RNA polyadenylation and degradation in cyanobacteria are similar to the chloroplast but different from Escherichia coli

The mechanism of RNA degradation in Escherichia coli involves endonucleolytic cleavage, polyadenylation of the cleavage product by poly(A) polymerase, and exonucleolytic degradation by the exoribonucleases, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and RNase II. The poly(A) tails are homogenous, containing only adenosines in most of the growth conditions. In the chloroplast, however, the same enzyme, PNPase, polyadenylates and degrades the RNA molecule; there is no equivalent for the E. coli poly(A) polymerase enzyme. Because cyanobacteria is a prokaryote believed to be related to the evolutionary ancestor of the chloroplast, we asked whether the molecular mechanism of RNA polyadenylation in the Synechocystis PCC6803 cyanobacteria is similar to that in E. coli or the chloroplast. We found that RNA polyadenylation in Synechocystis is similar to that in the chloroplast but different from E. coli. No poly(A) polymerase enzyme exists, and polyadenylation is performed by PNPase, resulting in heterogeneous poly(A)-rich tails. These heterogeneous tails were found in the amino acid coding region, the 5' and 3' untranslated regions of mRNAs, as well as in rRNA and the single intron located at the tRNA(fmet). Furthermore, unlike E. coli, the inactivation of PNPase or RNase II genes caused lethality. Together, our results show that the RNA polyadenylation and degradation mechanisms in cyanobacteria and chloroplast are very similar to each other but different from E. coli.     

Effect of isonicotinic acid hydrazide-copper complex on Rous sarcoma virus and its genome RNA.

The copper complex of the antituberculous drug, insonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH), inhibits the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase of Rous sarcoma virus and inactivates its ability to malignantly transform chick embryo cells. The INH-copper complex binds to the 70S genome RNA of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), which may account for its ability to inhibit the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase. The complex binds RNA more effectively than DNA in contrast to M-IBT-copper complexes, which bind both types of nucleic acids equally. The homopolymers, poly rA and poly rU, are bound by the INH-copper complex to a greater extent than poly rC. Isonicotinic acid hydrazide alone and CuSO4 alone bind neither DNA, RNA, poly (rA), poly (rU), nor poly (rC). However, CuSO4 alone binds poly (rI); INH alone does not. In addition to viral DNA synthesis, chick-embryo cell DNA synthesis is inhibited by the INH-copper complex. The extent of inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis is greater than that of cellular RNA and protein synthesis. No selective inhibition of transformation in cells previously infected with Rous sarcoma virus is observed.     

Purification and partial characterization of megamodulin, a heat-stable protein factor from E. coli and its stimulatory effect on RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Megamodulin, a heat-stable protein from Escherichia coli was isolated and purified near homogeneity as determined by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. It had a molecular weight of 71,000 and pl between 3.5 and 4.0. This factor stimulated E. coli RNA polymerase 71-fold in the presence of a synthetic template such as poly (rA).p(dT). When TATAAA sequence was used as template, the RNA polymerase activity was increased 68 times by this factor. The possible mechanism by which this protein factor may regulate the RNA polymerase activity has been described.     

RNA quality control: degradation of defective transfer RNA

The distinction between stable (tRNA and rRNA) and unstable (mRNA) RNA has been considered an important feature of bacterial RNA metabolism. One factor thought to contribute to the difference between these RNA populations is polyadenylation, which promotes degradation of unstable RNA. However, the recent discovery that polyadenylation also occurs on stable RNA led us to examine whether poly(A) might serve as a signal for eliminating defective stable RNAs, and thus play a role in RNA quality control. Here we show that a readily denaturable, mutant tRNA(Trp) does not accumulate to normal levels in Escherichia coli because its precursor is rapidly degraded. Degradation is largely dependent on polyadenylation of the precursor by poly(A) polymerase and on its removal by polynucleotide phosphorylase. Thus, in the absence of these two enzymes large amounts of tRNA(Trp) precursor accumulate. We propose that defective stable RNA precursors that are poorly converted to their mature forms may be polyadenylated and subsequently degraded. These data indicate that quality control of stable RNA metabolism in many ways resembles normal turnover of unstable RNA.     

Thermodynamics of nucleic acid "shape readout" by an aminosugar

Recognition of nucleic acids is important for our understanding of nucleic acid structure as well as for our understanding of nucleic acid-protein interactions. In addition to the direct readout mechanisms of nucleic acids such as H-bonding, shape recognition of nucleic acids is being increasingly recognized as playing an equally important role in DNA recognition. Competition dialysis, UV, flourescent intercalator displacement (FID), computational docking, and calorimetry studies were conducted to study the interaction of neomycin with a variety of nucleic acid conformations (shapes). At pH 5.5, the results suggest the following. (1) Neomycin binds three RNA structures [16S A site rRNA, poly(rA)·poly(rA), and poly(rA)·poly(rU)] with high affinities (K(a) ~ 10(7) M(-1)). (2) The binding of neomycin to A-form GC-rich oligomer d(A(2)G(15)C(15)T(2))(2) has an affinity comparable to those of RNA structures. (3) The binding of neomycin to DNA·RNA hybrids shows a 3-fold variance that can be attributed to their structural differences [for poly(dA)·poly(rU), K(a) = 9.4 × 10(6) M(-1), and for poly(rA)·poly(dT), K(a) = 3.1 × 10(6) M(-1)]. (4) The interaction of neomycin with DNA triplex poly(dA)·2poly(dT) yields a binding affinity (K(a)) of 2.4 × 10(5) M(-1). (5) Poly(dA-dT)(2) shows the lowest association constant for all nucleic acids studied (K(a) < 10(5)). (6) Neomycin binds to G-quadruplexes with K(a) values of ~10(4)-10(5) M(-1). (7) Computational studies show that the decrease in major groove width in the B to A transition correlates with increasing neomycin affinity. Neomycin's affinity for various nucleic acid structures can be ranked as follows: RNAs and GC-rich d(A(2)G(15)C(15)T(2))(2) structures > poly(dA)·poly(rU) > poly(rA)·poly(dT) > T·A-T triplex, G-quadruplex, B-form AT-rich, or GC-rich DNA sequences. The results illustrate the first example of a small molecule-based "shape readout" of different nucleic acid conformations.     

Spermine Condenses DNA,but Not RNA Duplexes

Interactions between the polyamine spermine and nucleic acids drive important cellular processes. Spermine condenses DNA and some RNAs, such as poly(rA):poly(rU). A large fraction of the spermine present in cells is bound to RNA but apparently does not condense it. Here, we study the effect of spermine binding to short duplex RNA and DNA, and compare our findings with predictions of molecular-dynamics simulations. When small numbers of spermine are introduced, RNA with a designed sequence containing a mixture of 14 GC pairs and 11 AU pairs resists condensation relative to DNA of an equivalent sequence or to 25 bp poly(rA):poly(rU) RNA. A comparison of wide-angle x-ray scattering profiles with simulation results suggests that spermine is sequestered deep within the major groove of mixed-sequence RNA. This prevents condensation by limiting opportunities to bridge to other molecules and stabilizes the RNA by locking it into a particular conformation. In contrast, for DNA, simulations suggest that spermine binds externally to the duplex, offering opportunities for intermolecular interaction. The goal of this study is to explain how RNA can remain soluble and available for interaction with other molecules in the cell despite the presence of spermine at concentrations high enough to precipitate DNA.     

Hydrogen exchange study of some polynucleotides and transfer RNA

The apparent disagreement between published transfer RNA hydrogen exchange results and the tRNA cloverleaf model, prompted a re-investigation of the relationship between hydrogen exchange data and nucleic acid structure. Hydrogen-tritium exchange experiments were carried out with samples of pure and mixed tRNA and with the synthetic polynucleotide bihelices: poly(rA) · poly(rU), poly(rI) · poly(rC), poly(rG) · poly(rC) and poly(dG) · poly (dC).