Paradoxical Condensation of Copper with Elevated ��-Amyloid in Lipid Rafts under Cellular Copper Deficiency Conditions: IMPLICATIONS FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE*

Redox-active copper is implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD), β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) aggregation, and amyloid formation. Aβ·copper complexes have been identified in AD and catalytically oxidize cholesterol and lipid to generate H₂O₂ and lipid peroxides. The site and mechanism of this abnormality is not known. Growing evidence suggests that amyloidogenic processing of the β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) occurs in lipid rafts, membrane microdomains enriched in cholesterol. β- and γ-secretases, and Aβ have been identified in lipid rafts in cultured cells, human and rodent brains, but the role of copper in lipid raft amyloidogenic processing is presently unknown. In this study, we found that copper modulates flotillin-2 association with cholesterol-rich lipid raft domains, and consequently Aβ synthesis is attenuated via copper-mediated inhibition of APP endocytosis. We also found that total cellular copper is associated inversely with lipid raft copper levels, so that under intracellular copper deficiency conditions, Aβ·copper complexes are more likely to form. This explains the paradoxical hypermetallation of Aβ with copper under tissue copper deficiency conditions in AD.Imbalance of metal ions has been recognized as one of the key factors in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD).² Aberrant interactions between copper or zinc with the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) released into the glutamatergic synaptic cleft vicinity could result in the formation of toxic Aβ oligomers and aggregation into plaques characteristic of AD brains (reviewed in Ref. 1). Copper, iron, and zinc are highly concentrated in extracellular plaques (2, 3), and yet brain tissues from AD (4–6) and human β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice (7–10) are paradoxically copper deficient compared with age-matched controls. Elevation of intracellular copper levels by genetic, dietary, and pharmacological manipulations in both AD transgenic animal and cell culture models is able to attenuate Aβ production (7, 9, 11–15). However, the underlying mechanism is at present unclear.Abnormal cholesterol metabolism is also a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of AD. Hypercholesterolemia increases the risk of developing AD-like pathology in a transgenic mouse model (16). Epidemiological and animal model studies show that a hypercholesterolemic diet is associated with Aβ accumulation and accelerated cognitive decline, both of which are further aggravated by high dietary copper (17, 18). In contrast, biochemical depletion of cholesterol using statins, inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, and methyl-β-cyclodextrin, a cholesterol sequestering agent, inhibit Aβ production in animal and cell culture models (19–25).Cholesterol is enriched in lipid rafts, membrane microdomains implicated in Aβ generation from APP cleavage by β- and γ-secretases. Recruitment of BACE1 (β-secretase) into lipid rafts increases the production of sAPP_β and Aβ (23, 26). The β-secretase-cleaved APP C-terminal fragment (β-CTF), and γ-secretase, a multiprotein complex composed of presenilin (PS1 or PS2), nicastrin (Nct), PEN-2 and APH-1, colocalize to lipid rafts (27). The accumulation of Aβ in lipid rafts isolated from AD and APP transgenic mice brains (28) provided further evidence that cholesterol plays a role in APP processing and Aβ generation.Currently, copper and cholesterol have been reported to modulate APP processing independently. However, evidence indicates that, despite tissue copper deficiency, Aβ·Cu²⁺ complexes form in AD that catalytically oxidize cholesterol and lipid to generate H₂O₂ and lipid peroxides (e.g. hydroxynonenal and malondialdehyde), which contribute to oxidative damage observed in AD (29–35). The underlying mechanism leading to the formation of pathological Aβ·Cu²⁺ complexes is unknown. In this study, we show that copper alters the structure of lipid rafts, and attenuates Aβ synthesis in lipid rafts by inhibition of APP endocytosis. We also identify a paradoxical inverse relationship between total cellular copper levels and copper distribution to lipid rafts, which appear to possess a privileged pool of copper where Aβ is more likely to interact with Cu²⁺ under copper-deficiency conditions to form Aβ·Cu²⁺ complexes. These data provide a novel mechanism by which cellular copper deficiency in AD could foster an environment for potentially adverse interactions between Aβ, copper, and cholesterol in lipid rafts.     

Lipid Protein Interactions Couple Protonation to Conformation in a Conserved Cytosolic Domain of G Protein-coupled Receptors

The visual photoreceptor rhodopsin is a prototypical class I (rhodopsin-like) G protein-coupled receptor. Photoisomerization of the covalently bound ligand 11-cis-retinal leads to restructuring of the cytosolic face of rhodopsin. The ensuing protonation of Glu-134 in the class-conserved D(E)RY motif at the C-terminal end of transmembrane helix-3 promotes the formation of the G protein-activating state. Using transmembrane segments derived from helix-3 of bovine rhodopsin, we show that lipid protein interactions play a key role in this cytosolic “proton switch.” Infrared and fluorescence spectroscopic pK_a determinations reveal that the D(E)RY motif is an autonomous functional module coupling side chain neutralization to conformation and helix positioning as evidenced by side chain to lipid headgroup Foerster resonance energy transfer. The free enthalpies of helix stabilization and hydrophobic burial of the neutral carboxyl shift the side chain pK_a into the range typical of Glu-134 in photoactivated rhodopsin. The lipid-mediated coupling mechanism is independent of interhelical contacts allowing its conservation without interference with the diversity of ligand-specific interactions in class I G protein-coupled receptors.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)² are hepta-helical membrane proteins that couple a large variety of extracellular signals to cell-specific responses via activation of G proteins. In the visual photoreceptor rhodopsin, a prototypical class I GPCR (1, 2), molecular activation processes can be monitored in real time by spectroscopic assays and analyzed in the context of several crystal structures (3–8). The primary signal for rhodopsin is the 11-cis to all-trans photoisomerization of retinal covalently bound to the apoprotein opsin through a protonated Schiff base to Lys²⁹⁶. Current models converge toward a picture in which “microdomains” act as conformational switches that are coupled to different degrees to the primary activation process. Two activating “proton switches” have been identified (9) as follows: breakage of an intramolecular salt bridge (10) by transfer of the Schiff base proton to its counter ion Glu-113 (11) is followed by movement of helix-6 (H6) (12, 13) in the metarhodopsin II_a (MII_a) to MII_b transition. The MII_b state takes up a proton at Glu-134 (14) in the class-conserved D(E)RY motif at the C-terminal end of helix-3 (H3) leading to the MII_bH⁺ intermediate (15, 16), which activates transducin (G_t), the G protein of the photoreceptor cell. Glu-134 regulates the pH sensitivity of receptor signaling (17) in membranes as reviewed previously (18), and in complex with G_t the protonated state of the carboxyl group becomes stabilized (19). This charge alteration is linked to the release of an “ionic lock,” originally described for the β₂-adrenergic receptor (20), which also in rhodopsin stabilizes the inactive state (16) through interactions between the cytosolic ends of H3 and H6 (21).In the absence of a lipidic bilayer, proton uptake and H6 movement become uncoupled (15). Lipidic composition affects MII formation, rhodopsin structure, and oligomerization (22–24) and differs at the rhodopsin membrane interface from the bulk lipidic phase (25). Likewise, MII formation specifically affects lipid structure (26). Although of fundamental importance for GPCR activation, the potential implication of lipid protein interactions in “proton switching” is not clear. A functional role of Glu-134 in lipid interactions has been originally derived from IR spectra where E134Q replacement abolished changes of lipid headgroup vibrations in the MIIG_t complex (19). Computational approaches emphasized the “strategic” location of the D(E)RY motif (27), and the Glu-134 carboxyl pK_a may critically depend on the lipid protein interface (28). However, the implications for proton switching are not evident, and the theoretical interest is contrasted by the lack of experimental data addressing the effect of the lipidic phase on side chain protonation, secondary structure, and membrane topology of the D(E)RY motif.We have studied the coupling between conformation and protonation in single transmembrane segments derived from H3 of bovine rhodopsin. We have assessed the “modular” function of the D(E)RY motif by determining parameters not evident from the crystal structures, i.e. the pK_a of the conserved carboxyl, its linkage to helical structure, and the effect of protonation on side chain to lipid headgroup distance. We show that the D(E)RY motif encodes an autonomous “proton switch” controlling side chain exposure and helix formation in the low dielectric of a lipidic phase. The data ascribe a functional role to lipid protein interactions that couple the chemical potential of protons to an activity-promoting GPCR conformation in a ligand-independent manner.     

Printor, a Novel TorsinA-interacting Protein Implicated in Dystonia Pathogenesis

Early onset generalized dystonia (DYT1) is an autosomal dominant neurological disorder caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue (torsinA ΔE) in the C-terminal region of the AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) protein torsinA. The pathogenic mechanism by which torsinA ΔE mutation leads to dystonia remains unknown. Here we report the identification and characterization of a 628-amino acid novel protein, printor, that interacts with torsinA. Printor co-distributes with torsinA in multiple brain regions and co-localizes with torsinA in the endoplasmic reticulum. Interestingly, printor selectively binds to the ATP-free form but not to the ATP-bound form of torsinA, supporting a role for printor as a cofactor rather than a substrate of torsinA. The interaction of printor with torsinA is completely abolished by the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutation. Our findings suggest that printor is a new component of the DYT1 pathogenic pathway and provide a potential molecular target for therapeutic intervention in dystonia.Early onset generalized torsion dystonia (DYT1) is the most common and severe form of hereditary dystonia, a movement disorder characterized by involuntary movements and sustained muscle spasms (1). This autosomal dominant disease has childhood onset and its dystonic symptoms are thought to result from neuronal dysfunction rather than neurodegeneration (2, 3). Most DYT1 cases are caused by deletion of a single glutamate residue at positions 302 or 303 (torsinA ΔE) of the 332-amino acid protein torsinA (4). In addition, a different torsinA mutation that deletes amino acids Phe³²³–Tyr³²⁸ (torsinA Δ323–328) was identified in a single family with dystonia (5), although the pathogenic significance of this torsinA mutation is unclear because these patients contain a concomitant mutation in another dystonia-related protein, ϵ-sarcoglycan (6). Recently, genetic association studies have implicated polymorphisms in the torsinA gene as a genetic risk factor in the development of adult-onset idiopathic dystonia (7, 8).TorsinA contains an N-terminal endoplasmic reticulum (ER)³ signal sequence and a 20-amino acid hydrophobic region followed by a conserved AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) domain (9, 10). Because members of the AAA⁺ family are known to facilitate conformational changes in target proteins (11, 12), it has been proposed that torsinA may function as a molecular chaperone (13, 14). TorsinA is widely expressed in brain and multiple other tissues (15) and is primarily associated with the ER and nuclear envelope (NE) compartments in cells (16–20). TorsinA is believed to mainly reside in the lumen of the ER and NE (17–19) and has been shown to bind lamina-associated polypeptide 1 (LAP1) (21), lumenal domain-like LAP1 (LULL1) (21), and nesprins (22). In addition, recent evidence indicates that a significant pool of torsinA exhibits a topology in which the AAA⁺ domain faces the cytoplasm (20). In support of this topology, torsinA is found in the cytoplasm, neuronal processes, and synaptic terminals (2, 3, 15, 23–26) and has been shown to bind cytosolic proteins snapin (27) and kinesin light chain 1 (20). TorsinA has been proposed to play a role in several cellular processes, including dopaminergic neurotransmission (28–31), NE organization and dynamics (17, 22, 32), and protein trafficking (27, 33). However, the precise biological function of torsinA and its regulation remain unknown.To gain insights into torsinA function, we performed yeast two-hybrid screens to search for torsinA-interacting proteins in the brain. We report here the isolation and characterization of a novel protein named printor (protein interactor of torsinA) that interacts selectively with wild-type (WT) torsinA but not the dystonia-associated torsinA ΔE mutant. Our data suggest that printor may serve as a cofactor of torsinA and provide a new molecular target for understanding and treating dystonia.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

Repeated Domains of Leptospira Immunoglobulin-like Proteins Interact with Elastin and Tropoelastin

Leptospira spp., the causative agents of leptospirosis, adhere to components of the extracellular matrix, a pivotal role for colonization of host tissues during infection. Previously, we and others have shown that Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins (Lig) of Leptospira spp. bind to fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and fibrinogen. In this study, we report that Leptospira can be immobilized by human tropoelastin (HTE) or elastin from different tissues, including lung, skin, and blood vessels, and that Lig proteins can bind to HTE or elastin. Moreover, both elastin and HTE bind to the same LigB immunoglobulin-like domains, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12 as demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and competition ELISAs. The LigB immunoglobulin-like domain binds to the 17th to 27th exons of HTE (17–27HTE) as determined by ELISA (LigBCon4, K_D = 0.50 μm; LigBCen7′–8, K_D = 0.82 μm; LigBCen9, K_D = 1.54 μm; and LigBCen12, K_D = 0.73 μm). The interaction of LigBCon4 and 17–27HTE was further confirmed by steady state fluorescence spectroscopy (K_D = 0.49 μm) and ITC (K_D = 0.54 μm). Furthermore, the binding was enthalpy-driven and affected by environmental pH, indicating it is a charge-charge interaction. The binding affinity of LigBCon4D341N to 17–27HTE was 4.6-fold less than that of wild type LigBCon4. In summary, we show that Lig proteins of Leptospira spp. interact with elastin and HTE, and we conclude this interaction may contribute to Leptospira adhesion to host tissues during infection.Pathogenic Leptospira spp. are spirochetes that cause leptospirosis, a serious infectious disease of people and animals (1, 2). Weil syndrome, the severe form of leptospiral infection, leads to multiorgan damage, including liver failure (jaundice), renal failure (nephritis), pulmonary hemorrhage, meningitis, abortion, and uveitis (3, 4). Furthermore, this disease is not only prevalent in many developing countries, it is reemerging in the United States (3). Although leptospirosis is a serious worldwide zoonotic disease, the pathogenic mechanisms of Leptospira infection remain enigmatic. Recent breakthroughs in applying genetic tools to Leptospira may facilitate studies on the molecular pathogenesis of leptospirosis (5–8).The attachment of pathogenic Leptospira spp. to host tissues is critical in the early phase of Leptospira infection. Leptospira spp. adhere to host tissues to overcome mechanical defense systems at tissue surfaces and to initiate colonization of specific tissues, such as the lung, kidney, and liver. Leptospira invade hosts tissues through mucous membranes or injured epidermis, coming in contact with subepithelial tissues. Here, certain bacterial outer surface proteins serve as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)² to mediate the binding of bacteria to different extracellular matrices (ECMs) of host cells (9). Several leptospiral MSCRAMMs have been identified (10–18), and we speculate that more will be identified in the near future.Lig proteins are distributed on the outer surface of pathogenic Leptospira, and the expression of Lig protein is only found in low passage strains (14, 16, 17), probably induced by environmental cues such as osmotic or temperature changes (19). Lig proteins can bind to fibrinogen and a variety of ECMs, including fibronectin (Fn), laminin, and collagen, thereby mediating adhesion to host cells (20–23). Lig proteins also constitute good vaccine candidates (24–26).Elastin is a component of ECM critical to tissue elasticity and resilience and is abundant in skin, lung, blood vessels, placenta, uterus, and other tissues (27–29). Tropoelastin is the soluble precursor of elastin (28). During the major phase of elastogenesis, multiple tropoelastin molecules associate through coacervation (30–32). Because of the abundance of elastin or tropoelastin on the surface of host cells, several bacterial MSCRAMMs use elastin and/or tropoelastin to mediate adhesion during the infection process (33–35).Because leptospiral infection is known to cause severe pulmonary hemorrhage (36, 37) and abortion (38), we hypothesize that some leptospiral MSCRAMMs may interact with elastin and/or tropoelastin in these elastin-rich tissues. This is the first report that Lig proteins of Leptospira interact with elastin and tropoelastin, and the interactions are mediated by several specific immunoglobulin-like domains of Lig proteins, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12, which bind to the 17th to 27th exons of human tropoelastin (HTE).     

The Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus Sortase-Substrate Complex Reveals How the Universally Conserved LPXTG Sorting Signal Is Recognized

In Gram-positive bacteria, sortase enzymes assemble surface proteins and pili in the cell wall envelope. Sortases catalyze a transpeptidation reaction that joins a highly conserved LPXTG sorting signal within their polypeptide substrate to the cell wall or to other pilin subunits. The molecular basis of transpeptidation and sorting signal recognition are not well understood, because the intermediates of catalysis are short lived. We have overcome this problem by synthesizing an analog of the LPXTG signal whose stable covalent complex with the enzyme mimics a key thioacyl catalytic intermediate. Here we report the solution structure and dynamics of its covalent complex with the Staphylococcus aureus SrtA sortase. In marked contrast to a previously reported crystal structure, we show that SrtA adaptively recognizes the LPXTG sorting signal by closing and immobilizing an active site loop. We have also used chemical shift mapping experiments to localize the binding site for the triglycine portion of lipid II, the second substrate to which surface proteins are attached. We propose a unified model of the transpeptidation reaction that explains the functions of key active site residues. Since the sortase-catalyzed anchoring reaction is required for the virulence of a number of bacterial pathogens, the results presented here may facilitate the development of new anti-infective agents.Bacterial surface proteins function as virulence factors that enable pathogens to adhere to sites of infection, evade the immune response, acquire essential nutrients, and enter host cells (1). Gram-positive bacteria use a common mechanism to covalently attach proteins to the cell wall. This process is catalyzed by sortase transpeptidase enzymes, which join proteins bearing a highly conserved Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X is any amino acid) sorting signal to the cross-bridge peptide of the peptidylglycan (2–4). Sortases also polymerize proteins containing sorting signals into pili, filamentous surface exposed structures that promote bacterial adhesion (5, 6). The search for small molecule sortase inhibitors is an active area of research, since these enzymes contribute to the virulence of a number of important pathogens, including among others Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae (reviewed in Refs. 7 and 8). Sortase enzymes are also promising molecular biology reagents that can be used to site-specifically attach proteins to a variety of biomolecules (9–14, 72).The sortase A (SrtA)⁷ enzyme from S. aureus is the prototypical member of the sortase enzyme family (15, 16). It anchors proteins to the murein sacculus that possess a COOH-terminal cell wall sorting signal that consists of a LPXTG motif, followed by a hydrophobic segment of amino acids and a tail composed of mostly positively charged residues (17). SrtA is located on the extracellular side of the membrane. After partial secretion of its protein substrate across the cell membrane, SrtA cleaves the LPXTG motif between the threonine and glycine residues, forming a thioacyl-linked protein-sortase intermediate (16). It then catalyzes the formation of an amide bond between the carboxyl group of the threonine and the cell wall precursor molecule lipid II (undecaprenyl-pyrophosphate-MurNAc(-l-Ala-d-iGln-l-Lys(NH₂-Gly₅)-d-Ala-d-Ala)-β1–4-GlcNAc)), creating a protein-lipid II-linked product that is incorporated into the peptidylglycan via the transglycosylation and transpeptidation reactions of bacterial cell wall synthesis (18–20). Over 900 sortase-attached proteins in 72 different strains of bacteria have thus far been identified (21, 22). The vast majority of these proteins contain a COOH-terminal sorting signal harboring an LPXTG motif and are anchored to the cell wall by enzymes closely related to SrtA.In vitro studies of SrtA have begun to define the mechanism of transpeptidation. SrtA consists of two parts: an unstructured amino-terminal tail that contains a stretch of nonpolar residues that embed it in the membrane and an autonomously folded catalytic domain that competently performs the transpeptidation reaction in vitro (SrtA_ΔN59, residues 60–206) (16, 23–25). Catalysis occurs through a ping-pong mechanism that is initiated when the thiol group of amino acid Cys¹⁸⁴ nucleophilically attacks the carbonyl carbon of the threonine residue within the LPXTG sorting signal (16, 23–25). This forms a transient tetrahedral intermediate that, upon breakage of the threonine-glycine peptide bond, rearranges into a more stable thioacyl enzyme-substrate linkage. SrtA then joins the terminal amine group within the pentaglycine branch of lipid II to the carbonyl carbon of the threonine, creating a second tetrahedral intermediate that is resolved into the lipid II-linked protein product (23).Sortase enzymes contain three conserved residues within their active sites: His¹²⁰, Cys¹⁸⁴, and Arg¹⁹⁷ (SrtA numbering). These residues play a critical role in catalysis, since their mutation in SrtA causes severe reductions in enzyme activity (16, 26–30). Although it is well established that Cys¹⁸⁴ forms a covalent linkage to the sorting signal, the functions of His¹²⁰ and Arg¹⁹⁷ are controversial. A variety of disparate functions have been ascribed to Arg¹⁹⁷. These include deprotonating Cys¹⁸⁴ (28), deprotonating lipid II (31), or stabilizing the binding of either the LPXTG sorting signal (28, 32) or oxyanion intermediates (31, 32). Different functions have also been proposed for His¹²⁰. Originally, it was suggested that it activated Cys¹⁸⁴ by forming an imidazolium-thiolate ion pair (26). However, subsequent pK_a measurements revealed that both His¹²⁰ and Cys¹⁸⁴ are predominantly uncharged at physiological pH values, leading to the suggestion that His¹²⁰ functions as a general base during catalysis (33). Most recently, it has been proposed that the most active form of the enzyme contains His¹²⁰ and Cys¹⁸⁴ in their charged states but that only a small fraction of SrtA exists in this form (∼0.06%) prior to binding to the sorting signal (25).NMR and crystal structures of SrtA_ΔN59 have revealed that it adopts an eight-stranded β-barrel fold (31, 34). Other sortase enzymes have also been shown to possess a similar overall structure, including SrtB from S. aureus (27, 35), SrtB from Bacillus anthracis (27, 36), SrtA from S. pyogenes (37), and the SrtC-1 and SrtC-3 enzymes from S. pneumoniae (38). However, the molecular basis of substrate recognition remains poorly understood, because all of the structures reported to date have not contained a sorting signal bound to the enzyme. The lone exception is the crystal structure of SrtA_ΔN59 bound to an LPETG peptide (31). However, in this structure the peptide substrate is bound nonspecifically (see below) (32, 39).In this paper, we report the structure and dynamics of SrtA covalently bound to an analog of the LPXTG sorting signal. The structure of the complex resembles the thioacyl intermediate of catalysis, providing insights into the molecular basis of binding of the LPXTG sorting signal and the functions of key active site residues. Notably, the mechanism of substrate binding visualized in the NMR structure differs substantially from a previously reported crystal structure of SrtA_ΔN59 non-covalently bound to a LPETG peptide (31). We have also used NMR chemical shift mapping experiments to localize the binding site for a triglycine cell wall substrate analog. A mechanism of transpeptidation compatible with these new data is proposed.     

A Degenerate Cohort of Yeast Membrane Trafficking DUBs Mediates Cell Polarity and Survival*

Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), cysteine or metallo- proteases that cleave ubiquitin chains or protein conjugates, are present in nearly every cellular compartment, with overlapping protein domain structure, localization, and functions. We discovered a cohort of DUBs that are involved in membrane trafficking (ubp4, ubp5, ubp9, ubp15, and sst2) and found that loss of all five of these DUBs but not loss of any combination of four, significantly impacted cell viability in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (1). Here, we delineate the collective and individual functions and activities of these five conserved DUBs using comparative proteomics, biochemistry, and microscopy. We find these five DUBs are degenerate rather than redundant at the levels of cell morphology, substrate selectivity, ubiquitin chain specificity, and cell viability under stress. These studies reveal the complexity of interplay among these enzymes, providing a foundation for understanding DUB biology and providing another example of how cells utilize degeneracy to improve survival.Eukaryotic cells integrate signaling pathways to modulate their response to environmental changes, predominately through dynamic protein posttranslational modifications like ubiquitination (Ub''n) (2, 3). Cycles of Ub''n modulate protein stability, localization, and/or binding partners while maintaining cellular ubiquitin (Ub) homeostasis (3). Ub''n of substrate proteins is catalyzed by a linear sequence of enzymes (E1, E2, E3) and reversed by deubiquitinases (DUBs¹). Ub chains can be formed through any of Ub''s seven lysines (K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, K63) or its N terminus (M1), generating a wide variety of Ub chain architectures that mediate specific cellular signals (4, 5). DUBs have been implicated in multiple essential cellular roles, including chromatin remodeling, DNA damage repair, kinase activation, endocytosis, ribosomal maturation, and immune responses (2, 3).Surprisingly, while multiple Ub''n enzymes (E1, E2, and E3) are essential in yeast (6–8), only a single DUB is essential for viability of both budding and fission yeasts (6–11), suggesting that considerable functional overlap may exist in yeast under standard laboratory conditions. In contrast, in metazoans, knockdown or loss of individual DUBs often results in developmental defects or disease states (3, 12, 13). Consistent with this possibility, we previously found that loss of five DUBs (5DUB delete: ubp4Δ1 ubp5Δ ubp9Δ ubp15Δ sst2Δ) but not any combination of four intracellular membrane trafficking DUBs significantly impacted cell polarity, Ub conjugate accumulation, and viability in S. pombe (1). To begin to make sense of this functional overlap, here we dissected the shared and specific functions of these five DUBs on multiple levels, defining their contributions to cell polarity, Ub chain specificities, shared and specific putative substrates, and individual and combined effects of DUB loss on cell survival under stress. We find that this cohort of five DUBs is degenerate (different elements that have overlapping but not fully redundant roles), forming a robust functional module for maintenance of cell polarity and viability.     

Interaction of TorsinA with Its Major Binding Partners Is Impaired by the Dystonia-associated ��GAG Deletion

Early onset (DYT1) torsion dystonia is a dominantly inherited movement disorder associated with a three-base pair (ΔGAG) deletion that removes a glutamic acid residue from the protein torsinA. TorsinA is an essential AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) ATPase found in the endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope of higher eukaryotes, but what it does and how changes caused by the ΔGAG deletion lead to dystonia are not known. Here, we asked how the DYT1 mutation affects association of torsinA with interacting proteins. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we first established that the related transmembrane proteins LULL1 and LAP1 are prominent binding partners for torsinA in U2OS cells. Comparative analysis demonstrates that these two proteins are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum or nuclear envelope by their divergent N-terminal domains. Binding of torsinA to their C-terminal lumenal domains is stabilized when residues in any one of three motifs implicated in ATP hydrolysis (Walker B, sensor 1, and sensor 2) are mutated. Importantly, the ΔGAG deletion does not stabilize this binding. Indeed, deleting the ΔGAG encoded glutamic acid residue from any of the three ATP hydrolysis mutants destabilizes their association with LULL1 and LAP1C, suggesting a possible basis for loss of torsinA function. Impaired interaction of torsinA with LULL1 and/or LAP1 may thus contribute to the development of dystonia.TorsinA is the causative protein in early onset torsion dystonia, also known as DYT1 dystonia or Oppenheim Disease (1). The disease is characterized by severe and generalized abnormalities in motor control that typically begin during childhood (2). DYT1 dystonia is an autosomal dominant disorder associated with a three-base pair (ΔGAG) deletion that removes one of a pair of glutamic acid residues (Glu-302/303) from near the C terminus of torsinA (3). We will refer to this mutant protein as torsinAΔE. TorsinA is expressed throughout the body, although its levels vary in different cell types and over the course of development (1, 4). TorsinA is an essential protein in the mouse, because Tor1A^−/− mice die within a few hours of birth (5, 6). Because knock-in of torsinAΔE does not rescue these mice from perinatal lethality (5, 6), the disease-linked deletion is considered to be a loss-of-function mutation.The cellular functions potentially ascribed to torsinA vary widely, but in general remain poorly understood. TorsinA resides within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)² and contiguous nuclear envelope (NE) (7–10). Based on its membership in the AAA⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) family of ATPases (1, 11) and the protein disaggregating activity of the most closely related AAA⁺ protein ClpB/Hsp104, it seems likely that torsinA disassembles protein complexes or otherwise changes the conformation of proteins in the ER or NE. However, protein complexes acted upon by torsinA remain elusive, and definitive demonstration of torsinA activity is still lacking (12, 13). The NE is the favored binding site for a hydrolysis-deficient “substrate trap” torsinA mutant (14), and both expression of this substrate trap mutant and removal of torsinA by gene deletion perturb NE structure (5, 14). These observations point to a significant role for torsinA in regulating protein complexes within the NE. A candidate-based screen to determine whether any of a set of known NE proteins associate with torsinA uncovered an interaction with the inner nuclear membrane protein LAP1 (also known as TOR1AIP1) and a related protein in the ER, LULL1 (also known as TOR1AIP2 or NET9) (15). Nesprin-3, a resident of the outer nuclear membrane implicated in connecting the nucleus to the cytoskeleton, is another NE protein recently reported to interact with torsinA (16).TorsinA has also been implicated in regulating the secretory pathway (17–20) and in modulating cellular responses to such insults as oxidative stress or aggregated proteins (21–23). Most studies of these effects have focused on differences between expressing wild-type torsinA and torsinAΔE. In a particularly striking set of studies, overexpressing torsinAΔE selectively impaired efflux of a secreted luciferase from cells (19). Importantly, this inhibitory effect was also seen in DYT1 patient-derived fibroblasts (with one copy of the gene encoding torsinAΔE), and in this setting could be overcome by RNA interference-mediated removal of the mutant protein (20). Although it remains to be determined exactly how the ΔE deletion changes torsinA structure and function (see Refs. 24 and 25 for structural modeling), these results, together with its inability to rescue function in knock-in mice (5, 6), suggest that the torsinAΔE mutation causes both loss- and gain-of-function changes in torsinA, potentially explaining the autosomal dominant inheritance of DYT1 dystonia.In the present study, we wanted to better understand the molecular basis for functional changes caused by the ΔGAG glutamic acid (ΔE) deletion. We began by identifying de novo torsinA interacting proteins in the cultured human U2OS cell line. After finding that the previously discovered transmembrane proteins LULL1 and LAP1 were the prominent binding partners in these cells (15), we proceeded to further characterize their interaction with torsinA and to explore how this is affected by the ΔE deletion. Our findings indicate that impaired or destabilized binding of torsinAΔE to LULL1 and LAP1 could provide a molecular explanation for a loss of function that contributes to DYT1 dystonia.     

Aldo-keto Reductase Family 1 Member B10 Promotes Cell Survival by Regulating Lipid Synthesis and Eliminating Carbonyls

Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) is primarily expressed in the normal human colon and small intestine but overexpressed in liver and lung cancer. Our previous studies have shown that AKR1B10 mediates the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase-α. In this study, we demonstrate that AKR1B10 is critical to cell survival. In human colon carcinoma cells (HCT-8) and lung carcinoma cells (NCI-H460), small-interfering RNA-induced AKR1B10 silencing resulted in caspase-3-mediated apoptosis. In these cells, the total and subspecies of cellular lipids, particularly of phospholipids, were decreased by more than 50%, concomitant with 2–3-fold increase in reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial cytochrome c efflux, and caspase-3 cleavage. AKR1B10 silencing also increased the levels of α,β-unsaturated carbonyls, leading to the 2–3-fold increase of cellular lipid peroxides. Supplementing the HCT-8 cells with palmitic acid (80 μm), the end product of fatty acid synthesis, partially rescued the apoptosis induced by AKR1B10 silencing, whereas exposing the HCT-8 cells to epalrestat, an AKR1B10 inhibitor, led to more than 2-fold elevation of the intracellular lipid peroxides, resulting in apoptosis. These data suggest that AKR1B10 affects cell survival through modulating lipid synthesis, mitochondrial function, and oxidative status, as well as carbonyl levels, being an important cell survival protein.Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10,² also designated aldose reductase-like-1, ARL-1) is primarily expressed in the human colon, small intestine, and adrenal gland, with a low level in the liver (1–3). However, this protein is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma, cervical cancer, lung squamous cell carcinoma, and lung adenocarcinoma in smokers, being a potential diagnostic and/or prognostic marker (1, 2, 4–6).The biological function of AKR1B10 in the intestine and adrenal gland, as well as its role in tumor development and progression, remains unclear. AKR1B10 is a monomeric enzyme that efficiently catalyzes the reduction to corresponding alcohols of a range of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes and ketones, including highly electrophilic α,β-unsaturated carbonyls and antitumor drugs containing carbonyl groups, with NADPH as a co-enzyme (1, 7–12). The electrophilic carbonyls are constantly produced by lipid peroxidation, particularly in oxidative conditions, and are highly cytotoxic; through interaction with proteins, peptides, and DNA, the carbonyls cause protein dysfunction and DNA damage (breaks and mutations), resulting in mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, or apoptosis (10, 13–19). AKR1B10 also shows strong enzymatic activity toward all-trans-retinal, 9-cis-retinal, and 13-cis-retinal, reducing them to the corresponding retinols, which may regulate the intracellular retinoic acid, a signaling molecule modulating cell proliferation and differentiation (6, 20–23). In lung cancer, AKR1B10 expression is correlated with the patient smoking history and activates procarcinogens in cigarette smoke, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, thus involved in lung tumorigenesis (24–26).Recent studies have shown that in breast cancer cells, AKR1B10 associates with acetyl-CoA carboxylase-α (ACCA) and blocks its ubiquitination and proteasome degradation (27). ACCA is a rate-limiting enzyme of de novo synthesis of long chain fatty acids, catalyzing the ATP-dependent carboxylation of acetyl-CoA to form malonyl-CoA (28). Long chain fatty acids are the building blocks of biomembranes and the precursor of lipid second messengers, playing a critical role in cell growth and proliferation (29, 30). Therefore, ACCA activity is tightly regulated by both metabolite-mediated allosteric mechanisms and phosphorylation-dependent mechanisms; the latter are controlled by multiple hormones, such as insulin, glucagon, and growth factors (31–33). ACCA activity is also regulated through physical protein-protein interaction. For instance, breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) protein associates with the ACCA and blocks its Ser⁷⁹ residue from dephosphorylation (34, 35). The AKR1B10-mediated regulation on ACCA stability represents a novel regulatory mechanism, and this current study elucidated the biological significance of this regulation. The results show that AKR1B10 promotes cell survival via modulating lipid synthesis, mitochondrial function and oxidative stress, and carbonyl levels.     

Electrochemical Measurement of Electron Transfer Kinetics by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 can respire using carbon electrodes and metal oxyhydroxides as electron acceptors, requiring mechanisms for transferring electrons from the cell interior to surfaces located beyond the cell. Although purified outer membrane cytochromes will reduce both electrodes and metals, S. oneidensis also secretes flavins, which accelerate electron transfer to metals and electrodes. We developed techniques for detecting direct electron transfer by intact cells, using turnover and single turnover voltammetry. Metabolically active cells attached to graphite electrodes produced thin (submonolayer) films that demonstrated both catalytic and reversible electron transfer in the presence and absence of flavins. In the absence of soluble flavins, electron transfer occurred in a broad potential window centered at ∼0 V (versus standard hydrogen electrode), and was altered in single (ΔomcA, ΔmtrC) and double deletion (ΔomcA/ΔmtrC) mutants of outer membrane cytochromes. The addition of soluble flavins at physiological concentrations significantly accelerated electron transfer and allowed catalytic electron transfer to occur at lower applied potentials (−0.2 V). Scan rate analysis indicated that rate constants for direct electron transfer were slower than those reported for pure cytochromes (∼1 s⁻¹). These observations indicated that anodic current in the higher (>0 V) window is due to activation of a direct transfer mechanism, whereas electron transfer at lower potentials is enabled by flavins. The electrochemical dissection of these activities in living cells into two systems with characteristic midpoint potentials and kinetic behaviors explains prior observations and demonstrates the complementary nature of S. oneidensis electron transfer strategies.Respiratory electron flow typically occurs at the inner membrane, where oxidation and reduction can be easily linked to intracellular electron carriers and used to generate a membrane potential. However, when the electron acceptor or donor is insoluble, bacteria must possess a mechanism for transferring electrons beyond their inner membrane (1). This is especially true for Proteobcteria, which have an outer membrane that further insulates cytoplasmic and inner membrane processes from insoluble substrates. Metal oxides (such as Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxyhydroxides) are well recognized naturally occurring electron acceptors that demand such an electron transfer strategy (2–4).Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, a metabolically versatile member of the gammaproteobacteria (5), is capable of reducing insoluble metals, and this phenotype has been linked to a collection of interacting multiheme cytochromes spanning the inner membrane, periplasmic space, and outer membrane (6–12). There is also evidence that some of these cytochromes decorate the surface of pili-like structures extending from the cell surface (13, 14). Regardless of the ultimate location of the cytochromes, in all models of electron transfer, electrons must hop from these proteins to a solid surface or be transferred to a soluble mediator that can diffuse to a final destination (15, 16). Although chelation of a metal oxide is a third option (17, 18), the fact that Shewanella is able to transfer electrons to solid graphite electrodes (19–23) underscores the need for a direct or diffusion-based electron transfer mechanism to link cellular proteins and surfaces.Recent work has shown that Shewanella species secrete soluble flavins (FMN and riboflavin) that facilitate electron transfer to both metals and electrodes (23, 24). For example, removal of accumulated soluble flavins decreases the rate of electron transfer by Shewanella biofilms to electrodes over 80%. Consistent with this observation, kinetic measurements with pure MtrC and OmcA (25) showed that direct reduction of solid metal oxides by these cytochromes was too slow to explain physiological rates of electron transfer, whereas turnover rates of these enzymes with soluble flavins were orders of magnitude larger. These studies suggest that the kinetics of electron transfer from cytochromes on the outer surface of Shewanella to electrodes will be significantly altered in the absence of diffusible mediators (9–11, 26–34).Voltammetry has proven a useful technique for the analysis of electron transfer rates and pathways using purified proteins (35–39) and has recently been extended to the study of intact bacteria (23, 40–42). In slow scan rate cyclic voltammetry, the rate of electron transfer from respiring Shewanella biofilms to electrodes rises sharply at the E°′ of riboflavin and FMN (−0.2 V versus SHE)² (23). Such measurements relating thermodynamic driving force to turnover kinetics would be difficult with whole cell:Fe(III) oxide incubations, which do not allow fine control over the electron acceptor redox potential or real time recording of electron transfer rates. In addition, voltammetry provides tools to observe electron movement under single-turnover conditions (in the absence of electron donor), allowing reversible oxidation and reduction of proteins accessible to the electrode and study of kinetic behavior (43, 44).In this work, techniques of turnover (sustained electron transfer from cells to electrode in the presence of electron donor) and single turnover (reversible oxidation and reduction in the absence of electron donor) voltammetry were harnessed to investigate the role of outer membrane proteins in electron transfer from Shewanella to electrodes. In all of these studies, intact metabolically active cells were used, along with electrode surfaces known to act as acceptors for Shewanella. The results in the absence of soluble mediators provide evidence that electron transfer between MtrC and OmcA and surfaces requires a higher potential compared with when flavins are present to shuttle electrons to the surface. Mutant analysis also demonstrates that cells possessing different outer membrane cytochromes have differing abilities for direct and mediator-enabled electron transfer.     

The Trehalose Pathway Regulates Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Content through Hexokinase 2 and cAMP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In yeast, trehalose is synthesized by a multimeric enzymatic complex: TPS1 encodes trehalose 6-phosphate synthase, which belongs to a complex that is composed of at least three other subunits, including trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase Tps2 and the redundant regulatory subunits Tps3 and Tsl1. The product of the TPS1 gene plays an essential role in the control of the glycolytic pathway by restricting the influx of glucose into glycolysis. In this paper, we investigated whether the trehalose synthesis pathway could be involved in the control of the other energy-generating pathway: oxidative phosphorylation. We show that the different mutants of the trehalose synthesis pathway (tps1Δ, tps2Δ, and tps1,2Δ) exhibit modulation in the amount of respiratory chains, in terms of cytochrome content and maximal respiratory activity. Furthermore, these variations in mitochondrial enzymatic content are positively linked to the intracellular concentration in cAMP that is modulated by Tps1p through hexokinase2. This is the first time that a pathway involved in sugar storage, i.e. trehalose, is shown to regulate the mitochondrial enzymatic content.The control of glycolysis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been extensively studied. First, allosteric regulation of the irreversible steps catalyzed by phosphofructokinase (1), pyruvate kinase (review in Ref. 2), and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (1) has been proposed, even though the overexpression of these key enzymes does not increase the glycolytic flux (3). Other mechanisms of control have been proposed such as futile cycle activity (4) and an inhibitory effect of ATP (5). Indeed, it seems likely that the regulation of glycolysis is a complex process involving different hierarchical events leading from gene expression to the metabolic fluxes via protein levels, enzyme activities, and metabolite effects (6, 7). Among these actors, the product of the TPS1 gene has been shown to play an essential role in the control of the glycolytic pathway by restricting the influx of glucose into glycolysis (8). TPS1 encodes trehalose 6-phosphate (Tre6P)³ synthase (9–12). This enzyme is part of a multimeric protein complex composed of at least three other subunits, i.e. Tre6P phosphatase encoded by TPS2 (13) and the redundant regulatory subunits Tps3 and Tsl1 (14).A particularly intriguing finding is that tps1Δ mutants are defective not only for Tre6P synthesis but also for growth on glucose or related rapidly fermented sugars (8, 11, 15). This may be explained by an uncontrolled influx of glucose into the glycolytic pathway. This phenomenon is characterized by hyperaccumulation of glucose 6-phosphate, fructose 6-phosphate, and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (Fru1,6bP) (8, 16–18) and depletion of ATP, P_i, and all intermediates of glycolysis downstream of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (19). Several mutations have been described that suppress the growth defect of tps1Δ mutants apparently by reducing sugar influx into glycolysis (16, 20) or by diverting the excess sugar phosphate into glycerol synthesis through overexpression of the GPD1-encoded NAD-dependent glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (17, 21). Reconstitution of ethanolic fermentation in permeabilized yeast spheroplasts indicated that in addition to Tre6P, the Tps1 protein itself also seems to play a role in restricting glucose influx into glycolysis (22).Whatever the mechanism by which the multimeric complex involved in trehalose synthesis controls glycolytic flux in yeast, such a regulation is associated with modification of the cellular content of sugar phosphates. Moreover, in a recent paper, we have shown that in yeast, low physiological concentrations of glucose 6-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate slightly (20%) stimulate the respiratory flux and that this effect was strongly antagonized by Fru1,6bP (18). On the other hand, Fru1,6bP by itself is able to inhibit mitochondrial respiration only in mitochondria isolated from a Crabtree-positive strain. Taken together, these results indicate that besides the thermodynamic link between glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration (i.e. the cytosolic ATP/ADP and NADH/NAD+ ratio), a kinetic control of oxidative phosphorylation activity is exerted by the level of glycolytic sugar phosphates (18, 23). This raises the question of a possible direct or indirect regulation of oxidative phosphorylation by the trehalose synthesis pathway.     

Deletion of the Chloride Transporter Slc26a7 Causes Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis and Impairs Gastric Acid Secretion

SLC26A7 (human)/Slc26a7 (mouse) is a recently identified chloride-base exchanger and/or chloride transporter that is expressed on the basolateral membrane of acid-secreting cells in the renal outer medullary collecting duct (OMCD) and in gastric parietal cells. Here, we show that mice with genetic deletion of Slc26a7 expression develop distal renal tubular acidosis, as manifested by metabolic acidosis and alkaline urine pH. In the kidney, basolateral Cl⁻/HCO₃⁻ exchange activity in acid-secreting intercalated cells in the OMCD was significantly decreased in hypertonic medium (a normal milieu for the medulla) but was reduced only mildly in isotonic medium. Changing from a hypertonic to isotonic medium (relative hypotonicity) decreased the membrane abundance of Slc26a7 in kidney cells in vivo and in vitro. In the stomach, stimulated acid secretion was significantly impaired in isolated gastric mucosa and in the intact organ. We propose that SLC26A7 dysfunction should be investigated as a potential cause of unexplained distal renal tubular acidosis or decreased gastric acid secretion in humans.The collecting duct segment of the distal kidney nephron plays a major role in systemic acid base homeostasis by acid secretion and bicarbonate absorption. The acid secretion occurs via H⁺-ATPase and H-K-ATPase into the lumen and bicarbonate is absorbed via basolateral Cl⁻/HCO₃⁻ exchangers (1–4). The tubules, which are located within the outer medullary region of the kidney collecting duct (OMCD),² have the highest rate of acid secretion among the distal tubule segments and are therefore essential to the maintenance of acid base balance (2).The gastric parietal cell is the site of generation of acid and bicarbonate through the action of cytosolic carbonic anhydrase II (5, 6). The intracellular acid is secreted into the lumen via gastric H-K-ATPase, which works in conjunction with a chloride channel and a K⁺ recycling pathway (7–10). The intracellular bicarbonate is transported to the blood via basolateral Cl⁻/HCO₃⁻ exchangers (11–14).SLC26 (human)/Slc26 (mouse) isoforms are members of a conserved family of anion transporters that display tissue-specific patterns of expression in epithelial cells (15–24). Several SLC26 members can function as chloride/bicarbonate exchangers. These include SLC26A3 (DRA), SLC26A4 (pendrin), SLC26A6 (PAT1 or CFEX), SLC26A7, and SLC26A9 (25–31). SLC26A7 and SLC26A9 can also function as chloride channels (32–34).SLC26A7/Slc26a7 is predominantly expressed in the kidney and stomach (28, 29). In the kidney, Slc26a7 co-localizes with AE1, a well-known Cl⁻/HCO₃⁻ exchanger, on the basolateral membrane of (acid-secreting) A-intercalated cells in OMCD cells (29, 35, 36) (supplemental Fig. 1). In the stomach, Slc26a7 co-localizes with AE2, a major Cl⁻/HCO₃⁻ exchanger, on the basolateral membrane of acid secreting parietal cells (28). To address the physiological function of Slc26a7 in the intact mouse, we have generated Slc26a7 ko mice. We report here that Slc26a7 ko mice exhibit distal renal tubular acidosis and impaired gastric acidification in the absence of morphological abnormalities in kidney or stomach.     

Pif1 Helicase Lengthens Some Okazaki Fragment Flaps Necessitating Dna2 Nuclease/Helicase Action in the Two-nuclease Processing Pathway

We have developed a system to reconstitute all of the proposed steps of Okazaki fragment processing using purified yeast proteins and model substrates. DNA polymerase δ was shown to extend an upstream fragment to displace a downstream fragment into a flap. In most cases, the flap was removed by flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), in a reaction required to remove initiator RNA in vivo. The nick left after flap removal could be sealed by DNA ligase I to complete fragment joining. An alternative pathway involving FEN1 and the nuclease/helicase Dna2 has been proposed for flaps that become long enough to bind replication protein A (RPA). RPA binding can inhibit FEN1, but Dna2 can shorten RPA-bound flaps so that RPA dissociates. Recent reconstitution results indicated that Pif1 helicase, a known component of fragment processing, accelerated flap displacement, allowing the inhibitory action of RPA. In results presented here, Pif1 promoted DNA polymerase δ to displace strands that achieve a length to bind RPA, but also to be Dna2 substrates. Significantly, RPA binding to long flaps inhibited the formation of the final ligation products in the reconstituted system without Dna2. However, Dna2 reversed that inhibition to restore efficient ligation. These results suggest that the two-nuclease pathway is employed in cells to process long flap intermediates promoted by Pif1.Eukaryotic cellular DNA is replicated semi-conservatively in the 5′ to 3′ direction. A leading strand is synthesized by DNA polymerase ϵ in a continuous manner in the direction of opening of the replication fork (1, 2). A lagging strand is synthesized by DNA polymerase δ (pol δ)³ in the opposite direction in a discontinuous manner, producing segments called Okazaki fragments (3). These stretches of ∼150 nucleotides (nt) must be joined together to create the continuous daughter strand. DNA polymerase α/primase (pol α) initiates each fragment by synthesizing an RNA/DNA primer consisting of ∼1-nt of RNA and ∼10–20 nt of DNA (4). The sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is loaded on the DNA by replication factor C (RFC). pol δ then complexes with PCNA and extends the primer. When pol δ reaches the 5′-end of the downstream Okazaki fragment, it displaces the end into a flap while continuing synthesis, a process known as strand displacement (5, 6). These flap intermediates are cleaved by nucleases to produce a nick for DNA ligase I (LigI) to seal, completing the DNA strand.In one proposed mechanism for flap processing, the only required nuclease is flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). pol δ displaces relatively short flaps, which are cleaved by FEN1 as they are created, leaving a nick for LigI (7–9). FEN1 binds at the 5′-end of the flap and tracks down the flap cleaving only at the base (5, 10, 11). Because pol δ favors the displacement of RNA-DNA hybrids over DNA-DNA hybrids, strand displacement generally is limited to that of the initiator RNA of an Okazaki fragment (12). In addition, the tightly coordinated action of pol δ and FEN1 also tends to keep flaps short. However, biochemical reconstitution studies demonstrate that some flaps can become long (13, 14). Once these flaps reach ∼30 nt, they can be bound by the eukaryotic single strand binding protein replication protein A (RPA) (15). Binding by RPA to a flap substrate inhibits cleavage by FEN1 (16). The RPA-bound flap would then require another mechanism for proper processing.This second mechanism is proposed to utilize Dna2 (16) in addition to FEN1. Dna2 is both a 5′-3′ helicase and an endonuclease (17, 18). Like FEN1, Dna2 recognizes 5′-flap structures, binding at the 5′-end of the flap and tracking downward toward the base (19, 20). Unlike FEN1, Dna2 cleaves the flap multiple times but not all the way to the base, such that a short flap remains (20). RPA binding to a flap has been shown to stimulate Dna2 cleavage (16). Therefore, if a flap becomes long enough to bind RPA, Dna2 binds and cleaves it to a length of 5–10 nucleotides from which RPA dissociates (21). FEN1 can then enter the flap, displace the Dna2, and then cleave at the base to make the nick for ligation (16, 18, 22). The need for this mechanism may be one reason why DNA2 is an essential gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (23, 24). It has been proposed that, in the absence of Dna2, flaps that become long enough to bind RPA cannot be properly processed, leading to genomic instability and cell death (23).In reconstitution of Okazaki fragment processing with purified proteins, even though some flaps became long enough to bind RPA, FEN1 was very effective at cleaving essentially all of the generated flaps (13, 14). Evidently, FEN1 could engage the flaps before binding of RPA. However, these reconstitution assays did not include the 5′-3′ helicase Pif1 (25, 26). Pif1 is involved in telomeric and mitochondrial DNA maintenance (26) and was first implicated in Okazaki fragment processing from genetic studies in S. cerevisiae. Deletion of PIF1 rescued the lethality of dna2Δ, although the double mutant was still temperature-sensitive (27). The authors of this report proposed that Pif1 creates a need for Dna2 by promoting longer flaps. Further supporting this conclusion, deletion of POL32, which encodes the subunit of pol δ that interacts with PCNA, rescued the temperature sensitivity of the dna2Δpif1Δ double mutant (12, 27). Importantly, pol δ exhibited reduced strand displacement activity when POL32 was deleted (12, 28, 29). The combination of pif1Δ and pol32Δ is believed to create a situation in which virtually no long flaps are formed, eliminating the requirement for Dna2 flap cleavage (27).We recently performed reconstitution assays showing that Pif1 can assist in the creation of long flaps. Inclusion of Pif1, in the absence of RPA, increased the proportion of flaps that lengthened to ∼28–32 nt before FEN1 cleavage (14). With the addition of RPA, the appearance of these long flap cleavage products was suppressed. Evidently, Pif1 promoted such rapid flap lengthening that RPA bound some flaps before FEN1 and inhibited cleavage. The RPA-bound flaps would presumably require cleavage by Dna2 for proper processing.Only a small fraction of flaps became long with Pif1. However, there are hundreds of thousands of Okazaki fragments processed per replication cycle (30). Therefore, thousands of flaps are expected to be lengthened by Pif1 in vivo, a number significant enough that improper processing of such flaps could lead to cell death.Our goal here was to determine whether Pif1 can influence the flow of Okazaki fragments through the two proposed pathways. We first questioned whether Pif1 stimulates strand displacement synthesis by pol δ. Next, we asked whether Pif1 lengthens short flaps so that Dna2 can bind and cleave. Finally, we used a complete reconstitution system to determine whether Pif1 promotes creation of RPA-bound flaps that require cleavage by both Dna2 and FEN1 before they can be ligated. Our results suggest that Pif1 promotes the two-nuclease pathway, and reveal the mechanisms involved.