Mechanisms of ligand binding to the parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related protein receptor: selectivity of a modified PTH(1-15) radioligand for GalphaS-coupled receptor conformations

Mechanisms of ligand binding to the PTH/PTHrP receptor (PTHR) were explored using PTH fragment analogs as radioligands in binding assays. In particular, the modified amino-terminal fragment analog, (125)I-[Aib(1,3),Nle8,Gln10,homoarginine11,Ala12,Trp14,Tyr15]rPTH(1-15)NH2, (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15), was used as a radioligand that we hypothesized to bind solely to the juxtamembrane (J) portion of the PTHR containing the extracellular loops and transmembrane helices. We also employed (125)I-PTH(1-34) as a radioligand that binds to both the amino-terminal extracellular (N) and J domains of the PTHR. Binding was examined in membranes derived from cells expressing either wild-type or mutant PTHRs. We found that the binding of (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) to the wild-type PTHR was strongly (approximately 90%) inhibited by guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS), whereas the binding of (125)I-PTH(1-34) was only mildly (approximately 25%) inhibited by GTPgammaS. Of these two radioligands, only (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) bound to PTHR-delNt, which lacks most of the receptor's N domain, and again this binding was strongly inhibited by GTPgammaS. Binding of (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) to the constitutively active receptor, PTHR-H223R, was only mildly (approximately 20%) inhibited by GTPgammaS, as was the binding of (125)I-PTH(1-34). In membranes prepared from cells lacking Galpha(S) via knockout mutation of Gnas, no binding of (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) was observed, but binding of (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) was recovered by virally transducing the cells to heterologously express Galpha(S). (125)I-PTH(1-34) bound to the membranes with or without Galpha(S). The overall findings confirm the hypothesis that (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) binds solely to the J domain of the PTHR. They further show that this binding is strongly dependent on coupling of the receptor to Galpha(S)-containing heterotrimeric G proteins, whereas the binding of (125)I-PTH(1-34) can occur in the absence of such coupling. Thus, (125)I-[Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) appears to function as a selective probe of Galpha(S)-coupled, active-state PTHR conformations.     

Altered selectivity of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related protein (PTHrP) for distinct conformations of the PTH/PTHrP receptor

PTH and PTHrP use the same G protein-coupled receptor, the PTH/PTHrP receptor (PTHR), to mediate their distinct biological actions. The extent to which the mechanisms by which the two ligands bind to the PTHR differ is unclear. We examined this question using several pharmacological and biophysical approaches. Kinetic dissociation and equilibrium binding assays revealed that the binding of [(125)I]PTHrP(1-36) to the PTHR was more sensitive to GTPgammaS (added to functionally uncouple PTHR-G protein complexes) than was the binding of [(125)I]PTH(1-34) ( approximately 75% maximal inhibition vs. approximately 20%). Fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based kinetic analyses revealed that PTHrP(1-36) bound to the PTHR more slowly and dissociated from it more rapidly than did PTH(1-34). The cAMP signaling response capacity of PTHrP(1-36) in cells decayed more rapidly than did that of PTH(1-34) (t(1/2) = approximately 1 vs. approximately 2 h). Divergent residue 5 in the ligand, Ile in PTH and His in PTHrP, was identified as a key determinant of the altered receptor-interaction responses exhibited by the two peptides. We conclude that whereas PTH and PTHrP bind similarly to the G protein-coupled PTHR conformation (RG), PTH has a greater capacity to bind to the G protein-uncoupled conformation (R(0)) and, hence, can produce cumulatively greater signaling responses (via R(0)-->RG isomerization) than can PTHrP. Such conformational selectivity may relate to the distinct modes by which PTH and PTHrP act biologically, endocrine vs. paracrine, and may help explain reported differences in the effects that the ligands have on calcium and bone metabolism when administered to humans.     

Juxtamembrane region of the amino terminus of the corticotropin releasing factor receptor type 1 is important for ligand interaction

The functional properties of the amino terminus (NT) of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1 (R1) were studied by use of murine (m) CRFR1 and rat (r) parathyroid hormone (PTH)/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor (PTH1R) chimeras. The chimeric receptor CXP, in which the NT of mCRFR1 was annealed to the TMs of PTH1R, and the reciprocal hybrid, PXC, bound radiolabeled analogues of sauvagine and PTH(3--34), respectively. Neither hybrid bound radiolabeled CRF or PTH(1--34). CRF and PTH(1--34) weakly stimulated intracellular cAMP accumulation in COS-7 cells transfected with PXC and CXP, respectively. Thus the NT is required for ligand binding and the TMs are required for agonist-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Replacing individual intercysteine segments of PXC with their mCRFR1 counterparts did not rescue CRF or sauvagine radioligand binding or stimulation of cAMP accumulation. Replacement of residues 1--31 of mCRFR1 with their PTH1R counterparts resulted in a chimeric receptor, PEC, which had normal CRFR1 functional properties. In addition, a series of chimeras (F1PEC--F6PEC) were generated by replacement of the NT intercysteine residues of PEC with their PTH1R counterparts. Only F1PEC, F2PEC, and F3PEC showed detectable CRF and sauvagine radioligand binding. All of the PEC chimeras except F5PEC increased cAMP accumulation. These data indicate that the Cys(68)(-)Glu(109) domain is important for binding and that the Cys(87)(-)Cys(102) region plays an important role in CRFR1 activation.     

Novel parathyroid hormone (PTH) antagonists that bind to the juxtamembrane portion of the PTH/PTH-related protein receptor

Current antagonists for the parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related protein (PTHrP) receptor (PTHR) are N-terminally truncated or N-terminally modified analogs of PTH(1-34) or PTHrP(1-34) and are thought to bind predominantly to the N-terminal extracellular (N) domain of the receptor. We hypothesized that ligands that bind only to PTHR region comprised of the extracellular loops and seven transmembrane helices (the juxtamembrane or J domain) could also antagonize the PTHR. To test this, we started with the J domain-selective agonists [Gln(10),Ala(12),Har(11),Trp(14),Arg(19) (M)]PTH(1-21), [M]PTH(1-15), and [M]PTH(1-14), and introduced substitutions at positions 1-3 that were predicted to dissociate PTHR binding and cAMP signaling activities. Strong dissociation was observed with the tri-residue sequence diethylglycine (Deg)(1)-para-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine (Bpa)(2)-Deg(3). In HKRK-B7 cells, which express the cloned human PTHR, [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-21), [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-15), and [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-14) fully inhibited (IC(50)s = 100-700 nm) the binding of (125)I-[alpha-aminoisobutyric acid(1,3),M]PTH(1-15) and were severely defective for stimulating cAMP accumulation. In ROS 17/2.8 cells, which express the native rat PTHR, [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-21) and [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-15) antagonized the cAMP-agonist action of PTH(1-34), as did PTHrP(5-36) (IC(50)s = 0.7 microm, 2.6 microm, and 36 nm, respectively). In COS-7 cells expressing PTHR-delNt, which lacks the N domain of the receptor, [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2), M]PTH(1-21) and [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-15) inhibited the agonist actions of [alpha-aminoisobutyric acid(1,3)]PTH(1-34) and [M]PTH(1-14) (IC(50)s approximately 1 microm), whereas PTHrP(5-36) failed to inhibit. [Deg(1,3),Bpa(2),M]PTH(1-14) inhibited the constitutive cAMP-signaling activity of PTHR-tether-PTH(1-9), in which the PTH(1-9) sequence is covalently linked to the PTHR J domain, as well as that of PTHR(cam)H223R. Thus, the J-domain-selective N-terminal PTH fragment analogs can function as antagonists as well as inverse agonists for the PTHR. The new ligands described should be useful for further studies of the ligand binding and activation mechanisms that operate in the critical PTHR J domain.     

NMR structural characterization of a minimal peptide antagonist bound to the extracellular domain of the corticotropin-releasing factor1 receptor

Natural peptide agonists of corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors bind to the receptor by a two-site mechanism as follows: the carboxyl end of the ligand binds the N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor and the amino portion of the ligand binds the extracellular face of the seven transmembrane region. Recently, peptide antagonists homologous to the 12 C-terminal residues of CRF have been derived, which bind the CRF(1) receptor through an interaction with the ECD. Here we characterized the binding of a minimal 12-residue peptide antagonist while bound to the isolated ECD of the CRF(1) receptor. We have expressed and purified soluble and properly folded ECD independent from the seven-transmembrane region as a thioredoxin fusion protein in Escherichia coli. A model of the peptide antagonist, cyclic corticotrophin-releasing factor residues 30-41 (cCRF(30-41)), was calculated while bound to the recombinant ECD using transferred nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy. Although the peptide is unstructured in solution, it adopts an alpha-helical conformation when bound to the ECD. Residues of cCRF(30-41) comprising the binding interface with the ECD were mapped using saturation transfer difference NMR. Two hydrophobic residues (Met(38) and Ile(41)) as well as two amide groups (Asn(34) and the C-terminal amide) on one face of the helix defined the binding epitope of the antagonist. This epitope may be used as a starting point for development of non-peptide antagonists targeting the ECD of this receptor.     

Mapping the bimolecular interface of the parathyroid hormone (PTH)-PTH1 receptor complex: spatial proximity between Lys(27) (of the hormone principal binding domain) and leu(261) (of the first extracellular loop) of the human PTH1 receptor

In an effort to characterize the bimolecular interface between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and its human receptor PTH1-Rc (hPTH1-Rc), we previously identified two contact sites in the receptor: one for position 1 and another for position 13 (located at the ends of the principal activation domain) in PTH(1-34). The present study reports a third, novel "contact site" between hPTH1-Rc and Lys(27) of PTH(1-34). Lys(27) is located in the principal binding domain of the hormone (residues 25-34). The photoreactive PTH(1-34) analogue K27 contains a benzophenone (BP) moiety on Lys(27). The analogue binds to stably transfected HEK 293/C-21 cells (which express a high level of recombinant hPTH1-Rc) and stimulates adenylyl cyclase activity with a potency similar to PTH(1-34). In addition, (125)I-K27 cross-links effectively and specifically to the hPTH1-Rc. Enzymatic (Glu-C and Lys-C) and chemical (CNBr and BNPS-skatole) digestions of the photoconjugate between (125)I-K27 and hPTH1-Rc were performed. In addition, photoconjugates involving the bioactive mutants [L261M]- and [R262K]-hPTH1-Rc, transiently expressed in COS-7 cells, were also digested. The data obtained clearly identify L(261) or R(262) of the first extracellular loop of hPTH1-Rc as the contact site for Lys(27) in the hormone. On the basis of (i) the similarity in molecular mass between the CNBr digest of the (125)I-K27-[L261M]hPTH1-Rc conjugate and free (125)I-K27 and (ii) the failure to cross-link (125)I-K27 to a bioactive mutant receptor [L261A]hPTH1-Rc, we conclude that L(261) is the cross-linking site. These results provide the first demonstration of an interaction between the principal binding domain of PTH and the first extracellular loop of hPTH1-Rc. Revealing proximity of Lys(27) (in PTH) to L(261) (in hPTH1-Rc) provides additional insight into the nature of the ligand-receptor bimolecular interface and clearly illustrates that the extracellular loops of the receptor contribute to the specificity of the PTH-PTH1-Rc interaction. Taken together with previous studies, the new findings add important constraints on the possible positioning of the C-terminal helix of PTH (which contains the principal binding domain) relative to the first extracellular loop and the distal C-terminal helix of the large extracellular amino terminal domain of the PTH1-Rc.     

Characterisation of ligand binding to the parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor in MCF7 breast cancer cells and SaOS-2 osteosarcoma cells

Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) and parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTHrP-receptor, PTH/PTHrP-R, are frequently expressed in mammary carcinomas as well as in bone cells. In this study we compared the ligand binding characteristics of the PTH/PTHrP-R in SaOS-2 human osteosarcoma cells with those in MCF7 breast cancer cells. We used both Scatchard analysis of saturation kinetics for iodinated ligand and the level of expressed receptor protein by visualising the single radio-labelled receptor-ligand complex from isolated membrane preparations from the two cell lines. In MCF7 cells, ligand binding, (receptor number) was increased by prior exposure of the cultured cells to epidermal growth factor (EGF), estradiol (E2), or dexamethasone (DEX), and decreased following calcitriol (1,25 DHCC). In contrast in the SaOS-2 cells, PTH/PTHrP-R number was increased by exposure to E2 and 1,25DHCC and decreased by DEX while EGF had no effect. These data were confirmed when the PTH/PTHrP-R was cross linked with (125)I-PTHrP-1-34(Tyr), and extended by visualising the intensity of the isolated radiolabelled receptor complex by autoradiography following SDS-PAGE at several time points during the treatment.     

Molecular determinants of tuberoinfundibular peptide of 39 residues (TIP39) selectivity for the parathyroid hormone-2 (PTH2) receptor. N-terminal truncation of TIP39 reverses PTH2 receptor/PTH1 receptor binding selectivity

Tuberoinfundibular peptide of 39 residues (TIP39) and the parathyroid hormone-2 (PTH2) receptor form part of an extended family of related signaling molecules that includes the PTH1 receptor, which responds to PTH and PTH-related protein. TIP39 does not appreciably activate the PTH1 receptor, but in this study it is shown to bind the receptor with moderate affinity (59 nm). In this study, we investigated the molecular determinants of both ligand and receptor for the PTH2 receptor selectivity of TIP39 and quantitatively evaluated the role of molecular elements in the binding of TIP39 to the PTH2 and PTH1 receptors. A chimeric receptor composed of the N-terminal extracellular domain of the PTH1 receptor and the remainder (juxtamembrane domain) of the PTH2 receptor (P2-NP1) was fully activated by TIP39 (E(max) = 98% of the rPTH-(1-34), E(max), EC(50) = 2.0 nm). This receptor chimera bound TIP39 with an equivalent affinity to the wild-type PTH2 receptor (2. 3 and 2.0 nm, respectively). The reciprocal chimeric receptor (P1-NP2) was not activated by TIP39 and bound the ligand with an affinity equivalent to that of the PTH1 receptor. Thus, the juxtamembrane receptor domain specifies the signaling and binding selectivity of TIP39 for the PTH2 receptor over the PTH1 receptor. Removing six N-terminal residues of TIP39 eliminated activation of the PTH2 receptor and reduced binding affinity 70-fold. In contrast, this truncation increased affinity for the PTH1 receptor 10-fold, reversing the PTH2/PTH1 receptor binding selectivity and resulting in a high affinity interaction of TIP-(7-39) with the PTH1 receptor (6 nm). These findings can be explained by a strong interaction between the N-terminal region of TIP39 and the juxtamembrane domain of the PTH2 receptor, with the corresponding domain of the PTH1 receptor acting as a selectivity barrier against high affinity binding of TIP39. As a result, TIP-(7-39) is a highly potent, selective antagonist for the PTH1 receptor.     

Parathyroid hormone (PTH)-(1-14) and -(1-11) analogs conformationally constrained by alpha-aminoisobutyric acid mediate full agonist responses via the juxtamembrane region of the PTH-1 receptor

The N-terminal portion of parathyroid hormone is critical for PTH-1 receptor (P1R) activation and has been postulated to be alpha-helical when bound to the receptor. We investigated whether substitution of the sterically hindered and helix-promoting amino acid alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) in N-terminal PTH oligopeptides would improve the capacity of the peptide to activate the P1R. Analysis of the effects of individual Aib substitutions at each position in [Ala(3,12),Gln(10),Har(11),Trp(14)]PTH(1-14)NH(2) ([M]PTH(1-14)) on cAMP-stimulating potency in HKRK-B28 cells revealed that Aib at most positions diminished potency; however, Aib at positions 1 and 3 enhanced potency. Thus [Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-14) was approximately 100-fold more potent than [M]PTH(1-14) (EC(50) = 1.1 +/- 0.1 and 100 +/- 20 nm, respectively), approximately 100,000-fold more potent than native PTH(1-14), and 2-fold more potent than PTH(1-34). The shorter peptide, [Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-11), was also fully efficacious and 1,000-fold more potent than [M]PTH(1-11) (EC(50) 4 +/- 1 nm versus 3 +/- 1 microm). In cAMP stimulation assays performed in COS-7 cells expressing P1R-delNt, a receptor that lacks most of the N-terminal extracellular domain, [Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-14) was 50-fold more potent than [M]PTH(1-14) (EC(50) = 0.7 +/- 0.2 versus 40 +/- 2 nm) and 1,000-fold more potent than PTH(1-34) (EC(50) = 700 nm). [Aib(1,3),M]PTH(1-14), but not PTH(1-34), inhibited the binding of (125)I-[Aib(1,3),Nle(8),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14),Arg(19),Tyr(21)]PTH(1-21)NH(2) to hP1R-delNt (IC(50) = 1,600 +/- 200 nm). The Aib(1,3) substitutions in otherwise unmodified PTH(1-34) enhanced potency and binding affinity on hP1R-delNt, but they had no effect for this peptide on hP1R-WT. Circular dichroism spectroscopy demonstrated that the Aib-1,3 substitutions increased helicity in all peptides tested, including PTH(1-34). The overall data thus suggest that the N-terminal residues of PTH are intrinsically disordered but become conformationally constrained, possibly as an alpha-helix, upon interaction with the activation domain of the PTH-1 receptor.     

Functional evidence for an intramolecular side chain interaction between residues 6 and 10 of receptor-bound parathyroid hormone analogues

The N-terminal domain of PTH(1-34) is critical for PTH-1 receptor (P1R) activation and has been postulated to be alpha-helical when bound to the receptor. We investigated the possibility that the side chains of residues 6 (Gln) and 10 (Gln or Asn) of PTH analogues, which would align on the same face of the predicted alpha-helix, could interact and thereby contribute to the PTH/P1R interaction process. We utilized PTH(1-11), PTH(1-14), and PTH(1-34) analogues substituted with alanine at one or both of these positions and functionally evaluated the peptides in cell lines (HKRK-B7 and HKRK-B28) stably expressing the P1R, as well as in COS-7 cells transiently expressing either the P1R or a P1R construct that lacks the amino-terminal extracellular domain (P1R-DelNt). In HKRK-B7 cells, the single substitutions of Gln(6) --> Ala and Gln(10) --> Ala reduced the cAMP-stimulating potency of [Ala(3),Gln(10),Arg(11)]rPTH(1-11)NH(2) approximately 60- and approximately 2-fold, respectively, whereas the combined Ala(6,10) substitution resulted in a approximately 2-fold gain in potency, relative to the single Ala(6) substitution. Similar effects on P1R-mediated cAMP-signaling potency and P1R-binding affinity were observed for these substitutions in [Aib(1,3),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14)]rPTH(1-14)NH(2). Installation of a lactam bridge between the Lys(6) and the Glu(10) side chains of [Ala(3,12),Lys(6),Glu(10),Har(11),Trp(14)]rPTH(1-14)NH(2) increased signaling potency 6-fold, relative to the nonbridged linear analogue. Alanine substitutions at positions 6 and/or 10 of [Tyr(34)]hPTH(1-34)NH(2) did not affect signaling potency nor binding affinity on the intact P1R; however, Ala(6) abolished PTH(1-34) signaling on P1R-DelNt, and this effect was reversed by Ala(10). The overall data support the hypothesis that the N-terminal portion of PTH is alpha-helical when bound to the activation domain of the PTH-1 receptor and they further suggest that intrahelical side chain interactions between residues 6 and 10 of the ligand can contribute to the receptor interaction process.     

Quantitative analysis of agonist-dependent parathyroid hormone receptor trafficking in whole cells using a functional green fluorescent protein conjugate.

Many G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) undergo ligand-dependent internalization upon activation. The parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor undergoes endocytosis following prolonged exposure to ligand although the ultimate fate of the receptor following internalization is largely unknown. To investigate compartmentalization of the PTH receptor, we have established a stable cell line expressing a PTH receptor-green fluorescent protein (PTHR-GFP) conjugate and an algorithm to quantify PTH receptor internalization. HEK 293 cells expressing the PTHR-GFP were compared with cells expressing the wild-type PTH receptor in whole-cell binding and functional assays. 125I-PTH binding studies revealed similar Bmax and kD values in cells expressing either the PTHR-GFP or the wild-type PTH receptor. PTH-induced cAMP accumulation was similar in both cell lines suggesting that addition of the GFP to the cytoplasmic tail of the PTH receptor does not alter the ligand binding or G-protein coupling properties of the receptor. Using confocal fluorescence microscopy, we demonstrated that PTH treatment of cells expressing the PTHR-GFP conjugate produced a time-dependent redistribution of the receptor to the endosomal compartment which was blocked by pretreatment with PTH antagonist peptides. Treatment with hypertonic sucrose prevented PTH-induced receptor internalization, suggesting that the PTH receptor internalizes via a clathrin-dependent mechanism. Moreover, co-localization with internalized transferrin showed that PTHR-GFP trafficking utilized the endocytic recycling compartment. Experiments using cycloheximide to inhibit protein synthesis demonstrated that recycling of the PTHR-GFP back to the plasma membrane was complete within 1-2 h of ligand removal and was partially blocked by pretreatment with cytochalasin D, but not nocodazole. We also demonstrated that the PTH receptor, upon recycling to the plasma membrane, is capable of undergoing a second round of internalization, a finding consistent with a role for receptor recycling in functional resensitization.     

Purification and characterization of a receptor for human parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide

The human parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor (hPTH1R), containing a 9-amino acid sequence of rhodopsin at its C terminus, was transiently expressed in COS-7 cells and solubilized with 0.25% n-dodecyl maltoside. Approximately 18 microg of hPTH1R were purified to homogeneity per mg of crude membranes by single-step affinity chromatography using 1D4, a monoclonal antibody to a rhodopsin epitope. The N terminus of the hPTH1R is Tyr(23), consistent with removal of the 22-amino acid signal peptide. Comparisons of hPTH1R by quantitative immunoblotting and Scatchard analysis revealed that 75% of the receptors in membrane preparations were functional; there was little, if any, loss of functional receptors during purification. The binding affinity of the purified hPTH1R was slightly lower than membrane-embedded hPTH1R (K(d) = 16.5 +/- 1.3 versus 11.9 +/- 1.9 nm), and the purified receptors bound rat [Nle(8,21),Tyr(34)]PTH-(1-34)-NH(2) (PTH-(1-34)), and rat [Ile(5),Trp(23),Tyr(36)]PTHrP-(5-36)-NH(2) with indistinguishable affinity. Maximal displacement of (125)I-PTH-(1-34) binding by rat [alpha-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib)(1,3),Nle(8),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14),Arg(19),Tyr(21)]PTH-(1-21)-NH(2) and rat [Aib(1,3),Gln(10),Har(11),Ala(12),Trp(14)]PTH-(1-14)-NH(2) of 80 and 10%, respectively, indicates that both N-terminal and juxtamembrane ligand binding determinants are functional in the purified hPTH1R. Finally, PTH stimulated [(35)S]GTP gamma S incorporation into G alpha(s) in a time- and dose-dependent manner, when recombinant hPTH1R, G alpha(s)-, and beta gamma-subunits were reconstituted in phospholipid vesicles. The methods described will enable structural studies of the hPTH1R, and they provide an efficient and general technique to purify proteins, particularly those of the class II G protein-coupled receptor family.     

Ligand affinity for amino-terminal and juxtamembrane domains of the corticotropin releasing factor type I receptor: regulation by G-protein and nonpeptide antagonists

Peptide ligands bind the CRF(1) receptor by a two-domain mechanism: the ligand's carboxyl-terminal portion binds the receptor's extracellular N-terminal domain (N-domain) and the ligand's amino-terminal portion binds the receptor's juxtamembrane domain (J-domain). Little quantitative information is available regarding this mechanism. Specifically, the microaffinity of the two interactions and their contribution to overall ligand affinity are largely undetermined. Here we measured ligand interaction with N- and J-domains expressed independently, the former (residues 1-118) fused to the activin IIB receptor's membrane-spanning alpha-helix (CRF(1)-N) and the latter comprising residues 110-415 (CRF(1)-J). We also investigated the effect of nonpeptide antagonist and G-protein on ligand affinity for N- and J-domains. Peptide agonist affinity for CRF(1)-N was only 1.1-3.5-fold lower than affinity for the whole receptor (CRF(1)-R), suggesting the N-domain predominantly contributes to peptide agonist affinity. Agonist interaction with CRF(1)-J (potency for stimulating cAMP accumulation) was 12000-1500000-fold weaker than with CRF(1)-R, indicating very weak direct agonist interaction with the J-domain. Nonpeptide antagonist affinity for CRF(1)-J and CRF(1)-R was indistinguishable, indicating the compounds bind predominantly the J-domain. Agonist activation of CRF(1)-J was fully blocked by nonpeptide antagonist, suggesting antagonism results from inhibition of agonist-J-domain interaction. G-protein coupling with CRF(1)-R (forming RG) increased peptide agonist affinity 92-1300-fold, likely resulting from enhanced agonist interaction with the J-domain rather than the N-domain. Nonpeptide antagonists, which bind the J-domain, blocked peptide agonist binding to RG, and binding of peptide antagonists, predominantly to the N-domain, was unaffected by R-G coupling. These findings extend the two-domain model quantitatively and are consistent with a simple equilibrium model of the two-domain mechanism: (1) The N-domain binds peptide agonist with moderate-to-high microaffinity, substantially increasing the local concentration of agonist and so allowing weak agonist-J-domain interaction. (2) Agonist-J-domain interaction is allosterically enhanced by receptor-G-protein interaction and inhibited by nonpeptide antagonist.     

The hydrophobic residues phenylalanine 184 and leucine 187 in the type-1 parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor functionally interact with the amino-terminal portion of PTH-(1-34).

Recent mutagenesis and cross-linking studies suggest that three regions of the PTH-1 receptor play important roles in ligand interaction: (i) the extreme NH(2)-terminal region, (ii) the juxtamembrane base of the amino-terminal extracellular domain, and (iii) the third extracellular loop. In this report, we analyzed the second of these segments in the rat PTH-1 receptor (residues 182-190) and its role in functional interaction with short PTH fragment analogs. Twenty-eight singly substituted PTH-1 receptors were transiently transfected into COS-7 cells and shown to be fully expressed by surface antibody binding analysis. Alanine-scanning analysis identified Phe(184), Arg(186), Leu(187), and Ile(190) as important determinants of maximum binding of (125)I-labeled bovine PTH-(1-34) and (125)I-labeled bovine PTH-(3-34) and determinants of responsiveness to the NH(2)-terminal analog, PTH-(1-14) in cAMP stimulation assays. Alanine mutations at these four sites augmented the ability of the COOH-terminal peptide [Glu(22), Trp(23)]PTHrP-(15-36) to inhibit the cAMP response induced by PTH-(1-34). At Phe(184) and Leu(187), hydrophobic substitutions (e.g. Ile, Met, or Leu) preserved PTH-(1-34)-mediated cAMP signaling potency, whereas hydrophilic substitutions (e.g. Asp, Glu, Lys, or Arg) weakened this response by 20-fold or more, as compared with the unsubstituted receptor's response. The results suggest that hydrophobicity at positions occupied by Phe(184) and Leu(187) in the PTH-1 receptor plays an important role in determining functional interaction with the 3-14 portion of PTH.     

The (1-14) fragment of parathyroid hormone (PTH) activates intact and amino-terminally truncated PTH-1 receptors.

Recent mutagenesis and cross-linking studies suggest that residues in the carboxyl-terminal portion of PTH(1-34) interact with the amino-terminal extracellular domain of the receptor and thereby contribute strongly to binding energy; and that residues in the amino-terminal portion of the ligand interact with the receptor region containing the transmembrane helices and extracellular loops and thereby induce second messenger signaling. We investigated the latter component of this hypothesis using the short amino-terminal fragment PTH(1-14) and a truncated rat PTH-1 receptor (r delta Nt) that lacks most of the amino-terminal extracellular domain. The binding of PTH(1-14) to LLC-PK1 or COS-7 cells transfected with the intact PTH-1 receptor was too weak to detect; however, PTH(1-14) dose-dependently stimulated cAMP formation in these cells over the dose range of 1-100 microM. PTH(1-14) also stimulated cAMP formation in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with r delta Nt, and its potency with this receptor was nearly equal to that seen with the intact receptor. In contrast, PTH(1-34) was approximately 100-fold weaker in potency with r delta Nt than it was with the intact receptor. Alanine scanning of PTH(1-14) revealed that for both the intact and truncated receptors, the 1-9 segment of PTH forms a critical receptor activation domain. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the amino-terminal portion of PTH(1-34) interacts with the juxtamembrane regions of the PTH-1 receptor and that these interactions are sufficient for initiating signal transduction.     

Molecular cloning and functional characterization of the canine parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone related peptide receptor (PTH1)

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a major mediator of calcium and phosphate metabolism through its interactions with receptors in kidney and bone. PTH binds with high affinity to PTH1 and PTH2, members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. In order to clone the canine PTH1 receptor, a canine kidney cDNA library was screened using the human PTH1 receptor cDNA and two clones were further characterized. The longest clone was 2177 bp and contained a single open reading frame of 1785 bp, potentially encoding a protein of 595 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 66.4 kD. This open reading frame exhibits >91% identity to the human PTH1 receptor cDNA and >95% identity when the putative canine and human protein sequences are compared. Competition binding following transfection of the canine PTH1 receptor into CHO cells demonstrated specific displacement of ¹²⁵I-human PTH 1-34 by canine PTH 1-34, human PTH 1-34, and canine/human parathyroid hormone related peptide (PTHrP) 1-34. Treatment of canine PTH1 receptor transfected cells, but not mock transfected cells, with these ligands also resulted in increased levels of intracellular cAMP. In contrast, the non-related aldosterone secretion inhibiting factor 1-35 neither bound nor activated the canine PTH1 receptor. Northern blot analysis revealed high levels of PTH1 receptor mRNA in the kidney, with much lower, but detectable, levels in aorta, heart, lung, prostate, testis, and skeletal muscle. Together, these data indicate that we have cloned the canine PTH1 receptor and that it is very similar, both in sequence and in functional characteristics, to the other known PTH1 receptors.     

Structural Basis for Parathyroid Hormone-related Protein Binding to the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor and Design of Conformation-selective Peptides

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related protein (PTHrP) are two related peptides that control calcium/phosphate homeostasis and bone development, respectively, through activation of the PTH/PTHrP receptor (PTH1R), a class B G protein-coupled receptor. Both peptides hold clinical interest for their capacities to stimulate bone formation. PTH and PTHrP display different selectivity for two distinct PTH1R conformations, but how their binding to the receptor differs is unclear. The high resolution crystal structure of PTHrP bound to the extracellular domain (ECD) of PTH1R reveals that PTHrP binds as an amphipathic α-helix to the same hydrophobic groove in the ECD as occupied by PTH, but in contrast to a straight, continuous PTH helix, the PTHrP helix is gently curved and C-terminally “unwound.” The receptor accommodates the altered binding modes by shifting the side chain conformations of two residues within the binding groove: Leu-41 and Ile-115, the former acting as a rotamer toggle switch to accommodate PTH/PTHrP sequence divergence, and the latter adapting to the PTHrP curvature. Binding studies performed with PTH/PTHrP hybrid ligands having reciprocal exchanges of residues involved in different contacts confirmed functional consequences for the altered interactions and enabled the design of altered PTH and PTHrP peptides that adopt the ECD-binding mode of the opposite peptide. Hybrid peptides that bound the ECD poorly were selective for the G protein-coupled PTH1R conformation. These results establish a molecular model for better understanding of how two biologically distinct ligands can act through a single receptor and provide a template for designing better PTH/PTHrP therapeutics.The parathyroid hormone receptor (PTH1R)³ is a class B G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that transduces signals from two related signaling molecules that have distinct functions in biology: parathyroid hormone (PTH) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) (Ref. 1; reviewed in Ref. 2). PTH is an 84-amino acid polypeptide endocrine hormone that is produced by the parathyroid glands and secreted into the circulation in response to low calcium levels (reviewed in Refs. 3–5), to act on bone and kidney cells and thus restore blood calcium to normal levels. In bone, PTH directly stimulates osteoblasts, resulting in bone formation (reviewed in Ref. 6), which in turn activate osteoclasts to induce bone resorption. In the kidney, PTH stimulates the reabsorption of filtered calcium, inhibits the reabsorption of phosphate, and stimulates the synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. The paradoxical anabolic/catabolic actions of PTH on bone can be modulated by exogenous PTH, and provide the molecular basis for the clinical use of PTH as an anabolic therapy for osteoporosis (7). Anabolic PTH therapy requires intermittent administration to minimize bone-resorptive effects, which predominate with sustained administration of PTH. PTHrP is a 141-amino acid polypeptide that was originally isolated as the factor responsible for humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (8–11) and was subsequently shown to be a critical developmental paracrine factor that controls endochondral bone formation (Refs. 12, 13; reviewed in Ref. 14). PTHrP can also mediate bone-anabolic effects when administered to osteoporosis patients (15) and has been suggested to be more anabolic than PTH due to a differential effect on the coupled bone formation and resorptive responses (16).PTH and PTHrP are encoded by separate genes, each of which is found in vertebrate species ranging from fish to man. How PTH and PTHrP evolved to mediate distinct biological activities: calcium/phosphate homeostasis and tissue development, respectively, via actions upon a single receptor, remains unclear. Amino acid sequence homology is most apparent in the first 34-residue segments of the proteins, and N-terminal 34-residue peptide fragments of PTH and PTHrP are sufficient for high affinity binding to the PTH1R and are generally found to be equally potent for stimulating cAMP formation in PTH1R-expressing cells (1). The interaction of the (1–34)-length ligand with the PTH1R has been postulated to follow a “two-domain” model: residues within the approximate (1–14) segment interact with the 7-transmembrane (7-TM) helical domain embedded in the membrane, and residues within the approximate (15–34) segment interact with the N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor (17, 18). The 1–14 domains of PTH and PTHrP share eight amino acid sequence identities, reflecting a critical role in activating the receptor (18), while the 15–34 domains share only three amino acid identities, despite a critical role in imparting high affinity binding to the receptor.Recent studies suggest that PTH and PTHrP differ in their relative capacities to bind to two pharmacologically distinguishable high-affinity PTH1R conformations (19–22). One conformation, termed R⁰, is stable in the presence of GTPγS, but presumably in the absence of G protein coupling, correlates with prolonged signaling responses in vitro and in vivo, and is bound preferentially by PTH-(1–34). The other conformation, termed RG, is sensitive to GTPγS addition, promoted by the overexpression of a high affinity variant of Gα_s, and bound preferentially by PTHrP-(1–36). A mechanistic basis for the differing capacities of PTH and PTHrP ligands to bind to these altered PTH1R conformations is not clear at present, although, both the (1–14) and (15–34) portions of PTH contribute importantly to the capacity to bind stably to the proposed R⁰ conformation (19, 21, 22).We previously developed a method that allowed us to determine the high resolution crystal structure of recombinant PTH1R ECD in complex with the 15–34 synthetic fragment of PTH (23). The PTH1R ECD adopts a tertiary fold that is conserved among class B GPCR ECDs (24–26), and the PTH(15–34)NH₂ domain binds as a continuous and straight amphipathic α-helix to a hydrophobic groove in the ECD. Here we present the high resolution crystal structure of the PTHrP 12–34 fragment in complex with the PTH1R ECD, which reveals a distinct docking conformation toward the C terminus of the PTHrP peptide. Based on the structural differences, we designed hybrid PTH/PTHrP peptides exchanged for residues involved in altered ECD contacts; functional analyses of these peptides confirmed that the altered modes of binding indeed translate into functional consequences in terms of receptor affinity. These results provide critical insights into how PTH and PTHrP can act through a single receptor, and a structural model for designing better PTH/PTHrP analogs for treating osteoporosis.