Molecular determinants involved in the allosteric control of agonist affinity in the GABAB receptor by the GABAB2 subunit

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor is an allosteric complex made of two subunits, GABAB1 (GB1) and GABAB2 (GB2). Both subunits are composed of an extracellular Venus flytrap domain (VFT) and a heptahelical domain (HD). GB1 binds GABA, and GB2 plays a major role in G-protein activation as well as in the high agonist affinity state of GB1. How agonist affinity in GB1 is regulated in the receptor remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that GB2 VFT is a major molecular determinant involved in this control. We show that isolated versions of GB1 and GB2 VFTs in the absence of the HD and C-terminal tail can form hetero-oligomers as shown by time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (based on HTRF technology). GB2 VFT and its association with GB1 VFT controlled agonist affinity in GB1 in two ways. First, GB2 VFT exerted a direct action on GB1 VFT, as it slightly increased agonist affinity in isolated GB1 VFT. Second and most importantly, GB2 VFT prevented inhibitory interaction between the two main domains (VFT and HD) of GB1. According to this model, we propose that GB1 HD prevents the possible natural closure of GB1 VFT. In contrast, GB2 VFT facilitates this closure. Finally, such inhibitory contacts between HD and VFT in GB1 could be similar to those important to maintain the inactive state of the receptor.     

Trans-activation between 7TM domains: implication in heterodimeric GABAB receptor activation

Seven-transmembrane domain (7TM) receptors have important functions in cell-cell communication and can assemble into dimers or oligomers. Such complexes may allow specific functional cross-talk through trans-activation of interacting 7TMs, but this hypothesis requires further validation. Herein, we used the GABAB receptor, which is composed of two distinct subunits, GABAB1, which binds the agonist, and GABAB2, which activates G proteins, as a model system. By using a novel orthogonal-labelling approach compatible with time-resolved FRET and based on ACP- and SNAP-tag technologies to verify the heterodimerization of wild-type and mutated GABAB subunits, we demonstrate the existence of a direct allosteric coupling between the 7TMs of GABAB heterodimers. Indeed, a GABAB receptor, in which the GABAB2 extracellular domain was deleted, was still capable of activating G proteins. Furthermore, synthetic ligands for the GABAB2 7TM could increase agonist affinity at the GABAB1 subunit in this mutated receptor. In addition to bringing new information on GABAB receptor activation, these data clearly demonstrate the existence of direct trans-activation between the 7TM of two interacting proteins.     

Lateral diffusion of the GABAB receptor is regulated by the GABAB2 C terminus

GABAB (gamma-aminobutyric acid, type B) is a heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptor. The GABAB1 subunit, which contains an endoplasmic reticulum retention sequence, is only transported to the cell surface when it is associated with the GABAB2 subunit. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching studies in transfected COS-7 cells and hippocampal neurons revealed that GABAB2 diffuses slowly within the plasma membrane whether expressed alone or with the GABAB1 subunit. Treatment of cells with brefeldin A revealed that GABAB2 moves freely within the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting that slow movement of GABAB2 is a result of its plasma membrane insertion. Disruption of the cytoskeleton did not affect the mobility of GABAB2, indicating that its restricted diffusion is not due to direct interactions with actin or tubulin. To determine whether the C terminus of GABAB2 regulates its diffusion, this region of the subunit was attached to the lymphocyte membrane protein, CD2, which then exhibited a slower rate of lateral diffusion. Furthermore, co-expression of a cytoplasmically expressed soluble form of the GABAB2 C terminus increased movement of the GABAB2 subunit. We constructed forms of GABAB2 with various C-terminal truncations. Truncation of GABAB2 after residue 862, but not residue 886, caused a dramatic increase in its mobility, suggesting that the region between these two residues is critical for restricting GABAB2 diffusion. Finally, we investigated whether activation of GABAB might modulate its movement. Treatment of COS-7 cells with the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen significantly increased its mobile fraction. These data show that the restricted movement of GABAB at the cell surface is regulated by a region within its C terminus.     

Coordinated action of NSF and PKC regulates GABAB receptor signaling efficacy

The obligatory heterodimerization of the GABAB receptor (GBR) raises fundamental questions about molecular mechanisms controlling its signaling efficacy. Here, we show that NEM sensitive fusion (NSF) protein interacts directly with the GBR heterodimer both in rat brain synaptosomes and in CHO cells, forming a ternary complex that can be regulated by agonist stimulation. Inhibition of NSF binding with a peptide derived from GBR2 (TAT-Pep-27) did not affect basal signaling activity but almost completely abolished agonist-promoted GBR desensitization in both CHO cells and hippocampal slices. Taken with the role of PKC in the desensitization process, our observation that TAT-Pep-27 prevented both agonist-promoted recruitment of PKC and receptor phosphorylation suggests that NSF is a priming factor required for GBR desensitization. Given that GBR desensitization does not involve receptor internalization, the NSF/PKC coordinated action revealed herein suggests that NSF can regulate GPCR signalling efficacy independently of its role in membrane trafficking. The functional interaction between three bona fide regulators of neurotransmitter release, such as GBR, NSF and PKC, could shed new light on the modulation of presynaptic GBR action.     

Prevention of the agonist binding to gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptors by guanine nucleotides and islet-activating protein, pertussis toxin, in bovine cerebral cortex. Possible coupling of the toxin-sensitive GTP-binding proteins to receptors

Using the membranes treated with Triton X-100, we studied the interaction between gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptors and the GTP-binding proteins which are the substrates for ADP-ribosylation by the islet-activating protein (IAP), pertussis toxin. The addition of guanine nucleotides to the membranes markedly decreased the binding of GABA to GABAB receptors. Preincubation of the membranes with IAP plus NAD caused ADP-ribosylation of the 41,000- and 39,000-Da proteins selectively and decreased GABA binding to GABAB receptors in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This decrease of binding appeared to be due to the reduction of receptor affinity for agonist. The GTP-binding proteins which are ADP-ribosylated by IAP were purified from the membrane fraction of bovine cerebral cortex. The addition of the purified GTP-binding proteins to IAP-treated membranes restored the high affinity binding of GABA to GABAB receptor. The two GTP-binding proteins which were resolved by octyl-Sepharose column chromatography showed similar efficacy in restoring GABA binding. Thus, GABAB receptors are coupled to GTP-binding proteins, IAP-specific substrates, in the brain membranes.     

Mutagenesis and modeling of the GABAB receptor extracellular domain support a venus flytrap mechanism for ligand binding

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor is distantly related to the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family of G-protein-coupled receptors (family 3). Sequence comparison revealed that, like metabotropic glutamate receptors, the extracellular domain of the two GABAB receptor splice variants possesses an identical region homologous to the bacterial periplasmic leucine-binding protein (LBP), but lacks the cysteine-rich region common to all other family 3 receptors. A three-dimensional model of the LBP-like domain of the GABAB receptor was constructed based on the known structure of LBP. This model predicts that four of the five cysteine residues found in this GABAB receptor domain are important for its correct folding. This conclusion is supported by analysis of mutations of these Cys residues and a decrease in the thermostability of the binding site after dithiothreitol treatment. Additionally, Ser-246 was found to be critical for CGP64213 binding. Interestingly, this residue aligns with Ser-79 of LBP, which forms a hydrogen bond with the ligand. The mutation of Ser-269 was found to differently affect the affinity of various ligands, indicating that this residue is involved in the selectivity of recognition of GABAB receptor ligands. Finally, the mutation of two residues, Ser-247 and Gln-312, was found to increase the affinity for agonists and to decrease the affinity for antagonists. Such an effect of point mutations can be explained by the Venus flytrap model for receptor activation. This model proposes that the initial step in the activation of the receptor by agonist results from the closure of the two lobes of the binding domain.     

Identification and pharmacological characterization of domains involved in binding of CGRP receptor antagonists to the calcitonin-like receptor

The calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) and the calcitonin receptor (CTR) interact with receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) at the cell surface to form heterodimeric receptor complexes. CLR and CTR are members of the class II (family B) G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and bind calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) with similar affinities when coexpressed with RAMP1. The observation that various nonpeptide CGRP receptor antagonists display a higher affinity for the CLR/RAMP1 complex than for CTR/RAMP1 provided an opportunity to investigate the molecular determinants of the differential receptor affinities of these antagonists. A chimeric receptor approach was utilized to identify key domains within CLR responsible for conferring high-affinity antagonist binding. Initial chimera experiments implicated distinct regions within CLR as responsible for the affinities of structurally diverse CGRP receptor antagonists. Dissection of these key regions implicated amino acids 37-63 located in the amino terminus of CLR as responsible for the high-affinity interaction of one structural class, while transmembrane domain (TM) 7 was responsible for the interaction of a second class of antagonist. A unique binding interaction in the amino terminus of CLR is consistent with the observation that these compounds also interact with the extracellular region of RAMP1 and could suggest the formation of a binding pocket between the two proteins. Conversely, a compound which interacted with TM7 did not display a similar RAMP1 dependence, suggesting an allosteric mechanism of antagonism. Collectively, these data provide insight into two alternative mechanisms of antagonism for this unique heterodimeric receptor complex.     

Differential binding of ligands to the apolipoprotein E receptor 2

Apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (apoER2) is an important participant in the Reelin signaling pathway that directs cell positioning during embryogenesis. ApoER2 is a cell surface molecule that elicits intracellular signal transduction through binding of Reelin. The structural requirements for Reelin binding to apoER2 and the receptor domains involved in this process are unclear at present. Using a series of receptor mutants, we characterized the interaction of apoER2 with Reelin and compared this interaction to that of apoER2 with the receptor-associated protein (RAP), an apoER2 ligand that does not induce signaling. By surface plasmon resonance we demonstrate that apoER2 exhibits 6-fold higher affinity for Reelin than the very low density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR), which also functions as a Reelin receptor (K(D) 0.2 nM versus K(D) 1.2 nM). Acidic amino acid residues in complement-type repeat domains 1 and 3 of apoER2 are required for Reelin binding. The same regions of the receptor are also bound by RAP with a 25-fold lower affinity (K(D) 5 nM). Whereas RAP binds to apoER2 with a 1:1 stoichiometry, experimental evidence suggests that Reelin associates with two or more receptor molecules simultaneously to achieve high-affinity interaction. This finding indicates that aggregation of apoER2 by multivalent ligands such as Reelin may be the structural basis for signal transduction.     

Role of the first extracellular loop in the functional activation of CCR2. The first extracellular loop contains distinct domains necessary for both agonist binding and transmembrane signaling.

The physiological cellular responses to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a potent chemotactic and activating factor for mononuclear leukocytes, are mediated by specific binding to CCR2. The aim of this investigation is to identify receptor microdomains that are involved in high affinity agonist binding and receptor activation. The results from our functional studies in which we utilized neutralizing antisera against CCR2 are consistent with a multidomain binding model, previously proposed by others. The first extracellular loop was of particular interest, because in addition to a ligand-binding domain it contained also information for receptor activation, crucial for transmembrane signaling. Replacement of the first extracellular loop of CCR2 with the corresponding region of CCR1 decreased the MCP-1 binding affinity about 10-fold and prevented transmembrane signaling. A more detailed analysis by site-directed mutagenesis revealed that this receptor segment contains two distinct microdomains. The amino acid residues Asn(104) and Glu(105) are essential for high affinity agonist binding but are not involved in receptor activation. In contrast, the charged amino acid residue His(100) does not contribute to ligand binding but is vital for receptor activation and initiation of transmembrane signaling. We hypothesize that the interaction of agonist with this residue initiates the conformational switch that allows the formation of the functional CCR2-G protein complex.     

Assembly-dependent surface targeting of the heterodimeric GABAB Receptor is controlled by COPI but not 14-3-3

Cell surface expression of transmembrane proteins is strictly regulated. Mutually exclusive interaction with COPI or 14-3-3 proteins has been proposed as a mechanism underlying such trafficking control of various proteins. In particular, 14-3-3 dimers have been proposed to "sense" correctly assembled oligomers, allowing their surface targeting by preventing COPI-mediated intracellular retention. Here we examined whether such a mechanism is involved in the quality control of the heterodimeric G protein-coupled GABAB receptor. Its GB1 subunit, carrying the retention signal RSR, only reaches the cell surface when associated with the GB2 subunit. We show that COPI and 14-3-3 specifically bind to the GB1 RSR sequence and that COPI is involved in its intracellular retention. However, we demonstrate that the interaction with 14-3-3 is not required for proper function of the GABAB receptor quality control. Accordingly, competition between 14-3-3 and COPI cannot be considered as a general trafficking control mechanism. A possible other role for competition between COPI and 14-3-3 binding is discussed.     

Inhibition of neuronal membrane GABAB receptor binding by GABA structural analogues

1. A number of compounds structurally related to GABA were tested as inhibitors of baclofen-sensitive GABAB receptor binding to membranes from mouse brain. 2. In addition to two known inhibitors--baclofen and 5-aminovaleric acid--two analogues were shown to possess inhibitory activity. These compounds were 4-aminobutyryl-DL-alanine hydrobromide (IC50 = 3 microM) and trans-2-(aminomethyl)cyclopropane carboxylic acid (IC50 = 90 microM). 3. Both drugs also exhibited affinity for GABAA binding sites. 4. Further experiments are needed to establish if these analogues exert agonist or antagonist action at the GABAB receptor.     

Heterodimerization of gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor subunits as revealed by the yeast two-hybrid system

Several lines of evidence suggested that the first gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor to be cloned required an additional factor for functional expression. GABA(B1) was retained within the endoplasmic reticulum and failed to couple to signal transduction pathways on stimulation with agonists. In radioligand binding experiments it was found that although the affinity of antagonists showed a close agreement between rat brain membranes and membranes expressing the cloned receptor, agonist ligands were significantly weaker at recombinant receptors. Using the C-terminal tail as bait, a yeast two-hybrid screen was run against a human brain cDNA library and identified a second receptor, GABA(B2), as a major interacting protein. This interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation as well as extensive colocalization studies. Coexpression of the two seven-transmembrane proteins generated a fully functional receptor, which was expressed at the cell surface confirming the importance of receptor heterodimerization for GABA(B) receptor activity.     

Heterodimerization of γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor subunits as revealed by the yeast two-hybrid system

Several lines of evidence suggested that the first gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor to be cloned required an additional factor for functional expression. GABA(B1) was retained within the endoplasmic reticulum and failed to couple to signal transduction pathways on stimulation with agonists. In radioligand binding experiments it was found that although the affinity of antagonists showed a close agreement between rat brain membranes and membranes expressing the cloned receptor, agonist ligands were significantly weaker at recombinant receptors. Using the C-terminal tail as bait, a yeast two-hybrid screen was run against a human brain cDNA library and identified a second receptor, GABA(B2), as a major interacting protein. This interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation as well as extensive colocalization studies. Coexpression of the two seven-transmembrane proteins generated a fully functional receptor, which was expressed at the cell surface confirming the importance of receptor heterodimerization for GABA(B) receptor activity.     

Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.     

Electrostatically-driven fast association and perdeuteration allow detection of transferred cross-relaxation for G protein-coupled receptor ligands with equilibrium dissociation constants in the high-to-low nanomolar range

The mechanism of signal transduction mediated by G protein-coupled receptors is a subject of intense research in pharmacological and structural biology. Ligand association to the receptor constitutes a critical event in the activation process. Solution-state NMR can be amenable to high-resolution structure determination of agonist molecules in their receptor-bound state by detecting dipolar interactions in a transferred mode, even with equilibrium dissociation constants below the micromolar range. This is possible in the case of an inherent ultra-fast diffusive association of charged ligands onto a highly charged extracellular surface, and by slowing down the ¹H–¹H cross-relaxation by perdeuterating the receptor. Here, we demonstrate this for two fatty acid molecules in interaction with the leukotriene BLT2 receptor, for which both ligands display a submicromolar affinity.     

Analysis of parathyroid hormone (PTH)/secretin receptor chimeras differentiates the role of functional domains in the pth/ pth-related peptide (PTHrP) receptor on hormone binding and receptor activation.

The type 1 parathyroid hormore receptor (PTH1r) belongs to the class II family of G protein-coupled receptors. To delineate the sites in the PTH1r's N-terminal region, and the carboxy-core domain (transmembrane segments + extracellular loops) involved in PTH binding, we have evaluated the functional properties of 27 PTH1-secretin chimeras receptors stably expressed in HEK-293 cells. The wild type and chimeric receptors were analyzed for cell surface expression, binding for PTH and secretin, and functional responsiveness (cAMP induction) toward secretin and PTH. The expression levels of the chimeric receptors were comparable to that of the PTH1r (60-100%). The N-terminal region of PTH1r was divided into three segments that were replaced either singly or in various combinations with the homologous region of the secretin receptor (SECr). Substitution of the carboxy-terminal half (residues 105-186) of the N-terminal region of PTH1r for a SECr homologous segment did not reduced affinity for PTH but abolished signaling in response to PTH. This data indicate that receptor activation is dissociable from high affinity hormone binding in the PTH1r, and that the N-terminal region might play a critical role in the activation process. Further segment replacements in the N-termini focus on residues 105-186 and particularly residues 146-186 of PTH1r as providing critical segments for receptor activation. The data obtained suggest the existence of two distinct PTH binding sites in the PTH1r's N-terminal region: one site in the amino-terminal half (residues 1-62) (site 1) that participates in high-affinity PTH binding; and a second site of lower affinity constituted by amino acid residues scattered throughout the carboxy-terminal half (residues 105-186) (site 2). In the absence of PTH binding to site 1, higher concentrations of hormone are required to promote receptor activation. In addition, elimination of the interaction of PTH with site 2 results in a loss of signal transduction without loss of high-affinity PTH binding. Divers substitutions of the extracellular loops of the PTH1r highlight the differential role of the first- and third extracellular loop in the process of PTH1r activation after hormone binding. A chimera containing the entire extracellular domains of the PTH1r and the transmembrane + cytoplasmic domains of SECr had very low PTH binding affinity and did not signal in response to PTH. Further substitution of helix 5 of PTH1r in this chimera increased affinity for PTH that is close to the PTH affinity for the wild-type PTH1r but surprisingly, did not mediate signaling response. Additional substitutions of PTH1r's helices in various combinations emphasize the fundamental role of helix 3 and helix 6 on the activation process of the PTH1r. Overall, our studies demonstrated that several PTH1r domains contribute differentially to PTH binding affinity and signal transduction mechanism and highlight the role of the N-terminal domain and helix 3 and helix 6 on receptor activation.     

Solubilization and partial purification of GABAB receptor from bovine brain

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor has been solubilized and partially purified by an affinity column chromatography. GABAB receptor was solubilized by 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) in the presence of asolectin. The solubilized GABAB receptor was adsorbed on baclofen-coupled epoxy-activated Sepharose 6B. The affinity matrix adsorbed 80% of the solubilized [3H]GABA binding activity to GABAB receptor, and approximately 75% of the adsorbed activity could be eluted with 1 M KC1. GABAB receptor binding in the fraction eluted from affinity column was displaced by GABA, baclofen and 2-hydroxy saclofen in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the purified GABAB receptor showed approximately 2800-fold purification as compared with the original solubilized fraction and possessed the specific binding activity of 17.68 p mol/mg of protein. This binding consisted of a single binding site with a dissociation constant of 64.4 nM. The present results indicate that affinity column chromatographic procedures using baclofen-coupled epoxy-activated Sepharose 6B are suitable for the partial purification of GABAB receptor from cerebral tissues.     

Are receptors promiscuous? Intrinsic efficacy as a transduction phenomenon

The classical pharmacologic scales of agonist affinity and relative intrinsic efficacy, as utilized for drug and drug receptor classification, are examined in terms emerging concepts of receptor signal transduction. Specifically, evidence is considered that within the membrane of some cells, receptors may couple to more than one type of G-protein after agonist activation and that the relative dependence of response to different coupling proteins would make agonist efficacy a tissue dependent and not strictly a receptor dependent property. Since efficacy would depend upon the chemical nature of at least two receptor recognition domains (an extracellular domain for agonist recognition and a cytosolic domain for G-protein recognition), and agonist and antagonist affinity would depend upon only one, quantitative classification data utilizing these two scales would be divergent.     

Chimeric Fc receptors identify functional domains of the murine high affinity receptor for IgG.

Chimeric Fc gamma R have been generated between the mouse high affinity receptor for IgG (Fc gamma RI) and the low affinity receptor for IgG (Fc gamma RII) by exchanging the first two domains of the three-domain extracellular structure of Fc gamma RI with the homologous two-domain extracellular structure of Fc gamma RII. Studies of the affinity and specificity of binding of mouse Ig classes to these receptors defined functional regions of Fc gamma RI and showed some surprising results. After removal of the third extracellular domain of Fc gamma RI, the remaining two domains (domains 1 and 2) retained the capacity to bind Ig in the form of immune complexes, however, they bound monomeric IgG2a with a reduced affinity. Surprisingly, these two domains in the absence of the third domain bound not only IgG2a but also IgG1 and IgG2b, i.e., the third domain of Fc gamma RI suppresses the intrinsic capacity of the first two domains to act as a low affinity Fc gamma RII-like molecule. Linking the third extracellular domain of Fc gamma RI to the two extracellular domains of Fc gamma RII resulted in a receptor that retained the specificity and affinity of Fc gamma RII. Thus, the removal of domain 3 from Fc gamma RI resulted in the conversion of Fc gamma RI to an "Fc gamma RII-like" receptor. These findings indicate that domains 1 and 2 of Fc gamma RI form an Ig-binding motif, and although domain 3 is not essential for Fc binding by Fc gamma RI, it plays a crucial role in determining the specific high affinity interaction of Fc gamma RI with IgG2a.     

Participation of transmembrane proline 82 in angiotensin II AT1 receptor signal transduction

Most of the classical physiological effects of the octapeptide angiotensin II (AngII) are produced by activating the AT1 receptor which belongs to the G-protein coupled receptor family (GPCR). Peptidic GPCRs may be functionally divided in three regions: (i) extracellular domains involved in ligand binding; (ii) intracellular domains implicated in agonist-induced coupling to G protein and (iii) seven transmembrane domains (TM) involved in signal transduction. The TM regions of such receptors have peculiar characteristics such as the presence of proline residues. In this project we aimed to investigate the participation of two highly conserved proline residues (Pro82 and Pro162), located in TM II and TM IV, respectively, in AT1 receptor signal transduction. Both mutations did not cause major alterations in AngII affinity. Functional assays indicated that the P162A mutant did not influence the signal transduction. On the other hand, a potent deleterious effect of P82A mutation on signal transduction was observed. We believe that the Pro82 residue is crucial to signal transduction, although it is not possible to say yet if this is due to a direct participation or if due to a structural rearrangement of TM II. In this last hypothesis, the removal of proline residue might be correlated to a removal of a kink, which in turn can be involved in the correct positioning of residues involved in signal transduction.