Asynchronous appearance of newly synthesized histone H1 subfractions in HeLa chromatin

Incorporation of radioactive alanine into chromatin-bound subfractions of H1 histone was studied in HeLa cells synchronized by the double thymidine block technique. The subfractions were resolved into three chromatographic peaks by Biorex-70. In the period 5-7 h after release from the thymidine block, peaks I and III showed twice as much incorporation as they did in the period 1-3 h after release, whereas peak II showed three times the incorporation at 5-7 h that it did at 1- 3 h. Thus, the H1-histone subfraction in peak II appears in chromatin somewhat later in S phase than do the subfractions in Peaks I and III.     

Heterogeneity of chromatin subunits in vitro and location of histone H1.

Chromatin subunits ("nucleosomes") which were purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation of a staphylococcal nuclease digest of chromatin have been studied. We found that such a preparation contains nucleosomes of two discrete types which can be separated from each other by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleosome of the first type contains all five histones and a DNA segment of approximately 200 base pairs long, whereas nucleosome of the second type lacks histone H1 and its DNA segment is approximately 170 base pairs long, i.e., about 30 base pairs shorter than the DNA segment of the nucleosome of the first type. Purified dimer of the nucleosome also can be fractionated by gel electrophoresis into three discrete bands which correspond to dinucleosomes containing two molecules of histone H1, one and no H1. These and related findings strongly suggest that the H1 molecule is bound to a short (approximately 30 base pairs) terminal stretch of the nucleosomal DNA segment which can be removed by nuclease (possibly in the form of H1-DNA complex) without any significant disturbance of main structural features of the nucleosome.     

Asymmetry of chromatin subunits probed with histone H1 in an H1-DNA complex

Treatment of nucleosomes with a low concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate removed all proteins except histone H1 from DNA, thus confirming our previous observation on sheared chromatin. No redistribution of H1 occurred during this procedure for isolation of the H1-DNA complex. The H1-DNA complex was isolated from a nucleosome monomer, doubly labeled in its protein and DNA and fractionated according to the length of DNA, and then the distribution of H1 was analyzed quantitatively. The results indicated that the monomer consisted of two subspecies, one containing 160 base pairs of DNA and one molecule of H1, and the other containing 140 base pairs of DNA and no H1. Since no monomer with two molecules of H1 was found, it is concluded that the nucleosome core has a binding site for H1 on only one side, and thus that the nucleosome is not a dyad.     

Identification of nonhistone chromatin proteins in chromatin subunits (or mononucleosomes) devoid of histone H1.

Rat liver chromatin was digested by micrococcal nuclease. Chromatin subunits (or mononucleosomes) were isolated by sucrose density gradient and subsequently fractionated by 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis into two major components. One component (MN1) of the mononucleosomes had a higher mobility, contained histones H2A, H2B, H3, H4, and shorter DNA fragments (140 base pairs) while the other (MN2) contained all five histones and longer DNA fragments (180 base pairs). Both submononucleosomes (MN1 and MN2) were found to contain nonhistone chromatin proteins (NHCP). By electrophoresis in 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel, 9 and 11 major fractions of NHCP were identified in the submononucleosomes MN1 and MN2, respectively. It was also observed that treatment of mononucleosomes with 0.6 M NaCl removes most of these NHCP and histone H1 except for two major NHCP which remain in the core particles.     

Differential phosphorylation of histone H1 subfractions in vivo.

A study was made of the phosphorylation of chromatographically purified histone H1 subfractions from the liver of premetamorphic tadpoles ($\text{Rana}\text{catesbeiana}$). Two H1 subfractions were obtained which differed in terms of net incorporation of [³²P]phosphate $\text{in}\text{vivo}$. Analysis of N-bromosuccinimide cleavage products further revealed that the two subfractions also differed in the relative distribution of [³²P]phosphate in N- and C-terminal regions of the molecule. Incorporation of [³²P]phosphate into both regions of the molecule occurred virtually exclusively in serine residues.     

Conformational changes in subfractions of calf thymus histone H1.

This paper presents the first study of conformational changes in the subfractions of calf thymus H1. H1 was fractionated by the method of Kincade and Cole (Kincade, J. M., and Cole, R.D. (1966), J. Biol. Chem. 241. 5790) using a very shallow Gdn-HC1 gradient. A possible new H1 subfraction, about 5--8% of the H1, has been found and characterized by amino acid analysis and electrophoresis. The effects of salt concentration and pH on the conformation of each of the four major subfractions have been studied by measuring the fluorescence anisotropy of the tyrosine emission and the circular dichroism (CD) of the peptide bond. Upon the addition of salt to aqueous solutions at neutral pH, all four subfractions show an instantaneous change in fluorescence anisotropy, fluorescence intensity, tyrosine absorbance, and CD. The folding associated with this instantaneous change is highly cooperative, and involves the region of the molecule containing the lone tyrosine, which becomes buried in the folded form. The folding of subfraction 3a is more sensitive to salt than the other major subfractions. Upon folding, approximately 13% of the residues of subfractions 1b and 2 form alpha and beta structure; 3a and 3b have approximately 16% of the residues in alpha and beta structures. There is no evidence for interactions between the subfractions. In salt-free solutions, each of the four major subfractions show very little change in conformation in going from low to neutral pH, but each shows a very sharp transition near pH 9. This transition gives rise to a marked increase in fluorescence anisotropy and fluorescence intensity, and involves the formation of both alpha and beta strucute in a manner similar to that of the salt-induced state.     

The dynamics of histone H1 function in chromatin

Over 80% of the nucleosomes in chromatin contain histone H1, a protein family known to affect the structure and activity of chromatin. Genetic studies and in vivo imaging experiments are changing the traditional view of H1 function and mechanism of action. H1 variants are partially redundant, mobile molecules that interact with nucleosomes as members of a dynamic protein network and serve as fine tuners of chromatin function.     

Immunochemical detection of changes in chromatin subunits induced by histone H4 acetylation.

Native, reassociated, and reconstituted core particles from chicken erythrocytes were compared by both biophysical and immunochemical methods. No significant difference between the three types of core particles could be demonstrated by electron microscopy, circular dichroism, or immunochemical analysis with antisera to histone H2B, H2A, and H3. Core particles were also reconstituted with calf thymus non-acetylated H3, H2A, and H2B with either mono-, di-, or tri-acetylated H4 isolated from cuttle -fish testes. The hyperacetylation of H4 did not significantly alter the biophysical characteristics of core particles but it induced several changes in their immunochemical reactivity. Binding to core particles of antibodies specific for H2A, H3, and for the IRGERA (synthetic C-terminal) peptide of H3 was considerably decreased when di- or tri-acetylated H4 was used for reconstitution, whereas binding of H2B antibodies remained the same. Our results suggest that the presence of hyperacetylated H4 within core particles leads to conformational changes that alter the antigenic determinants of several of the histones present at the surface of chromatin subunits. Since histone acetylation is correlated with the open structure of active chromatin, it may become possible to monitor the activity of chromatin by immunochemical methods.     

The condensation of chromatin and histone H1-depleted chromatin by spermine

At low ionic strength, spermine induces aggregation of native and H1-depleted chromatin at spermine/phosphate (Sp/P) ratios of 0.15 and 0.3, respectively. Physico-chemical methods (electric dichroism, circular dichroism and thermal denaturation) show that spermine, at Sp/P less than 0.15, does not appreciably alter the conformation of native chromatin and interacts unspecifically with all parts of chromatin DNA (linker as well as regions slightly or tightly bound to histones). In chromatin, the role of spermine could be more important in the stabilization of higher-order structure than in the condensation of the 30 nm solenoid. The addition of spermine to H1-depleted chromatin revealed two important features: (i) spermine can partially mimic the role of histone H1 in the condensation of chromatin; (ii) the core histone octamer does not appear to play any role in the aggregation process by spermine as DNA and H1-depleted chromatin aggregate at the same Sp/P ratio.     

The involvement of histone H1[0] in chromatin structure.

Micrococcal nuclease digestion and light scattering are used to compare native chromatins with various histone H1[0] contents. The experimental data show that the higher the H1[0] content, the greater the ability to form compact structures with increasing ionic strength, and the lower the DNA accessibility to micrococcal nuclease. On the contrary, reconstituted samples from H1-depleted chromatin and pure individual H1 fractions behave in such a way that samples reconstituted with pure H1 degree give rise to a looser structure, more accessible to nuclease than samples reconstituted with H1-1. This contradiction suggests that the effect of H1o on chromatin structure must originate from the interaction of this histone with other components in native chromatin among which other histone H1 subfractions are good candidates.     

The ubiquitinated histone species are enriched in histone H1-depleted chromatin regions

Bovine thymus and trout testis chromatin were fractionated into regions which differed in their micrococcal nuclease accessibility and solubility properties, and the distribution of the ubiquitinated histone species among these chromatin regions was elucidated. Ubiquitinated (u) species of histones H2A and H2B were enriched in the nuclease-sensitive, low-ionic-strength, soluble fraction of both chromatins. These results indicate that the presence of ubiquitinated histones may alter nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and destabilize higher-order chromatin structures. Bovine thymus chromatin was separated into aggregation-resistant, salt-soluble and aggregation-prone, salt-insoluble chromatin fractions. The aggregation-resistant chromatin fraction depleted in H1 histones was enriched in uH2A and uH2B, with uH2B showing the greater enrichment. The chromatin fragments were also stripped and reconstituted with the H1 histones prior to fractionation. The results were the same as above: uH2A and uH2B were preferentially localized in the aggregation-resistant. H1-depleted chromatin fraction, suggesting that chromatin regions enriched in ubiquitinated histone species have a reduced affinity for the H1 histones. Thus, ubiquitinated histone species may be one of the contributing factors in the differential assembly of various parts of the genome.     

The structural role of histone H1: properties of reconstituted chromatin with various H1 subfractions (H1-1, H1-2, and H1o).

A previous study on the distribution of histone H1 subfractions in chromatin suggested that these proteins differ in the protection they confer to DNA. To elucidate further this suggestion, reconstitution experiments were carried out with purified H1 subfractions (H1-1, H1-2, H1o) and H1-depleted chromatin. We have studied the structural properties of H1o as compared to those of other H1 fractions by electrophoretic analysis of DNA and mononucleosomes obtained after micrococcal nuclease digestion, thermal denaturation, and electron microscopy. The three fractions studied reassociate to H1-depleted chromatin. However, differences in the extent of DNA protection are observed between H1o and the other fractions: H1o induces a more rapid degradation of long oligomers into mononucleosomes; these mononucleosomes bearing H1o only, have a greater electrophoretic mobility; furthermore, thermal denaturation shows that a small fraction of DNA is less efficiently protected by H1o than by the other fractions. Electron microscopy, on the other hand, shows that these differences are not due to areas of chromatin devoid of H1o in the reconstitute and that the reconstituted samples are able, under proper ionic conditions, to refold in a higher-order structure.     

Mutual arrangement of histone H1 molecules in extended chromatin. Chymotryptic digestion of cross-linked H1 histone dimers

Mutual arrangement of histone H1 molecules in chromatin extended in low salt-EDTA buffer and additionally in the presence of urea was studied by means of reversible cross-linking combined with chymotryptic digestion. In the chromatins tested, the chymotryptic halves of H1 were cross-linked in all possible combinations; i.e., C-C, C-N and N-N. The results imply that the mutual arrangement of H1 histones is determined by the structure of extended nucleosomal chain, rather than chromatin superstructure.     

Influence of linker histone H1 on chromatin remodeling.

Chromatin-remodeling complexes have been a central area of focus for research dealing with accessing cellular DNA sequestered in chromatin. Although the linker histone H1 plays a major role in promoting and maintaining higher-order chromatin structure, it has been noticeably absent from assays utilizing chromatin-remodeling enzymes. This review focuses on two ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes, Drosophila ISWI and mammalian SWI/SNF, that have been assayed using chromatin templates containing histone H1.     

On the binding of histone H1 in chromatin

Nucleosomal subunits isolated from rabbit thymus nuclei in 0.04 M K₂SO₄-0.02 M Tris, pH 7.4 were devoid of histone H1, while whole chromatin prepared in the same buffer contained the full complement of histone H1. The question is asked why histone H1 dissociates from the subunits but not from the high molecular weight material. We propose that, at physiological salt concentrations, histone H1 is not bound to linker DNA as depicted in the current models; rather, alternate attachment sites, present only in the polymer, are involved.     

The distribution of H1 histone is nonuniform in chromatin and correlates with different degrees of condensation

Salt induces aggregation of large chromatin fragments maximally at 150-200 mM NaCl. The soluble fragments are depleted of H1 histones while the aggregated fragments are enriched. H1 histones did not equilibrate between the soluble and insoluble chromatin fractions when they were recycled through the process of salt-induced aggregation. The chromatin fragments that resisted aggregation retained more H1c subtype than they did H1 ab, correlating with previous results which showed complexes of H1c with DNA resisted salt-induced aggregation much more than complexes of DNA with other subtypes. The chromatin that was soluble at physiological concentrations of NaCl was DNase I sensitive and enriched in acetylated core histones. We conclude that H1 histone is nonuniformly distributed in chromatin in a stable pattern that probably correlates with the different degrees of condensation known to exist in vivo.