Complex rearrangements of chromosome 15 in two patients with mild/atypical Prader Willi syndrome

Multiple mechanisms are responsible for the development of Prader Willi syndrome (PWS), the most common genetic cause of obesity in childhood. Molecular findings are usually deletions and uniparental disomy (UPD) of the 15q11-13 region. Rarely, structural rearrangements of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 15 are also detected. Two cases with mild PWS phenotype and complex maternal UPD identified by microsatellite analysis are described: the first patient had uniparental iso and heterodisomy and the second displayed biallelic inheritance and uniparental isodisomy.     

A molecular and cytogenetic study in Finnish Prader-Willi patients

The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a developmental disorder caused by a deficiency of paternal contributions, arising from differently sized deletions, uniparental disomy or rare imprinting mutations, in the chromosome region 15q11–q13. We studied 41 patients with suspected PWS and their parents using cytogenetic and molecular techniques. Of the 27 clinically typical PWS patients, 23 (85%) had a molecular deletion that could be classified into four size categories. Only 15 of them (71%) could be detected cytogenetically. Maternal uniparental heterodisomy was observed in four cases. The rest of the patients showed no molecular defects including rare imprinting mutations. In our experience, the use of the methylation test with the probe PW71 (D15S63), together with the probe hN4HS (SNRPN), which distinguishes between a deletion and uniparental disomy, is the method of choice for the diagnosis of PWS.     

Bloom Syndrome and Maternal Uniparental Disomy for Chromosome 15

Bloom syndrome (BS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by increases in the frequency of sister-chromatid exchange and in the incidence of malignancy. Chromosome-transfer studies have shown the BS locus to map to chromosome 15q. This report describes a subject with features of both BS and Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Molecular analysis showed maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 15. Meiotic recombination between the two disomic chromosomes 15 has resulted in heterodisomy for proximal 15q and isodisomy for distal 15q. In this individual BS is probably due to homozygosity for a gene that is telomeric to D15S95 (15q25), rather than to genetic imprinting, the mechanism responsible for the development of PWS. This report represents the first application of disomy analysis to the regional localization of a disease gene. This strategy promises to be useful in the genetic mapping of other uncommon autosomal recessive conditions.     

Relaxation of imprinting in Prader-Willi syndrome

We describe two Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients who exhibit maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 15 and unusual patterns of gene expression and DNA replication. Both were diagnosed during infancy as having PWS; however, their growth and development were atypical compared with others with this condition. Weight was below normal in the first patient, and height and development were within normal limits in the second individual. Hyperphagia and polyphagia were not evident in either patient. Genotypes at multiple genomic loci, allele-specific methylation, gene expression, and DNA replication were analyzed at D15S9 [ZNF127], D15S63 [PW71], SNRPN, PAR5, IPW, and D15S10 in these patients. The maternal imprint (based on the absence of gene expression, synchronous replication, and methylation of both alleles) was retained at SNRPN in these patients, as is the case in others with UPD. By contrast, cells from the first individual expressed PAR5 and ZNF127, whereas the second expressed a single IPW allele. Asynchronous DNA replication was observed in both patients at all loci, except SNRPN. These findings show that a subset of imprinted genes can be transcribed in some PWS patients with maternal UPD and that asynchronous DNA replication is coordinated with this pattern of gene expression. Relaxed imprinting in these patients is consistent with their milder phenotype. Received: 19 June 1998 / Accepted: 2 October 1998     

A DNA methylation imprint, determined by the sex of the parent, distinguishes the angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes

The Angelman (AS) and Prader-Willi (PWS) syndromes are two clinically distinct disorders that are caused by a differential parental origin of chromosome 15q11-q13 deletions. Both also can result from uniparental disomy (the inheritance of both copies of chromosome 15 from only one parent). Loss of the paternal copy of 15q11-q13, whether by deletion or maternal uniparental disomy, leads to PWS, whereas a maternal deletion or paternal uniparental disomy leads to AS. The differential modification in expression of certain mammalian genes dependent upon parental origin is known as genomic imprinting, and AS and PWS represent the best examples of this phenomenon in humans. Although the molecular mechanisms of genomic imprinting are unknown, DNA methylation has been postulated to play a role in the imprinting process. Using restriction digests with the methyl-sensitive enzymes HpaII and HhaI and probing Southern blots with several genomic and cDNA probes, we have systematically scanned segments of 15q11-q13 for DNA methylation differences between patients with PWS (20 deletion, 20 uniparental disomy) and those with AS (26 deletion, 1 uniparental disomy). The highly evolutionarily conserved cDNA, DN34, identifies distinct differences in DNA methylation of the parental alleles at the D15S9 locus. Thus, DNA methylation may be used as a reliable, postnatal diagnostic tool in these syndromes. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the first known epigenetic event, dependent on the sex of the parent, for a locus within 15q11-q13. We propose that expression of the gene detected by DN34 is regulated by genomic imprinting and, therefore, that it is a candidate gene for PWS and/or AS.     

Routine screening for microdeletions by FISH in 77 patients suspected of having Prader-Willi or Angelman syndromes using YAC clone 273A2 (D15S10)

About 70% of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) have a common interstitial de novo microdeletion encompassing paternal (PWS) or maternal (AS) loci D15S9 to D15S12. Most of the non-deletion PWS patients and a small number of non-deletion AS patients have a maternal or paternal uniparental disomy (UPD)15, respectively. Other chromosome 15 rearrangements and a few smaller atypical deletions, some of the latter being associated with an abnormal methylation pattern, are rarely found. Molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis have both been used to diagnose PWS and AS. Here, we have evaluated, in a typical routine cytogenetic laboratory setting, the efficiency of a diagnostic strategy that starts with a FISH deletion assay using Alu-PCR (polymerase chain reaction)-amplified D15S10-positive yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) 273A2. We performed FISH in 77 patients suspected of having PWS (n = 66) or AS (n = 11) and compared the results with those from classical cytogenetics and wherever possible with those from DNA analysis. A FISH deletion was found in 16/66 patients from the PWS group and in 3/11 patients from the AS group. One example of a centromere 15 co-hybridization performed in order to exclude cryptic translocations or inversions is given. Of the PWS patients, 14 fulfilled Holm’s criteria, but two did not. DNA analysis confirmed the commmon deletion in all patients screened by the D15S63 methylation test and in restriction fragment length polymorphism dosage blots. In 3/58 non-deletion patients, other chromosomal aberrations were found. Of the non-deleted group, 27 subjects (24 PWS, 3 AS) were tested molecularly, and three patients with an uniparental methylation pattern were found in the PWS group. The other 24/27 subjects had neither a FISH deletion nor uniparental methylation, but two had other cytogenetic aberrations. Given that cytogenetic analysis is indispensable in most patients, we find that the FISH deletion assay with YAC 273A2 is an efficient first step for stepwise diagnostic testing and mutation-type analysis of patients suspected of having PWS or AS. Received: 14 November 1995     

Somatic recombination rather than uniparental disomy suggested as another mechanism by which genetic imprinting may play a role in the etiology of Prader-Willi syndrome

Summary Six Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients with normal karyotypes and their parents were analyzed to determine the nature of the molecular aberrations present in the proximal region of 15q and to determine the parental origin of the aberrant chromosome 15. In addition, the likehood that uniparental disomy plays a significant role in the etiology of PWS patients with normal karyotypes was studied. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) recognized by seven probes [pML34 (D15S9), pTD3-21, pCGS0.9, pCGS1.1 (D15S10), IR4.3 (D15S11), IR10.1 (DS15S12), p189-1 (D15S13), IR39 (D15S18), and CMW-1 (D15S24)] mapping to the Prader-Willi chromosome region (PWCR) and an additional two probes [pMS1-14 (D15S1); the cDNA of neuromedin B] mapping elsewhere on chromosome 15 were analyzed in the six PWS patients and their parents. Copy number of each locus within the PWCR was determined by densitometry. Molecular rearrangements of the proximal region of 15q were observed in all of the six probands and the origin of the aberrant chromosome 15 when determined was consistently paternal in origin. While data obtained from our six patients does not support the mechanism of disomy, results obtained from three of the six patients show more complex rearrangements hypothesized to have resulted from somatic recombination. These rearrangements have resulted in acquired homozygosity and the lack of a paternal allele at various loci within the PWCR. The presence of only a maternal contribution at certain loci as the result of somatic recombination may be another mechanism by which genetic imprinting plays a role in the presentation of the PWS phenotype.     

Combined cytogenetic and molecular analyses for the diagnosis of Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes

Prader-Willi (PWS) and Angelman (AS) are syndromes of developmental impairment that result from the loss of expression of imprinted genes in the paternal (PWS) or maternal (AS) 15q11-q13 chromosome. Diagnosis on a clinical basis is difficult in newborns and young infants; thus, a suitable molecular test capable of revealing chromosomal abnormalities is required. We used a variety of cytogenetic and molecular approaches, such as, chromosome G banding, fluorescent in situ hybridization, a DNA methylation test, and a set of chromosome 15 DNA polymorphisms to characterize a cohort of 27 PWS patients and 24 suspected AS patients. Molecular analysis enabled the reliable diagnosis of 14 PWS and 7 AS patients, and their classification into four groups: (A) 6 of these 14 PWS subjects (44 %) had deletions of paternal 15q11-q13; (B) 4 of the 7 AS patients had deletions of maternal 15q11-q13; (C) one PWS patient (8 %) had a maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 15; (D) the remaining reliably diagnoses of 7 PWS and 3 AS cases showed abnormal methylation patterns of 15q11-q13 chromosome, but none of the alterations shown by the above groups, although they may have harbored deletions undetected by the markers used. This study highlights the importance of using a combination of cytogenetic and molecular tests for a reliable diagnosis of PWS or AS, and for the identification of genetic alterations.     

Prader-Willi syndrome: genetic tests and clinical findings

Here we describe the genetic studies performed in 53 patients with the suspected diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). PWS is characterized by neonatal hypotonia, hypogonadism, delayed psychomotor development, hyperphagia, obesity, short stature, small hands and feet, learning disabilities, and obsessive-compulsive behavior. Through the methylation analysis of the SNRPN gene, microsatellite studies of loci mapped within and outside the PWS/AS region, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study, we confirmed the diagnosis in 35 patients: 27 with a paternal deletion, and 8 with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD). The clinical comparisons between deleted and UPD patients indicated that there were no major phenotype differences, except for a lower birth length observed in the UPD children. Our sample was composed of more girls than boys; UPD patients were diagnosed earlier than the deleted cohort (2(10/12) s. 7(9/12) years); and, in the deleted group, the boys were diagnosed earlier than the girls (5(2/12) vs. 7(8/12) years, respectively).     

Clinical outcome and follow-up of the first reported case of Russell-Silver syndrome with the unique combination of maternal uniparental heterodisomy 7 and mosaic trisomy 7

BACKGROUND: Russell-Silver syndrome (RSS) has been associated with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosome 7 although the etiology of the syndrome is still unknown. Cases of RSS associated with maternal UPD7 have involved isodisomies, heterodisomies, and mixed isodisomy with heterodisomy simultaneously. This publication is a follow-up report of the postnatal clinical outcome of the first prenatally suspected case of combined mosaic trisomy 7 with maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7 (UPD7). CASE: The diagnosis of RSS in the proband was suspected prenatally because trisomy 7 mosaicism (47,XX,+7[13]/46,XX[19]) and maternal uniparental heterodisomy 7 were both found in amniotic fluid cells. Cord blood karyotype analysis showed only disomic cells (46,XX[50]), whereas postpartum chorionic villus analysis was completely trisomic for chromosome 7 (47,XX,+7[19]). Postnatally, the diagnosis of RSS was confirmed by physical findings, her trisomy 7 mosaicism was confirmed by cytogenetic analysis of her skin biopsy (47,XX,+7[9]/46,XX[20]) and her UPD7 was confirmed on both peripheral blood and skin biopsy using microsatellite markers. During infancy, the proband experienced growth deficiency, persistent hypoglycemia, and psychomotor developmental delay. CONCLUSIONS: Trisomic rescue as a life-saving mechanism, with subsequent chromosomal mosaicism in combination with UPD may occur more frequently in RSS than has been reported. Systematic testing of cases suspected prenatally or postnatally would be informative regarding the individual contribution of each factor. Imprinting, loss of heterozygosity for recessive genes, and mosaicism may explain the short stature, asymmetry, and the variable expression of the phenotype. The contribution of these mechanisms to the syndrome should be evaluated in these cases.     

普拉德-威利综合征的分子遗传诊断:一种连锁分析方法的初步建立

普拉德-威利综合征(Prader-Willi Syndrome,PWS)是一种基因组印记相关的疾病,是引起肥胖最常见的遗传综合征。分子和细胞遗传学检查对于该病早期诊断非常重要。通过选择PWS典型缺失区域内、外的STR遗传标记,初步建立了一种适用于中国人群的PWS核心家庭连锁分析方法,并用该方法确定了一例缺失型和一例异源单亲二体型PWS患者,经甲基化特异性PCR和高分辨染色体核型分析验证上述结果正确。同时,该连锁分析方法可以具体区分PWS的分子发病类型,从而为PWS家庭的遗传咨询提供信息,并为进一步研究PWS基因型和表型的关系提供了可能。     

Prader-Willi syndrome with an unusually large 15q deletion due to an unbalanced translocation t(4;15)

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a neurobehavioral disorder caused by deletions in the 15q11-q13 region, by maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 15 or by imprinting defects. Structural rearrangements of chromosome 15 have been described in about 5% of the patients with typical or atypical PWS phenotype. An 8-year-old boy with a clinical diagnosis of PWS, severe neurodevelopmental delay, absence of speech and mental retardation was studied by cytogenetic and molecular techniques, and an unbalanced de novo karyotype 45,XY,der(4)t(4;15)(q35;q14),-15 was detected after GTG-banding. The patient was diagnosed by SNURF-SNRPN exon 1 methylation assay, and the extent of the deletions on chromosomes 4 and 15 was investigated by microsatellite analysis of markers located in 4qter and 15q13-q14 regions. The deletion of chromosome 4q was distal to D4S1652, and that of chromosome 15 was located between D15S1043 and D15S1010. Our patient's severely affected phenotype could be due to the extent of the deletion, larger than usually seen in PWS patients, although the unbalance of the derivative chromosome 4 cannot be ruled out as another possible cause. The breakpoint was located in the subtelomeric region, very close to the telomere, a region that has been described as having the lowest gene concentrations in the human genome.     

Molecular, cytogenetic, and clinical investigations of Prader-Willi syndrome patients.

Thirty-seven patients presenting features of the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) have been examined using cytogenetic and molecular techniques. Clinical evaluation showed that 29 of these patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria for PWS. A deletion of the 15q11.2-q12 region could be identified molecularly in 21 of these cases, including several cases where the cytogenetics results were inconclusive. One clinically typical patient is deleted at only two of five loci normally included in a PWS deletion. A patient carrying a de novo 13;X translocation was not deleted for the molecular markers tested but was clinically considered to be "atypical" PWS. In addition, five cases of maternal heterodisomy and two of isodisomy for 15q11-q13 were observed. All of the eight patients who did not fulfill clinical diagnosis of PWS showed normal maternal and paternal inheritance of chromosome 15 markers; however, one of these carried a ring-15 chromosome. A comparison of clinical features between deletion patients and disomy patients shows no significant differences between the two groups. The parental ages at birth of disomic patients were significantly higher than those for deletion patients. As all typical PWS cases showed either a deletion or disomy of 15q11.2-q12, molecular examination should provide a reliable diagnostic tool. As the disomy patients do not show either any additional or more severe features than typical deletion patients do, it is likely that there is only one imprinted region on chromosome 15 (within 15q11.2-q12).     

Partial maternal heterodisomy of chromosome 17q25 in a case of severe mental retardation

We report a segmental maternal uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 17 (mat UPD17) in a 3-year-old boy presenting with hyperactivity, major instability, mental retardation and facial dysmorphism. Since conventional and high resolution karyotypes were normal, this patient was tested for cryptic telomeric rearrangements by using the recently developed fluorescent genotyping-based technology. The mat UPD17 segment extended for a small 11-cM region of the distal chromosome 17q. Trisomy 17 in circulating lymphocytes and skin fibroblasts was excluded. Our finding emphasizes the potential use of fluorescent genotyping to detect uniparental disomies and suggests that chromosome 17q25 should contain one or several imprinted genes of particular importance for brain development.     

Formation of uniparental disomy 7 delineated from new cases and a UPD7 case after trisomy 7 rescue. Presentation of own results and review of the literature

Maternal uniparental disomy for the entire chromosome 7 (matUPD7) has been reported several times in Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) and growth-restricted patients. Here we present our results from the analysis of an abortion with confined placental mosaicism (CPM) for trisomy 7 which showed a maternal meiotic origin of the trisomy in the placenta and rescue to maternal UPD7 in foetal membrane. Furthermore, two newly detected SRS cases with maternal UPD7 revealed isodisomy and partial heterodisomy, respectively. Summarising these results with those published previously on the origin of UPD7, similar numbers of isodisomy (n=11) and cases with complete or partial heterodisomy (n=12) have been reported. In respect to the different formation mechanisms of UPD, complete isodisomy should be the result of a post-zygotic mitotic segregation error, whereas heterodisomic UPDs should be caused by trisomic rescue after meiotic non-disjunction events. In maternal UPD7, 50% of cases seem to be caused by post-zygotic mitotic segregation errors, which is similar to the situation in trisomy 7. This result corresponds to the situation in trisomy 8 but is in contrast to observations in the frequent aneuploidies. Thus, the different findings in these aberrations reflect the presence of multiple factors that act to ensure normal segregation, varying in importance for each chromosome.     

Angelman syndrome in an inbred family

Angelman syndrome (AS) is characterized by severe mental retardation, absent speech, puppet-like movements, inappropriate laughter, epilepsy, and abnormal electroencephalogram. The majority of AS patients ( 65%) have a maternal deficiency within chromosomal region 15q11–q13, caused by maternal deletion or paternal uniparental disomy (UPD). Approximately 35% of AS patients exhibit neither detectable deletion nor UPD, but a subset of these patients have abnormal methylation at several loci in the 15q11–q13 interval. We describe here three patients with Angelman syndrome belonging to an extended inbred family. High resolution chromosome analysis combined with DNA analysis using 14 marker loci from the 15q11-q13 region failed to detect a deletion in any of the three patients. Paternal UPD of chromosome 15 was detected in one case, while the other two patients have abnormal methylation atD15S9, D15S63, andSNRPN. Although the three patients are distantly related, the chromosome 15q11-q13 haplotypes are different, suggesting that independent mutations gave rise to AS in this family.     

Nondisjunction of chromosome 15: origin and recombination.

Thirty-two cases of uniparental disomy (UPD), ascertained from Prader-Willi syndrome patients (N = 27) and Angelman syndrome patients (N = 5), are used to investigate the pattern of recombination associated with nondisjunction of chromosome 15. In addition, the meiotic stage of nondisjunction is inferred by using markers mapping near the centromere. Two basic approaches to the analysis of recombination are utilized. Standard methods of centromere mapping are employed to determine the level of recombination in specific pairwise intervals along the chromosome. This method shows a significant reduction in recombination for two of five intervals examined. Second, the observed frequency of each recombinant class (i.e., zero, one, two, three, or more observable crossovers) is compared with expected values. This is useful for testing whether the reduction in recombination can be attributed solely to a proportion of cases with no recombination at all (because of asynapsis), with the remaining groups showing normal recombination (or even excess recombination), or whether recombination is uniformly reduced. Analysis of maternal UPD(15) data shows a slight reduction in the multiple-recombinant classes, with a corresponding increase in both the zero- and one-recombinant classes over expected values. The majority, more than 82%, of the extra chromosomes in maternal UPD(15) cases are due to meiotic I nondisjunction events. In contrast, most paternal UPD(15) cases so far examined appear to have a postzygotic origin of the extra paternal chromosome.     

Evaluation of methylation analysis for diagnostic testing in 258 referrals suspected of Prader-Willi or Angelman syndromes

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) are distinct neurodevelopmental disorders with interrelated genetic mechanisms because genomic imprinting within the chromosome 15q11–13 region affects both the PWS and the AS locus. Methylation analysis is one method of distinguishing between the maternally and paternally inherited chromosome 15. Here we present clinical and molecular data on a large series of 258 referred patients, evaluated with methylation analysis: 115 with suspected PWS and 143 with suspected AS. In these patients, the clinical phenotype was graded into three groups: classical (group 1); not classical but possible (group 2); not classical and unlikely (group 3). For PWS, a fourth group consisted of hypotonic babies. DNA methylation analysis confirmed the diagnosis of PWS in 30 patients (26%) and AS in 28 patients (20%). For 21 PWS patients the mechanism was established: 15 had deletions, 4 had uniparental disomy (UPD) and 2 a presumed imprinting defect. Clinically all those with an abnormal methylation pattern had the classical phenotype and none of those with a normal methylation pattern had classical PWS. For 23 AS patients in whom a mechanism was established, 17 had a deletion, 3 had UPD and 3 had a presumed imprinting defect. There was greater clinical overlap in AS, with 26 classical AS patients having a normal methylation pattern while an abnormal methylation pattern was seen in one patient from group 2. In addition, there were a further 40 patients with a normal methylation pattern in whom AS was still a possible diagnosis. Our conclusion is that methylation analysis provides an excellent screening test for both syndromes, providing ∼99% diagnosis for PWS and for AS, a 75% diagnostic rate, supplemented for the remaining 25% with an essential basic starting point to further investigations. Received: 10 February 1998 / Accepted: 7 July 1998     

FISH Variants with D15Z1

We present our experience with cross-hybridization of D15Z1, used in combination with D15S10, D15S11 or SNRPN, in 109 clinical cases referred for Angelman syndrome (AS), Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), for autism to rule out duplication of 15q11.2, or to identify structural chromosome abnormalities thought to involve chromosome 15. Nine cases with normal karyotypes studied with at least one of these probe mixtures showed an extra signal with D15Z1 on a chromosome 14. One case showed absence of the D15Z1 signal from 15p and one case showed an extra signal with D15Z1 on both chromosome 14s. Sixteen cases from this series had structural abnormalities, which included ten cases with supernumerary markers, three of which had a D15Z1 signal on a chromosome 14. The remaining cases did not have an extra signal on chromosome 14, but included rearrangements between Y and 15, 15 and 19, and a r(15), all with breakpoints in 15p11.1 or p11.2. Of the three cases with a supernumerary marker and an extra D15Z1 signal on a chromosome 14, one was a maternally derived marker, while the variant 14 was paternal in origin. The other two markers were de novo. The high frequency of variant 14 in cases with supernumerary markers (30%) was not significant by Chi-square analysis compared to the overall frequency in 109 cases of 11.9%. The overall frequency is consistent with a previous report by Stergianou et al. (1993). We can now add that a false-negative result may occur slightly less than 1% of the time. The chance that both chromosome 14 homologs will be positive for D15Z1 is theoretically about 1 in 300. If associated with an abnormal phenotype, the possibility of uniparental disomy should be ruled out.     

Origin of uniparental disomy 6: presentation of a new case and review on the literature

Paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 6 has been reported several times in patients with (transient) neonatal diabetes mellitus ((T)NDM). Here we present our short tandem repeat typing results in a new patient with NDM, revealing a paternal isodisomy (UPiD). Summarising these data with those published previously on complete paternal (n=13) and maternal (n=2) UPD6, all cases show isodisomy. In general, several modes of UPD formation have been suggested: While a meiotic origin of UPD mainly results in a uniparental heterodisomy (UPhD), UPiD is probably the result of a post-zygotic mitotic error. This mode of formation consists of a mitotic nondisjunction in a disomic zygote, followed by either a trisomic rescue or a reduplication. Endoduplication in a monosomic zygote is another possible but less probable mechanism, taking into consideration that monosomic zygotes are not viable. The exclusive finding of isodisomy in case of chromosome 6 therefore gives strong evidence that segregational errors of this chromosome are mainly influenced by postzygotic factors. This hypothesis is supported by the observation of two cases with partial paternal UPiD6 originating from mitotic recombination events. The influence of mitotic segregational errors in UPD6 formation is in agreement with the results in trisomy/UPD of other chromosomes of the C group (7 and 8), and is in remarkable contrast to the findings in studies on the origin of the frequent aneuploidies. Multiple factors ensure normal segregation and we speculate that they vary in importance for each chromosome.