Observations on different resin strategies for affinity purification mass spectrometry of a tagged protein

Co-affinity purification mass spectrometry (CoAP-MS) is a highly effective method for identifying protein complexes from a biological sample and inferring important interactions, but the impact of the solid support is usually not considered in design of such experiments. Affinity purification (AP) experiments typically utilize a bait protein expressing a peptide tag such as FLAG, c-Myc, HA or V5 and high affinity antibodies to these peptide sequences to facilitate isolation of a bait protein to co-purify interacting proteins. We observed significant variability for isolation of tagged bait proteins between Protein A/G Agarose, Protein G Dynabeads, and AminoLink resins. While previous research identified the importance of tag sequence and their location, crosslinking procedures, reagents, dilution, and detergent concentrations, the effect of the resin itself has not been considered. Our data suggest the type of solid support is important and, under the conditions of our experiments, AminoLink resin provided a more robust solid-support platform for AP-MS.     

Mass spectrometry approaches to study mammalian kinase and phosphatase associated proteins

Reversible phosphorylation events regulate critical aspects of cellular biology by affecting protein conformation, cellular localization, enzymatic activity and associations with interaction partners. Kinases and phosphatases interact not only with their substrates but also with regulatory subunits and other proteins, including scaffolds. In recent years, affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) has proven to be a powerful tool to identify protein-protein interactions (PPIs) involving kinases and phosphatases. In this review we outline general considerations for successful AP-MS, and describe strategies that we have used to characterize the interactions of kinases and phosphatases in human cells.     

High‐throughput generation of tagged stable cell lines for proteomic analysis

We present an optimized system for rapid generation of localization and affinity purification‐tagged mammalian stable cell lines that facilitates complex purification and interacting protein identification. The improved components of this method, including the flexibility of inducible expression, circumvent issues associated with toxicity, clonal selection, sample yields and time to data acquisition. We have applied this method to the study of cell‐cycle regulators and novel microtubule‐associated proteins.     

Membrane-SPINE: A Biochemical Tool to Identify Protein-protein Interactions of Membrane Proteins In Vivo

Membrane proteins are essential for cell viability and are therefore important therapeutic targets^1-3. Since they function in complexes⁴, methods to identify and characterize their interactions are necessary⁵. To this end, we developed the Membrane Strep-protein interaction experiment, called Membrane-SPINE⁶. This technique combines in vivo cross-linking using the reversible cross-linker formaldehyde with affinity purification of a Strep-tagged membrane bait protein. During the procedure, cross-linked prey proteins are co-purified with the membrane bait protein and subsequently separated by boiling. Hence, two major tasks can be executed when analyzing protein-protein interactions (PPIs) of membrane proteins using Membrane-SPINE: first, the confirmation of a proposed interaction partner by immunoblotting, and second, the identification of new interaction partners by mass spectrometry analysis. Moreover, even low affinity, transient PPIs are detectable by this technique. Finally, Membrane-SPINE is adaptable to almost any cell type, making it applicable as a powerful screening tool to identify PPIs of membrane proteins.     

Modeling contaminants in AP-MS/MS experiments

Identification of protein-protein interactions (PPI) by affinity purification (AP) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (AP-MS/MS) produces large data sets with high rates of false positives. This is in part because of contamination at the AP level (due to gel contamination, nonspecific binding to the TAP columns in the context of tandem affinity purification, insufficient purification, etc.). In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian approach to identify false-positive PPIs involving contaminants in AP-MS/MS experiments. Specifically, we propose a confidence assessment algorithm (called Decontaminator) that builds a model of contaminants using a small number of representative control experiments. It then uses this model to determine whether the Mascot score of a putative prey is significantly larger than what was observed in control experiments and assigns it a p-value and a false discovery rate. We show that our method identifies contaminants better than previously used approaches and results in a set of PPIs with a larger overlap with databases of known PPIs. Our approach will thus allow improved accuracy in PPI identification while reducing the number of control experiments required.     

Distinctive Network Topology of Phase-Separated Proteins in Human Interactome

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is an important mechanism that mediates the formation of biomolecular condensates. Despite the immense interest in LLPS, phase-separated proteins verified by experiments are still limited, and identification of phase-separated proteins at proteome-scale is a challenging task. Multivalent interaction among macromolecules is the driving force of LLPS, which suggests that phase-separated proteins may harbor distinct biological characteristics in protein–protein interactions (PPIs). In this study, we constructed an integrated human PPI network (HPIN) and mapped phase-separated proteins into it. Analysis of the network parameters revealed differences of network topology between phase-separated proteins and others. The results further suggested the efficiency when applying topological similarities in distinguishing components of MLOs. Furthermore, we found that affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) detects PPIs more effectively than yeast-two hybrid system (Y2H) in phase separation-driven condensates. Our work provides the first global view of the distinct network topology of phase-separated proteins in human interactome, suggesting incorporation of PPI network for LLPS prediction in further studies.     

Dual-tagging system for the affinity purification of mammalian protein complexes

Although affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) provides a powerful tool to study protein-protein interactions, this strategy has encountered numerous difficulties when adapted to mammalian cells. Here we describe a Gateway-compatible dual-tag affinity purification system that integrates regulatable expression, tetracysteine motifs, and various combinations ofaffinity tags to facilitate the cloning, detection, and purification of bait proteins and their interacting partners. Utilizing the human telomere binding protein TRF2 as a benchmark, we demonstrate bait protein recoveries upwards of approximately 16% from as little as 1-7 x 10(7) cells and successfully identify known TRF2 interacting proteins, suggesting that our dual-tag affinity purification approach is a capable new tool for expanding the capacity to explore mammalian proteomic networks.     

Tandem affinity purification in Drosophila: the advantages of the GS-TAP system

Tandem affinity purification (TAP) has been widely used for the analysis of protein complexes. We investigated the parameters of the recently developed TAP method (GS-TAP) and its application in Drosophila. This new tag combination includes two Protein G modules and a streptavidin binding peptide (SBP), separated by one or two TEV protease cleavage sites. We made pMK33-based GS-TAP vectors to allow for generation of stable cell lines using hygromycin selection and inducible expression from a metallothionein promoter, as well as pUAST-based vectors that can be used for inducible expression in flies. Rescue experiments in flies demonstrated that the GS-TAP tag preserves the function of the tagged protein. We have done parallel purifications of proteins tagged with the new GS-TAP tag or with the conventional TAP tag (containing the Protein A and calmodulin binding peptide domains) at the amino terminus, using both cultured cells and embryos. A major difference between the two tags was in the levels of contaminating proteins, which were significantly lower in the GS-TAP purifications. The GS-TAP procedure also resulted in higher yield of the bait protein. Overall, GS-TAP is an improved method of protein complex purification because it provides a superior signal-to-noise ratio of the bait protein relative to contaminants in purified material.     

Protein-protein interactions in plants

The study of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is essential to uncover unknown functions of proteins at the molecular level and to gain insight into complex cellular networks. Affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS), yeast two-hybrid, imaging approaches and numerous diverse databases have been developed as strategies to analyze PPIs. The past decade has seen an increase in the number of identified proteins with the development of MS and large-scale proteome analyses. Consequently, the false-positive protein identification rate has also increased. Therefore, the general consensus is to confirm PPI data using one or more independent approaches for an accurate evaluation. Furthermore, identifying minor PPIs is fundamental for understanding the functions of transient interactions and low-abundance proteins. Besides establishing PPI methodologies, we are now seeing the development of new methods and/or improvements in existing methods, which involve identifying minor proteins by MS, multidimensional protein identification technology or OFFGEL electrophoresis analyses, one-shot analysis with a long column or filter-aided sample preparation methods. These advanced techniques should allow thousands of proteins to be identified, whereas in-depth proteomic methods should permit the identification of transient binding or PPIs with weak affinity. Here, the current status of PPI analysis is reviewed and some advanced techniques are discussed briefly along with future challenges for plant proteomics.     

Computational detection of protein complexes in AP-MS experiments

Protein complex identification is an important goal of protein-protein interaction analysis. To date, development of computational methods for detecting protein complexes has been largely motivated by genome-scale interaction data sets from high-throughput assays such as yeast two-hybrid or tandem affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (TAP-MS). However, due to the popularity of small to intermediate-scale affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments, protein complex detection is increasingly discussed in local network analysis. In such data sets, protein complexes cannot be detected using binary interaction data alone because the data contain interactions with tagged proteins only and, as a result, interactions between all other proteins remain unobserved, limiting the scope of existing algorithms. In this article, we provide a pragmatic review of network graph-based computational algorithms for protein complex analysis in global interactome data, without requiring any computational background. We discuss the practical gap in applying these algorithms to recently surging small to intermediate-scale AP-MS data sets, and review alternative clustering algorithms using quantitative proteomics data and their limitations.     

Identification of novel protein-protein interactions using a versatile mammalian tandem affinity purification expression system

Identification of protein-protein interactions is essential for elucidating the biochemical mechanism of signal transduction. Purification and identification of individual proteins in mammalian cells have been difficult, however, due to the sheer complexity of protein mixtures obtained from cellular extracts. Recently, a tandem affinity purification (TAP) method has been developed as a tool that allows rapid purification of native protein complexes expressed at their natural level in engineered yeast cells. To adapt this method to mammalian cells, we have created a TAP tag retroviral expression vector to allow stable expression of the TAP-tagged protein at close to physiological levels. To demonstrate the utility of this vector, we have fused a TAP tag, consisting of a protein A tag, a cleavage site for the tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease, and the FLAG epitope, to the N terminus of human SMAD3 and SMAD4. We have stably expressed these proteins in mammalian cells at desirable levels by retroviral gene transfer and purified native SMAD3 protein complexes from cell lysates. The combination of two different affinity tags greatly reduced the number of nonspecific proteins in the mixture. We have identified HSP70 as a specific interacting protein of SMAD3. We demonstrated that SMAD3, but not SMAD1, binds HSP70 in vivo, validating the TAP purification approach. This method is applicable to virtually any protein and provides an efficient way to purify unknown proteins to homogeneity from the complex mixtures found in mammalian cell lysates in preparation for identification by mass spectrometry.     

Purification and identification of G protein-coupled receptor protein complexes under native conditions

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of membrane receptors and are of major therapeutic importance. The identification of GPCR-associated proteins is an important step toward a better understanding of these receptors. However, current methods are not satisfying as only isolated receptor domains (intracellular loops or carboxyl-terminal tails) can be used as "bait." We report here a method based on tandem affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry that overcomes these limitations as the entire receptor is used to identify protein complexes formed in living mammalian cells. The human MT(1) and MT(2) melatonin receptors were chosen as model GPCRs. Both receptors were tagged with the tandem affinity purification tag at their carboxyl-terminal tails and expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Receptor solubilization and purification conditions were optimized. The method was validated by the co-purification of G(i) proteins, which are well known GPCR interaction partners but which are difficult to identify with current protein-protein interaction assays. Several new and functionally relevant MT(1)- and MT(2)-associated proteins were identified; some of them were common to both receptors, and others were specific for each subtype. Taken together, our protocol allowed for the first time the purification of GPCR-associated proteins under native conditions in quantities suitable for mass spectrometry analysis.     

Extracting gene function from protein-protein interactions using Quantitative BAC InteraCtomics (QUBIC)

Large-scale proteomic screens are increasingly employed for placing genes into specific pathways. Therefore generic methods providing a physiological context for protein-protein interaction studies are of great interest. In recent years many protein-protein interactions have been determined by affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP-MS). Among many different AP-MS approaches, the recently developed Quantitative BAC InteraCtomics (QUBIC) approach is particularly attractive as it uses tagged, full-length baits that are expressed under endogenous control. For QUBIC large cell line collections expressing tagged proteins from BAC transgenes or gene trap loci have been developed and are freely available. Here we describe detailed workflows on how to obtain specific protein binding partners with high confidence under physiological conditions. The methods are based on fast, streamlined and generic purification procedures followed by single run liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis. Quantification is achieved either by the stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) method or by a 'label-free' procedure. In either case data analysis is performed by using the freely available MaxQuant environment. The QUBIC approach enables biologists with access to high resolution mass spectrometry to perform small and large-scale protein interactome mappings.     

Analyzing protein-protein interactions by quantitative mass spectrometry

Since most cellular processes depend on interactions between proteins, information about protein–protein interactions (PPIs) provide valuable insights into protein function. Over the last years, quantitative affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (q-AP-MS) has become a powerful approach to investigate PPIs in an unbiased manner. In q-AP-MS the protein of interest is biochemically enriched together with its interaction partners. In parallel, a control experiment is performed to control for non-specific binding. Quantitative mass spectrometry is then employed to compare protein levels in both samples and to exclude non-specific contaminants. Here, we provide two detailed q-AP-MS protocols for pull-downs with immobilized bait proteins or transient transfection of tagged expression constructs. We discuss benefits and limitations of q-AP-MS and highlight critical parameters that need to be considered. The protocols and background information presented here allow the reader to adapt the generic q-AP-MS strategy for a wide range of biological questions.     

Biotin tagging coupled with amino acid‐coded mass tagging for efficient and precise screening of interaction proteome in mammalian cells

In mammalian cells, when tandem affinity purification approach is employed, the existence of untagged endogenous target protein and repetitive washing steps together result in overall low yield of purified/stable complexes and the loss of weakly and transiently interacting partners of biological significance. To avoid the trade‐offs involving in methodological sensitivity, precision, and throughput, here we introduce an integrated method, biotin tagging coupled with amino acid‐coded mass tagging, for highly sensitive and accurate screening of mammalian protein–protein interactions. Without the need of establishing a stable cell line, using a short peptide tag which could be specifically biotinylated in vivo, the biotin‐tagged target/bait protein was then isolated along with its associates efficiently by streptavidin magnetic microbeads in a single step. In a pulled‐down complex amino acid‐coded mass tagging serves as “in‐spectra” quantitative markers to distinguish those bait‐specific interactors from non‐specific background proteins under stringent criteria. Applying this biotin tagging coupled with amino acid‐coded mass tagging approach, we first biotin‐tagged in vivo a multi‐functional protein family member, 14‐3‐3ε, which was expressed at close to endogenous level. Starting with approximately 20 millions of 293T cells which were significantly less than what needed for a tandem affinity purification run, 266 specific interactors of 14‐3‐3ε were identified in high confidence.     

Two methods for improved purification of full-length mammalian proteins that have poor expression and/or solubility using standard Escherichia coli procedures

Many mammalian proteins are multifunctional proteins with biological activities whose characterization often requires in vitro studies. However, these studies depend on generation of sufficient quantities of recombinant protein and many mammalian proteins cannot be easily expressed and purified as full-length products. One example is the Wilm's tumor gene product, WT1, which has proven difficult to express as a full-length purified recombinant protein using standard approaches. To facilitate expression of full-length WT1 we have developed approaches that optimized its expression and purification in Escherichia coli and mammalian cells. First, using a bicistronic vector system, we successfully expressed and purified WT1 containing a C-terminal tandem affinity tag in 293T cells. Second, using a specific strain of E. coli transformed with a modified GST vector, we successfully expressed and purified N-terminal GST tagged and C-terminal 2x FLAG tagged full-length human WT1. The benefits of these approaches include: (1) two-step affinity purification to allow high quality of protein purification, (2) large soluble tags that can be used for a first affinity purification step, but then conveniently removed with the highly site-specific TEV protease, and (3) the use of non-denaturing purification and elution conditions that are predicted to preserve native protein conformation and function.     

IMAC capture of recombinant protein from unclarified mammalian cell feed streams

Fusion‐tag affinity chromatography is a key technique in recombinant protein purification. Current methods for protein recovery from mammalian cells are hampered by the need for feed stream clarification. We have developed a method for direct capture using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) of hexahistidine (His6) tagged proteins from unclarified mammalian cell feed streams. The process employs radial flow chromatography with 300–500 μm diameter agarose resin beads that allow free passage of cells but capture His‐tagged proteins from the feed stream; circumventing expensive and cumbersome centrifugation and/or filtration steps. The method is exemplified by Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell expression and subsequent recovery of recombinant His‐tagged carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); a heavily glycosylated and clinically relevant protein. Despite operating at a high NaCl concentration necessary for IMAC binding, cells remained over 96% viable after passage through the column with host cell proteases and DNA detected at ～8 U/mL and 2 ng/μL in column flow‐through, respectively. Recovery of His‐tagged CEA from unclarified feed yielded 71% product recovery. This work provides a basis for direct primary capture of fully glycosylated recombinant proteins from unclarified mammalian cell feed streams. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 130–140. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Identification of Protein Interacting Partners Using Tandem Affinity Purification

A critical and often limiting step in understanding the function of host and viral proteins is the identification of interacting cellular or viral protein partners. There are many approaches that allow the identification of interacting partners, including the yeast two hybrid system, as well as pull down assays using recombinant proteins and immunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins followed by mass spectrometry identification¹. Recent studies have highlighted the utility of double-affinity tag mediated purification, coupled with two specific elution steps in the identification of interacting proteins. This approach, termed Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP), was initially used in yeast^2,3 but more recently has been adapted to use in mammalian cells^4-8.As proof-of-concept we have established a tandem affinity purification (TAP) method using the well-characterized eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E^9,10.The cellular translation factor eIF4E is a critical component of the cellular eIF4F complex involved in cap-dependent translation initiation¹⁰. The TAP tag used in the current study is composed of two Protein G units and a streptavidin binding peptide separated by a Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease cleavage sequence. The TAP tag used in the current study is composed of two Protein G units and a streptavidin binding peptide separated by a Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease cleavage sequence⁸. To forgo the need for the generation of clonal cell lines, we developed a rapid system that relies on the expression of the TAP-tagged bait protein from an episomally maintained plasmid based on pMEP4 (Invitrogen). Expression of tagged murine eIF4E from this plasmid was controlled using the cadmium chloride inducible metallothionein promoter.Lysis of the expressing cells and subsequent affinity purification via binding to rabbit IgG agarose, TEV protease cleavage, binding to streptavidin linked agarose and subsequent biotin elution identified numerous proteins apparently specific to the eIF4E pull-down (when compared to control cell lines expressing the TAP tag alone). The identities of the proteins were obtained by excision of the bands from 1D SDS-PAGE and subsequent tandem mass spectrometry. The identified components included the known eIF4E binding proteins eIF4G and 4EBP-1. In addition, other components of the eIF4F complex, of which eIF4E is a component were identified, namely eIF4A and Poly-A binding protein. The ability to identify not only known direct binding partners as well as secondary interacting proteins, further highlights the utility of this approach in the characterization of proteins of unknown function.     

An optimized protocol for protein purification in cultured mammalian cells using a tandem affinity purification approach

This protocol describes a method that we developed to adapt the tandem affinity purification (TAP) approach for use in mammalian cells. The protocol involves fusing a protein of interest with a tandem tag consisting of two FLAG tags (FF) followed by two protein-A immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding domains (ZZ). The protocol improves upon previously published TAP approaches by employing FLAG in place of calmodulin binding peptide (CBP) with resulting higher recovery during purification. In addition, we use a bicistronic expression system that ensures recovery of stably transfected cell lines expressing easily detectable levels of the protein of interest. A method is also presented for generating cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts, which extends use of this protocol to identify protein-protein interactions occurring specifically in the cytoplasm or nucleus. This protocol facilitates the preparation of partially purified recombinant protein and identification of protein-protein interactions in mammalian cell culture models. The protocol can be completed in 34 h.     

In vivo analysis of proteomes and interactomes using Parallel Affinity Capture (iPAC) coupled to mass spectrometry

Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry provides a reliable method for identifying proteins and their binding partners. In this study we have used Drosophila melanogaster proteins triple tagged with Flag, Strep II, and Yellow fluorescent protein in vivo within affinity pull-down experiments and isolated these proteins in their native complexes from embryos. We describe a pipeline for determining interactomes by Parallel Affinity Capture (iPAC) and show its use by identifying partners of several protein baits with a range of sizes and subcellular locations. This purification protocol employs the different tags in parallel and involves detailed comparison of resulting mass spectrometry data sets, ensuring the interaction lists achieved are of high confidence. We show that this approach identifies known interactors of bait proteins as well as novel interaction partners by comparing data achieved with published interaction data sets. The high confidence in vivo protein data sets presented here add new data to the currently incomplete D. melanogaster interactome. Additionally we report contaminant proteins that are persistent with affinity purifications irrespective of the tagged bait.