UV inducible UV protection and mutation functions on the I group plasmid TP110

Summary The UV protection and mutation properties of the I group plasmid TP110 have been investigated. It is demonstrated that the genes responsible for these effects are able to complement the deficiency in umuC36 mutants of E. coli, as are the similar genes carried by the B group plasmid R16. Mu-lac inserts into TP110 have been isolated which abolish the UV protection and mutation functions. Restriction mapping of these inserts locates them within a single region of the genome. A comparison of the restriction sites of this region with the muc region of pKM101 reveals very little similarity. Expression of -galactosidase in those Mu-lac inserts in which the lacZ gene is fused to the promoter for the protection and mutation functions is inducible by DNA damaging agents, and induction in mutant strains suggests that these genes are under the direct control of the lexA repressor.     

UV and children's skin

There is indicative epidemiological evidence that exposures of children younger than about 10 years are linked with an increased risk of the development of malignant melanoma as well as non-melanocytic skin cancers later in life. However, an important area of uncertainty relates to lack of knowledge of the sun-sensitivity of children's skin both absolutely and relative to that of adult's skin. For example the thickness of children's skin is very similar to that of adults but due to the nature of the anatomical structure of children's skin, there are indications of children's skin being adversely exposed on the top of the papilla before a significant exposure manifests itself as visible damage to the skin (for example erythema). This might also affect the induction of heavily UV-damaged cells persisting in the basal layer of the epidermis after UV-exposure which are supposed to be keratinocytic epidermal stem cells and may characterize an initiation step of non-melanoncytic skin cancer. For malignant melanoma the number of nevi received in dependence of UV-exposure in childhood is a clear risk factor. Recent data show that the bulge region of hair follicles hosting melanocytic stem cells are located deeper (more protected) in the skin in adults (terminal hair) as compared to pre-pubertal children (vellus hair). This may be an explanation for enhanced risk of malignant melanoma due to UV-exposure in pre-pubertal childhood.     

UV and melanoma: the TP53 link

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a major risk factor for melanoma development, but it has been unclear exactly how UVR leads to melanomagenesis. In a recent publication in Nature, Viros et al. identify TP53/Trp53 as a UVR-target gene in melanoma and show that UVR-induced TP53/Trp53 mutations accelerate BRAF(V600E)-driven melanomagenesis.Melanoma is the deadliest skin cancer, and its incidence has relentlessly increased over recent decades. According to the American Cancer Society''s estimates for melanoma in the United States for 2014, about 76 100 new melanomas will be diagnosed and about 9 710 people are expected to die from melanoma. It is well known that UVR is the major environmental factor contributing to melanomagenesis¹. This suggests that there is at least a component of melanoma risk which may be preventable through UVR protective strategies — an issue of immense public health importance due to the availability of sunblocks and sun-safe behaviors. Importantly, while many studies have been conducted to elucidate the link between UVR and melanoma, the precise molecular mechanism(s) by which UVR triggers melanoma formation have remained incompletely understood.Recently, a powerful UVR-induced skin inflammatory response has been shown to provoke metastasis of melanoma² and the presence of UV signature mutations has also been reported throughout the melanoma exome, including recurrent melanoma genes such as RAC1, PPP6C, and STK19^3,4. Previous mouse models for UVR-induced melanoma revealed that UVR-induced inflammation promoted melanomagenesis in neonatal mice^5,6,7. These studies underlined UVR''s significant contribution to melanoma formation. In a recent study published in Nature, Viros et al.⁸ address the role of UVR in previously established BRAF(V600E)-expressing melanocytes in vivo, and demonstrate that significantly accelerated melanoma formation often associated with mutations in TP53/Trp53. To mimic both somatic mutation acquisition and mild sunburn in humans, BRAF(V600E) was expressed at physiological levels in adult mice which were subsequently exposed to repeated low doses of UVR. In addition, certain mice were partially covered with UVR-proof cloth or topically treated with SunSense Milk Sunscreen SPF50 (2.2 mg/cm²) 30 min before UVR exposure, to assess the impact of these protective strategies.UVR was seen to significantly accelerate melanoma formation in mice whose melanocytes express BRAF(V600E), but not in BRAF wild-type mice (which unlike BRAF(V600E)-expressing mice do not develop long latency melanomas independently of UVR). Application of UVR-proof cloth or sunscreen delayed the onset of UVR-driven melanoma and partially prevented acceleration of BRAF(V600E)-driven melanomagenesis by UVR, and sunscreen-protected UVR-exposed BRAF(V600E) mice developed a reduced number of melanomas compared with unprotected UVR-exposed BRAF(V600E) mice (Figure 1). More somatic single nucleotide variants and a significantly higher proportion of C-to-T transitions at the 3′ end of pyrimidine dimers were observed in UVR-exposed melanomas, providing direct evidence of UVR-induced DNA damage. In addition, Trp53 mutations (H39Y, S124F, R245C, R270C, C272G) were detected in UVR-exposed BRAF(V600E) mouse melanomas, indicating a direct role of UVR in the induction of Trp53 mutations in melanoma. The mutated corresponding residues (S127F/S124F, R248C/R245C, R273C/R270C, C275G/C272G) were also identified in TP53 mutations in human melanoma, suggesting that TP53 mutations are linked to evidence of UVR-induced DNA damage in human melanoma. These results are consistent with previous reports that p53 deletion accelerates BRAF(V600E)-driven melanomagenesis both in mice⁹ and in zebrafish¹⁰, but demonstrate the ability of UVR to inflict UV signature mutations within the gene as has been widely observed in non-melanoma skin cancers and also in human melanomas.Open in a separate windowFigure 1A diagram depicting feasible routes of BRAF(V600E)-driven melanomagenesis.This elegant study by Viros et al. clearly helps to establish key roles of UVR in melanomagenesis, and further validates the functional importance of TP53 as a UVR-targeted tumor suppressor gene in a fraction of melanomas. The study also raises several intriguing questions worthy of follow-up analysis. For example, through which mechanism(s) did sunscreen or sunshielding delay but not prevent UVR-induced melanoma? Induction of cutaneous inflammatory changes that are less anatomically restricted to UV irradiated fields, would seem to be an attractive mechanism. This may help to explain the known risk of melanoma in both sun-exposed and less-exposed skin of lightly pigmented people. It is also valuable to better understand the role of UVB vs UVA wavelengths in melanomagenesis. Mechanistically, these distinct regions of the UV spectrum inflict largely distinctive chemical alterations on the genome. Efforts to block UVA as well as UVB in commercial sunscreen products are currently being promoted by the US Food and Drug Administration, a welcome improvement to sun protection strategies. Still, the precise role(s) of UVA in melanomagenesis remain incompletely understood and may involve both cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous targets. In addition to the acceleration of BRAF(V600E)-driven melanoma formation by UVR, red pigment (pheomelanin) has also been observed to accelerate BRAF(V600E)-driven melanomagenesis even in the absence of UVR¹¹. Pheomelanin has been identified as an intrinsic risk factor for melanoma with the red pigment itself producing reactive oxygen species that cause DNA damage in the skin, and consequently promote melanomagenesis independently of UVR. UVR likely exacerbates red pigment-induced BRAF(V600E)-driven melanoma, and still remains as a major contributor to melanomagenesis. Therefore, along with UV shielding by sunscreens, further preventative strategies should be investigated to diminish UVR-independent melanoma risk mechanisms.Viros et al. provide intriguing answers to several controversial questions regarding melanomagenesis: Does UVR really trigger melanoma? And can sunscreen actually prevent melanoma? The studies by Viros et al. provide experimental evidence for acceleration of BRAF(V600E)-driven melanoma by UVR-induced TP53/Trp53 mutation and demonstrate that sunscreen delayed but did not completely block UVR-driven melanoma. The current study clearly shows that UVR boosts melanoma and sunscreens may provide partial UVR protection against melanoma — evidence which matches human epidemiologic data. Nevertheless, to protect the public from melanoma, Viros et al. advise that sunscreen should be utilized in combination with additional sun avoidance strategies. In addition, measures that may prevent UV-independent melanoma formation will require additional research and may also be needed in order to optimally battle the incidence of this life-threatening malignancy.     

Carotenoids and UV protection.

Photooxidative processes play a role in the pathobiochemistry of various disorders of light-exposed tissue. After irradiation of skin with UV light, erythema (sunburn) is an initial effect suitable for monitoring the direct biological response. Carotenoids are efficient in photoprotection, scavenging singlet oxygen and peroxyl radicals. Intervention studies with supplements or a carotenoid-rich diet documented efficiency in systemic photoprotection, measuring a decreased sensitivity against UV-induced erythema. For successful intervention, treatment with carotenoids is needed for a period of at least ten weeks. An increased consumption of carotenoids may contribute to life-long protection against UV-induced damage.     

UV clothing and skin cancer

Skin cancer incidence in Croatia is steadily increasing in spite of public and governmental permanently measurements. It is clear that will soon become a major public health problem. The primary cause of skin cancer is believed to be a long exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation. The future designers of UV protective materials should be able to block totally the ultraviolet radiation. The aim of this paper is to present results of measurements concerning UV protecting ability of garments and sun-screening textiles using transmission spectrophotometer Cary 50 Solarscreen (Varian) according to AS/NZS 4399:1996; to show that standard clothing materials are not always adequate to prevent effect of UV radiation to the human skin; and to suggest the possibilities for its improvement for this purpose.     

Enhanced UV Inactivation of Adenoviruses under Polychromatic UV Lamps

Adenovirus is recognized as the most UV-resistant waterborne pathogen of concern to public health microbiologists. The U.S. EPA has stipulated that a UV fluence (dose) of 186 mJ cm⁻² is required for 4-log inactivation credit in water treatment. However, all adenovirus inactivation data to date published in the peer-reviewed literature have been based on UV disinfection experiments using UV irradiation at 253.7 nm produced from a conventional low-pressure UV source. The work reported here presents inactivation data for adenovirus based on polychromatic UV sources and details the significant enhancement in inactivation achieved using these polychromatic sources. When full-spectrum, medium-pressure UV lamps were used, 4-log inactivation of adenovirus type 40 is achieved at a UV fluence of less than 60 mJ cm⁻² and a surface discharge pulsed UV source required a UV fluence of less than 40 mJ cm⁻². The action spectrum for adenovirus type 2 was also developed and partially explains the improved inactivation based on enhancements at wavelengths below 230 nm. Implications for water treatment, public health, and the future of UV regulations for virus disinfection are discussed.     

Opposing effects of the UV lesion repair protein XPA and UV bypass polymerase eta on ATR checkpoint signaling

An essential component of the ATR (ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related)-activating structure is single-stranded DNA. It has been suggested that nucleotide excision repair (NER) can lead to activation of ATR by generating such a signal, and in yeast, DNA damage processing through the NER pathway is necessary for checkpoint activation during G1. We show here that ultraviolet (UV) radiation-induced ATR signaling is compromised in XPA-deficient human cells during S phase, as shown by defects in ATRIP (ATR-interacting protein) translocation to sites of UV damage, UV-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 and UV-induced replication protein A phosphorylation and chromatin binding. However, ATR signaling was not compromised in XPC-, CSB-, XPF- and XPG-deficient cells. These results indicate that damage processing is not necessary for ATR-mediated S-phase checkpoint activation and that the lesion recognition function of XPA may be sufficient. In contrast, XP-V cells deficient in the UV bypass polymerase eta exhibited enhanced ATR signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that lesion bypass and not lesion repair may raise the level of UV damage that can be tolerated before checkpoint activation, and that XPA plays a critical role in this activation.     

Ecological responses to UV radiation: interactions between the biological effects of UV on plants and on associated organisms

Solar ultraviolet (UV)-B radiation (280-315 nm) has a wide range of effects on terrestrial ecosystems, yet our understanding of how UV-B influences the complex interactions of plants with pest, pathogen and related microorganisms remains limited. Here, we report the results of a series of experiments in Lactuca sativa which aimed to characterize not only key plant responses to UV radiation in a field environment but also consequential effects for plant interactions with a sap-feeding insect, two model plant pathogens and phylloplane microorganism populations. Three spectrally modifying filters with contrasting UV transmissions were used to filter ambient sunlight, and when compared with our UV-inclusive filter, L. sativa plants grown in a zero UV-B environment showed significantly increased shoot fresh weight, reduced foliar pigment concentrations and suppressed population growth of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae). Plants grown under a filter which allowed partial transmission of UV-A radiation and negligible UV-B transmission showed increased density of leaf surface phylloplane microbes compared with the UV-inclusive treatment. Effects of UV treatment on the severity of two plant pathogens, Bremia lactucae and Botrytis cinerea, were complex as both the UV-inclusive and zero UV-B filters reduced the severity of pathogen persistence. These results are discussed with reference to known spectral responses of plants, insects and microorganisms, and contrasted with established fundamental responses of plants and other organisms to solar UV radiation, with particular emphasis on the need for future integration between different experimental approaches when investigating the effects of solar UV radiation.     

Shining light on lupus and UV

People exposed to sunlight can develop erythema, DNA damage, and photoimmunosupression. Extended exposure of normal epidermis to sunlight will induce dysmorphic keratinocytes with pyknotic nuclei scattered throughout the spinous layer. These 'sunburn cells' are apoptotic keratinocytes and are usually cleared within 48 hours after sunburn. Patients with lupus erythematosus, however, whether it be the discoid, subacute cutaneous, systemic, or tumid form, develop new cutaneous lesions and can experience systemic worsening of their disease. Are sunlight-induced keratinocyte apoptosis and the immune response to these cells abnormal in lupus patients?     

Phytochrome and UV signal transduction pathways

The phytochromes are the best studied plant photoreceptors, controlling a wide variety of responses at both whole plant and single cell levels. Three signal transduction pathways, dependent on cGMP and/or calcium, have been found to be utilized by phytochrome to control the expression of genes required for chloroplast development (e.g., CAB and FNR) and anthocyanin biosynthesis (e.g., CHS). In particular, cGMP is a second messenger positively regulating CHS gene expression whilst calcium and calmodulin act as negative regulators. In addition to phytochrome regulation of CHS we have begun to examine the signal transduction pathways utilized by UV photoreceptors. In contrast to phytochrome-mediated responses, results indicate a role for calcium and calmodulin as positive regulators of CHS gene expression in UV light.     

Shedding UV light on the phase problem

In this issue of Structure, Nanao and Ravelli (2006) describe the use of UV-induced radiation damage (UV-RIP) to solve the phase problem for proteins, employing single-wavelength X-ray radiation, without the need for derivatization. This should also permit data collection for many proteins on home sources, without travel to a synchrotron.     

Biological UV dosimetry using the DLR-biofilm.

Changes of environmental UV radiation as part of global atmospheric changes will influence the biosphere substantially. The determination of the biological effects of these changes requires accurate and reliable UV monitoring systems that weight the spectral irradiance according to the biological responses under consideration. Biological UV dosimeters, which directly weight the incident UV components of sunlight in relation to the effectiveness of the different wavelengths and the potential interactions between them, can complement weighted physical UV measurements. Up to now several UV-dependent endpoints in biomolecules (e.g. uracil, DNA, provitamin D3), bacteriophages (e.g. T7), bacteria (e.g.E. coli, B. subtilis) and cultured eukaryotic cells have been suggested as sensing elements in biological UV dosimeters. One example is the DLR-biofilm consisting of immobilised spores of the bacterium B. subtilis as a UV sensor. It weights per se the incident UV radiation according to its DNA-damaging effectiveness. In several examples the applicability of the DLR-biofilm technique for personal UV dosimetry as well as for the measurement of the biologically weighted irradiance of the sun and of artificial UV sources is demonstrated.     

UV Micrographs and Photomicrographs from the Palynological Laboratory,Stockholm-Solna

In Equisetum both the spore and the rhizoidal and first-formed prothallial cells contain sac-like cytoplasmic particles limited by a unit membrane. After KMnO₄ fixation these bodies resemble the spherosomes described from earlier studies (e.g. Frey-Wyssling et al., 1964). They are bounded by a unit membrane, have a diameter of 0.8–1.7 μ and a fine granular content. After double fixation with buffered glutaraldehyde combined with an osmium post-fixative, or triple fixation with buffered formaldehyde added, the bodies resemble microbodies in fine structure. They have a thin unit membrane, a more coarsely granular matrix than after KMnO₄ fixation and very often a core like a 0.5 μ cluster of tubules or discs of around 200 Å in diameter. When spores are fixed in glutaraldehyde the bodies often show cytoplasmic invaginations or inclusions, which is never the case when they are fixed with KMnO₄