Structure of human rhinovirus complexed with Fab fragments from a neutralizing antibody.

We have determined the structure of a human rhinovirus (HRV)-Fab complex by using cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction techniques. This is the first view of an intact human virus complexed with a monoclonal Fab (Fab17-IA) for which both atomic structures are known. The surface area on HRV type 14 (HRV14) in contact with Fab17-IA was approximately 500 A2 (5 nm2), which is much larger than the area that constitutes the NIm-IA epitope (on viral protein VP1) defined by natural escape mutants. From modeling studies and electrostatic potential calculations, charged residues outside the neutralizing immunogenic site IA (NIm-IA) were also predicted to be involved in antibody recognition. These predictions were confirmed by site-specific mutations and analysis of the Fab17-IA-HRV14 complex, along with knowledge of the crystallographic structures of HRV14 and Fab17-IA. The bound Fab17-IA reaches across a surface depression (the canyon) and meets a related Fab at the nearest icosahedral twofold axis. By adjusting the elbow angles of the bound Fab fragments from 162 degrees to 198 degrees, an intact antibody molecule can be easily modeled. This, along with aggregation and binding stoichiometry results, supports the earlier proposal that this antibody binds bivalently to the surface of HRV14 across icosahedral twofold axes. One prediction of this model, that the intact canyon-spanning immunoglobulin G molecule would block attachment of the virus to HeLa cells, was confirmed experimentally.     

Antibody-Mediated Neutralization of Human Rhinovirus 14 Explored by Means of Cryoelectron Microscopy and X-Ray Crystallography of Virus-Fab Complexes

The structures of three different human rhinovirus 14 (HRV14)-Fab complexes have been explored with X-ray crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy procedures. All three antibodies bind to the NIm-IA site of HRV14, which is the β-B–β-C loop of the viral capsid protein VP1. Two antibodies, Fab17-IA (Fab17) and Fab12-IA (Fab12), bind bivalently to the virion surface and strongly neutralize viral infectivity whereas Fab1-IA (Fab1) strongly aggregates and weakly neutralizes virions. The structures of the two classes of virion-Fab complexes clearly differ and correlate with observed binding neutralization differences. Fab17 and Fab12 bind in essentially identical, tangential orientations to the viral surface, which favors bidentate binding over icosahedral twofold axes. Fab1 binds in a more radial orientation that makes bidentate binding unlikely. Although the binding orientations of these two antibody groups differ, nearly identical charge interactions occur at all paratope-epitope interfaces. Nucleotide sequence comparisons suggest that Fab17 and Fab12 are from the same progenitor cell and that some of the differing residues contact the south wall of the receptor binding canyon that encircles each of the icosahedral fivefold vertices. All of the antibodies contact a significant proportion of the canyon region and directly overlap much of the receptor (intercellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM-1]) binding site. Fab1, however, does not contact the same residues on the upper south wall (the side facing away from fivefold axes) at the receptor binding region as do Fab12 and Fab17. All three antibodies cause some stabilization of HRV14 against pH-induced inactivation; thus, stabilization may be mediated by invariant contacts with the canyon.Picornaviruses are among the largest of animal virus families and include the well-known poliovirus, rhinovirus, foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), coxsackievirus, and hepatitis A virus. The rhinoviruses, of which there are more than 100 serotypes subdivided into two groups, are major causative agents of the common cold in humans (42). The viruses are nonenveloped and have an ∼300-Å-diameter protein shell that encapsidates a single-stranded, plus-sense RNA genome of about 7,200 bases. The human rhinovirus 14 (HRV14) capsid exhibits a pseudo-T=3 (P=3) icosahedral symmetry and consists of 60 copies each of four viral proteins, VP1, VP2, VP3, and VP4, with VP4 at the RNA-capsid interface (40). An ∼20-Å deep canyon lies roughly at the junction of VP1 (forming the north rim) with VP2 and VP3 (forming the south rim) and surrounds each of the 12 icosahedral fivefold vertices. The canyon regions of HRV14 and HRV16, both major receptor group rhinoviruses, were shown to contain the binding site of the cellular receptor, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) (8, 24a, 37). Four major neutralizing immunogenic (NIm) sites, NIm-IA, NIm-IB, NIm-II, and NIm-III, were identified by studies of neutralization escape mutants with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (46, 47) and then mapped to four protruding regions on the viral surface (40).Several mechanisms of antibody-mediated neutralization have been proposed. Perhaps the simplest is based on aggregation of virions (5, 53, 54), which generally occurs over a narrow range of antibody/virus ratios. This limited range has raised questions about the role of aggregation in vivo. Alternative suggestions are that antibodies may neutralize virions by inducing extensive conformational changes in the capsid (15, 29), abrogate virus attachment to the host cell (8, 14), or prevent uncoating (57). There is no universal acceptance of a single neutralization mechanism, and the various MAbs may neutralize with different combinations of these mechanisms.Neutralizing MAbs against HRV14 have been divided into three groups: strong, intermediate, and weak neutralizers (26, 34). All strongly neutralizing antibodies bind to the NIm-IA site, which was defined by natural escape mutations at residues D1091 and E1095 of VP1 on the loop between the β-B and β-C strands of the VP1 β-barrel (the letter designates the amino acid, the first digit identifies the viral protein, and the remaining three digits specify the sequence number). Because strongly neutralizing antibodies form stable, monomeric virus-antibody complexes with a maximum stoichiometry of 30 antibodies per virion, it was concluded that they bind bivalently to the virions (26, 34). Weakly neutralizing antibodies form unstable, monomeric complexes with HRV14 and bind with a stoichiometry of ∼60 antibodies per virion (26, 52). The remaining antibodies, all of which precipitate the virions, are classified as intermediate neutralizers (26, 34).The structures of two complexes, the strongly neutralizing antibody MAb17-IA and its Fab fragment, Fab17, bound to HRV14, were determined by means of cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and three-dimensional image reconstruction (51, 52) and interpreted on the basis of model-building studies that used the atomic structures of HRV14 (40) and Fab17 (28). These studies showed that no observable conformational changes were induced in the viral capsid upon Fab or MAb binding. Modeling and site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated that electrostatic interactions play a key role in the binding of Fab17 to HRV14 (52). In the complex, the loop of the NIm-IA site on HRV14 sits clamped in the cleft between the heavy- and light-chain hypervariable regions and forms complementary electrostatic interactions with Lys58^H (on the heavy chain) and Arg91^L (on the light chain) of Fab17. In addition, a cluster of lysines on HRV14 (K1236, K1097, and K1085) interact with two acidic residues, Asp45^H and Asp54^H, in the CDR2 (CDR stands for complementarity-determining region) of the Fab heavy chain (49). Earlier modeling studies also suggested that bidentate binding of MAb17-IA to HRV14 is facilitated by rotation of the Fab constant domains about the elbow axes towards the viral twofold axes (51). This suggested that the flexibility of the elbow region (the junction between the variable and constant domains) plays a role in the bivalent binding process, which in turn increases antibody avidity. Finally, the 4-Å-resolution crystal structure of the Fab17-HRV14 complex clearly showed that the virion does not undergo conformational changes upon Fab binding (49). This crystal structure determination also revealed that the earlier docking of the HRV14 and Fab17 atomic structures into the 22-Å cryo-TEM density map (50) yielded a pseudo-atomic model that was very close to the real structure of the complex.We have expanded our complementary X-ray crystallography and cryo-TEM microscopy studies to examine the structures of two more Fab-virus complexes, using Fab fragments from two other NIm-IA antibodies, MAb1-IA (MAb1) and MAb12-IA (MAb12), bound to HRV14. MAb1 and MAb12 are weak and strong neutralizing antibodies, respectively. Image reconstructions of these two complexes are interpreted on the basis of pseudo-atomic models, which substantiate the previous hypothesis that neutralizing efficacy and binding valency are interrelated (34). Electrostatic interactions at the epitope-paratope interface are highly conserved and apparently important for the antibody binding to the virion surface. Like Fab17, Fab1 and Fab12 penetrate the canyon. There are, however, differences between the orientations of the strongly and weakly neutralizing antibodies and in the contacts made with the receptor binding region of the canyon. Finally, data suggesting that antibody binding to HRV14 is alone sufficient for neutralization and that other possible mechanisms are not required are presented.     

Structure of a Neutralizing Antibody Bound Monovalently to Human Rhinovirus 2

The structure of a complex between human rhinovirus 2 (HRV2) and the Fab fragment of neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3B10 has been determined to 25-Å resolution by cryoelectron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques. The footprint of 3B10 on HRV2 is very similar to that of neutralizing MAb 8F5, which binds bivalently across the icosahedral twofold axis. However, the 3B10 Fab fragment (Fab-3B10) is bound in an orientation, inclined at approximately 45° to the surface of the virus capsid, which is compatible only with monovalent binding of the antibody. The canyon around the fivefold axis is not directly obstructed by the bound Fab. The X-ray structures of a closely related HRV (HRV1A) and a Fab fragment were fitted to the density maps of the HRV2–Fab-3B10 complex obtained by cryoelectron microscope techniques. The footprint of 3B10 on the viral surface is largely on VP2 but also covers the VP3 loop centered on residue 3064 and the VP1 loop centered on residue 1267. MAb 3B10 can interact directly with VP2 residue 2164, the site of an escape mutation on VP2, and with VP1 residues 1264 to 1267, the site of a deletion escape mutation. Deletion of these residues shortens the VP1 loop, moving it away from the MAb binding site. All structural and biochemical evidence indicates that MAb 3B10 binds to a conformation epitope on HRV2.     

Structure of a neutralizing antibody bound bivalently to human rhinovirus 2.

The structure of a complex between human rhinovirus serotype 2 (HRV2) and the weakly neutralizing monoclonal antibody 8F5 has been determined to 25 A resolution by cryo-electron microscopy and 3-D reconstruction techniques. THe antibody is seen to be bound bivalently across the icosahedral 2-fold axis, despite the very short distance of 60 A between the symmetry-related epitopes. The canyon around the 5-fold axis is not obstructed. Due to extreme flexibility of the hinge region the Fc domains occupy random orientations and are not visible in the reconstruction. The atomic coordinates of Fab-8F5 complexes with a synthetic peptide derived from the viral protein 2 (VP2) epitope were fitted to the structure obtained by cryo-electron microscope techniques. The X-ray structure of HRV2 is not unknown, so that of the closely related HRV1A was placed in the electron microscopic density map. The footprint of 8F5 on the viral surface is largely on VP2, but also covers the VP3 loop centred on residue 3060. C alpha atoms of VP1 and 8F5 come no closer than 10 A. Based on the fit of the X-ray coordinates to the electron microscope data, the synthetic 15mer peptide starts and ends in close proximity to the corresponding amino acids of VP2 on HRV1A. However, the respective loops diverge considerably in their overall spatial disposition. It appears from this study that bivalent binding of an antibody directed against a picornavirus exists for a smaller spanning distance than was previously thought possible. Also bivalent binding does not ensure strong neutralization.     

Docking of a human rhinovirus neutralizing antibody onto the viral capsid

The structure of the complex between the Fab fragment of a human rhinovirus serotype 2 (HRV2) neutralizing antibody (8F5) and a cross-reactive synthetic peptide derived from the viral capsid protein VP2 has been recently determined by crystallographic methods.¹ The conformation adopted by the peptide was very similar to and could be superimposed onto the corresponding region of the viral protein VP2 of human rhinovirus 1A (HRV1A) whose three-dimensional structure is known.² The structure of the Fab fragment determined in the complex was docked onto the viral capsid using the superimposition transformation found for the peptide. In the resulting model the Fab protrudes almost radially to about 60 Å from the surface of the virion without any major steric problem. The Fab fragment was then placed on each one of the 60 equivalent epitopes using the T = 1 icosahedral symmetry of the virus. The closest pairs of Fab fragments are related by viral 2-fold axes and run almost parallel to each other without clashing. These axes of symmetry from the viral particle could thus be coincident with the dyad axes of the antibodies. Furthermore, comparison of the three-dimensional structure of the Fab/peptide complex with the structure of the Fab fragment alone³ indicates that the flexibility of the antibody's elbow would facilitate bivalent attachment to the same viral particle. In accordance with the docking results, experimental determination of the stoichiometry of binding yielded a ratio of 30 IgG molecules per virion also suggesting bivalent attachment of antibody 8F5 onto the viral particle. The neutralization of viral infectivity, being neither aggregation (this paper) nor inhibition of receptor binding,⁴ might be mainly achieved by reducing viral spread from cell to cell and/or inhibition of uncoating. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Minute virus of mice, a parvovirus, in complex with the Fab fragment of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody

The structure of virus-like particles of the lymphotropic, immunosuppressive strain of minute virus of mice (MVMi) in complex with the neutralizing Fab fragment of the mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) B7 was determined by cryo-electron microscopy to 7-A resolution. The Fab molecule recognizes a conformational epitope at the vertex of a three-fold protrusion on the viral surface, thereby simultaneously engaging three symmetry-related viral proteins in binding. The location of the epitope close to the three-fold axis is consistent with the previous analysis of MVMi mutants able to escape from the B7 antibody. The binding site close to the symmetry axes sterically forbids the binding of more than one Fab molecule per spike. MAb as well as the Fab molecules inhibits the binding of the minute virus of mice (MVM) to permissive cells but can also neutralize MVM postattachment. This finding suggests that the interaction of B7 with three symmetry-related viral subunits at each spike hinders structural transitions in the viral capsid essential during viral entry.     

Structural Basis for Recognition of Human Enterovirus 71 by a Bivalent Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is the main pathogen responsible for hand, foot and mouth disease with severe neurological complications and even death in young children. We have recently identified a highly potent anti-EV71 neutralizing monoclonal antibody, termed D5. Here we investigated the structural basis for recognition of EV71 by the antibody D5. Four three-dimensional structures of EV71 particles in complex with IgG or Fab of D5 were reconstructed by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) single particle analysis all at subnanometer resolutions. The most critical EV71 mature virion-Fab structure was resolved to a resolution of 4.8 Å, which is rare in cryo-EM studies of virus-antibody complex so far. The structures reveal a bivalent binding pattern of D5 antibody across the icosahedral 2-fold axis on mature virion, suggesting that D5 binding may rigidify virions to prevent their conformational changes required for subsequent RNA release. Moreover, we also identified that the complementary determining region 3 (CDR3) of D5 heavy chain directly interacts with the extremely conserved VP1 GH-loop of EV71, which was validated by biochemical and virological assays. We further showed that D5 is indeed able to neutralize a variety of EV71 genotypes and strains. Moreover, D5 could potently confer protection in a mouse model of EV71 infection. Since the conserved VP1 GH-loop is involved in EV71 binding with its uncoating receptor, the scavenger receptor class B, member 2 (SCARB2), the broadly neutralizing ability of D5 might attribute to its inhibition of EV71 from binding SCARB2. Altogether, our results elucidate the structural basis for the binding and neutralization of EV71 by the broadly neutralizing antibody D5, thereby enhancing our understanding of antibody-based protection against EV71 infection.     

Three-dimensional structure of the Fab fragment of a neutralizing antibody to human rhinovirus serotype 2.

The crystal structure of the antigen-binding fragment of a monoclonal antibody (8F5) that neutralizes human rhinovirus serotype 2 has been determined by X-ray diffraction studies. Antibody 8F5, obtained by immunization with native HRV2 virions, cross-reacts with peptides of the viral capsid protein VP2, which contribute to the neutralizing immunogenic site B in this serotype. The structure was solved by the molecular replacement method and has been refined to an R-factor of 18.9% at 2.8 A resolution. The elbow angle, relating the variable and constant modules of the molecule is 127 degrees, representing the smallest elbow angle observed so far in an Fab fragment. Furthermore, the charged residues of the epitope can be well accommodated in the antigen-binding site. This is the first crystal structure reported for an antibody directed against an icosahedral virus.     

Capsid Antibodies to Different Adeno-Associated Virus Serotypes Bind Common Regions

Interactions between viruses and the host antibody immune response are critical in the development and control of disease, and antibodies are also known to interfere with the efficacy of viral vector-based gene delivery. The adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) being developed as vectors for corrective human gene delivery have shown promise in clinical trials, but preexisting antibodies are detrimental to successful outcomes. However, the antigenic epitopes on AAV capsids remain poorly characterized. Cryo-electron microscopy and three-dimensional image reconstruction were used to define the locations of epitopes to which monoclonal fragment antibodies (Fabs) against AAV1, AAV2, AAV5, and AAV6 bind. Pseudoatomic modeling showed that, in each serotype, Fabs bound to a limited number of sites near the protrusions surrounding the 3-fold axes of the T=1 icosahedral capsids. For the closely related AAV1 and AAV6, a common Fab exhibited substoichiometric binding, with one Fab bound, on average, between two of the three protrusions as a consequence of steric crowding. The other AAV Fabs saturated the capsid and bound to the walls of all 60 protrusions, with the footprint for the AAV5 antibody extending toward the 5-fold axis. The angle of incidence for each bound Fab on the AAVs varied and resulted in significant differences in how much of each viral capsid surface was occluded beyond the Fab footprints. The AAV-antibody interactions showed a common set of footprints that overlapped some known receptor-binding sites and transduction determinants, thus suggesting potential mechanisms for virus neutralization by the antibodies.     

Equilibrium and kinetic parameters for the interaction of a monoclonal antibody with liposomes bearing fluorescent haptens

We have obtained equilibrium and rate constants for the interaction of monoclonal IgG and its monovalent Fab fragment with a hapten (fluorescein) attached to the surface of a liposome. Binding was detected at nanomolar hapten concentrations by the quenching of the hapten's fluorescence on antibody binding. The binding parameters were computed from nonlinear least squares fits, using mass-action models. Crypticity of the hapten was observed and interpreted as an equilibrium between two states, extended and sequestered, the latter representing haptens associated with the membrane surface. Depending on the lipid composition of the liposomes, the fraction of sequestered hapten ranged from 0.25 to 0.975; transitions between the two states took place on the time scale of minutes. Fab interactions with extended hapten on the membrane were similar to interactions with water-soluble hapten. The ability of IgG to bind bivalently to membrane gave it an avidity two to six times the affinity for purely monovalent binding. However, the equilibrium constant for the monovalent-bivalent binding equilibrium was effectively four to five orders of magnitude less than that for the initial binding step. This probably reflects steric penalties for the simultaneous binding of two haptens on a membrane.     

Discrimination among rhinovirus serotypes for a variant ICAM-1 receptor molecule

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) is the cellular receptor for the major group of human rhinovirus serotypes, including human rhinovirus 14 (HRV14) and HRV16. A naturally occurring variant of ICAM-1, ICAM-1Kilifi, has altered binding characteristics with respect to different HRV serotypes. HRV14 binds to ICAM-1 only transiently at physiological temperatures but forms a stable complex with ICAM-1Kilifi. Conversely, HRV16 forms a stable complex with ICAM-1 but does not bind to ICAM-1Kilifi. The three-dimensional structures of HRV14 and HRV16, complexed with ICAM-1, and the structure of HRV14, complexed with ICAM-1Kilifi, have been determined by cryoelectron microscopy (cryoEM) image reconstruction to a resolution of approximately 10 angstroms. Structures determined by X-ray crystallography of both viruses and of ICAM-1 were fitted into the cryoEM density maps. The interfaces between the viruses and receptors contain extensive ionic networks. However, the interactions between the viruses and ICAM-1Kilifi contain one less salt bridge than between the viruses and ICAM-1. As HRV16 has fewer overall interactions with ICAM-1 than HRV14, the absence of this charge interaction has a greater impact on the binding of ICAM-1Kilifi to HRV16 than to HRV14.     

An antibody to the putative aphid recognition site on cucumber mosaic virus recognizes pentons but not hexons

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), the type member of the genus Cucumovirus (family Bromoviridae), is transmitted by aphids in a nonpersistent manner. Mutagenesis experiments identified the betaH-betaI loop of the capsid subunit as a potential key motif responsible for interactions with the insect vector. To further examine the functional characteristics of this motif, we generated monoclonal antibodies that bound to native virions but not to betaH-betaI mutants. Fab fragments from these antibodies were complexed with wild-type CMV and the virus-Fab structure was determined to 12-A resolution by using electron cryomicroscopy and image reconstruction techniques. The electron density attributed to the bound antibody has a turret-like appearance and protrudes from each of the 12 fivefold axes of the icosahedral virus. Thus, the antibody binds only to the pentameric clusters (pentons) of A subunits of the T=3 quasisymmetric virus and does not appear to bind to any of the B and C subunits that occur as hexameric clusters (hexons) at the threefold (quasi-sixfold) axes. Modeling and electron density comparisons were used to analyze the paratope-epitope interface and demonstrated that the antibody binds to three betaH-betaI loops in three adjacent A subunits in each penton. This antibody can discriminate between A and B/C subunits even though the betaH-betaI loop adopts the same structure in all 180 capsid subunits and is therefore recognizing differences in subunit arrangements. Antibodies with such character have potential use as probes of viral assembly. Our results may provide an additional rationale for designing synthetic vaccines by using symmetrical viral particles.     

Crystal structure of the potato leafroll virus coat protein and implications for viral assembly

Luteoviruses, poleroviruses, and enamoviruses are insect-transmitted, agricultural pathogens that infect a wide array of plants, including staple food crops. Previous cryo-electron microscopy studies of virus-like particles show that luteovirid viral capsids are built from a structural coat protein that organizes with T = 3 icosahedral symmetry. Here, we present the crystal structure of a truncated version of the coat protein monomer from potato leafroll virus at 1.80-Å resolution. In the crystal lattice, monomers pack into flat sheets that preserve the two-fold and three-fold axes of icosahedral symmetry and show minimal structural deviations when compared to the full-length subunits of the assembled virus-like particle. These observations have important implications in viral assembly and maturation and suggest that the CP N-terminus and its interactions with RNA play an important role in generating capsid curvature.     

An externalized polypeptide partitions between two distinct sites on genome-released poliovirus particles

During cell entry, native poliovirus (160S) converts to a cell-entry intermediate (135S) particle, resulting in the externalization of capsid proteins VP4 and the amino terminus of VP1 (residues 1 to 53). Externalization of these entities is followed by release of the RNA genome (uncoating), leaving an empty (80S) particle. The antigen-binding fragment (Fab) of a monospecific peptide 1 (P1) antibody, which was raised against a peptide corresponding to amino-terminal residues 24 to 40 of VP1, was utilized to track the location of the amino terminus of VP1 in the 135S and 80S states of poliovirus particles via cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and three-dimensional image reconstruction. On 135S, P1 Fabs bind to a prominent feature on the external surface known as the “propeller tip.” In contrast, our initial 80S-P1 reconstruction showed P1 Fabs also binding to a second site, at least 50 Å distant, at the icosahedral 2-fold axes. Further analysis showed that the overall population of 80S-P1 particles consisted of three kinds of capsids: those with P1 Fabs bound only at the propeller tips, P1 Fabs bound only at the 2-fold axes, or P1 Fabs simultaneously bound at both positions. Our results indicate that, in 80S particles, a significant fraction of VP1 can deviate from icosahedral symmetry. Hence, this portion of VP1 does not change conformation synchronously when switching from the 135S state. These conclusions are compatible with previous observations of multiple conformations of the 80S state and suggest that movement of the amino terminus of VP1 has a role in uncoating. Similar deviations from icosahedral symmetry may be biologically significant during other viral transitions.     

Complexes of Neutralizing and Non-Neutralizing Affinity Matured Fabs with a Mimetic of the Internal Trimeric Coiled-Coil of HIV-1 gp41

A series of mini-antibodies (monovalent and bivalent Fabs) targeting the conserved internal trimeric coiled-coil of the N-heptad repeat (N-HR) of HIV-1 gp41 has been previously constructed and reported. Crystal structures of two closely related monovalent Fabs, one (Fab 8066) broadly neutralizing across a wide panel of HIV-1 subtype B and C viruses, and the other (Fab 8062) non-neutralizing, representing the extremes of this series, were previously solved as complexes with 5-Helix, a gp41 pre-hairpin intermediate mimetic. Binding of these Fabs to covalently stabilized chimeric trimers of N-peptides of HIV-1 gp41 (named (CCIZN36)₃ or 3-H) has now been investigated using X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, and a variety of biophysical methods. Crystal structures of the complexes between 3-H and Fab 8066 and Fab 8062 were determined at 2.8 and 3.0 Å resolution, respectively. Although the structures of the complexes with the neutralizing Fab 8066 and its non-neutralizing counterpart Fab 8062 were generally similar, small differences between them could be correlated with the biological properties of these antibodies. The conformations of the corresponding CDRs of each antibody in the complexes with 3-H and 5-Helix are very similar. The adaptation to a different target upon complex formation is predominantly achieved by changes in the structure of the trimer of N-HR helices, as well as by adjustment of the orientation of the Fab molecule relative to the N-HR in the complex, via rigid-body movement. The structural data presented here indicate that binding of three Fabs 8062 with high affinity requires more significant changes in the structure of the N-HR trimer compared to binding of Fab 8066. A comparative analysis of the structures of Fabs complexed to different gp41 intermediate mimetics allows further evaluation of biological relevance for generation of neutralizing antibodies, as well as provides novel structural insights into immunogen design.     

Structural insights into chemokine CCL17 recognition by antibody M116

The homeostatic chemokine CCL17, also known as thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC), has been associated with various diseases such as asthma, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, atopic dermatitis and ulcerative colitis. Neutralization of CCL17 by antibody treatment ameliorates the impact of disease by blocking influx of T cells. Monoclonal antibody M116 derived from a combinatorial library shows potency in neutralizing CCL17-induced signaling. To gain insight into the structural determinants of antigen recognition, the crystal structure of M116 Fab was determined in complex with CCL17 and in the unbound form. Comparison of the structures revealed an unusual induced-fit mechanism of antigen recognition that involves cis-trans isomerization in two CDRs. The structure of the CCL17-M116 complex revealed the antibody binding epitope, which does not overlap with the putative receptor epitope, suggesting that the current model of chemokine-receptor interactions, as observed in the CXCR4-vMIP-II system, may not be universal.     

Acid-induced movements in the glycoprotein shell of an alphavirus turn the spikes into membrane fusion mode

In the icosahedral (T = 4) Semliki Forest virus, the envelope protomers, i.e. E1-E2 heterodimers, make one-to-one interactions with capsid proteins below the viral lipid bilayer, transverse the membrane and form an external glycoprotein shell with projections. The shell is organized by protomer domains interacting as hexamers and pentamers around shell openings at icosahedral 2- and 5-fold axes, respectively, and the projections by other domains associating as trimers at 3- and quasi 3-fold axes. We show here, using cryo- electron microscopy, that low pH, as occurs in the endosomes during virus uptake, results in the relaxation of protomer interactions around the 2- and the 5-fold axes in the shell, and movement of protomers towards 3- and quasi 3-fold axes in a way that reciprocally relocates their putative E1 and E2 domains. This seemed to be facilitated by a trimerization of transmembrane segments at the same axes. The alterations observed help to explain several key features of the spike-mediated membrane fusion reaction, including shell dissolution, heterodimer dissociation, fusion peptide exposure and E1 homotrimerization.     

A functional epitope determinant on domain III of the Japanese encephalitis virus envelope protein interacted with neutralizing-antibody combining sites

The envelope (E) protein of Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is associated with viral binding to cellular receptors, membrane fusion, and the induction of protective neutralizing-antibody responses in hosts. Most previous studies have not provided detailed molecular information about the spatial configuration of the functional epitopes on domain III of the E protein. Here site-directed mutagenesis was performed to demonstrate that the functional epitope determinants at Ser331 and Asp332 on domain III of the JEV E protein interacted with neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb) E3.3. Bacterial expression of the recombinant Fab E3.3 confirmed the molecular interactions of Arg94 in complementary determining region H3 with Ser331 and Asp332 on domain III. This study elucidates the detailed molecular structures of the neutralizing epitope determinants on JEV domain III, which can provide useful information for designing new vaccines.     

Structural basis for the preferential recognition of immature flaviviruses by a fusion‐loop antibody

Flaviviruses are a group of human pathogens causing severe encephalitic or hemorrhagic diseases that include West Nile, dengue and yellow fever viruses. Here, using X‐ray crystallography we have defined the structure of the flavivirus cross‐reactive antibody E53 that engages the highly conserved fusion loop of the West Nile virus envelope glycoprotein. Using cryo‐electron microscopy, we also determined that E53 Fab binds preferentially to spikes in noninfectious, immature flavivirions but is unable to bind significantly to mature virions, consistent with the limited solvent exposure of the epitope. We conclude that the neutralizing impact of E53 and likely similar fusion‐loop‐specific antibodies depends on its binding to the frequently observed immature component of flavivirus particles. Our results elucidate how fusion‐loop antibodies, which comprise a significant fraction of the humoral response against flaviviruses, can function to control infection without appreciably recognizing mature virions. As these highly cross‐reactive antibodies are often weakly neutralizing they also may contribute to antibody‐dependent enhancement and flavi virus pathogenesis thereby complicating development of safe and effective vaccines.     

Local and global anatomy of antibody‐protein antigen recognition

Deciphering antibody‐protein antigen recognition is of fundamental and practical significance. We constructed an antibody structural dataset, partitioned it into human and murine subgroups, and compared it with nonantibody protein‐protein complexes. We investigated the physicochemical properties of regions on and away from the antibody‐antigen interfaces, including net charge, overall antibody charge distributions, and their potential role in antigen interaction. We observed that amino acid preference in antibody‐protein antigen recognition is entropy driven, with residues having low side‐chain entropy appearing to compensate for the high backbone entropy in interaction with protein antigens. Antibodies prefer charged and polar antigen residues and bridging water molecules. They also prefer positive net charge, presumably to promote interaction with negatively charged protein antigens, which are common in proteomes. Antibody‐antigen interfaces have large percentages of Tyr, Ser, and Asp, but little Lys. Electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions in the Ag binding sites might be coupled with Fab domains through organized charge and residue distributions away from the binding interfaces. Here we describe some features of antibody‐antigen interfaces and of Fab domains as compared with nonantibody protein‐protein interactions. The distributions of interface residues in human and murine antibodies do not differ significantly. Overall, our results provide not only a local but also a global anatomy of antibody structures.