Close synchrony of ovulation in superstimulated heifers that have a downregulated anterior pituitary gland and are induced to ovulate with exogenous LH

The synchrony of ovulation was examined in superstimulated heifers that had a downregulated pituitary gland and which were induced to ovulate by injection of exogenous LH. The pituitary was downregulated and desensitized to GnRH by treatment with the GnRH agonist deslorelin. Nulliparous heifers (3.5 yr old) at random stages of the estrous cycle were assigned to 1 of 3 groups, and on Day -7 received the following treatments: Group 1 (control, n = 8), 1 norgestomet ear implant; Group 2 (GnRH agonist, n = 8); Group 3 (GnRH agonist-LH protocol, n = 8), 2 deslorelin ear implants. Ovarian follicle growth in all heifers was superstimulated with twice-daily intramuscular injections of FSH (Folltropin-V): Day O, 40 mg (80 mg total dose); Day 1, 30 mg; Day 2; 20 mg; Day 3, 10 mg. On Day 2, all heifers were given a luteolytic dose of PGF (7 A.M.), Norgestomet implants were removed from heifers in Group 1 (6 P.M.). Heifers in Group 3 were given an injection of 25 mg, i.m. porcine LH (Lutropin) on Day 4 (4 P.M.). Ovarian follicle status was monitored at 8-h intervals from Day 3 (8 A.M.) to Day 6 (4 P.M.) using an Aloka Echo Camera and 7.5 MHz transducer. Heifers in Groups 2 and 3 exhibited estrus earlier (P < 0.05) than heifers in Group 1. Heifers in Group 2 did not have a preovulatory LH surge and they did not ovulate. Individual control heifers in Group 1 ovulated between 12 A.M. on Day 5 and 8 A.M. on Day 6. Heifers with deslorelin implants and injected with LH in Group 3 ovulated between 4 P.M. on Day 5 and 8 A.M. on Day 6. It was confirmed that superstimulated heifers with GnRH agonist implants can be induced to ovulate with LH. It was also demonstrated that ovulation is closely synchronized after injection of LH. Thus, a single, fixed-time insemination schedule could be used in a GnRH agonist-LH superovulation protocol, with significant practical and economic advantages for superovulation and embryo transfer programs.     

Leptin prevents fasting-mediated reductions in pulsatile secretion of luteinizing hormone and enhances its gonadotropin-releasing hormone-mediated release in heifers

We tested the hypothesis that leptin could prevent fasting-mediated reductions in pulsatile secretion and modify GnRH-mediated release of LH in heifers approaching puberty. Thirteen crossbred, prepubertal heifers (13.5-16 mo; 280-350 kg) exhibiting frequencies of pulses of LH between 0.67 and 1 pulse/h, were assigned randomly to two groups: 1). control (n = 6), fasted for 72 h with s.c. injections of saline at 12-h intervals, and 2). leptin (n = 7), fasted for 72 h with s.c. injections of oleptin (19.2 microg/kg) at 12-h intervals. Blood samples were collected intensively for 6 h on Days 0 and 3. This was followed on Day 3 with sequential administration of physiological (0.0011 microg/kg, i.v.) and pharmacological (0.22 microg/kg, i.v.) doses of GnRH and additional blood sampling. Leptin treatment increased (P = 0.0003) plasma concentrations of leptin 5-6-fold compared to controls. Fasting caused a marked decline (P = 0.01) between Days 0 and 3 in the frequency of LH pulses in controls; however, this effect was prevented in the leptin group, with pulse frequency increasing (P < 0.008) from Day 0 to 3. Leptin treatment increased GnRH-induced release of LH at both low (P = 0.04) and high (P = 0.02) doses. Plasma insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 were reduced by fasting and unaffected by leptin. Leptin increased mean concentrations of growth hormone. Results indicate, for the first time, that exogenous leptin can prevent fasting-mediated reductions in the frequency of LH pulses and modify GnRH-mediated release of LH in intact, prepubertal heifers.     

Influence of repeated low doses of gonadotrop in releasing hormone on postpartum interval and serum luteinizing hormone in Brahman cross cows

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of repeated low-dose injections of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) 30 to 40 d post partum on reproductive characteristics in multiparous suckled Brahman cross cows. In Experiment I, 39 cows were injected (i.v.) with GnRH (5 mug/injection) at 2-h intervals for either 0 (control), 6, 12, or 24 h at 30 to 37 d post partum. GnRH injections for short periods (6h) increased the number of cows exibiting estrus within 45 d of treatment, but cows injected for 24 h failed to exhibit estrus during this period. The period from treatment to first estrus was shorter in the 6-h GnRH group compared to the control group. Injections for 6h significantly (P < 0.05) increased in serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations 1 d after GnRH treatment. In Experiment II we examined the effect of i.v. GnRH injections (5 mug/injection at 2-h intervals) for 6h in a larger group of cows (n = 70). The days from treatment to first estrus were reduced (P < 0.05) in GnRH-treated cows; however, first-service conception rates were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in treated compared to control cows (46.4 and 80.0%, respectively). The results led us to believe that GnRH injections for short periods reduce postpartum interval to first estrus, but fertility at first estrus is lowered.     

Regulatory roles of leptin at the hypothalamic-hypophyseal axis before and after sexual maturation in cattle

Studies assessed, either directly or indirectly, the role of GnRH in leptin-mediated stimulation of LH release in cattle before and after sexual maturation. In experiment 1, the objectives were to determine whether leptin could acutely accelerate the frequency of LH pulses, and putatively GnRH pulses, in prepubertal heifers at different stages of development. In experiment 2, we determined directly whether acute, leptin-mediated increases in LH secretion in the fasted, mature female are accompanied by an increase in GnRH secretion. Ten-month-old prepubertal heifers (experiment 1) fed normal- (n = 5) and restricted-growth (n = 5) diets received three injections of saline or recombinant ovine leptin (oleptin; 0.2 microg/kg body weight, i.v.) at hourly intervals during 5-h experiments conducted every 5 wk until all normal-growth heifers were pubertal. Leptin increased mean concentrations of circulating LH regardless of diet, but pulse characteristics were not altered at any age. In experiment 2, ovariectomized, estradiol-implanted cows (n = 5) were fasted twice for 72 h and treated with either saline or oleptin i.v. (as in experiment 1) on Day 3 of each fast. Leptin increased plasma concentrations of LH and third ventricle cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of GnRH, and increased the amplitude of LH and the size of GnRH pulses, respectively, on Day 3 of fasting compared to saline. Overall, results indicate that leptin is unable to accelerate the pulse generator in heifers at any developmental stage. However, leptin-mediated augmentation of LH concentrations and pulse amplitude in the nutritionally stressed, mature female are associated with modifications in GnRH secretory dynamics.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone at estrus: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during the periestrual and postinsemination periods in dairy cattle

Administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) improved conception rates in our previous studies. Our objective was to determine if the effect of GnRH was mediated through serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and/or by altered secretion of serum progesterone (P) and estradiol-17 beta (E) during the periestrual and post-insemination periods. Cattle were given either GnRH (n = 54) or saline (n = 55) at 72 h and inseminated artificially (AI) 80 h after the second of two injections of either prostaglandin F2 alpha or its analog, cloprostenol. Progesterone and E were measured in blood serum collected during 3 wk after AI (estrus) from 60 females. Blood was collected for LH determinations via indwelling jugular cannulae from 14 cows and 11 heifers. Collections were taken every 4 h from 32 to 108 h after the second PGF injection (PGF-2) (periestrual period) and at more frequent intervals during 240 min after administration of GnRH (n = 18) or saline (n = 7). Ten females had a spontaneous preovulatory LH surge before GnRH treatment (GnRH-spontaneous), whereas GnRH induced the preovulatory LH surge in six females. A spontaneous LH surge appeared to be initiated in two heifers at or near the time of GnRH treatment (spontaneous and/or induced). The remaining seven cows had spontaneous LH surges with no subsequent change in LH after saline treatment. Serum P during the 21 days after estrus was lower (p less than 0.05) in both pregnant and nonpregnant (open) cattle treated previously with GnRH compared with saline. Serum P during the first week after estrus was greater (p less than 0.01) and increased (p less than 0.05) more rapidly in saline controls and in GnRH-spontaneous cattle than in those exhibiting GnRH-induced or GnRH-spontaneous and/or-induced surges of LH. Conception rate of cattle receiving GnRH was higher (p = 0.06) than that of saline-treated controls. These data suggest that GnRH treatment at insemination initiated the preovulatory LH surge in some cattle, but serum P in both pregnant and open cows was compromised during the luteal phase after GnRH treatment. Improved fertility may be associated with delayed or slowly rising concentrations of serum progesterone after ovulation.     

Induction of estrus with intramuscular injections of GnRH or PMSG in lactating goats (Capra hircus ) primed with a progestagen during seasonal anestrus

In Experiment 1, goats in seasonal anestrus (n=154) were treated with sponges impregnated with 1 of 2 types of progestagen (MAP or FGA) followed by PMSG (400 IU im) 48 h before sponge removal. The type of progestagen used had no effect on kidding, abortion, pseudogestation, multiple births, stillbirths, number of live births per doe or gestation length. In Experiment 2, lactating goats (n=24) in seasonal anestrus were treated with progestagen sponges (MAP). At sponge removal they received one of the following treatments: 1 injection of PMSG (400 IU im), 1 injection of GnRH (125 mug im; GnRH-1), or 2 injections of GnRH (125 mug/injection im; GnRH-2) at a 48 h interval. Serum samples were taken at 6-h intervals for 96 h, starting 12 h after sponge removal. Heterologous radioimmunoassays were validated for the measurements of goat FSH, LH, E(2) and P(4). The onset of estrus (P=0.004), mean doe receptivity (P=0.0006), maximum preovulatory E(2) concentrations (P=0.0001) and LH peak concentrations (P=0.08) occurred significantly later for GnRH-1 and GnRH-2 than for PMSG treatment. The PMSG treatment induced a preovulatory LH peak in a greater number of goats (P=0.05) and gave a higher gestation rate than GnRH-1 and GnRH-2 treatments (57 vs 0 vs 12%; P=0.03). It is likely that the GnRH treatments administered did not reactivate the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. Thus, intramuscular injections of GnRH in lactating goats primed with a progestagen were not as effective in regulating reproductive performance during seasonal anestrus as were injections of PMSG.     

Evaluation of the incorporation of GnRH into a superovulatory regimen for Zebu cattle

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utilization of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) as part of a superovulatory regimen for Zebu cattle. Forty Zebu cows were superovulated with 40 mg of follicle stimulating hormone-pituitary (FSH-P) divided in eight fractions of 5 mg injected at 12-h intervals. Luteolysis was induced with 15 mg of luprostiol injected at 48 h after the first injection of FSH-P. Half of the animals were injected with 200 ug of GnRH 3 h after the onset of standing estrus. The other 20 animals were not injected with GnRH. All the cows were inseminated three times at 12-h intervals, starting at the time of standing estrus. Embryos were recovered nonsurgically 7 d after the last insemination. Palpation per rectum performed immediately after collection of the embryos did not show differences in the number of corpora lutea between groups (P > 0.05). Likewise, there were no significant differences between treatments with respect to the total number of embryos plus ova, total number of embryos, or the number of transferable embryos recovered (P>0.05). The number of blastocysts, morulae, degenerated morulae and unfertilized ova was similar for the two groups. It is concluded that the incorporation of GnRH into a part of the superovulatory treatment for Zebu cattle does not improve the results of such treatment.     

Differential requirement for pulsatile LH during the follicular phase and exposure to the preovulatory LH surge for oocyte fertilization and embryo development in cattle

The requirement for pulsatile LH and the LH surge for the acquisition of oocyte fertilizing potential and embryo developmental competency was examined in Zebu heifers. Follicular growth was superstimulated using the GnRH agonist-LH protocol in which pulsatile LH and the preovulatory LH surge are blocked. In experiment 1, heifers were assigned on Day 7 of the estrous cycle to receive: group 1A (n = 5), 1.5 mg norgestomet (NOR) implant; group 1B (n = 5), GnRH agonist implant. Follicular growth was superstimulated with 2x daily injections of FSH from Day 10 (a.m.) to Day 13 (p.m.), with PGF2alpha injection on Day 12 (a.m.). Heifers were ovariectomized on Day 15 (a.m.) and oocytes were placed immediately into fertilization, without 24 h maturation. Respective cleavage and blastocyst development rates were: group 1A, 0/64 oocytes (0%) and 0/64 (0%); group 1B, 34/70 oocytes (48.6%) and 2/70 (2.9%). In experiment 2, heifers were assigned on Day 7 of the estrous cycle to receive: group 2A (n = 10), 1.5 mg NOR implant; group 2B (n = 10), GnRH agonist implant; group 2C (n = 10), GnRH agonist implant. Follicular growth was superstimulated as in experiment 1 above. Heifers in groups 2A and 2B received an injection of 25 mg LH on Day 14 (p.m.) and all heifers were ovariectomized on Day 15 (a.m.); oocytes were placed immediately into fertilization without 24 h maturation. Cleavage rates were similar for heifers in group 2A (84/175 oocytes, 48.0%), group 2B (61/112 oocytes, 54.5%) and group 2C (69/163, 42.3%). Blastocyst development rates were similar for heifers in group 2A (22/175 oocytes, 12.6%) and group 2B (25/112 oocytes, 22.3%) and lower (P < 0.05) for heifers in group 2C (9/163 oocytes, 5.5%). Oocytes obtained from heifers treated with GnRH agonist, without injection of exogenous LH, underwent cleavage indicating that neither pulsatile LH nor the preovulatory LH surge are obligatory for nuclear maturation in cattle oocytes. Exposure to a surge-like increase in plasma LH increased embryo developmental competency indicating that the preovulatory LH surge promotes cytoplasmic maturation. The findings have important implications for controlling the in vivo maturation of oocytes before in vitro procedures including nuclear transfer.     

Effect of timing of prostaglandin PGF 2 alpha injection subsequent to embryo collection on the resumption of normal follicular development following superovulatory treatment in cattle

Nonlactating Holstein and Jersey cows (n = 24) were superovulated and ovarian follicular development was monitored by transrectal ultrasound during the period after embryo recovery. Luteolysis was induced by two injections of prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF; 25 mg Lutalyse; 12-h interval) at specific times after superovulatory induced estrus (Treatment 1, Day 9; Treatment 2, Day 12; Treatment 3, Day 17; Treatment 4, Day 25; superovulatory estrus = Day 0 of Cycle 1). Follicular development was monitored during Cycle 1 before and after PGF injection and continued through the ensuing estrous cycle (Cycle 2). Superovulation led to more than one embryo collected in 14 cows (mean = 8.71 embryos: positive superovulatory response [PSR] cows), while 10 cows were not successfully superovulated (mean = 0.1 embryo; negative superovulatory response [NSR] cows). These cows differed in terms of number of unovulated follicles detected at embryo collection (4.21 vs 17.2, PSR vs NSR) and plasma progesterone during the superovulatory estrous cycle (32.3 ng/ml PSR vs 8.6 ng/ml NSR). Follicular development during Cycle 1 started sooner in NSR than in PSR cows (day by class by response P<0.03) and was initiated on Days 11 to 12 in NSR cows and on Days 19 to 20 in PSR cows. Interval to estrus after PGF averaged 6.3 d. Cows having short intervals to estrus had follicles at the time of PGF injection. Treatment influenced the length of Cycle 1, but it did not affect the interval to estrus after PGF, the length of Cycle 2, or follicular development during Cycle 2. The results indicate that 1) the timing of PGF injection after embryo collection does not influence subsequent follicular populations, 2) elongated estrous cycles and intervals to estrus after PGF in superovulated cattle are a function of decreased follicular activity, and 3) the presence of numerous corpora lutea and not the superovulatory treatment, per se, seem to attenuate follicular growth.     

Reversible,long-term inhibition of ovulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus)

The effects of weekly injections of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (GnRHa) ([N-acetyl-DβNal1-D-pCl-Phe2-D-Phe3-D-Arg6-Phe7-Arg8D-Ala10] NH2 GnRH) on pituitary and ovarian function were examined in the marmoset monkey, Callithrix jacchus. In experiment 1, five cyclic females were given weekly injections of vehicle (50% propylene glycol in saline) for 6 weeks followed by GnRHa for 20 weeks, animals receiving either 200 μg GnRHa/injection (n = 2) or 67 μg GnRHa/injection (n = 3) for 10 weeks, after which the treatment was reversed. Bioactive luteinizing hormone (LH) and progesterone (Po) were measured in blood samples (0.2–0.4 ml) collected twice weekly until at least 8 weeks after the last GnRHa injection. GnRHa treatment, timed to begin in the midluteal phase, caused a rapid decline in LH and Po and luteal regression after a single injection (both doses). Po levels were consistently low (<10 ng/ml), and ovulation was inhibited throughout 200 μg treatment in all animals. Short periods of elevated Po (>10 ng/ml) were, however, occasionally seen during 67 μg treatment, indicating incomplete ovarian suppression. Mean LH levels were significantly lower during GnRHa treatment compared with the period of vehicle injection (all animals 200 μg; three animals 67 μg), and there were significant differences in LH levels between GnRHa treatments (200 μg vs. 67 μg) in four animals. Four animals resumed normal ovarian cycles after the end of GnRHa treatment (15/16 days, three animals; 59 days, one animal); the fifth animal died of unknown causes 32 days after the last GnRHa injection. In a second experiment, pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH was tested 1 day after a single injection of vehicle or antagonist (200 or 67 μg). Measurement of bioactive LH indicated that pituitary response to 200 ng native GnRH was significantly suppressed in animals receiving the antagonist, the degree of suppression being dose related. A third experiment examined the effect of four weekly injections of 200 μg GnRHa on follicular size and granulosa cell responsiveness to human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH) in vitro. Follicular development beyond 1 mm was inhibited by GnRHa treatment (preovulatory follicles normally 2-4 mm) although granulosa cell responsiveness to FSH during 48 hr of culture was not impaired. These results suggest that the GnRHa-induced suppression of follicular development and ovulation was mediated primarily by an inhibition of pituitary gonadotropin secretion and not by a direct action at the level of the ovary.     

Naloxone evokes large-amplitude GnRH pulses in luteal-phase ewes

Ewes were sampled during the mid-late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle. Hypophysial portal and jugular venous blood samples were collected at 5-10 min intervals for a minimum of 3 h, before i.v. infusions of saline (12 ml/h; N = 6) or naloxone (40 mg/h; N = 6) for 2 h. During the 2-h saline infusion 2/6 sheep exhibited a GnRH/LH pulse; 3/6 saline infused ewes did not show a pulse during the 6-8-h portal blood sampling period. In contrast, large amplitude GnRH/LH pulses were observed during naloxone treatment in 5/6 ewes. The mean (+/- s.e.m.) amplitude of the LH secretory episodes during the naloxone infusion (1.07 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that before the infusion in the same sheep (0.54 +/- 0.15 ng/ml). Naloxone significantly (P less than 0.005) increased the mean GnRH pulse amplitude in the 5/6 responding ewes from a pre-infusion value of 0.99 +/- 0.22 pg/min to 4.39 +/- 1.10 pg/min during infusion. This episodic GnRH secretory rate during naloxone treatment was also significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than in the saline-infused sheep (1.53 +/- 0.28 pg/min). Plasma FSH and prolactin concentrations did not change in response to the opiate antagonist. Perturbation of the endogenous opioid peptide system in the ewe by naloxone therefore increases the secretion of hypothalamic GnRH into the hypophysial portal vasculature. The response is characterized by a large-amplitude GnRH pulse which, in turn, causes a large-amplitude pulse of LH to be released by the pituitary gland.     

Pituitary response to repeated copulation and/or gonadotropin-releasing hormone administration in llamas and alpacas.

The response of the pituitary gland and ovary to repeated copulatory periods and/or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, i.v. 1000 micrograms) administration was determined in llamas and alpacas. Eighty adult females (41 llamas and 39 alpacas with ovulatory follicles) were divided into three general groups for each species as follows: copulation (one or two copulations at either 6- or 24-h intervals) GnRH treatment (one or two treatments at either 6- or 24-h intervals), and combined treatment (copulation followed by GnRH treatment, or GnRH followed by copulation at either 6- or 24-h intervals). An additional control (nontreated) group was composed of 4 llamas and 4 alpacas. The first copulation or treatment with GnRH provoked LH release sufficient to cause ovulation in most of the females (alpacas, 89%; llamas, 92%); urinary pregnanediol glucuronide values, used to verify ovulation, were significantly elevated 48 h after copulation and/or GnRH treatment. A second stimulus, copulation or GnRH, provoked no LH response with concentrations similar to those in nontreated controls and in females not ovulating. Llamas and alpacas thus were refractory to a second copulatory or GnRH stimulus with regard to LH release for up to 24 h following an initial ovulatory release of LH.     

Effect of dexamethasone on secretion of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in the boar

Eight adult, Yorkshire-Landrace crossbred boars were used to evaluate the effects of the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone (DXM) on the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone. Four treatments of 4 d each were administered: 1) 2 ml i.m. of 0.9% (w/v) NaCl solution (control); 2) DXM (2 ml i.m. as a dose of 50 mug/kg body weight, every 12 h); 3) DXM plus gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH; 50 mug in 1 ml i.m. every 6 h); 4) 2 ml NaCl solution i.m. plus a single dose of 50 mug i.v. GnRH. Blood samples were collected twice daily from an indwelling jugular vein catheter for 3 d and at 15 min intervals for 12 h on the fourth day. DXM treatment resulted in lower (P M0.01) testosterone values in samples collected twice daily. More frequent sampling on Day 4 revealed that DXM reduced (P<0.01) the number of pulsatile increases of LH in plasma, although the individual mean pulse areas did not fiffer between the NaCl- and DXM-treated groups. This was associated with a decreased pulse frequency of testosterone (P<0.05). GnRH plus DXM treatment caused a significant elevation (P<0.05) in mean values as well as in the mean pulse area and in the total of the individual pulse areas of LH. Pulse area and mean concentrations of testosterone were also increased (P<0.01) when GnRH was given concurrently with DXM. Comparison of a single injection of GnRH when NaCl was being administered (Treatment 4) to one of the injections of GnRH (Day 4, 0800 h, Treatment 3) revealed a subsequently greater (P<0.01) pulse area in LH above base-line during DXM treatment (7.67 +/- 1.17 ng/ml) than during the NaCl (4.17 +/- 0.73 ng/ml) treatment period. This was reflected in a greater (P<0.01) pulse increase of testosterone following the LH pulse in boars treated with DXM. It is concluded that DXM treatment in the boar can reduce the pulse frequency of LH secretion, presumably by affecting GnRH secretion, but it has less effect directly on pituitary LH synthesis and release.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion during the postpartum anestrous period of the ewe

An increase in episodic release of LH is putatively the initial event leading to the onset of postpartum ovarian cyclicity in ewes. This experiment was conducted to determine the relationship between hypothalamic release of GnRH and onset of pulsatile secretion of LH during postpartum anestrus. Control ewes (n = 7) were monitored during the postpartum period to determine when normal estrous cycles resumed. In controls, the mean interval from parturition to the first postpartum estrus as indicated by a rise in serum progesterone greater than 1 ng/mg was 25.8 +/- 0.6 days. Additional ewes (n = 4-5) at 3, 7, 14, and 21 days postpartum (+/- 1 day) were surgically fitted with cannula for collection of hypophyseal-portal blood. Hypophyseal-portal and jugular blood samples were collected over a 6- to 7-h period at 10-min intervals. The number of GnRH pulses/6 h increased (p less than 0.05) from Day 3 postpartum (2.2 +/- 0.5) to Days 7 and 14 (3.6 +/- 0.2 and 3.9 +/- 0.4, respectively). A further increase (p less than 0.05) in GnRH pulse frequency was observed at Day 21 postpartum (6.4 +/- 0.4 pulses/6 h). Changes in pulsatile LH release paralleled changes observed in pulsatile GnRH release over Days 3, 7, 14, and 21 postpartum (0.83 +/- 0.3, 2.8 +/- 0.4, 2.9 +/- 0.6, and 4.0 +/- 1.1 pulses/6 h, respectively). GnRH pulse amplitude was higher at Day 21 than at Days 3, 7, or 14 postpartum. These findings suggest that an increase in the frequency of GnRH release promotes the onset of pulsatile LH release during postpartum anestrus in ewes.     

Effects of ageing and exogenous melatonin on pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in ewes during anestrus and the reproductive season

The study examined the effect of melatonin implants on in vivo pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in control, fully productive (5.7+/-0.4 years old, n=17) and aged (10.7+/-0.3 years old, n=14) ovariectomized, estradiol-treated Rasa Aragonesa ewes. On 27 February, eight ewes in each age group received a single implant containing 18 mg melatonin. On 10 April, blood samples to be assayed for LH were collected at 10-min intervals over 4h (starting at 09:00 and 22:00 h). After samples 6 and 18 were collected, ewes received a single i.v. injection of GnRH (20 ng/kg liveweight). The pituitary response to GnRH was assessed using the difference between plasma LH concentrations before and after (highest value) each injection (DLH1, DLH2)), and the area under the LH response curve for 1h after each GnRH injection (AUC1, AUC2). On 23 September, the previously implanted ewes received a new melatonin implant and, on 17 November, all of the ewes were subjected to the same diurnal and nocturnal sampling protocols, again. Generally, non-implanted aged ewes exhibited a lower pituitary response to GnRH than did non-implanted control ewes, particularly in November and after the first injection (P<0.05 for DLH1 and AUC1 in both the diurnal and nocturnal tests). The response was significantly affected by the interaction of age and melatonin treatment, particularly in the diurnal tests (P<0.1 for DLH1 and AUC1, and P<0.05 for AUC2 in April; P<0.05 for DLH1, AUC1 and AUC2 in November), which indicated that exogenous melatonin increased LH levels after GnRH injections in aged ewes compared to non-implanted ewes, this effect being the opposite in control females. Thus, melatonin can restore in ewes the functionality of the neuroendocrine system, after it has been reduced by senescence.     

Plasma LH and FSH responses and ovarian activity in prepubertal heifers treated with repeated injections of low doses of GnRH for 72 h

Twelve 5-month-old Hereford X Friesian heifers were injected i.v. with 2.0 micrograms GnRH at 2-h intervals for 72 h. Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals from 24 h before the start until 8 h after the end of the GnRH treatment period. Over the 24-h pretreatment period, mean LH concentrations ranged from 0.4 to 2.2 ng/ml and FSH concentrations from 14.1 to 157.4 ng/ml; LH episodes (2-6 episodes/24 h) were evident in all animals. Each injection of GnRH resulted in a distinct episode-like response in LH, but not FSH. Mean LH, but not FSH, concentrations were significantly increased by GnRH treatment. The GnRH-induced LH episodes were of greater magnitude than naturally-occurring episodes (mean maximum concentration 6.7 +/- 0.5 and 4.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml respectively). Preovulatory LH surges occurred between 17.0 and 58.8 h after the start of treatment in 9/12 heifers, with a coincident FSH surge in 8 of these animals. This was not followed by normal luteal function. There were no apparent correlations between pretreatment hormone concentrations, and either the pituitary response to GnRH or the occurrence of preovulatory gonadotrophin release.     

The frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion regulates expression of alpha and luteinizing hormone beta-subunit messenger ribonucleic acids in male rats

The influence of GnRH pulse frequency on LH subunit mRNA concentrations was examined in castrate, testosterone-replaced male rats. GnRH pulses (25 ng/pulse) or saline to controls, were given via a carotid cannula at intervals of 7.5-240 min for 48 h. alpha and LH beta mRNA concentrations were 109 +/- 23 and 30 +/- 5 pg cDNA bound/100 micrograms pituitary DNA, respectively, in saline controls. GnRH pulse intervals of 15, 30, and 60 min resulted in elevated alpha and LH beta mRNAs (P less than 0.01) and maximum responses (4-fold, alpha; 3-fold, LH beta) were seen after the 30-min pulses. Acute LH release to the last GnRH pulse was seen after the 15-, 30-, and 60-min pulse intervals. In contrast, LH subunit mRNAs were not increased and acute LH release was markedly impaired after the rapid (7.5 min) or slower (120 and 240 min) pulse intervals. Equalization of total GnRH dose/48 h using the 7.5- and 240-min intervals did not increase LH subunit mRNAs to levels produced by the optimal 30-min interval. These data indicate that the frequency of the pulsatile GnRH stimulus regulates expression of alpha and LH beta mRNAs in male rats. Further, GnRH pulse frequencies that increase subunit mRNA concentrations are associated with continuing LH responsiveness to GnRH.     

Synchronization of estrus and ovulation and associated endocrine changes in Bos indicus cows

The effects of 4 estrus synchronization treatments on intervals to and synchrony of estrus and ovulation, on timing of the preovulatory LH surge and associated changes in plasma progesterone, LH, FSH, and 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated in 48 Bos indicus cows. Treatment 1 consisted of 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) 14 d apart (n = 12); Treatment 2 of a subcutaneous 3-mg norgestomet implant and an intramuscular injection of 3 mg of norgestomet and 5 mg estradiol valerate, with the implant removed 10 d later (n = 12; norgestomet-estradiol); Treatment 3 of norgestomet-estradiol, with a subcutaneous injection of PMSG given at time of implant removal (Day 10; n = 12); and Treatment 4 of norgestomet implant (as for Treatments 2 and 3) inserted for 10 d, with an intramuscular injection of PGF(2alpha) given at the time of implant removal (n = 12). The experiment was conducted in 2 replicates (24 cows/replicate, 6 cows/group). Estrus, ovulation and timing of the preovulatory surge of LH varied less in cows treated with norgestomet-estradiol and PMSG than in cows in Treatments 1 and 4 (P < 0.008). Treatment with PMSG reduced variation in ovulation times and timing of the LH surge in cows treated with norgestomet-estradiol (P < 0.02). Concentrations of E(2) were higher in cows in Treatments 2 and 3 on the final day of treatment and at about 6 h post ovulation compared with cows in Treatments 1 and 4 (P < 0.05). Different methods for synchronizing estrus did not alter sequential endocrine and behavioral changes in relation to the timing of the LH peak, and the results were consistent with current recommendations for insemination times in Bos taurus cattle.     

Divergent responses of gonadotropin subunit messenger RNAs to continuous versus pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone in vitro

Episodic GnRH input is necessary for the maintenance of LH and FSH secretion. In the current study we have assessed the requirement of a pulsatile GnRH signal for the regulation of gonadotropin alpha- and beta-subunit gene expression. Using a dispersed rat pituitary perifusion system, GnRH (10 nM) was administered as a continuous infusion vs. hourly pulses. Secretion of free alpha-subunit, LH, and FSH were monitored over 5-min intervals for the entire 12-h treatment period before the responses of alpha, LH beta, and FSH beta mRNAs were assessed. Basal release of all three glycoproteins declined slowly over 6-8 h before reaching a plateau. The cells were responsive to each pulse of GnRH, but continuous GnRH elicited only a brief episode of free alpha-subunit, LH, and FSH release, followed by a return to unstimulated levels. Despite the similar patterns of secretion, differences were observed in the responses of gonadotropin mRNAs to the two modes of GnRH. alpha mRNA increased in response to continuous (1.6-fold) or pulsatile (1.7-fold) GnRH. FSH beta mRNA was suppressed to 48% of the control value after continuous GnRH, but was stimulated over 4-fold by the pulses. LH beta mRNA was unresponsive to either treatment paradigm. We conclude that in vitro 1) alpha mRNA levels are increased in response to GnRH independent of the mode of stimulation; 2) under the conditions studied, LH beta mRNA levels are unresponsive to either mode of GnRH input; and 3) the response of FSH beta mRNA to GnRH is highly dependent on the mode of administration, with levels depressed in response to continuous GnRH, but stimulated by pulsatile GnRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)