Assembly and properties of chromatin containing histone H1

The Xenopus oocyte supernatant (oocyte S-150) forms chromatin in a reaction that is affected by temperature and by the concentration of ATP and Mg. Under optimal conditions at 27 degrees C, relaxed DNA plasmids are efficiently assembled into supercoiled minichromosomes with the endogenous histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B. This assembly reaction is a gradual process that takes four to six hours for completion. Micrococcal nuclease digestions of the chromatin assembled under these conditions generate an extended series of DNA fragments that are, on average, multiples of 180 base-pairs. We have examined the effect of histone H1 in this system. Exogenous histone H1, when added at a molar ratio of H1 to nucleosome of 1:1 to 5:1, causes an increase in the micrococcal nuclease resistance of the chromatin without causing chromatin aggregation under these experimental conditions. Furthermore, the periodically arranged nucleosomes display longer internucleosome distances, and the average length of the nucleosome repeat is a function of the amount of histone H1 added, when this histone is present at the onset of the assembly process. In contrast, no major change in the length of the nucleosome repeat is observed when histone H1 is added at the end of the chromatin assembly process. Protein analyses of the purified minichromosomes show that histone H1 is incorporated in the chromatin that is assembled in the S-150 supplemented with histone H1. The amount of histone H1 bound to chromatin is a function of the total amount of histone H1 added. We define here the parameters that generate histone H1-containing chromatin with native nucleosome repeats from 160 to 220 base-pairs, and we discuss the implications of these studies.     

Histones H1 and H4 of surface-spread meiotic chromosomes

The chromatin conformation of somatic and meiotic chromosomes is, at least in part, a function of electrostatic nucleosome interactions that are mediated by transient acetylation of the histone H4 N-terminal domain and phosphorylation of histone H1. The distribution of those histones in the chromatin of meiotic chromosomes is reported here. Antibodies to testis-specific histone 1, H1t, detect H1t in the chromatin of mouse meiotic prophase chromosomes only after synapsis and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly is completed and before core separation is initiated. The H1t protein is evenly distributed over euchromatin, heterochromatin and the SC. Antibodies to acetylated lysine residues 5, 12 or 16 of histone H4, indicate that the euchromatin is more acetylated than the centromeric heterochromatin. The pattern is most pronounced for acetylated residue 5 and least for 16. Antibodies to phosphorylated H1 epitopes do not react with chromatin but, instead, recognize the chromosome cores and SCs. Possibly these are not phosphorylated histone H1 epitopes, but SC proteins with similar potentially phosphorylatable sequences such as KTPTK of the synaptic protein Syn1.     

Histone H1(0) is distributed unlike H1 in chromatin aggregation

Non-uniform distribution of H1 histone in bovine thymus chromatin was demonstrated previously. Two classes of chromatin differ in aggregation properties and histone content. The class aggregatable by physiological saline is enriched in H1, especially H1ab, the variant known to be most powerful in condensing DNA. Now, the distribution of H1 subtypes is reported for brain chromatin, where H1ab and H1c were distributed as in thymus. In contrast, H1(0) preferred neither the aggregatable chromatin nor the aggregation-resistant class. It is suggested that H1(0) is uniformly distributed with regard to euchromatin and heterochromatin, whereas H1 is concentrated in heterochromatin.     

Histone H1 and chromatin interactions in human fibroblast nuclei after H1 depletion and reconstitution with H1 subfractions.

BACKGROUND: Linker histones constitute a family of lysine-rich proteins associated with nucleosome core particles and linker DNA in eukaryotic chromatin. In permeabilized cells, they can be extracted from nuclei by using salt concentration in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 M. Although other nuclear proteins are also extracted at 0.7 M salt, the remaining nucleus represents a template that is relatively intact. METHODS: A cytochemical method was used to study the affinity of reconstituted linker histones for chromatin in situ in cultured human fibroblasts. We also investigated their ability to condense chromatin by using DNA-specific osmium ammine staining for electron microscopy. RESULTS: Permeabilized and H1-depleted fibroblast nuclei were suitable for the study of linker histone-chromatin interactions after reconstitution with purified linker histone subfractions. Our results showed that exogenous linker histones bind to chromatin with lower affinity than the native ones. We detected no significant differences between the main H1 and H1 degrees histone fractions with respect to their affinity for chromatin or in their ability to condense chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: Linker histone interactions with chromatin are controlled also by mechanisms independent of linker histone subtype composition.     

The multifunctional protein nucleophosmin (NPM1) is a human linker histone H1 chaperone

Linker histone H1 plays an essential role in chromatin organization. Proper deposition of linker histone H1 as well as its removal is essential for chromatin dynamics and function. Linker histone chaperones perform this important task during chromatin assembly and other DNA-templated phenomena in the cell. Our in vitro data show that the multifunctional histone chaperone NPM1 interacts with linker histone H1 through its first acidic stretch (residues 120-132). Association of NPM1 with linker histone H1 was also observed in cells in culture. NPM1 exhibited remarkable linker histone H1 chaperone activity, as it was able to efficiently deposit histone H1 onto dinucleosomal templates. Overexpression of NPM1 reduced the histone H1 occupancy on the chromatinized template of HIV-1 LTR in TZM-bl cells, which led to enhanced Tat-mediated transactivation. These data identify NPM1 as an important member of the linker histone chaperone family in humans.     

HMG-D and histone H1 interplay during chromatin assembly and early embryogenesis

HMG-D is an abundant chromosomal protein associated with condensed chromatin during the first nuclear cleavage cycles of the developing Drosophila embryo. We previously suggested that HMG-D might substitute for the linker histone H1 in the preblastoderm embryo and that this substitution might result in the characteristic less compacted chromatin. We have now studied the association of HMG-D with chromatin using a cell-free system for chromatin reconstitution derived from Drosophila embryos. Association of HMG-D with chromatin, like that of histone H1, increases the nucleosome spacing indicative of binding to the linker DNA between nucleosomes. HMG-D interacts with DNA during the early phases of nucleosome assembly but is gradually displaced as chromatin matures. By contrast, purified chromatin can be loaded with stoichiometric amounts of HMG-D, and this can be displaced upon addition of histone H1. A direct physical interaction between HMG-D and histone H1 was observed in a Far Western analysis. The competitive nature of this interaction is reminiscent of the apparent replacement of HMG-D by H1 during mid-blastula transition. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that HMG-D functions as a specialized linker protein prior to appearance of histone H1.     

Histone H3 Tail Modifications Alter Structure and Dynamics of the H1 C-Terminal Domain Within Nucleosomes

The highly positively charged and intrinsically disordered H1 C-terminal domain (CTD) undergoes extensive condensation upon binding to nucleosomes, and stabilizes nucleosomes and higher-order chromatin structures but its interactions in chromatin are not well defined. Using single-molecule FRET we found that about half of the H1 CTDs in H1-nucleosome complexes exhibit well-defined FRET values indicative of distinct, static conformations, while the remainder of the population exhibits exchange between multiple defined FRET structures. Moreover, crosslinking studies indicate that the first 30 residues of the H1 CTD participate in relatively localized contacts with the first ∼25 bp of linker DNA, and that two separate regions in the CTD contribute to H1-dependent organization of linker DNA. Finally, we show that acetylation mimetics within the histone H3 tail markedly reduce the overall extent of H1 CTD condensation and significantly increase the fraction of H1 CTDs undergoing dynamic exchange between FRET states. Our results indicate the nucleosome-bound H1 CTD adopts loosely defined structures that exhibit significantly enhanced dynamics and decondensation upon epigenetic acetylation within the H3 tail.     

Reassociation of histone H1 with nucleosomes.

The role of histone H1 in nucleosome heterogeneity and structure has been studied using a reconstitution procedure. Histone H1 and non-histone proteins are removed selectively from enzymatically fragmented chromatin by Dowex 50W-X2 treatment. The resulting "stripped" chromatin then is reassociated with purified histone H1 using step gradient dialysis. Material reconstituted in this manner was examined by gel electrophoresis, protein cross-linking, and chromatin fingerprinting. The results demonstrate that the histone H1 molecule efficiently binds to nucleosomes with fidelity in an apparent noncooperative manner. Polynucleosomes possess two specific binding sites for histone H1 per histone octamer; the first binding site is of higher affinity than the second. The 160-base pair nuclease digestion barrier and nucleosome electrophoretic class (MIII)n are established upon binding the 1st histone H1 molecule. Upon binding the 2nd histone H1 molecule, polynucleosomes assume a highly compact conformation. The experimental approach introduced here should permit determining whether nucleosomes possess independent specific binding sites for other chromosomal proteins, and should allow reconstitution of the other electrophoretic forms of nucleosomes which we have described previously.     

Differential association of linker histones H1 and H5 with telomeric nucleosomes in chicken erythrocytes.

Rat liver telomeric DNA is organised into nucleosomes characterised by a shorter and more homogeneous average nucleosomal repeat than bulk chromatin as shown by Makarov et al. (1). The latter authors were unable to detect the association of any linker histone with the telomeric DNA. We have confirmed these observations but show that in sharp contrast chicken erythrocyte telomeric DNA is organised into nucleosomes whose spacing length and heterogeneity are indistinguishable from those of bulk chromatin. We further show that chicken erythrocyte telomeric chromatin contains chromatosomes which are preferentially associated with histone H1 relative to histone H5. This contrasts with bulk chromatin where histone H5 is the more abundant species. This observation strongly suggests that telomeric DNA condensed into nucleosome core particles has a higher affinity for H1 than H5. We discuss the origin of the discrimination of the lysine rich histones in terms of DNA sequence preferences, telomere nucleosome preferences and particular constraints of the higher order chromatin structure of telomeres.     

In vitro induction of H1-H1 histone cross-linking by adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymers

It is well-known that H1-H1 interactions are very important for the induction of 30 nm chromatin fiber and that, among all posttranslational modifications, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is one of those capable of modifying chromatin structure, mainly through H1 histone. As this protein can undergo both covalent and noncovalent modifications by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, our aim was to investigate whether and how ADP-ribose polymers, by themselves, are able to affect the formation of H1-H1 oligomers, which are normally present in a condensed chromatin structure. The results obtained in our in vitro experimental system indicate that ADP-ribose polymers are involved in chromatin decondensation. This conclusion was reached as the result of two different observations: (a) H1 histone molecules can be hosted in clusters on ADP-ribose polymers, as shown by their ability to be chemically cross-linked, and (b) H1 histone has a higher affinity for ADP-ribose polymers than for DNA; ADP-ribose polymers compete, in fact, with DNA for H1 histone binding.     

Accessibility of histone H1° and its structural domains to antibody binding in extended and folded chromatin

The aim of this work was to study the accessibility of histone H1° and its structural domains to antibody binding in high molecular mass chromatin fragments of different conformations. Three types of specific antibody populations were used: (1) anti-H1° which reacted with antigenic determinants situated along the whole polypeptide chain, (2) anti-GH5 or anti-GH1° which recognized epitopes located in the globular region of H1° and (3) anti-C-tail antibodies reacting specifically with fragment 99–193 of the protein molecule. The immunoreactivity of the chromatin-bound antigen was investigated by solid-phase ELISA performed on glutaraldehyde-cross-linked chromatin and by an inhibition assay carried out with native chromatin in solution. The results of both methods were unidirectional and showed that: (1) the accessibility of H1° did not change with the compaction of the fiber; (2) the G-domain was not accessible to antibodies either in the relaxed or in the condensed state of the fragments, (3) the binding of the C-terminus-specific antibodies was different for isolated monosomes and for the chromatin fiber and (4) the degree of exposure of the epitopes of H1° in chromatin was much less than that of histone H1.Abbreviations ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - G-domain Globular domain - IgG Immunoglobulin G - SDS Sodium Dodecylsulphate     

Histone acetylation reduces H1-mediated nucleosome interactions during chromatin assembly

During chromatin replication and nucleosome assembly, newly synthesized histone H4 is acetylated before it is deposited onto DNA, then deacetylated as assembly proceeds. In a previous study (Perry and Annunziato, Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4275 [1989]) it was shown that when replication occurs in the presence of sodium butyrate (thereby inhibiting histone deacetylation), nascent chromatin fails to mature fully and instead remains preferentially sensitive to DNaseI, more soluble in magnesium, and depleted of histone H1 (relative to mature chromatin). In the following report the relationships between chromatin replication, histone acetylation, and H1-mediated nucleosome aggregation were further investigated. Chromatin was replicated in the presence or absence of sodium butyrate; isolated nucleosomes were stripped of linker histone, reconstituted with H1, and treated to produce Mg(2+)-soluble and Mg(2+)-insoluble chromatin fractions. Following the removal of H1, all solubility differences between chromatin replicated in sodium butyrate for 30 min (bu-chromatin) and control chromatin were lost. Reconstitution with H1 completely restored the preferential Mg(2+)-solubility of bu-chromatin, demonstrating that a reduced capacity for aggregation/condensation is an inherent feature of acetylated nascent nucleosomes; however, titration with excess H1 caused the solubility differences to be lost again. Moreover, when the core histone N-terminal "tails" (the sites of acetylation) were removed by trypsinization prior to reconstitution, H1 was unable to reestablish the altered solubility of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Thus, the core histone "tails," and the acetylation thereof, not only modulate H1-mediated nucleosome interactions in vitro, but also strongly influence the ability of H1 to differentiate between new and old nucleosomes. The data suggest a possible mechanism for the control of H1 deposition and/or chromatin folding during nucleosome assembly.     

Chromatin-associated protein phosphatase 1 regulates aurora-B and histone H3 phosphorylation

Proper chromosome condensation requires the phosphorylation of histone and nonhistone chromatin proteins. We have used an in vitro chromosome assembly system based on Xenopus egg cytoplasmic extracts to study mitotic histone H3 phosphorylation. We identified a histone H3 Ser(10) kinase activity associated with isolated mitotic chromosomes. The histone H3 kinase was not affected by inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases, DNA-dependent protein kinase, p90(rsk), or cAMP-dependent protein kinase. The activity could be selectively eluted from mitotic chromosomes and immunoprecipitated by specific anti-X aurora-B/AIRK2 antibodies. This activity was regulated by phosphorylation. Treatment of X aurora-B immunoprecipitates with recombinant protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) inhibited kinase activity. The presence of PP1 on chromatin suggested that PP1 might directly regulate the X aurora-B associated kinase activity. Indeed, incubation of isolated interphase chromatin with the PP1-specific inhibitor I2 and ATP generated an H3 kinase activity that was also specifically immunoprecipitated by anti-X aurora-B antibodies. Nonetheless, we found that stimulation of histone H3 phosphorylation in interphase cytosol does not drive chromosome condensation or targeting of 13 S condensin to chromatin. In summary, the chromosome-associated mitotic histone H3 Ser(10) kinase is associated with X aurora-B and is inhibited directly in interphase chromatin by PP1.     

Histone H1 and chromatin higher order structure. Does histone H1 exhibit specific self-association?

1. Histones H1 and H5 in chromatin and in free solution can be cross-linked to higher multimers. Is this due to a specific protein/protein interaction? If so, this interaction might be the structural basis of the condensation of the chromosomal nucleofilament, known to be mediated by histones H1 and H5. 2. Since only the central domain of H1 and H5 exhibits tertiary folding and globular structure, this is the most likely site of specific interaction. 3. Formaldehyde has been used to test whether the central domains of histone H1 from calf thymus or from sea urchin sperm or histone H5 from chicken erythrocytes self-interact. 4. The cross-linking shown by each globular peptide was compared with that of its parent histone. 5. In all three cases the peptide cross-linked to a much lower extent than its intact parent histone and the observed cross-linked rates were roughly in proportion to the relative number of lysine residues parent histone and peptide. 6. It is concluded that there is no specific self-interaction between the globular domains of either H1 or H5 molecules in free solution. 7. This result suggests that specific H1/H1 protein/protein interactions are not the basic cause of chromatin condensation.     

Histone crosslinking patterns indicate dynamic binding of histone H1 in chromatin

Crosslinking of histone H1 molecules to each other and to the core histones with bifunctional reagents in mouse liver nuclei and chromatin was compared with that under the conditions of random 'contacts' between these molecules. The patterns of crosslinking of the H1 subfractions (H1A, H1B, and H10) to each other in nuclei, chromatin and in solution at different ionic strengths due to random collisions were essentially the same. Moreover, the contacts between the H1 molecules were qualitatively the same in nuclei, chromatin and in solution also at the level of the chymotryptic halves of the H1 molecules. The contacts between the H1 molecules and the core histones in nuclei were similar to those obtained in chromatin at 70 mM NaCl, when H1 molecules readily migrate, and at 0.6 M NaCl, when H1 molecules are dissociated from chromatin. We conclude that spatial arrangement of H1 subfractions and mutual orientation of H1 molecules in isolated nuclei are random-like at least in terms of cross-linking. The static and dynamic models of histone H1 binding to chromatin compatible with the known data are considered. Although unequivocal verification of the models is not possible at present, the dynamic models do correspond better to recent data on the location of the histone H1 in nuclei and chromatin.     

Prothymosin alpha modulates the interaction of histone H1 with chromatin.

Prothymosin alpha (ProTalpha) is an abundant acidic nuclear protein that may be involved in cell proliferation. In our search for its cellular partners, we have recently found that ProTalpha binds to linker histone H1. We now provide further evidence for the physiological relevance of this interaction by immunoisolation of a histone H1-ProTalpha complex from NIH 3T3 cell extracts. A detailed analysis of the interaction between the two proteins suggests contacts between the acidic region of ProTalpha and histone H1. In the context of a physiological chromatin reconstitution reaction, the presence of ProTalpha does not affect incorporation of an amount of histone H1 sufficient to increase the nucleosome repeat length by 20 bp, but prevents association of all further H1. Consistent with this finding, a fraction of histone H1 is released when H1-containing chromatin is challenged with ProTalpha. These results imply at least two different interaction modes of H1 with chromatin, which can be distinguished by their sensitivity to ProTalpha. The properties of ProTalpha suggest a role in fine tuning the stoichiometry and/or mode of interaction of H1 with chromatin.