In Vitro Characterization of a Recombinant Blh Protein from an Uncultured Marine Bacterium as a ��-Carotene 15,15��-Dioxygenase

Codon optimization was used to synthesize the blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 for expression in Escherichia coli. The expressed enzyme cleaved β-carotene at its central double bond (15,15′) to yield two molecules of all-trans-retinal. The molecular mass of the native purified enzyme was ∼64 kDa as a dimer of 32-kDa subunits. The K_m, k_cat, and k_cat/K_m values for β-carotene as substrate were 37 μm, 3.6 min⁻¹, and 97 mm⁻¹ min⁻¹, respectively. The enzyme exhibited the highest activity for β-carotene, followed by β-cryptoxanthin, β-apo-4′-carotenal, α-carotene, and γ-carotene in decreasing order, but not for β-apo-8′-carotenal, β-apo-12′-carotenal, lutein, zeaxanthin, or lycopene, suggesting that the presence of one unsubstituted β-ionone ring in a substrate with a molecular weight greater than C₃₅ seems to be essential for enzyme activity. The oxygen atom of retinal originated not from water but from molecular oxygen, suggesting that the enzyme was a β-carotene 15,15′-dioxygenase. Although the Blh protein and β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases catalyzed the same biochemical reaction, the Blh protein was unrelated to the mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases as assessed by their different properties, including DNA and amino acid sequences, molecular weight, form of association, reaction mechanism, kinetic properties, and substrate specificity. This is the first report of in vitro characterization of a bacterial β-carotene-cleaving enzyme.Vitamin A (retinol) is a fat-soluble vitamin and important for human health. In vivo, the cleavage of β-carotene to retinal is an important step of vitamin A synthesis. The cleavage can proceed via two different biochemical pathways (1, 2). The major pathway is a central cleavage catalyzed by mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases (EC 1.14.99.36). β-Carotene is cleaved by the enzyme symmetrically into two molecules of all-trans-retinal, and retinal is then converted to vitamin A in vivo (3–5). The second pathway is an eccentric cleavage that occurs at double bonds other than the central 15,15′-double bond of β-carotene to produce β-apo-carotenals with different chain lengths, which are catalyzed by carotenoid oxygenases from mammals, plants, and cyanobacteria (6). These β-apo-carotenals are degraded to one molecule of retinal, which is subsequently converted to vitamin A in vivo (2).β-Carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase was first isolated as a cytosolic enzyme by identifying the product of β-carotene cleavage as retinal (7). The characterization of the enzyme and the reaction pathway from β-carotene to retinal were also investigated (4, 8). The enzyme activity has been found in mammalian intestinal mucosa, jejunum enterocytes, liver, lung, kidney, and brain (5, 9, 10). Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenase have been reported from various species, including chickens (11), fruit flies (12), humans (13), mice (14), and zebra fishes (15).Other proteins thought to convert β-carotene to retinal include bacterioopsin-related protein (Brp) and bacteriorhodopsin-related protein-like homolog protein (Blh) (16). Brp protein is expressed from the bop gene cluster, which encodes the structural protein bacterioopsin, consisting of at least three genes as follows: bop (bacterioopsin), brp (bacteriorhodopsin-related protein), and bat (bacterioopsin activator) (17). brp genes were reported in Haloarcula marismortui (18), Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (19), Halobacterium halobium (17), Haloquadratum walsbyi, and Salinibacter ruber (20). Blh protein is expressed from the proteorhodopsin gene cluster, which contains proteorhodopsin, crtE (geranylgeranyl-diphosphate synthase), crtI (phytoene dehydrogenase), crtB (phytoene synthase), crtY (lycopene cyclase), idi (isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase), and blh gene (21). Sources of blh genes were previously reported in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (19), Haloarcula marismortui (18), Halobacterium salinarum (22), uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 (16), and uncultured marine bacterium HF10 49E08 (21). β-Carotene biosynthetic genes crtE, crtB, crtI, crtY, ispA, and idi encode the enzymes necessary for the synthesis of β-carotene from isopentenyl diphosphate, and the Idi, IspA, CrtE, CrtB, CrtI, and CrtY proteins have been characterized in vitro (23–28). Blh protein has been proposed to catalyze or regulate the conversion of β-carotene to retinal (29, 30), but there is no direct proof of the enzymatic activity.In this study, we used codon optimization to synthesize the blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 for expression in Escherichia coli, and we performed a detailed biochemical and enzymological characterization of the expressed Blh protein. In addition, the properties of the enzyme were compared with those of mammalian β-carotene 15,15′-monooxygenases.     

Repeated Domains of Leptospira Immunoglobulin-like Proteins Interact with Elastin and Tropoelastin

Leptospira spp., the causative agents of leptospirosis, adhere to components of the extracellular matrix, a pivotal role for colonization of host tissues during infection. Previously, we and others have shown that Leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins (Lig) of Leptospira spp. bind to fibronectin, laminin, collagen, and fibrinogen. In this study, we report that Leptospira can be immobilized by human tropoelastin (HTE) or elastin from different tissues, including lung, skin, and blood vessels, and that Lig proteins can bind to HTE or elastin. Moreover, both elastin and HTE bind to the same LigB immunoglobulin-like domains, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12 as demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and competition ELISAs. The LigB immunoglobulin-like domain binds to the 17th to 27th exons of HTE (17–27HTE) as determined by ELISA (LigBCon4, K_D = 0.50 μm; LigBCen7′–8, K_D = 0.82 μm; LigBCen9, K_D = 1.54 μm; and LigBCen12, K_D = 0.73 μm). The interaction of LigBCon4 and 17–27HTE was further confirmed by steady state fluorescence spectroscopy (K_D = 0.49 μm) and ITC (K_D = 0.54 μm). Furthermore, the binding was enthalpy-driven and affected by environmental pH, indicating it is a charge-charge interaction. The binding affinity of LigBCon4D341N to 17–27HTE was 4.6-fold less than that of wild type LigBCon4. In summary, we show that Lig proteins of Leptospira spp. interact with elastin and HTE, and we conclude this interaction may contribute to Leptospira adhesion to host tissues during infection.Pathogenic Leptospira spp. are spirochetes that cause leptospirosis, a serious infectious disease of people and animals (1, 2). Weil syndrome, the severe form of leptospiral infection, leads to multiorgan damage, including liver failure (jaundice), renal failure (nephritis), pulmonary hemorrhage, meningitis, abortion, and uveitis (3, 4). Furthermore, this disease is not only prevalent in many developing countries, it is reemerging in the United States (3). Although leptospirosis is a serious worldwide zoonotic disease, the pathogenic mechanisms of Leptospira infection remain enigmatic. Recent breakthroughs in applying genetic tools to Leptospira may facilitate studies on the molecular pathogenesis of leptospirosis (5–8).The attachment of pathogenic Leptospira spp. to host tissues is critical in the early phase of Leptospira infection. Leptospira spp. adhere to host tissues to overcome mechanical defense systems at tissue surfaces and to initiate colonization of specific tissues, such as the lung, kidney, and liver. Leptospira invade hosts tissues through mucous membranes or injured epidermis, coming in contact with subepithelial tissues. Here, certain bacterial outer surface proteins serve as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs)² to mediate the binding of bacteria to different extracellular matrices (ECMs) of host cells (9). Several leptospiral MSCRAMMs have been identified (10–18), and we speculate that more will be identified in the near future.Lig proteins are distributed on the outer surface of pathogenic Leptospira, and the expression of Lig protein is only found in low passage strains (14, 16, 17), probably induced by environmental cues such as osmotic or temperature changes (19). Lig proteins can bind to fibrinogen and a variety of ECMs, including fibronectin (Fn), laminin, and collagen, thereby mediating adhesion to host cells (20–23). Lig proteins also constitute good vaccine candidates (24–26).Elastin is a component of ECM critical to tissue elasticity and resilience and is abundant in skin, lung, blood vessels, placenta, uterus, and other tissues (27–29). Tropoelastin is the soluble precursor of elastin (28). During the major phase of elastogenesis, multiple tropoelastin molecules associate through coacervation (30–32). Because of the abundance of elastin or tropoelastin on the surface of host cells, several bacterial MSCRAMMs use elastin and/or tropoelastin to mediate adhesion during the infection process (33–35).Because leptospiral infection is known to cause severe pulmonary hemorrhage (36, 37) and abortion (38), we hypothesize that some leptospiral MSCRAMMs may interact with elastin and/or tropoelastin in these elastin-rich tissues. This is the first report that Lig proteins of Leptospira interact with elastin and tropoelastin, and the interactions are mediated by several specific immunoglobulin-like domains of Lig proteins, including LigBCon4, LigBCen7′–8, LigBCen9, and LigBCen12, which bind to the 17th to 27th exons of human tropoelastin (HTE).     

Inactivation of the RNase Activity of Glycoprotein Erns of Classical Swine Fever Virus Results in a Cytopathogenic Virus

Envelope glycoprotein E^rns of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) has been shown to contain RNase activity and is involved in virus infection. Two short regions of amino acids in the sequence of E^rns are responsible for RNase activity. In both regions, histidine residues appear to be essential for catalysis. They were replaced by lysine residues to inactivate the RNase activity. The mutated sequence of E^rns was inserted into the p10 locus of a baculovirus vector and expressed in insect cells. Compared to intact E^rns, the mutated proteins had lost their RNase activity. The mutated proteins reacted with E^rns-specific neutralizing monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies and were still able to inhibit infection of swine kidney cells (SK6) with CSFV, but at a concentration higher than that measured for intact E^rns. This result indicated that the conformation of the mutated proteins was not severely affected by the inactivation. To study the effect of these mutations on virus infection and replication, a CSFV mutant with an inactivated E^rns (FLc13) was generated with an infectious DNA copy of CSFV strain C. The mutant virus showed the same growth kinetics as the parent virus in cell culture. However, in contrast to the parent virus, the RNase-negative virus induced a cytopathic effect in swine kidney cells. This effect could be neutralized by rescue of the inactivated E^rns gene and by neutralizing polyclonal antibodies directed against E^rns, indicating that this effect was an inherent property of the RNase-negative virus. Analyses of cellular DNA of swine kidney cells showed that the RNase-negative CSFV induced apoptosis. We conclude that the RNase activity of envelope protein E^rns plays an important role in the replication of pestiviruses and speculate that this RNase activity might be responsible for the persistence of these viruses in their natural host.Classical swine fever virus (CSFV), bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), and border disease virus belong to the genus Pestivirus within the family Flaviviridae (10). The viruses are structurally, antigenically, and genetically closely related. BVDV and border disease virus can infect ruminants and pigs. CSFV infections are restricted to pigs (6). Pestiviruses are small, enveloped, positive-stranded RNA viruses (23). The genome of pestiviruses varies in length from 12.5 to 16.5 kb (1, 2, 7, 17, 19, 25, 26, 28, 32) and contains a single large open reading frame (ORF) (1, 7, 8, 17, 26). The ORF is translated into a polyprotein which is processed into mature proteins by viral and host cell proteases (30). The envelope of the pestivirus virion contains three glycoproteins, E^rns, E1, and E2 (35). Animals infected with pestiviruses raise antibodies against at least two viral glycoproteins, namely, E^rns and E2 (16, 34, 42). Inhibition studies with E2 and E^rns produced in insect cells showed that both envelope proteins are indispensable for viral attachment and entry of pestiviruses into susceptible cells (13). In the virion, E^rns is present as a homodimer with a molecular mass of about 100 kDa (35). E^rns lacks a membrane anchor, and association with the envelope is accomplished by an as-yet-unknown mechanism. Significant amounts of E^rns are secreted from infected cells (30). A unique feature is that E^rns, besides being an envelope protein, possesses RNase activity (12, 31). E^rns belongs to the family of extracellular RNases consisting of several fungal (e.g., RNase T₂ and Rh) and plant (e.g., S glycoproteins of Nicotiana alata) RNases (12, 31). These RNases contain two homologous regions of 8 amino acids each which are spaced by 38 (E^rns) nonhomologous amino acids and which form the RNase active site. Histidine residues in both regions appear to be essential for RNase catalysis (15).The role of this RNase activity in the replication of pestiviruses or in the pathogenesis of a pestivirus infection is an interesting issue that, as yet, has not been studied. The availability of a recently generated infectious DNA copy of CSFV strain C (24) has given us the opportunity to study the effect of defined mutations in a pestivirus genome. In this paper, we report the inactivation of the RNase activity of E^rns by mutagenesis. To characterize the mutated proteins, we produced large amounts of them in insect cells (12). By reverse genetics, we generated an RNase-negative CSFV recombinant. The effect of the inactivation of the RNase activity of E^rns on the replication of CSFV in vitro was studied.     

Pif1 Helicase Lengthens Some Okazaki Fragment Flaps Necessitating Dna2 Nuclease/Helicase Action in the Two-nuclease Processing Pathway

We have developed a system to reconstitute all of the proposed steps of Okazaki fragment processing using purified yeast proteins and model substrates. DNA polymerase δ was shown to extend an upstream fragment to displace a downstream fragment into a flap. In most cases, the flap was removed by flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), in a reaction required to remove initiator RNA in vivo. The nick left after flap removal could be sealed by DNA ligase I to complete fragment joining. An alternative pathway involving FEN1 and the nuclease/helicase Dna2 has been proposed for flaps that become long enough to bind replication protein A (RPA). RPA binding can inhibit FEN1, but Dna2 can shorten RPA-bound flaps so that RPA dissociates. Recent reconstitution results indicated that Pif1 helicase, a known component of fragment processing, accelerated flap displacement, allowing the inhibitory action of RPA. In results presented here, Pif1 promoted DNA polymerase δ to displace strands that achieve a length to bind RPA, but also to be Dna2 substrates. Significantly, RPA binding to long flaps inhibited the formation of the final ligation products in the reconstituted system without Dna2. However, Dna2 reversed that inhibition to restore efficient ligation. These results suggest that the two-nuclease pathway is employed in cells to process long flap intermediates promoted by Pif1.Eukaryotic cellular DNA is replicated semi-conservatively in the 5′ to 3′ direction. A leading strand is synthesized by DNA polymerase ϵ in a continuous manner in the direction of opening of the replication fork (1, 2). A lagging strand is synthesized by DNA polymerase δ (pol δ)³ in the opposite direction in a discontinuous manner, producing segments called Okazaki fragments (3). These stretches of ∼150 nucleotides (nt) must be joined together to create the continuous daughter strand. DNA polymerase α/primase (pol α) initiates each fragment by synthesizing an RNA/DNA primer consisting of ∼1-nt of RNA and ∼10–20 nt of DNA (4). The sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is loaded on the DNA by replication factor C (RFC). pol δ then complexes with PCNA and extends the primer. When pol δ reaches the 5′-end of the downstream Okazaki fragment, it displaces the end into a flap while continuing synthesis, a process known as strand displacement (5, 6). These flap intermediates are cleaved by nucleases to produce a nick for DNA ligase I (LigI) to seal, completing the DNA strand.In one proposed mechanism for flap processing, the only required nuclease is flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). pol δ displaces relatively short flaps, which are cleaved by FEN1 as they are created, leaving a nick for LigI (7–9). FEN1 binds at the 5′-end of the flap and tracks down the flap cleaving only at the base (5, 10, 11). Because pol δ favors the displacement of RNA-DNA hybrids over DNA-DNA hybrids, strand displacement generally is limited to that of the initiator RNA of an Okazaki fragment (12). In addition, the tightly coordinated action of pol δ and FEN1 also tends to keep flaps short. However, biochemical reconstitution studies demonstrate that some flaps can become long (13, 14). Once these flaps reach ∼30 nt, they can be bound by the eukaryotic single strand binding protein replication protein A (RPA) (15). Binding by RPA to a flap substrate inhibits cleavage by FEN1 (16). The RPA-bound flap would then require another mechanism for proper processing.This second mechanism is proposed to utilize Dna2 (16) in addition to FEN1. Dna2 is both a 5′-3′ helicase and an endonuclease (17, 18). Like FEN1, Dna2 recognizes 5′-flap structures, binding at the 5′-end of the flap and tracking downward toward the base (19, 20). Unlike FEN1, Dna2 cleaves the flap multiple times but not all the way to the base, such that a short flap remains (20). RPA binding to a flap has been shown to stimulate Dna2 cleavage (16). Therefore, if a flap becomes long enough to bind RPA, Dna2 binds and cleaves it to a length of 5–10 nucleotides from which RPA dissociates (21). FEN1 can then enter the flap, displace the Dna2, and then cleave at the base to make the nick for ligation (16, 18, 22). The need for this mechanism may be one reason why DNA2 is an essential gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (23, 24). It has been proposed that, in the absence of Dna2, flaps that become long enough to bind RPA cannot be properly processed, leading to genomic instability and cell death (23).In reconstitution of Okazaki fragment processing with purified proteins, even though some flaps became long enough to bind RPA, FEN1 was very effective at cleaving essentially all of the generated flaps (13, 14). Evidently, FEN1 could engage the flaps before binding of RPA. However, these reconstitution assays did not include the 5′-3′ helicase Pif1 (25, 26). Pif1 is involved in telomeric and mitochondrial DNA maintenance (26) and was first implicated in Okazaki fragment processing from genetic studies in S. cerevisiae. Deletion of PIF1 rescued the lethality of dna2Δ, although the double mutant was still temperature-sensitive (27). The authors of this report proposed that Pif1 creates a need for Dna2 by promoting longer flaps. Further supporting this conclusion, deletion of POL32, which encodes the subunit of pol δ that interacts with PCNA, rescued the temperature sensitivity of the dna2Δpif1Δ double mutant (12, 27). Importantly, pol δ exhibited reduced strand displacement activity when POL32 was deleted (12, 28, 29). The combination of pif1Δ and pol32Δ is believed to create a situation in which virtually no long flaps are formed, eliminating the requirement for Dna2 flap cleavage (27).We recently performed reconstitution assays showing that Pif1 can assist in the creation of long flaps. Inclusion of Pif1, in the absence of RPA, increased the proportion of flaps that lengthened to ∼28–32 nt before FEN1 cleavage (14). With the addition of RPA, the appearance of these long flap cleavage products was suppressed. Evidently, Pif1 promoted such rapid flap lengthening that RPA bound some flaps before FEN1 and inhibited cleavage. The RPA-bound flaps would presumably require cleavage by Dna2 for proper processing.Only a small fraction of flaps became long with Pif1. However, there are hundreds of thousands of Okazaki fragments processed per replication cycle (30). Therefore, thousands of flaps are expected to be lengthened by Pif1 in vivo, a number significant enough that improper processing of such flaps could lead to cell death.Our goal here was to determine whether Pif1 can influence the flow of Okazaki fragments through the two proposed pathways. We first questioned whether Pif1 stimulates strand displacement synthesis by pol δ. Next, we asked whether Pif1 lengthens short flaps so that Dna2 can bind and cleave. Finally, we used a complete reconstitution system to determine whether Pif1 promotes creation of RPA-bound flaps that require cleavage by both Dna2 and FEN1 before they can be ligated. Our results suggest that Pif1 promotes the two-nuclease pathway, and reveal the mechanisms involved.     

Binding and Cleavage Specificities of Human Argonaute2

The endonuclease Argonaute2 (Ago2) mediates the degradation of the target mRNA within the RNA-induced silencing complex. We determined the binding and cleavage properties of recombinant human Ago2. Human Ago2 was unable to cleave preformed RNA duplexes and exhibited weaker binding affinity for RNA duplexes compared with the single strand RNA. The enzyme exhibited greater RNase H activity in the presence of Mn²⁺ compared with Mg²⁺. Human Ago2 exhibited weaker binding affinities and reduced cleavage activities for antisense RNAs with either a 5′-terminal hydroxyl or abasic nucleotide. Binding kinetics suggest that the 5′-terminal heterocycle base nucleates the interaction between the enzyme and the antisense RNA, and the 5′-phosphate stabilizes the interaction. Mn²⁺ ameliorated the effects of the 5′-terminal hydroxyl or abasic nucleotide on Ago2 cleavage activity and binding affinity. Nucleotide substitutions at the 3′ terminus of the antisense RNA had no effect on human Ago2 cleavage activity, whereas 2′-methoxyethyl substitutions at position 2 reduced binding and cleavage activity and 12–14 reduced the cleavage activity. RNase protection assays indicated that human Ago2 interacts with the first 14 nucleotides at the 5′-pole of the antisense RNA. Human Ago2 preloaded with the antisense RNA exhibited greater binding affinities for longer sense RNAs suggesting that the enzyme interacts with regions in the sense RNA outside the site for antisense hybridization. Finally, transiently expressed human Ago2 immunoprecipitated from HeLa cells contained the double strand RNA-binding protein human immunodeficiency virus, type 1, trans-activating response RNA-binding protein, and deletion mutants of Ago2 showed that trans-activating response RNA-binding protein interacts with the PIWI domain of the enzyme.RNA interference is a mechanism by which double-stranded RNA triggers the loss of RNA of homologous sequence (1). Long double strand RNAs are processed by the double strand endonuclease Dicer into short RNA duplexes (siRNA)² ranging from 21 to 23 nucleotides in length (2). The double strand RNA-binding proteins Dicer and human immunodeficiency virus, type 1, trans-activating response RNA-binding protein (TRBP) transfer the siRNAs to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) (3). The antisense strand of the siRNA binds to the RISC endonuclease Argonaute 2 (Ago2), which then cleaves the target mRNA at a single phosphodiester bond bridging the ribonucleotides opposing the 10th and 11th nucleotide from the 5′ terminus of the antisense strand (4–11).The structure-activity relationships of siRNAs in human cultured cells have been studied extensively, but these types of studies offer few insights into the underlying mechanisms contributing to the observed activities of the siRNA and, in particular, their interaction with the RISC endonuclease human Ago2. Surprisingly, the little that is known about the interaction between human Ago2 and the substrate comes from a single report describing the preliminary characterization of recombinant human Ago2 (11). Specifically, human Ago2 cleavage activity was magnesium-dependent, and the antisense RNA containing a phosphate at the 5′ terminus exhibited greater cleavage activity compared with the antisense RNA with a 5′-hydroxyl. The enzyme was unable to cleave a DNA target or use a DNA antisense strand to trigger the cleavage of a complementary RNA (11). In addition, UV cross-linking experiments showed that single strand but not double strand RNA was able to cross-link with the recombinant enzyme. Finally, unlike RISC activity from cellular extracts, which has been shown to catalyze multiple rounds of cleavage, recombinant Ago2 exhibited single-turnover kinetics (11, 12).The architecture of the human Ago2 protein consists of a PIWI domain at the amino terminus, a centrally located Mid domain and a PAZ domain at the carboxyl terminus (13–17). The PIWI domain constitutes the catalytic domain of the enzyme and exhibits a three-dimensional structure similar to RNase H, sharing the same aspartic acid-aspartic acid-glutamic acid (DDE) catalytic triad and metal cofactor requirements (10, 16, 17). Recently, the structures of argonaute from Thermus thermophilus and Archaeoglobus fulgidus bound to the antisense strand have been solved (15, 18). The structures show that the PAZ, Mid, and PIWI domains form an extended nucleic acid binding surface for the antisense strand. In addition, a basic binding pocket positioned within the Mid domain and a basic cleft in the PIWI domain were shown to bind, respectively, the 5′-terminal phosphate and the backbone at the 5′-pole of the antisense strand (15, 18). Aside from the two 3′-terminal nucleotides of the antisense strand, which were shown to bind a hydrophobic pocket within the PAZ domain, no interactions were observed between the enzyme and the 3′-pole of the antisense strand. An important difference between the structures of the two prokaryotic proteins was that the A. fulgidus protein contained a tyrosine residue positioned in the basic binding pocket, which formed a stacking interaction with the heterocycle base of the 5′-terminal nucleotide in the antisense strand. The human Ago2 protein appears to differ significantly from the prokaryotic argonaute proteins in that the key amino acids that make up the nucleic acid binding surface of the prokaryotic proteins are not conserved in the human enzyme. Consequently, the structures of the prokaryotic proteins appear to offer limited insights into the interaction between the human enzyme and the antisense strand of the siRNA.Given that Ago2 is responsible for the siRNA-mediated cleavage of the target RNA, understanding the properties important for the interaction between the antisense strand and Ago2 could lead to the identification of siRNA configurations with improved potency. To better understand the substrate specificity of human Ago2, we determined the cleavage activities, binding affinities, and binding kinetics of human Ago2 for various antisense oligonucleotides. The antisense oligonucleotides were designed to evaluate the interaction between human Ago2 and various regions in the antisense RNA, including the 5′ and 3′ termini and 2′-hydroxyl. The activities and binding affinities were compared for two different preparations of the enzyme as follows: a human Ago2 protein containing a glutathione S-transferase tag (GST-Ago2) that was expressed in insect cells and purified to homogeneity and an HA-tagged protein that was expressed in HeLa cells and immunoprecipitated with HA antibody (HA-Ago2). In addition, we evaluated the effects of divalent cation metals on the substrate specificity of human Ago2. Finally, we identified endogenous TRBP in the immunoprecipitated HA-Ago2 preparation and demonstrated using deletion mutants that the PIWI domain of Ago2 interacts with TRBP.