Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in small Photosystem II particles

Photosystem II reaction center components have been studied in small system II particles prepared with digitonin. Upon illumination the reduction of the primary acceptor was indicated by absorbance changes due to the reduction of a plastoquinone to the semiquinone anion and by a small blue shift of absorption bands near 545 nm (C550) and 685 nm. The semiquinone to chlorophyll ratio was between 1/20 and 1/70 in various preparations. The terminal electron donor in this reaction did not cause large absorbance changes but its oxidized form was revealed by a hitherto unknown electron spin resonance (ESR) signal, which had some properties of the well-known signal II but a linewidth and g-value much nearer to those of signal I. Upon darkening absorbance and ESR changes decayed together in a cyclic or back reaction which was stimulated by 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The donor could be oxidized by ferricyanide in the dark.

Illumination in the presence of ferricyanide induced absorbance and ESR changes, rapidly reversed upon darkening, which may be ascribed to the oxidation of a chlorophyll a dimer, possibly the primary electron donor of photosystem II. In addition an ESR signal with 15 to 20 gauss linewidth and a slower dark decay was observed, which may have been caused by a secondary donor.     

Identification of the reduced primary electron acceptor of Photosystem II as a bound semiquinone anion

The complete absorption difference spectrum of the primary electron acceptor of Photosystem II has been measured at room temperature in subchloroplast fragments prepared with deoxycholate. The shape and amplitude of the spectrum indicate that the primary reaction involves the reduction of one bound plastoquinone molecule per reaction center to its semiquinone anion. In addition two small absorbance band shifts occur near 545 (C550) and 685 nm, which may be due to an influence of the semiquinone on the absorption spectrum of a reaction center pigment.     

Light-induced changes of fluorescence and absorbance in spinach chloroplasts at −40 °C

1. 1. Spinach chloroplasts were stored in the dark for at least 1 h, rapidly cooled to −40 °C, and illuminated with continuous light or short saturating flashes. In agreement with the measurements of Joliot and Joliot, chloroplasts that had been preilluminated with one or two flashes just before cooling showed a less efficient increase in the yield of chlorophyll a fluorescence upon illumination at −40 °C than dark-adapted chloroplasts. The effect disappeared below −150 °C, but reappeared again upon warming to −40 °C. Little effect was seen at room temperature in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), added after the preillumination.

2. 2. Light-induced absorbance difference spectra at −40 °C in the region 500–560 nm indicated the participation of two components, the socalled 518-nm change (P518) and C-550. After preillumination with two flashes the absorbance change at 518 nm was smaller, and almost no C-550 was observed. After four flashes, the bands of C-550 were clearly visible again.

3. 3. The fluorescence increase and the absorbance change at 518 nm showed the same type of flash pattern with a minimum after the second and a maximum at the fourth flash. In the presence of 100 μM hydroxylamine, the fluorescence response was low after the fourth and high again after the sixth flash, which confirmed the hypothesis that the flash effect was related to the so-called S-state of the electron transport pathway from water to Photosystem 2.

4. 4. The kinetics of the light-induced absorbance changes were the same at each wavelength, and, apart from the size of the deflection, they were independent of preillumination. Flash experiments indicated that the absorbance changes were a one-quantum reaction. This was also true for the fluorescence increase in dark-adapted chloroplasts, but with preilluminated chloroplasts several flashes were needed to approximately saturate the fluorescence yield.

5. 5. The results are discussed in terms of a mechanism involving two electron donors and two electron acceptors for System 2 of photosynthesis.

Charge accumulation at the reducing side of system 2 of photosynthesis

A study was made of the reactions between the primary and secondary electron acceptors of Photosystem 2 by measurements of the increase of chlorophyll fluorescence induced in darkness by dithionite or by 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU). The experiments were done either with chloroplasts to which hydroxylamine or carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) was added, or with chloroplasts treated with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) to which phenylenediamine and ascorbate were added as donor system. Under these conditions the fluorescence increase induced by dithionite or DCMU added after illumination with short light flashes was dependent on the flash number with a periodicity of two; it was large after an uneven number of flashes, and small after a long darktime or after an even number of flashes. The results are interpreted in terms of a model which involves a hypothetical electron carrier situated between Q and plastoquinone; this electron carrier is thought to equilibrate with plastoquinone in a two-electron transfer reaction; the results obtained with DCMU are explained by assuming that its midpoint potential is lowered by this inhibitor.     

Electron paramagnetic resonance Signal II in spinach chloroplasts. I. Kinetic analysis for untreated chloroplasts

An analysis of electron paramagnetic resonance Signal II in spinach chloroplasts has been made using both continuous and flashing light techniques. In order to perform the experiments we developed a method which allows us to obtain fresh, untreated chloroplasts with low dark levels of Signal II. Under these conditions a single 10-μs flash is sufficient to generate greater than 80% of the possible light-induced increase in Signal II spin concentration. The risetime for this flash-induced increase in Signal II is approx. 1 s. The close association of Signal II with Photo-system II is confirmed by the observations that red light is more effective than is far red light in generating Signal II, and that 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) does not inhibit the formation of the radical. Single flash saturation curves for the flash-induced increase in Signal I and Signal II indicate that the quantum efficiency for Signal II formation is close to that for Signal I. While one or two flashes (spaced 10 ms apart) are quite efficient in generating Signal II, three or four flashes are much less effective. However, if this spacing is decreased to 100 μs, three or four flashes become as efficient as one or two flashes. From observations of a deficiency of O₂ evolved during the initial flashes of dark-adapted chloroplasts, we conclude that the species which gives rise to Signal II is able to compete with water for oxidizing equivalents generated by Photosystem II. On the basis of these results we postulate a model in which Signal II arises from an oxidized radical which is produced by a slow electron transfer to the specific states S₂ and S₃ on the water side of Photo-system II.     

Photoreductant-induced oxidation of Fe2+ in the electron-acceptor complex of Photosystem II

The ferrous ion associated with the electron acceptors in Photosystem II can be oxidized by the unstable semiquinone form of certain high-potential quinones (phenyl-p-benzoquinone, dimethylbenzoquinone and benzoquinone) which are used as electron acceptors. In a flash sequence, alternating oxidation of the iron by the photoreduced semiquinone on odd-numbered flashes is followed by photoreduction of the iron on even-numbered flashes. These reactions are detected by monitoring EPR signals arising from Fe³⁺. The oxidation of the iron can also occur in the frozen state (−30°C) indicating that the high-potential quinone can occupy the Q_B site. The reaction also takes place when the exogenous quinone is added in the dark to samples in which Q_B is already in the semiquinone form. The inhibitors of electron transfer between Q_A⁻ and Q_B, DCMU and sodium formate, block the photoreductant-induced iron oxidation. It is suggested that the iron oxidation takes place through the Q_B site. This unexpected photochemistry occurs under experimental conditions routinely used in studies of Photosystem II. Some previously reported phenomena can be reinterpreted on the basis of these new data.     

Absorbance difference spectra of the successive redox states of the oxygen-evolving apparatus of photosynthesis

The spectra of the absorbance changes due to the turnover of the so-called S-states of the oxygen-evolving apparatus were determined. The changes were induced by a series of saturating flashes in dark-adapted Photosystem II preparations, isolated from spinach chloroplasts. The electron acceptor was 2,5-dichloro-p-benzoquinone. The fraction of System II centers involved in each S-state transition on each flash was calculated from the oscillation pattern of the 1 ms absorbance transient which accompanies oxygen release. The difference spectrum associated with each S-state transition was then calculated from the observed flash-induced difference spectra. The spectra were found to contain a contribution by electron transfer at the acceptor side, which oscillated during the flash series approximately with a periodicity of two and was apparently modulated to some extent by the redox state of the donor side. At the donor side, the S₀ → S₁, S₁ → S₂ and S₂ → S₃ transitions were all three accompanied by the same absorbance difference spectrum, attributed previously to an oxidation of Mn(III) to Mn(IV) (Dekker, J.P., Van Gorkom, H.J., Brok, M. and Ouwehand, L. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 764, 301–309). It is concluded that each of these S-state transitions involves the oxidation of an Mn(III) to Mn(IV). The spectrum and amplitude of the millisecond transient were in agreement with its assignment to the reduction of the oxidized secondary donor Z⁺ and the three Mn(IV) ions.     

Effect of dibromothymoquinone (DBMIB) on reduction rates of Photosystem I donors in intact chloroplasts

Dual effect of dibromothymoquinone ( DBMIB ), inhibitor and reducing agent at the donor side of Photosystem I, was investigated in isolated intact chloroplasts by flash-induced absorbance changes at 820 and 515 nm. We show that in the absence of other electron donors, rereduction of P700+ by DBMIB proceeds at a very low rate (half-time of approximately 10 s) Dual effect of DBMIB explains that the initial rise of electrochromic absorbance change induced by repetitive flashes is usually not diminished while the slow rise is fully inhibited by this compound.     

Ubiquinone reduction and proton uptake by chromatophores of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26: periodicity of two in consecutive light flashes.

Chromatophores of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides strain R-26 were subjected to a series of brief flashes of light in the presence of diaminodurene as an electron donor. Odd-numbered flashes induced the reduction of ubiquinone to the anionic semiquinone, as indicated by absorbance changes near 450 nm. This reaction was not attended by proton binding. Even-numbered flashes caused disappearance of the semiquinone, presumably by conversion to the fully reduced form. This reaction was attended by proton uptake.     

Ubiquinone reduction and proton uptake by chromatophores of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26. Periodicity of two in consecutive light flashes

Chromatophores of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides strain R-26 were subjected to a series of brief flashes of light in the presence of diaminodurene as an electron donor. Odd-numbered flashes induced the reduction of ubiquinone to the anionic semiquinone, as indicated by absorbance changes near 450 nm. This reaction was not attended by proton binding. Even-numbered flashes caused disappearance of the semiquinone, presumably by conversion to the fully reduced form. This reaction was attended by proton uptake.     

Flash-induced 515 nm absorbance change in chloroplasts with various granum contents

The 515 nm absorbance change was studied in mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts of maize, which contain different amounts of grana. The amplitude of the 515 nm signal (induced by 3 μs flashes repeated at 4 s intervals) has shown a correlation with the granum content of the samples. However, upon addition of N-methylphenazonium methosulphate the 515 nm signal became independent of the amount of grana: in agranal thylakoids a large pool of silent Photosystem I was activated and, as a result, the amplitude of the 515 nm signal of agranal chloroplasts increased to the level exhibited by granal chloroplasts.These data show that the 515 nm absorbance change is not limited to small closed vesicles like grana, but in the presence of suitable electron donors single lamellae of bundle sheath chloroplasts can also be active.     

Energy transfer in the photochemical apparatus of flashed bean leaves

Fluorescence and energy transfer properties of bean leaves greened by brief, repetitive xenon flashes were studied at −196 °C. The bleaching of P-700 has no influence on the yield of fluorescence at any wavelength of emission. The light-induced fluorescence yield changes which are observed in both the 690 and 730 nm emission bands in the low temperature fluorescence spectra are due to changes in the state of the Photosystem II reaction centers. The fluorescence yield changes in the 730 nm band are attributed to energy transfer from Photosystem II to Photosystem I. Such energy transfer was also confirmed by measurements of the rate of photooxidation of P-700 at −196 °C in leaves in which the Photosystem II reaction centers were either all open or all closed. It is concluded that energy transfer from Photosystem II to Photosystem I occurs in the flashed bean leaves which lack the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein.     

Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in small photosystem II particles.

Photosystem II reaction center components have been studied in small system II particles prepared with digitonin. Upon illumination the reduction of the primary acceptor was indicated by absorbance changes due to the reduction of a plastoquinone to the semiquinone anion and by a small blue shifts of absorption bands near 545 nm (C550) and 685 nm. The semiquinone to chlorophyll ratio was between 1/20 and 1/70 in various preparations. The terminal electron donor in this reaction did not cause large absorbance changes but its oxidized form was revealed by a hitherto unknown electron spin resonance (ESR) signal, which had some properties of the well-known signal II but a linewidth and g-value much nearer to those of signal I. Upon darkening absorbance and ESR changes decayed together in a cyclic or back reaction which was stimulated by 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. The donor could be oxidized by ferricyanide in the dark. Illumination in the presence of ferricyanide induced absorbance and ESR changes, rapidly reversed upon darkening, which may be ascribed to the oxidation of a chlorophyll a dimer, possibly the primary electron donor of photosystem II. In addition an ESR signal with 15 to 20 gauss linewidth and a slower dark decay was observed, which may have been caused by a secondary donor.     

The effect of temperature on the primary reaction of chloroplast Photosystem II Evidence for a temperature-dependent back reaction

The primary reaction of Photosystem II has been studied over the temperature range from −196 to −20 °C. The photooxidation of the reaction-center chlorophyll (P680) was followed by the free-radical electron paramagnetic resonance signal of P680⁺, and the photoreduction of the Photosystem II primary electron acceptor was monitored by the C-550 absorbance change.

At temperatures below −100 °C, the primary reaction of Photosystem II is irreversible. However, at temperatures between −100 and −20 °C a back reaction that is insensitive to 3-(3′,4′-dichlorophenyl)-1,1′-dimethylurea (DCMU) occurs between P680⁺ and the reduced acceptor.

The amount of reduced acceptor and P680⁺ present under steady-state illumination at temperatures between −100 and −20 °C is small unless high light intensity is used to overcome the competing back reaction. The amount of reduced acceptor present at low light intensity can be increased by adjusting the oxidation-reduction potential so that P680⁺ is reduced by a secondary electron donor (cytochrome b₅₅₉) before P680⁺ can reoxidize the reduced primary acceptor. The photooxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ and the accompanying photoreduction of C-550 are inhibited by DCMU. The inhibition of C-550 photoreduction by DCMU, the dependence of P680 photooxidation and C-550 photoreduction on light intensity, and the effect of the availability of reduced cytochrome b₅₅₉ on C-550 photoreduction are unique to the temperature range where the Photosystem II primary reaction is reversible and are not observed at lower temperatures.     

The 520 nm absorbance changes in Scenedesmus obliquus and its relation to Photosystem I

The kinetics (region of seconds) of the light-induced 520 nm absorbance change and its dark reversal have been studied in detail in the wild type and in some pigment and photosynthetic mutants of Scenedesmus obliquus. The following 5 lines of evidence led us to conclude that the signal is entirely due to the photosystem I reaction modified by electron flow from Photosystem II.Gradual blocking of the electron transport with 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea resulted in diminution and ultimate elimination of the biphasic nature of the signal without reducing the extent of the absorbance change or of the dark kinetics. On the contrary, blocking electron flow at the oxidizing side of plastoquinone with 2, $\text{5-}\text{dibromo}\text{-3-}\text{methyl}\text{-6-}\text{isoprophyl}\text{-p-}\text{benzoquinone}$ or inactivating the plastocyanin with KCN, prolonged the dark reversal of the absorbance change apart from abolishing the biphasic nature of the signal.Action spectra clearly indicate that the main signal (I) is due to electron flow in Photosystem I and that its modification (Signal II) is due to the action of Photosystem II.Signal I is pH independent, whereas Signal II demonstrates a strong pH dependence, parallel to the O₂-evolving capacity of the cells.Chloroplast particles isolated from the wild type Scenedesmus cells demonstrated in the absence of any added artificial electron donor or acceptor and also under non-phosphorylation conditions the 520 nm absorbance change with approximately the same magnitude as whole cells. The dark kinetics of the particles were comparatively slower. Removal of plastocyanin and other electron carriers by washing with Triton X-100 slowed down the kinetics of the dark reversal reaction to a greater extent. A similar positive absorbance change at 520 nm and slow dark reversal was also observed in the Photosystem I particles prepared by the Triton method.Mutant C-6E, which contains neither carotenoids nor chlorophyll $\text{b}$ and lacks Photosystem II activity, demonstrates a normal signal I of the 520 nm absorbance change. This latter result contradicts the postulate that carotenoids are the possible cause of the 520 nm absorbance change.     

Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of Photosystem II in Chlorella Pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll a fluorescence

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield Ф of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 μs to several minutes after short ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 30}\text{ns}$ or 5 μs) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield “in the dark” increased from $\text{Ф = 1}$ at the beginning to $\text{Ф ≈ 5}$ in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given.After one saturating flash, Ф increased to a maximum value (4–5) at 50 μs, then Ф decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not follewed by a slow increase.These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250–256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz, J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85–94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A^2?). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A^2? via System I: Q^?R^2? + A → Q^?R + A^2? → QR^? + A^2?. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D₁, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R^? and A in the state A^2?. An endogenous electron donor, D₂, and Q^? compete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

Primary reactions of Photosystem II at low pH. 2. Light-induced changes of absorbance and electron spin resonance in spinach chloroplasts

The effects of lowering the pH on Photosystem II have been studied by measuring changes in absorbance and electron spin resonance in spinach chloroplasts.At pH values around 4 a light-induced dark-reversible chlorophyll oxidation by Photosystem II was observed. This chlorophyll is presumably the primary electron donor of system II. At pH values between 5 and 4 steady state illumination induced an ESR signal, similar in shape and amplitude to signal II, which was rapidly reversed in the dark. This may reflect the accumulation of the oxidized secondary donor upon inhibition of oxygen evolution. Near pH 4 the rapidly reversible signal and the stable and slowly decaying components of signal II disappeared irreversibly concomitant with the release of bound manganese.The results are discussed in relation to the effects of low pH on prompt and delayed fluorescence reported earlier (van Gorkom, H. J., Pulles, M. P. J., Haveman, J. and den Haan, G. A. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 423, 217–226).     

Identification of S2 as the sensitive state to alkaline photoinactivation of Photosystem II in chloroplasts

1. Chloroplasts have been preilluminated by a sequence of n short saturating flashes immediately before alkalinization to pH 9.3, and brought back 2 min later to pH 7.8. The assay of Photosystem II activity through dichlorophenolindophenol photoreduction, oxygen evolution, fluorescence induction, shows that part of the centers is inactivated and that this part depends on the number of preilluminating flashes (maximum inhibition after one flash) in a way which suggests identification of state S₂ as the target for alkaline inactivation.2. As shown by Reimer and Trebst ((1975) Biochem. Physiol. Pflanz. 168, 225–232) the inactivation necessitates the presence of gramicidin, which shows that the sensitive site is on the internal side of the thylakoid membrane.3. The electron flow through inactivated Photosystem II is restored by artificial donor addition (diphenylcarbazide or hydroxylamine); this suggests that the water-splitting enzyme itself is blocked. The inactivation is accompanied by a solubilization of bound Mn²⁺ and by the occurrence of EPR Signal II “fast”.4. Glutaraldehyde fixation before the treatment does not prevent the inactivation which thus does not seem to involve a protein structural change.     

The mechanism of reduction of the ubiquinone pool in photosynthetic bacteria at different redox potentials.

(1) A flash number dependency of flash-induced absorbance changes was observed with whole cells of Rhodospirillum rubrum and chromatophores of R. rubrum and Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides wild type and the G1C mutant. The oscillatory behavior was dependent on the redox potential; it was observed under oxidizing conditions only. Absorbance difference spectra measured after each flash in the 275--500 nm wavelength region showed that a molecule of ubiquinone, R, is reduced to the semiquinone (R-) after odd-numbered flashes and reoxidized after even-numbered flashes. The amount of R reduced was approximately one molecule per reaction center. (2) The flash number dependency of the electrochromic shift of the carotenoid spectrum was studied with chromatophores of Rps. sphaeroides wild type and the G1C mutant. At higher values of the ambient redox potential a relatively slow phase with a rise time of 30 ms was observed after even-numbered flashes, in addition to the fast phase (completed within 0.2 ms) occurring after each flash. Evidence was obtained that the slow phase represents the formation of an additional membrane potential during a dark reaction that occurs after flashes with an even number. This reaction is inhibited by antimycin A, whereas the oscillations of the R/R- absorbance changes remain unaffected. At low potentials (E = 100 mV) no oscillations of the carotenoid shift were observed: a fast phase was followed by a slow phase (antimycin-sensitive) with a half-time of 3 ms after each flash. (3) The results are discussed in terms of a model for the cyclic electron flow as described by Prince and Dutton (Prince, R.C. and Dutton, P.L. (1976) Bacterial Photosynthesis Conference, Brussels, Belgium, September 6--9, Abstr. TB4) employing the so-called Q-cycle.     

Detection of oxygen-evolving Photosystem II centers inactive in plastoquinone reduction

Quite different estimates of the number of Photosystem II centers present in thylakoid membranes are obtained depending on the technique used in making the determination. By using brief saturating light flashes and measuring the electron transport per flash, we have obtained two values for the number of functional centers. When the electrons produced reduce the intersystem plastoquinone pool, there are about 1.7 mmol of active Photosystem II centers per mol chlorophyll, whereas there are at least 3 mmol of active centers per mol chlorophyll when certain halogenated benzoquinones are being reduced. There are also at least 3 mmol of terbutryn binding sites per mol of chlorophyll when this tightly binding herbicide is employed as a specific inhibitor of Photosystem II. Thus only about 60% of the membrane's total complement of Photosystem II centers are able to transfer electrons to Photosystem I at appreciable rates. Many functional assays requiring significant rates of turnover sample only this more active pool, whereas herbicide-binding studies and measurements of changes in the Photosystem II electron donor Z and electron acceptor Q_A performed by other investigators reveal, in addition, a large population of Photosystem II reaction centers that normally have negligible turnover numbers. However, these normally inactive centers readily transfer electrons to the halogenated benzoquinones and are then counted among the active centers. Therefore, it can be concluded that all of herbicide-binding sites represent centers with operative water-oxidizing reactions. It can also be concluded that there are few, if any, centers capable of binding more than a single herbicide molecule.