Novel mu-selective Met-enkephalinamide analogs with antagonist activity. Synthesis, receptor binding, analgesic properties and conformational studies

Four novel mu-selective peptide antagonists have been synthesized and examined for receptor binding, analgesic agonist and antagonist activity and energy conformational properties. These peptides were designed by analogy to results of molecular modeling of 3-phenyl piperidines which led to incorporating four modified tyrosine residues, m-Tyr, beta-methyl-m-Tyr, N-phenethyl-m-Tyr and alpha, beta-dimethyl-m-Tyr into D-Ala2-Met5-enkephalinamide. Peptides were synthesized by stepwise solution synthesis using an active ester coupling procedure. Receptor binding assays were performed on rat brain homogenates and data were analyzed by a modified version of the program LIGAND. Analgesic agonist and antagonist activity was evaluated by the mouse tail-flick test. Energy-optimized conformations were obtained using a program called Molecule-AIMS. The results demonstrate that relative ratios of in vivo agonist and antagonist potencies in D-Ala2-Met5-enkephalinamides can be modulated by chemical modification of the tyrosine residue. A shift in the phenolic-OH position from para to meta significantly enhances relative antagonist versus agonist activity; addition of a beta-CH3 group to the m-Tyr enhances mu-selectivity and leads to nearly equal agonist/antagonist activity. Energy conformational studies indicate that all analogs with high mu-receptor affinity examined have a common energy accessible B'II 2-3 turn conformation similar to that previously identified for high mu-affinity binding in peptides, lending further support to this candidate conformer. This conformer also has tyrosine side-chain angles which allowed total overlap with the amine and phenolic groups of a known structure of 3-(m-OH phenyl)-piperidine. This structural similarity together with the observation of mixed agonist antagonist activity in both types of opioids confirms the rationale upon which design of these peptides was based.     

Synthesis and biologic activity of 3 beta-thiovitamin D3

We synthesized 3 beta-thiovitamin D3 from 7-dehydrocholesterol and tested its biological activity and protein binding properties. The thiovitamin was found to be a weak vitamin D agonist at high doses in vivo. It was poorly bound by both vitamin D-binding protein as well as by the intestinal cytosol receptor for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. It did not increase the synthesis of calcium binding protein in the chick embryonic duodenum and did not block the activity of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in this system. We conclude that 3 beta-thiovitamin D3 is a weak vitamin D agonist in vivo with no agonist activity or antagonist activity to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the chick embryonic duodenum.     

The pharmacological action of MT-7

The mamba toxin MT-7 is the most selective ligand currently available for the muscarinic M1 receptor subtype. The toxin binds stably to the receptor and blocks the agonist-induced activation non-competitively. Although its mode of action on M1 receptors is not yet fully understood, some of the toxin properties support an allosteric mechanism. Thus, the toxin fails to elicit a complete inhibition of the binding of either the muscarinic antagonist [3H]N-methyl-scopolamine ([3H]NMS) or the agonist [3H]acetylcholine ([3H]ACh). When added to ligand-occupied M1 receptors, the toxin slows the dissociation rate of [3H]NMS and increases that of [3H]ACh. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have provided important information about the toxin amino acid residues which are critical for the stable binding to the receptor and for the allosteric modulation of antagonist dissociation. In vivo studies have shown that the intracerebral injection of MT-7 causes a long-lasting blockade of M1 receptor, thus providing a tool for the characterization of the functional role of this receptor subtype in discrete brain areas.     

Regulation of Serotonin2A Receptors in Heterologous Expression Systems

Abstract: The serotonin_2A and serotonin_2C receptors are unique among receptors coupled to guanine nucleotide binding proteins in that chronic treatment in vivo with agonists as well as antagonists decreases receptor density. In an attempt to uncover molecular events involved in down-regulation of the serotonin_2A receptor, the ability of agonists and antagonists to alter receptor density was examined in three heterologous expression systems, i.e., transfected NIH 3T3, transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney, and transfected AtT-20 cells. All three transfected cell lines exhibited pharmacological properties consistent with that predicted for cells expressing the serotonin_2A receptor. However, the three cell lines displayed different receptor regulation properties in response to drugs acting at the serotonin_2A receptor. In transfected NIH 3T3 cells, neither agonist nor antagonist treatment altered receptor density. Treatment with agonist as well as antagonist led to up-regulation of the serotonin_2A receptor in transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. In transfected AtT-20 cells, treatment with agonist led to receptor down-regulation, whereas antagonist treatment increased receptor density. Thus, the cellular background in which the serotonin_2A receptor is expressed appears to determine the regulation properties of the receptor.     

Effects of unilateral 6-OHDA lesions on [3H]-N-propylnorapomorphine binding in striatum ex vivo and vulnerability to amphetamine-evoked dopamine release in rat

It has been argued that agonist ligands for dopamine D(2/3) receptors recognize a privileged subset of the receptors in living striatum, those which are functionally coupled to intracellular G-proteins. In support of this claim, the D(2/3) agonist [(3)H]-N-propylnorapomorphine ([(3)H]NPA) proved to be more vulnerable to competition from endogenous dopamine than was the antagonist ligand [(11)C]raclopride, measured ex vivo in mouse striatum, and subsequently in multi-tracer PET studies of analogous design. Based on these results, we predicted that prolonged dopamine depletion would result in a preferential increase in agonist binding, and a lesser competition from residual dopamine to the agonist binding. To test this hypothesis we used autoradiography to measure [(3)H]NPA and [(3)H]raclopride binding sites in hemi-parkinsonian rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesions, with and without amphetamine challenge. Unilateral lesions were associated with a more distinct increase in [(3)H]NPA binding ex vivo than was seen for [(3)H]raclopride binding in vitro. Furthermore, this preferential asymmetry in [(3)H]NPA binding was more pronounced in amphetamine treated rats. We consequently predict that agonist ligands should likewise be fitter than antagonists for detecting responses to denervation in positron emission tomography studies of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Agonist binding increases in vivo are likely to reflect the composite of a sensitization-like phenomenon, and relatively less competition from endogenous dopamine, as seen in the lesioned side of 6-OHDA induced hemi-parkinsonism.     

Identification of a GPER/GPR30 antagonist with improved estrogen receptor counterselectivity

GPER/GPR30 is a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled estrogen receptor that regulates many aspects of mammalian biology and physiology. We have previously described both a GPER-selective agonist G-1 and antagonist G15 based on a tetrahydro-3H-cyclopenta[c]quinoline scaffold. The antagonist lacks an ethanone moiety that likely forms important hydrogen bonds involved in receptor activation. Computational docking studies suggested that the lack of the ethanone substituent in G15 could minimize key steric conflicts, present in G-1, that limit binding within the ERα ligand binding pocket. In this report, we identify low-affinity cross-reactivity of the GPER antagonist G15 to the classical estrogen receptor ERα. To generate an antagonist with enhanced selectivity, we therefore synthesized an isosteric G-1 derivative, G36, containing an isopropyl moiety in place of the ethanone moiety. We demonstrate that G36 shows decreased binding and activation of ERα, while maintaining its antagonist profile towards GPER. G36 selectively inhibits estrogen-mediated activation of PI3K by GPER but not ERα. It also inhibits estrogen- and G-1-mediated calcium mobilization as well as ERK1/2 activation, with no effect on EGF-mediated ERK1/2 activation. Similar to G15, G36 inhibits estrogen- and G-1-stimulated proliferation of uterine epithelial cells in vivo. The identification of G36 as a GPER antagonist with improved ER counterselectivity represents a significant step towards the development of new highly selective therapeutics for cancer and other diseases.     

Comparison of in vivo and in vitro parameters of opiate receptor binding in naive and tolerant dependent rodents.

In vivo and in vitro approaches were used to investigate a possible change in the opiate receptors during the development of tolerance/ depende. With the pAx method no significant change in the apparent pA₂ of naloxone in tolerant rats in vivo could be found, indicating that no substantial change in the affinity for the receptors takes place. Comparison of receptor binding of ³H-etorphine and ³H-naloxone to rat brain homogenate in vitro showed no difference in binding between naive and tolerant rats. The displacement of small amounts of high labeled antagonist or agonist by increasing amounts of unlabeled antagonist in mouse brain in vivo offered the possibility of characterizing properties of receptors in the intact animal. This technique revealed no indication of a change in the number of receptor sites in tolerant animals. An apparently lower affinity in the tolerant animals could be explained by the morphine present in these animals. Displacement of ³H-etorphine from receptors by a high amount of unlabeled naltrexone in vivo could also be demonstrated by autoradiography.     

Cloning, expression, and characterization of the unique bovine A1 adenosine receptor. Studies on the ligand binding site by site-directed mutagenesis.

The bovine brain A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) is distinct from other A1ARs in that it displays the unique agonist potency series of N6-R-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) greater than N6-S-phenylisopropyladenosine (S-PIA) greater than 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine and has a 5-10-fold higher affinity for both agonists and antagonists. The cDNA for this receptor has been cloned from a size-selected (2-4-kb) bovine brain library and sequenced. The 2.0-kb cDNA encodes a protein of 326 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of 36,570 daltons. The amino acid sequence fits well into the seven-transmembrane domain motif typical of G protein-coupled receptors. Northern analysis in bovine tissue using the full length cDNA demonstrates mRNAs of 3.4 and 5.7 kb with a tissue distribution consistent with A1AR binding. Subcloning of the cDNA in a pCMV5 expression vector with subsequent transfection into both COS7 and Chinese hamster ovary cells revealed a fully functional A1AR which could inhibit adenylylcyclase and retained the unique pharmacologic properties of the bovine brain A1AR. The A1AR was found to have a single histidine residue in each of transmembrane domains 6 and 7. Histidine residues have been postulated by biochemical studies to be important for ligand binding. Mutation of His-278 to Leu-278 (seventh transmembrane domain) dramatically decreased both agonist and antagonist binding by greater than 90%. In contrast, mutation of His-251 to Leu-251 decreased antagonist affinity and the number of receptors recognized by an antagonist radioligand. In contrast, agonist affinity was not perturbed but the number of receptors detected by an agonist radioligand was also reduced. These data suggest that both histidines are important for both agonist and antagonist binding, but His-278 appears critical for ligand binding to occur.     

Beta-adrenergic receptors: Regulatory role of agonists

Direct radioligand binding studies have been used to probe the molecular mechanisms whereby agonist catecholamines regulate the function of betaadrenergic receptors in a model system, the frog erythrocyte. The unique characteristics of agonist as opposed to antagonist action are first, the ability to stimulate the adenylate cyclase through the receptor and second, the ability to desensitize the system by alterations induced in beta-adrenergic receptors. These properties of agonist are not shared by antagonist despite the high affinity and specificity of antagonist binding to the beta-adrenergic receptors. Agonist and antagonist receptor complexes may be distinguished in a variety of ways including differences in their sensitivity to regulatory guanine nucleotides and also by gel chromatography on AcA 34 Ultragel. The agonist receptor complex appears to elute from the columns with an apparently increased size. A “dynamic receptor affinity model” of beta-adrenergic receptor action is proposed which features several distinct conformational states of the receptor. Agonists have much higher affinity for the physiologically active or coupled state of the receptor, whereas antagonists have equal affinity for both. In addition, a third “desensitized” state of the receptor is also postulated to exist.     

Postmortem Changes in Binding to the Muscarinic Receptor from Human Cerebral Cortex

Abstract: The effects of storage at 4°C on the antagonist and agonist binding properties of the muscarinic acetyl-choline receptor from fresh surgical and frozen autopsy samples from human cerebral cortex were studied. The number of 1-[³H]3-quinuclidinyl benzilate binding sites and their affinities were stable up to 51 h, both when stored as pieces of intact nonfrozen tissue and as a homogenate. The agonist binding properties as measured by the ability of the muscarinic agonist carbachol to compete with l-[³H]3-quinuclidinyl benzilate were also stable up to 51 h when the tissue was stored in the form of pieces. The affinity for carbachol decreased when the tissue was stored as a homogenate. The frozen autopsy samples showed no significant differences in binding properties in comparison with fresh neurosurgical tissue.     

Determinants of antagonist binding at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit, GluR-D. Role of the conserved arginine 507 and glutamate 727 residues.

Previous structural and mutagenesis studies indicate that the invariant alpha-amino and alpha-carboxyl groups of glutamate receptor agonists are engaged in polar interactions with oppositely charged, conserved arginine and glutamate residues in the ligand-binding domain of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor. To examine the role of these residues (R507 and E727 in the GluR-D subunit) in the discrimination between agonists and antagonists, we analyzed the ligand-binding properties of homomeric GluR-D and its soluble ligand-binding domain with mutations at these positions. Filter-binding assays using [3H]AMPA, an agonist, and [3H]Ro 48-8587, a high-affinity antagonist, as radioligands revealed that even a conservative mutation at R507 (R507K) resulted in the complete loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. In contrast, a negative charge at position 727 was necessary for agonist binding, whereas the isosteric mutation, E727Q, abolished all agonist binding but retained high-affinity binding for [3H]Ro 48-8587, displaceable by 7,8-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione. Competition binding studies with antagonists representing different structural classes in combination with ligand docking experiments suggest that the role of E727 is antagonist-specific, ranging from no interaction to weak electrostatic interactions involving indirect and direct hydrogen bonding with the antagonist molecule. These results underline the importance of ion pair interaction with E727 for agonist activity and suggest that an interaction with R507, but not with E727, is essential for antagonist binding.     

Inhibition of forebrain μ-opioid receptor signaling by low concentrations of rimonabant does not require cannabinoid receptors and directly involves μ-opioid receptors

Increasing number of publications shows that cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)) specific compounds might act in a CB(1) independent manner, including rimonabant, a potent CB(1) receptor antagonist. Opioids, cannabinoids and their receptors are well known for their overlapping pharmacological properties. We have previously reported a prominent decrease in μ-opioid receptor (MOR) activity when animals were acutely treated with the putative endocannabinoid noladin ether (NE). In this study, we clarified whether the decreased MOR activation caused by NE could be reversed by rimonabant in CB(1) receptor deficient mice. In functional [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays, we have elucidated that 0.1mg/kg of intraperitoneal (i.p.) rimonabant treatment prior to that of NE treatment caused further attenuation on the maximal stimulation of Tyr-d-Ala-Gly-(NMe)Phe-Gly-ol (DAMGO), which is a highly specific MOR agonist. Similar inhibitory effects were observed when rimonabant was injected i.p. alone and when it was directly applied to forebrain membranes. These findings are cannabinoid receptor independent as rimonabant caused inhibition in both CB(1) single knockout and CB(1)/CB(2) double knockout mice. In radioligand competition binding assays we highlighted that rimonabant fails to displace effectively [(3)H]DAMGO from MOR in low concentrations and is highly unspecific on the receptor at high concentrations in CB(1) knockout forebrain and in their wild-type controls. Surprisingly, docking computational studies showed a favorable binding position of rimonabant to the inactive conformational state of MOR, indicating that rimonabant might behave as an antagonist at MOR. These findings were confirmed by radioligand competition binding assays in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with MOR, where a higher affinity binding site was measured in the displacement of the tritiated opioid receptor antagonist naloxone. However, based on our in vivo data we suggest that other, yet unidentified mechanisms are additionally involved in the observed effects.     

Rat ovarian angiotensin II receptors. Characterization and coupling to estrogen secretion

Angiotensin II receptor agonist (125I-angiotensin II) and antagonist (125I-[Sar1,Ile8]angiotensin II) bind in a specific and saturable manner to rat ovarian membranes. Agonist and antagonist binding affinity (KD approximately 0.5 nM) and the number of sites estimated (Bmax approximately 60 fmol/mg of protein) were similar. Dissociation of receptor-bound agonist was more rapid than the dissociation of receptor-bound antagonist, and agonist, but not antagonist, dissociation from the receptor was accelerated by GTP gamma S. A 0-150 mM increase in Na+ produced a 27% increase in the KD of agonist binding. Antagonist binding was not modified by Na+. These studies suggest that both agonist and antagonist identify putative angiotensin II receptors in the ovary but that the properties of agonist and antagonist binding are distinct. Angiotensin II antagonist binding sites are present on the granulosa cell layer of rat ovarian follicles (Speth, R. C., Bumpus, F. M., and Husain, A. (1986) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 130, 351-352). To determine the role of angiotensin II in ovarian function, we examined angiotensin II receptors and function during the onset of puberty. High affinity and low capacity angiotensin II receptors were present in ovaries from immature rats. After pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin induced ovulation in immature rats, antagonist binding to total ovarian membranes increased over 3-fold. In vitro incubation of peripubertal ovaries with 1 microM angiotensin II produced a stimulation of estrogen, but not progesterone, secretion. This steroidogenic effect of angiotensin II was most pronounced in the luteal phase of the estrus cycle. These studies point toward the involvement of angiotensin II in the regulation of ovarian function, possibly through modulation of follicular estrogen levels.     

Differences between agonist and antagonist binding following beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization.

The specific beta-adrenergic agonist radioligand (+/-)-[3H]hydroxybenzylisoproterenol ([3H]HBI) was used to investigate alterations in the beta-adrenergic receptors of frog erythrocytes occurring during the process of agonist-induced, receptor-specific desensitization. There was close agreement between the percentage fall in [3H]HBI binding and that in catecholamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity following periods of preincubation of up to 7 h with 0.1 mM (-)-isoproterenol. Desensitization was maximal by 5 h, resulting in a 69% reduction in [3H]HBI binding and a 67% reduction in isoproterenol-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. In contrast, binding of the beta-adrenergic antagonist (-)-[3H]dihydroalprenolol was significantly less affected by desensitization (p is less than 0.05 at 2 1/2, 5, and 7 h), showing a maximum reduction in binding of only 35% in these experiments. The consistent close agreement of reduction in agonist binding with that in hormone-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, together with the significant difference observed between agonist and antagonist binding, implies that an alteration occurs during desensitization which preferentially interferes with agonist binding, while antagonist binding is less affected. The locus of this agonist-specific alteration may be the receptor binding site or a site involved in receptor-enzyme coupling. Agonist binding studies may now be used to assess more completely the desensitized state of beta-adrenergic receptors in systems in which marked desensitization of beta-adrenergic responses is associated with little or no reduction in antagonist binding.     

Hepatic glucocorticoid receptor behaves differently when its hormone binding site is occupied by agonist (triamcinolone acetonide) or antagonist (RU486) steroid ligands

We have examined the influence of sulfhydryl (SH)-group modifying agents on the interaction of the rat liver glucocorticoid receptor (GR) with its known agonist triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and the newly synthesized antagonist mifepristone (RU486). In the freshly prepared cytosol, [3H]TA or [3H]RU486 bound to macromolecule(s) which sediment as 8-9 moieties: the binding of either ligand can be competed with radioinert TA or RU486. The presence of 2-10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), beta-mercaptoethanol (beta-MER), and monothioglycerol (MTG) caused a 2-3 fold increase in the [3H]TA and [3H]RU486 binding to GR. Iodoacetamide (IA) and N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) decreased the agonist binding significantly. In contrast, the [3H]RU486 binding to GR increased by 50 percent in the presence of IA. IA and NEM inhibited the binding of the heat-transformed [3H]TA-receptor complex to DNA-cellulose by 70-90 percent whereas DNA binding of [3H]RU486-bound GR was inhibited only slightly. These results indicate that either a) the interaction of GR with the agonist or antagonist steroid ligands causes differential structural alterations, which are more readily detectable in the presence of SH-modifying agents or b) the agonist and the antagonist interact with distinct steroid binding sites.     

The glucocorticoid antagonist 17 alpha-methyltestosterone binds to the 10 S glucocorticoid receptor and blocks agonist-mediated dissociation of the 10 S oligomer to the 4 S deoxyribonucleic acid-binding subunit

The glucocorticoid antagonist 17 alpha-methyltestosterone inhibits binding of the agonist [3H]triamcinolone acetonide ot the glocucorticoid receptor in cytosol prepared from rat pituitary tumor GH1 cells. Competitive binding studies indicate that the dissociation constant for 17 alpha-methyltestosterone is about 1 microM. After incubation of intact GH1 cells with 10 nM [3H]triamcinolone acetonide at 37 C and subsequent cell fractionation at 4 C, three glucocorticoid receptor forms are observed: cytosolic 10 S receptor, cytosolic 4 S receptor, and nuclear receptor. Concurrent incubation with 17 alpha-methyltestosterone reduces the amount of [3H]triamcinolone acetonide bound to each of these receptor forms. Ligand-exchange assays performed at 0 C in intact cells using [3H]triamcinolone acetonide show that the exchangeable antagonist is associated predominantly with cytosolic 10 S receptor. Immunochemical analysis using monoclonal antibody BuGR2 indicates that 17 alpha-methyltestosterone does not cause substantial accumulation of glucocorticoid receptors in GH1 cell nuclei and, when present together with agonist, reduces nuclear accumulation of receptor seen with agonist alone. Results from dense amino acid labeling studies show that unlike [3H]triamcinolone acetonide, 17 alpha-methyltestosterone does not reduce the total amount of cellular glucocorticoid receptor and does not reduce receptor half-life. These results are consistent with a model for glucocorticoid receptor transformation in which binding of agonist promotes the dissociation of an oligomeric 10 S cytosolic receptor protein to its DNA-binding 4 S subunit. The antagonist 17 alpha-methyltestosterone competes with agonist for binding to the 10 S cytosolic receptor but does not appear to promote dissociation of the oligomer, thus inhibiting agonist-mediated nuclear actions of the glucocorticoid receptor.     

Stimulation of δ-Opioid Receptors Reduces the In Vivo Binding of the Cholecystokinin (CCK)-B-Selective Agonist [3H]pBC 264: Evidence for a Physiological Regulation of CCKergic Systems by Endogenous Enkephalins

Cholecystokinin (CCK) and enkephalins appear to be colocalized in several brain structures, and a physiological interaction between these peptides has been suggested by a large number of pharmacological studies. In this work we have shown, by in vivo binding experiments, that the endogenous enkephalins, protected from degrading enzymes by mixed inhibitors such as kelatorphan and N-[(R,S)-2-benzyl-3-[(S)-2-amino-4-methylthiobutyldithio]-1-oxo pro pyl]- L-phenylalanine benzyl ester (RB 101), a systemically active prodrug, modulate CCK release in mouse brain, leading to an overall increase in the extracellular levels of CCK. This was quantified by measuring the effects of both inhibitors on the in vivo binding of [3H]propionyl-Tyr(SO3H)-gNle-mGly-Trp-(N-Me)Nle-Asp-Phe-NH2 ([3H]pBC 264), a selective and highly potent CCK-B agonist. Thus, intracerebroventricular injection of kelatorphan produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the in vivo binding of [3H]pBC 264 with a maximal effect (40%) at 50 nmol. A similar response was observed after intravenous injection of RB 101 (40 mg/kg). The specific binding of [3H]pBC 264 was also inhibited (25%) by intravenous injection of the selective delta-opioid agonist H-Tyr-D-Cys(StBu)-Gly-Phe-Leu-Thr(OtBu)-OH (BUBUC; 2 mg/kg) but not by the mu-agonist H-Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(N-Me)Phe-Gly-ol (5 mg/kg), suggesting a preferential involvement of delta-opioid receptors in the modulation of CCK release. This was confirmed by using the selective delta-opioid antagonist naltrindole, which prevented the inhibitory effects of BUBUC and of enkephalin-degrading enzyme inhibitors on [3H]pBC 264 binding.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Phe-308 and Phe-312 in transmembrane domain 7 are major sites of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist binding. Imidazoline agonists bind like antagonists

Although agonist binding in adrenergic receptors is fairly well understood and involves residues located in transmembrane domains 3 through 6, there are few residues reported that are involved in antagonist binding. In fact, a major docking site for antagonists has never been reported in any G-protein coupled receptor. It has been speculated that antagonist binding is quite diverse depending upon the chemical structure of the antagonist, which can be quite different from agonists. We now report the identification of two phenylalanine residues in transmembrane domain 7 of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor (Phe-312 and Phe-308) that are a major site of antagonist affinity. Mutation of either Phe-308 or Phe-312 resulted in significant losses of affinity (4-1200-fold) for the antagonists prazosin, WB4101, BMY7378, (+) niguldipine, and 5-methylurapidil, with no changes in affinity for phenethylamine-type agonists such as epinephrine, methoxamine, or phenylephrine. Interestingly, both residues are involved in the binding of all imidazoline-type agonists such as oxymetazoline, cirazoline, and clonidine, confirming previous evidence that this class of ligand binds differently than phenethylamine-type agonists and may be more antagonist-like, which may explain their partial agonist properties. In modeling these interactions with previous mutagenesis studies and using the current backbone structure of rhodopsin, we conclude that antagonist binding is docked higher in the pocket closer to the extracellular surface than agonist binding and appears skewed toward transmembrane domain 7.