On your histone mark,SET, methylate!

Lysine methylation of histones and non-histone proteins has emerged in recent years as a posttranslational modification with wide-ranging cellular implications beyond epigenetic regulation. The molecular interactions between lysine methyltransferases and their substrates appear to be regulated by posttranslational modifications surrounding the lysine methyl acceptor. Two very interesting examples of this cross-talk between methyl-lysine sites are found in the SET (Su(var)3–9, Enhancer-of-zeste, Trithorax) domain-containing lysine methyltransferases SET7 and SETDB1, whereby the histone H3 trimethylated on lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) modification prevents methylation by SETDB1 on H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) and the histone H3 trimethylated on lysine 9 (H3K9^me3) modification prevents methylation by SET7 on H3K4. A similar cross-talk between posttranslational modifications regulates the functions of non-histone proteins such as the tumor suppressor p53 and the DNA methyltransferase DNMT1. Herein, in cis effects of acetylation, phosphorylation, as well as arginine and lysine methylation on lysine methylation events will be discussed.     

Application of MassSQUIRM for Quantitative Measurements of Lysine Demethylase Activity

Recently, epigenetic regulators have been discovered as key players in many different diseases ^1-3. As a result, these enzymes are prime targets for small molecule studies and drug development ⁴. Many epigenetic regulators have only recently been discovered and are still in the process of being classified. Among these enzymes are lysine demethylases which remove methyl groups from lysines on histones and other proteins. Due to the novel nature of this class of enzymes, few assays have been developed to study their activity. This has been a road block to both the classification and high throughput study of histone demethylases. Currently, very few demethylase assays exist. Those that do exist tend to be qualitative in nature and cannot simultaneously discern between the different lysine methylation states (un-, mono-, di- and tri-). Mass spectrometry is commonly used to determine demethylase activity but current mass spectrometric assays do not address whether differentially methylated peptides ionize differently. Differential ionization of methylated peptides makes comparing methylation states difficult and certainly not quantitative (Figure 1A). Thus available assays are not optimized for the comprehensive analysis of demethylase activity.Here we describe a method called MassSQUIRM (mass spectrometric quantitation using isotopic reductive methylation) that is based on reductive methylation of amine groups with deuterated formaldehyde to force all lysines to be di-methylated, thus making them essentially the same chemical species and therefore ionize the same (Figure 1B). The only chemical difference following the reductive methylation is hydrogen and deuterium, which does not affect MALDI ionization efficiencies. The MassSQUIRM assay is specific for demethylase reaction products with un-, mono- or di-methylated lysines. The assay is also applicable to lysine methyltransferases giving the same reaction products. Here, we use a combination of reductive methylation chemistry and MALDI mass spectrometry to measure the activity of LSD1, a lysine demethylase capable of removing di- and mono-methyl groups, on a synthetic peptide substrate ⁵. This assay is simple and easily amenable to any lab with access to a MALDI mass spectrometer in lab or through a proteomics facility. The assay has ~8-fold dynamic range and is readily scalable to plate format ⁵.     

The SET8 H4K20 protein lysine methyltransferase has a long recognition sequence covering seven amino acid residues

The SET8 histone lysine methyltransferase, which monomethylates the histone 4 lysine 20 residue plays important roles in cell cycle control and genomic stability. By employing peptide arrays we have shown that it has a long recognition sequence motif covering seven amino acid residues, viz. R¹⁷–H¹⁸–(R¹⁹KY)–K²⁰–(V²¹ILFY)–(L²²FY)–R²³. Celluspots peptide array methylation studies confirmed specific monomethylation of H4K20 and revealed that the symmetric and asymmetric methylation on R¹⁷ of the H4 tail inhibits methylation on H4K20. Similarly, dimethylation of the R located at the −3 position also reduced methylation of p53 K382 which had been shown previously to be methylated by SET8. Based on the derived specificity profile, we identified 4 potential non-histone substrate proteins. After relaxing the specificity profile, we identified several more candidate substrates and showed efficient methylation of 20 novel non-histone peptides by SET8. However, apart from H4 and p53 none of the identified novel peptide targets was methylated at the protein level. Since H4 and p53 both contain the target lysine in an unstructured part of the protein, we conclude that the long recognition sequence of SET8 makes it difficult to methylate a lysine in a folded region of a protein, because amino acid side chains essential for recognition will be buried.     

Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 impairs methylation of histone H3 lysine 9: Regulation of lysine methyltransferases by physical interaction with their substrates

Chromatin is broadly compartmentalized in two defined states: euchromatin and heterochromatin. Generally, euchromatin is trimethylated on histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) while heterochromatin contains the H3K9^me3 mark. The H3K9^me3 modification is added by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) such as SETDB1. Herein, we show that SETDB1 interacts with its substrate H3, but only in the absence of the euchromatic mark H3K4^me3. In addition, we show that SETDB1 fails to methylate substrates containing the H3K4^me3 mark. Likewise, the functionally related H3K9 KMTs G9A, GLP and SUV39H1 also fail to bind and to methylate H3K4^me3 substrates. Accordingly, we provide in vivo evidence that H3K9^me2-enriched histones are devoid of H3K4^me2/3 and that histones depleted of H3K4^me2/3 have elevated H3K9^me2/3. The correlation between the loss of interaction of these KMTs with H3K4^me3 and concomitant methylation impairment leads to the postulate that at least these four KMTs require stable interaction with their respective substrates for optimal activity. Thus, novel substrates could be discovered via the identification of KMT interacting proteins. Indeed, we find that SETDB1 binds to and methylates a novel substrate, the inhibitor of growth protein ING2, while SUV39H1 binds to and methylates the heterochromatin protein HP1α. Thus, our observations suggest a mechanism of post-translational regulation of lysine methylation and propose a potential mechanism for the segregation of the biologically opposing marks, H3K4^me3 and H3K9^me3. Furthermore, the correlation between H3-KMTs interaction and substrate methylation highlights that the identification of novel KMT substrates may be facilitated by the identification of interaction partners.Key words: histone methylation, lysine methyltransferase, H3K4^me3, H3K9^me3, SETDB1, G9A, ING2     

Epigenetic regulation of oogenesis and germ stem cell maintenance by the Drosophila histone methyltransferase Eggless/dSetDB1

The Drosophila melanogaster histone lysine methyltransferase (HKMT) Eggless (Egg/dSETDB1) catalyzes methylation of Histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9), a signature of repressive heterochromatin. Our previous studies showed that H3K9 methylation by Egg is required for oogenesis. Here we analyze a set of EMS-induced mutations in the egg gene, identify the molecular lesions of these mutations, and compare the effects on oogenesis of both strong loss-of-function and weak hypomorphic alleles. These studies show that H3K9 methylation by Egg is required for multiple stages of oogenesis. Mosaic expression experiments show that the egg gene is not required intrinsically in the germ cells for their early differentiation, but is required in the germ cells for their survival past stage 5 of oogenesis. egg is also required in germ stem cells for their maintenance, since egg⁻ germ stem cells initially survive but are not maintained as females age. Mosaic analysis also reveals that the early egg chamber budding defects in egg⁻ ovaries are due to an intrinsic requirement for egg in follicle stem cells and their descendents, and that egg plays a non-autonomous role in somatic cells in the germarium to influence the differentiation of early germ cells.     

Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 impairs methylation of histone H3 lysine 9

Chromatin is broadly compartmentalized in two defined states: euchromatin and heterochromatin. Generally, euchromatin is trimethylated on histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) while heterochromatin contains the H3K9^me3 marks. The H3K9^me3 modification is added by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) such as SETDB1. Herein, we show that SETDB1 interacts with its substrate H3, but only in the absence of the euchromatic mark H3K4^me3. In addition, we show that SETDB1 fails to methylate substrates containing the H3K4^me3 mark. Likewise, the functionally related H3K9 KMTs G9A, GLP, and SUV39H1 also fail to bind and to methylate H3K4^me3 substrates. Accordingly, we provide in vivo evidence that H3K9^me2-enriched histones are devoid of H3K4^me2/3 and that histones depleted of H3K4^me2/3 have elevated H3K9^me2/3. The correlation between the loss of interaction of these KMTs with H3K4^me3 and concomitant methylation impairment leads to the postulate that, at least these four KMTs, require stable interaction with their respective substrates for optimal activity. Thus, novel substrates could be discovered via the identification of KMT interacting proteins. Indeed, we find that SETDB1 binds to and methylates a novel substrate, the inhibitor of growth protein ING2, while SUV39H1 binds to and methylates the heterochromatin protein HP1α. Thus, our observations suggest a mechanism of post-translational regulation of lysine methylation and propose a potential mechanism for the segregation of the biologically opposing marks, H3K4^me3 and H3K9^me3. Furthermore, the correlation between H3-KMTs interaction and substrate methylation highlights that the identification of novel KMT substrates may be facilitated by the identification of interaction partners.     

SUVH1, a Su(var)3–9 family member,promotes the expression of genes targeted by DNA methylation

Transposable elements are found throughout the genomes of all organisms. Repressive marks such as DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation silence these elements and maintain genome integrity. However, how silencing mechanisms are themselves regulated to avoid the silencing of genes remains unclear. Here, an anti-silencing factor was identified using a forward genetic screen on a reporter line that harbors a LUCIFERASE (LUC) gene driven by a promoter that undergoes DNA methylation. SUVH1, a Su(var)3–9 homolog, was identified as a factor promoting the expression of the LUC gene. Treatment with a cytosine methylation inhibitor completely suppressed the LUC expression defects of suvh1, indicating that SUVH1 is dispensable for LUC expression in the absence of DNA methylation. SUVH1 also promotes the expression of several endogenous genes with promoter DNA methylation. However, the suvh1 mutation did not alter DNA methylation levels at the LUC transgene or on a genome-wide scale; thus, SUVH1 functions downstream of DNA methylation. Histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) trimethylation was reduced in suvh1; in contrast, H3K9 methylation levels remained unchanged. This work has uncovered a novel, anti-silencing function for a member of the Su(var)3–9 family that has previously been associated with silencing through H3K9 methylation.     

A lesson learned from the H3.3K27M mutation found in pediatric glioma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in human. Recent studies on high-grade pediatric GBM have identified two recurrent mutations (K27M and G34R/V) in genes encoding histone H3 (H3F3A for H3.3 and HIST1H3B for H3.1).^1,2 The two histone H3 mutations are mutually exclusive and give rise to tumors in different brain compartments.³ Recently, we⁴ and others⁵ have shown that the histone H3 K27M mutation specifically altered the di- and tri-methylation of endogenous histone H3 at Lys27. Genome-wide studies using ChIP-seq on H3.3K27M patient samples indicate a global reduction of H3K27me3 on chromatin. Remarkably, we also found a dramatic enrichment of H3K27me3 and EZH2 (the catalytic subunit H3K27 methyltransferase) at hundreds of gene loci in H3.3K27M patient cells. Here, we discuss potential mechanisms whereby H3K27me3 is enriched at chromatin loci in cells expressing the H3.3K27M mutation and report effects of Lys-to-Met mutations of other well-studied lysine residues of histone H3.1/H3.3 and H4 on the corresponding endogenous lysine methylation. We suggest that mutation(s) on histones may be found in a variety of human diseases, and the expression of mutant histones may help to address the function of histone lysine methylation and possibly other modifications in mammalian cells.     

The Legionella pneumophila Methyltransferase RomA Methylates Also Non-histone Proteins during Infection

RomA is a SET-domain containing protein lysine methyltransferase encoded by the Gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila. It is exported into human host cells during infection and has been previously shown to methylate histone H3 at lysine 14 [Rolando et al. (2013), Cell Host Microbe, 13, 395–405]. Here, we investigated the substrate specificity of RomA on peptide arrays showing that it mainly recognizes a G-K-X-(PA) sequence embedded in a basic amino acid sequence context. Based on the specificity profile, we searched for possible additional RomA substrates in the human proteome and identified 34 novel peptide substrates. For nine of these, the corresponding full-length protein or protein domains could be cloned and purified. Using radioactive and antibody-based methylation assays, we showed that seven of them are methylated by RomA, four of them strongly, one moderately, and two weakly. Mutagenesis confirmed for the seven methylated proteins that methylation occurs at target lysine residues fitting to the specificity profile. Methylation of one novel substrate (AROS) was investigated in HEK293 cells overexpressing RomA and during infection with L. pneumophila. Methylation could be detected in both conditions, confirming that RomA methylates non-histone proteins in human cells. Our data show that the bacterial methyltransferase RomA methylates also human non-histone proteins suggesting a multifaceted role in the infection process.     

Novel N-terminal and Lysine Methyltransferases That Target Translation Elongation Factor 1A in Yeast and Human

Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) is an essential, highly methylated protein that facilitates translational elongation by delivering aminoacyl-tRNAs to ribosomes. Here, we report a new eukaryotic protein N-terminal methyltransferase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae YLR285W, which methylates eEF1A at a previously undescribed high-stoichiometry N-terminal site and the adjacent lysine. Deletion of YLR285W resulted in the loss of N-terminal and lysine methylation in vivo, whereas overexpression of YLR285W resulted in an increase of methylation at these sites. This was confirmed by in vitro methylation of eEF1A by recombinant YLR285W. Accordingly, we name YLR285W as elongation factor methyltransferase 7 (Efm7). This enzyme is a new type of eukaryotic N-terminal methyltransferase as, unlike the three other known eukaryotic N-terminal methyltransferases, its substrate does not have an N-terminal [A/P/S]-P-K motif. We show that the N-terminal methylation of eEF1A is also present in human; this conservation over a large evolutionary distance suggests it to be of functional importance. This study also reports that the trimethylation of Lys⁷⁹ in eEF1A is conserved from yeast to human. The methyltransferase responsible for Lys⁷⁹ methylation of human eEF1A is shown to be N6AMT2, previously documented as a putative N(6)-adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase. It is the direct ortholog of the recently described yeast Efm5, and we show that Efm5 and N6AMT2 can methylate eEF1A from either species in vitro. We therefore rename N6AMT2 as eEF1A-KMT1. Including the present work, yeast eEF1A is now documented to be methylated by five different methyltransferases, making it one of the few eukaryotic proteins to be extensively methylated by independent enzymes. This implies more extensive regulation of eEF1A by this posttranslational modification than previously appreciated.Protein methylation is emerging as one of the most prominent posttranslational modifications in the eukaryotic cell (1). Often showing high evolutionary conservation, it is increasingly recognized for its role in modulating protein–protein interactions (2). Indeed, it has been documented in protein interaction codes (3), such as those of the histones and p53 (4, 5), where it shows interplay with modifications such as acetylation and phosphorylation. Despite this, there remains a paucity of understanding of the enzymes that catalyze protein methylation. Many of the known methyltransferases target histones. However, many other methyltransferases have been discovered recently that act on nonhistone proteins (6).While protein methylation predominantly occurs on lysine and arginine residues, it is also known to occur on glutamine, asparagine, glutamate, histidine, cysteine, and the N- and C termini of proteins. Although the presence of N-terminal methylation on numerous proteins has been known for decades (7), the first enzymes responsible for this methylation have only recently been discovered (8, 9). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Tae1 and its human ortholog N-terminal methyltransferase 1 (NTMT1) catalyze N-terminal methylation of proteins with an N-terminal [A/P/S]-P-K motif (after methionine removal). Yet there is evidence that these enzymes may recognize a more general N-terminal motif (10). Human NTMT2 is a monomethyltransferase that methylates the same substrates as NTMT1 and may prime substrate proteins with monomethylation to assist subsequent trimethylation by NTMT1 (11).The biological function of N-terminal methylation on some proteins has been recently revealed. For example, N-terminal methylation of regulator of chromatin condensation protein 1 (RCC1) is known to affect its binding to chromatin and thereby the correct chromosomal segregation during mitosis (12, 13), and N-terminal methylation of DNA damage-binding protein 2 (DDB2) is important for its role in UV-damaged DNA repair (14). Interestingly, there is evidence of interplay between N-terminal methylation and other posttranslational modifications (15), suggesting that, like lysine and arginine methylation, it may be incorporated into protein interaction codes (3). N-terminal methylation therefore appears to be a modification of functional importance in the cell.Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), and its bacterial ortholog EF-Tu, is an essential translation elongation factor that is found in all living organisms. Its canonical function is in facilitating delivery of aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosome; however, it is also known to have a role in many other cellular functions, such as actin bundling, nuclear export, and proteasomal degradation (16). A number of methyltransferases have been discovered in both S. cerevisiae and human that target translation elongation factors. In yeast, four of these elongation factor methyltransferases (EFMs) act on eEF1A, namely Efm1, Efm4, Efm5, and Efm6, generating monomethylated Lys³⁰, dimethylated Lys³¹⁶, trimethylated Lys⁷⁹, and monomethylated Lys³⁹⁰, respectively (17–19). Human METTL10 is the ortholog of Efm4 in that it trimethylates eEF1A at Lys³¹⁸, which is equivalent to Lys³¹⁶ in yeast (20). Interestingly, eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) is also methylated by a number of lysine methyltransferases. In yeast, Efm2 and Efm3 act on eEF2, generating dimethylated Lys⁶¹³ and trimethylated Lys⁵⁰⁹, respectively (21–24). Human eEF2-KMT is the ortholog of Efm3 in that it trimethylates eEF2 at Lys⁵²⁵, which is equivalent to Lys⁵⁰⁹ in yeast eEF2 (23).Here, we report the N-terminal methylation of eEF1A in S. cerevisiae and the identification of the methyltransferase that catalyzes this event. Using parallel reaction monitoring and MS/MS/MS (MS3), we unambiguously localize the modification to the N-terminal glycine and show it is conserved in the human cell. We also show that YLR285W, which we rename elongation factor methyltransferase 7 (Efm7), is responsible for this modification in yeast, as well as dimethylation at the adjacent lysine. We also characterize the methyltransferases responsible for methylation of lysine 79 in eEF1A. Human N6AMT2 is shown to be the ortholog of yeast Efm5 through its capacity to methylate yeast and human eEF1A at Lys⁷⁹ in vitro. We therefore rename N6AMT2 as eEF1A-KMT1.     

Detection of Histone Modifications in Plant Leaves

Chromatin structure is important for the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. In this process, chromatin remodeling, DNA methylation, and covalent modifications on the amino-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 play essential roles^1-2. H3 and H4 histone modifications include methylation of lysine and arginine, acetylation of lysine, and phosphorylation of serine residues^1-2. These modifications are associated either with gene activation, repression, or a primed state of gene that supports more rapid and robust activation of expression after perception of appropriate signals (microbe-associated molecular patterns, light, hormones, etc.)^3-7. Here, we present a method for the reliable and sensitive detection of specific chromatin modifications on selected plant genes. The technique is based on the crosslinking of (modified) histones and DNA with formaldehyde^8,9, extraction and sonication of chromatin, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with modification-specific antibodies^9,10, de-crosslinking of histone-DNA complexes, and gene-specific real-time quantitative PCR. The approach has proven useful for detecting specific histone modifications associated with C₄ photosynthesis in maize^5,11 and systemic immunity in Arabidopsis³.     

Arginine and Lysine Aminopeptidase Activities in Chromaffin Granules of Bovine Adrenal Medulla: Relevance to Prohormone Processing

Abstract: Conversion of prohormones and neuropeptide precursors to smaller, biologically active peptides requires specific proteolytic processing at paired basic residues, which generates intermediate peptides with NH₂ and COOH termini extended with Lys or Arg residues. These basic residues are then removed by aminopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activities, respectively. Among the proteases involved in prohormone processing, the basic residue aminopeptidase activity has not been well studied. This report demonstrates arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities detected with Arg-methylcoumarinamide (Arg-MCA) and Lys-MCA substrates in neurosecretory vesicles of bovine adrenal medulla [chromaffin granules (CG)], which contain endoproteolytic processing enzymes co-localized with [Met]-enkephalin and other neuropeptides. These arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities showed many similarities and some differences. Both arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities were stimulated by the reducing agent β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) and inhibited by p-hydroxymercuribenzoate, suggesting involvement of reduced cysteinyl residues. The arginine aminopeptidase activity was stimulated by NaCl (150 mM), but the lysine aminopeptidase activity was minimally affected. Moreover, characteristic β-ME/NaCl-stimulated Arg-MCA cleaving activity and β-ME-stimulated Lys-MCA cleaving activity were detected only in CG and not in other subcellular fractions; these findings indicate the localization of these particular basic residue aminopeptidase activities to secretory vesicles. The arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities showed pH optima at 6.7 and 7.0, respectively. K_m(app) values for the arginine and lysine aminopeptidase activities were 104 and 160 µM, respectively. Inhibition by the aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin, amastatin, and arphamenine was observed for Arg-MCA and Lys-MCA cleaving activities. Inhibition by the metal ion chelators indicated that metalloproteases were involved; Co²⁺ stimulated the arginine aminopeptidase activity but was less effective in stimulating lysine aminopeptidase activity. In addition, the lysine aminopeptidase activity was partially inhibited by Ni²⁺ and Zn²⁺ (1 mM), whereas the arginine aminopeptidase activity was minimally affected. These results demonstrate the presence of related arginine and lysine thiol metalloaminopeptidase activities in CG that may participate in prohormone processing.     

Selenium-Based S-Adenosylmethionine Analog Reveals the Mammalian Seven-Beta-Strand Methyltransferase METTL10 to Be an EF1A1 Lysine Methyltransferase

Lysine methylation has been extensively studied in histones, where it has been shown to provide specific epigenetic marks for the regulation of gene expression; however, the molecular mechanism and physiological function of lysine methylation in proteins other than histones remains to be fully addressed. To better understand the substrate diversity of lysine methylation, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) derivatives with alkyne-moieties have been synthesized. A selenium-based SAM analog, propargylic Se-adenosyl-l-selenomethionine (ProSeAM), has a wide spectrum of reactivity against various lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) with sufficient stability to support enzymatic reactions in vitro. By using ProSeAM as a chemical probe for lysine methylation, we identified substrates for two seven-beta-strand KMTs, METTL21A and METTL10, on a proteomic scale in mammalian cells. METTL21A has been characterized as a heat shock protein (HSP)-70 methyltransferase. Mammalian METTL10 remains functionally uncharacterized, although its ortholog in yeast, See1, has been shown to methylate the translation elongation factor eEF1A. By using ProSeAM-mediated alkylation followed by purification and quantitative MS analysis, we confirmed that METTL21A labels HSP70 family proteins. Furthermore, we demonstrated that METTL10 also methylates the eukaryotic elongation factor EF1A1 in mammalian cells. Subsequent biochemical characterization revealed that METTL10 specifically trimethylates EF1A1 at lysine 318 and that siRNA-mediated knockdown of METTL10 decreases EF1A1 methylation levels in vivo. Thus, our study emphasizes the utility of the synthetic cofactor ProSeAM as a chemical probe for the identification of non-histone substrates of KMTs.     

Engineering of Methylation State Specific 3xMBT Domain Using ELISA Screening

The ε-amino group of lysine residues may be mono-, di- or tri-methylated by protein lysine methyltransferases. In the past few years it has been highly considered that methylation of both histone and non-histone proteins has fundamental role in development and progression of various human diseases. Thus, the establishment of tools to study lysine methylation that will distinguish between the different states of methylation is required to elucidate their cellular functions. The 3X malignant brain tumor domain (3XMBT) repeats of the Lethal(3)malignant brain tumor-like protein 1 (L3MBTL1) have been utilized in the past as an affinity reagent for the identification of mono- and di-methylated lysine residues on individual proteins and on a proteomic scale. Here, we have utilized the 3XMBT domain to develop an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that allows the high-throughput detection of 3XMBT binding to methylated lysines. We demonstrated that this system allows the detection of methylated peptides, methylated proteins and PKMT activity on both peptides and proteins. We also optimized the assay to detect 3XMBT binding in crude E. coli lysates which facilitated the high throughput screening of 3XMBT mutant libraries. We have utilized protein engineering tools and generated a double site saturation 3XMBT library of residues 361 and 411 that were shown before to be important for binding mono and di-methylated substrates and identified variants that can exclusively recognize only di-methylated peptides. Together, our results demonstrate a powerful new approach that will contribute to deeper understanding of lysine methylation biology and that can be utilized for the engineering of domains for specific binders of other post-translational modifications.     

Biological significance of methylated derivatives of lysine and arginine.

It has been shown by biological trials that L-lysine and L-arginine are essential for the undisturbed growth of living organisms. These amino acids show different reactivity in the molecular processes of the cell which explains their antagonistic function. As a result of enzymatic methylation the N-? as well as N^G-methylated derivatives of lysine and arginine are produced. The biological function of the methylated basic amino acids is almost unknown. Some N-?-methylated lysines, but first of all N-?-trimethyl lysine /TML/ exhibits a proliferation promoting effect on several normal and neoplastic cell systems. N^G-methylated arginines proved to have a proliferation inhibiting effect. Thus, methylation of basic amino acids may have a special significance in the regulation of cell proliferation.     

Enhanced crystal packing due to solvent reorganization through reductive methylation of lysine residues in oxidoreductase from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Streptococcus pneumoniae</Emphasis>

Protein crystallization is in part driven by the changes in the entropy of the system, but opinions differ as to whether the solute (protein) or solvent (water) molecules make more of a contribution to the overall entropic change. Methylation of lysine residues in proteins has been used to enhance protein crystallization. We investigated using molecular dynamics simulations with explicit solvent molecules, the behavior of several native proteins and their methylated counterparts chosen from an earlier large-scale study. Methylated lysines are capable of making a variety of interactions including H-bonds with protein residues and solvent. We demonstrate that methylation on the lysine slightly increases its side chain conformational entropy by about 3.5 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹. Analysis of the radial and spatial distributions of the water molecules around the methylated lysine surface in oxidoreductase from Streptococcus pneumoniae revealed a larger sphere of water molecules with low entropy, as compared with solvent associated with unmethylated lysine. If methylated lysine were to make interactions at the protein–protein interface, the low-entropy water molecules associated with methylated lysines would be released, resulting in a gain of entropy. We show that this gain more than compensates for the loss of protein entropy. Therefore, we propose that lysine methylation favors the formation of crystals through solvent entropic gain.     

Methylation of lysine residues of histone fractions in synchronized mommalian cells

Synchronized cultures of mammalian cells were labeled with ¹⁴C-methyl methionine. Labeled methionine methyl groups were incorporated into certain histone fractions, forming methyl lysine. Incorporation of labeled methyl group into histone fractions as ¹⁴C-methyl lysine was followed through the cell cycle from late G₁ into early M. The ¹⁴C-methyl lysine contents of fractions F2a and F3 began to rise in S and reached maxima after termination of DNA and histone synthesis, coincident with the beginning of mitosis, and began to fall by mid-M. The ¹⁴C-methyl lysine content of fraction F2b rose to a maximum early in S, coincident with initiation of DNA synthesis, and rapidly decreased to its original unmethylated level by late S. Fraction F1 remained unmethylated during the period G₁-M. Evidence is presented to demonstrate differential methylation of histone fractions and to substantiate differential temporal coupling of the methylation of specific histone fractions with histone and DNA biosynthesis.