Protection by natural IgG: a sweet partnership with soluble lectins does the trick!

EMBO J 32: 2905–2919 10.1038/emboj.2013.199; published online September032013Some B cells of the adaptive immune system secrete polyreactive immunoglobulin G (IgG) in the absence of immunization or infection. Owing to its limited affinity and specificity, this natural IgG is thought to play a modest protective role. In this issue, a report reveals that natural IgG binds to microbes following their opsonization by ficolin and mannan-binding lectin (MBL), two carbohydrate receptors of the innate immune system. The interaction of natural IgG with ficolins and MBL protects against pathogenic bacteria via a complement-independent mechanism that involves IgG receptor FcγRI expressing macrophages. Thus, natural IgG enhances immunity by adopting a defensive strategy that crossovers the conventional boundaries between innate and adaptive microbial recognition systems.The adaptive immune system generates protective somatically recombined antibodies through a T cell-dependent (TD) pathway that involves follicular B cells. After recognizing antigen through the B-cell receptor (BCR), follicular B cells establish a cognate interaction with CD4⁺ T follicular helper (T_FH) cells and thereafter either rapidly differentiate into short-lived IgM-secreting plasmablasts or enter the germinal centre (GC) of lymphoid follicles to complete class switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation (SHM) (Victora and Nussenzweig, 2012). CSR from IgM to IgG, IgA and IgE generates antibodies with novel effector functions, whereas SHM provides the structural correlate for the induction of affinity maturation (Victora and Nussenzweig, 2012). Eventually, this canonical TD pathway generates long-lived bone marrow plasma cells and circulating memory B cells that produce protective class-switched antibodies capable to recognize specific antigens with high affinity (Victora and Nussenzweig, 2012).In addition to post-immune monoreactive antibodies, B cells produce pre-immune polyreactive antibodies in the absence of conventional antigenic stimulation (Ehrenstein and Notley, 2010). These natural antibodies form a vast and stable repertoire that recognizes both non-protein and protein antigens with low affinity (Ehrenstein and Notley, 2010). Natural antibodies usually emerge from a T cell-independent (TI) pathway that involves innate-like B-1 and marginal zone (MZ) B cells. These are extrafollicular B-cell subsets that rapidly differentiate into short-lived antibody-secreting plasmablasts after detecting highly conserved microbial and autologus antigens through polyreactive BCRs and nonspecific germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (Pone et al, 2012; Cerutti et al, 2013).The most studied natural antibody is IgM, a pentameric complement-activating molecule with high avidity but low affinity for antigen (Ehrenstein and Notley, 2010). In addition to promoting the initial clearance of intruding microbes, natural IgM regulates tissue homeostasis, immunological tolerance and tumour surveillance (Ochsenbein et al, 1999; Zhou et al, 2007; Ehrenstein and Notley, 2010). Besides secreting IgM, B-1 and MZ B cells produce IgG and IgA after receiving CSR-inducing signals from dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages and neutrophils of the innate immune system (Cohen and Norins, 1966; Cerutti et al, 2013). In humans, certain natural IgG and IgA are moderately mutated and show some specificity, which may reflect the ability of human MZ B cells to undergo SHM (Cerutti et al, 2013). Yet, natural IgG and IgA are generally perceived as functionally quiescent.In this issue, Panda et al show that natural IgG bound to a broad spectrum of bacteria with high affinity by cooperating with ficolin and MBL (Panda et al, 2013), two ancestral soluble lectins of the innate immune system (Holmskov et al, 2003). This binding involved some degree of specificity, because it required the presence of ficolin or MBL on the microbial surface as well as lower pH and decreased calcium concentration in the extracellular environment as a result of infection or inflammation (see Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ficolins and MBL are produced by hepatocytes and various cells of the innate immune system and opsonize bacteria after recognizing conserved carbohydrates. Low pH and calcium concentrations present under infection-inflammation conditions promote the interaction of ficolin or MBL with natural IgG on the surface of bacteria. The resulting immunocomplex is efficiently phagocytosed by macrophages through FcγR1 independently of the complement protein C3, leading to the clearance of bacteria.Ficolins and MBL are soluble pattern recognition receptors that opsonize microbes after binding to glycoconjugates through distinct carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) structures (Holmskov et al, 2003). While ficolins use a fibrinogen domain, MBL and other members of the collectin family use a C-type lectin domain attached to a collagen-like region (Holmskov et al, 2003). Similar to pentraxins, ficolins and MBL are released by innate effector cells and hepatocytes, and thus may have served as ancestral antibody-like molecules prior to the inception of the adaptive immune system (Holmskov et al, 2003; Bottazzi et al, 2010). Of note, MBL and the MBL-like complement protein C1q are recruited by natural IgM to mediate complement-dependent clearance of autologous apoptotic cells and microbes (Holmskov et al, 2003; Ehrenstein and Notley, 2010). Panda et al found that a similar lectin-dependent co-optation strategy enhances the protective properties of natural IgG (Panda et al, 2013).By using bacteria and the bacterial glycan N-acetylglicosamine, Panda et al show that natural IgG isolated from human serum or T cell-deficient mice interacted with the fibrinogen domain of microbe-associated ficolins (Panda et al, 2013). The resulting immunocomplex was phagocytosed by macrophages via the IgG receptor FcγRI in a complement-independent manner (Panda et al, 2013). The additional involvement of MBL was demonstrated by experiments showing that natural IgG retained some bacteria-binding activity in the absence of ficolins (Panda et al, 2013).Surface plasmon resonance provided some clues regarding the molecular requirements of the ficolin–IgG interaction (Panda et al, 2013), but the conformational changes required by ficolin to interact with natural IgG remain to be addressed. In particular, it is unclear what segment of the effector Fc domain of natural IgG binds to ficolins and whether Fc-associated glycans are involved in this binding. Specific glycans have been recently shown to mitigate the inflammatory properties of IgG emerging from TI responses (Hess et al, 2013) and this process could implicate ficolins and MBL. Moreover, it would be important to elucidate whether and how the antigen-binding Fab portion of natural IgG regulates its interaction with ficolins and MBL.The in vivo protective role of natural IgG was elegantly demonstrated by showing that reconstitution of IgG-deficient mice lacking the CSR-enzyme activation-induced cytidine deaminase with natural IgG from T cell-insufficient animals enhanced resistance to pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Panda et al, 2013). This protective effect was associated with reduced production of proinflammatory cytokines, occurred independently of the complement protein C3 and was impaired by peptides capable to inhibit the binding of natural IgG to ficolin (Panda et al, 2013). Additional in vivo studies will be needed to determine whether natural IgG exerts protective activity in mice lacking ficolin, MBL or FcγRI, and to ascertain whether these molecules also enhance the protective properties of canonical or natural IgG and IgA released by bone marrow plasma cells and mucosal plasma cells, respectively.In conclusion, the findings by Panda et al show that natural IgG adopts ‘crossover'' defensive strategies that blur the conventional boundaries between the innate and adaptive immune systems. The sophisticated integration of somatically recombined and germline-encoded antigen recognition systems described in this new study shall stimulate immunologists to further explore the often underestimated protective virtues of our vast natural antibody repertoire. This effort may lead to the development of novel therapies against infections.     

Split decisions: oesophageal progenitor cell behaviour

Science advance online publication July192012; doi:10.1126/science.1218835The maintenance and regeneration of continually shedding epithelial tissues that make up the linings and barriers of our bodies requires rapid and continual input of proliferative progenitor cells for tissue homeostasis. The mechanisms by which epithelial progenitors cells maintain tissues remain controversial. In a recent Science paper, Doupé et al (2012) demonstrate that a population of equivalent progenitor cells support tissue homeostasis of the oesophagus without the need for slow cycling cells as described in other rapidly dividing epithelia.In tissues such as blood and skin in which differentiated cells constantly turnover, proliferative progenitor populations are required to continually produce lost differentiated cells. Several models have been proposed to explain mechanisms by which progenitor cells contribute to tissue maintenance (Figure 1). A hierarchical model has been suggested in which longer lived stem cells, which may also cycle slowly, produce highly proliferative cells with less self-renewal potential that differentiate into a restricted number of cells. Following proliferative cells in pulse-chase experiments and genetic lineage tracing has supported a hierarchical model in the blood, epidermis and intestine (Fuchs, 2009). Alternatively, an equivalency model has been proposed in which all proliferative progenitor cells are equally able to produce proliferative and differentiated progeny in a stochastic manner. Analysis of labelled clones has supported an equivalency model for progenitors in the interfollicular epidermis and intestine (Clayton et al, 2007; Doupé et al, 2010; Snippert et al, 2010).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Two types of models have been put forward to describe the pattern of progenitor behaviour within mammalian tissues. In the hierarchical model, a stem cell can produce proliferative progenitors with less self-renewal potential that differentiate into lineage-specific cells. Alternatively, an equivalency model has been proposed that assumes equal behaviour of progenitor cells to maintain tissue homeostasis.An elevated interest in understanding the dynamics of oesophageal epithelium has resulted, in part, from the rapid increase in the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Devesa et al, 1998). The oesophagus is a stratified epithelium that lacks any appendages or glands, and thus consists of a basal layer of proliferative keratinocytes and several suprabasal layers of differentiated cells, which are continually shed. Previously, labelling of proliferative cells with DNA analogues has demonstrated that proliferation is restricted to the basal cells, which all proliferate in 5 days seemingly stochastically, supporting an equivalency model (Marques-Periera and Leblond, 1965). In contrast, studies using chimeric mice have suggested that proliferation of labelled progenitor cells occurs in a hierarchical manner (Thomas et al, 1988; Croagh et al, 2008).To address this controversy, a recent study in Science uses several genetic mouse models to define the contribution of proliferative basal cells to oesophageal homeostasis (Doupé et al, 2012). In one mouse model, the authors utilized a genetic pulse-chase system based on the tetracycline-regulated expression of the histone H2B-GFP (Tumbar et al, 2004). They find that the rapidly dividing epithelial cells of the oesophagus lose H2B-GFP expression after 4 weeks. These data suggest that either H2B-GFP is degraded (Waghmare et al, 2008) or oesophageal progenitor cells proliferate faster than their counterparts in skin epithelial appendages or blood lineages, which retain H2B-GFP after 4 weeks (Tumbar et al, 2004; Foudi et al, 2009).To analyse the properties of oesophageal progenitor cells in more detail, the authors label single cells using an inducible cre-lox genetic system and followed clones for a year. Similar to their results with this system in the tail and ear epidermis (Clayton et al, 2007; Doupé et al, 2010), the authors find that the size of the persistent clones is linear with time. Statistical analysis of the clone size data supports the ability of the cells to contribute to proliferative and non-proliferative (i.e., differentiated) progeny with equal probability. Thus, these data support a model in which all of the labelled cells are equivalent.In addition to homeostasis, the authors explore how proliferative progenitors contribute to alterations in tissue homeostasis. After inflicting wounds by biopsy, marked clones span both proliferative and non-proliferative zones of the healing oesophageal epithelium, suggesting that they maintain a progenitor fate with distinct phenotypes. With atRA treatment, the authors show that suprabasal cell formation increases, which is consistent with the known effect of atRA on the oesophagus (Lasnitzki, 1963). Statistical analysis reveals that the probability of forming basal and suprabasal cells was not altered with atRA administration. However, since proliferative cells exist in suprabasal layers during epithelial hyperplasia, additional analyses of cell state are required to determine if atRA maintains stochastic fate decisions of progenitor cells. Furthermore, the progenitor response to atRA treatment might be limited by niche space along the basement membrane like in intestinal crypt progenitor cells (Snippert et al, 2010).In summary, this study together with the authors'' previous work provides additional support for the existence of equivalent progenitor cells within stratified epithelium in several tissues. Additional studies revealing how epithelial progenitor cells behave when proliferation and differentiation are altered in the oesophagus could shed light on mechanisms for the pathogenesis of oesophageal tumours or diseases such as Barrett''s oesophagus.     

Stimulating cROSstalk between commensal bacteria and intestinal stem cells

EMBO J (2013) 32 23, 3017–3028 10.1038/emboj.2013.224; published online October182013Commensal gut bacteria benefit their host in many ways, for instance by aiding digestion and producing vitamins. In a new study in The EMBO Journal, Jones et al (2013) report that commensal bacteria can also promote intestinal epithelial renewal in both flies and mice. Interestingly, among commensals this effect is most specific to Lactobacilli, the friendly bacteria we use to produce cheese and yogurt. Lactobacilli stimulate NADPH oxidase (dNox/Nox1)-dependent ROS production by intestinal enterocytes and thereby activate intestinal stem cells.The human gut contains huge numbers of bacteria (∼10¹⁴/person) that play beneficial roles for our health, including digestion, building our immune system and competing with harmful microbes (Sommer and Backhed, 2013). Both commensal and pathogenic bacteria can elicit antimicrobial responses in the intestinal epithelium and also stimulate epithelial turnover (Buchon et al, 2013; Sommer and Backhed, 2013). In contrast to gut pathogens, relatively little is known about how commensal bacteria influence intestinal turnover. In a simple yet elegant study reported recently in The EMBO Journal, Jones et al (2013) show that among several different commensal bacteria tested, only Lactobacilli promoted much intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation, and it did so by stimulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Interestingly, the specific effect of Lactobacilli was similar in both Drosophila and mice. In addition to distinguishing functional differences between species of commensals, this work suggests how the ingestion of Lactobacillus-containing probiotic supplements or food (e.g., yogurt) might support epithelial turnover and health.In both mammals and insects, ISCs give rise to intestinal enterocytes, which not only absorb nutrients from the diet but must also interact with the gut microbiota (Jiang and Edgar, 2012). The metazoan intestinal epithelium has developed conserved responses to enteric bacteria, for instance the expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs; Gallo and Hooper, 2012; Buchon et al, 2013), presumably to kill harmful bacteria while allowing symbiotic commensals to flourish. In addition to AMPs, intestinal epithelial cells use NADPH family oxidases to generate ROS that are used as microbicides (Lambeth and Neish, 2013). High ROS levels during enteric infections likely act non-discriminately against both commensals and pathogens, but controlled, low-level ROS can act as signalling molecules that regulate various cellular processes including proliferation (Lambeth and Neish, 2013). In flies, exposure to pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria has been reported to result in ROS (H₂O₂) production by an enzyme called dual oxidase (Duox; Ha et al, 2005). Duox activity in the fly intestine (and likely also the mammalian one) has recently been discovered to be stimulated by uracil secretion by pathogenic bacteria (Lee et al, 2013). In the mammalian intestine another enzyme, NADPH oxidase (Nox), has also been shown to produce ROS in the form of superoxide (O₂⁻), in this case in response to formylated bacterial peptides (Lambeth and Neish, 2013). A conserved role for Nox in the Drosophila intestinal epithelium had not until now been explored.Jones et al (2013) checked seven different commensal bacterial to see which would stimulate ROS production by the fly''s intestinal epithelium, and found that only one species, a Gram-positive Lactobacillus, could stimulate significant production of ROS in intestinal enterocytes. Five bacterial species were checked in mice or cultured intestinal cells, and again it was a Lactobacillus that generated the strongest ROS response. Although not all of the most prevalent enteric bacteria were assayed, those others that were—such as E. coli—induced only mild, barely detectable levels of ROS in enterocytes. Surprisingly, although bacteria pathogenic to Drosophila, like Erwinia caratovora, were expected to stimulate ROS production via Duox, Jones et al (2013) did not observe this using the ROS detecting dye hydrocyanine-Cy3, or a ROS-sensitive transgene reporter, Glutatione S-transferase-GFP, in flies. Further, Jones et al (2013) found that genetically suppressing Nox in either Drosophila or mice decreased ROS production after Lactobacillus ingestion. Consistent with the important role of Nox, Duox appeared not to be required for ROS production after Lactobacillus ingestion. In addition, Jones et al (2013) found that Lactobacilli also promoted DNA replication—a metric of cell proliferation and epithelial renewal—in the fly''s intestine, and that this was also ROS- and Nox-dependent. Again, the same relationship was found in the mouse small intestine. Together, these results suggest a conserved mechanism by which Lactobacilli can stimulate Nox-dependent ROS production in intestinal enterocytes and thereby promote ISC proliferation and enhance gut epithelial renewal.In the fly midgut, uracil produced by pathogenic bacteria can stimulate Duox-dependent ROS production, which is thought to act as a microbicide (Lee et al, 2013), and can also promote ISC proliferation (Buchon et al, 2009). However, Duox-produced ROS may also damage the intestinal epithelium itself and thereby promote epithelial regeneration indirectly through stress responses. In this disease scenario, ROS appears to be sensed by the stress-activated Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK; Figure 1A), which can induce pro-proliferative cytokines of the Leptin/IL-6 family (Unpaireds, Upd1–3) (Buchon et al, 2009; Jiang et al, 2009). These cytokines activate JAK/STAT signalling in the ISCs, promoting their growth and proliferation, and accelerating regenerative repair of the gut epithelium (Buchon et al, 2009; Jiang et al, 2009). It is also possible, however, that low-level ROS, or specific types of ROS (e.g., H₂O₂) might induce ISC proliferation directly by acting as a signal between enterocytes and ISCs. Since commensal Lactobacillus stimulates ROS production via Nox rather than Duox, this might be a case in which a non-damaging ROS signal promotes intestinal epithelial renewal without stress signalling or a microbicidal effect (Figure 1B). However, Jones et al (2013) stopped short of ruling out a role for oxidative damage, cell death or stress signalling in the intestinal epithelium following colonization by Lactobacilli, and so these parameters must be checked in future studies. Perhaps even the friendliest symbiotes cause a bit of ‘healthy'' damage to the gut lining, stimulating it to refresh and renew. Whether damage-dependent or not, the stimulation of Drosophila ISC proliferation by commensals and pathogens alike appears to involve the same cytokine (Upd3; Buchon et al, 2009), and so some of the differences between truly pathogenic and ‘friendly'' gut microbes might be ascribed more to matters of degree than qualitative distinctions. Future studies exploring exactly how different types of ROS signals stimulate JNK activity, gut cytokine expression and epithelial renewal should be able to sort this out, and perhaps help us learn how to better manage the ecosystems in our own bellies. From the lovely examples reported by Jones et al (2013), an experimental back-and-forth between the Drosophila and mouse intestine seems an informative way to go.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Metazoan intestinal epithelial responses to commensal and pathogenic bacteria. (A) High reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels generated by dual oxidase (Duox) in response to uracil secretion by pathogenic bacteria. (B) Low ROS levels generated by NADPH oxidase (Nox) in response to commensal bacteria. In addition to acting as a microbiocide, ROS in flies may stimulate JNK signaling and cytokine (Upd 1–3) expression in enterocytes, thereby stimulating ISC proliferation and epithelial turnover or regeneration. Whether this stimulation required damage to or loss of enterocytes has yet to be explored.     

Amphisomes: out of the autophagosome shadow?

EMBO J (2013) 32: 3130–3144 doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.233; published online November012013Amphisomes are intermediate organelles, formed during autophagy through the fusion between autophagosomes and endosomes. Complex multivesicular vacuoles that resemble amphisomes have been observed in various cell types, but whether they have cellular roles other than being a precursor structure is still enigmatic. While autophagy-related (ATG) proteins interact with the endocytic pathways in other processes different from autophagy, Patel and colleagues now report that these factors come together to generate amphisome-like compartments that regulate mucin secretion in goblet cells.ATG and endosomal proteins have been linked to secretion, and the specific loss of them impairs the function of different secretory cell types (Jung et al, 2008; DeSelm et al, 2011; Ushio et al, 2011; Sasidharan et al, 2012). ATG proteins have also been shown to interact with the endocytic pathway in few situations that do not involve autophagy. For example in phagocytic cells, the surface of bacteria-containing phagosomes acquires LC3/Atg8 through the concerted action of a subpopulation of ATG proteins. This process, which has been termed LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP), promotes the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes (Sanjuan et al, 2007). Something similar occurs during entotic cell death, an engulfment programme leading to the elimination of cells into lysosomes. The entotic vacuole membranes surrounding the internalized cells also recruit LC3 through a mechanism that depends on several ATG proteins, but not on autophagosome formation (Florey et al, 2011).In their work aimed to understand the function of ATG proteins in goblet cells, Patel et al (2013) show that the autophagy and endocytic machinery converge at the amphisomes to promote the secretion of mucins. In the gastrointestinal tract, secretory cells have a crucial role in providing the mucus barrier that protects against intestinal pathogens. Mucins, the main components of the mucus, are produced in goblet cells where large polymers of these highly glycosylated proteins are packed into secretory granules that accumulate at the apical surface. The release of these mucin granules relies on a series of cellular events that are tightly coordinated. Patel et al (2013) show that knockout mice lacking ATG5 in the intestinal epithelium, that is, Atg5VC mice, exhibit both a dramatic accumulation of mucin granules in goblet cells and a diminished mucus secretion. Taking advantage of a newly developed in vitro system to culture and differentiate intestinal epithelial stem cells into secretory goblet cells, the authors also demonstrate that the ablation of other ATG proteins causes the same phenotype showing that the autophagy machinery is required for mucin secretion in these specialized cells (Patel et al, 2013). Interestingly, ATG proteins affect the functionality of another gastrointestinal secretory lineage, the Paneth cells. Paneth cells homozygous for the atg16L1 risk allele, associated with Crohn disease, produce less secretory granules than in controls (Cadwell et al, 2008). This suggests that although ATG proteins regulate secretion in the two most abundant secretory lineages in the intestinal tract, two different mechanisms are probably involved.A microarray analysis of mRNA from Atg5VC mouse colonic epithelial cells revealed a possible alteration in the endocytic pathway. Indeed, blocking endocytosis also provoked an accumulation of mucin granules. While LC3B has been previously found on the surface of secretory granules (Ushio et al, 2011; Ishibashi et al, 2012), immuno-electron microscopy of wild-type mouse intestinal tissue revealed a distribution of LC3B not on mucin granules, but on multivesicular vacuoles positive for several endosomal proteins (Patel et al, 2013). Because of the morphological and molecular characteristics of these compartments, it appears that the ATG proteins together with the endocytic pathway regulate secretion in goblet cells by converging in what could be a new amphisome-like organelle (Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic representation for the regulated secretion of mucin granules by amphisome-like structures in goblet cells. ROS generated by NADPH oxidases promote the fusion of LC3-positive vesicles with endosomes marked by Rab5 and containing the NADPH oxidase subunit p22phox. The resulting amphisomes-like organelles are decorated with LC3, endosomal proteins (Rab5, Rab7 and EEA1) and p22phox and localize near the mucin granules. The formation of these copartments probably prolong and/or enhance the production of ROS by the NADPH oxidase, which in turn increases the levels of cytoplasmic calcium through an unknown mechanism leading to the release of the mucin granules.NADPH oxidases are known to be present in endosomes, and NADPH oxidase-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) are necessary for LC3 recruitment to phagosomes.(Huang et al, 2009). Patel et al (2013) thus explored whether these enzymes played a role in mucin granule secretion in goblet cells. Indeed, expression of a mutant form of p22phox, a transmembrane subunit of several NADPH oxidase complexes, altered the exocytosis of these carriers. Moreover, p22phox was found to localize to Rab5-positive endosomes and also with the observed amphisome-like structures (Figure 1). Because a mutant form of p22phox also caused a misslocalization of both LC3 and the early-endosomal marker protein EEA1, the obvious conclusion was that ROS production by endosomes is necessary to trigger the formation of the amphisome-like organelles via the acquisition of the ATG machinery (Figure 1). Interestingly, addition of H₂O₂ that mimics ROS generation was able to induce mucin granule exocytosis in the p22phox mutant cells, showing that ROS was also required to regulate secretion in goblet cells (Patel et al, 2013). Furthermore, H₂O₂ bypassed as well the mucin granule secretion defect in autophagy and endocytosis-deficient goblet cells through an increase of cytosolic calcium levels (Patel et al, 2013). This, together with the observation that the loss of ATG5 and the block of the endocytic pathway impair the production of ROS has led Patel et al (2013) to propose that amphisome-like organelles are a signalling platform, where NADPH oxidase-driven ROS production promotes the release of the mucin granules.Amphisomes have been characterized and defined as autophagic vacuoles formed upon fusion between autophagosomes and endosomes. Given that ATG and endosomal proteins converge in multivesicular and/or vacuolar compartments resembling amphisomes in cellular processes independent of autophagy, one could consider to use the term amphisomes to describe a more heterogenous and ampler population of unnamed compartments where part of the autophagy and endosomal machineries co-localize. Based on this consideration, the study by Patel et al (2013) has identified an amphisome-like structure where molecular events interconnect to trigger granule secretion. While their work adds to the still limited number of non-degradative roles of the autophagic pathway, which include unconventional secretion (Subramani and Malhotra, 2013), it is one of the first reports highlighting that amphisomes (or any autophagosomal intermediate structure) could be more than just a transport intermediate, and at least in goblet cells, they could act as a platform where signals integrating some aspects of the cell physiology are elicited.Though it remains to be establish whether the organelles described by Patel et al (2013) are indeed amphisomes, especially as they are formed by fusion of endosomes with LC3-positive single-membrane vesicles rather than LC3-positive double-membrane autophagosomes, their study raises some intriguing questions. Are these compartments persistent or will they eventually fuse with lysosomes? Why has the cell opted to signal from amphisomes and not from endosomes, where the NADPH oxidases are normally present? Maybe the answer to these questions is hidden in the transient life of amphisomes. In the most classical signalling pathways, the transduction cascade amplifies the initial cue but it also turn it off subsequently through negative feedback loops. This permits to precisely modulate the signal output temporally (and locally). The amphisome-like structures observed in goblet cells could also act as the molecular switch for the signal-stimulating mucin granule secretion. The ROS generated initially from endosomes would trigger the recruitment of LC3 through vesicle fusion events, and the production of this second messenger will be prolonged and/or enhanced in the resulting amphisomes-like structure, leading to a stimulation of mucin granule exocytosis (Figure 1). The subsequent fusion of the amphisomes with lysosomes could lead to the termination of the signal. Other scenarios, however, cannot be excluded like, for example, the delivery of a protein enhancing the NADPH oxidase activity to the endosomes by the LC3-positive vesicles.While these are just hypotheses, it is clear that Patel et al (2013) have opened a window on a new and unexplored area of the autophagy field. Future investigations will tell us whether what observed in goblet cells is a unique situation or the intermediate organelles characterizing autophagy can carry out cellular functions different from the one delivering unwanted structures into the lysosome interior for degradation, including to serve as signalling platforms.     

A bacterial actin unites to divide bacterial cells

EMBO J 31 10, 2249–2260 (2012); published online March302012Once thought to exist only in eukaryotic cells, the highly conserved bacterial cytoskeleton is now known to function analogously to its eukaryotic counterparts, particularly in cell shape and division. For instance, the actin-like MreB protein and its homologs are important to maintain cell shape in many rod-shaped bacteria, probably by organizing how peptidoglycan is synthesized. FtsZ, a tubulin homolog, forms a scaffold for the cytokinetic ring, or divisome, by GTP-dependent polymerization into protofilaments. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Szwedziak et al (2012) reveal the first crystal structures of cell division protein FtsA polymerizing into actin-like filaments, along with in vivo evidence that this self-interaction is crucial for proper cell division.FtsA is an actin homolog required for cytokinesis in many bacterial species and has several key roles in cell division, including helping to tether FtsZ to the cytoplasmic membrane via a membrane-targeting sequence (MTS), recruiting other essential proteins to the divisome, and perhaps promoting divisome constriction (de Boer, 2010). Szwedziak et al (2012) recapitulate the FtsZ-FtsA-membrane association in vitro using liposomes with FtsZ and FtsA proteins from Thermotoga maritima. To get a closer look at the FtsA-FtsZ interface, the authors co-crystallize FtsA with the carboxy-terminal tail of FtsZ, which is known to interact with FtsA. Intriguingly, the crystal reveals an FtsA homodimer. Contrary to the previous bioinformatics model of FtsA self-interaction that proposed a 180° rotation between the two subunits (Carettoni et al, 2003), the FtsA-FtsA interface in the crystal structure shows no rotation, similar to F-actin. Szwedziak et al (2012) also show that FtsA can form longer, actin-like polymers in the presence of non-hydrolysable ATP or on lipid monolayers. These results are surprising because FtsA has a divergent subdomain architecture compared to other actin-family proteins (van den Ent and Löwe).A critical question now is whether FtsA needs to form polymers in vivo to function properly. Purified Streptococcus pneumoniae FtsA assembles into large polymers that are not like F-actin, and it remains unclear if these structures are relevant in vivo (Krupka et al, 2012). Wild-type FtsA proteins do not form detectable filaments in cells, but C-terminal truncations of FtsA that remove the MTS form polymers quite readily in cells when overproduced, although they are not functional (Pichoff and Lutkenhaus, 2007). Even so, starting with an MTS truncation derivative of FtsA to visualize in vivo polymers, Szwedziak et al (2012) design site-directed mutants of Bacillus subtilis FtsA based on the FtsA-FtsA interface of their crystals; these fail to assemble into polymers in vivo. Using a similar MTS truncation derivative, Pichoff et al (2012) created random mutations in Escherichia coli FtsA, and found that those mapping to the same interface found by Szwedziak et al (2012) also disrupted polymer formation. Together, these data suggest that these residues are needed for FtsA self-interaction. Perplexingly, when these mutants were subsequently tested for functionality in the context of full-length FtsA, the results were mixed. Pichoff et al (2012) showed that FtsA mutants deficient for self-interaction in E. coli have a gain-of-function phenotype, whereas Szwedziak et al (2012) report that analogous mutants in B. subtilis FtsA suffer a loss of function. These results support the idea that FtsA self-association is related to its activity (Shiomi and Margolin, 2007), yet understanding how self-interaction regulates FtsA function clearly requires further study.The ability of eukaryotic cytoskeletal proteins to form long polymers is essential to their function, but the physiological relevance of long polymer formation by bacterial cytoskeletal proteins is now a topic of debate (Figure 1). For example, it has been hypothesized that FtsZ protofilaments wrap around the entire circumference of the cell to form the cytokinetic ring. However, recent studies using photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and electron cryotomography reveal a different model in which FtsZ forms a series of very short polymers that overlap to encompass the diameter of the cell (Li et al, 2007; Fu et al, 2010). MreB was also originally thought to form long-range helical polymers extending the length of the cell, but recent data obtained with more sophisticated microscopic techniques suggest that MreB is distributed in patches that move circumferentially and independently (White and Gober, 2012). It is not yet clear which of these models represents the true cellular architecture of MreB, although it is likely that some degree of MreB polymerization is still needed for function. It is notable that other bacterial homologs of actin and tubulin used for generating scaffolds or partitioning plasmid DNA, but not for essential cellular processes such as cell division and growth, tend to form long polymers that extend throughout the cell (Pogliano, 2008). The continued combined use of microscopic, biochemical, and genetic methods, as demonstrated by Szwedziak et al (2012) will enhance future understanding of ancestral tubulin and actin proteins in prokaryotes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Bacterial actin and tubulin filaments involved in cell growth and division. (A) MreB (purple) has long been thought of as a spiral filament twisting along the cell length to control cell shape. Likewise, FtsZ protofilaments (blue) were once thought to wrap around the cell midpoint to organize the divisome. (B) Recent work using high-resolution microscopy has revealed that long cytoskeletal filaments are more likely to be short patches of polymers. The present work by Szwedziak et al (2012) has added FtsA actin-like filaments (green) to the model of possible divisome architecture.     

Wnts need a p(assport)24 to leave the ER

Wnts are secreted through a dedicated exocytic pathway, which has been only partly characterized. Here, Palmer and colleagues comment on two recent reports by the groups of K. Basler and M. Boutros, respectively, in which they show that p24 proteins take part in this exocytic route and are required for Wnt exit from the ER to the Golgi.EMBO Rep (2011) advance online publication. doi:10.1038/embor.2011.212Wnt signalling proteins regulate diverse cellular processes during development and homeostasis. Since misregulation of Wnt signalling is associated with cancer, most research has been aimed at characterizing the signal transduction pathway. Recently, attention has focused on Wnt production due to the identification of factors required specifically for Wnt secretion. For instance, the specific requirement of Evi, also known as Wntless or Sprinter, suggested that Wnts might follow a specialized secretory route (Banziger et al, 2006; Bartscherer et al, 2006). Two recent papers published in EMBO reports by the groups of Konrad Basler in last month''s issue, and Michael Boutros in this issue, show that Wnt secretion requires the activity of p24 family members (Buechling et al, 2011; Port et al, 2011). Therefore, the specialized route might begin at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exit sites.Wnts are secreted glycoproteins that can act many cell diameters from their source of production. Most, but not all Wnt proteins, are acylated and thus associate tightly with cellular membranes. Despite this association, acylated Wnts can be released from secreting cells and spread in the extracellular space (Bartscherer & Boutros, 2008; Port & Basler, 2010). Acylation of Wnts, which occurs in the ER, is thought to be mediated by the N-acetyl transferase encoded by porcupine (porc; van den Heuvel et al, 1993). After acylation, Wnt proteins associate with Evi, a multipass transmembrane protein found mostly at the Golgi and the plasma membrane (Fig 1A). This association is essential for the secretion of the Wnts that are acylated since, in the absence of Evi, they accumulate on internal membranes (Banziger et al, 2006; Bartscherer et al, 2006). It is therefore thought that acylated Wnts require Evi to exit the Golgi and progress to the cell surface (Port et al, 2008). This does not seem to be a requirement for non-lipidated Wnts, such as Drosophila WntD, which are secreted in the absence of Evi (Ching et al, 2008). Similarly, secretion of other signalling proteins proceeds normally without Evi. After reaching the cell surface, Evi is likely to have a choice between various routes. One such route, which involves the retromer complex, takes it back to the Golgi where it can participate in another round of Wnt secretion (Fig 1A). Alternatively, Evi can be targeted to lysosomes (Bartscherer & Boutros, 2008; Port & Basler, 2010). The factors that determine Evi transport remain poorly understood. Nevertheless, these studies highlight the essential and specific role of Evi for the secretion of lipidated Wnts.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Model summarizing the suggested roles of p24 proteins in endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport of Wg. (A) Schematic of a cell showing the current model of the Wg secretory pathway. Wg is produced in the ER where it is lipid-modified by Porc, and moved to the Golgi with the assistance of p24 proteins. In the Golgi, Wg joins Evi, which facilitates Wg transport to the cell surface. Evi is then recycled back to the Golgi in a path mediated by the retromer complex. (B)(i) In the absence of p24 proteins, there is no recruitment of Wg to COPII-coated vesicles and therefore a block of secretion in the ER. (ii) Port et al (2011) propose a similar model in which CHOp24/Emp24 and Éclair are involved in Wg recruitment, although only CHOp24/Emp24 binds to Wg. (iii) According to Buechling et al (2011), Opm recruits Wg to COPII-coated vesicles for movement to the Golgi. CHOp24 and p24-1 are also required for this process. ER, endoplasmic reticulum.Two groups have now reported the use of cell-based RNA interference (RNAi) screens to identify further proteins required for the secretion of Wingless (Wg), the main Drosophila Wnt (Buechling et al, 2011; Port et al, 2011). They found that p24 family members, a group of proteins previously implicated in both retrograde and anterograde transport between the ER and Golgi (Strating & Martens, 2009), are required for Wg secretion by S2 cells. Similarly, knockdown by transgenic RNAi shows that p24 proteins are required for normal levels of Wg secretion in Drosophila wing imaginal discs (Buechling et al, 2011; Port et al, 2011). As with Evi, this requirement seems to be relatively specific, since general secretion and the secretion of other signalling proteins, including the lipid-modified morphogen Hedgehog, are unaffected by p24 knockdown. Buechling et al also assessed the role of p24 proteins in WntD secretion. They found that RNAi against opossum (opm), one of the p24 members, prevents WntD secretion in cultured cells. They also show that the phenotypes of opm mutants and WntD mutant embryos resemble each other (Buechling et al, 2011). Therefore, while Evi is specifically required for the secretion of acylated Wnts, p24 proteins could contribute to the secretion of all Wnts. This function is likely to be conserved since the mammalian homologue of Opm, TMED5, is required for Wnt1 signalling, at least in a mammalian cell culture assay (Buechling et al, 2011).To gain understanding of the role of p24 proteins in Wnt secretion, both groups analysed the subcellular localization of Wg following p24 knockdown. They found accumulation in the ER and concomitant depletion in the Golgi, as indicated by reduced co-localization with Golgi markers (Fig 1Bi). They also found that p24 knockdown prevents Wg from stabilizing Evi in producing cells, suggesting that the stabilizing influence of Wg requires its exit from the ER (Buechling et al, 2011; Port et al, 2011). These results lead the authors to propose that the loss of p24 prevents the transport of Wg from the ER to the Golgi. Importantly, immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that Wg might interact physically with Opm and Emp24 (also known as CHOp24). This led both sets of authors to postulate a model whereby p24 proteins act as cargo receptors to escort Wnt proteins from the ER to the Golgi, whereupon they can bind to Evi, which will escort them to the plasma membrane. Thus, in this context, p24 proteins seem to have an anterograde function.Although both studies highlight the role of p24 proteins in Wnt secretion, they disagree on the relative importance of the various family members. Among the nine predicted p24 proteins encoded by the Drosophila genome, only Éclair and Emp24/CHOp24 were found to be required for Wg secretion by Port et al (2011; Fig 1Bii). By contrast, Buechling et al found that Opm, Emp24/CHOp24 and p24-1 all play a role in Wg secretion (fig 1Biii). Thus, only Emp24/CHOp24 is found by both groups to be essential for Wg secretion. Although functional redundancy among p24 proteins could explain why the removal of a single p24 protein has a relatively weak phenotype, there is no simple explanation as to why the very similar assays used by the two groups do not lead to identical conclusions. These differences could be worked out by the exchange of reagents and protocols.Regardless of the discrepancies, the two studies provide an important step in our understanding of Wnt secretion by demonstrating that Wnts engage with specialized components of the secretory machinery as early as in the ER. It might be relevant that the anterograde function of p24 proteins is directed at glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, which have been shown to partition in raft-like microdomains (Strating & Martens, 2009). It is conceivable that GPI-anchored proteins, as well as Wnts, gather in a subdomain of the ER where they could both interact with p24 proteins and set off along their specialized secretory pathways. Wnt targeting to specialized membrane domains could in principle be mediated by their lipid moieties (Bartscherer & Boutros, 2008; Port & Basler, 2010). However, the process might turn out to be more complex if it is confirmed that p24 proteins are also required for the secretion of non-acylated Wnts (for example, WntD), as suggested by Buechling et al. In any case, it will be interesting to determine the precise molecular mechanism underlying the functional interaction between Wnts and p24 proteins as it is likely to explain how Wnts are allowed to exit the ER and start their journey out of the cell.     

Enlightening the impact of immunogenic cell death in photodynamic cancer therapy

EMBO J 31 5, 1062–1079 (2012); published online January172012In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Garg et al (2012) delineate a signalling pathway that leads to calreticulin (CRT) exposure and ATP release by cancer cells that succumb to photodynamic therapy (PTD), thereby providing fresh insights into the molecular regulation of immunogenic cell death (ICD).The textbook notion that apoptosis would always take place unrecognized by the immune system has recently been invalidated (Zitvogel et al, 2010; Galluzzi et al, 2012). Thus, in specific circumstances (in particular in response to anthracyclines, oxaliplatin, and γ irradiation), cancer cells can enter a lethal stress pathway linked to the emission of a spatiotemporally defined combination of signals that is decoded by the immune system to activate tumour-specific immune responses (Zitvogel et al, 2010). These signals include the pre-apoptotic exposure of intracellular proteins such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperon CRT and the heat-shock protein HSP90 at the cell surface, the pre-apoptotic secretion of ATP, and the post-apoptotic release of the nuclear protein HMGB1 (Zitvogel et al, 2010). Together, these processes (and perhaps others) constitute the molecular determinants of ICD.In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Garg et al (2012) add hypericin-based PTD (Hyp-PTD) to the list of bona fide ICD inducers and convincingly link Hyp-PTD-elicited ICD to the functional activation of the immune system. Moreover, Garg et al (2012) demonstrate that Hyp-PDT stimulates ICD via signalling pathways that overlap with—but are not identical to—those elicited by anthracyclines, which constitute the first ICD inducers to be characterized (Casares et al, 2005; Zappasodi et al, 2010; Fucikova et al, 2011).Intrigued by the fact that the ER stress response is required for anthracycline-induced ICD (Panaretakis et al, 2009), Garg et al (2012) decided to investigate the immunogenicity of Hyp-PDT (which selectively targets the ER). Hyp-PDT potently stimulated CRT exposure and ATP release in human bladder carcinoma T24 cells. As a result, T24 cells exposed to Hyp-PDT (but not untreated cells) were engulfed by Mf4/4 macrophages and human dendritic cells (DCs), the most important antigen-presenting cells in antitumour immunity. Similarly, murine colon carcinoma CT26 cells succumbing to Hyp-PDT (but not cells dying in response to the unspecific ER stressor tunicamycin) were preferentially phagocytosed by murine JAWSII DCs, and efficiently immunized syngenic BALB/c mice against a subsequent challenge with living cells of the same type. Of note, contrarily to T24 cells treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or dying from accidental necrosis, T24 cells exposed to Hyp-PDT activated DCs while eliciting a peculiar functional profile, featuring high levels of NO production and absent secretion of immunosuppressive interleukin-10 (IL-10) (Garg et al, 2012). Moreover upon co-culture with Hyp-PDT-treated T24 cells, human DCs were found to secrete high levels of IL-1β, a cytokine that is required for the adequate polarization of interferon γ (IFNγ)-producing antineoplastic CD8⁺ T cells (Aymeric et al, 2010). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Hyp-PDT induces bona fide ICD, eliciting an antitumour immune response.By combining pharmacological and genetic approaches, Garg et al (2012) then investigated the molecular cascades that are required for Hyp-PDT-induced CRT exposure and ATP release. They found that CRT exposure triggered by Hyp-PDT requires reactive oxygen species (as demonstrated with the ¹O₂ quencher L-histidine), class I phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) activity (as shown with the chemical inhibitor wortmannin and the RNAi-mediated depletion of the catalytic PI3K subunit p110), the actin cytoskeleton (as proven with the actin inhibitor latrunculin B), the ER-to-Golgi anterograde transport (as shown using brefeldin A), the ER stress-associated kinase PERK, the pro-apoptotic molecules BAX and BAK as well as the CRT cell surface receptor CD91 (as demonstrated by their knockout or RNAi-mediated depletion). However, there were differences in the signalling pathways leading to CRT exposure in response to anthracyclines (Panaretakis et al, 2009) and Hyp-PDT (Garg et al, 2012). In contrast to the former, the latter was not accompanied by the exposure of the ER chaperon ERp57, and did not require eIF2α phosphorylation (as shown with non-phosphorylatable eIF2α mutants), caspase-8 activity (as shown with the pan-caspase blocker Z-VAD.fmk, upon overexpression of the viral caspase inhibitor CrmA and following the RNAi-mediated depletion of caspase-8), and increased cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations (as proven with cytosolic Ca²⁺ chelators and overexpression of the ER Ca²⁺ pump SERCA). Moreover, Hyp-PDT induced the translocation of CRT at the cell surface irrespective of retrograde transport (as demonstrated with the microtubular poison nocodazole) and lipid rafts (as demonstrated with the cholesterol-depleting agent methyl-β-cyclodextrine). Of note, ATP secretion in response to Hyp-PDT depended on the ER-to-Golgi anterograde transport, PI3K and PERK activity (presumably due to their role in the regulation of secretory pathways), but did not require BAX and BAK (Garg et al, 2012). Since PERK can stimulate autophagy in the context of ER stress (Kroemer et al, 2010), it is tempting to speculate that autophagy is involved in Hyp-PDT-elicited ATP secretion, as this appears to be to the case during anthracycline-induced ICD (Michaud et al, 2011).Altogether, the intriguing report by Garg et al (2012) demonstrates that the stress signalling pathways leading to ICD depend—at least in part—on the initiating stimulus (Figure 1). Speculatively, this points to the coexistence of a ‘core'' ICD signalling pathway (which would be common to several, if not all, ICD inducers) with ‘private'' molecular cascades (which would be activated in a stimulus-dependent fashion). Irrespective of these details, the work by Garg et al (2012) further underscores the importance of anticancer immune responses elicited by established and experimental therapies.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Molecular mechanisms of immunogenic cell death (ICD). At least three processes underlie the immunogenicity of cell death: the pre-apoptotic exposure of calreticulin (CRT) at the cell surface, the secretion of ATP, and the post-apoptotic release of HMGB1. ICD can be triggered by multiple stimuli, including photodynamic therapy, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and some types of radiotherapy. The signalling pathways elicited by distinct ICD inducers overlap, but are not identical. In red are indicated molecules and processes that—according to current knowledge—may be required for CRT exposure and ATP secretion in response to most, if not all, ICD inducers. The molecular determinants of the immunogenic release of HMGB1 remain poorly understood. ER, endoplasmic reticulum; P-eIF2α, phosphorylated eIF2α; PI3K, class I phosphoinositide-3-kinase; ROS, reactive oxygen species.     

A structural road map to unveil basal body composition and assembly

EMBO J 31 3, 552–562 (2012); published online December132011The Basal Body (BB) acts as the template for the axoneme, the microtubule-based structure of cilia and flagella. Although several proteins were recently implicated in both centriole and BB assembly and function, their molecular mechanisms are still poorly characterized. In this issue of The EMBO journal, Li and coworkers describe for the first time the near-native structure of the BB at 33 Å resolution obtained by Cryo-Electron Microscopy analysis of wild-type (WT) isolated Chlamydomonas BBs. They identified several uncharacterized non-tubulin structures and variations along the length of the BB, which likely reflect the binding and function of numerous macromolecular complexes. These complexes are expected to define BB intrinsic properties, such as its characteristic structure and stability. Similarly to the high-resolution structures of ribosome and nuclear pore complexes, this study will undoubtedly contribute towards the future analysis of centriole and BB biogenesis, maintenance and function.The microtubule (MT)-based structure of the cilium/flagellum grows from the distal part of the Basal Body (BB), which in many animal cells develops from the mature centriole in the centrosome. Electron microscopic (EM) images of chemically fixed resin-embedded centrioles and basal bodies (CBBs) suggest that their ultrastructure is similar, and that their key components are MTs. The mechanisms underlying the organization of CBB MTs, comprising highly stable closed and open MTs, are likely to hold many surprises as they are remarkably different from other microtubular structures in the cell. Additionally, non-MT-based structures are also part of the CBB, including a cartwheel in the proximal lumen region that reinforces CBB symmetry (reviewed in Azimzadeh and Marshall, 2010 and Carvalho-Santos et al, 2011).Several centriole components and BB proteins were identified by comparative and/or functional genomics and proteomics studies of purified CBBs (reviewed in Azimzadeh and Marshall, 2010 and Carvalho-Santos et al, 2011). Advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of CBB assembly depend on high-resolution comparative studies of wild-type (WT) and mutant structures, as well as characterization of the localization of molecular complexes within the small CBB structure. Despite the existence of beautiful ultrastructure data acquired from chemically fixed specimens (Geimer and Melkonian, 2004; Ibrahim et al, 2009), high-resolution structures of native CBBs were missing. Using electron cryo-tomography and 3D subtomogram averaging, Li et al (2012) solved the structure of the near-native BB triplet at 33 Å resolution. A pseudo-atomic model of the tubulin protofilaments at the core of the triplets was built by fitting the atomic structure of α/β-tubulin monomers into the BB tomograms.The 3D density map reveals several additional densities that represent non-tubulin proteins attached, both internally and externally, to all triplet MTs, some linking MTs inside the triplets and/or MTs in consecutive triplets (Li et al, 2012; for a summary, see Li et al, 2012; Geimer and Melkonian, 2004; Ibrahim et al, 2009), but with less detail and complexity. The authors speculate that some of the additional densities present at the A- and B-tubule inner wall might correspond to proteins of the tektin family, probably conferring rigidity to the BB triplet (Amos, 2008).

Table 1

Characteristics of the non-α/β-tubulin structures reported in Li et al (2012) in this issue of The EMBO journal

Compact Parkin only: insights into the structure of an autoinhibited ubiquitin ligase

EMBO J 32 15, 2099–2112 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.125; published online May312013Mutations in Parkin represent ∼50% of disease-causing defects in autosomal recessive-juvenile onset Parkinson''s disease (AR-JP). Recently, there have been four structural reports of autoinhibited forms of this RING-IBR-RING (RBR) ubiquitin ligase (E3) by the Gehring, Komander, Johnston and Shaw groups. The important advances from these studies set the stage for the next steps in understanding the molecular basis for Parkinson''s disease (PD).Regulated protein degradation requires that E3s and their access to substrates be exquisitely controlled. RBR family E3s provide striking examples of this regulation. The complex and compact structures of Parkin (Riley et al, 2013; Spratt et al, 2013; Trempe et al, 2013; Wauer and Komander, 2013) as well as another RBR E3, human homologue of Ariadne (HHARI) (Duda et al, 2013), demonstrate extraordinarily intricate inter-domain arrangements. These autoinhibited structures ensure that their functions are restricted until activated.Until recently, RBR E3s were believed to be a subclass of RING E3s, which allosterically activate E2 conjugated with ubiquitin (E2∼Ub). However, Wenzel et al (2011) determined that they are actually hybrid E3s, containing an E2 binding site in RING1 and a catalytic cysteine residue in the domain designated as RING2. The catalytic cysteine is an acceptor for an ubiquitin from RING1-bound E2∼Ub forming an intermediate (E3∼Ub) that leads to substrate or autoubiquitination. In this way, RBRs resemble HECT E3s, which also form catalytic intermediates in ubiquitination. There are 13 human RBR family E3s. Besides Parkin, two notable RBRs are HOIL-1 and HOIP, which form part of a complex integral to NF-κB activation (Wenzel and Klevit, 2012).In addition to causal roles in AR-JP, single allele mutations of Parkin are found in some sporadic cases of PD (references in Wauer and Komander, 2013). Mutations in the Parkin-associated kinase PINK1, which is upstream of Parkin, also account for a significant number of AR-JP cases (Hardy et al, 2009; Narendra et al, 2012; Lazarou et al, 2013). A number of diverse Parkin substrates have been postulated to be associated with PD. There is substantial evidence that one role for Parkin is at mitochondria. Once activated and recruited to damaged/depolarized mitochondria by PINK1, it ubiquitinates exposed mitochondrial proteins leading to both proteasomal degradation and mitophagy (Narendra et al, 2012; Sarraf et al, 2013). Parkin has also been implicated in cell surface signalling and as a tumour suppressor (see references in Wauer and Komander, 2013).Parkin encodes five structured domains, beginning with an N-terminal ubiquitin-like domain (UbLD) and followed by four domains that each bind two zinc (Zn) atoms (Figure 1A). The most N-terminal of the Zn-binding domains is RING0. C-terminal to this is the RBR, consisting of RING1, the IBR and RING2. The crystal structures of inactive Parkin from Riley et al (2013), Trempe et al (2013) and Wauer and Komander (2013) show remarkable congruity. Spatially, the IBR is at the complete opposite end of the molecule from RING2, to which it is connected by a partially unstructured ∼37 residue linker. This linker includes a two-turn helix, referred to as the repressor element of Parkin (REP) or tether, which binds and occludes the E2 binding face of RING1. RING1 occupies the central position in these structures, and RING0 separates RING1 from RING2 (Figure 1B and C). The latter contains the residue identified by Wenzel et al (2011), and confirmed by all three groups, to be the catalytic cysteine, C431. A lower resolution structure also includes the UbLD and places this domain adjacent to RING1 (Trempe et al, 2013). A second unstructured linker connects the UbLD and RING0. UbLDs are involved in a number of protein–protein interactions and small angle X-ray scattering confirms that this domain is integral to the core structure of Parkin (Spratt et al, 2013; Trempe et al, 2013). Biophysical characterization of Parkin and HHARI suggests that each is a monomer in solution.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic and spatial representation of Parkin. (A) Primary structure and domain designations of Parkin, including the REP sequence within the otherwise unstructured IBR-RING2 linker. (B) Structural representation of full-length Parkin (PDB 4K95) highlighting the complex domain interactions in the three-dimensional structure, the catalytic C431 residue, and residue W403 within the REP, which plays a role in stabilizing the autoinhibited form of Parkin. (C) A model of Parkin with the E2 UbcH5B/Ube2D2 bound (devised using PDB 4K95 and PDB 4AP4 to mimic the position of an E2 bound to RING1) to illustrate the required displacement of UbLD and REP and the large distance between the E2∼Ub attachment site of the E2 and the catalytic active site of Parkin. Note that in this conformation the catalytic Cys within RING2 (C431) remains buried by RING0.RING1 is the only bona fide RING domain. All NMR and crystal structures of IBR domains from Parkin, HHARI and HOIP (PDB ID: 2CT7) are in good agreement. The Parkin and HHARI RING2s are structurally highly homologous and share a common Zn-coordinating arrangement with IBR domains. In contrast to the IBR and RING2, RING0 has a distinct arrangement of Zn-coordinating residues (Beasley et al, 2007; Duda et al, 2013; Riley et al, 2013; Spratt et al, 2013; Trempe et al, 2013; Wauer and Komander, 2013) (see Figure 1F of Trempe et al (2013) for the various Zn coordination arrangements).All of the Parkin crystal structures represent inactive forms of the E3. This is imposed by the quaternary positioning of the domains, which precludes activity in multiple ways. RING0 plays two obvious roles to maintain Parkin in an inactive state. RING0 shares an interface with RING2 and buries C431, making it unavailable as an ubiquitin acceptor. Moreover, RING0 intervenes between RING1 and RING2, creating an insurmountable separation of >50 Å between the active site Cys of an E2 bound to RING1 and C431 (Figure 1B and C). Thus, RING0 must be displaced for ubiquitin transfer to occur. Accordingly, deletion of RING0 results in a marked increase in Parkin autoubiquitination and in C431 reactivity (Riley et al, 2013; Trempe et al, 2013; Wauer and Komander, 2013). In HHARI, these two inhibitory functions are fulfilled by the C-terminal Ariadne domain, which similarly interposes between RING1 and RING2 (Duda et al, 2013).Additional inhibition is provided by the REP, which binds to RING1 at the canonical RING-E2 binding site and prevents E2 binding. This provides at least a partial explanation for the impaired ability of Parkin to bind E2 when compared to HHARI, which lacks this element (Duda et al, 2013). A disease-associated REP mutant (A398T) at the RING1 interface increases autoubiquitination (Wauer and Komander, 2013). The significance of inhibition by REP-RING1 binding was verified by mutating a critical RING1-interacting REP residue (W403A). This increased autoubiquitination and E2 binding (Trempe et al, 2013). Consistent with the requirement for charging C431 with ubiquitin in mitochondrial translocation (Lazarou et al, 2013), Parkin association with depolarized mitochondria is accelerated with this mutation (Trempe et al, 2013). Interestingly, W403 also interacts with the C-terminal Val of Parkin within RING2, and could therefore potentially further stabilize the autoinhibited form of the protein (Riley et al, 2013), consistent with previous observations (Henn et al, 2005).The quaternary structure of full-length Parkin also suggests that displacement of its N-terminal UbLD must occur for full activation (Trempe et al, 2013). The positioning of the UbLD adjacent to RING1 indicates that it would provide a steric impediment to E2∼Ub binding (Figure 1B and C). Additionally, displacement of the UbLD could be important to relieve interactions with the IBR-RING2 linker, which, as suggested in a previous study (Chaugule et al, 2011), might help to maintain Parkin in an inactive state. Finally, the crystal structure of the full-length Parkin indicates that the UbLD is not available for interactions with other proteins. This would limit Parkin''s range of intermolecular interactions.RBR E3s have at least two domains critical for sequential ubiquitin transfer and full activity, RING1 and RING2. The RING1 of Parkin, as well as all other RBR E3s, is notable in lacking the basic residue in the second Zn coordinating loop (or its equivalent in U-box proteins), which has recently been implicated in RING-mediated transfer of Ub from E2∼Ub (Metzger et al, 2013). This suggests that other factors play compensatory roles in positioning ubiquitin for transfer from E2∼Ub to C431. A non-mutually exclusive possibility is that the lack of this basic residue in RING1 limits unwanted attack on the E2∼Ub linkage, thereby minimizing the unregulated ubiquitination. Turning to RING2, the area surrounding the active site C431 of Parkin is notable in that it includes a sequence recognizable as a catalytic triad, similar to that in deubiquitinating enzymes. The Cys-His-Glu grouping, found in Parkin and other RBR E3s, contributes to in vitro activity (Riley et al, 2013; Wauer and Komander, 2013). Interestingly, however, the Glu was dispensable in a cellular assay (Riley et al, 2013). This triad is conserved in HHARI, where an Asn between the Cys and His residues (found in a number of RBRs but not conserved in Parkin), was found to be important for catalysis (Duda et al, 2013).The advances made in these studies impart significant information about an important and clinically relevant E3. However, Parkin, as well as HHARI, has been captured in their inactive, unmodified forms. One obvious question is how does Parkin transition between inactive and active states. PINK1 is implicated in phosphorylating Parkin on its UbLD and potentially other sites, with evidence that phosphorylation contributes to Parkin activation (Narendra et al, 2012). How phosphorylation could contribute to protein interactions that might facilitate Parkin activation, potentially including Parkin oligomerization (Lazarou et al, 2013), is unknown. Regardless, it is evident that considerable unwinding of its quaternary structure must take place.While there is much work ahead to understand these processes, one important interface that must be disrupted for activation is that between the REP and RING1. It is intriguing to consider that such interruption might be associated with other alterations in the IBR-RING2 linker, potentially facilitating the movement of the UbLD from RING1 and contributing to activation. Related to activation is the all-important question of how Parkin recognizes and targets specific substrates. While the UbLD represents a potential site of interaction, most purported substrates are not known to have UbLD-interaction domains. Although interactions involving the UbLD could occur indirectly, through bridging molecules, there is also evidence that other regions of Parkin, including the RBR region, might recognize substrates either directly or indirectly (Tsai et al, 2003) and that some substrates may be phosphorylated by PINK1 (Narendra et al, 2012). Conformational changes induced by substrate interactions, particularly in the IBR RING2 linker, could, as above, represent an important aspect of activation.There are over 75 missense mutations of Parkin associated with AR-JP, most of these inactivate the protein, but there are also some that are activating (Wauer and Komander, 2013). Activating mutations presumably result in pathology at least partially as a consequence of increased autoubiquitination and degradation (e.g., A398T). The current studies help to provide a classification of missense mutations into those that affect (i) folding or stability, (ii) catalytic mechanism, and (iii) interactions between domains. Interdomain mutations might inactivate or contribute to constitutive activation leading to autoubiquitination and degradation.Finally, we know little about how the autosomal recessive and the much more prevalent sporadic forms of PD overlap in their molecular pathology. However, mitochondrial dysfunction is increasingly a common theme. Thus, with the structure of the inactive protein in hand, there is hope that we can begin to consider ways in which domain interactions might be altered in a controlled manner to activate, but not hyperactivate, this critical E3 and lessen the progression of PD.     

Chaperoning the synapse—NMNAT protects Bruchpilot from crashing

Maintaining active zone structure is crucial for synaptic function. In this issue of EMBO reports, NMNAT is shown to act as a chaperone that protects the active zone structural protein Bruchpilot from degradation.EMBO reports (2013) 14 1, 87–94 doi:10.1038/embor.2012.181Synapses perform several tasks independently from the cell body of the neuron, including synaptic vesicle recycling through endocytosis or local protein maturation and degradation. Failure to regulate protein function locally is detrimental to the nervous system as evidenced by neuronal dysfunctions that arise as a consequence of synaptic ageing. This relative synaptic autonomy comes with a need for mechanisms that ensure correct protein (re)folding, and there is accumulating evidence that key chap-erones have a central role in the regulation and maintenance of synaptic structural integrity and function [1]. Work by Grace Zhai''s group, published in this issue of EMBO reports, demonstrates a key role of the Drosophila nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (NMNAT) chaperone in the protection of active zone components against activity-induced degeneration (Fig 1; [2]).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Results reported by Zang and colleagues [2] reveal a specific role of nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (NMNAT) in preserving active zone structure against use-dependent decline. This protection is exerted by direct interaction with BRP and protection of this key structural protein against ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. BRP, Bruchpilot; Ub, ubiquitin.Active zones, the specialized sites for neurotransmitter release at presynaptic terminals, are characterized by a dense protein network called the cytomatrix at the active zone (CAZ). The protein machinery of the CAZ is responsible for efficient synaptic vesicle tethering, docking and fusion with the presynaptic membrane and, thus, for reliable signal transmission from the neuron to the postsynaptic cell. Clearly, proteins in the CAZ are tightly regulated, especially in response to external cues such as synaptic activity [3,4]. Yet, this particularly crowded protein environment might be favourable for the formation of non-functional—and sometimes toxic—protein aggregates. Chaperones that act at the synapse reduce the probability of crucial protein aggregation by preventing and reverting these inappropriate interactions, which happen as a result of environmental stress.One of these chaperones, the Drosophila neuroprotective NMNAT, was identified in a genetic screen for factors involved in synapse function [5]. Its chaperone activity was later confirmed by using in vitro and in vivo protein folding assays [6]. NMNAT null mutants show severe and early onset neurodegeneration, whereas neurodevelopment does not seem to be strongly affected. Interestingly, degeneration of photoreceptors lacking NMNAT can be significantly attenuated by limiting synaptic activity, either by rearing flies in the dark or by introducing the no receptor potential A (norpA) mutation that blocks phototransduction [5]. These results indicate that NMNAT protects adult neurons from activity-induced degeneration.In this issue of EMBO reports, Zang and colleagues report a role for NMNAT at the synapse. They observed that loss or reduced levels of NMNAT leads to a concomitant loss of several synaptic markers including cysteine-string protein (CSP), synaptotagmin and the active zone structural protein Bruchpilot (BRP). Remarkably, BRP was the only one of these proteins found to co-immunoprecipitate with NMNAT from brain lysates. Both proteins show approximately 50% co-localization at the neuromuscular junction when imaged by 3D-SIM^™ super-resolution microscopy, suggesting that NMNAT might act directly as a chaperone for maintaining a functional BRP conformation.Consistent with a protective role of NMNAT against BRP degradation, RNA interference-mediated NMNAT knockdown leads to BRP ubiquitination, whereas this modification was not detected in control brain lysates. Given the involvement of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway in regulating synaptic development and function [1], the authors tested the effect of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 on BRP ubiquitination. They observed an increased level of BRP ubiquitination in wild-type flies fed with this drug, suggesting a role for the proteasome in the clearance of ubiquitinated BRP. By contrast, overexpression of NMNAT reduces the level of BRP ubiquitination both in the absence and the presence of MG-132, providing further evidence for the protective role of this chaperone against ubiquitination of BRP (Fig 1).a key role of the […] nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase (NMNAT) chaperone in the protection of active zone components against activity-induced degenerationBRP is a cytoskeletal-like protein that is an integral component of T-bars—electron-dense structures that project from the presynaptic membrane and around which synaptic vesicles cluster. In agreement with a protective role of NMNAT against BRP ubiquitination, reduced levels of this chaperone give rise to a marked decrease in T-bar size in an age-dependent manner (Fig 1). Active zones are known to show dynamic changes in response to synaptic activity, and NMNAT was previously reported to protect photoreceptors against activity-induced degeneration [5]. The authors thus tested the effect of minimizing photoreceptor activity on active zone structure by keeping flies in the dark or inhibiting phototransduction by means of the norpA mutation. Both manipulations largely reversed the effect of NMNAT knockdown on T-bar size. Absence of light exposure also significantly reduced the amount of BRP that co-immunoprecipitates with NMNAT, indicating that neuronal activity regulates NMNAT–BRP interaction. Further experiments are needed to examine whether there is a positive correlation between synaptic activity and BRP ubiquitination levels, and whether NMNAT can indeed keep T-bar structure intact by protecting BRP against this modification under conditions of high synaptic activity.Finally, the study shows that reduced NMNAT levels not only caused a loss of BRP from the synapse but also a specific mislocalization of this protein to the cell body, where it accumulates in clusters together with the remaining NMNAT protein. Under these conditions BRP co-immunoprecipitated with the stress-induced Hsp70, a chaperone classically used as a marker for protein aggregation. It is still unclear whether these BRP clusters form as a result of defective anterograde trafficking and/or of enhanced retrograde transport of BRP. In the absence of light stimulation T-bars are properly assembled in nmnat null photoreceptors, but at this stage a role of NMNAT in regulating the axonal transport of BRP under conditions of normal synaptic activity cannot be excluded. Noticeably, two independent recent reports show involvement of NMNAT in mitochondrial mobility [7,8].As BRP and NMNAT co-localize and interact with one another, the simplest model that accounts for all the observations by Zang et al is that NMNAT directly prevents activity-induced ubiquitination of BRP and subsequent degradation. Yet, as its name indicates, this chaperone is an essential enzyme in NAD synthesis. It was previously shown by the Bellen lab that mutant versions of NMNAT, impaired for NAD production, rescue photoreceptor degeneration caused by loss of NMNAT [5]. This strongly suggests that NAD production is not required for stabilization of BRP but this might need further scrutiny [9].…reduced levels of this chaperone [NMNAT] give rise to a marked decrease in T-bar sizeWhile providing further insights into the role of NMNAT at the active zone in Drosophila, the paper by Zang et al might also have important implications for neurodegeneration in mammals. When ectopically expressed in mice, Nmnat has a protective role against Wallerian degeneration, that is, synapse and axon degeneration that rapidly occurs distal from an axonal wound in wild-type animals. This process is significantly delayed in mice overexpressing a chimaeric protein consisting of the amino-terminal 70 residues of the ubiquitination factor E4B (Ube4b) fused through a linker to Nmnat1, known as the Wallerian degeneration slow (Wld^s) protein. Conversely, mutations in the human NMNAT1 gene were characterized in several families with Leber congenital amaurosis—a severe, early-onset neurodegenerative disease of the retina [10,11,12,13]. As Wld^s or Nmnat1 overexpression protects axons from degeneration in various disease models [9], Nmnat1 emerges as a promising candidate for developing protective strategies against axonal degeneration in peripheral neuropathies such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis but also in glaucoma, AIDS and other diseases [9].