Effect of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis on TRAM flap harvesting after abdominoplasty

In this study, the effect of intramuscular injection of human vascular endothelial growth factor (hVEGF) on neovascularization following abdominoplasty was investigated. Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups (n = 6). Two control groups and two experimental groups were established. Abdominoplasty was performed in all rats, with division of all the perforator vessels. In the control groups, normal saline was injected into the rectus abdominis muscle, and in the experimental groups, 100 microg of VEGF and normal saline were injected into the rectus muscle. A transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap was harvested on day 20 and day 40 in both the control and experimental groups. The range of viability of the TRAM flap was, respectively, 0 to 20 percent (mean, 6.7 percent) and 0 to 25 percent (mean, 14.2 percent) in both short-term and long-term control groups (no VEGF injected). The study (VEGF) group demonstrated a viability of 50 to 80 percent (mean, 70 percent) for the short-term group and 50 to 85 percent (mean, 72.5 percent) in the long-term group. No wound infection was documented, and there were no deaths during the study period. There was no statistically significant difference between the short-term and long-term divisions of the groups (p < 0.01); however, significant differences were observed between the control and experimental groups (p < 0.01). The authors concluded that VEGF injection after abdominoplasty improved the percentage of TRAM flap viability. This method of delay/revascularization could be used for the difficult problem of flap viability following abdominoplasty and for high-risk patients.     

Comparison of TRAM and DIEP flap physiology in a rat model

Dynamic and physiologic studies objectively comparing the attributes of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps would be most practical in an animal model. This has now been accomplished using the ventral abdomen of the Sprague-Dawley rat. A conventional TRAM flap, a multiple perforator DIEP flap, and a solitary perforator DIEP flap were raised in three equal groups of five rats each. Flow studies using laser Doppler flowmetry demonstrated the highest flow in zone I in the TRAM flap group (87.6 +/- 15.4 percent), which was a statistically significant difference from the multiple perforator DIEP flap group (45.4 +/- 13.3 percent) and the solitary perforator DIEP flap group (43.4 +/- 26.4 percent) (p = 0.005). Flow in zone IV was proportionately lower for all groups, with no significant difference noted between TRAM and DIEP flaps (p = 0.736). Although ultimate flap survival was greatest for the TRAM flap group (96.1 +/- 6.7 percent) when compared with the multiple perforator DIEP flap (79.8 +/- 15.2 percent) or the solitary perforator DIEP flap groups (77.1 +/- 23.0 percent), this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.183). In summary, relative flow to these rat ventral abdomen models was directly proportional to the number of retained musculocutaneous perforators, but a single perforator only could routinely allow near-total survival.     

Venous congestion and blood flow in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 240 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and 271 free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps from two institutions was reviewed to determine the incidence of diffuse venous insufficiency that threatened flap survival and required a microvascular anastomosis to drain the superficial inferior epigastric vein. This problem occurred in five DIEP flaps and did not occur in any of the free TRAM flaps. In each of these cases, the presence of a superficial inferior epigastric vein that was larger than usual was noted. It is therefore suggested that if an unusually large superficial inferior epigastric vein is noted when a DIEP flap is elevated, the vein should be preserved for possible use in flap salvage. Anatomical studies with Microfil injections of the superficial venous system of the DIEP or TRAM flap were also performed in 15 cadaver and 3 abdominoplasty specimens to help determine why venous circulation (and flap survival) in zone IV of the flaps is so variable. Large lateral branches crossing the midline were found in only 18 percent of cases, whereas 45 percent had indirect connections through a deeper network of smaller veins and 36 percent had no demonstrable crossing branches at all. This absence of crossing branches in many patients may explain why survival of the zone IV portion of such flaps is so variable and unpredictable.     

Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation.

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps are related to the harvest of the rectus abdominis muscle. Abdominal contour was analyzed in 155 women who had breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps; 108 women had free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flaps, 37 had pedicled TRAM flaps, and 10 had deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. The reconstruction was unilateral in 110 women and bilateral in 45 women. Three methods of muscle-sparing were used; they are classified as preservation of the lateral muscle, preservation of the medial and lateral muscle, or preservation of the entire muscle. One of these three methods of muscle-sparing was used in 91 women (59 percent) and no muscle-sparing was used in 64 women (41 percent). Postoperative contour abnormalities occurred in 15 woman and included epigastric fullness in five, upper bulge in three, and lower bulge in 10. One woman experienced two abnormalities, one woman experienced three, and no woman developed a hernia. Of these abnormalities, 11 occurred after the free TRAM flap, seven after the pedicled TRAM flap, and none after the DIEP flap. Bilateral reconstruction resulted in 11 abnormalities in nine women, and unilateral reconstruction resulted in seven abnormalities in six women. chi2 analysis of the free and pedicled TRAM flaps demonstrates that muscle-sparing explains the observed differences in upper bulge and upper fullness (p = 0.02), with a trend toward significance for lower bulge (p = 0.06). chi2 analysis of the free TRAM and DIEP flaps does not explain the observed difference in abnormal abdominal contour. Analysis of muscle-sparing and non-muscle-sparing methods demonstrates that the observed difference between the techniques is only explained for a lower bulge after the bilateral free TRAM flap (p = 0.04).     

New microsurgical breast reconstruction using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps

Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps have generally been used for bilateral breast losses. The major disadvantages of this method are the total or partial loss of the rectus abdominis muscles and various resulting postoperative complications, such as abdominal bulging and lumbar pain. With the recent development of perforator flaps and supermicrosurgery with anastomosis of 0.5-mm caliber vessels, these serious complications can be overcome with a paraumbilical perforator adiposal flap, without sacrificing the rectus abdominis muscle. The breasts of a 57-year-old woman who had undergone a bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy, including silicone prostheses, were repaired simultaneously with this new method using free paraumbilical perforator adiposal flaps. This new method of breast augmentation with a vascularized adiposal flap and without any muscle component is minimally invasive; its advantages are the preservation of the rectus abdominis muscles and the short time elevation for the adiposal flap.     

Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps

Breast reconstruction using the lower abdominal free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has the potential to virtually eliminate abdominal donor-site morbidity because the rectus abdominis fascia and muscle are not incised or excised. However, despite its advantages, the free SIEA flap for breast reconstruction is rarely used. A prospective study was conducted of the reliability and outcomes of the use of SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction compared with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. Breast reconstruction with an SIEA flap was attempted in 47 consecutive free autologous tissue breast reconstructions between August of 2001 and November of 2002. The average patient age was 49 years, and the average body mass index was 27 kg/m. The SIEA flap was used in 14 (30 percent) of these breast reconstructions in 12 patients. An SIEA flap was not used in the remaining 33 cases because the SIEA was absent or was deemed too small. The mean superficial inferior epigastric vessel pedicle length was approximately 7 cm. The internal mammary vessels were used as recipients in all SIEA flap cases so that the flap could be positioned sufficiently medially on the chest wall. The average hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with SIEA flaps than it was for those who underwent reconstruction with TRAM or DIEP flaps. Of the 47 free flaps, one SIEA flap was lost because of arterial thrombosis. Medium-size and large breasts were reconstructed with hemi-lower abdominal SIEA flaps, with aesthetic results similar to those obtained with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The free SIEA flap is an attractive option for autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Harvest of this flap does not injure the anterior rectus fascia or underlying rectus abdominis muscle. This can potentially eliminate abdominal donor-site complications such as bulge and hernia formation, and decrease weakness, discomfort, and hospital stay compared with TRAM and DIEP flaps. The disadvantages of an SIEA flap are a smaller pedicle diameter and shorter pedicle length than TRAM and DIEP flaps and the absence or inadequacy of an arterial pedicle in most patients. Nevertheless, in selected patients, the SIEA flap offers advantages over the TRAM and DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.     

Breast augmentation with bilateral deepithelialized TRAM flaps: an alternative approach to breast augmentation with autologous tissue

Since the 1980s, many patients have benefited from the use of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap for postmastectomy reconstruction. In addition to cancer reconstruction, this technique has recently been used to treat patients with breast implant intolerance and for reconstruction after siliconoma resection. However, physicians and patients alike believe that such an extensive procedure should not be used for aesthetic purposes, and to the authors' knowledge, no study has been reported on the use of pedicled TRAM flaps for aesthetic augmentation mammaplasty. In the past several years, a number of the authors' patients have requested simultaneous breast augmentation and abdominoplasty. These patients objected to the use of prosthetic implants because of potential complications such as implant failure, capsular contracture, wrinkling, and palpability. Therefore, from 1995 to 2000, the authors performed 14 cases of bilateral breast augmentation with deepithelialized, pedicled TRAM flaps. In this series, the donor-site complication rate was similar to that of the traditional TRAM flap. Surprisingly, no cases of complete or partial flap loss were clinically detected. The only complaints were pedicle bulges at the costal margins. These patients were all extremely satisfied with the results. It was concluded that the TRAM flap is safe for augmentation in a subset of carefully selected women with hypoplastic or atrophic breasts. The authors discuss patient selection, technique, and their experience with this method of breast augmentation.     

Modified free paraumbilical perforator flap: the next logical step in breast reconstruction

The free paraumbilical perforator flap that was developed with only the perforator penetrating the rectus abdominis muscle seems nearly ideal from the donor-site perspective, because it reduces morbidity virtually to that of an abdominoplasty. However, it requires "supermicrosurgery" skills for suturing of vessels with diameters of 0.7 mm or less, making the procedure technically demanding and risky. Another significant disadvantage of that technique is that the flap has very short vascular pedicles. To overcome the disadvantages of the free paraumbilical perforator flap, a minor modification in flap harvesting that improves the vessel size and length is described. Results for a total of 15 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with modified free paraumbilical perforator flaps are presented, and the advantages and disadvantages of this flap are discussed.     

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients

The authors retrospectively reviewed the computerized records of 71 women undergoing 80 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions after mastectomy over a 1-year period. There were 33 normal, 26 overweight, and 12 obese patients. No statistically significant difference in flap complications was found between groups. Overall fat necrosis rates were 11.4 percent for the normal-weight patients, 6.7 percent for the overweight patients, and 6.7 percent for the obese patients. Postoperative hospital time was similar for all groups. The occurrence of abdominal wall fascial laxity was uncommon and similar for all groups. Large (>900 g) reconstructions were completed without prohibitive complications in the reconstruction flap. The DIEP flap represents a significant advance in autologous breast tissue reconstruction. Although concerns regarding fat necrosis rates in DIEP flaps have been voiced, the authors did not see an increasing rate of fat necrosis in their overweight and obese patients, and their overall rate of fat necrosis is comparable to rates reported for free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Also, increasing body mass index did not seem to affect the rate of delayed complications of the abdominal wall, such as abdominal wall hernia or bulging. Although it was not statistically significant, the authors did observe a trend toward increased wound-healing complications with increasing body mass index. Their data also support the claim that the complete sparing of the rectus abdominis muscles afforded by the DIEP flap avoids abdominal wall fascial bulging or defects often seen in obese TRAM reconstruction patients. Because flap and wound complication rates are similar or superior to those of other autologous tissue reconstruction techniques and the occurrence of abdominal wall defects is all but eliminated, the DIEP flap likely represents the preferred autologous breast reconstruction technique for overweight and obese patients.     

Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection,choice of flap,and outcome

Recent reports of breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap indicate increased fat necrosis and venous congestion as compared with the free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Although the benefits of the DIEP flap regarding the abdominal wall are well documented, its reconstructive advantage remains uncertain. The main objective of this study was to address selection criteria for the free TRAM and DIEP flaps on the basis of patient characteristics and vascular anatomy of the flap that might minimize flap morbidity. A total of 163 free TRAM or DIEP flap breast reconstructions were performed on 135 women between 1997 and 2000. Four levels of muscle sparing related to the rectus abdominis muscle were used. The free TRAM flap was performed on 118 women, of whom 93 were unilateral and 25 were bilateral, totaling 143 flaps. The DIEP flap procedure was performed on 17 women, of whom 14 were unilateral and three were bilateral, totaling 20 flaps. Morbidities related to the 143 free TRAM flaps included return to the operating room for 11 flaps (7.7 percent), total necrosis in five flaps (3.5 percent), mild fat necrosis in 14 flaps (9.8 percent), mild venous congestion in two flaps (1.4 percent), and lower abdominal bulge in eight women (6.8 percent). Partial flap necrosis did not occur. Morbidities related to the 20 DIEP flaps included return to the operating room for three flaps (15 percent), total necrosis in one flap (5 percent), and mild fat necrosis in two flaps (10 percent). Partial flap necrosis, venous congestion, and a lower abdominal bulge were not observed. Selection of the free TRAM or DIEP flap should be made on the basis of patient weight, quantity of abdominal fat, and breast volume requirement, and on the number, caliber, and location of the perforating vessels. Occurrence of venous congestion and total flap loss in the free TRAM and DIEP flaps appears to be independent of the patient age, weight, degree of muscle sparing, and tobacco use. The occurrence of fat necrosis is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) but not related to patient age or preservation of the rectus abdominis muscle. The ability to perform a sit-up is related to patient weight (p < 0.001) and patient age (p < 0.001) but not related to preservation of the muscle or intercostal nerves. The incidence of lower abdominal bulge is reduced after DIEP flap reconstruction (p < 0.001). The DIEP flap can be an excellent option for properly selected women.     

Basic fibroblast growth factor expression following surgical delay of rat transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps

Partial transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap loss in breast reconstruction can be a devastating complication for both patient and surgeon. Surgical delay of the TRAM flap has been shown to improve flap viability and has been advocated in "high-risk" patients seeking autogenous breast reconstruction. Despite extensive clinical evidence of the effectiveness of surgical delay of TRAM flaps, the mechanisms by which the delay phenomenon occurs remain poorly understood. To examine whether angiogenic growth factors such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) may play a role in the delay phenomenon, the authors studied the expression of bFGF in rat TRAM flaps subjected to surgical delay. Thirty-five female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to one of four TRAM flap groups: no delay (n = 6), 7-day delay (n = 12), 14-day delay (n = 10), or 21-day delay (n = 7). Surgical delay consisted of incising skin around the perimeter of the planned 2.5 x 5.0-cm TRAM flap followed by ablation of both superior epigastric arteries and the left inferior epigastric artery, thus preserving the right inferior epigastric artery (the nondominant blood supply to the rectus abdominis muscle of the rat). TRAM flaps were then elevated after 7, 14, and 21 days of delay by raising zones II, III, and IV off the abdominal wall fascia. Once hemostasis was assured, the flaps were sutured back in place. All flaps were designed with the upper border of the flap 1 cm below the xiphoid tip. Three days after the TRAM procedure, postfluorescein planimetry was used to determine percent area viability of both superficial and deep portions of TRAM flaps. All rats were euthanized and full-thickness TRAM specimens were taken from zones I, II, III, and IV for enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay analysis of bFGF levels. Statistical testing was done by t test (percent viability) and two-way analysis of variance (bFGF levels). All delayed flaps had significantly higher bFGF levels when compared with all nondelayed control flaps (p < 0.05). The bFGF levels were not different in the rats that received TRAM flaps 7, 14, or 21 days after delay surgery. There was also no significant difference in bFGF levels among zones I through IV. Control rats had more peripheral zone necrosis compared with all delayed TRAM rats. All delayed flaps had a significantly higher area of flap viability superficially than nondelayed control flaps (p < 0.05). There was no difference in deep flap viability. Surgical delay of rat TRAM flaps is associated with improved flap viability and significantly elevated levels of bFGF over nondelayed TRAM flaps at postoperative day 3 after TRAM surgery. The increases in bFGF noted at this time point suggests that bFGF may play a role in the improved TRAM flap viability observed after delay surgery. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the role bFGF may play in the delay phenomenon.     

Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?

The advantages of breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and the muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (MS-2) are well recognized. Both techniques optimize abdominal function by maintaining the vascularity, innervation, and continuity of the rectus abdominis muscle. The purpose of this study was to compare these two methods of breast reconstruction and determine whether there is a difference in outcome. The study considered 177 women who have had breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing flaps over a 4-year period. This includes 89 women who had an MS-2 free TRAM flap procedure, of which 65 were unilateral and 24 were bilateral, and 88 women who had a DIEP flap procedure, of which 66 were unilateral and 22 were bilateral. The total number of flaps was 223. Mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 3 to 49 months). For all MS-2 free TRAM flaps (n = 113), outcome included fat necrosis in eight (7.1 percent), venous congestion in three (2.7 percent), and total necrosis in two (1.8 percent). For the women who had an MS-2 free TRAM flap, an abdominal bulge occurred in three women (4.6 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and in five women (21 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. The ability to perform sit-ups was noted in 63 women (97 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and 20 women (83 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. For all DIEP flaps (n = 110), outcome included fat necrosis in seven (6.4 percent), venous congestion in five (4.5 percent), and total necrosis in three (2.7 percent) patients. For the women who had DIEP flap reconstruction, an abdominal bulge occurred in one woman (1.5 percent) after unilateral reconstruction and in one woman (4.5 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. The ability to perform sit-ups was noted in all women after unilateral reconstruction and in 21 women (95 percent) after bilateral reconstruction. These results demonstrate that there are no significant differences in fat necrosis, venous congestion, or flap necrosis after DIEP or MS-2 free TRAM flap reconstruction. The percentage of women who are able to perform sit-ups and the percentage of women who did not develop a postoperative abdominal bulge is increased after DIEP flap reconstruction; however, this difference is not statistically significant.     

Transverse dual-perforator fascia-sparing free TRAM flap: technique description

As techniques for breast reconstruction with autologous abdominal tissue have evolved, free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps have persevered because of their superior reliability and minimal donor-site morbidity compared with muscle-sparing techniques. Further refinements are described in this article to maximize abdominal flap perfusion and ensure primary closure of the rectus fascia. It has been well documented that incorporating both the lateral and medial perforators provides maximal perfusion to all zones of the lower abdominal transverse skin flap. However, dissection and harvest of both sets of perforators requires disruption and/or sacrifice of abdominal wall tissues. The technique presented here was designed to use both the lateral and medial row perforators, and to minimize abdominal wall disruption. Deep inferior epigastric artery medial and lateral row perforators are selected for their diameter, proximity, and transverse orientation to each other. A transverse ellipse of fascia is incised to incorporate both perforators. The fascial incision is then extended inferiorly in a T configuration to allow for adequate exposure and harvest of the vascular pedicle and/or rectus abdominis, and primary closure. Limiting perforator selection to one row of inferior epigastric arteries diminishes perfusion to the abdominal flap. Furthermore, perforator and inferior epigastric artery dissection often results in fascial defects that are not amenable to primary closure. However, maximal abdominal flap perfusion and minimal donor-site morbidity can be achieved with the transverse dual-perforator fascia-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap technique and can be performed in most patients.     

Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

A series of 310 breasts reconstructed by a single surgeon using free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps was reviewed to see if there were any differences in the incidence of fat necrosis and/or partial flap loss between the two techniques. During the study period, 279 breasts were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 31 breasts were reconstructed with DIEP flaps. In the breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, the incidence of partial flap loss was 2.2 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 12.9 percent. The DIEP flaps were divided into two groups. For the first eight flaps, patients were selected using the same criteria normally used to choose patients for free TRAM flaps. In this unselected early group, the incidence of partial flap loss was 37.5 percent and the incidence of fat necrosis was 62.5 percent. Because of the high incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis in the first eight flaps, subsequent selection was modified to limit the use of DIEP flaps to patients who had at least one sufficiently large perforator in each flap (a palpable pulse and a vein at least 1 mm in diameter) and who did not require more than 70 percent of the flap to create a breast of adequate size. In this later (selected) group, fat necrosis (17.4 percent) and partial flap loss (8.7 percent) were reduced to a level only moderately higher than that found in the free TRAM flap group. From these data, it can be concluded that the incidence of partial flap loss and fat necrosis is higher in DIEP flaps than in free TRAM flaps, probably because the blood flow to the former flap is less robust. This difficulty can be circumvented to some extent, however, by careful patient selection. Factors that should be considered include tobacco use, size of the perforators (especially the vein), and (in unilateral reconstructions) the amount of flap tissue across the midline needed to create an adequately sized breast. If these factors are properly considered when planning the operation, fat necrosis and partial flap loss can be reduced to an acceptable level. For selected patients, the DIEP flap is an excellent technique that can obtain a successful, autologous tissue breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity. For patients who are not good candidates for reconstruction with this flap, the free TRAM flap remains a good alternative.     

Cost-based comparison between perforator flaps and TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction

More women than ever before are undergoing mastectomies secondary to increased awareness and screening. This increase has also caused a corresponding increase in the number of breast reconstructions requested each year. The increased demand for reconstruction has fueled recent advances in new techniques. Aside from foreign-body reconstruction such as implants, the methods now being used are related to autogenous donations and reconstruction. Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps and perforator flaps are currently being used for autogenous breast reconstruction. This study will compare these two techniques on the basis of cost and length of stay. A retrospective study of 49 patients undergoing a total of 64 perforator flap breast reconstructions at Memorial Medical Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, during the 1997 calendar year was used. There were 59 deep inferior epigastric perforator and five gluteal artery perforator breast reconstructions. All patients underwent some form of breast reconstruction and differed only in respect to whether a mastectomy was performed and whether the reconstruction was unilateral or bilateral. Those patients who underwent a mastectomy with immediate perforator flap reconstruction (n = 26) were then compared with patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate TRAM flap reconstruction (n = 154) at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The data from the Anderson Study were obtained from material published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in 1996. Comparison of patients was limited to those who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction because this was the design of the M. D. Anderson study. This approach allowed a cost and length of stay comparison while keeping other variables relatively similar. Patients in the perforator flap series enjoyed a marginally shorter operating time and a much shorter length of stay. On average, the operative time for all perforator flap reconstructions was approximately 2 hours shorter than for all TRAM flaps. As for length of stay, perforator flap patients were discharged, on average, 3 days after the initial reconstruction. In contrast, TRAM flap patients remained in the hospital for an average of approximately 7 days after the initial reconstruction. The overall total, average cost for the perforator flap reconstruction in this study is $9625, whereas the average cost of all TRAM flaps performed in the Anderson study is $18,070.     

Vaginal reconstruction after extended radical pelvic surgery for cancer: comparison of two techniques

An immediate partial or total vaginal reconstruction is frequently proposed in cases of exenterative or extended radical pelvic surgery for cancer treatment. One of the main complications after this reconstruction is the vagina obliteration caused by the healing process. This study compares the results of two different reconstructive techniques, particularly focusing on general complications and the risk of vaginal occlusion. A transversus rectus abdominis musculoperitoneal (TRAMP) composite flap has been performed in five cases, and an inverted inferior transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (TRAM) has been used in another five cases. Recovery was uneventful in eight cases. One patient (case 5) developed an aortofemoral embolism requiring a bilateral transfemoral embolectomy and heparin administration. Another patient (case 9) experienced severe peritonitis because of the partial leak of the rectal anastomosis, and therefore a Mikulicz's colostomy was performed. Four patients who underwent the TRAMP flap developed a complete closure of the neovagina. In one patient with a TRAMP flap, a severe shortening (2 cm) of the neovagina occurred. Five patients out of five who underwent a reconstruction with a TRAM flap had a stable length of the neovagina (6 to 12 cm) and no shrinkage in diameter occurred, even though a vaginal stent was not used. The conventional inferior TRAM flap with a skin paddle seems to better maintain a stable length of the neovagina than the TRAMP composite flap with peritoneum.     

Ex vivo intraoperative angiography for rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flaps

In this study, the vascular architecture of rectus abdominis free flaps nourished by deep inferior epigastric vessels was investigated using an ex vivo intraoperative angiogram. Oblique rectus abdominis free flaps were elevated and isolated from the donor site. In 11 patients, the vascular architecture of these flaps was analyzed before the flap was thinned. Radiographic study identified an average of 2.1 large deep inferior epigastric arterial perforators in each flap. In nine of the 11 flaps, the axial artery was visible. In four flaps, the axial artery originated from the perforator of the lateral branch of the deep inferior epigastric artery; in five others, it originated from the medial branch. In each flap, the angle of the axial perforator from its anterior rectus sheath in the vertical plane was measured; its mean was 50.6 degrees. All flaps survived, although three showed partial necrosis in the distal portions. In two of these three flaps, the axial artery was not visible in the angiograms, and the third revealed a one-sided distribution of axial flap arteries. Using ex vivo intraoperative angiography, the architecture of the individual flap, its axial perforator, and its connecting axial flap vessel could be investigated. This information can help the surgeon safely thin and separate the flap.     

The oblique rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: revisited clinical applications

The authors present their experience with a previously described but infrequently used variation of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Skin paddles angled obliquely from the line of the rectus abdominis and toward the rib cage were successfully carried on periumbilical perforators from the inferior epigastric system. Skin paddle dimensions ranged from 6.5 to 12 cm in width and from 10 to 27 cm in length in 14 consecutive patients. In six of the 14 patients, the flap was used intraabdominally to obliterate radiated pelvic defects and to close radiated vaginal defects. Five flaps were placed externally to repair radiated wounds of the perineum, thigh, and trunk, and the remaining three cases were performed as free tissue transfers. One cadaver injection study was performed to redemonstrate the preferential flow of fluid in a superior-oblique direction from periumbilical perforators. Termed the oblique rectus abdominis musculocutaneous ("ORAM") flap, this flap variation has significant advantages in terms of ease of dissection and versatility over its flap cousins the vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.     

Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions

A recent article by Kaplan and Allen suggested that deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction was less expensive than reconstruction performed with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. To test that hypothesis, a series of patients who had undergone unilateral breast-mound reconstruction by the first author using DIEP or free TRAM flaps between November 1, 1996, and March 30, 2000, were reviewed. Bilateral reconstructions and reconstructions performed by other surgeons in the department were excluded to eliminate all variables except the choice of flap. All hours in the operating room and days in the hospital until discharge were included. Early readmissions for the treatment of complications were included, as were the costs of the mastectomy in the case of immediate reconstructions, but late revisions and nipple reconstructions were not. The totals were then converted into resource costs in 1999 dollars, and the DIEP and free TRAM flap groups compared. There were 21 DIEP flaps and 24 free TRAM flaps in the series. In this series, there was no significant difference between the cost of DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.