized the ground state of the D74N-AT₁ receptor. The biased agonist [Sar¹,Ile⁸]AngII also showed a preference for the ground state of the WT-AT₁ receptor compared with AngII. These results suggest that activation of the G_q/11 pathway is associated with a specific conformational transition stabilized by the agonist, whereas the activation of the β-arrestin pathway is linked to the stabilization of the ground state of the receptor.     

Interaction of Double-stranded RNA-dependent Protein Kinase (PKR) with the Death Receptor Signaling Pathway in Amyloid �� (A��)-treated Cells and in APPSLPS1 Knock-in Mice

For 10 years, research has focused on signaling pathways controlling translation to explain neuronal death in Alzheimer Disease (AD). Previous studies demonstrated in different cellular and animal models and AD patients that translation is down-regulated by the activation of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR). Among downstream factors of PKR, the Fas-associated protein with a death domain (FADD) and subsequent activated caspase-8 are responsible for PKR-induced apoptosis in recombinant virus-infected cells. However, no studies have reported the role of PKR in death receptor signaling in AD. The aim of this project is to determine physical and functional interactions of PKR with FADD in amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) neurotoxicity and in APP_SLPS1 KI transgenic mice. In SH-SY5Y cells, results showed that Aβ42 induced a large increase in phosphorylated PKR and FADD levels and a physical interaction between PKR and FADD in the nucleus, also observed in the cortex of APP_SLPS1 KI mice. However, PKR gene silencing or treatment with a specific PKR inhibitor significantly prevented the increase in pT⁴⁵¹-PKR and pS¹⁹⁴-FADD levels in SH-SY5Y nuclei and completely inhibited activities of caspase-3 and -8. The contribution of PKR in neurodegeneration through the death receptor signaling pathway may support the development of therapeutics targeting PKR to limit neuronal death in AD.     

Urotensin-II Receptor Stimulation of Cardiac L-type Ca2+ Channels Requires the βγ Subunits of Gi/o-protein and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-dependent Protein Kinase C β1 Isoform

Recent studies have demonstrated that urotensin-II (U-II) plays important roles in cardiovascular actions including cardiac positive inotropic effects and increasing cardiac output. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects of U-II in cardiomyocytes still remain unknown. We show by electrophysiological studies that U-II dose-dependently potentiates L-type Ca²⁺ currents (I_Ca,L) in adult rat ventricular myocytes. This effect was U-II receptor (U-IIR)-dependent and was associated with a depolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation. Intracellular application of guanosine-5′-O-(2-thiodiphosphate) and pertussis toxin pretreatment both abolished the stimulatory effects of U-II. Dialysis of cells with the QEHA peptide, but not scrambled peptide SKEE, blocked the U-II-induced response. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor wortmannin as well as the class I PI3K antagonist {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"CH132799","term_id":"45009640","term_text":"CH132799"}}CH132799 blocked the U-II-induced I_Ca,L response. Protein kinase C antagonists calphostin C and chelerythrine chloride as well as dialysis of cells with 1,2bis(2aminophenoxy)ethaneN,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid abolished the U-II-induced responses, whereas PKCα inhibition or PKA blockade had no effect. Exposure of ventricular myocytes to U-II markedly increased membrane PKCβ₁ expression, whereas inhibition of PKCβ₁ pharmacologically or by shRNA targeting abolished the U-II-induced I_Ca,L response. Functionally, we observed a significant increase in the amplitude of sarcomere shortening induced by U-II; blockade of U-IIR as well as PKCβ inhibition abolished this effect, whereas Bay K8644 mimicked the U-II response. Taken together, our results indicate that U-II potentiates I_Ca,L through the βγ subunits of G_i/o-protein and downstream activation of the class I PI3K-dependent PKCβ₁ isoform. This occurred via the activation of U-IIR and contributes to the positive inotropic effect on cardiomyocytes.     

Nonclassical Transpeptidases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Alter Cell Size,Morphology, the Cytosolic Matrix,Protein Localization,Virulence, and Resistance to β-Lactams

Virtually all bacteria possess a peptidoglycan layer that is essential for their growth and survival. The β-lactams, the most widely used class of antibiotics in human history, inhibit d,d-transpeptidases, which catalyze the final step in peptidoglycan biosynthesis. The existence of a second class of transpeptidases, the l,d-transpeptidases, was recently reported. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an infectious pathogen that causes tuberculosis (TB), is known to possess as many as five proteins with l,d-transpeptidase activity. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate that loss of l,d-transpeptidases 1 and 2 of M. tuberculosis (Ldt_Mt1 and Ldt_Mt2) alters cell surface morphology, shape, size, organization of the intracellular matrix, sorting of some low-molecular-weight proteins that are targeted to the membrane or secreted, cellular physiology, growth, virulence, and resistance of M. tuberculosis to amoxicillin-clavulanate and vancomycin.     

Diversification of the Microtubule System in the Early Stage of Eukaryote Evolution: Elongation Factor 1α and α-Tubulin Protein Phylogeny of Termite Symbiotic Oxymonad and Hypermastigote Protists

The symbiotic protists of the lower termite have been regarded as a model of early-branched eukaryotes because of their simple cellular systems and morphological features. However, cultivation of these symbiotic protists is very difficult. For this reason, these interesting protists have not been well characterized in terms of their molecular biology. In research on these organisms which have not yet been cultivated, we developed a method for retrieving specific genes from a small number of cells, through micromanipulation without axenic cultivation, and we obtained EF-1 alpha and alpha-tubulin genes from members of the Hypermastigida--the parabasalid protist Trichonympha agilis and the oxymonad protists Pyrsonympha grandis and Dinenympha exilis--from the termite Reticulitermes speratus gut community. Results of phylogenetic analysis of the amino acid sequences of both proteins, EF-1 alpha and alpha-tubulin, indicate that the hypermastigid, parabasalid, and oxymonad protists do not share a close common ancestor. In addition, although the EF-1 alpha phylogeny indicates that these two groups of protists branched at an early stage of eukaryotic evolution, the alpha-tubulin phylogeny indicates that these protists can be assigned to two diversified clades. As shown in a recent investigation of alpha-tubulin phylogeny, eukaryotic organisms can be divided into three classes: an animal--parabasalids clade, a plant--protists clade, and the diplomonads. In this study, we show that parabasalids, including hypermastigids, can be classified as belonging to the animal--parabasalids clade and the early-branching eukaryote oxymonads can be classified as belonging to the plant--protists clade. Our findings suggest that these protists have a cellular microtubule system that has diverged considerably, and it seems that such divergence of the microtubule system occurred in the earliest stage of eukaryotic evolution.     

Small G Proteins Rac1 and Ras Regulate Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatase 5 (PP5)·Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK) Complexes Involved in the Feedback Regulation of Raf1

Serine/threonine protein phosphatase 5 (PP5, PPP5C) is known to interact with the chaperonin heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and is involved in the regulation of multiple cellular signaling cascades that control diverse cellular processes, such as cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, motility, and apoptosis. Here, we identify PP5 in stable complexes with extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). Studies using mutant proteins reveal that the formation of PP5·ERK1 and PP5·ERK2 complexes partially depends on HSP90 binding to PP5 but does not require PP5 or ERK1/2 activity. However, PP5 and ERK activity regulates the phosphorylation state of Raf1 kinase, an upstream activator of ERK signaling. Whereas expression of constitutively active Rac1 promotes the assembly of PP5·ERK1/2 complexes, acute activation of ERK1/2 fails to influence the phosphatase-kinase interaction. Introduction of oncogenic HRas (HRas^V12) has no effect on PP5-ERK1 binding but selectively decreases the interaction of PP5 with ERK2, in a manner that is independent of PP5 and MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK) activity, yet paradoxically requires ERK2 activity. Additional studies conducted with oncogenic variants of KRas4B reveal that KRas^L61, but not KRas^V12, also decreases the PP5-ERK2 interaction. The expression of wild type HRas or KRas proteins fails to reduce PP5-ERK2 binding, indicating that the effect is specific to HRas^V12 and KRas^L61 gain-of-function mutations. These findings reveal a novel, differential responsiveness of PP5-ERK1 and PP5-ERK2 interactions to select oncogenic Ras variants and also support a role for PP5·ERK complexes in regulating the feedback phosphorylation of PP5-associated Raf1.