Telomeres expand sphere of influence: emerging molecular impact of telomeres in non-telomeric functions

Although the impact of telomeres on physiology stands well established, a question remains: how do telomeres impact cellular functions at a molecular level? This is because current understanding limits the influence of telomeres to adjacent subtelomeric regions despite the wide-ranging impact of telomeres. Emerging work in two distinct aspects offers opportunities to bridge this gap. First, telomere-binding factors were found with non-telomeric functions. Second, locally induced DNA secondary structures called G-quadruplexes are notably abundant in telomeres, and gene regulatory regions genome wide. Many telomeric factors bind to G-quadruplexes for non-telomeric functions. Here we discuss a more general model of how telomeres impact the non-telomeric genome – through factors that associate at telomeres and genome wide – and influence cell-intrinsic functions, particularly aging, cancer, and pluripotency.     

The ends and the middle: putting chromosomes together

The three known classes of eukaryotic telomeres share the requirement for an RNA template in their replication. This RNA-templated replication is subject to species-specific differences, such as telomere length and its regulation, which suggest that telomeres may have acquired different additional functions in different organisms. Centromeres show less conservation than do telomeres.     

On the chromatin structure of eukaryotic telomeres

Telomeres prevent chromosome fusions and degradation by exonucleases and are implicated in DNA repair, homologous recombination, chromosome pairing and segregation. All these functions of telomeres require the integrity of their chromatin structure, which has been traditionally considered as heterochromatic. In agreement with this idea, different studies have reported that telomeres associate with heterochromatic marks. However, these studies addressed simultaneously the chromatin structures of telomeres and subtelomeric regions or the chromatin structure of telomeres and Interstitial Telomeric Sequences (ITSs). The independent analysis of Arabidopsis telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs has allowed the discovery of euchromatic telomeres. In Arabidopsis, whereas subtelomeric regions and ITSs associate with heterochromatic marks, telomeres exhibit euchromatic features. We think that this scenario could be found in other model systems if the chromatin organizations of telomeres, subtelomeric regions and ITSs are independently analyzed.     

Cytological and functional aspects of telomere maintenance

The fact that eukaryotic chromosomes are linear poses a special problem for their maintenance: the natural ends of chromosomes must be distinguished from ends generated by chromosomal breakage and somehow, the chromosome ends must also be fully replicated to maintain their integrity. Telomeres, the complex structures at the ends of chromosomes are thought to be instrumental for both of these functions. However, recent insights in telomere biology suggest that these terminal structures do much more than just fulfill these two basic functions. Cytological data demonstrate that telomeres may play leading roles in chromatin organization and nuclear architecture during mitosis and meiosis. Moreover, non-functional telomeres may lead to genetic instability, a common prelude to cancer. Here, we review the basic functions of telomeres during chromosome replication and discuss the cytological aspects of telomere function during mitosis and meiosis.     

Different mechanisms of telomere length regulation

Eukaryotic chromosomes are linear and have their, ends formed by DNA-protein structures, telomeres. At present more and more facts demonstrate the diversity of telomere functions. Telomeres protect the chromosome ends from degradation, fusion, recombination, and from the repair system that recognizes nicks in DNA strands. As shown recently, shortening of the telomeres is a cause of cell aging. In most organisms, telomeres are elongated by means of a special ribonucleoprotein complex; however, in some insects this takes place by either gene conversion or transposition of mobile elements. Evolutionary relations between different types of telomeres are discussed.     

Telomere transitions in yeast: the end of the chromosome as we know it

Telomere functions vary as the cell cycle progresses. Recent results highlight fluctuating associations between telomeres and DNA polymerases, DNA-damage repair proteins, and centrosome components. These associations reflect diverse roles of telomeres in chromosome maintenance and in the orchestration of chromosome movements during meiosis.     

Isolation and characterization of a human telomere.

A method is described that allows cloning of human telomeres in S. cerevisiae by joining human telomeric restriction fragments to yeast artificial chromosome halves. The resulting chimeric yeast-human chromosomes propagate as true linear chromosomes, demonstrating that the human telomere structure is capable of functioning in yeast and suggesting that telomere functions are evolutionarily conserved between yeast and human. One cloned human telomere, yHT1, contains 4 kb of human genomic DNA sequence next to the tandemly repeating TTAGGG hexanucleotide. Genomic hybridizations using both cloned DNA and TTAGGG repeats have revealed a common structural organization of human telomeres. This 4 kb of genomic DNA sequence is present in most, but not all, human telomeres, suggesting that the region is not involved in crucial chromosome-specific functions. However, the extent of common features among the human telomeres and possible similarities in organization with yeast telomeres suggest that this region may play a role in general chromosome behavior such as telomere-telomere interactions. Unlike the simple telomeric TTAGGG repeats, our cloned human genomic DNA sequence does not cross-hybridize with rodent DNA. Thus, this clone allows the identifications of the terminal restriction fragments of specific human chromosomes in human-rodent hybrid cells.     

Targeting telomeres to enforce cancer cells to senesce

The telomeres protect the end of chromosomes from being recognized and processed as an accidental double stranded break. In human somatic cells, telomeres shorten progressively with every round of DNA replication, leading to dysfunctional telomeres that trigger cellular senescence or apoptosis depending on the cell type. This telomere erosion appears to play a role in cell renewal, ageing and cancer. Two recent studies demonstrated in mouse that eroded telomeres in cancer cells blocked for apoptosis limit cancer formation by triggering senescence. These results suggest that provoking senescence may provide a way to cure cancer and point to new therapeutical strategies targeting specific telomeric functions. Nevertheless, an important question remains unanswered: does replicative senescence limit tumor formation in human?     

Telomere end-binding proteins control the formation of G-quadruplex DNA structures in vivo

Telomere end-binding proteins (TEBPs) bind to the guanine-rich overhang (G-overhang) of telomeres. Although the DNA binding properties of TEBPs have been investigated in vitro, little is known about their functions in vivo. Here we use RNA interference to explore in vivo functions of two ciliate TEBPs, TEBPalpha and TEBPbeta. Silencing the expression of genes encoding both TEBPs shows that they cooperate to control the formation of an antiparallel guanine quadruplex (G-quadruplex) DNA structure at telomeres in vivo. This function seems to depend on the role of TEBPalpha in attaching telomeres in the nucleus and in recruiting TEBPbeta to these sites. In vitro DNA binding and footprinting studies confirm the in vivo observations and highlight the role of the C terminus of TEBPbeta in G-quadruplex formation. We have also found that G-quadruplex formation in vivo is regulated by the cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of TEBPbeta.     

Telomere rapid deletion regulates telomere length in Arabidopsis thaliana

Telomere length is maintained in species-specific equilibrium primarily through a competition between telomerase-mediated elongation and the loss of terminal DNA through the end-replication problem. Recombinational activities are also capable of both lengthening and shortening telomeres. Here we demonstrate that elongated telomeres in Arabidopsis Ku70 mutants reach a new length set point after three generations. Restoration of wild-type Ku70 in these mutants leads to discrete telomere-shortening events consistent with telomere rapid deletion (TRD). These findings imply that the longer telomere length set point is achieved through competition between overactive telomerase and TRD. Surprisingly, in the absence of telomerase, a subset of elongated telomeres was further lengthened, suggesting that in this background a mechanism of telomerase-independent lengthening of telomeres operates. Unexpectedly, we also found that plants possessing wild-type-length telomeres exhibit TRD when telomerase is inactivated. TRD is stochastic, and all chromosome ends appear to be equally susceptible. The frequency of TRD decreases as telomeres shorten; telomeres less than 2 kb in length are rarely subject to TRD. We conclude that TRD functions as a potent force to regulate telomere length in Arabidopsis.     

Chromatin regulation and non-coding RNAs at mammalian telomeres

In eukaryotes, terminal chromosome repeats are bound by a specialized nucleoprotein complex that controls telomere length and protects chromosome ends from DNA repair and degradation. In mammals the “shelterin” complex mediates these central functions at telomeres. In the recent years it has become evident that also the heterochromatic structure of mammalian telomeres is implicated in telomere length regulation. Impaired telomeric chromatin compaction results in a loss of telomere length control. Progressive telomere shortening affects chromatin compaction at telomeric and subtelomeric repeats and activates alternative telomere maintenance mechanisms. Dynamics of chromatin structure of telomeres during early mammalian development and nuclear reprogramming further indicates a central role of telomeric heterochromatin in organismal development. In addition, the recent discovery that telomeres are transcribed, giving rise to UUAGGG-repeat containing TelRNAs/TERRA, opens a new level of chromatin regulation at telomeres. Understanding the links between the epigenetic status of telomeres, TERRA/TelRNA and telomere homeostasis will open new avenues for our understanding of organismal development, cancer and ageing.     

Telomeres and telomerase dance to the rhythm of the cell cycle

The stability of the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes is ensured by functional telomeres, which are composed of short, species-specific direct repeat sequences. The maintenance of telomeres depends on a specialized ribonucleoprotein (RNP) called telomerase. Both telomeres and telomerase are dynamic entities with different physical behaviors and, given their substrate-enzyme relation, they must establish a productive interaction. Regulatory mechanisms controlling this interaction are key missing elements in our understanding of telomere functions. Here, we review the dynamic properties of telomeres and the maturing telomerase RNPs, and summarize how tracking the timing of their dance during the cell cycle will yield insights into chromosome stability mechanisms. Cancer cells often display loss of genome integrity; therefore, these issues are of particular interest for our understanding of cancer initiation or progression.     

Chromosome ends: different sequences may provide conserved functions

The structures of specific chromosome regions, centromeres and telomeres, present a number of puzzles. As functions performed by these regions are ubiquitous and essential, their DNA, proteins and chromatin structure are expected to be conserved. Recent studies of centromeric DNA from human, Drosophila and plant species have demonstrated that a hidden universal centromere-specific sequence is highly unlikely. The DNA of telomeres is more conserved consisting of a tandemly repeated 6-8 bp Arabidopsis-like sequence in a majority of organisms as diverse as protozoan, fungi, mammals and plants. However, there are alternatives to short DNA repeats at the ends of chromosomes and for telomere elongation by telomerase. Here we focus on the similarities and diversity that exist among the structural elements, DNA sequences and proteins, that make up terminal domains (telomeres and subtelomeres), and how organisms use these in different ways to fulfil the functions of end-replication and end-protection.     

Recent expansion of the telomeric complex in rodents: Two distinct POT1 proteins protect mouse telomeres

Human telomeres are protected by shelterin, a complex that includes the POT1 single-stranded DNA binding protein. We found that mouse telomeres contain two POT1 paralogs, POT1a and POT1b, and we used conditional deletion to determine their function. Double-knockout cells showed that POT1a/b are required to prevent a DNA damage signal at chromosome ends, endoreduplication, and senescence. In contrast, POT1a/b were largely dispensable for repression of telomere fusions. Single knockouts and complementation experiments revealed that POT1a and POT1b have distinct functions. POT1a, but not POT1b, was required to repress a DNA damage signal at telomeres. Conversely, POT1b, but not POT1a, had the ability to regulate the amount of single-stranded DNA at the telomere terminus. We conclude that mouse telomeres require two distinct POT1 proteins whereas human telomeres have one. Such divergence is unprecedented in mammalian chromosome biology and has implications for modeling human telomere biology in mice.     

Human telomeres contain at least three types of G-rich repeat distributed non-randomly.

Using a combination of different oligonucleotides and restriction enzymes we have examined the gross organisation of repeats within the most distal region of human chromosomes. We demonstrate here that human telomeres do not contain a pure uniform 6 base pair repeat unit but that there are at least three types of repeat. These three types of repeat are present at the ends of most or all human chromosomes. The distribution of each type of repeat appears to be non-random. Each human telomere has a similar arrangement of these repeats relative to the ends of the chromosome. This could reflect differences in the functions that they perform, or might result from the mutation and correction processes occurring at human telomeres. The number of repeat units, the repeat types and arrangement differs at mouse telomeres. Analysing the change in length of the telomeric repeat region between an individuals blood and germline DNA reveals that this is due to variable amounts of the TTAGGG repeat and not the other repeat types. This organization of repeat units at human telomeres will only be confirmed upon the isolation and sequencing of full length (10-15 kb), intact human telomeres.     

SIRT1 contributes to telomere maintenance and augments global homologous recombination

Yeast Sir2 deacetylase is a component of the silent information regulator (SIR) complex encompassing Sir2/Sir3/Sir4. Sir2 is recruited to telomeres through Rap1, and this complex spreads into subtelomeric DNA via histone deacetylation. However, potential functions at telomeres for SIRT1, the mammalian orthologue of yeast Sir2, are less clear. We studied both loss of function (SIRT1 deficient) and gain of function (SIRT1(super)) mouse models. Our results indicate that SIRT1 is a positive regulator of telomere length in vivo and attenuates telomere shortening associated with aging, an effect dependent on telomerase activity. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we find that SIRT1 interacts with telomeric repeats in vivo. In addition, SIRT1 overexpression increases homologous recombination throughout the entire genome, including telomeres, centromeres, and chromosome arms. These findings link SIRT1 to telomere biology and global DNA repair and provide new mechanistic explanations for the known functions of SIRT1 in protection from DNA damage and some age-associated pathologies.     

At Short Telomeres Tel1 Directs Early Replication and Phosphorylates Rif1

The replication time of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres responds to TG_1–3 repeat length, with telomeres of normal length replicating late during S phase and short telomeres replicating early. Here we show that Tel1 kinase, which is recruited to short telomeres, specifies their early replication, because we find a tel1Δ mutant has short telomeres that nonetheless replicate late. Consistent with a role for Tel1 in driving early telomere replication, initiation at a replication origin close to an induced short telomere was reduced in tel1Δ cells, in an S phase blocked by hydroxyurea. The telomeric chromatin component Rif1 mediates late replication of normal telomeres and is a potential substrate of Tel1 phosphorylation, so we tested whether Tel1 directs early replication of short telomeres by inactivating Rif1. A strain lacking both Rif1 and Tel1 behaves like a rif1Δ mutant by replicating its telomeres early, implying that Tel1 can counteract the delaying effect of Rif1 to control telomere replication time. Proteomic analyses reveals that in yku70Δ cells that have short telomeres, Rif1 is phosphorylated at Tel1 consensus sequences (S/TQ sites), with phosphorylation of Serine-1308 being completely dependent on Tel1. Replication timing analysis of a strain mutated at these phosphorylation sites, however, suggested that Tel1-mediated phosphorylation of Rif1 is not the sole mechanism of replication timing control at telomeres. Overall, our results reveal two new functions of Tel1 at shortened telomeres: phosphorylation of Rif1, and specification of early replication by counteracting the Rif1-mediated delay in initiation at nearby replication origins.