Distinct functional classes of ram mutations in 16S rRNA

During decoding, the ribosome selects the correct (cognate) aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) from a large pool of incorrect aa-tRNAs through a two-stage mechanism. In the initial selection stage, aa-tRNA is delivered to the ribosome as part of a ternary complex with elongation factor EF-Tu and GTP. Interactions between codon and anticodon lead to activation of the GTPase domain of EF-Tu and GTP hydrolysis. Then, in the proofreading stage, aa-tRNA is released from EF-Tu and either moves fully into the A/A site (a step termed “accommodation”) or dissociates from the ribosome. Cognate codon-anticodon pairing not only stabilizes aa-tRNA at both stages of decoding but also stimulates GTP hydrolysis and accommodation, allowing the process to be both accurate and fast. In previous work, we isolated a number of ribosomal ambiguity (ram) mutations in 16S rRNA, implicating particular regions of the ribosome in the mechanism of decoding. Here, we analyze a representative subset of these mutations with respect to initial selection, proofreading, RF2-dependent termination, and overall miscoding in various contexts. We find that mutations that disrupt inter-subunit bridge B8 increase miscoding in a general way, causing defects in both initial selection and proofreading. Mutations in or near the A site behave differently, increasing miscoding in a codon-anticodon-dependent manner. These latter mutations may create spurious favorable interactions in the A site for certain near-cognate aa-tRNAs, providing an explanation for their context-dependent phenotypes in the cell.     

The ternary complex of aminoacylated tRNA and EF-Tu-GTP. Recognition of a bond and a fold

The refined crystal structure of the ternary complex of yeast Phe-tRNA^Phe, Thermus aquaticus elongation factor EF-Tu and the non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, GDPNP, revelas many details of the EF-Tu recognition of aminoacylated tRNA (aa-tRNA). EF-Tu-GTP recognizes the aminoacyl bond and one side of the backbone fold of the acceptor helix and has a high affinity for all ordinary elongator aa-tRNAs by binding to this aa-tRNA motif. Yet, the binding of deacylated tRNA, initiator tRNA, and selenocysteine-specific tRNA (tRNA^Sec) is effectively discriminated against. Subtle rearrangements of the binding pocket may occur to optimize the fit to any side chain of the aminoacyl group and interactions with EF-Tu stabilize the 3′-aminoacyl isomer of aa-tRNA. A general complementarity is observed in the location of the binding sites in tRNA for synthetases and for EF-Tu. The complex formation is highly specific for the GTP-bound conformation of EF-Tu, which can explain the effects of various mutants.     

Fluorescence characterization of the interaction of various transfer RNA species with elongation factor Tu.GTP: evidence for a new functional role for elongation factor Tu in protein biosynthesis

The ubiquity of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu)-dependent conformational changes in amino-acyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) and the origin of the binding energy associated with aa-tRNA.EF-Tu.GTP ternary complex formation have been examined spectroscopically. Fluorescein was attached covalently to the 4-thiouridine base at position 8 (s4U-8) in each of four elongator tRNAs (Ala, Met-m, Phe, and Val). Although the probes were chemically identical, their emission intensities in the free aa-tRNAs differed by nearly 3-fold, indicating that the dyes were in different environments and hence that the aa-tRNAs had different tertiary structures near s4U-8. Upon association with EF-Tu.GTP, the emission intensities increased by 244%, 57%, or 15% for three aa-tRNAs due to a change in tRNA conformation; the fourth aa-tRNA exhibited no fluorescence change upon binding to EF-Tu.GTP. Despite the great differences in the emission intensities of the free aa-tRNAs and in the magnitudes of their EF-Tu-dependent intensity increases, the emission intensity per aa-tRNA molecule was nearly the same (within 9% of the average) for the four aa-tRNAs when bound to EF-Tu-GTP. Thus, the binding of EF-Tu.GTP induced or selected a tRNA conformation near s4U-8 that was very similar, and possibly the same, for each aa-tRNA species. It therefore appears that EF-Tu functions, at least in part, by minimizing the conformational diversity in aa-tRNAs prior to their beginning the recognition and binding process at the single decoding site on the ribosome. Since an EF-Tu-dependent fluorescence change was also observed with fluorescein-labeled tRNA(Phe), the protein-dependent structural change is effected by direct interactions between EF-Tu and the tRNA and does not require the aminoacyl group. The Kd of the tRNA(Phe).EF-Tu.GTP ternary complex was determined, at equilibrium, to be 2.6 microM by the ability of the unacylated tRNA to compete with fluorescent Phe-tRNA for binding to the protein. Comparison of this Kd with that of the Phe-tRNA ternary complex showed that in this case the aminoacyl moiety contributed 4.3 kcal/mol toward ternary complex formation at 6 degrees C but that the bulk of the binding energy in the ternary complex was derived from direct protein-tRNA interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The reaction of ribosomes with elongation factor Tu.GTP complexes. Aminoacyl-tRNA-independent reactions in the elongation cycle determine the accuracy of protein synthesis

The fidelity of protein synthesis depends on the rate constants for the reaction of ribosomes with ternary complexes of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), GTP, and aminoacyl (aa)-tRNA. By measuring the rate constants for the reaction of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes with a binary complex of elongation factor (EF-Tu) and GTP we have shown that two of the key rate constants in the former reaction are determined exclusively by ribosome-EF-Tu interactions and are not affected by the aa-tRNA. These are the rate constant for GTP hydrolysis, which plays an important role in the fidelity of ternary complex selection by the ribosome, and the rate constant for EF-Tu.GDP dissociation from the ribosome, which plays an equally important role in subsequent proofreading of the aa-tRNA. We conclude that the fidelities of ternary complex selection and proofreading are fundamentally dependent on ribosome-EF-Tu interactions. These interactions determine the absolute value of the rate constants for GTP hydrolysis and EF-Tu.GDP dissociation. The ribosome then uses these rate constants as internal standards to measure, respectively, the rate constants for ternary complex and aa-tRNA dissociation from the ribosome. These rates, in turn, are highly dependent on whether the ternary complex and aa-tRNA are cognate or near-cognate to the codon being translated.     

Binding of misacylated tRNAs to the ribosomal A site

To test whether the ribosome displays specificity for the esterified amino acid and the tRNA body of an aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), the stabilities of 4 correctly acylated and 12 misacylated tRNAs in the ribosomal A site were determined. By introducing the GAC (valine) anticodon into each tRNA, a constant anticodon.codon interaction was maintained, thus removing concern that different anticodon.codon strengths might affect the binding of the different aa-tRNAs to the A site. Surprisingly, all 16 aa-tRNAs displayed similar dissociation rate constants from the A site. These results suggest that either the ribosome is not specific for different amino acids and tRNA bodies when intact aa-tRNAs are used or the specificity for the amino acid side chain and tRNA body is masked by a conformational change upon aa-tRNA release.     

Dynamics of Recognition between tRNA and elongation factor Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) binds to all standard aminoacyl transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) and transports them to the ribosome while protecting the ester linkage between the tRNA and its cognate amino acid. We use molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the dynamics of the EF-Tu·guanosine 5′-triphosphate·aa-tRNA^Cys complex and the roles played by Mg²⁺ ions and modified nucleosides on the free energy of protein·RNA binding. Individual modified nucleosides have pronounced effects on the structural dynamics of tRNA and the EF-Tu·Cys-tRNA^Cys interface. Combined energetic and evolutionary analyses identify the coevolution of residues in EF-Tu and aa-tRNAs at the binding interface. Highly conserved EF-Tu residues are responsible for both attracting aa-tRNAs as well as providing nearby nonbonded repulsive energies that help fine-tune molecular attraction at the binding interface. In addition to the 3′ CCA end, highly conserved tRNA nucleotides G1, G52, G53, and U54 contribute significantly to EF-Tu binding energies. Modification of U54 to thymine affects the structure of the tRNA common loop resulting in a change in binding interface contacts. In addition, other nucleotides, conserved within certain tRNA specificities, may be responsible for tuning aa-tRNA binding to EF-Tu. The trend in EF-Tu·Cys-tRNA^Cys binding energies observed as the result of mutating the tRNA agrees with experimental observation. We also predict variations in binding free energies upon misacylation of tRNA^Cys with d-cysteine or O-phosphoserine and upon changing the protonation state of l-cysteine. Principal components analysis in each case reveals changes in the communication network across the protein·tRNA interface and is the basis for the entropy calculations.     

EF-Tu dynamics during pre-translocation complex formation: EF-Tu·GDP exits the ribosome via two different pathways

The G-protein EF-Tu, which undergoes a major conformational change when EF-Tu·GTP is converted to EF-Tu·GDP, forms part of an aminoacyl(aa)-tRNA·EF-Tu·GTP ternary complex (TC) that accelerates the binding of aa-tRNA to the ribosome during peptide elongation. Such binding, placing a portion of EF-Tu in contact with the GTPase Associated Center (GAC), is followed by GTP hydrolysis and P_i release, and results in formation of a pretranslocation (PRE) complex. Although tRNA movement through the ribosome during PRE complex formation has been extensively studied, comparatively little is known about the dynamics of EF-Tu interaction with either the ribosome or aa-tRNA. Here we examine these dynamics, utilizing ensemble and single molecule assays employing fluorescent labeled derivatives of EF-Tu, tRNA, and the ribosome to measure changes in either FRET efficiency or fluorescence intensity during PRE complex formation. Our results indicate that ribosome-bound EF-Tu separates from the GAC prior to its full separation from aa-tRNA, and suggest that EF-Tu·GDP dissociates from the ribosome by two different pathways. These pathways correspond to either reversible EF-Tu·GDP dissociation from the ribosome prior to the major conformational change in EF-Tu that follows GTP hydrolysis, or irreversible dissociation after or concomitant with this conformational change.     

Incorporation of aminoacyl-tRNA into the ribosome as seen by cryo-electron microscopy

Aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) are delivered to the ribosome as part of the ternary complex of aa-tRNA, elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) study, at a resolution of approximately 9 A, showing that during the incorporation of the aa-tRNA into the 70S ribosome of Escherichia coli, the flexibility of aa-tRNA allows the initial codon recognition and its accommodation into the ribosomal A site. In addition, a conformational change observed in the GTPase-associated center (GAC) of the ribosomal 50S subunit may provide the mechanism by which the ribosome promotes a relative movement of the aa-tRNA with respect to EF-Tu. This relative rearrangement seems to facilitate codon recognition by the incoming aa-tRNA, and to provide the codon-anticodon recognition-dependent signal for the GTPase activity of EF-Tu. From these new findings we propose a mechanism that can explain the sequence of events during the decoding of mRNA on the ribosome.     

Guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) as an analog of GTP in protein biosynthesis. The effects of temperature and polycations on the accuracy of initial recognition of aminoacyl-tRNA ternary complexes by ribosomes

Guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) is a good analog of GTP in the reactions leading to the formation of a peptide bond in protein biosynthesis. It forms binary and ternary complexes with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), and with EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA). In addition, it stimulates aa-tRNA binding to ribosomes. Although GTP gamma S hydrolysis is more than three orders of magnitude slower than GTP hydrolysis, both reactions are dependent on the formation of a noncovalent complex (RS X TC) between mRNA-programmed ribosomes and ternary complex, and the complexes resulting from that hydrolysis are intermediates in peptide formation. The rate of dissociation of the ribosome X EF-Tu X GTP gamma S X aa-tRNA complex was determined from the rate of labeled peptide formation in the presence of an unlabeled ternary complex chase. This rate (2.2 X 10(-3) s-1) is similar to that determined previously (Thompson, R.C., and Karim, A.M. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 4922-4926) from the progress of GTP gamma S hydrolysis. The effects of temperature and polycation concentration on this rate constant and that for GTP gamma S hydrolysis are reported. The rate constants measured are consistent with a kinetic rather than thermodynamic limit on the accuracy of the aa-tRNA selection in vivo.     

Streptomycin interferes with conformational coupling between codon recognition and GTPase activation on the ribosome

Aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) are selected by the ribosome through a kinetically controlled induced fit mechanism. Cognate codon recognition induces a conformational change in the decoding center and a domain closure of the 30S subunit. We studied how these global structural rearrangements are related to tRNA discrimination by using streptomycin to restrict the conformational flexibility of the 30S subunit. The antibiotic stabilized aa-tRNA on the ribosome both with a cognate and with a near-cognate codon in the A site. Streptomycin altered the rates of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) on cognate and near-cognate codons, resulting in almost identical rates of GTP hydrolysis and virtually complete loss of selectivity. These results indicate that movements within the 30S subunit at the streptomycin-binding site are essential for the coupling between base pair recognition and GTP hydrolysis, thus modulating the fidelity of aa-tRNA selection.     

Ribosome interactions of aminoacyl-tRNA and elongation factor Tu in the codon-recognition complex

The mRNA codon in the ribosomal A-site is recognized by aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) in a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. Here we report the 13 A resolution three-dimensional reconstruction determined by cryo-electron microscopy of the kirromycin-stalled codon-recognition complex. The structure of the ternary complex is distorted by binding of the tRNA anticodon arm in the decoding center. The aa-tRNA interacts with 16S rRNA, helix 69 of 23S rRNA and proteins S12 and L11, while the sarcin-ricin loop of 23S rRNA contacts domain 1 of EF-Tu near the nucleotide-binding pocket. These results provide a detailed snapshot view of an important functional state of the ribosome and suggest mechanisms of decoding and GTPase activation.     

The elongation factor Tu from Escherichia coli, aminoacyl-tRNA, and guanosine tetraphosphate form a ternary complex which is bound by programmed ribosomes

The interaction of the Escherichia coli elongation factor Tu guanosine tetraphosphate complex (EF-Tu ppGpp) with aminoacyl-tRNAs(aa-tRNA) was reinvestigated by gel filtration and hydrolysis protection experiments. These experiments show that EF-Tu X ppGpp like EF-Tu X GDP (Pingoud, A., Block, W., Wittinghofer, A., Wolf, H. & Fischer, E. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 11261-11267) forms a fairly stable complex with Phe-tRNAPhe, KAss being 0.6 X 10(5) M-1 at 25 degrees C. The binding of the EF-Tu X ppGpp X aa-tRNA complex to programmed ribosomes was investigated by a centrifugation technique. It is shown that this complex is bound codon-specific with KAss = 3 X 10(7) M-1 at 0 degrees C and that it stimulates peptidyl transfer. A numerical estimation of the intracellular concentration of EF-Tu X GTP X aa-tRNA and EF-Tu X ppGpp X aa-tRNA during normal growth and under the stringent response indicates that ppGpp accumulation does affect the EF-Tu X GTP X aa-tRNA concentration but does not lead to major depletion of this pool. Furthermore, due to the higher affinity of EF-Tu X GTP to aa-tRNA and of the ternary complex EF-Tu X GTP X aa-tRNA to the ribosome, EF-Tu X ppGpp X aa-tRNA binding to the ribosome is not significant. According to our measurements and calculations, therefore, a direct participation of EF-Tu in slowing down the rate of protein biosynthesis and improving its accuracy during amino acid starvation is not obvious.     

Thiostrepton inhibition of tRNA delivery to the ribosome

Ribosome-stimulated hydrolysis of guanosine-5'-triphosphate (GTP) by guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) translation factors drives protein synthesis by the ribosome. Allosteric coupling of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) at the ribosomal GTPase center to messenger RNA (mRNA) codon:aminoacyl-transfer RNA (aa-tRNA) anticodon recognition at the ribosomal decoding site is essential for accurate and rapid aa-tRNA selection. Here we use single-molecule methods to investigate the mechanism of action of the antibiotic thiostrepton and show that the GTPase center of the ribosome has at least two discrete functions during aa-tRNA selection: binding of EF-Tu(GTP) and stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by the factor. We separate these two functions of the GTPase center and assign each to distinct, conserved structural regions of the ribosome. The data provide a specific model for the coupling between the decoding site and the GTPase center during aa-tRNA selection as well as a general mechanistic model for ribosome-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by GTPase translation factors.     

Effects of the mutation glycine-222----aspartic acid on the functions of elongation factor Tu

We have studied the properties of a mutant elongation factor Tu, encoded by tufB (EF-TuBo), in which Gly-222 is replaced by Asp. For its purification from the kirromycin-resistant EF-Tu encoded by tufA (EF-TuAr), a method was developed by exploiting the different affinities to kirromycin of the two factors and the competition between kirromycin and elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) for binding to EF-Tu. The resulting EF-TuBo kirromycin and EF-TuAr EF-Ts complexes are separated by chromatography on diethylaminoethyl-Sephadex A-50. For the first time we have succeeded in obtaining a tufB product in homogeneous form. Compared with wild-type EF-Tu, EF-TuBo displays essentially the same affinity for GDP and GTP, with only the dissociation rate of EF-Tu GTP being slightly faster. Protection of amino-acyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) against nonenzymatic deacylation by different EF-Tu species indicates that conformational alterations occur in the ternary complex EF-TuBo GTP aa-tRNA. However, the most dramatic modification is found in the EF-TuBo interaction with the ribosome. Its activity in poly(Phe) synthesis as well as in the GTPase activity associated with the interaction of its ternary complex with the ribosome mRNA complex requires higher Mg2+ concentrations than wild-type EF-Tu (Mg2+ optimum at 10-14 vs. 6 mM), even if EF-TuBo can sustain enzymatic binding of aa-tRNA to ribosomes at low Mg2+. The anomalous behavior of EF-TuBo is reflected in a remarkable increase of the fidelity in poly(Phe) synthesis, especially at high Mg2+ concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Recognition and selection of tRNA in translation

Aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) is delivered to the ribosome in a ternary complex with elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and GTP. The stepwise movement of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu into the ribosomal A site entails a number of intermediates. The ribosome recognizes aa-tRNA through shape discrimination of the codon-anticodon duplex and regulates the rates of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu and aa-tRNA accommodation in the A site by an induced fit mechanism. Recent results of kinetic measurements, ribosome crystallography, single molecule FRET measurements, and cryo-electron microscopy suggest the mechanism of tRNA recognition and selection.     

Structural insights into cognate versus near-cognate discrimination during decoding

The structural basis of the tRNA selection process is investigated by cryo-electron microscopy of ribosomes programmed with UGA codons and incubated with ternary complex (TC) containing the near-cognate Trp-tRNA(Trp) in the presence of kirromycin. Going through more than 350 000 images and employing image classification procedures, we find ～8% in which the TC is bound to the ribosome. The reconstructed 3D map provides a means to characterize the arrangement of the near-cognate aa-tRNA with respect to elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and the ribosome, as well as the domain movements of the ribosome. One of the interesting findings is that near-cognate tRNA's acceptor stem region is flexible and CCA end becomes disordered. The data bring direct structural insights into the induced-fit mechanism of decoding by the ribosome, as the analysis of the interactions between small and large ribosomal subunit, aa-tRNA and EF-Tu and comparison with the cognate case (UGG codon) offers clues on how the conformational signals conveyed to the GTPase differ in the two cases.     

Mechanism of the chemical step for the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis catalyzed by elongation factor Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), the protein responsible for delivering aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) to ribosomal A site during translation, belongs to the group of guanosine-nucleotide (GTP/GDP) binding proteins. Its active 'on'-state corresponds to the GTP-bound form, while the inactive 'off'-state corresponds to the GDP-bound form. In this work we focus on the chemical step, GTP+H(2)O-->GDP+Pi, of the hydrolysis mechanism. We apply molecular modeling tools including molecular dynamics simulations and the combined quantum mechanical-molecular mechanical calculations for estimates of reaction energy profiles for two possible arrangements of switch II regions of EF-Tu. In the first case we presumably mimic binding of the ternary complex EF-Tu.GTP.aa-tRNA to the ribosome and allow the histidine (His85) side chain of the protein to approach the reaction active site. In the second case, corresponding to the GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu alone, the side chain of His85 stays away from the active site, and the chemical reaction GTP+H(2)O-->GDP+Pi proceeds without participation of the histidine but through water molecules. In agreement with the experimental observations which distinguish rate constants for the fast chemical reaction in EF-Tu.GTP.aa-tRNA.ribosome and the slow spontaneous GTP hydrolysis in EF-Tu, we show that the activation energy barrier for the first scenario is considerably lower compared to that of the second case.     

Direct determination of the association constant between elongation factor Tu X GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA using fluorescence

We have investigated the formation of the aa-tRNA X EF-Tu X GTP ternary complex spectroscopically by monitoring a fluorescence change that accompanies the association of EF-Tu X GTP with Phe-tRNAPhe-F8, a functionally active analogue of Phe-tRNAPhe with a fluorescein moiety covalently attached to the s4U-8 base. With this approach, the protein-nucleic acid interaction could be examined by direct means and at equilibrium. The fluorescence emission intensity of each Phe-tRNAPhe-F8 increased by 36-55% upon association with EF-Tu X GTP, depending on the solvent conditions. Thus, when Phe-tRNAPhe-F8 was titrated with EF-Tu X GTP, the extent of ternary complex formation was determined from the increase in emission intensity. A nonlinear least-squares analysis of the titration data yielded a dissociation constant of 0.85 nM for the ternary complex in 50 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid (pH 7.6), 10 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM NH4Cl, at 6 degrees C. The delta H degrees of this interaction, determined by the temperature dependence of Kd, was -16 kcal/mol; the delta S degrees was therefore -16 cal mol-1 deg-1 at 6 degrees C in this buffer. In a more physiological polycation-containing solvent ("polymix"), the Kd was 4.7 nM. The ionic strength dependence of ternary complex formation showed that a minimum of two salt bridges and a substantial nonelectrostatic contribution are involved in the binding of aa-tRNA to EF-Tu. The affinities of unmodified aa-tRNAs for EF-Tu X GTP were determined by their abilities to compete with the fluorescent aa-tRNA for binding to the protein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

O6-Methylguanosine leads to position-dependent effects on ribosome speed and fidelity

Nucleic acids are under constant assault from endogenous and environmental agents that alter their physical and chemical properties. O6-methylation of guanosine (m⁶G) is particularly notable for its high mutagenicity, pairing with T, during DNA replication. Yet, while m⁶G accumulates in both DNA and RNA, little is known about its effects on RNA. Here, we investigate the effects of m⁶G on the decoding process, using a reconstituted bacterial translation system. m⁶G at the first and third position of the codon decreases the accuracy of tRNA selection. The ribosome readily incorporates near-cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) by forming m⁶G-uridine codon–anticodon pairs. Surprisingly, the introduction of m⁶G to the second position of the codon does not promote miscoding, but instead slows the observed rates of peptide-bond formation by >1000-fold for cognate aa-tRNAs without altering the rates for near-cognate aa-tRNAs. These in vitro observations were recapitulated in eukaryotic extracts and HEK293 cells. Interestingly, the analogous modification N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) at the second position has only a minimal effect on tRNA selection, suggesting that the effects on tRNA selection seen with m⁶G are due to altered geometry of the base pair. Given that the m6G:U base pair is predicted to be nearly indistinguishable from a Watson-Crick base pair, our data suggest that the decoding center of the ribosome is extremely sensitive to changes at the second position. Our data, apart from highlighting the deleterious effects that these adducts pose to cellular fitness, shed new insight into decoding and the process by which the ribosome recognizes codon–anticodon pairs.