Maximizing breast projection after free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty

In 1922, Thorek described standard free-nipple reduction mammaplasty for gigantomastia. This technique provided a simple and effective way to perform reduction mammaplasty. However, the technique is frequently criticized for producing a breast and nipple with poor projection. Even with the standard modification of the original technique, the resultant breast and nipple may be wide and flat, with unpredictable nipple-areola pigmentation. To create a breast mound and nipple with projection and even pigmentation, the free-nipple-graft breast reduction technique is presented. The Wise pattern skin reduction markings and the superiorly based parenchymal reduction technique are used. After the nipple-areola complex is removed, as a free graft, the inferior pole of the breast is then amputated along the Wise pattern skin markings, leaving lateral and medial pillars of breast tissue, with the apex of the resection corresponding to the new nipple location. The lateral and medial pillars of the superiorly based breast mound are then sutured together. Key interrupted sutures are placed, beginning at the most inferior and posterior point of the pillars, while recruiting tissue centrally to increase the projection. The intersecting point of the inverted T, at 7 cm from the new nipple position, is then sutured to the fasciae of the pectoralis major muscle. If more central projection is desired, the vertical limb design can be lengthened. The tissue inferior to the 7-cm mark is de-epithelialized and tucked under the central breast, if needed, contributing further to the final breast parenchyma projection. The skin of the vertical limb of the Wise pattern is then closed with a dog-ear at the apex to further contribute to nipple projection. The nipple is replaced as a free, thick, split-thickness skin graft. The breast is temporarily closed, and the medial and lateral breast tissue excess is liposuctioned to create a more conical breast. Excessive medial and lateral skin is then resected, keeping the inframammary crease incision under the breast mound. Twenty-five patients underwent free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty using this technique between 1992 and 2000. An average of 1600 g of breast tissue per breast was removed. The average follow-up period was 36 months. Patient satisfaction has been very high.     

Subcutaneous mastectomy. The excess skin problem.

Subcantaneous mastectomy through a lateral approach, with preservation of the nipple and areola on a dermal pedicle, removing the excess skin at the time of aubautaneous mastectomy, is a safe procedure which results in esthetically acceptable breasts. The surgical approach greatly facilitates the removal of the entire glandular portion of the breast. The need for a second surgical procedure is eliminated. Lateral biopsy scars can be reinforced by the dermal sling support, thereby decreasing the chances of exposure of the implant. The implant is also successfully and easily held in position by the use of the dermal-fat sling support. The nipple and areola survive quite well on the dermal pedicle, with preservation of contractility and sensation, as well as of blood supply.     

Reduction mammaplasty in postburn breasts.

Thermal injury to the anterior chest in the adolescent girl can lead to severe disfigurement of the breasts. Just as in certain non-burn female patients, mammary hyperplasia can occur in patients with previous full-thickness burns of their breasts. Most plastic surgeons have been reluctant to perform reduction mammaplasty in these patients for fear of devascularizing the skin graft or the nipple-areola complex. A series of six patients with full-thickness burns of the breasts and subsequent skin graft coverage before reduction mammaplasty is reported. Four patients had bilaterally burned breasts requiring reduction. Two patients had one burned breast reduced, and one required a balancing procedure on the unburned side. Reduction mammaplasty was performed using the inferior-pedicle technique. The mean amount of tissue removed for the left and right breasts was 454 and 395 g, respectively. There was no nipple loss, hematoma, infection, or major loss of skin flaps. Reduction mammaplasty in this group of patients is safe and carries minimal risk if certain key concepts are followed carefully.     

The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study

Although preservation of the sensitivity of the nipple and areola is an important goal in breast surgery, only scant and contradictory information about the course and distribution of the supplying nerves is found in the literature. The existing controversy might be due to the difficulty in dissecting the thin nerves and to frequent anatomic variations that bias the results if only a small number of cadavers are dissected. We dissected 28 female cadavers and found that the nipple and areola were always innervated by the lateral and anterior cutaneous branches of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th intercostal nerves. The most constant innervation pattern was by the 4th lateral cutaneous branch (79 percent) and by the 3rd and 4th anterior cutaneous branches (57 percent). The anterior cutaneous branches took a superficial course within the subcutaneous tissue and terminated at the medial areolar border in all dissected breasts. The lateral cutaneous branches took a deep course within the pectoral fascia and reached the nipple from its posterior surface in 93 percent of the dissected breasts. In 7 percent of the dissected breasts, the lateral cutaneous branches took a superficial course within the subcutaneous fat and reached the nipple from the lateral side. These findings suggest that the nerves innervating the nipple and areola are best protected if resections at the base of the breast and skin incisions at the medial areolar border are avoided.     

Integrated breast mound reduction and nipple reconstruction with the wraparound flap.

A new method for nipple reconstruction is described that combines revision of an autologous tissue breast mound with creation of a projecting nipple. The method is applicable only to reconstructed breast mounds that must be reduced or lifted to achieve symmetry with the opposite breast. In this technique, the mound is reduced as if it were a normal breast, using an inverted-T or vertical mammaplasty pattern. In this way, breast projection can be increased and, if necessary, the inframammary fold can be elevated. A rectangular flap is created from skin and subcutaneous tissue that would normally be discarded during the breast reduction, and this flap is wrapped around on itself to form a projecting nipple. This new technique avoids the flattening of the breast mound usually seen after nipple reconstruction because it does not take tissue away from the completed breast mound to make the nipple. In appropriate patients who require reduction in size of their reconstructed breast mound, the wraparound flap nipple reconstruction is worth considering.     

Breast reduction with short L scar

I didactically compared the breast as a glandular cone with an envelope of skin and subcutaneous tissue. The aesthetic alterations of the breast are classified in four groups related to form, to volume, to grams, and to ptosis in centimeters. An imaginary plane that passes by the mammary sulcus (plane A) will determine the area of the breast that is ptotic. The projection of this plane in the anterior part of the breast is called point A. The distance between point A and the nipple will give in centimeters the amount of ptosis. I use this distance to draw geometrically in the breast the amount of excess of skin to be removed to correct the ptosis. In group I, the volume is normal and part of the mammary gland is under plane A. In this type of breast, the skin is resected, and since there is no excess of breast tissue, the breast that is under plane A is used as an inferior pedicle flap to give a better volume to the new breast. In group II, the base of the breast is large, the height is normal, and the volume is increased by the enlargement of the base. In this type of breast, the excess of breast under plane A and a wedge under the nipple are resected to reach the normal volume at the end of the surgery. In group III, the base is normal and the volume of the breast is increased by the height. For treatment, I resect the excess of breast under plane A as well as a segment at the base to reduce its height. In group IV, the volume of the breast is increased by the size of the base and the height of the cone, and I treat by resection of the excess of tissue under the ptotic area, a wedge under the areola, and a transversal segment in the base to reduce all the dimensions. In the final result of this technique in the majority of patients I will obtain a short scar. This technique was used in 1083 patients from January of 1979 to May of 1988.     

Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty

Breast sensation after reduction mammaplasty is a major concern for surgeons and patients. The sensitivity of 80 breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique (a superior dermoglandular pedicle with resection at the lower quadrants) was assessed in a prospective study. Ten points were selected on each breast for this study, including the nipple, four points on the areola, and five points on the breast skin. The measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pressure thresholds were measured with 20 Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, temperature sensitivity with hot and cold metal probes, vibratory thresholds with the Biotesiometer, and static and moving two-point discrimination tests with a Disk-Criminator. To assess the influence of breast ptosis and hypertrophy on sensitivity, the population was divided into two groups. In group I (19 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was less than 29 cm, and less than 500 g of tissue per breast was removed. In group II (21 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was more than 29 cm, and more than 500 g of tissue was resected. The sensitivity on the nipple and areola was significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months postoperatively for all modalities. At 1 year, sensitivity recovered, and no breast or nipple-areola complex was insensitive. Pressure sensitivity was not significantly different from the preoperative measurement in any area of the breast or in either group of patients, except for superior breast skin, for which sensitivity was improved in group II (p = 0.0004). Temperature sensitivity in group I was not different preoperatively and postoperatively, but in group II, a significant decrease was observed in sensitivity for the nipple and areola (p = 0.01 and 0.004, respectively). Vibratory sensitivity was significantly decreased on the nipple, the areola, and the inferior breast skin (p = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively) in group II but not in group I.In conclusion, ptotic or moderately hypertrophied breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique recovered their preoperative level of sensitivity after an initial postoperative decline. However, in large breasts, although pressure sensitivity recovered after 1 year, temperature and vibration sensitivity remained diminished on the nipple-areola complex.     

Refinements in transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: projection and contour improvements

A surgical procedure with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is presented using parameters from the opposite normal breast to achieve a better cone shape in the new breast to project the nipple-areola complex. This cone projection is obtained through a vertical plication of both skin/fat halves of the TRAM flap and with two supraumbilical fat flaps to avoid cone collapse. The infraclavicular and axillary regions are filled with a de-epithelialized "fish-fin" cutaneous-fat or fat-only flap, which is placed as a lateral TRAM extension. The de-epithelialized lateral extremity of the TRAM flap folded over itself gives a mound shape to the lateral aspect of the new breast, and the inverted umbilical stalk attached to the TRAM flap imitates a nipple. This procedure is based on six breast reconstructions with a 2-year follow-up. The procedure is a simple, safe, and versatile way to mimic the opposite breast. It is mostly indicated for thin patients who have small to moderate breasts without ptosis or hypertrophy who refuse breast implants or request a mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty on the opposite normal breast during the same procedure.     

Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases.

No surgeon likes to face complications. It takes effort to treat them personally and more effort to note, count, analyze, and demonstrate them. The author carefully followed 250 personal consecutive patients (476 breasts) who underwent vertical mammaplasties between 1990 and 1998; studying the complications and their relationship with the types of breasts and patients was very instructive. The main observations from this study follow. The most frequent benign complication was seroma (5 percent of breasts), which usually required one or two aspirations after surgery. Hematomas occurred in six patients (1.2 percent of breasts), who had all had mastopexies. Hematomas required immediate surgical evacuation. The major complication of breast reduction, i.e., areola necrosis, was rare (only two partial necroses occurred), but it left deformities that were difficult to correct. Infection without tissue necrosis was rare (two cases), and healing complications happened in only 5.4 percent of all cases. Healing complications were directly related to the size and fat content of the breasts. None occurred in mastopexy cases. For reductions, delayed skin healing was observed in 5 percent of cases and delayed breast tissue healing in 3 percent of cases. More healing complications occurred after liposuction of the breast, which was performed in the more fatty breasts. Delayed healing of skin and breast tissue was bothersome because healing was slow, but it left only a moderate deformity. In cases of delayed healing, frequent dressings, rinsing the wound with antiseptic solutions, giving antibiotics if needed, and refraining from early surgical intervention are the keys to success. Good personal contact with the patient, especially if healing is slow, is the best way of helping her and avoiding aggressive attitudes. In conclusion, this survey revealed few complications; however, it does show that the risk of delayed and slow healing is greater in larger breasts. In obese patients, a simpler operation may be indicated, such as liposuction with skin reduction alone or a free nipple graft, as long as the patient is not motivated to obtain the best possible result.     

The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach.

An improved L mammaplasty technique was employed in 178 patients aged 13 to 55 years, with reductions of up to 1280 gm per breast, with small, well-positioned, and undistorted scars. I have obtained a satisfactory final shape of the breast with no major complications over a 3-year follow-up period. The markings are based on chest width and on the quantity of skin that will remain. The technique allows the surgeon to remove more skin, and it is indicated for minor, moderate, and large hypertrophies, as well as for ptotic and asymmetrical breasts. The resection comprises skin and mammary tissue from the inferior and middle portions of the breast, preserving the main lactiferous ducts. In case of hypertrophic breasts, the base is removed, preserving the branches of the lateral cutaneous nerves, which derive from the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves.     

Reliability of inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty in burned oversized breasts

Heavy pendulous breasts cause physical and psychological trauma. Postburn deformity of breasts results in significant asymmetry, displacement of nipple-areola complex, due to burn scar contracture, and significant scarring; these factors add more psychological discomfort and subsequent behavioral changes. The use of the inferior pedicle procedure in burned breasts can solve many problems. The technique reduces the size of the large breast, eliminates the scar tissue by excising both medial and lateral flaps, and brings the mal-located nipple and areola to a normal position. This study stresses the possibility of harvesting the inferior dermal pedicle flap from within the postburn scar tissue without necrosis of the nipple and areola, because of the excellent flap circulation. Acceptable aesthetic appearance and retainment of nipple viability and sensitivity can be achieved with the inferior pedicle technique even with postburn deformity of the breast. The study was conducted on 11 women, all of whom had sustained deep thermal burns to the breasts and anterior torso and whose breasts were hypertrophied and pendulous.     

Virginal hypertrophy

A patient with extensive juvenile hypertrophy of the breasts has been presented. Several interesting facts in the case history are as follows: After pregnancy, the breasts did not regress with "hormone shots" to stop lactation. The patient took high-dosage estrogen birth control pills for 3 years before the breasts started to grow rapidly. Within 1 month after reduction mammaplasty and despite 20 mg dydrogesterone per day, the breasts started to enlarge. A total of 60 mg b.i.d. of dydrogesterone did not stop breast regrowth. Tamoxifen citrate did cause regression of the breasts. After two reductions, the breasts regrew with a subsequent pregnancy. The breast tissue regrew in the axilla with a subsequent pregnancy after simple mastectomy-subcutaneous mastectomy and free nipple transplants. Chronic marijuana use may have an effect on the breast tissue in certain susceptible females as well as in some males. Much needs to be learned about the control of growth of female breast tissue.     

New aspects of the topographical anatomy of the mammary gland regarding its neurovascular supply along a regular ligamentous suspension

The exact location of the main nerves and vessels to the breast and the nipple-areola complex has always been obscure. We found that the course of the rich neurovascular supply to the nipple runs along a regularly-located, suspensory apparatus and can therefore be predicted exactly. It consists of a horizontal fibrous septum originating at the pectoral fascia along the 5th rib, merging into vertical ligaments along the sternum medially and along the lateral border of pectoralis minor laterally. Cranially, and in an anterior direction, the vertical ligaments are connected by the superficial fascia. In the current anatomical study, we seek to demonstrate the vascular supply provided by these structures more impressively. For this purpose we dissected the ligamentous suspension after intraarterial injection with colored latex in both breasts of 10 female cadavers. The large vessels, guided by this circle of fibrous attachments could then be seen clearly. In a further 4 female cadavers, a similar procedure was performed after intraarterial injection of surgical ink. This stained the vascular layers even more intensely. This topographical knowledge has clinical relevance. The rich and constant neurovascular supply to the nipple areola complex may be maintained in a new breast-reduction technique, which allows safe postoperative viability and sensibility of the nipple. The clinical results act as a striking evidence of our anatomical findings. Further procedures taking advantage of the easy determination and access to the neurovascular supply may be seen in future.     

Improving safety and aesthetic results in inverted T scar breast reduction

Breast reduction using an inverted T scar skin design and a variety of glandular pedicle types is widely practiced and is the standard by which more recent limited scar techniques are judged. The inverted T procedures are attractive because they are predictable and versatile and permit great control over both the extent of reduction and the breast-shaping process. Despite these advantages, common criticisms of inverted T scar techniques include breast shape abnormalities, areolar malposition, hypertrophic scars, and poor long-term projection. Preoperative markings influence both safety and aesthetics. A method of skin marking that is based on a displacement method to determine vertical limb splay angle is described. This design concept must be modified to address certain variants, such as macromastia presenting with normal nipple position or large-diameter areolae, moderately severe macromastia, and macromastia involving radiated breasts. Safety in breast reduction is improved by paying attention to patient positioning issues, using techniques that minimize blood loss, raising flaps of appropriate thickness in the correct plane, and performing resection by observing the principles that reduce the risk of compromise of nipple and areolar circulation. Aesthetic results are improved by analyzing vertical breast meridian lengths during final breast shaping, modifying areolar shape as necessary, and carefully tailoring the medial inframammary crease. The latter is also important for minimizing the potential for scar hypertrophy. The principles presented have been refined during the course of a 12-year experience with several hundred breast reduction procedures. They contribute to improved results in inverted T scar breast reduction when practiced consistently.     

Repeat reduction mammaplasty

Repeat reduction mammaplasty is an uncommonly performed procedure. Currently, no clear operative guidelines of management exist. Sixteen patients (28 breasts) with a mean age of 29 years (range, 13 to 52 years) underwent repeat breast reduction over an 11-year period. Before the first reduction, the mean notch to nipple distance was 29.6 cm (range, 24 to 38 cm) and mean nipple to inframammary crease distance was 15.5 cm (range, 12 to 18 cm). The mean mass of tissue excised was 615 g per breast. A number of different pedicles were used (six inferior, five superior, four superomedial, one unknown). All patients subsequently developed pseudoptosis. The nipple to inframammary crease distance was a mean of 11.4 cm (having initially been set at 7 cm) before the second procedure. At the second operation, two patients (three breasts) had their initial pedicles transected and the nipple-areola complex moved, and both patients developed vascular compromise of the nipple-areola complex (two breasts). Where the same pedicle was used in the second operation (five patients, 10 breasts), one patient developed unilateral nipple-areola complex necrosis. In eight patients, because of the development of pseudoptosis, the nipple was in a satisfactory position, and therefore only an inferior wedge of tissue required excision. This was performed without nipple-areola complex compromise, irrespective of the initial pedicle. The mean mass of tissue excised in the second operation was 325 g per breast (range, 120 to 620 g). Fourteen patients were available for follow-up after a mean of 5.1 years (range, 3 months to 11.7 years) following the repeat reduction mammaplasty. In the repeat breast reduction, where nipple-areola complex transposition is planned, the initial pedicle should be reused to maintain nipple-areola complex perfusion. Where the initial pedicle is not known, a free nipple graft may be the safest option. In patients with pseudoptosis, in whom the nipple does not require transposition, an inferior wedge of tissue can be safely excised, irrespective of the initial pedicle.     

Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy

Current options in reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy include amputation with free-nipple graft as well as the inferior pedicle and bipedicle techniques. Complications of these procedures include nipple-areola necrosis, insensitivity, and hypopigmentation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty can minimize these complications. Twenty-three patients with severe mammary hypertrophy were studied. The medial pedicle successfully transposed the nipple-areola complex in 44 of 45 breasts (98 percent). Mean change in nipple position was 17.1 cm, and mean weight of tissue removed was 1604 g per breast. Nipple-areola sensation was retained in 43 of 44 breasts (98 percent) using a medial pedicle. Hypopigmentation was not observed, and central breast projection was restored in all patients. This study has demonstrated that medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty is a safe and reliable technique and should be given primary consideration in cases of severe mammary hypertrophy.     

Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques

The preservation of sensitivity within the nipple-areola complex is of paramount importance to patients presenting for reconstructive and aesthetic breast procedures. Previous attempts to measure sensation in the breast before and after surgery have relied primarily on the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, which is an imprecise study that measures the logarithm of force necessary to bend a series of six to 20 filaments. Within the last 10 years, various authors have published normative pressure threshold data for the breast that have varied by a magnitude of greater than 10-fold. Recently, precise anatomic studies have been performed that have elucidated the innervation of the nipple-areola complex medially and laterally from cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. Despite this knowledge, no quantitative sensibility studies have yet been performed that compare postoperative sensation when medially versus laterally innervated pedicles have been used in reduction mammaplasty. The present study is the first to use computer-assisted neurosensory testing to generate normal breast sensation data and to compare sensory outcomes between the inferior and the medial pedicle techniques of reduction mammaplasty.A total of 34 patients were divided into four groups and underwent breast sensory testing (67 breasts total) using the Pressure-Specified Sensory Device, a computer-assisted force transducer that measures static and moving one and two-point discrimination. Sensation in the nipple and in the four quadrants of the areola was measured. Groups I and II were composed of 17 unoperated controls with breast sizes ranging from 34A to 36C (group I; 18 breasts) and 36DD to 46EE (group II; 16 breasts) who presented to a general plastic surgery clinic. Groups III and IV were composed of 17 patients who underwent either medial or inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty between July of 1997 and March of 1999. Pressure thresholds in the most sensitive breasts were as low as 0.3 g/mm2, a marked contrast to data from previous studies using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments documenting the lowest recordable pressure threshold as greater than 2 g/mm2. Several findings from previous studies using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing were confirmed in unoperated controls, including an inverse relationship between sensitivity and breast size, superior nipple sensitivity when compared with the areola, and significant interpatient variability with respect to static and moving two-point discrimination among women matched according to age and breast size. When comparing medial with inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty patients, it was found that despite significantly greater reductions using the medial pedicle technique (mean of 1.7 kg versus 1.1 kg of breast tissue removed), there were no significant differences in postoperative sensory outcomes in the sample size of 17 patients. Furthermore, within each group of patients undergoing either the medial or inferior pedicle technique, the amount of breast tissue removed did not correlate with postoperative sensory outcomes.Computer-assisted quantitative neurosensory testing is a highly accurate technique for measuring sensibility. The use of this technology demonstrates a 10-fold difference in measurable sensory thresholds in normal patients from preexisting data using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Advances in measurement methods have allowed the authors to compare postoperative sensory outcomes reliably using two popular techniques of reduction mammaplasty.     

Construction of the nipple with a mushroom-shaped pedicle

Construction of the nipple-areolar complex has been the subject of much interest and many papers. We believe that the best way to ensure nipple protrusion is by the entrapment of tissue above the skin surface so that it cannot retract. This, in principle, is similar to creating an irreducible hernia. This technique for nipple construction employs a circular split-thickness island of skin which has its central circulation preserved through its attachment at the new nipple site. This central stalk represents about one-quarter of the total surface area of the constructed areola. The total diameter of the areolar disk is usually determined by the size of the opposite nipple-areolar complex. The new areola is developed from a full-thickness skin graft taken from the area below the inguinal crease. Once removed, it is sutured over the elevated nipple segment with its central island. The full-thickness graft is sutured into place before a small cruciate incision is made in the center. It should be just large enough to permit the delivery of the dermal-epidermal flap on its stalk up through the opening. Nothing more need be done to the raw undersurface of the split-thickness skin. Its raw surface has no place to reattach because its bed is now covered with the full-thickness graft.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Quantification of Regional Breast Density in Four Quadrants Using 3D MRI—A Pilot Study

PURPOSE: This study presented a three-dimensional magnetic resonance (MR)–based method to separate a breast into four quadrants for quantitative measurements of the quadrant breast volume (BV) and density. METHODS: Breast MR images from 58 healthy women were studied. The breast and the fibroglandular tissue were segmented by using a computer-based algorithm. A breast was divided into four quadrants using two perpendicular planes intersecting at the nipple or the nipple-centroid line. After the separation, the BV, the fibroglandular tissue volume, and the percent density (PD) were calculated. The symmetry of the quadrant BV in the left and right breasts separated by using the nipple alone, or the nipple-centroid line, was compared. RESULTS: The quadrant separation made on the basis of the nipple-centroid line showed closer BVs in four quadrants than using the nipple alone. The correlation and agreement for the BV in corresponding quadrants of the left and the right breasts were improved after the nipple-centroid reorientation. Among the four quadrants, PD was the highest in the lower outer and the lowest in the upper outer (significant than the other three) quadrants (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We presented a quantitative method to divide a breast into four quadrants. The reorientation based on the nipple-centroid line improved the left to right quadrant symmetry, and this may provide a better standardized method to measure quantitative quadrant density. The cancer occurrence rates are known to vary in different sites of a breast, and our method may provide a tool for investigating its association with the quantitative breast density.     

Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction

Reconstruction of the nipple is the penultimate step in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A number of reconstructive techniques have been described for nipple reconstruction including skin grafts, composite grafts, and various local flaps. The authors' preferred reconstructive technique is the local C-V or modified star flap. This flap produces an excellent reconstruction, but it is dependent on underlying subcutaneous fat to provide bulk to the reconstructed nipple. In most instances, the subcutaneous tissue is adequate. However, under certain circumstances, the subcutaneous fat may be insufficient to produce a nipple of adequate projection. Two cases of bilateral nipple reconstruction after soft-tissue expansion and implant placement and subsequent nipple reconstruction with local flaps provided inadequate nipple projection. These instances, as well as a retrospective review of reconstructed nipples after mound restoration using a variety of techniques, led the authors to conclude that a more predictable alternative to sustain nipple projection was necessary. The authors identified two broad categories of breast reconstruction patients in whom this new technique would be beneficial. In the first category of patients, breast mounds are reconstructed with tissue expansion and implant insertion, and in the second category, breast mounds are reconstructed by any technique in which the nipple reconstruction subsequently flattens. This article describes the indications, techniques, and experience in 13 patients treated over a 10-month period with fat grafting for nipple reconstruction.