Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in solar salt ponds in Shark Bay,Western Australia

The aim of this research was to examine nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in solar salt ponds of varying salinity at Useless Inlet in Western Australia. These ponds use solar energy to evaporate seawater for the purpose of commercial salt production. A combination of techniques involving water column nutrient ratios, comparisons of nutrient concentrations to concentration of magnesium ions and bioassays were used in the investigation. Comparisons of changes in dissolved inorganic nitrogen to phosphorus ratios and concentrations of dissolved inorganic nutrients against changes in concentrations of the conservative cation Mg²⁺ indicated that phytoplankton biomass was potentially nitrogen limited along the entire pond salinity gradient. Nutrient addition bioassays indicated that in low salinity ponds, phytoplankton was nitrogen limited but in high salinity ponds, phosphorus limited. This may be due to isolation of phytoplankton in bioassay bottles from in situ conditions as well as to changes in phytoplankton species composition between ponds, and the variable availability of inorganic and organic nutrient sources. The differences in limiting nutrient between methods indicate that phytoplankton cells may be proximally limited by nutrients that are not theoretically limiting at the pond scale. Dissolved organic nutrients constituted a large proportion of total nutrients, with concentrations increasing through the pond sequence of increasing salinity. From the change in nutrient concentrations in bioassay bottles, sufficient dissolved organic nitrogen may be available for phytoplankton uptake in low salinity ponds, potentially alleviating the dissolved inorganic nitrogen limitation of phytoplankton biomass. Guest Editors: J. John & B. Timms Salt Lake Research: Biodiversity and Conservation—Selected Papers from the 9th Conference of the International Society for Salt Lake Research     

Nutrient limitation and algal blooms in urbanizing tidal creeks

Tidal creeks are commonly found in low energy systems on the East and Gulf Coasts of the United States, and are often subject to intense watershed human development. Many of these creeks are receiving urban and suburban runoff containing nutrients, among other pollutants. During the period 1993-2001, we studied three tidal creeks located in southeastern North Carolina, a rapidly urbanizing area. All three creeks received anthropogenic nutrient loading. Oligohaline to mesohaline stations in upper tidal creek regions had much higher nutrient (especially nitrate-N) concentrations than lower creek areas, and hosted spring and summer phytoplankton blooms that at times exceeded 200 μg chlorophyll a l⁻¹. Phytoplankton biomass during winter was low at all stations in all three creeks. Spring and summer nutrient addition bioassay experiments were conducted to characterize the nutrients limiting phytoplankton growth. Water from high salinity stations in all three creeks always showed significant positive responses to nitrate-N inputs, even at concentrations as low as 50 μg N l⁻¹. Low salinity stations in upper creek areas often showed significant responses to nitrate-N inputs, but on occasion showed sensitivity to phosphorus inputs as well, indicating the influence of anthropogenic nitrate loading. During several experiments, one of the upper stations showed no positive response to nutrient inputs, indicating that these stretches were nutrient replete, and further phytoplankton growth appeared to be light-limited either by phytoplankton self-shading or turbidity. Water from upper creek areas yielded much higher chlorophyll a concentrations in bioassay experiments than did lower creek water. In general, these urbanizing tidal creeks were shown to be very sensitive to nitrogen loading, and provide a physical environment conducive to phytoplankton bloom formation in nutrient-enriched areas. Tidal creeks are important ecological resources in that they are considered to be nursery areas for many species of fish and shellfish. To protect the ecological function of these small, but very abundant estuarine systems, management efforts should recognize their susceptibility to algal blooms and focus on control of nonpoint source nutrient inputs, especially nitrogen.     

An analysis,by bioassay,of the factors which limit algal growth in the P. K. le Roux Impoundment,Orange River,South Africa

Factors which limit algal growth in a turbid man-made impoundment were investigated using natural phytoplankton populations. Results indicate that light was the primary limiting factor with nutrients possibly limiting growth in the event of an increase in water transparency. These results differ from another study which used Selenastrum capricornutum bioassays of water from other areas of the Orange River. The value of natural phytoplankton bioassay techniques is supported.     

Nutrient limitation in Crater Lake,Oregon

Experiments were carried out to determine what nutrient (or nutrients) was primarily responsible for limiting phytoplankton productivity in ultraoligotrophic Crater Lake. The experiments included in situ and laboratory nutrient addition bioassays utilizing the natural phytoplankton community, Selenastrum capricornutum bottle assays, photosynthetic responses, photosynthetic carbon metabolism, and response of dark uptake of ¹⁴CO₂ with the addition of NH ₄ ⁺ . The results suggested that a trace metal(s) or its availability was the primary factor limiting the epilimnetic phytoplankton productivity. Nitrogen was extremely low, and quickly became limiting with the addition of trace metals and a chelator. Iron is the most likely candidate as the limiting nutrient. Trace metals and nitrogen are also both important in limiting phytoplankton at 100 m, a depth where biologically mediated turnover of nutrients seems to be more important.     

Nutrient pulsing as a regulator of phytoplankton abundance and community composition in Galveston Bay, Texas

Galveston Bay, Texas, is a large shallow estuary with a watershed that includes 60% of the major industrial facilities of Texas. However, the system exhibits low to moderate (2-20 μg l⁻¹) microalgal biomass with sporadic phytoplankton blooms. Both nitrogen (N) and phosphate (P) limitation of phytoplankton growth have been proposed for the estuary. However, shifts between N and P limitation of algae growth may occur due to annual fluctuations in nutrient concentrations. The primary goal of this work was to determine the primary limiting nutrient for phytoplankton in Galveston Bay. Nutrient addition bioassays were used to assess short-term (1-2 days) phytoplankton responses (both biomass and community composition) to potentially limiting nutrients. The experimental bioassays were conducted over an annual cycle using natural water collected from the center to lower part of the estuary. Total phytoplankton biomass increased in the nitrate (10 μM) additions in 11 of the 13 bioassays, but no significant increases were detected in the phosphate (3 μM)-only additions. Bioassay results suggest that the phytoplankton community was usually not phosphate limited. All major groups increased in biomass following nitrate additions but diatoms increased in biomass at a faster rate than other groups, shifting the community composition toward higher relative abundance of diatoms. The results of this study suggest that pulsed N input events preferentially favor increases in diatom biomass in this estuary. The broader implications of this study are that N pulsing events, primarily due to river discharge, play an important role in structuring the phytoplankton community in the Galveston Bay estuary.     

Use of a multiple addition bioassay to determine limiting nutrients in eagle lake,California

This investigation uses anin vitro enrichment bioassay (in which all essential nutrients except one are added to each culture) to determine which nutrients are important to algal growth in Eagle Lake. The technique was developed when it was discovered that addition of individual nutrients produced little if any growth response. Laboratory bioassays correlated well with comparative studies in the lake. A great deal of variation was found throughout the year but P, N, Fe, and S were found to be limiting at one time or another. The north and south basins of the lake, which differ in morphometry, were also found to differ in the intensity spectrum of limitation. While P was the most important nutrient in both basins, the other nutrients were more limiting in the north basin than the south, and Fe, which was least limiting in the south, was very important in the north. The multiple enrichment bioassay has several advantages over other bioassays. Supported in part by Research Corporation     

Response of three phytoplankton bioassay techniques in experimental ponds of known limiting nutrient

In a controlled enrichment study of eight experimental ponds, results from the batch bioassay, primary productivity incubation bioassay, and chemostat techniques for measuring limiting factors of phytoplankton algae were compared to the change in the natural system with nutrient addition. In the ponds, rapid and dramatic increase in both phytoplankton biomass and primary productivity upon the addition of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer offered conclusive evidence that these nutrients were limiting in the control ponds to which no nutrients were added. Both the batch bioassay and chemostat techniques clearly indicated nitrogen and possibly phosphorus as the limiting factors; however, the primary productivity incubation bioassay technique showed no increase in ¹⁴C uptake with addition of these nutrients. A species- and/or nutrient-specific time lag between nutrient uptake and increased carbon fixation is suggested to explain the failure of the technique to yield positive results within the 4-hour incubation period used.     

Alteration of phytoplankton phosphorus status during enrichment experiments: implications for interpreting nutrient enrichment bioassay results

We compared the results of phosphorus-enrichment bioassay experiments with alkaline phosphatase activity (APA) assays as indicators of phosphorus (P) limitation of in situ phytoplankton growth. In 4-d experiments, phytoplankton APA decreased or remained unchanged in P-enriched samples, but increased in unenriched samples, indicating a rapid alteration of the P status of the unenriched algae during the experimental incubations. In direct comparisons of enrichment bioassays and APA assays of reservoir phytoplankton samples, the results of the two methods corresponded in general, although contradictory results were not uncommon. Our data support the conclusion that enrichment experiments can indicate the potential for nutrient limitation of algal growth in the absence of other limiting factors, but do not necessarily demonstrate the occurrence of in situ nutrient limitation of phytoplankton production.     

Nutrient addition effects on chlorophyll a,phytoplankton biomass,and heterocyte formation in Lake Erie’s central basin during 2014–2017: Insights into diazotrophic blooms in high nitrogen water

1. Phosphorus (P) usually is the primary limiting nutrient of phytoplankton biomass, but attention towards nitrogen (N) and trace nutrients, such as iron (Fe), has surfaced. Additionally, N-fixing cyanobacterial blooms have been documented to occur in N-rich, P-poor waters, which is counterintuitive from the paradigm that low N and high P promotes blooms. For example, Lake Erie's central basin has Dolichospermum blooms when nitrate concentrations are high, which raises questions about which nutrient(s) are selecting for Dolichospermum over other phytoplankton and why an N-fixer is present in high N waters?
2. We conducted a 4-year (2014–2017) study in Lake Erie's central basin to determine which nutrient (P, N, or trace nutrients such as Fe, molybdenum [Mo], and boron [B]) constrained chlorophyll concentration, phytoplankton biovolume, and nitrate assimilation using nutrient enrichment bioassays. The enriched lake water was incubated in 1-L bottles in a growth chamber programmed at light and temperatures of in situ conditions for 4–7 days. We also quantified heterocytes when N-fixing cyanobacteria were present.
3. Compared to the non-enriched control, the P-enriched (+P) treatment had significantly higher chlorophyll and phytoplankton biovolume in c. 75% of experiments. Combination enrichments of P with ammonium-N, nitrate-N, Fe, Mo, and B were compared to the +P treatment to determine secondary limitations. +P and ammonium-N and +P nitrate-N resulted in higher chlorophyll in 50% of experiments but higher phytoplankton biovolume in only 25% of experiments. These results show that P was the primary limiting nutrient, but there were times when N was secondarily limiting.
4. Chlorophyll concentration indicated N secondary limitation in half of the experiments, but biovolume indicated only N secondary limitation in 25% of the experiments. To make robust conclusions from nutrient enrichment bioassays, both chlorophyll and phytoplankton biovolume should be measured.
5. The secondary effects of Fe, Mo, and B on chlorophyll were low (<26% of experiments), and no secondary effects were observed on phytoplankton biovolume and nitrate assimilation. However, +P and Fe resulted in more chlorophyll than +P in experiments conducted during Dolichospermum blooms, and +P and B significantly increased the number of heterocytes in Dolichospermum. These results indicate that low Fe availability might select for Dolichospermum, and low B constrains heterocyte formation in the central basin of Lake Erie. Furthermore, these results could apply to other lakes with high N and low P where diazotrophic cyanobacterial blooms occur.

     

Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton communities in Subarctic lakes and ponds in Wapusk National Park, Canada

We determined the limiting nutrient of phytoplankton in 21 lakes and ponds in Wapusk National Park, Canada, using nutrient enrichment bioassays to assess the response of natural phytoplankton communities to nitrogen and phosphorus additions. The goal was to determine whether these Subarctic lakes and ponds were nutrient (N or P) limited, and to improve the ability to predict future impacts of increased nutrient loading associated with climate change. We found that 38% of lakes were not limited by nitrogen or phosphorus, 26% were co-limited by N and P, 26% were P-limited and 13% were N-limited. TN/TP, DIN/TP and NO₃ ⁻/TP ratios from each lake were compared to the Redfield ratio to predict the limiting nutrient; however, these predictors only agreed with 29% of the bioassay results, suggesting that nutrient ratios do not provide a true measure of nutrient limitation within this region. The N-limited lakes had significantly different phytoplankton community composition with more chrysophytes and Anabaena sp. compared to all other lakes. N and P limitation of phytoplankton communities within Wapusk National Park lakes and ponds suggests that increased phytoplankton biomass may result in response to increased nutrient loading associated with environmental change.     

Phytoplankton community growth-rate response to nutrient pulses in a shallow turbid estuary, Galveston Bay, Texas

Phytoplankton growth is a physiological process often limitedby temperature, nutrients or light, while biomass accumulationis a function of growth rates, grazing and deposition. Althoughprimary productivity measurements are usually used to assessresponses to limiting factors, the rates are proportional tobiomass and inversely related to grazing pressure during experimentalincubations. Alternatively, carbon-specific growth-rate determinationsprovide insights into physiological responses without the confoundingeffects of biomass and grazing. The objective of this studywas to quantify the growth-rate responses of phytoplankton toenhanced nutrient availability (nitrate and phosphate) overa range of in situ irradiances. Growth rates were determinedbased on chlorophyll a-specific ¹⁴C-uptake rates by phytoplankton.Phytoplankton demonstrated high (24 h) growth rates when exposedto increased concentrations of limiting nutrients, independentof the surface irradiances (12–41%). Growth-rate responseswere also compared with the biomass (chlorophyll a) responsesand community composition. Observed and estimated phytoplanktonbiomass changes during the incubations differed, emphasizingthe structural role of grazers on the phytoplankton community.The phytoplankton community in Galveston Bay has the potentialto instantaneously respond to nutrient pulses, facilitatingdiatom biomass accumulations in spring and summer and small,flagellated species and cyanobacteria during periods of lownutrient inputs. Thus, Galveston Bay phytoplankton biomass andcommunity composition reflect a dynamic balance between thefrequency of nutrient pulsing and grazing intensity.     

Riverine transport and nutrient inputs affect phytoplankton communities in a coastal embayment

1. Rivers often transport phytoplankton to coastal embayments and introduce nutrients that can enrich coastal plankton communities. We investigated the effects of the Nottawasaga River on the nearshore (i.e. within 500 μm of shore) phytoplankton composition along a 10-km transect of Nottawasaga Bay, Lake Huron in 2015 and 2016. Imaging flow cytometry was used to identify and enumerate algal taxa, which were resolved at sizes larger than small nanoplankton (i.e. >5 μm). Multivariate analysis (perMANOVA and redundancy analysis) and a dilution model were used to examine how nutrients and the transport of algal taxa affected community composition in the bay.
2. Sampling stations with different percentages of river water had significantly different phytoplankton communities. Phytoplankton community composition was also strongly associated with nutrients, including total phosphorus, which also varied with the percentage of river water. The majority of the 51 phytoplankton taxa identified in 2016 had numerical abundances in the bay that could be explained simply by the dilution of incoming river water.
3. Phytoplankton transported from the river had a higher proportion of edible-sized cells (<30 μm), particularly in summer when colonial cyanobacteria were numerically dominant in the bay. Six taxa were more abundant than expected from the dilution of river water and included some cyanobacteria with late summer maxima. Five of the taxa that were transported from the river were less abundant than expected in the bay.
4. Whereas impacts of fertilisation due to the characteristically higher nutrient concentration in the river are to be expected, the strong and highly correlated effects of transport within the narrow coastal band of this study largely concealed any distinct fertilisation effects.
5. Riverine inputs may strongly influence the nearshore assemblage of phytoplankton in oligotrophic embayments in large lakes, creating hotspots for productivity, species turnover, and trophic dynamics.

     

Periodic disturbances,trophic gradient and phytoplankton characteristics related to cyanobacterial growth in Guarapiranga Reservoir,São Paulo State,Brazil

The relationships between phytoplankton assemblage, disturbance and trophic characteristics were investigated in Guarapiranga Reservoir, which supplies water to approximately 25% of the São Paulo metropolitan region. Two open-water stations were sampled weekly during 1991–92, in order to determine the main factors promoting of Cyanobacterial growth. These were found to include: rainfall-induced nutrient inputs via runoff and percolation from the drainage basin; circulation patterns that favored resurgence of nutrients and transported littoral algae to the open water; senescence of algae (especially Chlorococcales and Zygnemaphyceae) which increased the availability of nutrients in the water column; and high nutrient concentrations during the driest season. Restricting nutrient inputs and controlling eutrophication are necessary if the quality of water supplied from this reservoir is to be improved.     

Phytoplankton biomass is mainly controlled by hydrology and phosphorus concentrations in tropical hydroelectric reservoirs

Phytoplankton is widely recognized as being regulated mainly by resources (nutrients and light) and predation by higher trophic levels. In reservoirs, these controls also can be modulated by hydrology, for example through the influence of flow pulses generated by the operation of the dam. In this study, we tested the influence of light, nutrients, and zooplankton grazing pressure, and also hydrology (as water residence time) on the phytoplankton biomass in eight tropical hydroelectric reservoirs, which differ in size, morphometry, location, trophic state, and water residence time. Our hypothesis was that, as these reservoirs are used for hydroelectric purposes, the control that would otherwise be exerted on phytoplankton biomass primarily by resource availability and grazing will also be modulated by hydrology. Low phytoplankton biomass (range of system medians = 12–299 μg C l⁻¹) occurred in most systems, except for one highly eutrophic reservoir (median = 1331 μg C l⁻¹). Our data showed that phosphorus was more often likely to be the limiting nutrient in these systems, as assessed through nutrient limitation indexes (nitrogen and phosphorus), based on concentrations and ratios. For most reservoirs, excluding the eutrophic system with high cyanobacteria biomass, seasonal water residence time was the variable that best explained phytoplankton variation among the several environmental variables analyzed in this study (P < 0.0001; adjusted r ² = 0.38). Hydrology was an important and additional factor modulating phytoplankton in these tropical reservoirs, directly removing phytoplankton populations and their potential zooplankton grazers by washout, and also affecting nutrient availability.     

Pelagic phytoplankton community change‐points across nutrient gradients and in response to invasive mussels

相似文献   

Assessment of nutrient limitation in Rijeka Bay, NE Adriatic Sea, using miniaturized bioassay

In this paper we consider the trophic state and ambient nutrient limitation by the trophic index (TRIX) calculation and nutrient enrichment bioassay using the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum at two differently eutrophicated NE coastal Adriatic locations (in the Rijeka Bay area). The first station in Rijeka Port had significantly higher concentrations of dissolved inorganic nutrients and TRIX indices (up to 7.53) than the station near Opatija. The DIN/TP ratios in Rijeka Port were lower (11.03 to 44.47) than those in Opatija (38.67 to 82.00), indicating P limitation in Opatija. The nutrient enrichment bioassays revealed P as the key limiting nutrient for the diatom growth at both sites. In addition, silica limitation was found in all water samples with the exception of the surface water samples in Rijeka Port. Nitrogen limitation was rarely evident.     

Nitrogen deposition and warming – effects on phytoplankton nutrient limitation in subarctic lakes

The aim of this study was to predict the combined effects of enhanced nitrogen (N) deposition and warming on phytoplankton development in high latitude and mountain lakes. Consequently, we assessed, in a series of enclosure experiments, how lake water nutrient stoichiometry and phytoplankton nutrient limitation varied over the growing season in 11 lakes situated along an altitudinal/climate gradient with low N‐deposition (<1 kg N ha^?1 yr^?1) in northern subarctic Sweden. Short‐term bioassay experiments with N‐ and P‐additions revealed that phytoplankton in high‐alpine lakes were more prone to P‐limitation, and with decreasing altitude became increasingly N‐ and NP‐colimited. Nutrient limitation was additionally most obvious in midsummer. There was also a strong positive correlation between phytoplankton growth and water temperature in the bioassays. Although excess nutrients were available in spring and autumn, on these occasions growth was likely constrained by low water temperatures. These results imply that enhanced N‐deposition over the Swedish mountain areas will, with the exception of high‐alpine lakes, enhance biomass and drive phytoplankton from N‐ to P‐limitation. However, if not accompanied by warming, N‐input from deposition will stimulate limited phytoplankton growth due to low water temperatures during large parts of the growing season. Direct effects of warming, allowing increased metabolic rates and an extension of the growing season, seem equally crucial to synergistically enhance phytoplankton development in these lakes.     

Temporal dynamics and spatial variation of algae in relation to hydrology and sediment characteristics in the Okefenokee Swamp,Georgia

In a 20-month study, phytoplankton and periphyton chl a, and dry mass of macroscopic algal aggregates in four marshes and a lake within the Okefenokee Swamp (Georgia, USA) were comparable to other wetlands and lake littoral areas. Chlorophyll levels in two marshes were inversely related to water level and phytoplankton at three marshes developed unimodal maxima following macrophyte dieback. Standing stocks in a vernally inundated marsh were greater than a nearby marsh which was permanently inundated; chlorophyll levels displayed longer blooms in the inundated marsh during periods of low rainfall or after drought. Field dynamics, sediment sorption characteristics and algal bioassays suggest that evaporative drawdown stimulates algae by release of nutrients from exposed peat, while high water levels reduce nutrient release from sediments and disperse phytoplankton through flushing. Equilibrium phosphate concentrations of sediments and algal levels were higher at an abandoned rookery than a nearby non-rookery area, indicating nutrient enrichment from residual guano deposits.     

22 Nutrient use efficiency and coastal productivity: comparative perspectives on ecosystem structure and mechanisms of control

Net primary production in marine ecosystems ultimately reflects the inputs of nutrients and the efficiency with which nutrients are acquired and used by phytoplankton in growth. In contrast to our understanding of the linkages between nutrient loading and production, the influence of nutrient use efficiency (NUE) on cross-system variations in coastal productivity remains unclear. Nutrient use efficiency at the ecosystem scale is the product of the per capita efficiency of nutrient use in phytoplankton growth and the efficiency with which phytoplankton communities are able to assimilate limiting nutrient(s). We measured the relative dominance of ecosystem N pools by phytoplankton biomass as an index of NUE across 56 inner-shelf sites. These sites were distributed across a strong geographic range of upwelling intensity and productivity along the coasts of Oregon, California and New Zealand. We also compiled an extensive dataset of published NUE values in coastal and oceanic sites in order to assess cross-system patterns and differences in NUE. Our results indicate that exceptional rates of productivity in inner-shelf upwelling systems arise as a consequence of near dominance of ecosystem N pools by phytoplankton biomass. Elevated rates of NUE nevertheless appear to be a transient phenomenon in marine systems. Cross-shelf transects across upwelling fronts off the Oregon coast reveal a temporal pattern of intense phytoplankton blooms and decline that reflects the eventual dominance of ecosystems N pools by detrital and dissolved organic N pools. Our findings suggest that NUE may play a central role in governing the productivity of marine ecosystems.