Greater Transport Efficiencies of the Membrane Fatty Acid Transporters FAT/CD36 and FATP4 Compared with FABPpm and FATP1 and Differential Effects on Fatty Acid Esterification and Oxidation in Rat Skeletal Muscle

In selected mammalian tissues, long chain fatty acid transporters (FABPpm, FAT/CD36, FATP1, and FATP4) are co-expressed. There is controversy as to whether they all function as membrane-bound transporters and whether they channel fatty acids to oxidation and/or esterification. Among skeletal muscles, the protein expression of FABPpm, FAT/CD36, and FATP4, but not FATP1, correlated highly with the capacities for oxidative metabolism (r ≥ 0.94), fatty acid oxidation (r ≥ 0.88), and triacylglycerol esterification (r ≥ 0.87). We overexpressed independently FABPpm, FAT/CD36, FATP1, and FATP4, within a normal physiologic range, in rat skeletal muscle, to determine the effects on fatty acid transport and metabolism. Independent overexpression of each fatty acid transporter occurred without altering either the expression or plasmalemmal content of other fatty acid transporters. All transporters increased fatty acid transport, but FAT/CD36 and FATP4 were 2.3- and 1.7-fold more effective than FABPpm and FATP1, respectively. Fatty acid transporters failed to alter the rates of fatty acid esterification into triacylglycerols. In contrast, all transporters increased the rates of long chain fatty acid oxidation, but the effects of FABPpm and FAT/CD36 were 3-fold greater than for FATP1 and FATP4. Thus, fatty acid transporters exhibit different capacities for fatty acid transport and metabolism. In vivo, FAT/CD36 and FATP4 are the most effective fatty acid transporters, whereas FABPpm and FAT/CD36 are key for stimulating fatty acid oxidation.Uptake of long chain fatty acids across the plasma membrane had long been considered to occur via passive diffusion. However, in recent years, there has been a fundamental shift in our understanding, and it is now widely recognized that long chain fatty acids cross the plasma membrane via a protein-mediated mechanism (for reviews, see Refs. 1–3). A number of fatty acid transporters have been identified, including fatty acid translocase/CD36 (FAT/CD36), plasma membrane-associated fatty acid binding proteins (FABPpm), and a family of fatty acid transport proteins (FATP1–6)⁵ (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 4). Selected stimuli (muscle contraction, insulin, and AICAR) induce the translocation of selected fatty acid transporters (FABPpm, FAT/CD36, and FATP1) from an intracellular depot to the plasma membrane, in both heart and skeletal muscle, resulting in concurrently increased rates of fatty acid transport (for a review, see Ref. 1). Some fatty acid transporters have now also been implicated in the dysregulation of fatty acid metabolism in heart and skeletal muscle in models of insulin resistance and type 1 and 2 diabetes, including FAT/CD36 (5–9), FATP1 (10, 11), and possibly FATP4 (11, 12) but not FABPpm (5–7). Thus, in recent years, it has become widely accepted that (a) long chain fatty acids traverse the plasma membrane via a protein-mediated mechanism and (b) some of the fatty acid transporters are central to the dysregulation in skeletal muscle fatty acid metabolism in obesity and type 2 diabetes.In vivo, many of the fatty acid transporters are frequently co-expressed in different tissues. FAT/CD36 and FABPpm are ubiquitously expressed (1), whereas FATP1–6 exhibit a somewhat tissue-specific distribution pattern (13, 14). The reason for the co-expression of different fatty acid transporters within the same tissue remains unclear. It has been speculated that selected fatty acid transporters may need to interact with each other (15, 16). Alternatively, it is also possible that (a) different fatty acid transporters have discrepant transport capacities, and (b) selected transporters may channel fatty acids differentially to fatty acid oxidation and esterification into triacylglycerols in mammalian tissue.Recent evidence has shown that the transport capacities among FATPs can differ substantially, as revealed by overexpression (14, 17, 18) or knockdown studies (19), but there is little agreement as to which FATP is most effective. Extensive studies by DiRusso et al. (17) in yeast revealed that when FATP1–6 were overexpressed to similar levels (qualitative assessment), FATP4 exhibited 1.7- and 3-fold greater fatty acid transport effectiveness compared with FATP1 and FATP2, respectively, whereas no fatty acid transport capacities were attributable to FATP3, -5, and -6 (17). In contrast, in HEK293 cells, the FATP6 transport capacity was 3- and 6.5-fold greater than FATP1 and FATP4, respectively (14), whereas in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, a fatty acid transport role was evident only for FATP1 and not FATP4 (19). Others have also questioned the transport role of FATP4 (20). These discrepant findings with respect to the transport effectiveness of FATPs may reflect, in part, the use of diverse cell types with ill defined metabolic needs and/or machinery for fatty acid uptake and metabolism. Indeed, several recent reports indicate that fatty acid transport cannot be adequately examined in some cells, because these appear to lack accessory proteins that may be involved in fatty acid transport (21, 22). In addition, extrapolation of results from cultured cells to metabolically important tissue in vivo may also be problematic, since cells and mammalian tissues probably have different requirements for fatty acid utilization, and their regulation of fatty acid uptake may also differ. For example, the mechanisms regulating the acute contraction-induced up-regulation of fatty acid transport and oxidation, such as occurs in heart and skeletal muscle, is probably absent in selected cell cultures.Assessment of fatty acid transporter effectiveness, in vivo, cannot be determined in knock-out animals, since compensatory responses in some fatty acid transporters (FATP1 and -4) occur when another fatty acid transporter (FAT/CD36) has been ablated (23, 24). Thus, the relative effectiveness of selected fatty acid transporters on fatty acid transport in vivo remains unknown. In addition, whether fatty acid transporters channel fatty acids to a particular metabolic fate, as has been suggested based on studies in cultured cells (18, 19, 25), may depend on the cell type being examined.It is desirable to discern the effectiveness of selected fatty acid transporters in mammalian tissues that have a well known system for transporting and utilizing fatty acids and in which fatty acid transporters can be independently up-regulated without disturbing the expression of other fatty acid transporters. These criteria can be satisfied in rat skeletal muscle in which genes can be up-regulated under controlled conditions within a physiologically meaningful range (26–28). Therefore, in the present study, we have compared the independent transport effectiveness of fatty acid transporters (FABPpm, FAT/CD36, FATP1, and FATP4) in skeletal muscle, without disturbing the expression and plasmalemmal content of other fatty acid transporters. In addition, we also examined the contributions of these transporters to fatty acid oxidation and esterification into triacylglycerols. These are the first studies to reveal that in vivo (a) the fatty acid transport effectiveness of fatty acid transporters differs considerably, and (b) in skeletal muscle, these transporters serve to channel fatty acids to oxidation, not esterification into triacylglycerols.     

Sip1, a Novel RS Domain-Containing Protein Essential for Pre-mRNA Splicing

Previous studies have shown that protein-protein interactions among splicing factors may play an important role in pre-mRNA splicing. We report here identification and functional characterization of a new splicing factor, Sip1 (SC35-interacting protein 1). Sip1 was initially identified by virtue of its interaction with SC35, a splicing factor of the SR family. Sip1 interacts with not only several SR proteins but also with U1-70K and U2AF65, proteins associated with 5′ and 3′ splice sites, respectively. The predicted Sip1 sequence contains an arginine-serine-rich (RS) domain but does not have any known RNA-binding motifs, indicating that it is not a member of the SR family. Sip1 also contains a region with weak sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator suppressor of white apricot (SWAP). An essential role for Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing was suggested by the observation that anti-Sip1 antibodies depleted splicing activity from HeLa nuclear extract. Purified recombinant Sip1 protein, but not other RS domain-containing proteins such as SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, restored the splicing activity of the Sip1-immunodepleted extract. Addition of U2AF65 protein further enhanced the splicing reconstitution by the Sip1 protein. Deficiency in the formation of both A and B splicing complexes in the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract indicates an important role of Sip1 in spliceosome assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that Sip1 is a novel RS domain-containing protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and that the functional role of Sip1 in splicing is distinct from those of known RS domain-containing splicing factors.Pre-mRNA splicing takes place in spliceosomes, the large RNA-protein complexes containing pre-mRNA, U1, U2, U4/6, and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), and a large number of accessory protein factors (for reviews, see references 21, 22, 37, 44, and 48). It is increasingly clear that the protein factors are important for pre-mRNA splicing and that studies of these factors are essential for further understanding of molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing.Most mammalian splicing factors have been identified by biochemical fractionation and purification (3, 15, 19, 31–36, 45, 69–71, 73), by using antibodies recognizing splicing factors (8, 9, 16, 17, 61, 66, 67, 74), and by sequence homology (25, 52, 74).Splicing factors containing arginine-serine-rich (RS) domains have emerged as important players in pre-mRNA splicing. These include members of the SR family, both subunits of U2 auxiliary factor (U2AF), and the U1 snRNP protein U1-70K (for reviews, see references 18, 41, and 59). Drosophila alternative splicing regulators transformer (Tra), transformer 2 (Tra2), and suppressor of white apricot (SWAP) also contain RS domains (20, 40, 42). RS domains in these proteins play important roles in pre-mRNA splicing (7, 71, 75), in nuclear localization of these splicing proteins (23, 40), and in protein-RNA interactions (56, 60, 64). Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated that one mechanism whereby SR proteins function in splicing is to mediate specific protein-protein interactions among spliceosomal components and between general splicing factors and alternative splicing regulators (1, 1a, 6, 10, 27, 63, 74, 77). Such protein-protein interactions may play critical roles in splice site recognition and association (for reviews, see references 4, 18, 37, 41, 47 and 59). Specific interactions among the splicing factors also suggest that it is possible to identify new splicing factors by their interactions with known splicing factors.Here we report identification of a new splicing factor, Sip1, by its interaction with the essential splicing factor SC35. The predicted Sip1 protein sequence contains an RS domain and a region with sequence similarity to the Drosophila splicing regulator, SWAP. We have expressed and purified recombinant Sip1 protein and raised polyclonal antibodies against the recombinant Sip1 protein. The anti-Sip1 antibodies specifically recognize a protein migrating at a molecular mass of approximately 210 kDa in HeLa nuclear extract. The anti-Sip1 antibodies sufficiently deplete Sip1 protein from the nuclear extract, and the Sip1-depleted extract is inactive in pre-mRNA splicing. Addition of recombinant Sip1 protein can partially restore splicing activity to the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract, indicating an essential role of Sip1 in pre-mRNA splicing. Other RS domain-containing proteins, including SC35, ASF/SF2, and U2AF65, cannot substitute for Sip1 in reconstituting splicing activity of the Sip1-depleted nuclear extract. However, addition of U2AF65 further increases splicing activity of Sip1-reconstituted nuclear extract, suggesting that there may be a functional interaction between Sip1 and U2AF65 in nuclear extract.     

Mcl-1 Degradation during Hepatocyte Lipoapoptosis

The mechanisms of free fatty acid-induced lipoapoptosis are incompletely understood. Here we demonstrate that Mcl-1, an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, was rapidly degraded in hepatocytes in response to palmitate and stearate by a proteasome-dependent pathway. Overexpression of a ubiquitin-resistant Mcl-1 mutant in Huh-7 cells attenuated palmitate-mediated Mcl-1 loss and lipoapoptosis; conversely, short hairpin RNA-targeted knockdown of Mcl-1 sensitized these cells to lipoapoptosis. Palmitate-induced Mcl-1 degradation was attenuated by the novel protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor rottlerin. Of the two human novel PKC isozymes, PKCδ and PKCθ, only activation of PKCθ was observed by phospho-immunoblot analysis. As compared with Jurkat cells, a smaller PKCθ polypeptide and mRNA were expressed in hepatocytes consistent with an alternative splice variant. Short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of PKCθ reduced Mcl-1 degradation and lipoapoptosis. Likewise, genetic deletion of Pkcθ also attenuated Mcl-1 degradation and cytotoxicity by palmitate in primary hepatocytes. During treatment with palmitate, rottlerin inhibited phosphorylation of Mcl-1 at Ser¹⁵⁹, a phosphorylation site previously implicated in Mcl-1 turnover. Consistent with these results, an Mcl-1 S159A mutant was resistant to degradation and improved cell survival during palmitate treatment. Collectively, these results implicate PKCθ-dependent destabilization of Mcl-1 as a mechanism contributing to hepatocyte lipoapoptosis.Current evidence suggests that hepatic steatosis is present in up to 30% of the American population (1). A subset of these individuals develop severe hepatic lipotoxicity, a syndrome referred to as NASH² (2), which can progress to cirrhosis and its chronic sequela (3, 4). A major risk factor for hepatic lipotoxicity is insulin resistance (5–7), resulting in excessive lipolysis within peripheral adipose tissue with release of high levels of free fatty acids (FFA) to the circulation. Circulating FFA are taken up by the liver via fatty acid transporter 5 and CD36 (8–10), and the bulk of hepatic neutral fat is derived from re-esterification of circulating FFA (8). Current concepts indicate that FFA, and not their esterified product (triglyceride), mediate hepatic lipotoxicity (11, 12). Elevated serum FFA correlate with liver disease severity (13–15), and therapies that enhance insulin sensitivity ameliorate hepatic lipotoxicity, in part, by decreasing plasma FFA (16). Hepatic FFA also accumulate in experimental steatohepatitis, further supporting a role for these nutrients in hepatic lipotoxicity (17). Saturated FFA are more strongly implicated in hepatic lipotoxicity than unsaturated FFA (18, 19). Saturated FFA induce hepatocyte apoptosis (20, 21), a cardinal feature of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (22), and serum biomarkers of apoptosis are useful for identifying hepatic lipotoxicity (23). Thus, FFA-mediated lipotoxicity occurs, in part, by apoptosis.Apoptosis is regulated by members of the Bcl-2 protein family (24). These proteins can be categorized into three subsets as follows: the guardians or anti-apoptotic members of this family, which include Bcl-2, A1, Mcl-1, Bcl-x_L, and Bcl-w; the multidomain executioners or proapoptotic members of this family, which include Bax and Bak; and the messengers or biosensors of cell death, which share only the third Bcl-2 homology domain and are referred to as BH3-only proteins. This last group of proteins includes Bid, Bim, Bmf, Puma, Noxa, Hrk, Bad, and Bik. We have previously reported that cytotoxic FFA induce Bim expression by a FoxO3a-dependent mechanism that contributes, in part, to lipoapoptosis by activating Bax (20, 21). However, Bax activation can be held in check by anti-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family suggesting their function may also be dysregulated during FFA-mediated cytotoxicity.Bcl-2 is not expressed in hepatocytes at the protein level (25), whereas Bcl-w and Bfl-1/A1 knock-out mice have no liver phenotype (26–28). However, both potent anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-x_L and Mcl-1 are expressed by hepatocytes and exhibit a liver phenotype in knock-out mice (29, 30), whereas up-regulation of Mcl-1 renders hepatocytes resistant to apoptosis (31–33). It has also been posited that cellular elimination of Mcl-1 is a critical step in certain proapoptotic cascades (34, 35). Mcl-1 is unique among Bcl-2 proteins in that it has a short half-life, 30–120 min in most cell types, due to the presence of two sequences rich in proline, glutamic acid, serine, and threonine, which target the protein for rapid degradation by the proteasome (36). Proteasomal degradation of Mcl-1 is promoted by ubiquitination, which in turn is regulated by various kinase cascades (36). Despite its potential importance, a role for Mcl-1 in regulating hepatocyte FFA-mediated lipoapoptosis remains unexplored.Given that FFA induce insulin resistance (37), the kinases potentially regulating lipoapoptosis are likely those also identified in insulin resistance syndromes, especially the novel PKC isoforms PKCδ and PKCθ (38). The novel PKC isoforms are activated by diacylglycerol, which rises in the presence of FFA (39–41), and diacylglycerol levels are significantly increased in NASH (42). A role for PKCδ in apoptosis has not been described. PKCθ has recently been shown to be activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress in liver cells (43) and lipids in vivo (44, 45). Furthermore, PKCθ has also been implicated in apoptosis of Jurkat cells, neuroblastoma cells, and myeloid leukemia cells (46, 47). However, neither its role in mediating lipoapoptosis nor modulating levels/activity of Bcl-2 proteins has been examined.This study addresses the role of Mcl-1 and PKCθ in FFA-induced lipoapoptosis. We identify a pathway that involves PKCθ-dependent proteasomal degradation of Mcl-1. Using inhibitors of various steps along this pathway, along with Mcl-1 mutants that are resistant to proteasomal degradation or Ser¹⁵⁹ phosphorylation, our studies implicate Mcl-1 degradation via a PKCθ-dependent process as a critical step in lipoapoptosis.     

Sarcoglycan Complex: IMPLICATIONS FOR METABOLIC DEFECTS IN MUSCULAR DYSTROPHIES*

The sarcoglycans are known as an integral subcomplex of the dystrophin glycoprotein complex, the function of which is best characterized in skeletal muscle in relation to muscular dystrophies. Here we demonstrate that the white adipocytes, which share a common precursor with the myocytes, express a cell-specific sarcoglycan complex containing β-, δ-, and ϵ-sarcoglycan. In addition, the adipose sarcoglycan complex associates with sarcospan and laminin binding dystroglycan. Using multiple sarcoglycan null mouse models, we show that loss of α-sarcoglycan has no consequence on the expression of the adipocyte sarcoglycan complex. However, loss of β- or δ-sarcoglycan leads to a concomitant loss of the sarcoglycan complex as well as sarcospan and a dramatic reduction in dystroglycan in adipocytes. We further demonstrate that β-sarcoglycan null mice, which lack the sarcoglycan complex in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, are glucose-intolerant and exhibit whole body insulin resistance specifically due to impaired insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscles. Thus, our data demonstrate a novel function of the sarcoglycan complex in whole body glucose homeostasis and skeletal muscle metabolism, suggesting that the impairment of the skeletal muscle metabolism influences the pathogenesis of muscular dystrophy.Muscle fat infiltration is recognized as a hallmark pathological feature in dystrophin glycoprotein complex (DGC)³-related muscular dystrophies (1) that include dystrophinopathies (2, 3) and sarcoglycanopathies (LGMD2C-F) (4). In agreement, magnetic resonance imaging measurements of fat infiltration allow accurate assessments of disease severity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients (3). Association of adipose tissue development with degenerative/regenerative or atrophic changes in skeletal muscle is also supported by the finding that adipogenesis-competent cells within the skeletal muscle are activated during muscle regeneration (5). However, the molecular mechanism(s) underlying muscle fatty metamorphosis remain unclear.Ectopic fat deposition in skeletal muscles is primarily described in animals and humans with lipodystrophy and sarcopenia. In these conditions, the accumulation of lipids and adipocytes in skeletal muscle is often accompanied by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (6–11), both of which are strong indicators of muscle metabolic defects (12, 13) and deregulated adipogenesis (14). Furthermore, both adipose-derived and muscle-derived stem cells differentiate into adipocytes upon exposure to high levels of glucose (15), linking impaired muscle metabolism with muscle fat deposition.It is long held that the biogenesis of a basement membrane takes place in the earliest steps of adipogenesis and that extensive extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling occurs throughout adipogenesis (16, 17). The concept that cell surface receptors play a role in the regulation of adipogenesis and thus may underlie metabolic disorders just recently emerged with a study of the integrin complexes (18). Given that the DGC in its capacity as an ECM receptor is critical for muscle integrity (19, 20) and that white adipocytes and skeletal muscle cells originate from the same mesenchymal precursor cells (21, 22), we set out to determine whether components of the skeletal muscle DGC are expressed in white adipocytes. Herein, we describe a unique adipose sarcoglycan (SG) complex that includes β-, δ-, and ϵ-SG. This complex is tightly associated with sarcospan (Sspn) and dystroglycan (DG). Moreover, we show that DG functions as a novel ECM receptor in white adipocytes. Because adipose tissue and skeletal muscle play critical roles in the maintenance of normal glucose homeostasis and whole body insulin sensitivity (23), we examined the metabolic consequences of the SG complex disruption in both adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. Using in vivo approaches, we observed that the β-SG null mouse (24), a mouse model of muscular dystrophy, is glucose-intolerant and exhibits whole body insulin resistance specifically due to impaired insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle.     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Functional Proteomics Identifies Acinus L as a Direct Insulin- and Amino Acid-Dependent Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) Substrate

The serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) governs growth, metabolism, and aging in response to insulin and amino acids (aa), and is often activated in metabolic disorders and cancer. Much is known about the regulatory signaling network that encompasses mTOR, but surprisingly few direct mTOR substrates have been established to date. To tackle this gap in our knowledge, we took advantage of a combined quantitative phosphoproteomic and interactomic strategy. We analyzed the insulin- and aa-responsive phosphoproteome upon inhibition of the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) component raptor, and investigated in parallel the interactome of endogenous mTOR. By overlaying these two datasets, we identified acinus L as a potential novel mTORC1 target. We confirmed acinus L as a direct mTORC1 substrate by co-immunoprecipitation and MS-enhanced kinase assays. Our study delineates a triple proteomics strategy of combined phosphoproteomics, interactomics, and MS-enhanced kinase assays for the de novo-identification of mTOR network components, and provides a rich source of potential novel mTOR interactors and targets for future investigation.The serine/threonine kinase mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)¹ is conserved in all eukaryotes from yeast to mammals (1). mTOR is a central controller of cellular growth, whole body metabolism, and aging, and is frequently deregulated in metabolic diseases and cancer (2). Consequently, mTOR as well as its upstream and downstream cues are prime candidates for targeted drug development to alleviate the causes and symptoms of age-related diseases (3, 4). The identification of novel mTOR regulators and effectors thus remains a major goal in biomedical research. A vast body of literature describes a complex signaling network around mTOR. However, our current comparatively detailed knowledge of mTOR''s upstream cues contrasts with a rather limited set of known direct mTOR substrates.mTOR exists in two structurally and functionally distinct multiprotein complexes, termed mTORC1 and mTORC2. Both complexes contain mTOR kinase as well as the proteins mLST8 (mammalian lethal with SEC thirteen 8) (5–7), and deptor (DEP domain-containing mTOR-interacting protein) (8). mTORC1 contains the specific scaffold protein raptor (regulatory-associated protein of mTOR) (9, 10), whereas mTORC2 contains the specific binding partners rictor (rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR) (5–7), mSIN1 (TORC2 subunit MAPKAP1) (11–13), and PRR5/L (proline rich protein 5/-like) (14–16). The small macrolide rapamycin acutely inhibits mTORC1, but can also have long-term effects on mTORC2 (17, 18). More recently, ATP-analogs (19) that block both mTOR complexes, such as Torin 1 (20), have been developed. As rapamycin has already been available for several decades, our knowledge of signaling events associated with mTORC1 as well as its metabolic inputs and outputs is much broader as compared with mTORC2. mTORC1 responds to growth factors (insulin), nutrients (amino acids, aa) and energy (ATP). In response, mTORC1 activates anabolic processes (protein, lipid, nucleotide synthesis) and blocks catabolic processes (autophagy) to ultimately allow cellular growth (21). The insulin signal is transduced to mTORC1 via the insulin receptor (IR), and the insulin receptor substrate (IRS), which associates with class I phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks). Subsequent phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5 trisphosphate (PIP3) binding leads to relocalization of the AGC kinases phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) and Akt (also termed protein kinase B, PKB) to the plasma membrane, where PDK1 phosphorylates Akt at T308 (22, 23). In response, Akt phosphorylates and inhibits the heterocomplex formed by the tuberous sclerosis complex proteins 1 and 2 (TSC1-TSC2) (24, 25). TSC1-TSC2 is the inhibitory, GTPase-activating protein for the mTORC1-inducing GTPase Ras homolog enriched in brain (rheb) (26–30), which activates mTORC1 at the lysosome. mTORC1 localization depends on the presence of aa, which in a rag GTPase-dependent manner induce mTORC1 relocalization to lysosomes (31, 32). Low energy levels are sensed by the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK), which in turn phosphorylates the TSC1-TSC2 complex (33) and raptor (34), thereby inhibiting mTORC1.mTORC1 phosphorylates its well-described downstream substrate S6-kinase (S6K) at T389, the proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) at S183, and the translational repressor 4E-binding protein (4E-BP) at T37/46 (35–41). Unphosphorylated 4E-BP binds and inhibits the translation initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), which within the eIF4F complex mediates the scanning process of the ribosome to reach the start codon. Phosphorylation by mTORC1 inhibits 4E-BP''s interaction with eIF4E, thus allowing for assembly of eIF4F, and translation initiation (42, 43). More recently, also the IR-activating growth factor receptor-bound protein 10 (Grb10) (44, 45), the autophagy-initiating Unc-51-like kinase ULK1 (46), and the trifunctional enzymatic complex CAD composed of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 2, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase (47, 48), which is required for nucleotide synthesis, have been described as direct mTORC1 substrates.mTORC2 activation is mostly described to be mediated by insulin, and this is mediated by a PI3K variant that is distinct from the PI3K upstream of mTORC1 (49, 50). Furthermore, mTORC2 responds to aa (5, 51). In response, mTORC2 phosphorylates the AGC kinases Akt at S473 (52–55), and serum and glucocorticoid kinase SGK (56) and protein kinase C alpha (PKCalpha) (7) within their hydrophobic motifs (57, 58), to control cellular motility (5–7), hepatic glycolysis, and lipogenesis (59). In addition, mTOR autophosphorylation at S2481 has been established as an mTORC2 readout in several cell lines including HeLa cells (49).Given the multiplicity of effects via which mTOR controls cellular and organismal growth and metabolism, it is surprising that only relatively few direct mTOR substrates have been established to date. Proteomic studies are widely used to identify novel interactors and substrates of protein kinases. Two studies have recently shed light on the interaction of rapamycin and ATP-analog mTOR inhibitors with TSC2 inhibition in mammalian cells (44, 45), and one study has analyzed the effects of raptor and rictor knockouts in non-stimulated cells (48).In this work, we report a functional proteomics approach to study mTORC1 substrates. We used an inducible raptor knockdown to inhibit mTORC1 in HeLa cells, and analyzed the effect in combination with insulin and aa induction by quantitative phosphoproteomics using stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (60). In parallel, we purified endogenous mTOR complexes and studied the interactome of mTOR by SILAC-MS. Through comparative data evaluation, we identified acinus L as a potential novel aa/insulin-sensitive mTOR substrate. We further validated acinus L by co-immunoprecipitation and MS-enhanced kinase assays as a new direct mTORC1 substrate.     

Contribution of Adipose Triglyceride Lipase and Hormone-sensitive Lipase to Lipolysis in hMADS Adipocytes

Lipolysis is the catabolic pathway by which triglycerides are hydrolyzed into fatty acids. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) have the capacity to hydrolyze in vitro the first ester bond of triglycerides, but their respective contributions to whole cell lipolysis in human adipocytes is unclear. Here, we have investigated the roles of HSL, ATGL, and its coactivator CGI-58 in basal and forskolin-stimulated lipolysis in a human white adipocyte model, the hMADS cells. The hMADS adipocytes express the various components of fatty acid metabolism and show lipolytic capacity similar to primary cultured adipocytes. We show that lipolysis and fatty acid esterification are tightly coupled except in conditions of stimulated lipolysis. Immunocytochemistry experiments revealed that acute forskolin treatment promotes HSL translocation from the cytosol to small lipid droplets and redistribution of ATGL from the cytosol and large lipid droplets to small lipid droplets, resulting in enriched colocalization of the two lipases. HSL or ATGL overexpression resulted in increased triglyceride-specific hydrolase capacity, but only ATGL overexpression increased whole cell lipolysis. HSL silencing had no effect on basal lipolysis and only partially reduced forskolin-stimulated lipolysis. Conversely, silencing of ATGL or CGI-58 significantly reduced basal lipolysis and essentially abolished forskolin-stimulated lipolysis. Altogether, these results suggest that ATGL/CGI-58 acts independently of HSL and precedes its action in the sequential hydrolysis of triglycerides in human hMADS adipocytes.Adipose tissue fat stores in humans are mainly dependent upon fatty acid (FA)² supply, FA esterification to triglycerides (TG), and TG breakdown, or lipolysis. Adipose tissue lipolysis is governed by three lipases. Adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) and hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) both have the capacity to initiate TG degradation by cleaving the first ester bond, but HSL is unique in its capacity to break down the second ester bond, converting diglycerides (DG) to monoglycerides (1–3). The non-rate-limiting monoglyceride lipase completes lipolysis by cleaving the last ester bond from a monoglyceride molecule, leading to glycerol release (4). Adipose tissue lipolysis has received much attention over the past 10 years because of its altered regulation in obesity (5).HSL resides freely in the cytosol and can associate with lipid droplets (LD). It is regulated by hormones such as catecholamines, insulin, and natriuretic peptides. Catecholamines bind to β-adrenoceptors on adipocyte cell membranes and activate cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Similarly, natriuretic peptides bind to type A receptors and activate cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase (6). The protein kinase action in stimulated lipolysis is 2-fold: 1) phosphorylation of HSL, leading to its translocation from the cytosol to LD (7, 8), and 2) phosphorylation of perilipin A (6, 9, 10), the predominant perilipin isoform in adipocytes, enhancing interaction between HSL and LD. The importance of HSL activity in stimulating complete lipolysis is indisputable, particularly given its unique capacity to hydrolyze DG. However, lipolysis is not exclusively dependent upon HSL because HSL null mice revealed residual TG lipase activity in adipose tissue (2, 11). Another adipose tissue lipase was identified (3, 12, 13). ATGL, also known as desnutrin or patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 2, shows affinity toward TG only (3, 14). ATGL is activated by CGI-58, an esterase/thioesterase/lipase subfamily protein devoid of TG hydrolase enzymatic activity (15, 16). The role of HSL and ATGL has been investigated in murine fat cell lipolysis, but the relative importance of these lipases in basal and protein kinase A-stimulated human fat cell lipolysis has remained elusive.Increased fat mass is associated with defects in adipose tissue metabolism. In obesity, resistance to catecholamine-induced lipolysis is observed (17–19). This inhibition of lipolysis may be naturally occurring as an adaptive protective mechanism to minimize FA release and its deleterious consequences on metabolism. Indeed, decreased expression of HSL and ATGL has been observed in isolated adipocytes and differentiated preadipocytes of obese subjects and adipose tissue of insulin-resistant subjects, respectively (20–23). However, by virtue of its mass, adipose tissue basal lipolysis elevates circulating levels of FAs in obese subjects, thereby increasing the risk of insulin resistance. Therefore, the use of pharmacological lipid-lowering agents that act through inhibition of lipolysis has been a promising research avenue leading to the development of several series of HSL inhibitors (24).Herein, we sought to examine the respective contributions of HSL and ATGL to lipolysis and re-esterification in fat cells derived from human adipose tissue derived-multipotent stem cells (termed hMADS cells). These cells, which exhibit at a clonal level normal karyotype, self-renewal ability, and no tumorigenicity, are able to differentiate into functional adipocytes (25, 26). We investigated the localization of HSL and ATGL in basal and stimulated lipolytic conditions and studied lipase activities and whole cell lipolysis in adipocytes with altered expression levels of HSL, ATGL, and its coactivator CGI-58. Our results provide novel insights into ATGL localization and its critical role with coactivator CGI-58 in DG provision to HSL during basal and stimulated lipolysis.     

Inflammasome-dependent Caspase-1 Activation in Cervical Epithelial Cells Stimulates Growth of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis

Inflammasomes have been extensively characterized in monocytes and macrophages, but not in epithelial cells, which are the preferred host cells for many pathogens. Here we show that cervical epithelial cells express a functional inflammasome. Infection of the cells by Chlamydia trachomatis leads to activation of caspase-1, through a process requiring the NOD-like receptor family member NLRP3 and the inflammasome adaptor protein ASC. Secretion of newly synthesized virulence proteins from the chlamydial vacuole through a type III secretion apparatus results in efflux of K⁺ through glibenclamide-sensitive K⁺ channels, which in turn stimulates production of reactive oxygen species. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species are responsible for NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation in the infected cells. In monocytes and macrophages, caspase-1 is involved in processing and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β. However, in epithelial cells, which are not known to secrete large quantities of interleukin-1β, caspase-1 has been shown previously to enhance lipid metabolism. Here we show that, in cervical epithelial cells, caspase-1 activation is required for optimal growth of the intracellular chlamydiae.Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of bacterial sexually transmitted disease in the United States, and it is the leading cause of preventable blindness in the world (1–5). Untreated, C. trachomatis infection in women can cause pelvic inflammatory disease, which can lead to infertility and ectopic pregnancy because of scarring of the ovaries and the Fallopian tubes (6). Infection by the lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)² strain of C. trachomatis, which has become more common in North America and Europe (7, 8), is characterized by swelling and inflammation of the lymph nodes in the groin (9).Chlamydiae are intracellular pathogens that preferentially infect epithelial mucosa and have a biphasic infection cycle (10). A metabolically inactive form, the elementary body, infects the epithelial host cells through entry vesicles that avoid fusion with host cell lysosomes and develop into a membrane-bound inclusion (11–13). Despite their intravacuolar localization, chlamydiae are still able to acquire nutrients from the host cell and interact with host-cell signaling pathways (13–23). Within a few hours, the elementary bodies differentiate into larger, metabolically active reticulate bodies, which proliferate but are noninfectious. Depending on the strain of C. trachomatis, the reticulate bodies transform back into elementary bodies after 1–3 days and are released into the extracellular medium to infect other cells (11, 24, 25). Chlamydial species possess a type III secretion (T3S) system that secretes bacterial virulence factors into host cell cytosol and may control interactions between the inclusion and host-cell compartments (26).Long before the adaptive immune response is activated, infected epithelial cells produce proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (27), which recruit neutrophils to the site of infection and activate other immune effector cells. However, in many cases the immune system fails to clear the infection, and the chronic release of cytokines becomes a major contributor to the scarring and damage associated with the infection (28–30).The innate immune response during C. trachomatis infection is initiated by chlamydial pathogen-associated molecular patterns, including lipopolysaccharides, which bind to pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors and cytosolic NOD-like receptors (NLRs), ultimately promoting pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression and secretion of the cytokine proteins (31–37). However, secretion of the key pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β is tightly regulated (38). First, pro-IL-1β is produced following activation of pattern recognition receptor, and the precursor is then cleaved into the mature form by the pro-inflammatory cysteine protease, caspase-1 (also known as interleukin-1 converting enzyme or ICE). The mechanism by which caspase-1 is activated in response to infection or tissue damage was found to be modulated by a macromolecular protein complex termed the “inflammasome,” which consists of an NLR family member, an adaptor protein (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation recruitment domain or ASC), and an inactive caspase-1 precursor (pro-caspase-1) (39, 40). Previous studies demonstrated that IL-1β is produced in response to chlamydial infection in dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes (41–44). Moreover, C. trachomatis or Chlamydia caviae infection activates caspase-1 in epithelial cells or monocytes (43, 45, 46). However, whether caspase-1 activation during chlamydial infection requires the formation of an inflammasome remains unclear.Previous studies have shown that different pathogens can cause inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation in macrophages and monocytes (47). However, epithelial cells lining mucosal surfaces are not only the preferred target for chlamydial infection and other intracellular pathogens but also play an important role in early host immune response to infection by secreting proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (27). Although epithelial cells are not known to secrete large amounts of IL-1β, inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation in epithelial cells is known to contribute to lipid metabolism and membrane regeneration in epithelial cells damaged by the membrane-disrupting toxin, aerolysin (48). As lipids are sorted from the Golgi apparatus to the chlamydial inclusion (13, 15, 49), we therefore investigated whether C. trachomatis induces caspase-1 activation in epithelial cells via the assembly of an inflammasome. We demonstrated that C. trachomatis-induced caspase-1 activation is mediated by an inflammasome containing the NLR member, NLRP3. Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of T3S apparatus in inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation by different pathogens in macrophages and monocytes (50–56). Therefore, we further investigated the mechanism by which C. trachomatis triggers the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Our results showed that metabolically active chlamydiae, relying on their T3S apparatus, cause K⁺ efflux, which in turn leads to formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ultimately NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation. Epithelial cells do not typically secrete large amounts of IL-1β; instead, caspase-1 activation in cervical epithelial cells contributes to development of the chlamydial inclusion.