对叶榕传粉小蜂性比率的调节和稳定

传粉榕小蜂呈现偏雌的性比率,单双倍体性别决定系统、局域配偶竞争和近交效应被认为是调节偏雌性比率的3个主要机制。通过研究影响对叶榕传粉小蜂性比率的因素,结果表明传粉榕小蜂的偏雌性比率随局域配偶竞争强度的降低而增加;受母代雌蜂交配次数的影响,随着母代雌蜂交配次数的增加,子代的偏雌性比率逐渐降低,这一结果首次揭示了传粉榕小蜂的交配制次数对性比率的影响,并在个体水平上定量了性比率变异与雌蜂交配频次的关系。传粉小蜂的性比率与共生的非传粉小蜂的关系,非传粉小蜂的介入直接减少了传粉小蜂的数量,甚至对传粉小蜂的种群有显著影响,结果发现非传粉小蜂对传粉小蜂雌雄性的分配比率没有显著影响,传粉榕小蜂仍能正常地进行繁殖。传粉与非传粉者小蜂之间作用关系的确定,可为进一步理解两者的稳定共生的机制提供科学证据。     

环纹榕传粉榕小蜂的传粉模式

榕小蜂的传粉结构、 传粉行为以及寄主榕树的花药胚珠比是判断榕-蜂互惠系统传粉模式的重要依据。本研究于2010年8月至2011年6月对位于云南西双版纳地区的试验样树环纹榕Ficus annulata进行观察, 对出榕果的环纹榕传粉榕小蜂Deilagaon annulatae进行电镜扫描和室内显微镜下对其进行行为观察。电镜扫描显示： 环纹榕传粉榕小蜂D. annulatae位于胸部的花粉筐消失, 具一片可粘附花粉的毛区, 提示其属于被动传粉的种类。传粉行为观察发现, 该蜂没有主动采集花粉的行为, 显然存在的花粉刷已丧失了主动收集花粉的功能。寄主植物环纹榕F. annulata属于典型的自动散粉让榕小蜂沾附花粉的榕树种类。环纹榕传粉榕小蜂D. annulatae是西双版纳热带地区已知58种传粉榕小蜂中唯一体色为黄色的种类, 该蜂偏爱在低温的夜晚出蜂。除了传粉榕小蜂, 一种金小蜂Lipothymus sp.也在雌花期进入榕果内繁殖, 并且其数量显著高于环纹榕传粉榕小蜂D. annulatae (P<0.0001)。自然单果的繁殖中, 环纹榕传粉榕小蜂的数量显著高于种子数量, 呈现出榕-蜂互惠系统中罕见的传粉榕小蜂主导的局面。综合榕-蜂的传粉特征显示, 环纹榕F. annulata及其传粉榕小蜂D. annulatae互惠系统是被动传粉的模式。     

西双版纳热带雨林对叶榕传粉生物学

研究了西双版纳热带雨林地区雌雄异株植物对叶榕（Ficus hispida L.）的生物学,传粉物候学以及榕小蜂（Ceratosolen solmsi marchali Mayr）的传粉和繁殖行为,研究结果表明：雌雄异株的对叶榕与其他雌雄同株的榕属植物不同,它的种子形成与传粉有着更为复杂的相互关系。对叶榕一年结隐花果6～8,结果高峰期4～5次,其中雄性植株仅产生花粉和榕育榕小蜂,而雄性植株（无雄蕊）则需榕小蜂带花粉进入隐花果内,进行传粉授精,使之发育成种子,对叶榕的成熟花粉不能从花药开裂处自行散发出来,必须由榕小蜂采集才能散落,榕小蜂雌蜂羽化、交配后,找到雄花区,用足、触角、口器在推动中采集花粉,雌蜂飞来熟榕果找寻雌株或雄株榕树上的幼嫩隐花果,一般需3～7min;一部分雌蜂在雄株中寻找幼嫩的隐花果,进去产卵繁殖,另一部分雌蜂则寻找雌株雌花期嫩隐花果进去传粉。雌蜂在雌株榕树的隐花果内传粉时间为15～23h,在雄株榕树的隐花果内产卵时间为6～9h,对叶榕小蜂在雌株上进入单个隐花果的数量多少关系到雌花结实率;观察表明,每个隐花果最佳进蜂数为2头;榕小蜂传粉后榕树成熟种子形成率在54.1%～82.5%之间,平均为73.8%,而在雄株上雌蜂进蜂数量则关系到榕小蜂在隐花果内的产卵率,每个隐花果最佳进蜂数为3～4头,产卵率在72.3%～93.8%之间,平均为84.4%。     

木瓜榕传粉榕小蜂与一种非传粉榕小蜂核型比较分析

【目的】为了明确木瓜榕传粉榕小蜂Ceratosolen emarginatus Mayr及另外一种寄生于木瓜榕雌果内的非传粉小蜂Platyneura sp.染色体核型特征和差异。【方法】本研究采用小牛血清培养脑神经节的方法对寄生于木瓜榕Ficus auriculata Loureiro的两种小蜂进行了染色体核型比较分析。【结果】木瓜榕传粉小蜂的染色体数目为2n(♀)=10,染色体臂指数NF值为20,整个染色体组包含5对中着丝粒染色体,核型类别属Stebbins-1A型;非传粉小蜂Platyneura sp.的染色体数目为2n=12,染色体臂指数NF值为24,染色体组全部为中着丝粒染色体,核型类别属Stebbins-1A型。【结论】两种小蜂除染色体类型和核型类别相同,在其他染色体特征方面均表现出差异。结合前人和本研究结果,我们推测两种小蜂之间染色体核型可能发生了由传粉者向非传粉者的演化,即发生了染色体数目由少到多的演化。     

影响对叶榕及其传粉者繁殖的生态学因素

在西双版纳,分别统计了对叶榕(Ficus hispida)雌花期雌雄果的进蜂量和花后期雌雄果繁殖的多个特征值,以此来探讨自然条件下,影响对叶榕及其传粉榕小蜂(Ceratosolen solmsi marchali)繁殖的因素。结果表明:单果内有效进蜂数量是影响种子生产和传粉榕小蜂繁殖的首要因素,而雌花期进果的传粉榕小蜂并不是都能全部进入果腔传粉或产卵,大部分蜂还未进到果腔就被夹死在顶生苞片层的通道里,能进入雌果内传粉的榕小蜂为(2.72±2.04)只·果^-1,约占总进蜂量的52%;而在雄果里,能进入果腔的蜂量只有(2.08±1.65)只·果^-1,占35%左右。由于雌果内的雌花显著比雄果内的雌花多,结合单果进蜂量雌多雄少的格局,最终单果生产的种子数量 (1 891.63 ± 471.53)比传粉榕小蜂的数量 (367.20 ± 208.02) 多5倍有余。在雌果里,供给传粉的雌花数量与所生产的种子数量之间呈显著的正相关,而没有接受到花粉或不能正常受精的雌花数量与种子数量呈显著的负相关。雄果不仅生产花粉,也是传粉榕小蜂繁殖的场所,在相关于传粉榕小蜂自身繁殖力的因子中,传粉榕小蜂产卵制造的瘿花数量对其种群数量有最大的影响;影响次之的是发育过程中死亡的个体数量,它可降低30%左右的传粉榕小蜂数量;影响排在第三位的是寄主的雌花数量。此外,3类非传粉者的存在,单果内平均可减少30多只传粉小蜂。     

西双版纳热带雨林对叶榕传粉生物学

研究了西双版纳热带雨林地区雌雄异株植物对叶榕(Ficus hispida L.)的生物学、传粉物候学以及榕小蜂(Ceratosolen solmsi marchali Mayr)的传粉和繁殖行为.研究结果表明:雌雄异株的对叶榕与其他雌雄同株的榕属植物不同,它的种子形成与传粉者有着更为复杂的相互关系.对叶榕一年结隐花果6～8次,结果高峰期4～5次,其中雄性植株仅产生花粉和孕育榕小蜂,而雌性植株(无雄蕊)则需榕小蜂带花粉进入隐花果内,进行传粉授精,使之发育成种子.对叶榕的成熟花粉不能从花药开裂处自行散发出来,必须由榕小蜂采集才能散落.榕小蜂雌蜂羽化、交配后,找到雄花区,用足、触角、口器在推动中采集花粉.雌蜂飞出熟榕果找寻雌株或雄株榕树上的幼嫩隐花果,一般需3～67 min;一部分雌蜂在雄株中寻找幼嫩的隐花果,进去产卵繁殖,另一部分雌蜂则寻找雌株雌花期嫩隐花果进去传粉.雌蜂在雌株榕树的隐花果内传粉时间为15～23 h,在雄株榕树的隐花果内产卵时间为6～9 h.对叶榕小蜂在雌株上进入单个隐花果的数量多少关系到雌花结实率;观察表明,每个隐花果最佳进蜂数为2头;榕小蜂传粉后榕树成熟种子形成率在54.1%～82.5%之间,平均为73.8%;而在雄株上雌蜂进蜂数量则关系到榕小蜂在隐花果内的产卵率,每个隐花果最佳进蜂数为3～4头,产卵率在72.3%～93.8%之间,平均为84.4%.     

垂叶榕上16种榕小蜂的种群动态

传粉榕小蜂和榕树的互利共生是传粉昆虫与植物间协同进化的典范。在榕果(榕树的隐头状花序)内,还生活着多种非传粉榕小蜂。这些生活在密闭榕果内由传粉榕小蜂和非传粉榕小蜂组成的群落对研究群落生态学有很大价值。然而,对生存在单一榕树的榕果内的所有榕小蜂的种群动态了解很少,特别是缺少相对长期的连续数据。通过野外近3a观察和采样,研究了垂叶榕榕小蜂群落结构和榕小蜂的种群动态。共记录榕小蜂16种;各种榕小蜂根据发生规律可分为常见种和偶见种,Eupristina koningsbergeri,Philotrypesis sp.1,Philotrypesis sp.4,Philotrypesis sp.5,Sycoscapter sp.1,Walkerella benjamini,Walkerella sp.1,Sycophila sp.2,Sycobia sp.2为常见种;Sycobia sp.1,Acophila sp.1,Sycophila sp.1,Ormyrus sp.1等为偶见种。每种榕小蜂在单果上的数量随季节呈波动变化,季节对榕小蜂群落的多样性和均匀性无显著影响。除了传粉榕小蜂外,Sycoscapter sp.1也是优势种类之一。传粉榕小蜂的数量与非传粉榕小蜂总数间呈显著负相关。传粉榕小蜂与非传粉榕小蜂几乎都呈负相关,而与Walkerella sp.1在数量上呈显著正相关。Sycobia sp.2与Sycophila sp.2在同一瘿中出现,数量上呈显著正相关。但其它非传粉榕小蜂种类在数量上的相关性较为复杂,可能是造成各种榕小蜂数量波动的一个原因。     

比较钝叶榕的三种传粉者及其传粉效率

钝叶榕 (Ficus curtipes)是雌雄同株,它除了依赖钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂Eupristina sp.传粉外,另外两种进入果内繁殖的杨氏榕树金小蜂Diaziella yangi 和Lipothymus sp.金小蜂也能有效地为它传粉,这3种小蜂同时产卵于雌花的子房内,在榕果内繁殖后代.通过控制性放蜂试验,比较研究钝叶榕3种传粉者的传粉效率,结果表明:自然状态下,3种小蜂在绝大多数榕果里只各进1头.在控制性放蜂试验中,3种小蜂的传粉效率均随着放入雌蜂数量的增加而增加,两种金小蜂的传粉效率有时比钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂的传粉效率还高.当钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂分别与两种金小蜂同时放入榕果内传粉时,其生产的种子数量居于或者是接近两种小蜂单独传粉时形成的种子数量,传粉效率没有显著增加.在比较3种小蜂单种分别放1头和2头的传粉效率时,增加单果放蜂数量,钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂和Lipothymus sp. 的平均传粉效率降低,但杨氏榕树金小蜂的平均传粉效率是增加的.对3种不同属传粉小蜂传粉效率的比较,可为研究榕-蜂互惠系统的互惠的起源提供依据.     

非传粉小蜂对榕-蜂共生系统的影响

榕-蜂共生系统是桑科榕属(Ficus)植物与传粉榕小蜂专一互惠形成的生态学关系。但是,也有一些非传粉的小蜂出现在这个系统中,对榕-蜂共生系统可能产生较大的影响。西双版纳的聚果榕(Ficus racemosa)树上主要有5种非传粉小蜂,分别在榕果发育的不同阶段从果外向果内产卵。在传粉榕小蜂进果之前的花前期,Platyneura testace、Apocrypta sp.和P. mayri这3种非传粉小蜂先后到果外产卵繁殖后代,对榕-蜂共生系统造成显著影响,尤其是影响传粉榕小蜂的繁殖。在传粉榕小蜂进果之后的间花期,P. mayri、A. westwoodi和P. agraensis这3种非传粉小蜂相继到果外产卵,它们虽然能减少种子形成和传粉榕小蜂繁殖的数量,但最终没有对榕-蜂共生系统造成显著的影响。造瘿类的P. mayri可在花前期和间花期产卵繁殖,在花前期产卵时它主要是影响传粉榕小蜂的繁殖,而在间花期产卵时它则更多地是影响种子的生产。     

钝叶榕三种榕小蜂的关键形态和行为差异研究

比较钝叶榕三种同步进果的榕小蜂——钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂、杨氏金小蜂和Lipothymussp.的关键形态,结合它们的进果行为,分析非传粉榕小蜂的形态适应性和依赖传粉榕小蜂进果的原因。结果表明,杨氏金小蜂和Li-pothymussp.的胸部、前后足均趋同于钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂,但两者体表较为光滑,有鳞片状刻纹,少毛,且触角第三部分未衍生出刺突形结构,下颚也无骨板。钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂利用刺突和下颚来撬动苞片,形成微小开口,这一过程约耗费总进果时间的2/3。无论钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂是否进入果腔,一旦苞片处形成开口,杨氏金小蜂和Lipothymussp.即可顺利进入,进入果腔的时间无显著的差异。因此,缺少刺突形结构和骨板是杨氏金小蜂和Lipothymussp.不能独自进果的关键,也意味两者进果必须依赖钝叶榕传粉榕小蜂。     

西双版纳热带雨林对叶榕传粉生物学(英)

研究了西双版纳热带雨林地区雌雄异株植物对叶榕 (FicushispidaL .)的生物学、传粉物候学以及榕小蜂(CeratosolensolmsimarchaliMayr)的传粉和繁殖行为。研究结果表明 :雌雄异株的对叶榕与其他雌雄同株的榕属植物不同 ,它的种子形成与传粉者有着更为复杂的相互关系。对叶榕一年结隐花果 6～ 8次 ,结果高峰期 4～ 5次 ,其中雄性植株仅产生花粉和孕育榕小蜂 ,而雌性植株 (无雄蕊 )则需榕小蜂带花粉进入隐花果内 ,进行传粉授精 ,使之发育成种子。对叶榕的成熟花粉不能从花药开裂处自行散发出来 ,必须由榕小蜂采集才能散落。榕小蜂雌蜂羽化、交配后 ,找到雄花区 ,用足、触角、口器在推动中采集花粉。雌蜂飞出熟榕果找寻雌株或雄株榕树上的幼嫩隐花果 ,一般需 3～ 6 7min ;一部分雌蜂在雄株中寻找幼嫩的隐花果 ,进去产卵繁殖 ,另一部分雌蜂则寻找雌株雌花期嫩隐花果进去传粉。雌蜂在雌株榕树的隐花果内传粉时间为 15～ 2 3h ,在雄株榕树的隐花果内产卵时间为 6～ 9h。对叶榕小蜂在雌株上进入单个隐花果的数量多少关系到雌花结实率 ;观察表明 ,每个隐花果最佳进蜂数为 2头 ;榕小蜂传粉后榕树成熟种子形成率在 5 4 .1%～ 82 .5 %之间 ,平均为 73.8% ;而在雄株上雌蜂进蜂数量则关系到榕小蜂在隐花果内的产卵率 ,     

Isolation of microsatellite loci in the pollinating fig wasp of Ficus hispida, Ceratosolen solmsi

Microsatellite loci were isolated for Ceratosolen solmsi , pollinator of the dioecious Ficus hispida. We developed nine polymorphic microsatellite loci based on the method of polymerase chain reaction isolation of microsatellite arrays (PIMA). Enrichment of genomic libraries was performed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). A subset of 38 positive clones was sequenced; 15 clones showed microsatellite loci. We tested 15 designed primer pairs and nine of them produced polymorphic amplification in 48 individual wasps collected from different fruits of the dioecious host fig Ficus hispida in China. Among the 48 individuals, 49 alleles were obtained at the nine loci. The observed heterozygosity ranged between 0.357 and 0.634.     

聚果榕小蜂繁殖性雌蜂的时空分布格局

运用扩散系数、聚集指数、平均拥挤度、聚块性指数、Green指数和负二项参数等指标比较分析了聚果榕小蜂Ceratosolenfusciceps繁殖性雌蜂的时空分布格局 ,用t-检验拟合了扩散系数测定时分布格局偏离泊松分布的显著性。结果显示 ,聚果榕小蜂繁殖性雌蜂在不同季节阶段的空间分布格局皆为聚集分布 ,不同季节时期之间有较大差异 ,反映了该种繁殖性雌蜂的活动存在比较明显的季节波动。格局强度指标的测度表明 ,聚集分布格局在雨季和雾凉季表现更强且尤以雨季为甚。繁殖性雌蜂的聚集分布格局决定了整个榕小蜂种群分布格局的聚集性 ,还影响着榕树的雌雄性别功能分配格局 ,从而在更深层次上作用于榕小蜂和榕树的互惠共生     

Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for a fig‐pollinating wasp (Ceratosolen sp. 1) of Ficus septica

For an undescribed fig‐pollinating wasp (Ceratosolen sp. 1) of Ficus septica, we isolated 15 polymorphic microsatellite markers from a genomic library partially enriched for GATA and CAG repeats. Polymorphism of these loci was evaluated by genotyping 40 female individuals collected from different fruits of host trees in southern Taiwan. The number of alleles per locus ranged from three to 15 and the observed heterozygosity of each locus ranged from 0.100 to 0.775. These loci would be suitable for further studies concerning population genetics, hybridization and sex ratio adjustment of the coexisting fig‐pollinating wasps.     

Isolation and characterization of microsatellite primers for Ceratosolen fusciceps, the fig-pollinating wasp of Ficus racemosa, and amplification in two populations

Ten microsatellite loci were isolated and characterized for Ceratosolen fusciceps, the pollinating wasp of Ficus racemosa, based on individuals from Xishuangbanna (China) and Chiangmai (Thailand). High levels of variation were found among loci for both populations; allelic number varied from two to 18 (respectively from two to 22), expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.362 to 0.890 (respectively from 0.430 to 0.930).     

Can chemical signals,responsible for mutualistic partner encounter,promote the specific exploitation of nursery pollination mutualisms? – The case of figs and fig wasps

In nursery pollination mutualisms, where pollinators reproduce within the inflorescence they pollinate, floral scents often play a major role in advertizing host location and rewards for the pollinator. However, chemical messages emitted by the plant that are responsible for the encounter of mutualist partners can also be used by parasites of these mutualisms to locate their host. Each species of Ficus (Moraceae) is involved in an obligatory nursery pollination mutualism with usually one pollinating fig wasp (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Agaonidae). In this interaction, volatile compounds emitted by receptive figs are responsible for the attraction of their specific pollinator. However, a large and diverse community of non-pollinating chalcidoid wasps can also parasitize this mutualism. We investigated whether the chemical message emitted by figs to attract their pollinator can promote the host specificity of non-pollinating fig wasps. We analysed the volatile compounds emitted by receptive figs of three sympatric Ficus species, namely, Ficus hispida L., Ficus racemosa L., and Ficus tinctoria G. Forster, and tested the attraction of the pollinator of F. hispida ( Ceratosolen solmsi marchali Mayr), and of one species of non-pollinating fig wasp [ Philotrypesis pilosa Mayr (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae)] to scents emitted by receptive figs of these three Ficus species. Analysis of the volatile compounds emitted by receptive figs revealed that the three Ficus species could be clearly distinguished by their chemical composition. Behavioural bioassays performed in a Y-tube olfactometer showed that both pollinator and parasite were attracted only by the specific odour of F. hispida . These results suggest that the use by non-pollinating fig wasps of a specific chemical message produced by figs could limit host shifts by non-pollinating fig wasps.     

Quantitative tests of interaction between pollinating and non-pollinating fig wasps on dioecious Ficus hispida

Abstract.  1. The interaction between Ficus species and their pollinating wasps (Agaonidae) represents a striking example of a mutualism. Figs also shelter numerous non-pollinating chalcids that exploit the fig–pollinator mutualism.
2. Previous studies showed a weak negative correlation between numbers of pollinating and non-pollinating adults emerging from the same fruit. Little is known about the patterns and intensities of interactions between fig wasps. In the Xishuangbanna tropical rainforests of China, the dioecious Ficus hispida L. is pollinated by Ceratosolen solmsi marchali Mayr and is also exploited by the non-pollinators Philotrypesis pilosa Mayr, Philotrypesis sp., and Apocrypta bakeri Joseph. Here, the interaction of pollinator and non-pollinators on F. hispida is studied quantitatively.
3. The exact time of oviposition was determined for each species of fig wasp. Based on observational and experimental work it is suggested that (i) the relationship between pollinator and non-pollinators is a positive one, and that the genus Philotrypesis appears to have no significant impact on the pollinator population, whereas Apocrypta has a significant effect on both Philotrypesis and Ceratosolen ; (ii) gall numbers do not always increase with increasing number of foundresses, but developmental mortality of larvae correlates positively with the number of foundresses; and (iii) there is a positive correlation between non-pollinator numbers and their rates of parasitism, but the three species of non-pollinators differed in their rates of parasitism and show different effects on pollinator production.
4. The rates of parasitism when combined with the coexistent percentage and developmental mortality, underpin the way non-pollinating fig wasps successfully exploit and coexist stably in a fig–pollinator mutualism.