GHL1-GHL15: new families of hypothetical glycoside hydrolases

Domains of fifteen recently found families of hypothetical glycoside hydrolases (GHL1-GHL15) have been used for iterative screening of the protein database. Evolutionary connections between representatives of these families were revealed. Also, their relationship with members of the following known families of protein domains were found: GH5, GH13, GH13_33, GH17, GH18, GH20, GH27, GH29, GH31, GH35, GH36A, GH36B, GH36C, GH36D, GH36E, GH36F, GH36G, GH36H, GH36J, GH36K, GH39, GH42, GH53, GH66, GH97, GH101, GH107, GH112, GH114, COG1082, COG1306, COG1649, COG2342, DUF3111, and PF00962. The unclassified homologues were grouped into 35 new families of hypothetical glycoside hydrolases: GHL16-GHL50. Position of GHL1-GHL15 families in the hierarchical classification of glycoside hydrolases and their homologues is discussed. Several new superfamilies of protein domains are suggested.     

Alpha-agarases define a new family of glycoside hydrolases, distinct from beta-agarase families

The gene encoding the alpha-agarase from "Alteromonas agarilytica" (proposed name) has been cloned and sequenced. The gene product (154 kDa) is unrelated to beta-agarases and instead belongs to a new family of glycoside hydrolases (GH96). The alpha-agarase also displays a complex modularity, with the presence of five thrombospondin type 3 repeats and three carbohydrate-binding modules.     

Hierarchical classification of glycoside hydrolases

This review deals with structural and functional features of glycoside hydrolases, a widespread group of enzymes present in almost all living organisms. Their catalytic domains are grouped into 120 amino acid sequence-based families in the international classification of the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy database). At a higher hierarchical level some of these families are combined in 14 clans. Enzymes of the same clan have common evolutionary origin of their genes and share the most important functional characteristics such as composition of the active center, anomeric configuration of cleaved glycosidic bonds, and molecular mechanism of the catalyzed reaction (either inverting, or retaining). There are now extensive data in the literature concerning the relationship between glycoside hydrolase families belonging to different clans and/or included in none of them, as well as information on phylogenetic protein relationship within particular families. Summarizing these data allows us to propose a multilevel hierarchical classification of glycoside hydrolases and their homologs. It is shown that almost the whole variety of the enzyme catalytic domains can be brought into six main folds, large groups of proteins having the same three-dimensional structure and the supposed common evolutionary origin.     

A common molecular signature unifies the chitosanases belonging to families 46 and 80 of glycoside hydrolases

The 3D structure-oriented alignment of the primary sequences of fourteen chitosanases, mainly of bacterial origin and belonging to families 46 and 80 of glycoside hydrolases, resulted in the identification of the following pattern common to all these enzymes: E-[DNQ]-x(8,17)-Y-x(7)-D-x-[RD]-[GP]-x-[TS]-x(3)-[AIVFLY]-G- x(5,11)-D. This pattern is proposed as the molecular signature of the chitosanases from families 46 and 80. It includes several amino acids essential for enzyme activity and (or) stability as shown by site-directed mutagenesis studies on the chitosanase from Streptomyces sp. N174. In particular, it includes two carboxylic residues directly involved in catalysis. We suggest that there is a continuum of sequence similarity between all the analyzed chitosanases, and that all these enzymes should probably be classified in one family.     

Molecular basis of substrate specificity in family 1 glycoside hydrolases

ss-glycosidases are active upon a large range of substrates. Besides this, subtle changes in the substrate structure may result in large modifications on the ss-glycosidase activity. The characterization of the molecular basis of ss-glycosidases substrate preference may contribute to the comprehension of the enzymatic specificity, a fundamental property of biological systems. ss-glycosidases specificity for the monosaccharide of the substrate nonreducing end (glycone) is controlled by a hydrogen bond network involving at least 5 active site amino acid residues and 4 substrate hydroxyls. From these residues, a glutamate, which interacts with hydroxyls 4 and 6, seems to be a key element in the determination of the preference for fucosides, glucosides and galactosides. Apart from this, interactions with the hydroxyl 2 are essential to the ss-glycosidase activity. The active site residues forming these interactions and the pattern of the hydrogen bond network are conserved among all ss-glycosidases. The region of the ss-glycosidase active site that interacts with the moiety (called aglycone) which is bound to the glycone is formed by several subsites (1 to 3). However, the majority of the non-covalent interactions with the aglycone is concentrated in the first one, which presents a variable spatial structure and amino acid composition. This structural variability is in accordance with the high diversity of aglycones recognized by ss-glycosidases. Hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds are formed with the aglycone, but the manner in which they control the ss-glycosidase specificity still remains to be determined.     

Physiological roles of plant glycoside hydrolases

The functions of plant glycoside hydrolases and transglycosidases have been studied using different biochemical and molecular genetic approaches. These enzymes are involved in the metabolism of various carbohydrates containing compounds present in the plant tissues. The structural and functional diversity of the carbohydrates implies a vast spectrum of enzymes involved in their metabolism. Complete genome sequence of Arabidopsis and rice has allowed the classification of glycoside hydrolases in different families based on amino acid sequence data. The genomes of these plants contain 29 families of glycoside hydrolases. This review summarizes the current research on plant glycoside hydrolases concerning their principal functional roles, which were attributed to different families. The majority of these plant glycoside hydrolases are involved in cell wall polysaccharide metabolism. Other functions include their participation in the biosynthesis and remodulation of glycans, mobilization of energy, defence, symbiosis, signalling, secondary plant metabolism and metabolism of glycolipids.     

Detailed comparative analysis of the catalytic mechanisms of beta-N-acetylglucosaminidases from families 3 and 20 of glycoside hydrolases

Beta-N-acetylglucosaminidases are commonly occurring enzymes involved in the degradation of polysaccharides and glycoconjugates containing N-acetylglucosamine residues. Such enzymes have been classified into glycoside hydrolase families 3 and 20 and are believed to follow distinct chemical mechanisms. Family 3 enzymes are thought to follow a standard retaining mechanism involving a covalent glycosyl enzyme intermediate while family 20 enzymes carry out a substrate-assisted mechanism involving the transient formation of an enzyme-sequestered oxazoline or oxazolinium ion intermediate. Detailed mechanistic analysis of representatives of these two families provides support for these mechanisms as well as detailed insights into transition state structure. Alpha-secondary deuterium kinetic isotope effects of kH/kD = 1.07 and 1.10 for Streptomyces plicatus beta-hexosaminidase (SpHex) and Vibrio furnisii beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase (ExoII) respectively indicate transition states with oxocarbenium ion character in each case. Br?nsted plots for hydrolysis of a series of aryl hexosaminides are quite different in the two cases. For SpHex a large degree of proton donation is suggested by the relatively low value of beta(lg) (-0.29) on kcat/Km, compared with a beta(lg) of -0.79 for ExoII. Most significantly the Taft plots derived from kinetic parameters for a series of p-nitrophenyl N-acyl glucosaminides bearing differing levels of fluorine substitution in the N-acyl group are completely different. A very strong dependence (slope = -1.29) is seen for SpHex, indicating direct nucleophilic participation by the acetamide, while essentially no dependence (0.07) is seen for ExoII, suggesting that the acetamide plays purely a binding role. Taken together these data provide unprecedented insight into enzymatic glycosyl transfer mechanisms wherein the structures of both the nucleophile and the leaving group are systematically varied.     

Cellular localization of glycoside hydrolases inBacteroides fragilis

The localizations of six glycosidases produced byBacteroides fragilis—-glucosidase, -glucosidase, -galactosidase, -galactosidase, -N-acetylglucosaminidase, and -l-fucosidase—were studied. Cell fractions and cell extracts were obtained by Triton X-100 release, by disruption by freeze-pressing and sonication, and by osmotic release. Isoelectric focusing of a cytoplasmic and of a Triton X-100 extract of the cell wall fraction was performed and revealed differences in the relative distribution of differently charged forms of -N-acetylglucosaminidase. -Galactosidase and alkaline phosphatase were used as cytoplasmic and periplasmic markers, respectively. It is concluded that inB. fragilis -glucosidase is periplasmic, -l-fucosidase and -galactosidase are cytoplasmic, and -n-acetylglucosaminidase is cell associated and bound to the cell envelope by hydrophobic interactions. -Glucosidase and -galactosidase are localized cytoplasmically and/or located in the cell envelope.     

Glycosyltransferases, glycoside hydrolases: surprise, surprise!

Several in the field-and many outside-consider that solving the three-dimensional structures of more glycoside hydrolases (GHs) and glycosyltransferases (GTs) confines to stamp collection and some even think that there is no main revelation to expect in this area. It is wrong! The past year has come as a refreshing wake-up call with major surprises for both GHs and GTs.     

Phylogenetic analysis of family 6 glycoside hydrolases

Multiple sequence alignment separates members of glycoside hydrolase Family 6 into eight subfamilies: one of mainly actinobacterial endoglucanases (EGs), one of ascomycotal EGs, one of chytridiomycotal EGs and cellobiohydrolases (CBHs), one of actinobacterial and proteobacterial CBHs, one of chytridiomycotal CBHs, two of ascomycotal CBHs, and one of basidiomycotal CBHs. Each also has some proteins of unknown function. Multiple sequence alignment also extends to all of Family 6 the observation that lengths of loops that form the active-site tunnel in CBHs vary among subfamilies, and along with loop conformations, determine enzyme function.     

Purification of glycoside hydrolases from Bacteroides fragilis.

Six glycoside hydrolases in the culture medium of Bacteroides fragilis--alpha-glucosidase, beta-glucosidase, alpha-galactosidase, beta-galactosidase, beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase, and alpha-L-fucosidase-were systematically purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation, gel filtration chromatography, and density gradient isoelectric focusing. The isoelectric focusing resolved the glycosidases into distinct, well-separated fractions and revealed three differently charged forms of beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase and of alpha-L-fucosidase. Furthermore, alpha-glucosidase and beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase were shown to possess dual affinities for the respective galactoside substrates, and beta-galactosidase also hydrolyzed beta-D-fucoside. alpha-Glucosidase was purified to homogeneity, as indicated by a thin-layer isoelectric focusing zymogram technique. The glycosidases, with exception of beta-glucosidase and the acid alpha-L-fucosidase, were each separated from other glycosidic activities to 99%. The molecular weights varied between 58,000 and 125,000. The pH optima ranged from 4.8 to 6.9.     

Purification of some glycoside hydrolases by affinity chromatography

Two glycoproteins have been isolated from the cell walls of baker's yeast. One is a glucan-protein complex which has been partially characterised as having a branched carbohydrate structure composed of chains of (1→3)-linked β-d-glucosyl residues, some of which are attached by (1→6)-linkages to the main chain. Immobilization of this glycoprotein was achieved by covalent attachment to Sepharose, and the product was used to isolate a number of (1→3)-β-d-glucan hydrolases from Helix pomatia, malted barley, and Basidiomycete QM806. The second glycoprotein, a mannan-protein complex, after immobilization, has been used in the purification of an α-d-mannosidase from jack-bean meal.     

GH10 family of glycoside hydrolases: Structure and evolutionary connections

Evolutionary connections were analyzed for endo-β-xylanases, which possess the GH10 family catalytic domains. A homology search yielded thrice as many proteins as are available from the Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZy) database. Lateral gene transfer was shown to play an important role in evolution of bacterial proteins of the family, especially in the phyla Acidobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Planctomycetes, Spirochaetes, and Verrucomicrobia. In the case of Verrucomicrobia, 23 lateral transfers from organisms of other phyla were detected. Evolutionary relationships were observed between the GH10 family domains and domains with the TIM-barrel tertiary structure from several other glycosidase families. The GH39 family of glycoside hydrolases showed the closest relationship. Unclassified homologs were grouped into 12 novel families of putative glycoside hydrolases (GHL51–GHL62).     

Radiation and functional specialization of the family-3 glycoside hydrolases

A phylogenetic analysis of the glycoside hydrolases of family 3 (GH3s) was conducted in order to infer particular trends in its evolution: functional specialization, gene transfer events, gene duplications and paralogous evolution, and gene deletions. The phylogenetic analysis of GH3s revealed six clusters, i.e., A, B, C, D, E, and F that could fit the definition of 3 sub-families, i.e., AB, AB' and AB". While the sub-families AB' and AB" contain a single cluster, F and E, respectively, the AB sub-family is sub-divided into four clusters. Global analysis of the GH3 phylogenetic tree suggests a primary burst of amplification of the GH3s that might have led to these sub-families. Specializations, gene transfers, and gene duplications among each of these sub-families and phylogenetic clusters might then have occurred and have been inferred. The fine comparison of the enzyme properties and phylogenetic relationships of GH3s allowed to detect common functional groups that belong to the same cluster (D, E or F), or sub-cluster (A1, A2 or B2). The prokaryotic and eukaryotic beta-xylosidases and beta-glucosidases belong to the AB and AB' sub-families, and the N-acetylglucosaminidases are in sub-family AB" (in cluster E). In some instances (B1, B2, C1, C2, and C3), the lack of data and/or the high heterogeneity of the hydrolytic properties did not allow to infer a particular link between an enzyme functional group and a phylogenetic cluster, suggesting the emergence of some highly specialized GH3s.     

Characterization and synergistic interactions of Fibrobacter succinogenes glycoside hydrolases

The objectives of this study were to characterize Fibrobacter succinogenes glycoside hydrolases from different glycoside hydrolase families and to study their synergistic interactions. The gene encoding a major endoglucanase (endoglucanase 1) of F. succinogenes S85 was identified as cel9B from the genome sequence by reference to internal amino acid sequences of the purified native enzyme. Cel9B and two other glucanases from different families, Cel5H and Cel8B, were cloned and overexpressed, and the proteins were purified and characterized. These proteins in conjunction with two predominant cellulases, Cel10A, a chloride-stimulated cellobiosidase, and Cel51A, formerly known as endoglucanase 2 (or CelF), were assayed in various combinations to assess their synergistic interactions using ball-milled cellulose. The degree of synergism ranged from 0.6 to 3.7. The two predominant endoglucanases produced by F. succinogenes, Cel9B and Cel51A, were shown to have a synergistic effect of up to 1.67. Cel10A showed little synergy in combination with Cel9B and Cel51A. Mixtures containing all the enzymes gave a higher degree of synergism than those containing two or three enzymes, which reflected the complementarity in their modes of action as well as substrate specificities.     

Comparative modeling of the three-dimensional structures of family 3 glycoside hydrolases

There are approximately 100 known members of the family 3 group of glycoside hydrolases, most of which are classified as beta-glucosidases and originate from microorganisms. The only family 3 glycoside hydrolase for which a three-dimensional structure is available is a beta-glucan exohydrolase from barley. The structural coordinates of the barley enzyme is used here to model representatives from distinct phylogenetic clusters within the family. The majority of family 3 hydrolases have an NH(2)-terminal (alpha/beta)(8) barrel connected by a short linker to a second domain, which adopts an (alpha/beta)(6) sandwich fold. In two bacterial beta-glucosidases, the order of the domains is reversed. The catalytic nucleophile, equivalent to D285 of the barley beta-glucan exohydrolase, is absolutely conserved across the family. It is located on domain 1, in a shallow site pocket near the interface of the domains. The likely catalytic acid in the barley enzyme, E491, is on domain 2. Although similarly positioned acidic residues are present in closely related members of the family, the equivalent amino acid in more distantly related members is either too far from the active site or absent. In the latter cases, the role of catalytic acid is probably assumed by other acidic amino acids from domain 1.     

Characterization of surface binding sites in glycoside hydrolases: A computational study

Structural properties of carbohydrate surface binding sites (SBSs) were investigated with computational methods. Eighty‐five SBSs of 44 enzymes in 119 Protein Data Bank (PDB) files were collected as a dataset. On the basis of SBSs shape, they were divided into 3 categories: flat surfaces, clefts, and cavities (types A, B, and C, respectively). Ligand varieties showed the correlation between shape of SBSs and ligands size. To reduce cut‐off differences in each SBSs with different ligand size, molecular docking were performed. Molecular docking results were used to refine SBSs classification and binding sites cut‐off. Docking results predicted putative ligands positions and displayed dependence of the ligands binding mode to the structural type of SBSs. Physicochemical properties of SBSs were calculated for all docking results with YASARA Structure. The results showed that all SBSs are hydrophilic, while their charges could vary and depended to ligand size and defined cut‐off. Surface binding sites type B had highest average values of solvent accessible surface area. Analysis of interactions showed that hydrophobic interactions occur more than hydrogen bonds, which is related to the presence of aromatic residues and carbohydrates interactions.