Xenopus Cds1 is regulated by DNA-dependent protein kinase and ATR during the cell cycle checkpoint response to double-stranded DNA ends

The checkpoint kinase Cds1 (Chk2) plays a key role in cell cycle checkpoint responses with functions in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and induction of apoptosis. Proper regulation of Cds1 is essential for appropriate cellular responses to checkpoint-inducing insults. While the kinase ATM has been shown to be important in the regulation of human Cds1 (hCds1), here we report that the kinases ATR and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) play more significant roles in the regulation of Xenopus Cds1 (XCds1). Under normal cell cycle conditions, nonactivated XCds1 constitutively associates with a Xenopus ATR complex. The association of XCds1 with this complex does not require a functional forkhead activation domain but does require a putative SH3 binding region that is found in XCds1. In response to double-stranded DNA ends, the amino terminus of XCds1 is rapidly phosphorylated in a sequential pattern. First DNA-PK phosphorylates serine 39, a site not previously recognized as important in Cds1 regulation. Xenopus ATM, ATR, and/or DNA-PK then phosphorylate three consensus serine/glutamine sites. Together, these phosphorylations have the dual function of inducing dissociation from the ATR complex and independently promoting the full activation of XCds1. Thus, the checkpoint-mediated activation of XCds1 requires phosphorylation by multiple phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinases, protein-protein dissociation, and autophosphorylation.     

Polyamines may regulate S-phase progression but not the dynamic changes of chromatin during the cell cycle

Several studies suggest that polyamines may stabilize chromatin and play a role in its structural alterations. In line with this idea, we found here by chromatin precipitation and micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion analyses, that spermidine and spermine stabilize or condense the nucleosomal organization of chromatin in vitro. We then investigated the possible physiological role of polyamines in the nucleosomal organization of chromatin during the cell cycle in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells deficient in ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity. An extended polyamine deprivation (for 4 days) was found to arrest 70% of the odc⁻ cells in S phase. MNase digestion analyses revealed that these cells have a highly loosened and destabilized nucleosomal organization. However, no marked difference in the chromatin structure was detected between the control and polyamine-depleted cells following the synchronization of the cells at the S-phase. We also show in synchronized cells that polyamine deprivation retards the traverse of the cells through the S phase already in the first cell cycle. Depletion of polyamines had no significant effect on the nucleosomal organization of chromatin in G₁–early S. The polyamine-deprived cells were also capable of condensing the nucleosomal organization of chromatin in the S/G₂ phase of the cell cycle. These data indicate that polyamines do not regulate the chromatin condensation state during the cell cycle, although they might have some stabilizing effect on the chromatin structure. Polyamines may, however, play an important role in the control of S-phase progression. J. Cell Biochem. 68:200–212, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

RPA2 is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint

Upon DNA damage, replication is inhibited by the S-phase checkpoint. ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated- and Rad3-related) is specifically involved in the inhibition of replicon initiation when cells are treated with DNA damage-inducing agents that stall replication forks, but the mechanism by which it acts to prevent replication is not yet fully understood. We observed that RPA2 is phosphorylated on chromatin in an ATR-dependent manner when replication forks are stalled. Mutation of the ATR-dependent phosphorylation sites in RPA2 leads to a defect in the down-regulation of DNA synthesis following treatment with UV radiation, although ATR activation is not affected. Threonine 21 and serine 33, two residues among several phosphorylation sites in the amino terminus of RPA2, are specifically required for the UV-induced, ATR-mediated inhibition of DNA replication. RPA2 mutant alleles containing phospho-mimetic mutations at ATR-dependent phosphorylation sites have an impaired ability to associate with replication centers, indicating that ATR phosphorylation of RPA2 directly affects the replication function of RPA. Our studies suggest that in response to UV-induced DNA damage, ATR rapidly phosphorylates RPA2, disrupting its association with replication centers in the S-phase and contributing to the inhibition of DNA replication.     

ATR regulates hexavalent chromium-induced S-phase checkpoint through phosphorylation of SMC1

Hexavalent chromium (Cr[VI]) is an industrial waste product known to cause nasal and lung cancer in exposed workers. Intracellularly, Cr[VI] undergoes a series of enzymatic reductions resulting in the formation of reactive chromate intermediates and oxygen free radicals. These metabolites react with DNA to cause numerous types of genomic lesions, but the cellular response to these genotoxic insults is poorly understood. Recently, we demonstrated that in response to DNA damage induced by Cr[VI], an ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and structural maintenance of chromosomal protein 1 (SMC1)-dependent S-phase checkpoint is activated. Interestingly, this checkpoint response was only ATM-dependent in cells exposed to low doses of Cr[VI], we demonstrate that the ATM and Rad3 related kinase, ATR, is required to activate the S-phase checkpoint. In response to all doses of Cr[VI], ATR is activated and phosphorylates SMC1 to facilitate the checkpoint. Further, chromatin binding ability of Rad17 is required for this process. Taken together, these results indicate that the Rad17-ATR-SMC1 pathway is essential for Cr[VI]-induced S-phase checkpoint activation.     

TOUSLED kinase activity oscillates during the cell cycle and interacts with chromatin regulators

The TOUSLED (TSL)-like nuclear protein kinase family is highly conserved in plants and animals. tsl loss of function mutations cause pleiotropic defects in both leaf and flower development, and growth and initiation of floral organ primordia is abnormal, suggesting that basic cellular processes are affected. TSL is more highly expressed in exponentially growing Arabidopsis culture cells than in stationary, nondividing cells. While its expression remains constant throughout the cell cycle in dividing cells, TSL kinase activity is higher in enriched late G2/M-phase and G1-phase populations of Arabidopsis suspension culture cells compared to those in S-phase. tsl mutants also display an aberrant pattern and increased expression levels of the mitotic cyclin gene CycB1;1, suggesting that TSL represses CycB1;1 expression at certain times during development or that cells are delayed in mitosis. TSL interacts with and phosphorylates one of two Arabidopsis homologs of the nucleosome assembly/silencing protein Asf1 and histone H3, as in humans, and a novel plant SANT/myb-domain protein, TKI1, suggesting that TSL plays a role in chromatin metabolism.     

Cell-cycle-specific activators of the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase

Mec1 [ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated- and Rad3-related) in humans] is the principle kinase responsible for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress and DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The heterotrimeric checkpoint clamp, 9-1-1 (checkpoint clamp of Rad9, Rad1 and Hus1 in humans and Ddc1, Rad17 and Mec3 in S. cerevisiae; Ddc1-Mec3-Rad17) and the DNA replication initiation factor Dpb11 (human TopBP1) are the two known activators of Mec1. The 9-1-1 clamp functions in checkpoint activation in G1- and G2-phase, but its employment differs between these two phases of the cell cycle. The Ddc1 (human Rad9) subunit of the clamp directly activates Mec1 in G1-phase, an activity identified only in S. cerevisiae so far. However, in G2-phase, the 9-1-1 clamp activates the checkpoint by two mechanisms. One mechanism includes direct activation of Mec1 by the unstructured C-terminal tail of Ddc1. The second mech-anism involves the recruitment of Dpb11 by the phosphorylated C-terminal tail of Ddc1. The latter mechanism is highly conserved and also functions in response to replication stress in higher eukaryotes. In S. cerevisiae, however, both the 9-1-1 clamp and the Dpb11 are partially redundant for checkpoint activation in response to replication stress, suggesting the existence of additional activators of Mec1.     

Critical role for mouse Hus1 in an S-phase DNA damage cell cycle checkpoint

Mouse Hus1 encodes an evolutionarily conserved DNA damage response protein. In this study we examined how targeted deletion of Hus1 affects cell cycle checkpoint responses to genotoxic stress. Unlike hus1(-) fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells, which are defective for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint, Hus1-null mouse cells did not inappropriately enter mitosis following genotoxin treatment. However, Hus1-deficient cells displayed a striking S-phase DNA damage checkpoint defect. Whereas wild-type cells transiently repressed DNA replication in response to benzo(a)pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE), a genotoxin that causes bulky DNA adducts, Hus1-null cells maintained relatively high levels of DNA synthesis following treatment with this agent. However, when treated with DNA strand break-inducing agents such as ionizing radiation (IR), Hus1-deficient cells showed intact S-phase checkpoint responses. Conversely, checkpoint-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in response to BPDE did not require NBS1, a component of the IR-responsive S-phase checkpoint pathway. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Hus1 is required specifically for one of two separable mammalian checkpoint pathways that respond to distinct forms of genome damage during S phase.     

Interplay between chromatin and cell cycle checkpoints in the context of ATR/ATM-dependent checkpoints

Maintenance of both genome stability and its structural organization into chromatin are essential to avoid aberrant gene expression that could lead to neoplasia. Genome integrity being threatened by various sources of genotoxic stresses, cells have evolved regulatory mechanisms, termed cell cycle checkpoints. In general, these surveillance pathways are thought to act mainly to coordinate proficient DNA repair with cell cycle progression. To date, this cellular response to genotoxic stress has been viewed mainly as a DNA-based signal transduction pathway. Recent studies, in both yeast and human, however, highlight possible connections between chromatin structure and cell cycle checkpoints, in particular those involving kinases of the ATM and ATR family, known as key response factors activated early in the checkpoint pathway. In this review, based on this example, we will discuss hypotheses for chromatin-based events as potential initiators of a checkpoint response or conversely, for chromatin-associated factors as targets of checkpoint proteins, promoting changes in chromatin structure, in order to make a lesion more accessible and contribute to a more efficient repair response.     

Identification of substrates of an S-phase cell cycle kinase from Leishmania donovani

Despite the importance of cyclin-Cdk related kinases (CRK) in regulation of cell and life cycle of kinetoplastida parasites, only limited knowledge about their substrates are presently available. Here, the potential substrates were searched for an S-phase LdCyc1-CRK3 complex from Leishmania donovani based on the presence of Cdk target phosphorylation site together with the cyclin interacting Cy-motif in genome-derived putative protein sequences. Three substrates could be identified with one of them being a unique protein with no known homologues. Another identified substrate is similar to MYST family of histone acetyl transferase and the third one contains Ku-70 related conserved domains. All the substrates interact directly with LdCyc1 and are phosphorylated in a Cy-motif dependent manner suggesting the importance of Cy-motif for their functions.     

Context-dependent cell cycle checkpoint abrogation by a novel kinase inhibitor

Background

Checkpoint kinase 1 and 2 (Chk1/Chk2), and the Aurora kinases play a critical role in the activation of the DNA damage response and mitotic spindle checkpoints. We have identified a novel inhibitor of these kinases and utilized this molecule to probe the functional interplay between these two checkpoints.

Principal Findings

Fragment screening, structure guided design, and kinase cross screening resulted in the identification of a novel, potent small molecule kinase inhibitor (VER-150548) of Chk1 and Chk2 kinases with IC₅₀s of 35 and 34 nM as well as the Aurora A and Aurora B kinases with IC₅₀s of 101 and 38 nM. The structural rationale for this kinase specificity could be clearly elucidated through the X-ray crystal structure. In human carcinoma cells, VER-150548 induced reduplication and the accumulation of cells with >4N DNA content, inhibited histone H3 phosphorylation and ultimately gave way to cell death after 120 hour exposure; a phenotype consistent with cellular Aurora inhibition. In the presence of DNA damage induced by cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs, VER-150548 abrogated DNA damage induced cell cycle checkpoints. Abrogation of these checkpoints correlated with increased DNA damage and rapid cell death in p53 defective HT29 cells. In the presence of DNA damage, reduplication could not be observed. These observations are consistent with the Chk1 and Chk2 inhibitory activity of this molecule.

Conclusions

In the presence of DNA damage, we suggest that VER-150548 abrogates the DNA damage induced checkpoints forcing cells to undergo a lethal mitosis. The timing of this premature cell death induced by Chk1 inhibition negates Aurora inhibition thereby preventing re-entry into the cell cycle and subsequent DNA reduplication. This novel kinase inhibitor therefore serves as a useful chemical probe to further understand the temporal relationship between cell cycle checkpoint pathways, chemotherapeutic agent induced DNA damage and cell death.     

Caffeine induces sister-chromatid exchanges during the whole S-phase of the cell cycle

The capacity of caffeine to induce sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) in different cell cycle stages and the proliferation kinetics were studied. Continuous treatment with this xanthine during the whole second cycle significantly increased the baseline SCE frequency. Pulse-treatment experiments showed that the induction of SCEs by caffeine, which was dose-dependent, was restricted to the S-phase of the cell cycle without effect on G1 or G2 cells. Moreover, unlike other SCE-inducing agents, such as DNA-synthesis inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents, caffeine produced similar SCE increases in cells treated at different times throughout the S-phase. In the light of Painter's model for SCE formation and the known effects of caffeine on the DNA replication pattern, the most likely mechanism of SCE induction by caffeine is an increase in the number of DNA-replication sites.     

ATR signaling mediates an S-phase checkpoint after inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity

Human fibroblasts, capable of expressing a kinase-dead form of ATR (ATRkd), can be sensitized to the cytotoxic effects of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) by the PARP inhibitor 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide (4-AN). The combination of MMS+4-AN results in accumulation of cells in S-phase of the cell cycle and activation of Chk1. Inhibition of ATR activity by expression of ATRkd suppresses the S-phase accumulation and partially reverses the Chk1 phosphorylation. The results confirm involvement of an ATR-mediated damage response pathway in the MMS+4-AN-induced S-phase cell cycle checkpoint in human fibroblasts. Consistent with this hypothesis, the inhibitors caffeine and UCN-01 also abrogate the ATR- and Chk1-mediated delay in progression through S-phase. In the absence of ATR-mediated signaling, MMS+4-AN exposure results in a G(2)/M arrest, rather than an S-phase checkpoint. Thus, whereas ATR mediates the S-phase response, it is not critical for arrest of cells in G(2)/M.     

Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 checkpoint kinase in signaling double-strand breaks during the meiotic cell cycle

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can arise at unpredictable locations after DNA damage or in a programmed manner during meiosis. DNA damage checkpoint response to accidental DSBs during mitosis requires the Rad53 effector kinase, whereas the meiosis-specific Mek1 kinase, together with Red1 and Hop1, mediates the recombination checkpoint in response to programmed meiotic DSBs. Here we provide evidence that exogenous DSBs lead to Rad53 phosphorylation during the meiotic cell cycle, whereas programmed meiotic DSBs do not. However, the latter can trigger phosphorylation of a protein fusion between Rad53 and the Mec1-interacting protein Ddc2, suggesting that the inability of Rad53 to transduce the meiosis-specific DSB signals might be due to its failure to access the meiotic recombination sites. Rad53 phosphorylation/activation is elicited when unrepaired meiosis-specific DSBs escape the recombination checkpoint. This activation requires homologous chromosome segregation and delays the second meiotic division. Altogether, these data indicate that Rad53 prevents sister chromatid segregation in the presence of unrepaired programmed meiotic DSBs, thus providing a salvage mechanism ensuring genetic integrity in the gametes even in the absence of the recombination checkpoint.     

Cooperative activation of the ATR checkpoint kinase by TopBP1 and damaged DNA

TopBP1, acting in concert with DNA containing bulky base lesions, stimulates ATR kinase activity under physiologically relevant reaction conditions. Here, we analyze the roles of the three components in ATR activation: DNA, base damage and TopBP1. We show that base adducts caused by a potent carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE), constitute a strong signal for TopBP1-dependent ATR kinase activity on Chk1 and p53. We find that the C-terminus of TopBP1 binds preferentially to damaged DNA and is sufficient to mediate damaged DNA-dependent ATR activation in a manner similar to full-length TopBP1. Significantly, we find that stimulation of ATR by BPDE-damaged DNA exhibits strong dependence on the length of DNA, with essentially no stimulation with fragments of 0.2 kb and reaching maximum stimulation with 2 kb fragments. Moreover, TopBP1 shows preferential binding to longer DNA fragments and, in contrast to previous biochemical studies, TopBP1 binding is completely independent of DNA ends. We find that TopBP1 binds to circular and linear DNAs with comparable affinities and that these DNA forms elicit the same level of TopBP1-dependent ATR activation. Taken together, these findings suggest a cooperative activation mechanism for the ATR checkpoint kinase by TopBP1 and damaged DNA.     

Coupling of chromatin structure to cell geometry during the cell cycle: Transformed versus reverse-transformed CHO

The cellular and nuclear morphometry of synchronized CHO cells growing on glass in the presence or absence of 10⁻³M of cAMP has been determined. Measurements were made at various time intervals following selective mitotic detachment. The changes in nuclear morphometry during the cycle of cells growing on glass confirms previous findings on similar cells growing in suspension. When cells are grown on glass, the cell shape also changes. Specifically, when cells are treated with cAMP, the cytoplasmic cell shape and condensation is directly coupled with nuclear chromatin shape and condensation, but they are uncoupled for the transformed cells.     

ATR enforces the topoisomerase II-dependent G2 checkpoint through inhibition of Plk1 kinase

An ATR-dependent G(2) checkpoint responds to inhibition of topoisomerase II and delays entry into mitosis by sustaining nuclear exclusion of cyclin B1-Cdk1 complexes. Here we report that induction of this checkpoint with ICRF-193, a topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitor that does not cause DNA damage, was associated with an ATR-dependent inhibition of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) kinase activity and a decrease in cyclin B1 phosphorylation. Expression of constitutively active Plk1 but not wild type Plk1 reversed ICRF-193-induced mitotic delay in HeLa cells, suggesting that Plk1 kinase activity is important for the checkpoint response to ICRF-193. G(2)/M synchronized normal human fibroblasts, when treated with ICRF-193, showed a decrease in cyclin B1 phosphorylation and Plk1 kinase activity despite high cyclin B1-Cdk1 kinase activity. G(2) fibroblasts that were treated with caffeine to override the checkpoint response to ICRF-193 displayed a high incidence of chromosomal aberrations. Taken together, these results suggest that ATR-dependent inhibition of Plk1 kinase activity may be one mechanism to regulate cyclin B1 phosphorylation and sustain nuclear exclusion during the G(2) checkpoint response to topoisomerase II inhibition. Moreover, the results demonstrate an important role for the topoisomerase II-dependent G(2) checkpoint in the preservation of human genomic stability.     

Multiple functions of the S-phase checkpoint mediator

There is mounting evidence that replication defects are the major source of spontaneous genomic instability in cells, and that S-phase checkpoints are the principal defense against such instability. The S-phase checkpoint mediator protein Mrc1/Claspin mediates the checkpoint response to replication stress by facilitating phosphorylation of effector kinase by a sensor kinase. In this review, the multiple functions and the regulation of the S-phase checkpoint mediator are discussed.