The <Emphasis Type="Italic">Hox8</Emphasis> of the hemichordate <Emphasis Type="Italic">Balanoglossus misakiensis</Emphasis>

Deuterostomes comprise a monophyletic group of animals that include chordates, xenoturbellids, and the Ambulacraria, which consists of echinoderms and hemichordates. The ancestral chordate probably had 14 Hox genes aligned linearly along the chromosome, with the posterior six genes showing an independent duplication compared to protostomes. In contrast, ambulacrarians are characterized by a duplication of the posterior Hox genes, resulting in three genes known as Hox11/13a, Hox11/13b, and Hox11/13c. Here, we isolated 12 Hox genes from the hemichordate Balanoglossus misakiensis and found an extra Hox gene that has not been reported in hemichordates. The extra B. misakiensis gene was suggested to be Hox8 from paralog-characteristic residues in its hexapepetide motif and homeodomain and a comparison with Strongylocentrotus purpuratus Hox genes. Our data suggest that the ancestor of echinoderms and hemichordates may have had a full complement of 12 Hox genes.     

Hox genes and regional patterning of the vertebrate body plan

Several decades have passed since the discovery of Hox genes in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Their unique ability to regulate morphologies along the anteroposterior (AP) axis (Lewis, 1978) earned them well-deserved attention as important regulators of embryonic development. Phenotypes due to loss- and gain-of-function mutations in mouse Hox genes have revealed that the spatio-temporally controlled expression of these genes is critical for the correct morphogenesis of embryonic axial structures. Here, we review recent novel insight into the modalities of Hox protein function in imparting specific identity to anatomical regions of the vertebral column, and in controlling the emergence of these tissues concomitantly with providing them with axial identity. The control of these functions must have been intimately linked to the shaping of the body plan during evolution.     

Non-homeodomain regions of Hox proteins mediate activation versus repression of Six2 via a single enhancer site in vivo

Hox genes control many developmental events along the AP axis, but few target genes have been identified. Whether target genes are activated or repressed, what enhancer elements are required for regulation, and how different domains of the Hox proteins contribute to regulatory specificity are poorly understood. Six2 is genetically downstream of both the Hox11 paralogous genes in the developing mammalian kidney and Hoxa2 in branchial arch and facial mesenchyme. Loss-of-function of Hox11 leads to loss of Six2 expression and loss-of-function of Hoxa2 leads to expanded Six2 expression. Herein we demonstrate that a single enhancer site upstream of the Six2 coding sequence is responsible for both activation by Hox11 proteins in the kidney and repression by Hoxa2 in the branchial arch and facial mesenchyme in vivo. DNA-binding activity is required for both activation and repression, but differential activity is not controlled by differences in the homeodomains. Rather, protein domains N- and C-terminal to the homeodomain confer activation versus repression activity. These data support a model in which the DNA-binding specificity of Hox proteins in vivo may be similar, consistent with accumulated in vitro data, and that unique functions result mainly from differential interactions mediated by non-homeodomain regions of Hox proteins.     

miR-196 regulates axial patterning and pectoral appendage initiation

Vertebrate Hox clusters contain protein-coding genes that regulate body axis development and microRNA (miRNA) genes whose functions are not yet well understood. We overexpressed the Hox cluster microRNA miR-196 in zebrafish embryos and found four specific, viable phenotypes: failure of pectoral fin bud initiation, deletion of the 6th pharyngeal arch, homeotic aberration and loss of rostral vertebrae, and reduced number of ribs and somites. Reciprocally, miR-196 knockdown evoked an extra pharyngeal arch, extra ribs, and extra somites, confirming endogenous roles of miR-196. miR-196 injection altered expression of hox genes and the signaling of retinoic acid through the retinoic acid receptor gene rarab. Knocking down rarab mimicked the pectoral fin phenotype of miR-196 overexpression, and reporter constructs tested in tissue culture and in embryos showed that the rarab 3′UTR is a miR-196 target for pectoral fin bud initiation. These results show that a Hox cluster microRNA modulates development of axial patterning similar to nearby protein-coding Hox genes, and acts on appendicular patterning at least in part by modulating retinoic acid signaling.     

Hox gene expression in larval development of the polychaetes Nereis virens and Platynereis dumerilii (Annelida, Lophotrochozoa)

The bilaterian animals are divided into three great branches: the Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Lophotrochozoa. The evolution of developmental mechanisms is less studied in the Lophotrochozoa than in the other two clades. We have studied the expression of Hox genes during larval development of two lophotrochozoans, the polychaete annelids Nereis virens and Platynereis dumerilii. As reported previously, the Hox cluster of N. virens consists of at least 11 genes (de Rosa R, Grenier JK, Andreeva T, Cook CE, Adoutte A, Akam M, Carroll SB, Balavoine G, Nature, 399:772–776, 1999; Andreeva TF, Cook C, Korchagina NM, Akam M, Dondua AK, Ontogenez 32:225–233, 2001); we have also cloned nine Hox genes of P. dumerilii. Hox genes are mainly expressed in the descendants of the 2d blastomere, which form the integument of segments, ventral neural ganglia, pre-pygidial growth zone, and the pygidial lobe. Patterns of expression are similar for orthologous genes of both nereids. In Nereis, Hox2, and Hox3 are activated before the blastopore closure, while Hox1 and Hox4 are activated just after this. Hox5 and Post2 are first active during the metatrochophore stage, and Hox7, Lox4, and Lox2 at the late nectochaete stage only. During larval stages, Hox genes are expressed in staggered domains in the developing segments and pygidial lobe. The pattern of expression of Hox cluster genes suggests their involvement in the vectorial regionalization of the larval body along the antero-posterior axis. Hox gene expression in nereids conforms to the canonical patterns postulated for the two other evolutionary branches of the Bilateria, the Ecdysozoa and the Deuterostomia, thus supporting the evolutionary conservatism of the function of Hox genes in development. Milana Kulakova, Nadezhda Bakalenko and Elena Novikova contributed equally to this work.     

Lizards possess the most complete tetrapod Hox gene repertoire despite pervasive structural changes in Hox clusters

Hox genes are a remarkable example of conservation in animal development and their nested expression along the head‐to‐tail axis orchestrates embryonic patterning. Early in vertebrate history, two duplications led to the emergence of four Hox clusters (A‐D) and redundancy within paralog groups has been partially accommodated with gene losses. Here we conduct an inventory of squamate Hox genes using the genomes of 10 lizard and 7 snake species. Although the HoxC1 gene has been hypothesized to be lost in the amniote ancestor, we reveal that it is retained in lizards. In contrast, all snakes lack functional HoxC1 and ‐D12 genes. Varying levels of degradation suggest differences in the process of gene loss between the two genes. The vertebrate HoxC1 gene is prone to gene loss and its functional domains are more variable than those of other Hox1 genes. We describe for the first time the HoxC1 expression patterns in tetrapods. HoxC1 is broadly expressed during development in the diencephalon, the neural tube, dorsal root ganglia, and limb buds in two lizard species. Our study emphasizes the value of revisiting Hox gene repertoires by densely sampling taxonomic groups and its feasibility owing to growing sequence resources in evaluating gene repertoires across taxa.     

Genome Duplications and Accelerated Evolution of Hox Genes and Cluster Architecture in Teleost Fishes

The early origin of four vertebrate Hox gene clusters duringthe evolution of gnathostomes was likely caused by two consecutiveduplications of the entire genome and the subsequent loss ofindividual genes. The presumed conserved and important rolesof these genes in tetrapods during development led to the generalassumption that Hox cluster architecture had remained unchangedsince the last common ancestor of all jawed vertebrates. Butrecent data from teleost fishes reveals that this is not thecase. Here, we present an analysis of the evolution of vertebrateHox genes and clusters, with emphasis on the differences betweenthe Hox A clusters of fish (actinopterygian) and tetrapod (sarcopterygian)lineages. In contrast to the general conservation of genomicarchitecture and gene sequence observed in sarcopterygians,the evolutionary history of actinopterygian Hox clusters likelyincludes an additional (third) genome duplication that initiallyincreased the number of clusters from four to eight. We document,for the first time, higher rates of gene loss and gene sequenceevolution in the Hox genes of fishes compared to those of landvertebrates. These two observations might suggest that two differentmolecular evolutionary strategies exist in the two major vertebratelineages. Preliminary data from the African cichlid fish Oreochromisniloticus compared to those of the pufferfish and zebrafishreveal important differences in Hox cluster architecture amongfishes and, together with genetic mapping data from Medaka,indicate that the third genome duplication was not zebrafish-specific,but probably occurred early in the history of fishes. Each descendingfish lineage that has been characterized so far, distinctivelymodified its Hox cluster architecture through independent secondarylosses. This variation is related to the large body plan differencesobserved among fishes, such as the loss of entire sets of appendagesand ribs in some lineages.     

Isolation and expression analysis of a poriferan <Emphasis Type="Italic">Antp</Emphasis>-class <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bar-/Bsh-</Emphasis>like homeobox gene

A novel non-Hox Antp-class gene (BarBsh-Hb) was isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria sp. This gene shares high sequence identity with eumetazoan genes from the Bsh and Bar gene families and can be distinguished from other non-Hox Antp-class genes by diagnostic residues. We also present an alignment of all known (full-length) poriferan non-Hox Antp-class genes. Maximum likelihood methods were employed to estimate phylogenetic relationships among non-Hox genes and BarBsh-Hb. We employed RT-PCR techniques to look at expression across different developmental stages (larval to rhagon). BarBsh-Hb product was present in newly released larvae, but expression was not detected 8–16 h post-release. Expression of BarBsh-Hb was detected in later-stage (>16 h post-release), free-swimming larvae until they settled and attached to the substratum, after which expression was down-regulated. In a separate set of experiments, low levels of expression were observed in normal adult tissue and disaggregated adult tissue, but BarBsh-Hb expression increased during tissue re-aggregation. These data increase the number of non-Hox homeobox genes identified in sponges and provide evidence of regulation of this non-Hox gene during sponge development. While the Bar and Bsh genes play important roles in the development of nervous tissue—especially visual systems—in metazoans, the specific role(s) BarBsh-Hb play(s) in sponge development is unclear and deserves greater attention.Edited by C. Desplan