The entry into host cells of Sindbis virus, vesicular stomatitis virus and Sendai virus.

We have compared the mechanisms of entry into host cells of three enveloped viruses: Sendai virus, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and Sindbis virus. Virus entry by membrane fusion should antigenically modify the surface of a newly infected cell in such a way that it will be killed by anti-viral antibody and complement. On the other hand, virus entry by a mechanism involving uptake by the cell of the whole virion should not make cells sensitive to antibody and complement. As expected, cells newly infected with Sendai virus were readily and completely lysed by anti-Sendai antibody and complement. In marked contrast, however, cells newly infected with either Sindbis virus or VSV were killed by anti-viral antibody and complement only when infected at an extremely high multiplicity of infection, in excess of 1000 plaque-forming units per cell. We favor the following explanation for these results with Sindbis virus and VSV: a very large majority of the Sindbis and VSV virions entered the infected cells by some means other than membrane fusion, presumably engulfment of the whole particle. Efficient entry by way of membrane fusion may therefore not be a general characteristic of enveloped viruses.     

The UL20 gene product of pseudorabies virus functions in virus egress.

The UL20 open reading frame is positionally conserved in different alphaherpesvirus genomes and is predicted to encode an integral membrane protein. A previously described UL20- mutant of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) exhibited a defect in egress correlating with retention of virions in the perinuclear space (J. D. Baines, P. L. Ward, G. Campadelli-Fiume, and B. Roizman, J. Virol. 65:6414-6424, 1991). To analyze UL20 function in a related but different herpesvirus, we constructed a UL20- pseudorabies virus (PrV) mutant by insertional mutagenesis. Similar to HSV-1, UL20- PrV was found to be severely impaired in both cell-to-cell spread and release from cultured cells. The severity of this defect appeared to be cell type dependent, being more prominent in Vero than in human 143TK- cells. Surprisingly, electron microscopy revealed the retention of enveloped virus particles in cytoplasmic vesicles of Vero cells infected with UL20- PrV. This contrasts with the situation in the UL20- HSV-1 mutant, which accumulated virions in the perinuclear cisterna of Vero cells. Therefore, the UL20 gene products of PrV and HSV-1 appear to be involved in distinct steps of viral egress, acting in different intracellular compartments. This might be caused either by different functions of the UL20 proteins themselves or by generally different egress pathways of PrV and HSV-1 mediated by other viral gene products.     

The persistence of bovine viral diarrhea virus.

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) has a unique capacity to cause persistent infections of foetuses exposed within the first 150 days of gestation. Preventing foetal BVDV infection will aid in improved control. This unique ability gives BVDV a selective advantage allowing continual mutation and antigenic variation within cattle populations. Therefore, BVDV has become widespread and causes economic losses due to respiratory, reproductive and enteric disease. Vaccination (modified-live or killed) can provide some protection from acute disease and the development of persistently infected foetuses. However, vaccination programmes alone cannot control or eliminate BVDV. In naturally exposed and vaccinated herds, BVDV infections are not self-limiting and may persistent over time. This underscores the ability of the BVDV genome to remain fluid and adapt under selective pressures. Factors influencing persistence of BVDV infections in cattle populations include: non-lytic infections; evasion of host immune responses; foetal infections; acute infections; management practices; contaminated biologics; secondary hosts; defective replicated intermediates; antigenic variation; and replication in privileged anatomical sites.