Synthesis and Molecular Modeling of Novel HSV1 Uracil-DNA Glycosylase Inhibitors

Abstract

In a recent paper the first selective inhibitors of HSV1 uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) acting in the micromolar range have been reported ¹. A 28.5 kDa catalytic fragment of HSV1 UDG has been crystallized in the presence of uracil, and the structure was recently solved². Starting with the optimized model of binding between 6-(4′-n-octylanilino)uracil (octAU) and UDG some new derivatives have been predicted to be active. In vitro studies with the novel synthetized compounds confirm the plausibility of the model and define the structure features for UDG inhibitors.     

A kinetic analysis of substrate recognition by uracil-DNA glycosylase from herpes simplex virus type 1

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is responsible for the removal of uracil from DNA. It has previously been demonstrated that UDG exhibits some sequence dependence in its activity, although this has not been well characterised. This study has investigated the sequence-dependent activity of UDG from herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1). A more detailed analysis has been possible by using both kinetic and binding assays with a variety of different oligonucleotide substrates. The target uracil has been placed in substrates with either A-T-rich or G-C-rich flanking sequences and analyses have been performed on both the single- and double-stranded forms of each substrate. In the latter the uracil has been placed in both a U·A base pair and a U·G mismatch. It is observed that the sequences flanking the target uracil have a greater effect on UDG activity than the partner base of the uracil. Furthermore, the sequence context effects extend to single-stranded DNA. Systematic examination of the kinetics and binding of UDG with these different substrates has enabled us to examine the origin of the sequence preferences. We conclude that the damage recognition step in the HSV-1 UDG reaction pathway is modulated by local DNA sequence.     

Real-time monitoring of uracil removal by uracil-DNA glycosylase using fluorescent resonance energy transfer probes

As a highly conserved damage repair protein, uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) mainly catalyzes the excision of uracil from DNA to sustain the genome integrity. Here a novel method for monitoring the uracil removal in real time is introduced. Double-stranded DNA probes modified with uracil residues that can occur in fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) were used as substrates and detecting probes in a homogeneous solution. This method not only overcame the drawbacks of traditional radioactive assays, such as discontinuity and being time-consuming and complicated, but also was used to accurately determine the kinetic constant of UDG. The limit of detection of UDG was 0.033 U/ml. The KM and Kcat were 0.11 microM and 4 s(-1), respectively. In addition, the method was applied to investigate the influence of chemical drugs on UDG activity. The results showed that 10 mM fluorouracil (5-FU) and gentamicin are inhibitors to UDG. The in vitro detection of UDG in A549 cells showed that the activity of UDG was four times greater after the cells were treated with cisplatin. These results showed that this method can monitor uracil removal in real time and conveniently assay UDG activity with ultrasensitivity and excellent specificity in the homogeneous solution. This method is also amenable to high-throughput drug screening in vitro.     

Characterization of Bacillus subtilis uracil-DNA glycosylase and its inhibition by phage φ29 protein p56

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is a conserved DNA repair enzyme involved in uracil excision from DNA. Here, we report the biochemical characterization of UDG encoded by Bacillus subtilis, a model low G+C Gram-positive organism. The purified enzyme removes uracil preferentially from single-stranded DNA over double-stranded DNA, exhibiting higher preference for U:G than U:A mismatches. Furthermore, we have identified key amino acids necessary for B. subtilis UDG activity. Our results showed that Asp-65 and His-187 are catalytic residues involved in glycosidic bond cleavage, whereas Phe-78 would participate in DNA recognition. Recently, it has been reported that B. subtilis phage φ29 encodes an inhibitor of the UDG enzyme, named protein p56, whose role has been proposed to ensure an efficient viral DNA replication, preventing the deleterious effect caused by UDG when it eliminates uracils present in the φ29 genome. In this work, we also show that a φ29-related phage, GA-1, encodes a p56-like protein with UDG inhibition activity. In addition, mutagenesis analysis revealed that residue Phe-191 of B. subtilis UDG is critical for the interaction with φ29 and GA-1 p56 proteins, suggesting that both proteins have similar mechanism of inhibition.     

Crystal structure of a family 4 uracil-DNA glycosylase from Thermus thermophilus HB8

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG; EC 3.2.2.-) removes uracil from DNA to initiate DNA base excision repair. Since hydrolytic deamination of cytosine to uracil is one of the most frequent DNA-damaging events in all cells, UDG is an essential enzyme for maintaining the integrity of genomic information. For the first time, we report the crystal structure of a family 4 UDG from Thermus thermophilus HB8 (TthUDG) complexed with uracil, solved at 1.5 angstroms resolution. As opposed to UDG enzymes in its other families, TthUDG possesses a [4Fe-4S] cluster. This iron-sulfur cluster, which is distant from the active site, interacts with loop structures and has been suggested to be unessential to the activity but necessary for stabilizing the loop structures. In addition to the iron-sulfur cluster, salt-bridges and ion pairs on the molecular surface and the presence of proline on loops and turns is thought to contribute to the enzyme's thermostability. Despite very low levels of sequence identity with Escherichia coli and human UDGs (family 1) and E.coli G:T/U mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase (MUG) (family 2), the topology and order of secondary structures of TthUDG are similar to those of these distant relatives. Furthermore, the coordinates of the core structure formed by beta-strands are almost the same. Positive charge is distributed over the active-site groove, where TthUDG would bind DNA strands, as do UDG enzymes in other families. TthUDG recognizes uracil specifically in the same manner as does human UDG (family 1), rather than guanine in the complementary strand DNA, as does E.coli MUG (family 2). These results suggest that the mechanism by which family 4 UDGs remove uracils from DNA is similar to that of family 1 enzymes.     

Selective inhibition of herpes simplex virus type-1 uracil-DNA glycosylase by designed substrate analogs

Cytosine deamination and the misincorporation of 2'-dUrd into DNA during replication result in the presence of uracil in DNA. Uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDGs) initiate the excision repair of this aberrant base by catalyzing the hydrolysis of the N-glycosidic bond. UDGs are expressed by nearly all known organisms, including some viruses, in which the functional role of the UDG protein remains unresolved. This issue could in principle be addressed by the availability of designed synthetic inhibitors that target the viral UDG without affecting the endogenous human UDG. Here, we report that double-stranded and single-stranded oligonucleotides incorporating either of two dUrd analogs tightly bind and inhibit the activity of herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) UDG. Both inhibitors are exquisitely specific for the HSV-1 UDG over the human UDG. These inhibitors should prove useful in structural studies aimed at understanding substrate recognition and catalysis by UDGs, as well as in elucidating the biologic role of UDGs in the life cycle of herpesviruses.     

Uracil incorporation into genomic DNA does not predict toxicity caused by chemotherapeutic inhibition of thymidylate synthase

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target of several chemotherapeutic agents, including 5-FU and raltitrexed (Tomudex). During TS inhibition, TTP levels decrease with a subsequent increase in dUTP. Uracil incorporated into the genome is removed by base excision repair (BER). Thus, BER initiated by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) activity has been hypothesized to influence the toxicity induced by TS inhibitors. In this study we created a human cell line expressing the Ugi protein inhibitor of UNG family of UDGs, which reduces cellular UDG activity by at least 45-fold. Genomic uracil incorporation was directly measured by mass spectrometry following treatment with TS inhibitors. Genomic uracil levels were increased over 4-fold following TS inhibition in the Ugi-expressing cells, but did not detectably increase in UNG proficient cells. Despite the difference in genomic uracil levels, there was no difference in toxicity between the UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells to folate or nucleotide-based inhibitors of TS. Cell cycle analysis showed that UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells arrested in early S-phase and resumed replication progression during recovery from RTX treatment almost identically. The induction of gamma-H2AX was measured following TS inhibition as a measure of whether uracil excision promoted DNA double strand break formation during S-phase arrest. Although gamma-H2AX was detectable following TS inhibition, there was no difference between UNG proficient and UNG-inhibited cells. We therefore conclude that uracil excision initiated by UNG does not adequately explain the toxicity caused by TS inhibition in this model.     

Insights from xanthine and uracil DNA glycosylase activities of bacterial and human SMUG1: switching SMUG1 to UDG

Single-strand-selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase (SMUG1) belongs to Family 3 of the uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) superfamily. Here, we report that a bacterial SMUG1 ortholog in Geobacter metallireducens (Gme) and the human SMUG1 enzyme are not only UDGs but also xanthine DNA glycosylases (XDGs). In addition, mutational analysis and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of Gme SMUG1 identify important structural determinants in conserved motifs 1 and 2 for XDG and UDG activities. Mutations at M57 (M57L) and H210 (H210G, H210M, and H210N), both of which are involved in interactions with the C2 carbonyl oxygen in uracil or xanthine, cause substantial reductions in XDG and UDG activities. Increased selectivity is achieved in the A214R mutant of Gme SMUG1, which corresponds to a position involved in base flipping. This mutation results in an activity profile resembling a human SMUG1-like enzyme as exemplified by the retention of UDG activity on mismatched base pairs and weak XDG activity. MD simulations indicate that M57L increases the flexibility of the motif 2 loop region and specifically A214, which may account for the reduced catalytic activity. G60Y completely abolishes XDG and UDG activity, which is consistent with a modeled structure in which G60Y blocks the entry of either xanthine or uracil to the base binding pocket. Most interestingly, a proline substitution at the G63 position switches the Gme SMUG1 enzyme to an exclusive UDG as demonstrated by the uniform excision of uracil in both double-stranded and single-stranded DNA and the complete loss of XDG activity. MD simulations indicate that a combination of a reduced free volume and altered flexibility in the active-site loops may underlie the dramatic effects of the G63P mutation on the activity profile of SMUG1. This study offers insights on the important role that modulation of conformational flexibility may play in defining specificity and catalytic efficiency.     

Raman spectroscopy of uracil DNA glycosylase-DNA complexes: insights into DNA damage recognition and catalysis

Using off-resonance Raman spectroscopy, we have examined each complex along the catalytic pathway of the DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG). The binding of undamaged DNA to UDG results in decreased intensity of the DNA Raman bands, which can be attributed to an increased level of base stacking, with little perturbation in the vibrational modes of the DNA backbone. A specific complex between UDG and duplex DNA containing 2'-beta-fluorodeoxyuridine shows similar increases in the level of DNA base stacking, but also a substrate-directed conformational change in UDG that is not observed with undamaged DNA, consistent with an induced-fit mechanism for damage site recognition. The similar increases in the level of DNA base stacking for the nonspecific and specific complexes suggest a common enzyme-induced distortion in the DNA, potentially DNA bending. The difference spectrum of the extrahelical uracil base in the substrate-analogue complexes reveals only a small electron density reorganization in the uracil ring for the ground state complex, but large 34 cm(-)(1) downshifts in the carbonyl normal modes. Thus, UDG activates the uracil ring in the ground state mainly through H bonds to its C=O groups, without destroying its quasi-aromaticity. This result is at variance with the conclusion from a recent crystal structure, in which the UDG active site significantly distorts the flipped-out pseudouridine analogue such that a change in hybridization at C1 occurs [Parikh, S. S., et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5083]. The Raman vibrational signature of the bound uracil product differs significantly from that of free uracil at neutral pH, and indicates that the uracil is anionic. This is consistent with recent NMR results, which established that the enzyme stabilizes the uracil anion leaving group by 3.4 pK(a) units compared to aqueous solution, contributing significantly to catalysis. These observations are generally not apparent from the high-resolution crystal structures of UDG and its complexes with DNA; thus, Raman spectroscopy can provide unique and valuable insights into the nature of enzyme-DNA interactions.     

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases—Structural and functional perspectives on an essential family of DNA repair enzymes

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases (UDGs) are evolutionarily conserved DNA repair enzymes that initiate the base excision repair pathway and remove uracil from DNA. The UDG superfamily is classified into six families based on their substrate specificity. This review focuses on the family I enzymes since these are the most extensively studied members of the superfamily. The structural basis for substrate specificity and base recognition as well as for DNA binding, nucleotide flipping and catalytic mechanism is discussed in detail. Other topics include the mechanism of lesion search and molecular mimicry through interaction with uracil‐DNA glycosylase inhibitors. The latest studies and findings detailing structure and function in the UDG superfamily are presented.     

Crystal structure of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase and its complexes with uracil and glycerol: structure and glycosylase mechanism revisited

The DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) catalyzes the hydrolysis of premutagenic uracil residues from single-stranded or duplex DNA, producing free uracil and abasic DNA. Here we report the high-resolution crystal structures of free UDG from Escherichia coli strain B (1.60 A), its complex with uracil (1.50 A), and a second active-site complex with glycerol (1.43 A). These represent the first high-resolution structures of a prokaryotic UDG to be reported. The overall structure of the E. coli enzyme is more similar to the human UDG than the herpes virus enzyme. Significant differences between the bacterial and viral structures are seen in the side-chain positions of the putative general-acid (His187) and base (Asp64), similar to differences previously observed between the viral and human enzymes. In general, the active-site loop that contains His187 appears preorganized in comparison with the viral and human enzymes, requiring smaller substrate-induced conformational changes to bring active-site groups into catalytic position. These structural differences may be related to the large differences in the mechanism of uracil recognition used by the E. coli and viral enzymes. The pH dependence of k(cat) for wild-type UDG and the D64N and H187Q mutant enzymes is consistent with general-base catalysis by Asp64, but provides no evidence for a general-acid catalyst. The catalytic mechanism of UDG is critically discussed with respect to these results.     

Thermostable uracil-DNA glycosylase from Thermotoga maritima a member of a novel class of DNA repair enzymes.

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) is a ubiquitous enzyme found in eukaryotes and prokaryotes [1][2][3]. This enzyme removes uracil bases that are present in DNA as a result of either deamination of cytosine or misincorporation of dUMP instead of dTMP [4] [5], and it is the primary activity in the DNA base excision repair pathway. Although UDG activities have been shown to be present in several thermophiles [6][7][8], no sequences have been found that are complementary to the Escherichia coli ung gene, which encodes UDG [9]. Here, we describe a UDG from the thermophile Thermotoga maritima. The T. maritima UDG gene has a low level of homology to the E. coli G-T/U mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase gene (mug). The expressed protein is capable of removing uracil from DNA containing either a U-A or a U-G base pair and is heat-stable up to 75 degrees C. The enzyme is also active on single-stranded DNA containing uracil. Analogous genes appear to be present in several prokaryotic organisms, including thermophilic and mesophilic eubacteria as well as archaebacteria, the human-disease pathogens Treponema palladium and Rickettsia prowazekii, and the extremely radioresistant organism Deinococcus radiodurans. These findings suggest that the T. maritima UDG is a member of a new class of DNA repair enzymes.     

Structure and specificity of the vertebrate anti-mutator uracil-DNA glycosylase SMUG1

Cytosine deamination is a major promutagenic process, generating G:U mismatches that can cause transition mutations if not repaired. Uracil is also introduced into DNA via nonmutagenic incorporation of dUTP during replication. In bacteria, uracil is excised by uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDG) related to E. coli UNG, and UNG homologs are found in mammals and viruses. Ung knockout mice display no increase in mutation frequency due to a second UDG activity, SMUG1, which is specialized for antimutational uracil excision in mammalian cells. Remarkably, SMUG1 also excises the oxidation-damage product 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HmU), but like UNG is inactive against thymine (5-methyluracil), a chemical substructure of HmU. We have solved the crystal structure of SMUG1 complexed with DNA and base-excision products. This structure indicates a more invasive interaction with dsDNA than observed with other UDGs and reveals an elegant water displacement/replacement mechanism that allows SMUG1 to exclude thymine from its active site while accepting HmU.     

Crystal structure of family 5 uracil-DNA glycosylase bound to DNA

Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) removes uracil generated by the deamination of cytosine or misincorporation of deoxyuridine monophosphate. Within the UDG superfamily, a fifth UDG family lacks a polar residue in the active-site motif, which mediates the hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond by activation of a water molecule in UDG families 1-4. We have determined the crystal structure of a novel family 5 UDG from Thermus thermophilus HB8 complexed with DNA containing an abasic site. The active-site structure suggests this enzyme uses both steric force and water activation for its excision reaction. A conserved asparagine residue acts as a ligand to the catalytic water molecule. The structure also implies that another water molecule acts as a barrier during substrate recognition. Based on no significant open-closed conformational change upon binding to DNA, we propose a "slide-in" mechanism for initial damage recognition.     

Chimeras between single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveal that their C-terminal domains interact with uracil DNA glycosylases

Uracil, a promutagenic base in DNA can arise by spontaneous deamination of cytosine or incorporation of dUMP by DNA polymerase. Uracil is removed from DNA by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), the first enzyme in the uracil excision repair pathway. We recently reported that the Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) facilitated uracil excision from certain structured substrates by E. coli UDG (EcoUDG) and suggested the existence of interaction between SSB and UDG. In this study, we have made use of the chimeric proteins obtained by fusion of N- and C-terminal domains of SSBs from E. coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis to investigate interactions between SSBs and UDGs. The EcoSSB or a chimera containing its C-terminal domain interacts with EcoUDG in a binary (SSB-UDG) or a ternary (DNA-SSB-UDG) complex. However, the chimera containing the N-terminal domain from EcoSSB showed no interactions with EcoUDG. Thus, the C-terminal domain (48 amino acids) of EcoSSB is necessary and sufficient for interaction with EcoUDG. The data also suggest that the C-terminal domain (34 amino acids) of MtuSSB is a predominant determinant for mediating its interaction with MtuUDG. The mechanism of how the interactions between SSB and UDG could be important in uracil excision repair pathway has been discussed.     

Uracil DNA Glycosylase Activity on Nucleosomal DNA Depends on Rotational Orientation of Targets

The activity of uracil DNA glycosylases (UDGs), which recognize and excise uracil bases from DNA, has been well characterized on naked DNA substrates but less is known about activity in chromatin. We therefore prepared a set of model nucleosome substrates in which single thymidine residues were replaced with uracil at specific locations and a second set of nucleosomes in which uracils were randomly substituted for all thymidines. We found that UDG efficiently removes uracil from internal locations in the nucleosome where the DNA backbone is oriented away from the surface of the histone octamer, without significant disruption of histone-DNA interactions. However, uracils at sites oriented toward the histone octamer surface were excised at much slower rates, consistent with a mechanism requiring spontaneous DNA unwrapping from the nucleosome. In contrast to the nucleosome core, UDG activity on DNA outside the core DNA region was similar to that of naked DNA. Association of linker histone reduced activity of UDG at selected sites near where the globular domain of H1 is proposed to bind to the nucleosome as well as within the extra-core DNA. Our results indicate that some sites within the nucleosome core and the extra-core (linker) DNA regions represent hot spots for repair that could influence critical biological processes.     

Consensus sequences for good and poor removal of uracil from double stranded DNA by uracil-DNA glycosylase.

We have purified uracil DNA-glycosylase (UDG) from calf thymus 32,000-fold and studied its biochemical properties, including sequence specificity. The enzyme is apparently closely related to human UDG, since it was recognised by a polyclonal antibody directed towards human UDG. SDS-PAGE and western analysis indicate an apparent M(r) = 27,500. Bovine UDG has a 1.7-fold preference for single stranded over double stranded DNA as a substrate. Sequence specificity for uracil removal from dsDNA was examined for bovine and Escherichia coli UDG, using DNA containing less than one dUMP residue per 100 nucleotides and synthetic oligonucleotides containing one dUMP residue. Comparative studies involving about 40 uracil sites indicated similar specificities for both UDGs. We found more than a 10-fold difference in rates of uracil removal between different sequences. 5'-G/CUT-3' and 5'-G/CUG/C-3' were consensus sequences for poor repair whereas 5'-A/TUAA/T-3' was a consensus for good repair. Sequence specificity was verified in double stranded oligonucleotides, but not in single stranded ones, suggesting that the structure of the double stranded DNA helix has influence on sequence specificity. Rate of uracil removal appeared to be slightly faster from U:A base pairs as compared to U:G mis-matches. The results indicate that sequence specific repair may be a determinant to be considered in mutagenesis.     

DNA Repair Enzyme Uracil DNA Glycosylase Is Specifically Incorporated into Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Viral Particles through a Vpr-Independent Mechanism

The Vpr protein, encoded by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genome, is one of the nonstructural proteins packaged in large amounts into viral particles. We have previously reported that Vpr associates with the DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG). In this study, we extended these observations by investigating whether UDG is incorporated into virions and whether this incorporation requires the presence of Vpr. Our results, with highly purified viruses, show that UDG is efficiently incorporated either into wild-type virions or into Vpr-deficient HIV-1 virions, indicating that Vpr is not involved in UDG packaging. Using an in vitro protein-protein binding assay, we reveal a direct interaction between the precursor form of UDG and the viral integrase (IN). Finally, we demonstrate that IN-defective viruses fail to incorporate UDG, indicating that IN is required for packaging of UDG into virions.     

Mutational analysis of the base-flipping mechanism of uracil DNA glycosylase

The DNA repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) locates unwanted uracil bases in genomic DNA using a remarkable base-flipping mechanism in which the entire deoxyuridine nucleotide is rotated from the DNA base stack into the enzyme active site. Enzymatic base flipping has been described as a three-step process involving phosphodiester backbone pinching, base extrusion through active pushing and plugging by a leucine side chain that inserts in the DNA minor groove, and, finally, pulling by hydrogen-bonding groups that interact with the extrahelical base. Here we employ mutagenesis in combination with transient kinetic approaches to assess the functional roles of six conserved enzymatic groups of UDG that have been implicated in the "pinch, push, plug, and pull" base-flipping mechanism. Our results show that these mutant enzymes are capable of flipping the uracil base from the duplex, but that many of these mutations prevent a subsequent induced fit conformational step in which catalytic groups of UDG dock with the flipped-out base. These studies support our previous model for base flipping in which a conformational gating step closely follows base extrusion from the DNA duplex [Stivers, J. T., et al. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 952-963]. A model that accounts for the temporal and functional roles of these side chain interactions along the reaction pathway for base flipping is presented.