Transforming Growth Factor-�� (TGF-��1) Activates TAK1 via TAB1-mediated Autophosphorylation, Independent of TGF-�� Receptor Kinase Activity in Mesangial Cells

Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is a multifunctional cytokine that signals through the interaction of type I (TβRI) and type II (TβRII) receptors to activate distinct intracellular pathways. TAK1 is a serine/threonine kinase that is rapidly activated by TGF-β1. However, the molecular mechanism of TAK1 activation is incompletely understood. Here, we propose a mechanism whereby TAK1 is activated by TGF-β1 in primary mouse mesangial cells. Under unstimulated conditions, endogenous TAK1 is stably associated with TβRI. TGF-β1 stimulation causes rapid dissociation from the receptor and induces TAK1 phosphorylation. Deletion mutant analysis indicates that the juxtamembrane region including the GS domain of TβRI is crucial for its interaction with TAK1. Both TβRI-mediated TAK1 phosphorylation and TGF-β1-induced TAK1 phosphorylation do not require kinase activity of TβRI. Moreover, TβRI-mediated TAK1 phosphorylation correlates with the degree of its association with TβRI and requires kinase activity of TAK1. TAB1 does not interact with TGF-β receptors, but TAB1 is indispensable for TGF-β1-induced TAK1 activation. We also show that TRAF6 and TAB2 are required for the interaction of TAK1 with TβRI and TGF-β1-induced TAK1 activation in mouse mesangial cells. Taken together, our data indicate that TGF-β1-induced interaction of TβRI and TβRII triggers dissociation of TAK1 from TβRI, and subsequently TAK1 is phosphorylated through TAB1-mediated autophosphorylation and not by the receptor kinase activity of TβRI.Members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)³ superfamily are key regulators of various biological processes such as cellular differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and wound healing (1, 2). TGF-β1, the prototype of TGF-β family, is a potent inducer of extracellular matrix synthesis and is well established as a central mediator in the final common pathway of fibrosis associated with progressive kidney diseases (3, 4). Upon ligand stimulation, TGF-β type I (TβRI) and type II (TβRII) receptors form heterotetrameric complexes, by which TβRI is phosphorylated in the GS domain and activated. Smad signaling pathway is well established as a canonical pathway induced by TGF-β1 (5, 6). Receptor-regulated Smads (Smad2 and Smad3) are recruited and activated by the activated TβRI. The phosphorylation in the GS domain (7) and L45 loop (8) of TβRI are crucial for its interaction with receptor-regulated Smads. After phosphorylation, receptor-regulated Smads are rapidly dissociated from TβRI and interact with common Smad (Smad4) followed by nuclear translocation. In addition to the Smad pathway, a recently emerging body of evidence has demonstrated that TGF-β1 also induces various Smad-independent signaling pathways (9–17) by which mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (18, 19), p38 MAPK (20–22), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (23, 24) can be activated by TGF-β1.TAK1, initially identified as a MAPK kinase kinase 7 (MKKK7 or MAP3K7) in the TGF-β signaling pathway (11, 12), also can be activated by environmental stress (25), proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α (26, 27) and lipopolysaccharide (28). For TAK1 activation, phosphorylation at Thr-187 and Ser-192 in the activation loop of TAK1 is essentially required (29–31). TAK1 can transduce signals to several downstream signaling cascades, including the MAPK kinase (MKK) 4/7-JNK cascade, MKK3/6-p38 MAPK cascade, and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB)-inducing kinase-IκB kinase cascade (26–28). A recent report has shown that TAK1 is also activated by agonists of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) and ischemia, which in turn activates the LKB1/AMPK pathway, a pivotal energy-sensor pathway (32). TAK1 is also involved in Wnt signaling (33). We and others have previously demonstrated that TAK1 is a major mediator of TGF-β1-induced type I collagen and fibronectin expression through activation of the MKK3-p38 MAPK and MKK4-JNK signaling cascades, respectively (34–37). Furthermore, increased expression and activation of TAK1 enhance p38 phosphorylation and promote interstitial fibrosis in the myocardium from 9-day-old TAK1 transgenic mice (37). These data implicate a crucial role of TAK1 in extracellular matrix production and tissue fibrosis. TAK1 is also implicated in regulation of cell cycle (38), cell apoptosis (39–41), and the Smad signaling pathway (42–44). Thus, TAK1 may function as an important regulator and mediator of TGF-β1-induced Smad-dependent and Smad-independent signaling pathways.It has been demonstrated that TAK1 can be activated by the interaction with TAK1-binding protein 1 (TAB1) by in vitro binding assays and in overexpression studies (29–31); however, it is not clear whether TAB1 plays a crucial role in ligand-induced TAK1 activation. In embryonic fibroblasts from TAB1 null mice, IL-1 and TNF-α could induce TAK1-mediated NF-κB and JNK activation (45). TAK1 activation induced by TNF-α, IL-1, and T-cell receptor requires TAB2 or its homologous protein TAB3 (46–50). Although many questions still remain, much progress has been made in understanding the activation mechanism of TAK1 by inflammatory cytokines (46, 47, 51–53). Ligand binding of IL-1 receptor (IL-1R) results in recruitment of MyD88, which serves as an adaptor for IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) 1 and 4. Subsequently IRAK1 is hyperphosphorylated and induces interaction with TNF-α receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6), resulting in TRAF6 oligomerization. After oligomerization of TRAF6, IRAK1-TRAF6 complex is dissociated from the receptor and associated with TAK1, which is mediated by TAB2 (or TAB3). In this process polyubiquitination of TRAF6 by Ubc13/Uev1A is thought to be critical for the association with TAB2 (or TAB3), which links TAK1 activation (46, 54, 55). In the case of TNF-α stimulation, TNF-α receptors form trimers and recruit adaptor proteins, TRAF2/5, and receptor-interacting protein 1 on the membrane. Ubc13/Uev1A- and TRAF2-dependent polyubiquitination of receptor-interacting protein 1 induce association of TAB2 (or TAB3), which then activates TAK1. Thus, TAB2 is required for ubiquitin-dependent activation of TAK1 by TRAFs. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 plays a role as an upstream mediator of TGF-β-induced TAK1 activation, which in turn activates the MKK4-JNK signaling cascade in 293T cells (56, 57). Besides hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1, it has been also suggested that X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) might link TAK1 to TGF-β/BMP receptors through the capability of XIAP to interact with TGF-β/BMP receptors and TAB1 (58). Thus, although various molecules participate in the activation of TAK1, the precise mechanism by which TGF-β1 induces TAK1 activation is incompletely understood. Here, we provide evidence that the association of TAK1 with TGF-β receptors is important for TGF-β1-induced activation of TAK1 in mouse mesangial cells. TGF-β1 stimulation induces interaction of TβRI and TβRII, triggering dissociation of TAK1 from TβRI, and subsequently TAK1 is phosphorylated through TAB1-mediated autophosphorylation, independent of receptor kinase activity of TβRI.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

In Vitro Characterization of a Recombinant Blh Protein from an Uncultured Marine Bacterium as a ��-Carotene 15,15��-Dioxygenase

Codon optimization was used to synthesize the blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 for expression in Escherichia coli. The expressed enzyme cleaved β-carotene at its central double bond (15,15′) to yield two molecules of all-trans-retinal. The molecular mass of the native purified enzyme was ∼64 kDa as a dimer of 32-kDa subunits. The K_m, k_cat, and k_cat/K_m values for β-carotene as substrate were 37 μm, 3.6 min⁻¹, and 97 mm⁻¹ min⁻¹, respectively. The enzyme exhibited the highest activity for β-carotene, followed by β-cryptoxanthin, β-apo-4′-carotenal, α-carotene, and γ-carotene in decreasing order, but not for β-apo-8′-carotenal, β-apo-12′-carotenal, lutein, zeaxanthin, or lycopene, suggesting that the presence of one unsubstituted β-ionone ring in a substrate with a molecular weight greater than C₃₅ seems to be essential for enzyme activity. The oxygen atom of retinal originated not from water but from molecular oxygen, suggesting that the enzyme was a β-carotene 15,15′-dioxygenase. Although the Blh protein and β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases catalyzed the same biochemical reaction, the Blh protein was unrelated to the mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases as assessed by their different properties, including DNA and amino acid sequences, molecular weight, form of association, reaction mechanism, kinetic properties, and substrate specificity. This is the first report of in vitro characterization of a bacterial β-carotene-cleaving enzyme.Vitamin A (retinol) is a fat-soluble vitamin and important for human health. In vivo, the cleavage of β-carotene to retinal is an important step of vitamin A synthesis. The cleavage can proceed via two different biochemical pathways (1, 2). The major pathway is a central cleavage catalyzed by mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases (EC 1.14.99.36). β-Carotene is cleaved by the enzyme symmetrically into two molecules of all-trans-retinal, and retinal is then converted to vitamin A in vivo (3–5). The second pathway is an eccentric cleavage that occurs at double bonds other than the central 15,15′-double bond of β-carotene to produce β-apo-carotenals with different chain lengths, which are catalyzed by carotenoid oxygenases from mammals, plants, and cyanobacteria (6). These β-apo-carotenals are degraded to one molecule of retinal, which is subsequently converted to vitamin A in vivo (2).β-Carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase was first isolated as a cytosolic enzyme by identifying the product of β-carotene cleavage as retinal (7). The characterization of the enzyme and the reaction pathway from β-carotene to retinal were also investigated (4, 8). The enzyme activity has been found in mammalian intestinal mucosa, jejunum enterocytes, liver, lung, kidney, and brain (5, 9, 10). Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase have been reported from various species, including chickens (11), fruit flies (12), humans (13), mice (14), and zebra fishes (15).Other proteins thought to convert β-carotene to retinal include bacterioopsin-related protein (Brp) and bacteriorhodopsin-related protein-like homolog protein (Blh) (16). Brp protein is expressed from the bop gene cluster, which encodes the structural protein bacterioopsin, consisting of at least three genes as follows: bop (bacterioopsin), brp (bacteriorhodopsin-related protein), and bat (bacterioopsin activator) (17). brp genes were reported in Haloarcula marismortui (18), Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (19), Halobacterium halobium (17), Haloquadratum walsbyi, and Salinibacter ruber (20). Blh protein is expressed from the proteorhodopsin gene cluster, which contains proteorhodopsin, crtE (geranylgeranyl-diphosphate synthase), crtI (phytoene dehydrogenase), crtB (phytoene synthase), crtY (lycopene cyclase), idi (isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase), and blh gene (21). Sources of blh genes were previously reported in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (19), Haloarcula marismortui (18), Halobacterium salinarum (22), uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 (16), and uncultured marine bacterium HF10 49E08 (21). β-Carotene biosynthetic genes crtE, crtB, crtI, crtY, ispA, and idi encode the enzymes necessary for the synthesis of β-carotene from isopentenyl diphosphate, and the Idi, IspA, CrtE, CrtB, CrtI, and CrtY proteins have been characterized in vitro (23–28). Blh protein has been proposed to catalyze or regulate the conversion of β-carotene to retinal (29, 30), but there is no direct proof of the enzymatic activity.In this study, we used codon optimization to synthesize the blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 for expression in Escherichia coli, and we performed a detailed biochemical and enzymological characterization of the expressed Blh protein. In addition, the properties of the enzyme were compared with those of mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases.     

Homo-oligomerization and Activation of AMP-activated Protein Kinase Are Mediated by the Kinase Domain ��G-Helix

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a heterotrimeric complex playing a crucial role in maintaining cellular energy homeostasis. Recently, homodimerization of mammalian AMPK and yeast ortholog SNF1 was shown by us and others. In SNF1, it involved specific hydrophobic residues in the kinase domain αG-helix. Mutation of the corresponding AMPK α-subunit residues (Val-219 and Phe-223) to glutamate reduced the tendency of the kinase to form higher order homo-oligomers, as was determined by the following three independent techniques in vitro: (i) small angle x-ray scattering, (ii) surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, and (iii) two-dimensional blue native/SDS-PAGE. Recombinant protein as well as AMPK in cell lysates of primary cells revealed distinct complexes of various sizes. In particular, the assembly of very high molecular mass complexes was dependent on both the αG-helix-mediated hydrophobic interactions and kinase activation. In vitro and when overexpressed in double knock-out (α1^−/−, α2^−/−) mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, activation of mutant AMPK was impaired, indicating a critical role of the αG-helix residues for AMPK activation via its upstream kinases. Also inactivation by protein phosphatase 2Cα was affected in mutant AMPK. Importantly, activation of mutant AMPK by LKB1 was restored by exchanging the corresponding and conserved hydrophobic αG-helix residues of LKB1 (Ile-260 and Phe-264) to positively charged amino acids. These mutations functionally rescued LKB1-dependent activation of mutant AMPK in vitro and in cell culture. Our data suggest a physiological role for the hydrophobic αG-helix residues in homo-oligomerization of heterotrimers and cellular interactions, in particular with upstream kinases, indicating an additional level of AMPK regulation.The maintenance of energy homeostasis is a basic requirement of all living organisms. The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)² is crucially involved in this essential process by playing a central role in sensing and regulating energy metabolism on the cellular and whole body level (1–6). AMPK is also participating in several signaling pathways associated with cancer and metabolic diseases, like type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and other metabolic disorders (7–9).Mammalian AMPK belongs to a highly conserved family of serine/threonine protein kinases with homologs found in all eukaryotic organisms examined (1, 3, 10). Its heterotrimeric structure includes a catalytic α-subunit and regulatory β- and γ-subunits. These subunits exist in different isoforms (α1, α2, β1, β2, γ1, γ2, and γ3) and splice variants (for γ2 and γ3) and can thus assemble to a broad variety of heterotrimeric isoform combinations. The α- and β-subunits possess multiple autophosphorylation sites, which have been implicated in regulation of subcellular localization and kinase activation (11–15). The most critical step of AMPK activation, however, is phosphorylation of Thr-172 within the activation segment of the α-subunit kinase domain. At least two AMPK upstream kinases (AMPKKs) have been identified so far, namely the tumor suppressor kinase LKB1 in complex with MO25 and STRAD (16) and Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-2 (CamKK2) (17). Furthermore, the transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 was also shown to activate AMPK using a variety of in vitro approaches (18), but the physiological relevance of these findings remains unclear. Besides direct phosphorylation of Thr-172, AMPK activity is stimulated by the allosteric activator AMP, which can bind to two Bateman domains formed by two pairs of CBS domains within the γ-subunit (19–22). Hereby bound AMP not only allosterically stimulates AMPK but also protects Thr-172 from dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2Cα (PP2Cα) and thus hinders inactivation of the kinase (19, 22, 23). Consequently, on the cellular level, AMPK is activated upon metabolic stress increasing the AMP/ATP ratio. Furthermore, AMPK activation can also be induced by several chemical compounds, like nucleoside 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside (24) and the anti-diabetic drug Metformin (25–28). In addition, the small molecule compound A-769662 was recently developed as a direct allosteric activator of AMPK (29, 30).Previous work in our groups proposed a model of AMPK regulation by AMP, which incorporates the major functional features and the latest structural information (31). The latter mainly included truncated core complexes of AMPK from different species (32–35). Further valuable structural information is provided by the x-ray structures of the isolated catalytic domains, in particular of the human AMPK α2-subunit (Protein Data Bank code 2H6D) and its yeast ortholog SNF1 (36, 37). The kinase domain of SNF1 is capable of forming homodimers in the protein crystal, as well as in vitro in solution, in a unique way, which has not been observed previously in any other kinase (36). The dimer interface is predominantly formed by hydrophobic interactions of the loop-αG region, also known as subdomain X situated on the large kinase lobe (36, 38, 39), and it mainly involves Ile-257 and Phe-261. Because the T-loop activation segment was buried within the dimer interface, it was suggested that the dimeric state of the SNF1 catalytic domain represents the inactive form of the kinase. Intriguingly, it was shown in our groups by small angle x-ray scattering that AMPK self-organizes in a concentration-dependent manner to form homo-oligomers in solution (31). However, the interface responsible for oligomerization of the AMPK heterotrimer has remained elusive.Here we further investigate the distinct oligomeric states of the AMPK heterotrimer and suggest a possible regulatory function for this process. Most importantly, we provide conclusive evidence for participation of αG-helix residues in the recognition of AMPK by its upstream kinases LKB1 and CamKK2.     

Thioredoxin-independent Regulation of Metabolism by the ��-Arrestin Proteins

Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip), originally characterized as an inhibitor of thioredoxin, is now known to be a critical regulator of glucose metabolism in vivo. Txnip is a member of the α-arrestin protein family; the α-arrestins are related to the classical β-arrestins and visual arrestins. Txnip is the only α-arrestin known to bind thioredoxin, and it is not known whether the metabolic effects of Txnip are related to its ability to bind thioredoxin or related to conserved α-arrestin function. Here we show that wild type Txnip and Txnip C247S, a Txnip mutant that does not bind thioredoxin in vitro, both inhibit glucose uptake in mature adipocytes and in primary skin fibroblasts. Furthermore, we show that Txnip C247S does not bind thioredoxin in cells, using thiol alkylation to trap the Txnip-thioredoxin complex. Because Txnip function was independent of thioredoxin binding, we tested whether inhibition of glucose uptake was conserved in the related α-arrestins Arrdc4 and Arrdc3. Both Txnip and Arrdc4 inhibited glucose uptake and lactate output, while Arrdc3 had no effect. Structure-function analysis indicated that Txnip and Arrdc4 inhibit glucose uptake independent of the C-terminal WW-domain binding motifs, recently identified as important in yeast α-arrestins. Instead, regulation of glucose uptake was intrinsic to the arrestin domains themselves. These data demonstrate that Txnip regulates cellular metabolism independent of its binding to thioredoxin and reveal the arrestin domains as crucial structural elements in metabolic functions of α-arrestin proteins.Thioredoxin-interacting protein (Txnip),³ an inhibitor of thioredoxin disulfide reductase activity in vitro (1–3), is robustly induced by glucose (4–6) and a critical regulator of metabolism in vivo (7–10). In humans, Txnip expression is suppressed by insulin and strongly up-regulated in diabetes (7). Txnip-deficient mice have fasting hypoglycemia and ketosis (8, 9, 11, 12) with a striking enhancement of glucose uptake by peripheral tissues (8, 9). We have proposed that Txnip inhibits thioredoxin by forming a mixed disulfide with thioredoxin at its catalytic active site cysteines in a disulfide exchange reaction (13). However, it is not known how Txnip metabolic functions relate to its ability to bind thioredoxin.Structurally, Txnip belongs to the arrestin superfamily of proteins (14). The prototypical arrestins (the visual arrestins and the β-arrestins) are key regulators of receptor signaling. The β-arrestins, named for their interaction with the β-adrenergic receptor, are now known to control signaling through the multiple families of receptors (15). These arrestin proteins have two wing-like arrestin domains arranged around a central core that detects and binds selectively to the charged phosphates of activated receptors (16). The arrestin domains then act as multifunctional scaffolds that cannot only quench receptor signals by recruiting endocytotic machinery and ubiquitin ligases, but also start new signal cascades (15). Recently, arrestin-β2 has also been shown to play a key role in metabolism as a controller of insulin receptor signaling that is deficient in diabetes (17).In addition to the classical visual/β-arrestins, a large number of arrestins more closely related to Txnip are present throughout multicellular evolution. These proteins have been termed the “α-arrestins,” as they are of more ancient origin than the visual/β family (14). Although no structures are known of the α-arrestins to date, they appear highly likely to share the overall fold: two β-sheet sandwich arrestin domains connected by a short linker sequence (14, 18). Confidence in this prediction has been enhanced by the surprising finding that the vps26 family of proteins, even more distantly related to the classical arrestins than Txnip, also share the arrestin fold (19). The vps26 proteins are a component of the retromer complex that controls retrograde transport of recycling endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. This functional overlap with visual/β-arrestin regulation of endocytosis suggests that control of endosome formation and transport may be a conserved function of the arrestin superfamily fold.The functions of the mammalian α-arrestins remain unclear. Humans have six α-arrestins: Txnip and five other proteins, which have been assigned the names Arrdc1–5 (arrestin domain-containing 1–5) (13). Very little is known about these other α-arrestins; thioredoxin binding is not conserved beyond Txnip (13, 20). More is known in yeast: recent reports suggest that α-arrestins function in regulation of endocytosis and protein ubiquitination through PXXY motifs in their C-terminal tails (21–25). However, as all the vertebrate α-arrestins have diverged from the ancestral α-arrestins (14), their structure-function relationships may differ from yeast α-arrestins.Given that other α-arrestins are not thioredoxin-binding proteins, we hypothesized that Txnip metabolic functions may be conserved in mammalian α-arrestins and independent of its interaction with thioredoxin. Overexpression of Txnip in vitro can decrease levels of available thioredoxin and increase levels of reactive oxygen species (1, 3, 26). However, in vivo studies of two different Txnip-deficient mouse models found no change in available thioredoxin levels (8, 27). Txnip reportedly binds to other proteins including Jab1 (28) and Dnajb5 (29), but it is not clear to what extent these interactions are themselves independent of a Txnip-thioredoxin complex (30).Using overexpression of a mutant Txnip that does not bind thioredoxin, we show here that a major metabolic function of Txnip, its inhibition of glucose uptake, does not require interaction with thioredoxin. Instead, we show that inhibition of glucose uptake is a conserved function of another human α-arrestin, Arrdc4. Studies of Txnip mutants and chimeric α-arrestins suggest that the metabolic functions of Txnip and Arrdc4 are intrinsic to the arrestin domains.     

Biochemical Characterization and Function of Complexes Formed by Hyaluronan and the Heavy Chains of Inter-��-inhibitor (HC��HA) Purified from Extracts of Human Amniotic Membrane

Clinically, amniotic membrane (AM) suppresses inflammation, scarring, and angiogenesis. AM contains abundant hyaluronan (HA) but its function in exerting these therapeutic actions remains unclear. Herein, AM was extracted sequentially with buffers A, B, and C, or separately by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) alone. Agarose gel electrophoresis showed that high molecular weight (HMW) HA (an average of ∼3000 kDa) was predominantly extracted in isotonic Extract A (70.1 ± 6.0%) and PBS (37.7 ± 3.2%). Western blot analysis of these extracts with hyaluronidase digestion or NaOH treatment revealed that HMW HA was covalently linked with the heavy chains (HCs) of inter-α-inhibitor (IαI) via a NaOH-sensitive bond, likely transferred by the tumor necrosis factor-α stimulated gene-6 protein (TSG-6). This HC·HA complex (nHC·HA) could be purified from Extract PBS by two rounds of CsCl/guanidine HCl ultracentrifugation as well as in vitro reconstituted (rcHC·HA) by mixing HMW HA, serum IαI, and recombinant TSG-6. Consistent with previous reports, Extract PBS suppressed transforming growth factor-β1 promoter activation in corneal fibroblasts and induced mac ro phage apo pto sis. However, these effects were abolished by hyaluronidase digestion or heat treatment. More importantly, the effects were retained in the nHC·HA or rcHC·HA. These data collectively suggest that the HC·HA complex is the active component in AM responsible in part for clinically observed anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring actions.Hyaluronan (HA)⁴ is widely distributed in extracellular matrices, tissues, body fluids, and even in intracellular compartments (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). The molecular weight of HA ranges from 200 to 10,000 kDa depending on the source (3), but can also exist as smaller fragments and oligosaccharides under certain physiological or pathological conditions (1). Investigations over the last 15 years have suggested that low M_r HA can induce the gene expression of proinflammatory mediators and proangiogenesis, whereas high molecular weight (HMW) HA inhibits these processes (4–7).Several proteins have been shown to bind to HA (8) such as aggrecan (9), cartilage link protein (10), versican (11), CD44 (12, 13), inter-α-inhibitor (IαI) (14, 15), and tumor necrosis factor-α stimulated gene-6 protein (TSG-6) (16, 17). IαI consists of two heavy chains (HCs) (HC1 and HC2), both of which are linked through ester bonds to a chondroitin sulfate chain that is attached to the light chain, i.e. bikunin. Among all HA-binding proteins, only the HCs of IαI have been clearly demonstrated to be covalently coupled to HA (14, 18). However, TSG-6 has also been reported to form stable, possibly covalent, complexes with HA, either alone (19, 20) or when associated with HC (21).The formation of covalent bonds between HCs and HA is mediated by TSG-6 (22–24) where its expression is often induced by inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1 (25, 26). TSG-6 is also expressed in inflammatory-like processes, such as ovulation (21, 27, 28) and cervical ripening (29). TSG-6 interacts with both HA (17) and IαI (21, 24, 30–33), and is essential for covalently transferring HCs on to HA (22–24). The TSG-6-mediated formation of the HC·HA complex has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in female fertility in mice. The HC·HA complex is an integral part of an expanded extracellular “cumulus” matrix around the oocyte, which plays a critical role in successful ovulation and fertilization in vivo (22, 34). HC·HA complexes have also been found at sites of inflammation (35–38) where its pro- or anti-inflammatory role remain arguable (39, 40).Immunostaining reveals abundant HA in the avascular stromal matrix of the AM (41, 42).⁵ In ophthalmology, cryopreserved AM has been widely used as a surgical graft for ocular surface reconstruction and exerts clinically observable actions to promote epithelial wound healing and to suppress inflammation, scarring, and angiogenesis (for reviews see Refs. 43–45). However, it is not clear whether HA in AM forms HC·HA complex, and if so whether such an HC·HA complex exerts any of the above therapeutic actions. To address these questions, we extracted AM with buffers of increasing salt concentration. Because HMW HA was found to form the HC·HA complex and was mainly extractable by isotonic solutions, we further purified it from the isotonic AM extract and reconstituted it in vitro from three defined components, i.e. HMW HA, serum IαI, and recombinant TSG-6. Our results showed that the HC·HA complex is an active component in AM responsible for the suppression of TGF-β1 promoter activity, linkable to the scarring process noted before by AM (46–48) and by the AM soluble extract (49), as well as for the promotion of macrophage death, linkable to the inflammatory process noted by AM (50) and the AM soluble extract (51).