Are the progestins responsible for breast cancer risk during hormone therapy in the postmenopause? Experimental vs. clinical data

Evidence is increasing suggesting that adding progestins to estrogen replacement therapy may be more harmful then beneficial, however it is debatable whether all progestins act equally on breast epithelial cells.

Experimental data with the comparison of various progestins in the same in vitro model present a rather high evidence that there may be differences between the various progestins regarding breast cancer risk. Especially of concern may be to differentiate between primary and secondary risk i.e. between benign and malignant breast epithelial cells.

The epidemiological studies and especially the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial, so far the only prospective placebo-controlled interventional study, demonstrate an increased risk under combined estrogen/progestin therapy, but they have the limitations that they up to now cannot discriminate between the various progestins mostly due to too small or not comparable patient numbers in the subgroups with the various progestins. However, there is evidence that the natural progesterone, possibly also the transdermal usage of synthetic progestins, may avoid an increased risk, but this must be proven in further clinical trials.     

The effect of progesterone and synthetic progestins on serum- and estradiol-stimulated proliferation of human breast cancer cells.

The results from the Women's Health Initiative study on enhanced breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women using an estrogen/progestin combination clearly indicate the need for a comparison of different progestins with regard to cancer risk. To shed some light on this issue, we have investigated the influence of progesterone and various synthetic C19- and C21-progestins on cell proliferation of a human breast cancer cell line in vitro. Of special interested was the comparison of two different regimens commonly used in HRT, sequential and continuous combination with estradiol. We used the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 as a model. Progesterone (P), chlormadinone acetate (CMA), dienogest (DNG), gestodene (GSD), 3-ketodesogestrel (KDG), levonorgestrel (LNG), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and norethisterone (NET) were investigated in the range of 0.01nm to 10 micro M alone and in combination with 10 nM estradiol. Cell proliferation was measured after 7 days using the ATP chemosensitivity test. Tested alone, CMA, DNG, GSD, KDG, MPA and NET significantly stimulated cell proliferation, but only at high dosages. Sequentially combined with estradiol, only CMA inhibited cell proliferation over the whole concentration range. Slight effects were found for DNG, GSD and KDG, whereas P and MPA only showed an effect at the highest concentration. NET had no significant effect on cell proliferation. Continuously combined, all progestins exhibited an inhibitory effect over the whole concentration range. The most prominent effects were found for P, CMA, GSD, and KDG. Only slight effects were found for DNG, MPA and NET. Our in vitro results indicate that the influence on breast cancer risk using HRT in postmenopausal women might depend on the type of progestin used as well as on the regimen applied. However, the net inhibitory in vitro effect of the progestins at clinically relevant dosages is rather minimal, and whether progestins in general can reduce breast cancer risk in long-term treatment remains uncertain. Further clinical trials are urgently needed to clarify this issue.     

Progestins and progesterone in hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer

Controlled studies and most observational studies published over the last 5 years suggest that the addition of synthetic progestins to estrogen in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), particularly in continuous-combined regimen, increases the breast cancer (BC) risk compared to estrogen alone. By contrast, a recent study suggests that the addition of natural progesterone in cyclic regimens does not affect BC risk. This finding is consistent with in vivo data suggesting that progesterone does not have a detrimental effect on breast tissue. The increased BC risk found with the addition of synthetic progestins to estrogen could be due to the regimen and/or the kind of progestin used. Continuous-combined regimen inhibits the sloughing of mammary epithelium that occurs after progesterone withdrawal in a cyclic regimen. More importantly, the progestins used (medroxyprogesterone acetate and 19-Nortestosterone-derivatives) are endowed with some non-progesterone-like effects, which can potentiate the proliferative action of estrogens. Particularly relevant seem to be the metabolic and hepatocellular effects (decreased insulin sensitivity, increased levels and activity of insulin-like growth factor-I, and decreased levels of SHBG), which contrast the opposite effects induced by oral estrogen.     

Progestins and menopause: epidemiological studies of risks of endometrial and breast cancer

Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) increases a woman's risk of developing endometrial cancer approximately 120% for each 5 years of use. ERT increases a woman's risk of developing breast cancer approximately 10% for each 5 years of use. To reduce the greatly increased endometrial cancer risk, progestins have been added to ERT (estrogen-progestin replacement therapy; EPRT) for between 5 and 15 days (usually 7 or 10 days) per month in a sequential fashion (sequential EPRT; SEPRT) or with each dose of ERT (continuous-combined EPRT; CEPRT). We conducted two large case-control studies in postmenopausal women in Los Angeles to evaluate the effects of these changes on endometrial and breast cancer risks. As expected CEPRT was not associated with any increased risk of endometrial cancer. SEPRT with the progestin being given for 10 days per month also did not increase endometrial cancer risk. SEPRT with the progestin being given for 7 days per month did increase endometrial cancer risk with only a relatively slight reduction in risk compared to ERT effectively proportional to the reduction in the number of days of unopposed estrogen. The sharp contrast between the effects of 7 days and 10 days of progestin in SEPRT suggests that the extent of endometrial sloughing or of 'terminal' differentiation at the completion of the progestin phase may play a critical role in determining endometrial cancer risk. This may provide an explanation of why endometrial cancer risk increases so sharply with age in young women even in countries where obesity-associated anovulation is very uncommon; extended periods of unopposed estrogen is not an explanation but less than 10 days of an 'adequate' progesterone level may be. EPRT significantly increased the risk of breast cancer. EPRT was associated with an approximately 24% increase in risk for each 5 years of use; the effect was some 212-fold greater than the effect of ERT, which we had previously predicted on theoretical grounds. This effect could also be predicted from the results on mammographic densities seen in the PEPI randomized trial of different forms of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). In the PEPI trial EPRT increased mammographic densities to a much greater extent than ERT. Progestins need to be given to protect the endometrium. They need to be delivered to the endometrium in a manner that will have the least effect on the breast. This can be carried out by using a vaginal or direct endometrial route of administration. The vaginal route will provide adequate endometrial progestin levels with low blood levels so that the effects of the progestin on the breast should be small; with the direct endometrial route the blood progestin levels are even lower, and the effects of the progestin on the breast will be effectively zero. If this is unacceptable to a woman, then giving progestins by mouth (or transdermally) for 10 days every 3 to 4 months should provide satisfactory protection of the endometrium when used with standard-dose conjugated estrogen (CE). This regimen has much less effect on the breast than monthly SEPRT or CEPRT. Two clinical trials of 10 mg per day of MPA for 14 days every 3 months and 0.625 mg/day of CE have been published. Both studies suggest that this approach may be satisfactory in that the extent of hyperplasia was minimal. More studies of this approach are urgently needed.     

Menopausal hormone therapy and cancer: Changing clinical observations of target site specificity

Menopausal hormone therapy with estrogen plus progestin or estrogen alone (for women with prior hysterectomy) is still used by millions of women for climacteric symptom management throughout the world. Until 2002, hormone therapy influence on cancer risk and other chronic diseases was determined through observational study reports. Since then, results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized, placebo-controlled hormone therapy trials have substantially changed concepts regarding estrogen plus progestin and estrogen alone influence on the most common cancers in postmenopausal women. In these trials, estrogen plus progestin significantly increased breast cancer incidence and deaths from breast cancer, significantly increased deaths from lung cancer, significantly decreased endometrial cancer, and did not have a clinically significant influence on colorectal cancer. In contrast, estrogen alone use in women with prior hysterectomy significantly reduced breast cancer incidence and deaths from breast cancer without significant influence on colorectal cancer or lung cancer. These complex results are discussed in the context of known potential mediating mechanisms of action involved in interaction with steroid hormone receptors.     

Effects of Combination of Estradiol with Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators (SPRMs) on Human Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo

Use of estrogen or estrogen / progestin combination was an approved regimen for menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT). However, more recent patient-centered studies revealed an increase in the incidence of breast cancer in women receiving menopausal hormone therapy with estrogen plus progestin rather than estrogen alone. Tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) has been proposed to eliminate the progesterone component of MHT with supporting evidences. Based on our previous studies it is evident that SPRMs have a safer profile on endometrium in preventing unopposed estrogenicity. We hypothesized that a combination of estradiol (E2) with selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM) to exert a safer profile on endometrium will also reduce mammary gland proliferation and could be used to prevent breast cancer when used in MHT. In order to test our hypothesis, we compared the estradiol alone or in combination with our novel SPRMs, EC312 and EC313. The compounds were effectively controlled E2 mediated cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in T47D breast cancer cells. The observed effects were found comparable that of BZD in vitro. The effects of SPRMs were confirmed by receptor binding studies as well as gene and protein expression studies. Proliferation markers were found downregulated with EC312/313 treatment in vitro and reduced E2 induced mammary gland proliferation, evidenced as reduced ductal branching and terminal end bud growth in vivo. These data supporting our hypothesis that E2+EC312/EC313 blocked the estrogen action may provide basic rationale to further test the clinical efficacy of SPRMs to prevent breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women undergoing MHT.     

Estrogens in the causation of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers - evidence and hypotheses from epidemiological findings

Estrogens along with progesterone/progestins, and other hormones, are important determinants of cancer in the breast, endometrium and ovary. Estrogens may increase the risk of breast cancer through various mechanisms and at various phases of life, with a possible synergistic effect of progesterone/progestins. Exposure to high doses of placental hormones, such as estrogens and/or progesterone, during pregnancy may play a pivotal role in reducing subsequent breast cancer susceptibility. Estrogens cause endometrial cancer, an effect that can be reduced, prevented or reversed by progesterone/progestin — if allowed to act for a sufficiently long period of each cycle. The role of sex hormones seems important for ovarian carcinogenesis. Intake of combined oral contraceptives has a substantial and well-documented protective effect on endometrial and ovarian cancer risks. Epidemiological observations and experimental data from an animal model indicate that estrogens may have an adverse effect, while progesterone/progestins have a risk reducing effect directly on the ovarian epithelium. Thus, estrogens and other sex hormones have potential effects on the three most important female cancers. Research has yet to define how some of the risk factors can be modified or treatment regimens can be improved to reduce these cancer risks.     

Benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy (HRT)

In western countries more than 30% of the female population are postmenopausal. Approximately 30% of postmenopausal women suffer from clinical symptoms of the climacteric such as vasomotor symptoms, associated with hot flushes, night sweat, insomnia and depressive mood. Sufficient hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) will abolish specific menopausal symptoms in over 90% of patients, unspecific symptoms such as headache respond to placebo and HRT equally well. The question of cancer risk related to HRT will be addressed in this review. In combination with progestins, estrogens are obviously protective regarding ovarian and endometrial cancer. The association between HRT and breast cancer risk is presently unclear. Epidemiological data available so far do not provide compelling evidence as to a cause and effect relationship between HRT and breast cancer risk. There seems to be an overall trend towards a slightly increased risk with increasing duration of HRT use. Guidelines for HRT use in women with a history of endometrial and breast cancer are provided in this article.     

Progestins both stimulate and inhibit breast cancer cell cycle progression while increasing expression of transforming growth factor alpha, epidermal growth factor receptor, c-fos, and c-myc genes.

This study documents a biphasic change in the rate of cell cycle progression and proliferation of T-47D human breast cancer cells treated with synthetic progestins, consisting of an initial transient acceleration in transit through G1, followed by cell cycle arrest and growth inhibition. Both components of the response were mediated via the progesterone receptor. The data are consistent with a model in which the action of progestins is to accelerate cells already progressing through G1, which are then arrested early in G1 after completing a round of replication, as are cells initially in other phases of the cell cycle. Such acceleration implies that progestins act on genes or gene products which are rate limiting for cell cycle progression. Increased production of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha, putative autocrine growth factors in breast cancer cells, does not appear to account for the initial response to progestins, since although the mRNA abundance for these growth factors is rapidly induced by progestins, cells treated with epidermal growth factor or transforming growth factor alpha did not enter S phase until 5 to 6 h later than those stimulated by progestin. The proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-myc were rapidly but transiently induced by progestin treatment, paralleling the well-known response of these genes to mitogenic signals in other cell types. The progestin antagonist RU 486 inhibited progestin regulation of both cell cycle progression and c-myc expression, suggesting that this proto-oncogene may participate in growth modulation by progestins.     

Progestins in the menopause

While the benefits of progestin use in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are well recognised as far as endometrial protection is concerned, their risks and drawbacks have generated controversial articles. The data related to the progestin effect on breast tissue has been interpreted differently from country to country. However it has been admitted that, according to the type of progestin used, the dose and duration of its application, a predominant antiproliferative effect is observed in the human breast cells. As far as breast cancer risk is concerned, most epidemiological studies do not suggest any difference between the estrogens given alone or combined to progestins in HRT. When the cardiovascular risk factors are considered, some molecules with a higher androgenic potency than others, attenuate the beneficial effects of estrogens on the lipid profile and the vasomotion as well. On the other hand, other progestins devoid of androgenic properties do not exert these deleterious effects. The epidemiological data does not suggest any negative effect of the progestins administered together with estrogens on cardiovascular morbidity or mortality.

However, recent results suggest that in women with established coronary heart disease (CHD), HRT may not protect against further heart attacks, when the progestin selected possesses androgenic properties.

Complying with the classic contra indications of HRT and selecting molecules devoid of estrogenic, androgenic, or glucocorticoid effect should allow a larger use of the progestins without any major drawback.     

MPA and postmenopausal coronary artery atherosclerosis revisited

Whether progestins, particularly medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), attenuate the cardiovascular benefits of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) has been controversial for over a decade. Concerns related first to findings that MPA attenuated increases of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) concentrations of postmenopausal women compared to conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) alone. That observation was followed by early cynomolgus monkey studies that suggested MPA decreased estrogen's cardiovascular benefits (vascular reactivity and coronary artery atherosclerosis inhibition). In a more recent and larger trial with cynomolgus monkeys, no differences were seen in the coronary artery atherosclerosis protective effect of CEE when MPA was co-administered (HRT). The lack of attenuation of ERTs benefits by progestins has also been seen in at least three studies of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) of postmenopausal women. Additionally, the majority of studies of vascular reactivity of postmenopausal women have not found differences when CEE is given alone or with MPA. Seven observational studies of cardiovascular outcomes of postmenopausal women permit separate consideration of ERT versus HRT use; there is no evidence of attenuation of ERTs benefits by progestin use. In conclusion, it is evident that the current experimental, clinical, and observational data do not provide evidence that progestins attenuate estrogen's cardiovascular benefits.     

Prolonged progestin treatment induces the promoter of CDK inhibitor p21 Cip1,Waf1 through activation of p53 in human breast and endometrial tumor cells

Progestins are frequently used in the treatment of advanced breast and endometrial cancer. The human breast carcinoma cell line T47D shows a biphasic response to progestins. Short-term progestin treatment leads to enhanced DNA synthesis, while this line is growth inhibited upon prolonged exposure. An important protein involved in growth regulation by progestins in this cell is the CDK inhibitor p21(Cip1,Waf1). We show that after 1 day of progestin treatment in T47D cells, the p21 promoter-proximal region containing Sp1 binding sites is crucial in the induction by progestins. However, after 3 days the activity of the promoter-distal region becomes predominant in T47D cells or the endometrial carcinoma cell line ECC1. This is dependent upon two domains within this region that contain p53 response elements. In ECC1 and T47D cells 3-day progestin treatment induces a reporter containing a p53 response element, but not a mutated version. This induction is due to activation of p53 by progestin, which may be caused by nuclear translocation of p53. These data indicate that upon prolonged exposure, progestins activate p53, in human breast and endometrial tumor cells, which up-regulates the p21(Cip1,Waf1) promoter. This may be an important mechanism involved in progestin-inhibited cellular proliferation in these cells.     

A progestin effect on lactate dehydrogenase in the human breast cancer cell line T-47D

The human breast cancer cell line T-47D has high levels of progesterone receptor even in the absence of exogenously added estrogen. Because of this it is a good line in which to study aspects of progestin action. It has been shown by others that lactate dehydrogenase in MCF-7 cells is responsive to estrogen but not to progesterone. Other proteins in other systems have been found to be responsive to both estrogen and progesterone, often requiring priming by estrogen, presumably to produce sufficiently high quantities of progesterone receptor. Reasoning that lactate dehydrogenase in T-47D cells might be stimulated by progestins alone at physiological levels since these cells already have high levels of progesterone receptor, we now report that this is indeed the case.     

Estrogens, progestins, and coronary artery reactivity in atherosclerotic monkeys

It has been known for many years that sex hormones modulate vasodilator responses of arteries supplying the uterus with blood. Recently, it has been shown that sex hormones such as estrogen modulate vasomotor responses of other arteries, including coronary arteries. It is thought that modulation of vasodilator and constrictor responses of coronary arteries may be one mechanism by which estrogen affects the risk of coronary heart disease. Although several studies have examined the effects (and potential mechanisms) of estrogen on vasodilator responses of nonatherosclerotic arteries, few have focused on estrogen's effects on atherosclerotic coronary arteries. In studies of ovariectomized atherosclerotic female cynomolgus monkeys, both long-term (2 years) and short-term (20 min) estradiol treatment augments dilator responses to acetylcholine, but not nitroglycerin. Presumably, this indicates an effect of estradiol on endothelium-mediated dilator responses of coronary arteries. Addition of the progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate diminishes the beneficial effect of conjugated equine estrogens on these dilator responses. This is significant because a progestin is usually added to estrogen replacement to reduce the risk of endometrial and breast cancer associated with unopposed estrogen therapy. However, it would seem that not all progestins act similarly on vascular reactivity. Studies in monkeys indicate that addition of progesterone or the progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate does not diminish the beneficial effects of estrogen on coronary dilator responses. Thus it would appear that different estrogen/progestin combinations may affect vascular reactivity in different manners, There is also an effort being made to examine the potential of different kinds of estrogens on cardiovascular risk. Studies in monkeys indicate that one of the estrogens found in conjugated equine estrogens (17 alpha-dihydroequilenin) has estrogen effects on vascular reactivity without having detrimental effects on uterine pathology. The isoflavones “plant estrogens” found in soy protein also have estrogenic effects on vascular reactivity and inhibition.     

Progestin effects on long-term growth, death, and Bcl-xL in breast cancer cells

The effect of progestins on proliferation of breast cancer has been a controversial area. We have consistently reported progestin stimulation of proliferation in the progesterone receptor-rich human breast cancer cell line T47D. Other authors, under other conditions, have agreed that progestins stimulate, but for just one turn of the cell cycle. To our knowledge, this is the first in vitro report to show progestin stimulation of human breast cancer cell growth for multiple, probably unlimited, cell cycles, while control cells are dying. This is accompanied by progestin up-regulation of the antiapoptotic protein bcl-xL, no effect on the proapoptotic protein bax, and, surprisingly, diminution of the antiapoptotic protein bcl-2. Thus, progestins both serve as survival factors and stimulate proliferation, implying a possible similar role in breast cancer patients. The data support the notion that many patients may benefit more from combined antiprogestin-antiestrogen therapy than from antiestrogen alone, and suggest bcl-x(L) as a possible target for breast cancer therapy.     

Progestin stimulation of thymidine kinase in the human breast cancer cell line T47D

Our laboratory has previously reported that progestins stimulate growth of the human breast cancer cell line T47D. In an attempt to probe further into this stimulation, we are investigating progestin effects on thymidine kinase (EC 2.7.1.21), an enzyme known to be involved in growth regulation. This report relates our finding that progestins stimulate thymidine kinase activity, at physiological progestin concentrations, in a dose-responsive manner. Estradiol-17 beta also stimulates, but testosterone, hydrocortisone and aldosterone do not. The antiprogestin RU486 inhibits progestin stimulation, but also stimulates on its own. Maximal by 24 h, the progestin stimulation then falls off with time. Experiments with actinomycin D and cycloheximide suggest that the thymidine kinase stimulation depends on new RNA and protein synthesis. These data shed further light on progestin stimulation of the growth of human breast cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first report of progestin stimulation of thymidine kinase in human breast cancer cells.     

Progestin stimulation of thymidine kinase in the human breast cancer cell line T74D

Our laboratory has previously reported that progestins stimulate growth of the human breast cancer cell line T47D. In an attempt to probe further into this stimulation, we are investigating progestin effects of thymidine kinase (EC 2.7.1.21), an enzyme known to be involved in growth regulation. This report relates our finding that progestins stimulate thymidine kinase activity, at physiological progestin concentrations, in a dose-responsive manner. Estradiol-17β also stimulates, but testosterone, hydrocortisone and aldosterone do not. The antiprogestin RU486 inhibits progestin stimulation, but also stimulates on its own. Maximal by 24 h, the progestin stimulation then falls off with time. Experiments with actinomycin D and cycloheximide suggest that the thymidine kinase stimulation depends on new RNA and protein synthesis. These data shed further light on progestin stimulation of the growth of human breast cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first report of progestin stimulation of thymidine kinase in human breast cancer cells.