Cardiovascular disease with diabetes or the metabolic syndrome: should statins or fibrates be first line lipid therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Subgroups with diabetes or with features of the metabolic syndrome have been increasingly highlighted in large clinical endpoint trials with lipid therapy. This review will focus on the results of trials with statins or fibrates and examine the strength of the evidence for major cardiovascular event reduction with each kind of therapy in these high-risk subgroups that typically have low-to-moderate levels of LDL cholesterol. RECENT FINDINGS: Of six statin trials in populations with moderately increased LDL cholesterol only one, the Heart Protection Study, has shown that statin therapy will significantly reduce the major coronary heart disease events of non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease death in diabetes. None of these trials has shown that statins have a particular predilection for reducing cardiovascular events in individuals with higher levels of body weight or other features of the metabolic syndrome. There are far fewer trial data with fibrates than with statins. However, the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial has shown that a fibrate can significantly reduce major cardiovascular events, most particularly coronary heart disease death, in those with diabetes as well as those without diabetes who have insulin resistance. Indeed, all fibrate trials show that this therapy appears to selectively benefit the individual with obesity and features of the metabolic syndrome. SUMMARY: Based principally on evidence from the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial and the cumulative experience with statins, trial data would thus far suggest that the patient with a modest increase in LDL cholesterol who has diabetes or features of the metabolic syndrome might be likely to achieve more substantial cardiovascular benefit from fibrate than from statin therapy.     

Which is the best lipid-modifying strategy in metabolic syndrome and diabetes: fibrates, statins or both?

Although less clinical intervention studies have been performed with fibrates than with statins, there are evidences indicating that fibrates may reduce risk of cardiovascular events. The potential clinical benefit of the fenofibrate will be specified by the ongoing Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, which rationale, methods and aims have been just published. Controlled clinical trials show similar or even greater cardiovascular benefits from statins-based therapy in patient subgroups with diabetes compared with overall study populations. Therefore, statins are the drug of first choice for aggressive lipid lowering actions and reducing risk of coronary artery disease in these patients. However, current therapeutic use of statins as monotherapy is still leaving many patients with mixed atherogenic dyslipidemia at high risk for coronary events. A combination statin/fibrate therapy may be often necessary to control all lipid abnormalities in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetes adequately, since fibrates provide additional important benefits, particularly on triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels. Thus, this combined therapy concentrates on all the components of the mixed dyslipidemia that often occurs in persons with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, and may be expected to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Safety concerns about some fibrates such as gemfibrozil may lead to exaggerate precautions regarding fibrate administration and therefore diminish the use of the seagents. However, other fibrates, such as bezafibrate and fenofibrate appear to be safer and better tolerated. We believe that a proper co-administration of statins and fibrates, selected on basis of their safety, could be more effective in achieving a comprehensive lipid control as compared with monotherapy.     

Hypertriglyceridemia and the fibrate trials

Epidemiological studies published since 1996 have established that hypertriglyceridemia can predict risk of cardiovascular disease in a manner statistically independent of HDL cholesterol. Nevertheless, the relationship of concentrations of plasma triglycerides to risk of cardiovascular disease remains less than straightforward, partly because triglycerides are carried in lipoproteins of different atherogenicity, partly because hypertriglyceridemia is associated with non-lipid atherogenic and thrombogenic processes. For example, the association of highest risk of cardiovascular disease to moderate rather than to severe hypertriglyceridemia can be understood in terms of the distribution of triglycerides between different classes of plasma lipoproteins. It is counter-intuitive to most clinicians, however, and hence it can result in the misdirection of clinical efforts including drug therapy.Fibrates lower plasma triglycerides, and raise HDL, efficiently and with few immediate side-effects. Central to their mode of action is activation of certain nuclear receptors in cells. There is no necessary connection, however, between that fascinating biochemistry and clinical benefit as defined by reductions in rates of death by coronary artery disease. A review of trials of cholesterol-lowering by diet and drugs, published between 1966 and 1996, included 12 trials of therapy with fibrates or placebo in more than 21000 patients. Overall, these trials indicated no benefit in terms of reduction in risk of coronary deaths. The period since 1996 has seen the publication of four additional trials of treatment of 6144 patients with fibrates or placebo. Two of them were major trials. The VA-HIT was very encouraging, because treatment with gemfibrozil produced a signficant reduction in the combined incidence of fatal and non-fatal coronary events. There was no significant reduction in coronary deaths, however. The results of BIP were frankly disappointing, because they demonstrated no significant effect of treatment with bezafibrate on either the primary end-point of the trial or on rates of coronary death.Clinical indications for the use of fibrates can obviously not be based on biochemical insights, however intriguing in their own right, but they have also not been satisfactorily defined by the randomized clinical trials published to date. Hope remains, however, that some clarification will result from ongoing trials of fibrate treatment of patients with type II diabetes.     

Role for fibrate therapy in diabetes: evidence before FIELD

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetic dyslipidaemia, among the main factors contributing to vascular risk in type 2 diabetes, is characterized by hypertriglyceridaemia, low HDL-cholesterol and increased prevalence of small dense LDL particles. Because fibrates have positive effects on triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and LDL particle size, they may be an appropriate treatment for diabetic dyslipidaemia. Statins have been shown to diminish significantly the risk for coronary disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, and so what are the real effects of fibrates on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes? RECENT FINDINGS: Although statins reduce the incidence of coronary disease in type 2 diabetes, data from clinical trials demonstrate 'residual' cardiovascular risk in these patients treated with statins. Clinical trials with fibrates show that they are particularly effective in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes/metabolic syndrome and in those exhibiting the lipid abnormalities typical of diabetic dyslipidaemia (elevated triglycerides, low HDL-cholesterol). SUMMARY: Data on the effects of fibrates on cardiovascular risk in diabetes were obtained from subgroup analyses. Thus far, the only study performed specifically in patients with type 2 diabetes is the angiographic Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study which demonstrated a significant reduction in progression of atherosclerosis in patients receiving fenofibrate, but it was not powered to analyse the effects of fibrates on clinical outcomes. This is why the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study is needed; it will provide robust data on the ability of fibrates to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Weight Gain and Management Concerns in Patients on Insulin Therapy

Background: The benefits of tight glycemic control in preventing the onset and progression of microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are unarguable. The majority of patients with type 2 DM will eventually require insulin to achieve adequate glycemic control. Using insulin earlier rather than later in the course of type 2 DM may diminish the deleterious effects of hyperglycemia on β-cell function and therefore help prolong good glycemic control and prevent the occurrence of microvascular complications. However, weight gain is a potential adverse effect of insulin therapy.Objective: The goal of this article was to describe the benefit of insulin therapy early in the course of type 2 DM, review the association of weight gain with insulin therapy, and examine potential detrimental effects that insulin-associated weight gain could have in patients with type 2 DM.Methods: Materials used for this article were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966–2006). English-language articles were chosen using the search terms diabetes mellitus type 2, insulin, and obesity.Results: Intensive insulin therapy is often associated with weight gain. Although there is concern that weight gain in patients with type 2 DM may have adverse effects on risk factors for cardiovascular disease, unfavorable changes in blood pressure and lipid levels have not been consistently observed in clinical trials. Furthermore, clinical evidence, including data from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, supports the view that intensive insulin therapy does not increase the risk for cardiovascular disease.Conclusions: Early insulin therapy in patients with type 2 DM may be a strategy that will help patients achieve and maintain good glycemic control, thereby reducing the risk of developing microvascular complications. Although weight gain is commonly associated with insulin therapy, it does not appear to put these patients at greater risk for cardiovascular disease.     

Are statins anti-inflammatory?

Large scale clinical trials demonstrate significant reductions in cardiovascular event rates with statin therapy. The observed benefit of statin therapy, however, may be larger in these trials than that expected on the basis of lipid lowering alone. Emerging evidence from both clinical trials and basic science studies suggest that statins have anti-inflammatory properties, which may additionally lead to clinical efficacy. Measurement of markers of inflammation such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein in addition to lipid parameters may help identify those patients who will benefit most from statin therapy.     

Statin therapy for prevention and treatment of acute and chronic cardiovascular disease: update on recent trials and metaanalyses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the evidence from recent clinical trials and metaanalyses on the efficacy of statin therapy to reduce death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and to review the effects of statins in patients with low LDL cholesterol, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and acute coronary syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: In large metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials relative risk reductions from statins compared with placebo for patients with manifest or with risk factors for coronary artery disease were 13% for overall mortality, 26% for fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 18% for fatal and nonfatal stroke. Evidence from large trials suggests that patients with type II diabetes compared with patients without diabetes have similar risk reductions from statins for cardiovascular events, but this benefit is not seen in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, early treatment with high-dose atorvastatin reduces cardiovascular morbidity after the first 4 months following the event, but the impact on mortality endpoints remains less clear. Results from recent trials in patients with stable coronary artery disease or type II diabetes suggest that statins provide benefit at considerable low LDL cholesterol levels. Therefore, target values for LDL cholesterol of less than 1.8 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) should be considered for all patients with coronary artery disease or equivalent coronary risk. SUMMARY: For patients at high risk of coronary artery disease there is growing evidence for the concept of 'the lower, the better' regarding LDL cholesterol levels. Ongoing trials are further investigating the safety of lower target values in patients at various risk of coronary artery disease.     

Fibrates, dyslipoproteinaemia and cardiovascular disease

Recent epidemiological data have reaffirmed that elevated plasma triglyceride and low HDL-cholesterol levels are important risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease. The rationale for the clinical use of fibric acid derivatives, which are designed to correct this metabolic nexus, is now on firmer ground. The mechanism of action of fibrates on lipoprotein metabolism has recently been elucidated at the molecular level and involves the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha 1 in the liver, with the net effect of improving the plasma transport rates of several lipoproteins. Other potential anti-atherothrombotic effects include the inhibition of coagulation and enhancement of fibrinolysis, as well as the inhibition of inflammatory mediators involved in atherogenesis. These consequences probably underpin the favourable effects of fibrates seen in recent angiographic and clinical trials. Two important clinical trials on the effect of gemfibrozil (Veterans Administration-HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial) and bezafibrate (Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Study) have recently been completed in subjects with elevated triglyceride, low HDL and normal or near-normal LDL-cholesterol levels. The results testify to the efficacy of these agents in decreasing the incidence of cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with multiple risk factors and plasma triglyceride levels of over 2.2 mmol/l. The findings of these trials are compared with the statin-based Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study, with a recommendation that future studies in appropriately selected patients should examine the synergistic effect of the fibrate/statin combination. The absolute risk reduction in the incidence of coronary events in the Veterans Administration-HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial compares favourably with the statin trials. The therapeutic aspects of the efficacy and safety of fibrates are reviewed. Besides primary mixed hyperlipidaemias, particular indications for the clinical use of fibrates include type 2 diabetes, the metabolic syndrome and renal insufficiency. The St Mary's, Ealing, Northwick Park Diabetes Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Study has suggested that fibrates may decrease the incidence of coronary events in type 2 diabetes, but this hypothesis will be more extensively tested in the Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, Fenofibrate in Event Lowering in Diabetes Study and Lipids in Diabetes Study projects. Although significant new knowledge has accrued over the past few years concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of fibrates, the success of these agents in clinical practice depends on the availability of methods for assessing cardiovascular risk as well as on treatment guidelines, which as presently designed and recommended may be inaccurate and suboptimal.     

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists in atherosclerosis: current evidence and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes globally is reaching epidemic proportions. Type 2 diabetes is strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis is thought to arise as a result of a chronic inflammatory process within the arterial wall. Insulin resistance is central to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes and may contribute to atherogenesis, either directly or through associated risk factors. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists, the thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, are insulin sensitizing agents, that are licensed for the management of hyperglycaemia. Growing evidence supports an array of additional effects of thiazolidinedione therapy, both immunomodulatory and antiinflammatory, which may attenuate atherogenesis in type 2 diabetes. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have shown that thiazolidinedione therapy may lead to risk factor modulation in type 2 diabetes. Thiazolidinediones treatment has been shown to reduce blood pressure, modify the atherogenic lipid profile associated with type 2 diabetes, reduce microalbuminuria and ameliorate the prothrombotic diathesis. Further evidence suggests that thiazolidinediones therapy inhibits the inflammatory processes which may be involved in atherosclerotic plaque initiation, propagation and destabilization. SUMMARY: Modification of insulin resistance by thiazolidinedione therapy in type 2 diabetes and the range of pleiotropic effects may not only impact on incident type 2 diabetes, but also on associated cardiovascular disease. Numerous large clinical endpoint studies are under way to investigate these issues.     

Statin therapy in heart failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-A reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been shown to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among a wide spectrum of patients with established atherosclerotic vascular disease. Mounting experimental and clinical evidence also suggest a potential benefit as well as theoretical harm of statin therapy in patients with heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: This article briefly summarizes the therapeutic properties of statins that may be of benefit to patients with heart failure and the theoretical adverse effects of cholesterol reduction in this group of patients. A number of nonrandomized clinical studies over the past several years have shown an association between statin use and reduced overall mortality. Several large-scale randomized studies designed to confirm these findings are currently under way. SUMMARY: Statin therapy appears to improve clinical outcomes in patients with both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy independently of their cholesterol-lowering properties. The theoretical adverse properties of statins in heart failure patients have not been substantiated in small to medium-sized clinical trials. Although the encouraging results of these preliminary studies suggest a role for statin therapy in heart failure, larger studies are needed to validate these findings. Several ongoing randomized trials are currently under way to evaluate the effect of statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients. The results of these studies, expected in the next several years, should provide scientific evidence for the role of statins in the treatment of failure.     

Hypertriglyceridemia, the coronary heart disease risk marker "solved"

Both epidemiological and intervention studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant cardiovascular risk factor. The large variation of the triglyceride values is explained by the influence of several modifying factors, which are difficult to standardise. Therefore hypertriglyceridemia should be considered rather as risk marker, than risk factor. The measurement of the apolipoprotein CIII level, which is a more stable parameter of the triglyceride rich lipid particles, is now becoming more widespread. This parameter is also able to substitute the assessment of the small dense LDL form that has a controversial significance. The clinical benefit of reduction of triglyceride concentration and the accompanying increase of HDL cholesterol level by fibrates, in the prevention of the coronary heart disease (CHD) events, have been demonstrated in several prospective, placebo-controlled trials. The VA-HIT study, enrolling the largest number of patients, has shown that fibrates have another effect, presumably influencing the insulin resistance independently of lipid levels that is also able to reduce the CHD events.     

Lipid-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The risk of cardiovascular disease is markedly increased in people with type 2 diabetes. There is abundant epidemiological and clinical trial evidence that lipid abnormalities play a major role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic vascular disease in diabetes. Although the benefits of lipid-lowering therapy are well established in people without diabetes, the evidence in people with diabetes is not as well established. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent population studies of lipid-lowering therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes that included people with diabetes and performed a separate subgroup analysis were reviewed. Lipid lowering with statins and fibrates is effective in improving cardiovascular disease outcomes in diabetes, and their effectiveness is similar to that in the non-diabetic population. This effect is well established in secondary prevention and is accumulating for primary prevention. SUMMARY: Individuals with diabetes require aggressive management of dyslipidaemia as part of an overall management strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Individuals with a previous cardiovascular disease event should be on lipid-lowering therapy, whereas in those who have not had a previous cardiovascular disease event, the decision to use lipid-lowering therapy should be based on lipid levels and the overall risk of a future event. The results of large studies that are currently in progress specifically in people with diabetes should resolve outstanding questions in relation to lipid-lowering therapy in diabetes.     

Niacin in cardiovascular prevention: mechanisms, efficacy, and safety

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes niacin's mechanism of action, efficacy in cardiovascular prevention, and safety. RECENT FINDINGS: A G-protein-coupled receptor [GPR109A/HM74A, mouse PUMA-G (protein upregulated in macrophages by interferon-gamma)] was found to mediate the antilipolytic effect of niacin via inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in adipocytes. The same receptor in skin Langerhans cells mediates the common flushing side effect. The endogenous ligand for the receptor may be beta-hydroxybutyrate. Among nine controlled clinical trials using niacin, mostly combined with other drugs, statistically significant positive impact on clinical or anatomic cardiovascular end-points was found in seven, which represents a remarkably consistent record of benefit. Although niacin induces insulin resistance, deterioration of glycemic control in diabetes is usually minor, and there is no evidence of increased incidence of new onset diabetes. Hepatic toxicity is common with higher doses of sustained-release niacin but rare with immediate-release and extended-release niacin at doses up to 2000 mg/day. Extended-release and immediate-release niacin do not substantially potentiate myopathic effects when given in combination with statins. SUMMARY: Recently developed understanding of the mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of niacin, along with progress in reducing the chief side effect of flushing, should enhance the use of this valuable agent for cardiovascular prevention.     

Hypertriglyceridemia: cause or consequence of insulin resistance?

An overproduction of VLDL by the liver and a slower clearance of these lipoproteins are usually seen in diabetic patients. There is correlation between insulin resistance and plasma triglyceride concentration. Triglyceride may influence an early step in the insulin action pathway and alternatively, insulin resistance may cause hypertriglyceridemia. Hyperinsulinemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia may play a strong role in the cardiovascular risk of patients with type II diabetes. There is an important need to conduct trials to define therapy that can reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications.     

Cholesterol metabolism,pancreatic β-cell function and diabetes

Cholesterol plays an essential role in determining cell membrane physico-chemical characteristics and functions. A proper membrane structure is critical in pancreatic β-cells for glucose-mediated insulin secretion, and alterations in cellular cholesterol content may negatively affect this process, leading to β-cell dysfunction. The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) appears to play a relevant role in ß-cell dysfunction due to cholesterol accumulation. This observation raised the question of whether hypocholesterolemic drugs which increase LDL-R expression might bear diabetogenic properties, thus increasing the risk of new-onset diabetes or worsen glycaemic parameters in diabetic patients.Being at higher cardiovascular risk, diabetic patients are usually treated with hypolipidemic drugs to correct the atherogenic dyslipidemia characteristic of this pathological condition. Statin therapy has been associated with an increased incidence of new-onset diabetes (NOD), being the diabetogenic effect depending on the type and dose of statin. However, it is worth noting that the benefits on cardiovascular mortality largely exceed the increased risk associated with the development of diabetes. Although genetic variants associated with lower levels of LDL-C are also associated with an increased NOD risk, clinical trials with lipid-lowering drugs other than statins, namely ezetimibe or monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9, did not observe an increase of developing diabetes.In summary, molecular evidence clearly points to a key role for cholesterol homeostasis in pancreatic β-cell function which, in humans, is negatively affected by statins. Available data exclude that this could be the case for other hypocholesterolemic approaches, but long-term studies are warranted to explore this critical aspect.     

Rethinking leptin and insulin action: therapeutic opportunities for diabetes

Leptin is an adipocyte-derived hormone that primarily acts in the hypothalamus and plays a key role in the regulation of food intake, body weight, energy expenditure and neuroendocrine function. Leptin has direct peripheral effects on several tissues, and it may be independently involved in insulin secretion and action besides its effects on body weight regulation. Basal plasma leptin and insulin concentrations correlate with each other. Insulin and glucose appear to increase leptin secretion. In turn, leptin increases peripheral insulin sensitivity while decreasing insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells. Leptin increases skeletal muscle glucose uptake and oxidation, and suppresses hepatic glucose output. Effects of leptin on lipid metabolism might reduce lipotoxicity and therefore contribute to the improvement of hepatic, skeletal and whole body insulin sensitivity. Leptin is the first adipokine used in the treatment of hypoleptinemic clinical disorders. Although leptin therapy has limited success in common obesity, it has impressive effects in congenital leptin deficiency, lipoatrophic diabetes and syndromes of severe insulin resistance. Leptin has been reported to ameliorate hyperinsulinemia and diabetes in the clinical setting of congenital leptin deficiency. It also improves hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia and hepatic steatosis in lipoatrophic diabetes. These promising results warrant clinical trials to test the hypothesis that leptin alone or with classical antidiabetic agents may potentially be beneficial in the treatment of hypoleptinemic non-obese individuals with glucose intolerance and diabetes. This review summarizes the clinical applications of leptin, particularly emphasizing the effects of leptin on glucose homeostasis.     

The safety and efficacy of achieving very low LDL-cholesterol concentrations with high dose statin therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The benefits of lipid lowering with statins are established in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. Recent trials with high doses of potent statins have examined treating to very low levels of LDL-cholesterol. Concerns have been raised about the safety of this strategy. This review examines the safety and efficacy of treating to very low LDL-cholesterol. RECENT FINDINGS: Four clinical trials, Treating to New Targets (TNT) and Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) in stable coronary artery disease and Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) and Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT)-TIMI 22 following acute coronary syndromes, have examined intensive statin therapy compared to moderate statin therapy. These trials and a meta-analysis demonstrated that intensive statin therapy reduces cardiovascular events. Subsequent analyses from these trials suggest that very low levels of LDL-cholesterol can be achieved safely and may improve clinical outcomes. A note of caution regarding hemorrhagic events following stroke with intensive statin therapy was raised by the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction of Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial despite impressive reductions in cardiovascular events. SUMMARY: A growing body of evidence suggests progressive benefit for lowering LDL-cholesterol aggressively with intensive statin therapy in coronary artery disease. Future trials will be needed to define whether there is a level of LDL-cholesterol beyond which further benefit is not seen or safety concerns emerge.     

Possible Molecular Mechanisms by which Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers (ARBs) Prevent the Development of Atrial Fibrillation in Insulin Resistant Patients

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common disorder of cardiac rhythm and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in general population. A recent community-based observational study revealed that diabetes and/or hypertension were associated with the development of AF. However, there is no definite evidence to show that patients with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk for the development of AF. These findings suggest that hyperglycemia per se may not explain the positive association between diabetes and AF. Growing body of evidence supports the presence of insulin resistance as the fundamental pathophysiological disturbance responsible for the metabolic syndrome, a constellation of metabolic disorders such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity that raise the risk for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases. Further, several clinical trials have shown that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance. These observations suggest that insulin resistance could account for the increased risk for AF in the patients with diabetes and/or hypertension and that the interruption of the RAS may be a promising therapeutic strategy for preventing the development of AF. In the first part of this paper, we review clinical studies to support the concept that angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) could prevent the development of AF in insulin resistant patients and discuss the possible underlying mechanisms. In the second part, we discuss the potential utility of telmisartan, a unique ARB with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma)-modulating activity, for blocking the development of AF in patients with insulin resistance.     

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition as a novel treatment for diabetes mellitus

Both common forms of diabetes have an inflammatory pathogenesis in which immune and metabolic factors converge on interleukin-1β as a key mediator of insulin resistance and β-cell failure. In addition to improving insulin resistance and preventing β-cell inflammatory damage, there is evidence of genetic association between diabetes and histone deacetylases (HDACs); and HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) promote β-cell development, proliferation, differentiation and function and positively affect late diabetic microvascular complications. Here we review this evidence and propose that there is a strong rationale for preclinical studies and clinical trials with the aim of testing the utility of HDACi as a novel therapy for diabetes.